CHAPTER I.

[Cover Illustration]

THE

TYPE-WRITER GIRL

BY

OLIVE PRATT RAYNER

LONDON

C. ARTHUR PEARSON LIMITED

HENRIETTA STREET W.C.

1897

TO

THEODORE RAYNER

AND

OLIVER WENDELL PRATT,

A WIFE’S HOMAGE,

A SISTER’S LOVE.

CONTENTS

CHAP. PAGE

I. —INTRODUCES A LATTER-DAY HEROINE 9

II. —THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE 18

III. —ENVIRONMENT WINS 29

IV. —THE CHOICE OF A PATRON 41

V. —VIVE L’ANARCHIE! 47

VI. —THE INNER BROTHERHOOD 60

VII. —A MUTINOUS MUTINEER 68

VIII. —CALLED “OF ACCIDENTS” 83

IX. —I PLAY CARMEN 95

X. —SIC ME SERVAVIT APOLLO! 104

XI. —A SAIL ON THE HORIZON 114

XII. —A CAVALIER MAKES ADVANCES 131

XIII. —CONCERNING ROMEO 137

XIV. —“NOW BARABBAS WAS A PUBLISHER” 145

XV. —FRESH LIGHT ON ROMEO 155

XVI. —I TRY LITERATURE 165

XVII. —A DRAWN BATTLE 176

XVIII. —AN AUTUMN HOLIDAY 194

XIX. —“O ROMEO, ROMEO!” 203

XX. —“WHEREFORE ART THOU ROMEO?” 223

XXI. —ENVOY PLENIPOTENTIARY 242

XXII. —I CLING TO THE RIGGING 253

NEW 3s. 6d. BOOKS.

(TO APPEAR SHORTLY.)

_____

=The Invisible Man.=

By H. G. WELLS.

_____

=Fortune’s Footballs.=

By G. B. BURGIN.

_____

=The Skipper’s Wooing.=

By W. W. JACOBS.

_____

=John of Strathbourne.=

By R. D. CHETWODE.

THE TYPE-WRITER GIRL.

CHAPTER I.

INTRODUCES A LATTER-DAY HEROINE.

I was twenty-two, and without employment.

I would not say by this that I was without occupation. In the world in

which we live, set with daisies and kingfishers and undeciphered faces

of men and women, I doubt I could be at a loss for something to occupy

me. A swallow’s back, as he turns in the sunshine, is so full of

meaning. If you dwell in the country, you need but pin on a hat and slip

out into a meadow, and there, in some bight of the hedgerow, you shall

see spring buds untwisting, sulphur butterflies coquetting; hear

nightingales sing as they sang to Keats, and streamlets make madrigal as

they wimpled for Marlowe. Nay, even here in London, where life is rarer,

how can I cruise down the Strand without encountering strange

barks—mysterious argosies that attract and intrigue me? That living

stream is so marvellous! Whence come they, these shadows, and whither do

they go?—innumerable, silent, each wrapped in his own thought, yet each

real to himself as I to my heart. To me, they are shooting stars,

phantoms that flash athwart the orbit of my life one second, and then

vanish. But to themselves they are the centre of a world—of _the_

world; and I am but one of the meteors that dart across their horizon.

I cannot choose but wonder who each is, and why he is here. For one

after another I invent a story. It may not be the true story, but at

least it amuses me. Every morning I see them stream in from the Unknown,

by the early trains, and disperse like sparks that twinkle on the thin

soot of the chimney-back—men with small black bags, bound for

mysterious offices. What happens in those offices I have no idea: they

may lend money, or buy shares, or promote Christian knowledge. I only

know I see them come in the morning and flit again at night, sometimes

the same figures, recognisably identical. They rush back, absorbed, to

catch the train to the Unknown, as they rushed up from it earlier. So,

day after day, the tide sets and ebbs; while I stand on the shore of the

vast sea of London like a child that watches. And Commissioner Lin

guards me.

I have always been grateful to Mr. Samuel Butler for his eccentric

theory that a woman wrote the Odyssey. I do not say that I agree with

him; if I did, I am not aware that any critic would attach the least

importance to my opinion. But it is a soothing theory for us latter-day

women. Without thinking it true, I love to believe it. The Odyssey, you

will grant, is the epic of the imagination. It is the epic of mystery.

In the Iliad, which is the epic of fact, everything is clear-cut,

distinct, commonplace. I do not conceive that a woman could have written

the Iliad. Its theme would fail to interest her. That hard handplay of

battle counts for nought to our sex. Clang of bronze sword on ringing

shield rouses no echo in our heart or brain. It is a masculine poem. How

practical it is, how cold, how everyday, how mannish! Considering its

august age, how little it gleams with the glamour of antiquity! Ulysses

in the Iliad is just a shifty politician, an adroit public speaker.

Achilles is just a petulant, ill-disciplined young warrior—I have met

him in London, fresh home from the Transvaal. The whole mighty saga is a

saga of men’s ideas, so sharp is it in its outlines, so historical, so

definite. But the Odyssey!

Yes, I read in it clearly the fine hand of a woman. It has the

vagueness, the elusiveness, the melting, hazy charm of feminine craft.

It thrills with mystery; and woman is the mystic. Look at its glorious

dimness. You descry its geography in veiled outline only, as one beholds

the Paps of Jura on a day of sea-fog through swaying sheets of white

cloud from a fisherman’s boat on the Bay of Oban. It is a Celtic

dreamland. From morning to night, in that enchanted poem, on and on we

sail, past uncertain isles or dubious blue headlands, begirt with

fantastic forms, and in perils of the sea more awesome than the real.

