[Illustration: A. NEUHUYS

By the Cradle]

=A Characteristic Picture by Christoffel Bisschop.=--Christoffel

Bisschop (1828-1904) may be studied by The Lord Gave and the Lord hath

Taken Away, Sunday in Hindeloopen, Sister of the Bride, and Winter in

Friesland, also called Repairing Skates. This is a very characteristic

and typical picture. Friesland is not only the home of a peculiar style

of brightly painted furniture, but also the home of a school of skating

of which there are two schools,--the Dutch and the Frisian. The latter,

which is the older, aims at speed; and the skater wears a peculiar kind

of skate, well shown on the foot of the young girl seated on the right,

who is having the other skate repaired. The carved and colored sledges

are also typical of Friesland. An escort waits at the door. The painter

was himself a native of Friesland, and therefore depicts the costumes,

furniture, houses, and people of this most picturesque corner of Holland

with accuracy, charm, and sympathy.

[Illustration: BISSCHOP

Winter in Friesland]

=Christoffel Bisschop.=--Christoffel Bisschop is the Dutch colorist _par

excellence_. He entered the studio of Schmidt in Delft, and worked at

The Hague under Huib van Hove. He also studied in Paris with Le Comte

and Gleyre, and in 1855 established himself in The Hague. A visit to the

quaint town of Hindeloopen charmed his artistic eye, and henceforth the

peasants, with their gay costumes, and the brightly painted furniture

and quaint houses, have furnished themes and settings for his pictures.

=H. W. Mesdag.=--Born in Groningen in 1831, Hendrick Willem Mesdag was

destined to follow the family business of banking. Art, however, claimed

him; and after painting for several years as an amateur he started work

in Brussels in 1866. Except for the criticisms of Roelofs, Alma-Tadema,

and other artists, Mesdag may be said to be self-taught. In 1869 he

removed to The Hague, so that he could be near Scheveningen, for he had

found his special talent. "I must go and live near the sea," he said,

"gaze upon it daily, not only for weeks, but for months and years; watch

and study its every movement, this ever-changing element, this amazing,

stupendous work of the Almighty!" In 1870 he exhibited at the Paris

Salon, and his Breakers in the North Sea received the gold medal. His

fame was now established. France has decorated Mesdag more than once,

and one of his sea pictures hangs in the Luxembourg.

=His Style.=--Mesdag is a realist, and with broad, bold strokes of the

brush he portrays what he sees and feels. He depicts the ever-changing

ocean in all its moods, at all times of day and in all seasons; and the

life of the fisherfolk on the shore and in the fishing-boats is also

treated with sympathy. His Calm Sea by Sunset, painted in 1878, and

Fishing-boats at Sea and Beach, the two latter painted in 1895, belong

to this gallery.

"High up in the scale, and standing somewhat apart, is Henry William

Mesdag, the marine painter. Into a branch of art which had been

treated in so masterly a fashion in former centuries by Willem van de

Velde and Van Capelle, not to speak of Lodewijk Backhuysen and

Bonaventure Peeters, he introduced a thorough reform. In the beginning

of the century he was preceded by men of note, such as Schotel,

Waldorp, Meyer, Greive, Van Heemskerck, Van Beest, Van Deventer; but

their chief aim was to remain true to the tradition of the great

period. They painted pretty little ships sailing on calm seas, their

white sails catching a gentle breeze and reflecting the rays of the

sun; or again they would paint large vessels, driven before a gale

over mountainous waves. But the one was as artificial as the other;

their water was like glass, their ships as if made of tin, their skies

seemed cut out of oilcloth, and not one showed that he felt any love

for the sea.

