CHAPTER IX.

THE LAST MARTYRS OF HENRY'S REIGN.

(1545.)

Henry VIII., sick and fretful, was easily drawn first to one side, then

to the other. He was a victim of indecision, of violent excitement and

of irresolution. His brother-in-law, the duke of Suffolk, who of all

the members of the Privy Council was the most determined supporter

of the Reformation, had died in August, 1545, and that body was

thenceforward impelled in an opposite direction, and carried the king

along with it.

[Sidenote: RECANTATION OF SHAXTON.]

Shaxton, having resigned his see of Salisbury after the publication

of the Six Articles, had been put in prison, and had long rejected

all proposals of recantation addressed to him. Having aggravated his

offence while in prison by asserting that the natural body of Christ

was not in the sacrament, he was condemned to be burnt. The bishops of

London and Worcester, sent by the king, visited him in the prison and

strove to convince him. This feeble and egotistic man readily professed

himself persuaded, and thanked the king 'for that he had delivered him

at the same time from the temporal and from the everlasting fire.' On

July 13, 1546, he was set at liberty. As he grew old his understanding

became still weaker; and in Mary's reign the unhappy man was one of the

most eager to burn those whom he had called his brethren.[433]

While there were men like Shaxton, whose fall was decisive and final,

others were to be met with who, although in their own hearts decided

for the truth, were alarmed when they found themselves in danger of

death, and subscribed the Catholic declarations which were offered to

them. But after having thus plunged into the abyss, they lifted up

their heads as soon as possible and again confessed the truth. One

of this class was Edward Crome, who, at this period, gave way on two

occasions, but recovered himself.[434]

Many other blemishes were visible in the general state of the Anglican

church; and the obstinacy of the king, in particular, in maintaining

in his kingdom, side by side, two things in opposition to each other,

the Catholic doctrines and the reading of the Bible, subjected the

sacred volume to strange honors. The king in person prorogued the

parliament on December 24, and on this occasion made his last speech

to the highest body in the state. He spoke as vicar of God, and gave

a lecture to the ministers and the members of the church. It was his

taste; he believed that he was born for this position, and there was in

his nature as much of the preceptor as of the king. Moreover, there was

nothing which offended him so much as the attempt to address a lecture

to himself. Any one who did so risked his own life. But while he was

easily hurt, he did not shrink from hurting the feelings of others. He

handled the rod more easily than the sceptre.

[Sidenote: SPEECH OF HENRY VIII.]

The Speaker of the House of Commons having delivered an address

to the king in which he extolled his virtues, Henry replied as

follows:--'Whereas you ... have both praised and extolled me for the

notable qualities you have conceived to be in me, I most heartily thank

you all that you put me in remembrance of my duty, which is to endeavor

myself to obtain and get such excellent qualities and necessary

virtues.... No prince in the world more favoreth his subjects than I

do you, nor any subjects or commons more love and obey their sovereign

lord than I perceive you do me. Yet, although I with you, and you with

me, be in this perfect love and concord, this friendly amity can not

continue except you, my lords temporal, and you, my lords spiritual,

and you, my loving subjects, study and take pains to amend any thing,

which is surely amiss and far out of order, ... which is, that charity

and concord is not among you; but discord and dissension beareth rule

in every place. St. Paul saith to the Corinthians, in the thirteenth

chapter, "Charity is gentle, charity is not envious, charity is not

proud," and so forth. Behold then what love and charity is amongst

you when one calleth the other heretic and anabaptist; and he calleth

him again papist, hypocrite, and pharisee. Be these things tokens of

charity amongst you? Are these the signs of fraternal love between you?

