As the cost of the theater mounts up—the price of seats, the price of

achieving Broadway productions—the Fireside Theater audience is steadily

recruited. If there has existed a prejudice against reading plays, it

is melting. The mere force of conditions would tend to destroy such a

prejudice. The path to Broadway becomes steadily more difficult and the

path away from Broadway narrower—all because it costs too much to produce

a play on Broadway, and far too much to take the play, once so produced,

on the road. Soon the Broadway theater will survive as the horse

survives; and Broadway productions, inspired by the same motives as the

production of horse races, will be nobly upheld by the same justificatory

excuse—it will be argued that they improve the breed of plays.

It does no harm to have a few horse shows or to have a few Broadway

productions; but the truth must be stated that the theater in America

no longer depends upon the amusement business in the vicinity of

Forty-second Street. To an extent never before equaled, plays are now

published in America regardless of their production; are bought and read;

are read aloud for an exceptional evening’s entertainment; and are acted

under license, and with payment of very moderate fees, by people to whom

a play is a play and not a pair of high-priced tickets.

For amateur actors, many of them amazingly capable, there are now

available plays of every length and of every conceivable variety of type,

settings, and casts; of extreme, moderate and very slight demands upon

the actors’ skill; tragic, comedic, farcical. And for readers of plays

there are certain immutable advantages that have been pointed out before

but will bear stressing again, such as that the performance always begins

on time, and at _your_ chosen time, and that the actors, being your own

creatures, are always ideal.

I shall try to speak first of some anthologies of plays, then of plays by

individual authors, and finally of a few books about the drama and the

theater.

ii

First I would put Montrose J. Moses’s ample works. His _Representative

British Dramas: Victorian and Modern_ is not only a complete history of

the British stage, from the beginning of the nineteenth century to 1914;

it presents the complete texts of twenty-one English and Irish plays

superbly representative of its century. _Representative Continental

Dramas: Revolutionary and Transitional_ does much the same thing for

Europe as a whole. Eight European countries are represented in this

anthology, which contains the complete texts of fifteen plays, with a

general survey of the development of Continental drama and individual

bibliographies. But the greatest demand is for anthologies of one-act

plays; a demand richly met by the following standard works:

_Representative One-Act Plays by American Authors_, compiled by Margaret

G. Mayorga, contains the complete texts of twenty-four, all of which have

been produced in Little Theaters. Among the dramatists included are

Percy Mackaye, Stuart Walker, Jeannette Marks, George Middleton, Susan

Glaspell, Eugene O’Neill, and Beulah Marie Dix.

_Fifty Contemporary One-Act Plays_ edited by Frank Shay and Pierre

Loving, is an international selection of astonishing variety and

exceptional merit.

_Twenty Contemporary One-Act Plays—American_, edited by Frank Shay, is an

anthology which affords variety of choice for acting and ample variety

for the reader.

Barrett H. Clark’s _Representative One-Act Plays by British and Irish

Authors_ contains complete texts of twenty one-act plays. Some of the

authors are Pinero, Jones, Arnold Bennett, Yeats, Oscar Wilde, Granville

Barker and Lord Dunsany. Mr. Moses is the compiler of _Representative

One-Act Plays by Continental Authors_. Maeterlinck, Arthur Schnitzler,

Strindberg, Andreyev, Franz Wedekind, Sudermann, von Hofmannsthal,

Lavedan are some of the playwrights whose work is included; and the book

is equipped with bibliographies.

Frank Shay is the compiler of _Twenty-Five Short Plays: International_,

in which is much exotic work—plays from Bengal and Burma, China and

Japan and Uruguay, as well as from countries with whose drama we have

more contact. But as an example of Mr. Shay’s selections we may note,

from among the writers whose work is fairly familiar, that Austria is

represented by a Schnitzler piece, Italy by one of Robert Bracco’s

comedies, Hungary by Lajos Biro’s “The Bridegroom,” Russia by an example

of Chekhov and Spain by Echegaray.

I may at this point advantageously call attention to Mr. Shay’s _One

Thousand and One Plays for the Little Theatre_, and his new _One Thousand

and One Longer Plays_—not anthologies, but exhaustive lists. The plays

are listed alphabetically by authors and by organizations, and the title,

nature of the work, number of men and women characters, publisher, and

price of each play is given.

Certain other books, though offering a number of one-act plays, have too

few inclusions to be described as anthologies. Such are _One-Act Plays

from the Yiddish_, translated by Etta Block and presenting half a dozen

effective pieces; _Three Modern Japanese Plays_, translated by Yozan

T. Iwasaki and Glenn Hughes, and showing the direct result of Western

influences on the Japanese theatre; and _Double Demon and Other One-Act

Plays_, by A. P. Herbert and others, one of the British Drama League

series.