"Mesdag was the first to paint the sea as it is, the turbulent,

restless, omnipotent, unlimited sea, that free, majestic, and

mysterious element which cannot be brought within any formula, but can

only be rendered in its tossing and pitching, peopled by its 'children

of the sea' living on its shores or drifting on its billows. He

studied every movement of the waves, every tint of the water, every

change in the ever-changing sky; he bade good-bye to large vessels,

huge castles of the sea, and took to painting small ships and fishing

smacks, the cottages, so to speak, of the ocean. His painting is as

broad and manly as the element wherein he moves and the space it

covers; not as soft and transparent as the works of landscape

painters,--those who give us meadows and downs,--but yet a

revelation."[29]

[Illustration: MESDAG

Sunrise on the Dutch Coast]

=Other Works in the Stedelijk by Modern Artists.=--Other works by modern

artists worthy of attention are: Canal in Amsterdam and Sinking Piles

for the Erection of a House, by G. H. Breitner (1857); Te Deum Laudamus,

Groote Kerk at The Hague, Oude Kerk at Amsterdam, Groote Kerk at Edam,

and Barn-floor in Guelderland, by J. Bosboom (1817-91); Mother and

Child, by B. J. Blommers (1845); Arrival of the Water Gueux at Leyden,

by C. Rochussen (1814-94); Episode from the Siege of Leyden, Battle at

Castricum, and Mellis Stoke Presenting his Rhymed Chronicle to Floris

V., Count of Holland, by K. Klinkenberg (1852); River Scene in Winter,

by L. Apol (1850); Scheveningen in Rainy Weather, by S. L. Verveer

(1850); Queen Fredegonda and St. Praetextatus, by Alma-Tadema (1836);

Mary Magdalen at the Foot of the Cross, by Ary Scheffer (1795-1858); A

Landscape, by H. van de Sande Bakhuijzen (1795-1860); Church at

Zandvoort, View in Enkhuizen, Town Hall in Cologne, and Heeren-Gracht at

Amsterdam, by C. Springer (1818-91); and A Prison of the Spanish Period,

and Norwegian Women Bringing their Children to be Christened, by H. A.

van Trigt (1829).

=A Survey of Modern Dutch Art.=--A brief survey of modern Dutch art,

condensed from the learned pen of Max Rooses, will not be unwelcome,

particularly as we shall meet many more examples of the modern artists.

=The French Neo-Classical School.=--He tells us that the group of Dutch

and Belgian figure-painters of the beginning of the century were

descendants of the French neo-classical school; and until 1850 the

principles of David, Gros, and Girodet were highly respected. The

best-known representatives were John William Pieneman in Holland, and

Bree, Navez, and Paelinck in Belgium.

=The Romantic School.=--Thereupon followed the Romantic school, whose

leaders in France were Eugene Delacroix, Horace Vernet, and Descamps; in

Belgium, Wappers and De Keyser; in Holland, Huib van Hove, Herman Ten

Cate, Charles Rochussen, Stroebel, and Van Trigt. This school departed

from the academic tendency of its predecessors, just as romantic

literature declared war against classicism in poetry.

=The Secret of the Success of the Romanticists.=--Another source helped

to swell the stream of Romanticism in Holland. The artists of the

neo-classical school, with their pompous but severe forms, paid more

attention to line than to color. They took their example from the

Italians of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Their successors set

themselves to study the masters of their own country, and learned to

appreciate the rich coloring, the warm lights, and harmonious tones of

the golden period of their own art. We can see that they were filled

with admiration for the effects of light and color in Rembrandt's works

and in those of De Hooch, Gerrit Dou, and Ter Borch.

Not only did they find subjects for rich and warm coloring and pleasing

treatment in the history of former days, but also in that of their own

times. They took, in fact, a great step forward in that they observed

the daily life around them, and kept in touch with their

fellow-creatures, their ways and habits. To this group belongs Hubert

van Hove, who was the first to admire the works of the old masters, and

again to carry on the broken tradition; Charles Rochussen, Stroebel, to

whom the effects of light and color were particularly attractive; and

Herman Ten Cate and Van Trigt, the talented painters of romantic scenes

derived from history.

