CHAPTER IX

HUNGRY FOR FAME

The born artist has a passion for creation. This is true whether his art

expresses itself through paints and brushes, through chisel and stone, on

the stage, through musical tones, through bricks and mortar, or through

the printed page. The born artist may or may not have, as companion to his

passion for creation, a hunger for fame, an ear which adores applause. Few

artists, however, have ever become famous who were not spurred on by an

eager desire for the plaudits of their fellows.

It is possible to have the passion for creation without the hunger for

fame. It is also possible to have a hunger for fame without the passion

for creation. In the "Light That Failed," Kipling tells of little Maisie,

who toiled and struggled, not to create beauty, but for success. Yet, poor

Dick, who loved her, was forced to admit that there was no special reason

why her work should be done at all.

Horace Annesley Vachell, in "Brothers," tells the story of Mark Samphire's

tragedy. "When, after three years of most gruelling, hard work as an art

student, he turned to his great master and asked: 'When you were here last

you said to a friend of mine that it was fortunate for me that I had

independent means. You are my master; you have seen everything I have

done. Pynsent knows my work, too, every line of it. I ask you both: Am I

wasting my time?'

"Neither answered.

"'No mediocre success will content me,' continued Mark. 'I ask you again:

Am I wasting my time?'

"'Yes,' said the master gruffly. He put on his hat and went out.

"'He's not infallible,' Pynsent muttered angrily.

"'Then you advise me to go on? No, you are too honest to do that. I shall

not go on, Pynsent; but I do not regret the last three years. They would

have been wasted, indeed, if they had blinded me to the truth concerning

my powers.'"

WHEN THE DIVINE FIRE IS NOT AFLAME

The art schools of Paris! History, fiction, reminiscence, your own

knowledge, perhaps your own experience, join in piling mountain-high the

tale of wasted years, blasted ambitions, broken hopes and shattered

ideals. Worse than this, perhaps, they tell of homes, galleries and shops

disfigured with mediocre work and criminally hideous daubs.

The music studios of Paris, Berlin, New York, and other large cities, the

schools of dramatic art, the theological seminaries, and the departments

of literature in our universities could add their sad testimony.

Theatrical managers, editors of magazines, publishers, art dealers, and

lyceum bureaus are besieged by armies of aspiring misfits.

Probably there is no more difficult and hazardous undertaking in all the

experience of the vocational counsellor than that presented by people of

this type. The mere fact that a young man has painted scores of pictures

which have been rejected has no bearing on the case. Artistic and literary

history is studded with the glorious names of those who struggled through

years of failure and rejection to final success. This is, in fact, true of

nearly all of the great artists and writers. True, the mere dictum of any

authority, however high, would have very little effect in turning the true

creative artist from his life work, but what a pity it would have been if

Richard Mansfield, Booth Tarkington, Mark Twain, and a host of others had

paid any attention to the advice of those who told them they never could

succeed! And yet, unless the vocational counsellor can encourage and urge

on those who have the divine spark, and turn back from their quest those

who have it not, he has failed in one of his most important tasks.

ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS IN ART

Let us, therefore, examine some of the elements of success in art. We have

seen that the born artist has a passion for creation. He _must_ draw, or

paint, or act, or sing, or write. That which is within him demands

expression and will not be denied. His love is for the work and not for

the reward or the applause. These are but incidental. His visions and

dreams are of ever greater achievements and not of an ever increasing

income or wider popularity. Work well done and the conscious approval of

his own mind are the sweetest nectar to his soul.

But this passion of creation is, perhaps, not enough in itself. "Art is a

jealous mistress." Even the passion for creation must wait upon slowly and

painfully acquired technique, and, in the case of painting, sculpture,

instrumental music, and some other forms of art, upon inherent capacity

and manual skill. Many an artist's soul is imprisoned in a clumsy body

which will not do its bidding.

"Art is long," and he who is unwilling or unable to keep alive the divine

spark through years of poverty had better turn back before he sets forth

upon the great adventure. Searching the portraits of the world's great

artists, living and dead, you will not find a lazy man amongst them.

AN ATTEMPT TO MIX INDOLENCE AND POETRY

During our school days we made the acquaintance of Larime Hutchinson, then

a lad of twenty, shy, self-conscious, pathetically credulous, and hobbled

by a prodigious ineptitude which made him a favorite butt for schoolboy

jokes and pranks. Larime was in great disfavor with the teachers because

he almost never had his lessons. He was also in disfavor with the college

treasurer because he did not pay his bills. Larime's father was a country

minister and could send him only a few dollars a month. The rest of his

financial necessities he was supposed to meet by sawing wood, mowing

lawns, attending furnaces, and other such odd jobs. But Larime never could

hold these jobs because he was too lazy to do them well. He was also in

high disfavor with his schoolmates, first, because of his timidity and

self-consciousness; second, because of the strange air of superiority

which, paradoxically enough, he managed to affect even in spite of these

handicaps. A little confidential consorting with this peculiar young man

soon revealed the fact that he yearned to be heralded with great acclaim

as "The Poet of the New World." Not only did he yearn; he confidently

expected it. Nay, more; he already was "The Poet of the New World," and

awaited only the day of his acknowledgment by those who, despite their

prejudices and envy, would eventually be compelled to accord him his true

position. To prove his claims, Larime read us some of his "poetry." It was

bad, very bad, and yet it was not quite bad enough to be good.

