Preble’s History of the Flag, 259 _et seq._

Footnote 18:

Journals of Congress (W. C. Ford, editor), 1907, VII, 59.

Footnote 19:

Austin’s Life of Elbridge Gerry, vol. 1, p. 336.

Footnote 20:

When the committee was appointed from which emanated in 1782 the seal

finally accepted, a memorandum, endorsed “proceedings respect^g. a

seal of the United States Mr. Middleton Mr. Boudinot Mr. Lee,” was

made by Lovell for the committee’s use, showing from the papers in the

office of the Secretary of Congress what had already been done in the

matter of the seal. After setting forth the action of 1776 it states

that the Lovell committee was appointed March 25, _1779_, and the

report is given as follows:

“Original Report of May 10 1779

the Seal to be 4 inches Diametre On one Side The arms of the United

States as follows The Shield charged on the Field with 13 diagonal

Stripes alternate red & white—Supporters, dexter, a Warriour holding a

Sword; Sinister a Figure representing Peace bearing an Olive

Branch—The Crest a radiant Constellation of 13 Stars—The motto Bello

vel Paci—The legend round the Atchievement Seal of the United States

“On the Reverse—The Figure of Liberty seated in a Chair holding the

Staff & cap. The motto Semper—Underneath MDCCLXXVI”

The memorandum also says that on May 17 “The Report of the Com^{tee}.

on the Device of a great Seal was taken into Consideration and after

Debate Ordered, That it be recommitted.”

Evidently an error was made in the dates by Lovell when he transcribed

the memorandum. A committee appointed in _1779_, if its report had

been submitted May 10, _1779_, and recommitted May 17, _1779_, could

hardly have made a second report May 10, _1780_, to have it

recommitted May 17, _1780_. The MS. journal for March 25, 1780, says:

“_Ordered_, That the report of the committee on the device of a great

Seal for the United States in Congress assembled, be referred to a

committee of three:

“The members chosen, Mr. Lovell, Mr. Scott and Mr. Houston.”

The MS. journal for May 17, 1780, says:

“The report of the committee on the device of a seal was taken into

consideration; and after debate,

“_Ordered_, That it be recommitted.”

Footnote 21:

Pennsylvania Magazine, X, 414.

Footnote 22:

Note by Barton: “In the Arms of Scotland, as marshalled in the Royal

Atchievement, the double Tressure which surrounds the Lion is borne

_flory_ and _counter flory_ (with Fleurs-de-lis); which is in

Consequence of a Treaty that was entered into, between Charlemagne,

then Emperor & King of France, and Achaius King of Scotland; to denote

that the French Lillies should guard & defend the Scottish Lion.”

Footnote 23:

Totten, I, 104, 108; Mass. Hist. Soc. Proceedings, 1866–1867, p. 351.

Footnote 24:

Note by Henry Livingston Thomas, late Translator, Department of State.

Footnote 25:

Note by Barton: “As the Pales or Pallets consist of an uneven Number,

they ought, in strictness, to be blazoned—Arg^t. 6 Pallets gules: but

as the 13 pieces allude to the thirteen States, they are blazoned

according to the Number of _pieces paleways_.”

Footnote 26:

Vol. II, p. 656.

Footnote 27:

The history of the seal of the United States · 第 42 / 49 题