[Illustration: ISRAELS

Old Jewish Peddler]

=Josef Israels, a Brilliant Painter in this Group.=--To this group

belongs Josef Israels in his earliest works. During this period of his

brilliant career he was filled with enthusiasm for all that is sweet,

joyous, and charming in the world, all that is fair in youth and nature;

this is the period of his Children of the Sea, his Fishwomen, and his

Knitting Girls. Later his subjects became more serious, and more

serious, too, the claims of his art. Many followed Israels's example.

The group of admirers of the master, those who saw the world as he

did,--though with their own eyes,--may be called the pith and kernel of

the young Dutch school. Blommers, Valkenburg, Neuhuys, and Artz may be

placed at the head. They did not take life quite so sadly, they did not

wish to obscure light and color but allowed the sun to blaze and triumph

over mystery and darkness.

=A New Party opposed to the Romanticists.=--In opposition to these

"champions of twilight and tenderness" arose those who preferred the

real and substantial: Breitner; Sosselin de Jong, the portrait-painter;

Witkamp; Therese Schwartze, and Van der Waay.

A similar movement took place in landscape-painting. The most important

landscape-artists in the first half of the nineteenth century were

Kobell, Koekkoek, and Schelfhout. Their great ideal was a careful,

almost painful, working out of detail; they selected subjects rich in

material, masses of big trees against water, producing great effects of

light and shade. They sought to captivate the eye by an abundance of

detail, and to depict woods and meadows with a smoothness which was more

artificial than natural.

=Bilders, Roelofs, and their Followers.=--What was called the

picturesque in a landscape became unnecessary to the younger men of the

newer school; they painted Nature in its own beauty and in the

simplicity of its charm, as they saw it in their daily lives. Of this

group Bilders is the most important. He admired in the landscape, not a

favorite spot, or a pretty pool, or a gayly colored cow; he saw rather

land and meadow and wood in the mass, as one whole, beautiful by reason

of its grand lines, its rich tones. William Roelofs went a step further;

his first works differ little from those of his predecessors, but by

degrees he tore himself away from the accepted style and became a true

reformer. It was no longer the color or the beautiful contours of a view

that attracted him, but the country itself, the vegetation, the verdure,

the cattle in the meadows, the sky that seems always holiday-making, the

ever-changing clouds, always full of beauty.

A whole school followed in this new track,--Van de Sande Bakhuijzen,

Mevrouw Bilders van Bosse and Mevrouw Mesdag, Van Borselen,

Storlenbeker, Gabriel, who depicted with extraordinary fidelity both

land and sea; John Vrolijk, whose cows are always grazing in sunny

meadows under a brilliantly blue sky; De Haas, whose cattle are more

heavy and massive; Du Chattel, who prefers the effect of light in Spring

and in Autumn; Apol, who devotes himself almost exclusively to snow

scenes, producing singularly charming effects of the sun shining upon

monotonous whiteness; Mari Ten Kate, De Bock, Wijsmuller, Weissenbruch,

and Tholen.

=Another Step in the Modern Direction.=--Another step in the modern

direction was taken by artists who gave themselves up entirely to the

impression of the landscape, and painted exactly what they saw; Ter

Meulen, for instance, who loves Nature for the mood which she awakes in

him, and who understands so well how to convey light and tone into his

clever and refined pictures; Anton Mauve, and the brothers William and

Jacob Maris, were also accomplished interpreters of nature, and all that

lives and moves therein.