No, no, I assure you that this lack of charity amongst yourselves will

be the hindrance and assuaging of the fervent love between us, except

this wound be salved and clearly made whole. I must needs judge the

fault and occasion of this discord to be partly by the negligence of

you, the fathers and preachers of the spiritualty.... I see and hear

daily that you of the clergy preach one against another, ... and few or

none do preach truly and sincerely the Word of God.... Alas! how can

the poor souls live in concord when you preachers sow amongst them, in

your sermons, debate and discord? Of you they look for light, and you

bring them to darkness. Amend these crimes, I exhort you, and set forth

God's word, both by true preaching and good example-giving; or else

I, whom God hath appointed his vicar and high minister here, will see

these divisions extinct.... Although (as I say) the spiritual men be

in some fault ... yet you of the temporalty be not clean and unspotted

of malice and envy; for you rail on bishops, speak slanderously of

priests, and rebuke and taunt preachers.... Although you be permitted

to read Holy Scripture, and to have the Word of God in your mother

tongue, you must understand that it is licensed you so to do, only to

inform your own conscience, and to instruct your children and family;

not to dispute and make Scripture a railing and a taunting stock

against priests and preachers, as many light persons do. I am very

sorry to know and hear how unreverently that most precious jewel, the

Word of God, is disputed, rhymed, sung, and jangled in every alehouse

and tavern, contrary to the true meaning and doctrine of the same....

Be in charity one with another, ... to the which I, as your supreme

head and sovereign lord, exhort and require you; and then I doubt not

but that love and league, which I spake of in the beginning, shall

never be dissolved or broken between us.'[435]

The school-master had not spoken amiss. The parliament did not make

the retort, 'Physician, heal thyself,' though it might have been

applicable. One of the measures by which the king manifested his 'sweet

charity' proves that, if he were not, like some old school-masters, a

tyrant of words and syllables, he tyrannized over the peace and the

lives of his people.

[Sidenote: ANNE ASKEW.]

There were at the court a certain number of ladies of the highest rank

who loved the Gospel--the duchess of Suffolk, the countess of Sussex,

the countess of Hertford, Lady Denny, Lady Fitzwilliam,[436] and

above all the queen. Associated with these was a pious, lively, and

beautiful young lady, of great intelligence and amiable disposition,

and whose fine qualities had been improved by education. Her name

was Anne Askew. She was the second daughter of Sir William Askew,

member of a very ancient Lincolnshire family. She had two brothers

and two sisters. Her brother Edward was one of the king's bodyguards.

The queen frequently received Anne and other Christian women in her

private apartments; and there prayer was made and the Word of God

expounded by an evangelical minister. The king, indeed, was aware of

these secret meetings, but he feigned ignorance. Anne was at this

time in great need of the consolations of the Gospel. Her father, Sir

William, had a rich neighbor named Kyme, with whom he was intimate;

and being anxious that his eldest daughter should marry a rich man, he

arranged with Kyme that she should wed his eldest son. The young lady

died before the nuptials took place; and Sir William, reluctant to let

slip so good a chance, compelled his second daughter Anne to marry

the betrothed of her sister, and by him she became the mother of two

children. The third sister, Joan, was married to Sir John Saint-Paul.

The Holy Scriptures in the English version attracted Anne's attention,

and ere long she became so attached to them that she meditated on

them day and night. Led by them to a living faith in Jesus Christ,

she renounced Romish superstitions. The priests, who were greatly

annoyed, stirred up against her her young husband, a rough man and

a staunch papist, who 'violently drove her out of his house.'[437]

Anne said, 'Since, according to the Scripture, "if the unbelieving

depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in

such cases,"[438]--I claim my divorce.' She went to London to take

the necessary proceedings; and either through her brother, one of the

guards, or otherwise, made the acquaintance of the pious ladies of the

court and of the queen herself.

It was a great vexation to the enemies of the Reformation to see

persons of the highest rank almost openly professing the evangelical

faith. As they did not dare to attack them, they determined to make

a beginning with Anne Askew, and thereby to terrify the rest. She

had said one day, 'I would sooner read five lines in the Bible than

hear five masses in the church.' On another occasion she had denied

the corporal presence of the Saviour in the sacrament. She was sent

to prison. When she was taken to Sadlers Hall, the judge, Dare, asked

her, 'Do you not believe that the sacrament hanging over the altar

was the very body of Christ really?' Anne replied, 'Wherefore was St.