Architects have reconstructed Priam’s palace, I believe, from the

description in the Iliad. That is man’s way of describing. But who could

reconstruct, from the rapt words of the Odyssey, Circe’s island or the

gardens of Alcinous? Peering and prying Schliemann found in the

battle-epic a whole plan of the Troad; or, at least, read one into it:

fancy even imagining you could construct a chart of the Mediterranean to

show the homeward maze of the much-travelled wanderer from Ilion to

Ithaca! The bare idea would indicate a misconception of the Odyssey. For

those are the seas and islands that never were; they live but in the

ghost-geography of poets and women.

As arguments, indeed, the proofs adduced seem to me preposterous. It is

nonsense to say that in the Odyssey the chief _rôle_ is played by women.

Do women’s books deal exclusively, or even mainly, with their own sex?

Is not the Titan man, the strong, sardonic, woman-quelling hero, a

recognised commonplace of women’s fancy? I do not believe an Ithacan

lady wrote the Odyssey _because_ of the relative importance of Penelope

and Nausicaa. Surely even a man might have set Penelope at her web, or

Nausicaa at her tennis. In that I see nothing occult or esoterically

feminine. Men must be aware that every Circe has the power of turning

men into swine. They ought to know; they have seen it done daily. No,

those are not the reasons that weigh with me. It is the wonder, the

magic, the purple mystery, of the Odyssey that tells to my mind in

favour of its female authorship. And though I know Mr. Samuel Butler’s

theory is not true, I thank God I am woman enough none the less to

embrace it.

But what has all this to do with my story—the story I am setting out in

my own fashion to tell you? A great deal; and besides, unless you let me

tell it in my own wayward way, I can never get through with it. In that

respect also I hold myself true woman. And this is the connection. “If

only we could have lived in those days!” people say. I answer, “You

_are_ living in them.” It is not the days, not the places, not the

things that change, but we who see them otherwise. Consider, the

Mediterranean is the same sea to-day as when the Ithacan lady who wrote

the Odyssey looked out upon its blue zones to behold it peopled with

strange forms and wizard shadows. For that nameless Sappho, that

prehistoric Charlotte Brontë, that inchoate Elizabeth Barrett Browning,

the Ionian main swarmed alive with Gorgons and Harpies as Loch Fyne with

herrings. Sirens sang on every rock to lure the seaman; promontories

glowed red at set of sun with the forges of the Cyclops. You may steam

down the prosaic Adriatic to-day in an Austrian Lloyd steamer—a

fearsome Behemoth, bellowing, snorting, flame-breathing—and identify

those charmed shores of Hellenic fancy, as laid down, with soundings, in

the Admiralty surveys. But that is your blindness. Scylla and Charybdis

are there as of old: ’tis you who turn them into the Straits of Messina.

Polyphemus still haunts his seaward cave: ’tis you who transform him

into a custom-house officer. Adventures are to the adventurous. Go

through the world in search of Calypso, and you will surely find her. Be

modern, and you will find only Willesden Junction. That may suffice for

you. I live in “those days,” as all lovers of the mystical have always

lived in them.

And I will go forth into the world in search of adventures. They are

sure to come to me; for faith moves mountains. In every age, when the

Princess Cleodolind is sent out from the city as a prey for the dragon,

some youthful St. George, in celestial armour, rides by in the nick of

time, on his snow-white steed, and draws his trusty blade, and fights

for her, and rescues her from the loathly thing. Else what were the use

of faith and of poetry? In every age we fashion the story anew in our

passing manner, dressing it up in our own clothes, and fitting it to our

particular modes and morals. But ’tis the same to the end through all

disguises. The Greeks told it as the tale of Perseus and Andromeda; they

made their hero purely Greek, a triumphant young son of immortal Zeus,

who rescues a beautiful princess, with fair nude limbs like Parian

marble, from the devouring sea-monster. Mediæval Italy made the sign of

the cross, turned the son of Danaë into a Christian martyr, and clad the

beautiful nude maiden in clinging silk robes, as it would fain have clad

Melian Aphrodite herself when it converted her image into a crowned

Madonna. The Renaissance came, and Cellini unclothed her again, in his

revived paganism, to set her polished bronze limbs, where every eye

might see and stare, in the Piazza at Florence. Our modern novelists

dress her up afresh in the princess robe of the day (sage green or

crushed strawberry), and turn her loose on that slimy old dragon the

world, till Prince Charming comes by, as a baronet in a tennis suit, to

lay at her feet ten thousand a year and the title of My Lady. But ’tis

the old tale still, and who lists to tell it may trick it out once more

in his own heart’s fashion. For though there be nothing new under the

sun, the old wonder is there, as marvellous as ever, if you choose to

marvel at it. Each spring brings it back, a perpetual miracle.

So I set forth into the world, a Princess Cleodolind of the nineteenth

century, ready to face the dragons that, as I well know, abound in it,

and full of faith in the St. George who will come to rescue me. I mean

to sail away on my Odyssey, unabashed, touching at such shores as may

chance to beckon, yet hopeful of reaching at last the realms of

Alcinous.

From all which you may guess that I am a Girton girl.

The type-writer girl · 第 1 / 22 章