[Illustration: J. MARIS

Two Windmills]

=Modern Dutch Painters pursuing Independent Lines.=--Of other modern

Dutch painters pursuing different lines may be mentioned Bosboom, who

devoted himself chiefly to the interiors of old churches, bringing out

the play of light and shadow among the pillars; Klinkenberg, who paints

Dutch streets and canals and the old buildings upon them in full

sunshine; Jansen, who paints the Amsterdam docks and quays; Alma-Tadema,

painter of classical scenes; Bisschop, the great colorist; David Bles,

"the witty portrayer of morals and manners of years ago"; Henrietta

Ronner-Knip, the famous painter of cats and dogs; Henkes, who depicts in

grayish tones old-fashioned scenes and characters; Bakker Korff, who

paints similar scenes, but in miniature; the brothers Oyens; Elchanon

Verveer, painter of jolly old fishermen; Sadee; Mejuffrouw van de Sande

Bakhuijzen, and Mejuffrouw Roosenboom, painters of flowers and fruit;

Eerelman and Van Essen, the animal painters; Allebe, the colorist,

painter of human figures and animals; and Kaemmerer, who is fond of

painting figures in the costumes of the Directoire.

FOOTNOTES:

[27] H. Smissaert.

[28] G. H. Marius.

[29] H. Smissaert.

THE TOWN HALL, HAARLEM

FROM AMSTERDAM TO HAARLEM

It would be well now to make a day's trip to Haarlem. The steam tram

takes us through an interesting country, and in about an hour we reach

the centre of the town,--the Groote Markt,--in which are several old

buildings, the meat market, the Groote Kerk, and the Town Hall. The

latter is the chief object of our visit to Haarlem, for it contains ten

large pictures by Frans Hals, which no admirer of this great master can

afford to neglect.

The Town Hall, facing the Groote Kerk, was originally a palace of the

counts of Holland. It was begun in the twelfth century, but was

remodelled in 1620 and 1630, when a wing was added. Some of the large

beams in the interior date from the thirteenth century. The walls of the

vestibule are decorated with coats of arms and portraits of the counts

and countesses of Holland.

=The Room containing Hals's Doelen Pictures.=--We pass at once into the

principal room, where the famous Regent (or _Doelen_) pictures by Hals

are arranged in chronological order. These pictures represent nearly all

the artist's working period. The Banquet of the Officers of the Guild of

the Archers of St. George was painted in 1616, when the artist was

thirty-five; the same subject, with different portraits, in 1627; the

Banquet of the Officers of the Arquebusiers of St. Andrew, in 1622, when

the corps departed for the siege of Hasselt and Mons; Reunion of the

Arquebusiers of St. Andrew, in 1633; and Officers and Sub-Officers of

the Arquebusiers of St. George, in 1639.

[Illustration: FRANS HALS

Reunion of the Arquebusiers of St. Andrew]

As the enormous canvases each contain from fourteen to twenty life-size

portraits, we feel as if we were entering a hall full of convivial

officers, laughing, jesting, and making merry over their fine wines and

choice food. They are richly dressed; many of them wear lace cuffs and

ruffs and bright scarfs; flags flutter, spears glitter, spurs and swords

clank and flash in the sunlight; the plumes on the large hats nod; and

loud talk and bursts of laughter seem to issue from the frames. These

convivial men have fought against the hated Spaniards, and are ready to

trail a pike at any moment. The artist was commanded to paint each man

accurately and according to his rank in the company. Every picture is,

therefore, a group of portraits; and Colonel Jan Claasz Loo, in the

picture of 1633, is considered one of Hals's masterpieces of

portraiture. These pictures rank with Rembrandt's and Van der Helst's

works of this class.

In addition to these are Regents of the Hospital of St. Elizabeth

(1641), Regents of the Old Men's Almshouse, and Lady Regents of the Old

Men's Almshouse, both painted in 1664, when Hals was over eighty. Two

fine portraits of Nicholas van der Meer, Burgomaster of Haarlem, and his

wife, are dated 1631. A copy of a portrait of Frans Hals by himself

hangs in an adjoining room.

=Crowe on Hals's Earlier and Later Styles.=--"In every form of his art

we can distinguish his earlier style from that of later years. Two

Boys Playing and Singing, in the Gallery of Cassel, and A Banquet of

Officers, in the Museum of Haarlem, exhibit him as a careful

draughtsman, capable of great finish, yet spirited withal. His flesh,

less clear than it afterwards became, is pastose and burnished.