Stephen stoned to death?' Dare, doubtless, remembered that Stephen had

said, 'I see the Son of man sitting _at the right hand of God_.' From

this it followed that He was not in the sacrament. He preferred to

answer, 'I can not tell.' It is possible, however, that his ignorance

was not feigned. 'No more,' said Anne, 'will I assoil your vain

question.' Anne was afterwards taken before the lord-mayor, Sir Martin

Bowes, a passionate bigot. He was under-treasurer of the Mint, and

in 1550 obtained the king's pardon for all the false money which he

had coined. The magistrate gravely asked her whether a mouse, eating

the host, received God or no? 'I made no answer, but smiled,' says

Anne. The bishop's chancellor, who was present, sharply said to her,

'St. Paul forbade women to speak or to talk of the Word of God.' 'How

many women,' said she in reply, 'have you seen go into the pulpit and

preach?' 'Never any,' he said. 'You ought not to find fault in poor

women, except they have offended the law.' She was unlawfully committed

to prison, and for eleven days no one was allowed to see her. At this

time she was about twenty-five years of age.

One of her cousins, named Brittayne, was admitted to see her. He

immediately did every thing he could to get Anne released on bail.

The lord-mayor bade him apply to the chancellor of the bishop of

London. The chancellor replied to him, 'Apply to the bishop.' The

bishop said, 'I will give order for her to appear before me to-morrow

at three o'clock in the afternoon.' He then subjected her to a long

examination. He asked her, amongst other things, 'Do you not think that

private masses help the souls departed?' 'It is great idolatry,' she

replied, 'to believe more in them than in the death which Christ died

for us.' 'What kind of answer is this?' said the bishop of London. 'It

is a weak one,' replied Anne, 'but good enough for such a question.'

After the examination, at which Anne made clear and brief replies,

Bonner wrote down a certain number of articles of faith, and required

that Anne should set her hand to them. She wrote, 'I believe so much

thereof as the Holy Scripture doth agree unto.' This was not what

Bonner wanted. The bishop pressed the point, and said, 'Sign this

document.' Anne then wrote, 'I, Anne Askew, do believe all manner of

things contained in the faith of the Catholic Church.' The bishop, well

knowing what Anne meant by this word, hurried away into an adjoining

room in a great rage.[439] Her cousin Brittayne followed him and

implored him to treat his kinswoman kindly. 'She is a woman,' exclaimed

the bishop, 'and I am nothing deceived in her.' 'Take her as a woman,'

said Brittayne, 'and do not set her weak woman's wit to your lordship's

great wisdom.' At length, Anne's two sureties, to wit, Brittayne and

Master Spilman of Grays Inn, were on the following day accepted, and

she was set at liberty. These events took place in the year 1545.

[Sidenote: SECOND ARREST OF ANNE ASKEW.]

Anne having continued to profess the Gospel, and to have meetings

with her friends, she was again arrested three months later, and was

brought before the privy council at Greenwich. On the opening of the

examination she refused to go into the matter before the council, and

said, 'If it be the king's pleasure to hear me, I will show him the

truth.' 'It is not meet,' they replied, 'for the king to be troubled

with you.' She answered, 'Solomon was reckoned the wisest king that

ever lived, yet misliked he not to hear two poor common women; much

more his grace a single woman and his faithful subject.' 'Tell me your

opinion on the sacrament,' said the lord chancellor. 'I believe,' she

said, 'that so oft as I, in a Christian congregation, do receive the

bread in remembrance of Christ's death, and with thanksgiving ... I

receive therewith the fruits also of his most glorious passion.' 'Make

a direct answer to the question,' said Gardiner. 'I will not sing a

new song of the Lord,' she said, 'in a strange land.' 'You speak in

parables,' said Gardiner. 'It is best for you,' she answered; 'for if I

show the open truth, ye will not accept it.' 'You are a parrot,' said

the incensed bishop. She replied, 'I am ready to suffer all things at

your hands, not only your rebukes, but all that shall follow besides,

yea, and all that gladly.'

The next day Anne once more appeared before the council. They began

the examination on the subject of transubstantiation. Seeing Lord

Parr, uncle to the queen, and Lord Lisle, she said to them, 'It is a

great shame for you to counsel contrary to your knowledge.' 'We would

gladly,' they answered, 'all things were well.' Gardiner wished to

speak privately with her, but this she refused. The lord chancellor

then began to examine her again. 'How long,' said Anne, 'will you halt

on both sides?' 'You shall be burnt,' said the bishop of London. She

replied, 'I have searched all the Scriptures, yet could I never find

that either Christ or his apostles put any creature to death.'

