DESIGNS OF THE SECOND COMMITTEE

[Reduced one-half]

Face p. 19

]

The American minister to France, Silas Deane, complained of the

informality and impropriety of the representatives of the sovereignty of

a nation being without a seal with which to authenticate their official

acts, but the subject was treated with indifference. On January 23,

1777, a committee appointed to examine the files of Congress, William

Ellery of Rhode Island, chairman, selected certain papers which it

thought required the consideration of Congress—among them the “Report on

a Device for a public seal”[18]—but it was not until March 25, 1780,

that the report was taken up again, when James Lovell of Massachusetts,

John Morin Scott of Virginia, and William Churchill Houston of New

Jersey were appointed a committee to report a design for a great seal,

and to them was referred the report of the first committee. The chairman

of the committee and the most important member was Lovell. He was a

Boston school-teacher and a graduate of Harvard College. Being

imprisoned by the British after the battle of Bunker Hill, he was later

exchanged and entered Congress in December, 1776, where he served till

1782, being for a long time on the Committee of Foreign Affairs. While

serving on this committee he must have received Deane’s complaint that

Congress had no seal. Lovell was regarded as a man of great learning,

but was extremely eccentric in his manners and speech.[19] The committee

reported May 10:

The Com̃ittee to whom was referred on the 25^{th} of March last the

report of a former Com̃ittee on the Device of a Great Seal for the

United States in Congress assembled, beg Leave to report the following

Description.

The history of the seal of the United States · 第 11 / 49 题