MDCCL.

To the Reader.

_The substance of the philosophical part of this discourse was

delivered at twice to the Royal Society, on_ March 15, _and_ 22: _The

theological, in my own church. I could not refuse the solicitation of my

friends, hearers in both places, to print it. I wish my intention, in

the compliance, may any ways prove successful; to show, how vain, and

unmeaning, are all our philosophical inquiries, when destitute of their

true view; to lead us into the more engaging paths of religion. That,

from speculation of material causes, we may become adepts in that wisdom

which is from above. Otherwise, like_ Epicurus, _and the ancient heathen

philosophers, we barter away our immortal part, for a curiosity, that

amuses us to no good purpose. Mean are these objects of our senses to be

accounted, in comparison of our spiritual natures, to which our principal

regard is due! For we must rightly say with_ Job: Lo, these are parts of

God's ways, but how little a portion is heard of him? and the thunder of

his power, who can understand?

[Illustration]

The Philosophy of Earthquakes, Natural and Religious or, An Inquiry Into Their Cause, and Their Purpose · 第 6 / 22 题