Anne was sent back to prison. She was very ill, and believed herself

to be near death. Never had she had to endure such attacks. She

requested leave to see Latimer, who was still confined in the Tower;

but this consolation was not allowed her. Resting firmly, as she

did, on Scriptural grounds, she did not suffer herself to swerve.

To her constitutional resolution she added that which was the fruit

of communion with God; and she was thus placed by faith above the

attacks which she experienced. Having a good foundation, she resolutely

defended the freedom of her conscience and her full trust in Christ;

and not only did she encounter her enemies without wavering, but

she spoke to them with a power sufficient to awe them, and gave

home-thrusts which threw them into confusion. Nevertheless she was

only a weak woman, and her bodily strength began to fail. In Newgate

she said,--'The Lord strengthen us in the truth. Pray, pray, pray.'

She composed while in prison some stanzas which have been pronounced

extraordinary, not only for simple beauty and sublime sentiment, but

also for the noble structure and music of the verse.[440]

By law, Anne had a right to be tried by jury; but on June 28, 1546,

she was condemned by the lord chancellor and the council, without

further process, to be burnt, for having denied the corporal presence

of Christ. They asked her whether she wished for a priest; she smiled

and said she would confess her faults unto God, for she was sure that

He would hear her with favor. She added: 'I think his grace shall well

perceive me to be weighed in an uneven pair of balances.... Here I take

heaven and earth to record that I shall die in mine innocency.'[441]

[Sidenote: ROYAL PROCLAMATION.]

It was proved that Anne had derived her faith from the Holy Scriptures.

Gardiner and his partisans therefore prevailed upon the government,

eight days before the death of this young Christian, to issue a

proclamation purporting 'that from henceforth no man, woman or person

of what estate, condition or degree soever he or they be [consequently

including the ladies and gentlemen of the court as well as others],

shall, after the last day of August next ensuing receive, have, take or

keep in their possession the text of the New Testament, of Tyndale's or

Coverdale's translation in English, nor any other than is permitted by

the Act of Parliament; ... nor after the said day shall receive, have,

take or keep in his or their possession any manner of books printed

or written in the English tongue which be or shall be set forth in

the names of Fryth, Tyndale, Wycliffe, ... Barnes, Coverdale, ... or

by any of them; ... and it was required that all such books should be

delivered to the mayor, bailiff or chief constable of the town to be

openly burned.[442]

This was a remarkable proceeding on the part of Henry VIII. But events

were stronger than the proclamation, and it remained a dead letter.

[Sidenote: TORTURE OF ANNE ASKEW.]

Anne's sentence was pronounced before the issue of the proclamation.

The trial was over, and there was to be no further inquiry. But her

death was not enough to satisfy Rich, Wriothesley and their friends.

They had other designs, and were about to perpetrate the most shameful

and cruel acts. The object which these men now proposed to themselves

was to obtain such evidence as would warrant them in taking proceedings

against those ladies of the court who were friends of the Gospel.

They went (July 13) to the Tower, where Anne was still confined, and

questioned her about her accomplices, naming the duchess-dowager of

Suffolk, the countess of Sussex and several others. Anne answered, 'If

I should pronounce any thing against them, I should not be able to

prove it.' They next asked her whether there were no members of the

royal council who gave her their support. She said, none. The king is

informed, they replied, that if you choose you can name a great many

persons who are members of your sect. She answered that 'the king was

as well deceived in that behalf as dissembled with in other matters.'

The only effect of these denials was to irritate Wriothesley and his

colleague; and, determined at any cost to obtain information against

influential persons at the court, they ordered the rack to be applied

to the young woman. This torture lasted a long time; but Anne gave

no hint, nor even uttered a cry. The lord chancellor, more and more

provoked, said to Sir Antony Knevet, lieutenant of the Tower, 'Strain

her on the rack again.' The latter refused to do this. It was to no

purpose that Wriothesley threatened him if he would not obey.