Such visions of glory as obscured Larime Hutchinson's sensible view of the

practical world are, perhaps, common enough in adolescence, and, as a

general rule, work no serious harm. There were, however, two fatal defects

of character in this case. The first was that Larime continued to dream

and to write what he thought was verse, when he ought to have been at work

plowing corn, for he had qualities which, with industry, would have made

him a successful farmer. Second, he was mentally too lazy for the drudgery

even the greatest poet must perform if he is to perfect his technique.

A MIND FOCUSSED ON DETAILS

The case of Marshall Mears, a young man who consulted us a few years ago

with reference to his ambition to become a journalist and author, well

illustrates a different phase of this same problem. This young man was of

the tall, raw-boned, vigorous, active, energetic, industrious type. There

was not a lazy bone in his body. In addition to his energy, he had unusual

powers of endurance, so that he could work fifteen, eighteen, or twenty

hours a day for weeks at a time without seeming to show any signs of

fatigue. He was ambitious for success as a writer. He was willing to work,

to work hard, to work long, to wait for recognition through years of

constant effort. He had secured a fairly good education and, in many ways,

seemed well fitted for the vocation he had chosen to pursue.

A careful examination, however, showed two fundamental deficiencies in

Marshall Mears which training could only partially overcome. First, his

was one of those narrow-gauge, single-track minds. He was incapable of any

breadth of vision. His mind was completely obsessed with details. He would

go to a lecture, or to a play, and invariably, instead of grasping the

main argument of the lecture, or the lesson of the play, he saw only a few

inconsequential details of action in the play, and remembered only stray

and somewhat irrelevant statements made by the lecturer. A novel or an

essay appealed to him in the same way. Present to him a business

proposition and his whole attention would be absorbed by some chance

remark. He was a devoted admirer of the late Elbert Hubbard and he had

longed for years to hear the great man lecture. Finally his opportunity

came and he was greatly elated, and not a little excited, as he looked

forward to what he believed to be one of the treats of a lifetime. When he

returned from the lecture, as we had feared, instead of being uplifted and

delighted, he was manifestly disappointed.

"Didn't you like the lecture?" we asked.

"I cannot understand," he complained, "why as intelligent a man as Hubbard

should split his infinitives."

Naturally, a man with a mind like this could not construct a plot or

outline an article. His writings, like his conversations, were long drawn

out, meandering and painfully tiresome recitations of trifling and, for

the most part, irrelevant detail.

We counselled him to lay aside his pen and take hold of plow handles

instead. He has since become a successful farmer, perfectly happy, working

out all the infinitude of minutiae in connection with the intensive

cultivation of small fruits.

LACK OF DISCRIMINATION A HANDICAP

Still another phase of this problem is presented by the case of N.J.F.

This man also wanted to be an editor and writer. He was a big,

fine-looking fellow, fairly well educated, had some ability in written

expression, and frequent good ideas. With his aptitudes, training, and

talents, it seemed, at first sight, that he certainly ought to be able to

succeed in an editorial capacity. Further examination showed, however, a

lamentable lack of discrimination, a deficient sense of the fitness of

things, and consequently, unreliable judgment. These deficiencies are

worse than handicaps to an editor. They are absolute disqualifications. An

editor's first duty is to discriminate, to sift, to winnow the few grains

of wheat out of the bushels of chaff that come to his mill. Editors must

have a very keen sense of the fitness of things. It is true that the

discriminating reader of newspapers and magazines may be tempted to feel

at times that this sense of the fitness of things is very rare in editors.

Unquestionably, it could be improved in many cases, and yet, on the whole,

it must be admitted that newspaper and magazine editors perform at least

one important function with a very fair degree of acceptability, namely,

they purvey material which is at least interesting to the particular class

of readers to whom they wish to appeal. If readers could be induced to

wade through for a week the masses of uninteresting material which is

submitted, they would doubtless have far greater respect for the

intelligence, criticism, peculiarities, and sense of fitness of things of

the editors.

But we digress. N.J.F. was incapable of sound judgment, not because he did

not know the facts, but because, instead of reasoning logically to his

conclusion, in accordance with the facts, he was entirely governed by his

rather erratic feelings. In other words, he could not reason well from

cause to effect; he did not understand people, and so could not sense what

would interest them, and his powers of criticism, such as he possessed,

were destructive rather than constructive.