Further on he becomes more effective, displays more freedom of hand

and a greater command of effect. At this period we note the beautiful

full-length of a young lady of the Berensteyn family in the house of

that name in Haarlem, and a splendid full-length of A Patrician

Leaning on a Sword, in the Lichtenstein Collection at Vienna. Both

these pictures are equalled by the Banquets of Officers of 1627, and a

Meeting of the Company of St. George, of 1633, in the Haarlem Museum.

A picture of the same kind in the Town Hall of Amsterdam, with the

date of 1637, suggests some study of the masterpieces of Rembrandt,

and a similar influence is apparent in a picture of 1641 at Haarlem,

representing the Regents of the Company of St. Elizabeth....

Rembrandt's example did not create a lasting impression on Hals. He

gradually dropped more and more into gray and silvery harmonies of

tone; and two of his canvases, executed in 1664,--the Regents and

Regentesses of the Oudemannenhuis, at Haarlem,--are masterpieces of

color, though in substance they are but monochromes."

=His Pictures of Various Strata of Society.=--"Hals's pictures

illustrate the various strata of society into which his misfortunes

led him. His banquets or meetings of officers, of sharpshooters and

guildsmen, are the most interesting of his works. But they are not

more characteristic than his low-life pictures of itinerant players

and singers. His portraits of gentlefolk are true and noble, but

hardly so expressive as those of fishwives and tavern heroes. His

first master was Van Mander, the painter and historian, of whom he

possessed some pictures. But he soon left behind him the practice of

the time illustrated by Schoreel and Moro, and, emancipating himself

gradually from tradition, produced pictures remarkable for truth and

dexterity of hand."

=Hals and Rembrandt compared.=--"We prize in Rembrandt the golden glow

of effects based upon artificial contrasts of low light in

immeasurable gloom. Hals was fond of daylight, of silvery sheen. Both

men were painters of touch, but of touch on different keys. Rembrandt

was the bass, Hals the treble. The latter is, perhaps, more expressive

than the former. He seizes with rare intuition a moment in the life of

his sitters. What nature displays in that moment he reproduces

thoroughly in a very delicate scale of color, and with a perfect

mastery over every form of expression. He becomes so clever at last

that exact tone, light and shade, and modelling are all obtained with

a few marked and fluid strokes of the brush."

=The Other Corporation Pictures.=--The other Corporation pictures will

not detain us; but while here we can take a hasty glance at A. Brouwer's

Binnenhuis; Jan Steen's Peasants' _Kermesse_; Philips Wouwermans's Stags

and Goats; Molenaer's Rustic Wedding; F. Hals the Younger's Binnenhuis;

Pieter Aertsen's Children in the Fiery Furnace; A. Backer's Semiramis;

Cornelis Bega's Street Musicians; Gerrit Berckheyde's Groote Markt in

Haarlem and Fish Market in Haarlem; Job Berckheyde's Groote Kerk,

Haarlem, and Joseph and his Brothers in Egypt; Bloemaert's Message to

the Shepherds; Pieter Claez's Still Life; Jacques de Claen, Fruits;

Droochsloot's _Kermesse_; A. van Everdingen's Street in Haarlem; H.

Goltzius's Titus; G. W. Heda's Still Life; G. van Honthorst's Singer;

Hendrik Meyer's Groote Markt, Haarlem; P. de Molyn's Pillaged and

Burning Village; Isaac van Nickele's Groote Kerk, Haarlem; Isaac

Ouwater's Groote Markt, Haarlem; Christoffel Pierson's Hunting

Attributes; Isaac Ruisdael's Holland Dunes and Landscape in the Dunes;

Saenredam's Nieuwe Kerk, Haarlem; P. van Santvoort's Winter Landscape;

J. van Scorel's Adam and Eve, St. Cecilia Playing the Organ, and

Christ's Baptism in the Jordan; Jacob van der Ulft's The Forum of Nerva,

Rome; Esais van de Velde's Landscape; Jan Wijnants's Landscape; Thomas

Wyck's Roman Ruins; and many portraits by Maes, Jan Weenix, Jan Victors,

Verkolje, Ter Borch, Ravesteyn, Pot, Netscher, Mierevelt, T. de Keijser,

and other famous Dutch artists.