Rich, a member of the privy council, had frequently given proof of

his baseness. Wriothesley was ambitious, inflated with self-conceit,

haughty, and easily angered if his advice was not taken. These two men

now forgot themselves; and the spectacle was presented of the lord

chancellor of England and a privy councillor of the king turned into

executioners. They set their own hands to the horrible instrument, and

so severely applied the torture to the innocent young woman, that she

was almost broken upon it and quite dislocated. She fainted away and

was well-nigh dead.[443] 'Then the lieutenant caused me to be loosed;

incontinently I swooned, and then they recovered me again. After that

I sat two long hours, reasoning with my Lord Chancellor on the bare

floor, where he, with many flattering words, persuaded me to leave

my opinion.'[444] Henry VIII. himself censured Wriothesley for his

cruelty, and excused the lieutenant of the Tower. 'Then was I brought

to a house,' says Anne, 'laid in a bed, with as weary and painful

bones as ever Job had.' The chancellor sent word to her that if she

renounced her faith she should be pardoned and should want for nothing,

but that otherwise she should be burnt. She answered, 'I will sooner

die.' At the same time she fell on her knees in the dungeon and said:

'O Lord, I have more enemies now than there be hairs on my head; yet,

Lord, let them never overcome me with vain words, but fight thou, Lord,

in my stead, for on thee I cast my care. With all the spite they can

imagine, they fall upon me, who am thy poor creature. Yet, sweet Lord,

let me not set by them that are against me; for in thee is my whole

delight. And, Lord, I heartily desire of thee, that thou wilt of thy

most merciful goodness forgive them that violence which they do, and

have done, unto me. Open also thou their blind hearts, that they may

hereafter do that thing in thy sight, which is only acceptable before

thee, and to set forth thy verity aright, without all vain fantasies of

sinful men. So be it, O Lord, so be it.'[445]

The 16th of July, the day fixed for the last scene of this tragedy, had

arrived; every thing was ready for the burning of Anne at Smithfield.

The execution was to take place not in the morning, the usual time,

but at nightfall, to make it the more terrible. It was thus, in every

sense, a deed of darkness. They were obliged to carry Anne to the

place of execution, for in her state at that time she was unable to

walk. When she reached the pile, she was bound to the post by her

waist, with a chain which prevented her from sinking down. The wretched

Shaxton, nominated for the purpose, then completed his apostasy by

delivering a sermon on the sacrament of the altar, a sermon abounding

in errors. Anne, who was in full possession of her faculties, contented

herself with saying, 'He misseth and speaketh without the Book.' Three

other evangelical Christians were to die at the same time with her:

Belenian, a priest; J. Lacels (Lascelles), of the king's household,

probably the man who had revealed the incontinence of Catherine

Howard, a deed for which the Roman party hated him; and one Adams,

a Colchester man. 'Now, with quietness,' said Lacels, 'I commit the

whole world to their pastor and herdsman Jesus Christ, the only Saviour

and true Messias....' The letter from which we quote is subscribed,

'John Lacels, late servant to the king, and now I trust to serve the

everlasting King, with the testimony of my blood in Smithfield.'[446]

[Sidenote: MARTYRDOM.]

There was an immense gathering of the people. On a platform erected

in front of St. Bartholomew's church were seated, as presidents at

the execution, Wriothesley, lord chancellor of England, the old

duke of Norfolk, the old earl of Bedford, the lord-mayor Bowes, and

various other notabilities. When the fire was going to be lighted, the

chancellor sent a messenger to Anne Askew, instructed to offer her the

king's pardon if she would recant. She answered, 'I am not come hither

to deny my Lord and Master.' The same pardon was offered to the other

martyrs, but they refused to accept it and turned away their heads.

Then stood up the ignorant and fanatical Bowes, and exclaimed with a

loud voice, '_Fiat justitia!_' Anne was soon wrapt in the flames; and

this noble victim who freely offered herself a sacrifice to God, gave

up her soul in peace. Her companions did likewise.[447]

These four persons were the last victims of the reign of Henry VIII.

The enemies of the Reformation were especially annoyed at this time

to see women of the first families of England embrace the faith which

they hated. On a woman of most superior mind, but young and weak,

fell the last blow levelled against the Gospel by _the defender of

the faith_. Anne Askew fell; but the great doctrines which she had so

courageously professed were soon to be triumphant in the midst of her

fellow-countrymen.

History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin, Vol. 8 (of 8) · 第 9 / 15 章