Contrary to our advice, N.J.F. persisted in his editorial ambitions and in

time managed to persuade the owner of a certain publication to entrust him

with its editorial management. Almost immediately the periodical began to

lose subscribers. Down, down, down went its circulation until it almost

reached the vanishing point. Finally, it expired. The trouble was not that

its pages contained anything bad, harmful or illiterate, but simply that

there was page after page of dry, discursive, uninteresting, valueless

material. It was a pity, because, under a competent editor, the periodical

in question had occupied an important and useful place in the current

literature of the period, and also because, as a dealer in coal, lumber,

lime, and building materials, N.J. F. would have been a useful and

successful member of the community.

[Illustration: FIG. 33. John Masefield, Poet. Idealistic,

sentimental, dreamy, impractical, but intensely responsive to beauty,

rhythm and imagery. Has creative power. Note high, straight forehead, very

high head, fine texture, finely chiseled features, and dreamy, mystic

expression.]

[Illustration: FIG. 34. Edward DeReszke, Opera Singer. Great

artistic and musical talent, with capacity for sentiment and emotion. Note

width of brows; dome of head over temples; fulness of eyes, curves of

nose, cheeks and lips, Also large physical frame, especially chest and

abdomen.]

[Illustration: _Copyright by A. Dupont, N.Y._

FIG. 35. Puccini. Composer. Has artistic talent and creative ability

together with, energy, ambition, persistence, courage, determination.

Rather mild in disposition. Not a particularly good business man. More

interested in music than in money. Note width of forehead at eyes and at

upper corners and its narrowness between; high nose; brunette color;

square, strong jaw and chin; straight, firm mouth, and calm, determined

expression.]

[Illustration: FIG. 36. John S. Sargent, R.A., Portrait Painter.

Keen powers of observation, high ambition, great energy, fine

discrimination, excellent powers of expression, and social qualities. Note

unusual development of brows, height of head; fulness of forehead at

center; fulness of eyes, large, high nose, and fulness of backhead.]

[Illustration: _Photo by American Press Association._

FIG. 37. Pietro Mascagni. Composer. Musical, emotional sensuous,

impulsive, spasmodically energetic. Note width of forehead at brows, full

lips, dimpled chin, heavy cheeks, thick-lidded eyes, large nose, and

intense, ardent expression.]

[Illustration: FIG. 38. Richard Burton. Author. Has fine,

sentimental, idealistic, artistic and literary talents, intellectual,

creative and inventive ability, together with energy, determination, and

ambition. Note height and width of forehead; fulness back of upper

corners; large, but finely chiseled features, and thoughtfully intense,

but calm, serious, poised expression.]

[Illustration: FIG. 39. Mendelssohn, Composer. Very refined, sensitive,

responsive, emotional and delighted with appreciation and applause.

Creative, musical, capable of great industry and perseverance. Note width

of forehead at brows; large, glowing eyes; finely chiseled, regular

features; short upper lip; beautifully curved lips; high head, rounded

above temples. Compare this with Figure 20.]

[Illustration: FIG. 40. Massenet, Composer. Artistic ability, backed up

by ambition, energy, determination, courage, and persistence. Note width

of lower portion of forehead; large, well-formed nose; firm mouth, jaw and

chin; height and width of head; square hands and finger-tips. Also very

emotional and intense nature. Note round, dome-shaped head, smooth

fingers, and dreamy expression.]

THE INSANITY OF GENIUS

The greatest artists, musicians, writers, and thinkers are men of genius

and are, therefore, in a sense, abnormal. Lombroso, in his work, "The Man

of Genius," produces a great deal of interesting evidence showing the

similarity between the manifestations of genius and those of insanity.

Lombroso's conclusions have been more or less discredited, but later

investigations and practically all students agree that the true genius is

more or less an abnormality. In his case, some one or two faculties are

developed out of all reasonable proportion to the others. Naturally

enough, in such cases there is no need for a vocational counsellor. The

genius devotes himself to his music, or his painting, or his writing,

because there is nothing else he can do, nothing else in which he takes

any interest, and because the inner urge is so powerful as to be

irresistible.