=The Teyler Museum.=--We can afford to neglect the Teyler Museum, unless

we are particularly interested in the study of modern Dutch art. In that

case, we can view there some excellent examples of Israels, Mauve,

Mesdag, Ten Cate, J. Koster, Bosboom, Verveer, Eeckhout, Koekkoek, and

others. The Teyler Museum also contains a valuable collection of

engravings and drawings by old masters, including Rembrandt,

Michelangelo, Goltzius, and A. van Ostade.

=The Paviljoen Welgelegen.=--Taking the tram to Frederiks-Park, we may

glance at the Paviljoen Welgelegen, a _chateau_ built in 1788 by Mr.

Hope, an Amsterdam banker, and which was purchased by Louis Napoleon

when he became King of Holland. It was to this building that the modern

pictures were removed from the Trippenhuis in 1838. This now shelters a

Colonial Museum and a Museum of Industrial Art, both of great interest.

THE BOIJMANS MUSEUM, ROTTERDAM

THE MUSEUM'S ORIGIN AND GROWTH

The Boijmans (or Boymans) Museum, on the Schiedamsche Dyk, was founded

by a bequest of Mr. F. J. O. Boijmans, who died in 1847. His fine

collection of 360 paintings suffered by fire in 1864, and only 163 of

them were left. These were housed in a new building, completed in 1867.

By means of various bequests and purchases, the collection has been

increased to more than four hundred paintings and two thousand drawings

and engravings. The ground-floor contains the drawings and engravings,

the Library of Rotterdam (30,000 volumes), and the Portrait-room. The

upper floor consists of six galleries, two of which are devoted to

modern pictures.

=Two Classes of Landscapes in this Museum.=--The Boijmans Museum is rich

in landscapes. These naturally fall into two classes: first, the works

of those men who studied in Italy or at least owed their inspiration to

others who did; and secondly, pictures of purely Dutch scenery with the

peasants, flocks, and herds familiar to the native. The classical

landscapes are framed with mountains, and usually have cascades and

ruins, and often are peopled with nymphs, shepherds, and other figures

classically draped. Many examples of this school have already been noted

in The Hague and Amsterdam museums.

=Painters of Italian Landscapes.=--Jan Miel (1599-1664) went to Rome and

studied under Andreas Sacchi. His Italian Landscape, alive with

travellers, is similar in feeling and treatment to many others in this

gallery by Jan van de Meer, Jr., Adam Pynacker, J. Lingelbach, Jacob van

Huchtenburgh, Willem de Heusch, Jan Hackaert, J. van Bronckhorst, Pieter

Bout, Jan Both, Adriaen Bloemaert, and Johannes van der Bent. In many of

these classical landscapes the figures are supplied by A. van de Velde

and Lingelbach.

=Poelenburg's Figure-painting.=--Poelenburg painted the figures in the

pictures of some of his contemporaries,--in the Rocky Landscape by

Willem de Heusch, for instance. In this panel we find the usual road

with women, children, cattle, sheep, goats, trees, cascade, rocks

covered with vegetation, shepherd with flock, travellers with a

pack-mule, and mountainous background.

=A. Bloemaert's Italian Landscape.=--Adriaen Bloemaert (d. 1668) painted

historical subjects and landscape. His Italian Landscape exhibits goats

on rocks covered with vegetation in the foreground, from which a road

rises to a castle on a mountain. A man and a child are coming down the

road. The background is mountainous.

The Standard Galleries - Holland · 第 17 / 23 段