But grossly deceived are those who imagine that the fire of genius burns

away any necessity for drudgery. On the other hand, genius seems to

consist very largely of a capacity for almost infinite drudgery. A

prominent engineer once said to us that all great inventions which become

commercially practicable are the joint product of a genius and a drudge,

or rather, of a genius and a corps of drudges. The genius, in a flash of

inspiration, conceives a new idea. Having conceived it, he can only sit

down and wait for a new inspiration, while the drudges take his idea, work

out its details, modify and conform it to conditions, and, finally,

harness it to the commercial wagon. This sounded well and has a great deal

of truth in it. Yet the most slavish drudge in the Edison laboratories and

factories is Edison himself. The hardest worker in all the Westinghouse

plant was Westinghouse. And who but the Wright brothers themselves made a

commercial success of the aeroplane? Sometimes, it is true, one man

conceives an idea which he is unable to work out and which must be made

practical by others, but more often than not he stumbles on the idea more

by accident than because he is looking for it. So the young man or the

young woman who has hopes of winning fame in the world of art, music, or

literature should assay himself or herself first of all for a willingness

to work, to work hard, and to work endlessly.

INDICATIONS OF ENERGY

Such energy is indicated by the large nose, high in the bridge, which

admits large quantities of oxygen into the lungs; by high cheek bones,

oftentimes by a head wide just above the ears, by square hands and

square-tipped fingers, by hard or elastic consistency of fibre.

Persistence and patience are indicated by brunette coloring and plodding

by a well-developed and rather prominent jaw and chin. Havelock Ellis and

other anthropologists have noted the fact that dark coloring is more

frequently found in artists and actors than light hair, eyes, and skin.

Artistic, musical, and literary ability are as various in their

indications as they are in their manifestations. One man is a painter,

another a sculptor, another an architect. One man paints flowers, another

landscapes, another portraits, another allegorical scenes, and still

another the rough, virile, vigorous, or even horrible and gruesome aspects

of life. One musician sings, another plays the violin, still another the

piano, and another the pipe organ. One conducts a grand opera, another

conducts a choir. One musician composes lyrics, another oratorios, another

ragtime, and still another symphonies. One man writes poetry, another

stories, another essays, another history, another philosophy, and still

another the hard, dry, mathematical facts of science. Obviously, it would

only confuse the reader were we to attempt to describe the physical

appearance of all these different classes.

INDICATIONS OF ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT

In general, we may say that an appreciation of form, color, proportion,

size, and distance is indicated by well-developed brows, broad and full at

the outer angles, and by eyes set rather widely apart. But size, form,

color, and proportion are but the mediums through which the artist's soul

conveys its message. Whether or not one has the soul which can conceive a

worthy message is indicated by the expression of the eyes, an expression

which cannot be described but which, once seen and recognized, can never

afterward be mistaken.

Inherent capacity for music is indicated by a forehead wide at the brows.

Going over the portraits of all the famous composers and performers, you

will find that while they differ in most other particulars, they are all

alike in the proportionate width of the forehead at the brows. The kind

and quality of music one may create depends partially upon training and

partially upon the kind and quality of his soul, which, again, expresses

itself in the eyes.

Capacity for literature and expression is indicated by fulness of the eye,

by heighth and width of the forehead, and, perhaps, especially by the

development of the head and forehead at the sides just above the temples

and back of the hair line. Any portrait gallery of great authors will show

this development in nine out of ten (see figures).

The artistic, musical, or literary man with fine, silken hair, fine,

delicate skin, small and finely chiselled features, and a general

daintiness of build will express refinement, beauty, tender sentiments,

and sensitiveness in his work, while the man with coarse, bushy or wavy

hair, coarse, thick skin, large, rugged features, and a general ruggedness

and clumsiness of build, even when his size is small, will express vigor,

virility, ruggedness, and even gruesomeness and horror, in his work. There

may be in his productions a wild, virile type of beauty, as in the music

of Wagner and the sculpture of Rodin, but the keynote of his work is

elemental force.

The dilettante has conical hands, with small, tapering fingers; this is

the hand which is popularly supposed to accompany artistic temperament.

He loves art. He appreciates art. He may even win fame and fortune as a

competent critic of art, but he cannot create it. Your true artist has

square, competent hands, with blunt, square-tipped fingers. The hands

shown in figure 57 page 317 are those of a music lover who can neither

play nor sing. Those in figure 58 are the hands of a true artist on the

piano and pipe organ. The true producing artist nearly always has square

hands, with large thumbs set near the wrist, thus giving a wide reach

between tip of thumb and tip of forefinger, as shown in figure 58. Actors

and operatic singers sometimes have conical hands, with tapering fingers.

They express emotion and beauty with voice, gesture, and facial expression

rather than with their hands.

In the world of art and literature many are called but few are chosen. The

pathway to the heights is steep and rugged and there are many pitfalls.

There are many by-paths. Furthermore, it is cold and lonesome on the

mountain-top. Before anyone sets out on the perilous journey he should

read Jack London's "Martin Eden," Louis M. Alcott's autobiography, the

story of Holman Hunt, the Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, and the

biographies of others who have attained fame in these fields.

Analyzing Character The New Science of Judging Men; Misfits in Business, the Home and Social Life · 第 9 / 14 章