Colin Campbell Clements, whose _Plays for a Folding Theatre_ is known

to most amateurs, has a new book this season called _Plays for Pagans_,

containing five entertaining short plays, all easy of stage production.

Another such group is to be found in _Garden Varieties_, by Kenyon

Nicholson, six plays, most of them farcical and amusing.

Certain other one-act plays I shall speak of later in this chapter. But

the record of excellent anthologies is not yet completed. _A Treasury

of Plays for Children_, by Mr. Moses, provides fourteen dramas with the

abundance of incident and action which young people demand but with

considerable literary merit besides. Mr. Shay, again, is the compiler of

_A Treasury of Plays for Women_, eighteen in all, requiring only women to

cast or containing only such male characters as may easily be enacted by

women; and also of _A Treasury of Plays for Men_, twenty-one altogether,

which men may stage without feminine help. _A Treasury of Plays for

Men_ also offers a working library list for the Little Theater and a

bibliography of other anthologies.

ii

In coming to the work of individual playwrights, I am afraid the method

of conscientious enumeration must to a great extent go on. Granville

Barker’s work is almost too well-known to require special comment.

His plays, some one of which is almost certain to be found in any

comprehensive anthology, are published in seven volumes, each a single

drama except the _Three Short Plays_. Anatol, to be sure, is simply Mr.

Barker’s splendid version of Arthur Schnitzler’s gay satire on a gilded

youth of Vienna. Probably _Waste_, at once intimate in its discussions

and intensely serious, is the best-known drama by Barker; but _The

Madras House_, with its humors of feminine psychology, and _The Voysey

Inheritance_, that fine study of middle-class English family life, are

both popular. The others are _The Marrying of Ann Leete_, at once a

comedy and a satire, and the three-act play called _The Secret Life_, a

play of present-day England touched with philosophy and mysticism and

occasional cynicism, but of the same distinctive quality as Barker’s

other work.

Three plays by Lewis Beach have been published. _A Square Peg_ presents

the tragic results of a mother’s unflinching rule of her family. _The

Goose Hangs High_ is a comedy of family loyalty and affection which

brings the younger generation face to face with its elders; it has been

a success of the last New York season. But the one to which I want to

direct attention especially is _Ann Vroome_, a play in seven scenes

giving the story of a girl’s long wait for happiness when she postpones

marriage to care for her parents. This play has a very fine acceleration

of dramatic interest, of emotional intensity; and its literary quality

is of a high order. It is evident that Mr. Beach does nothing badly.

The history of Owen Davis has been told many times, but I do not suppose

its impression of the extraordinary is ever lessened. He wrote, for

years, melodramas of the “Nellie, the Beautiful Cloak Model” order; I am

by no means sure he did not write “Nellie.” In those days he supplied

the theaters of the Bowery and other avenues no better as to art if less

notorious. It should be said that however cheap were these works, they

were infinitely more respectable and of a better moral character than

some pretentious affairs playing uptown. Mr. Davis had two reasonable

purposes—to learn play writing and to make necessary money. When he

had accomplished both, being still a young man, he turned to work of a

different description. His play, _The Detour_ (1921), the story of a

woman’s never-dying aspiration and hope, was one of the finest things

of its season. Clear-cut, dramatic, with comedy and pathos interwoven,

it depicted mental and spiritual force pitted against solely material

ambition in a way that those who saw or read it did not forget. The

evidence was clear that a new American dramatist of the first rank had

been born. _Icebound_ (1922), had immediate attention and very marked

critical praise, crowned by the award to it of the Pulitzer Prize by

Columbia University as the best American play of the year.

The most successful American playwright of his day, Clyde Fitch was also

one of the ablest. The Memorial Edition of the _Plays of Clyde Fitch_,

edited, with introductions, by Montrose J. Moses and Virginia Gerson, and

published in four volumes is a gallant and important affair. The edition

is definitive and contains three plays that were never before in print,

“The Woman in the Case,” “Lovers’ Lane,” and that most important of the

Fitch plays, “The City.” The fourth volume of this edition contains Mr.

Fitch’s address on “The Play and the Public.”[78]

The four volumes of _Representative Plays by Henry Arthur Jones_, edited,

with historical, biographical, and critical introductions, by Clayton

Hamilton, assemble in a splendid library edition the most interesting

work of the British dramatist. Henry Arthur Jones wrote some sixty or

seventy plays, printed mainly in pamphlet form—“scrips”—for the use,

primarily, of actors, professional and amateur. These Mr. Hamilton

sifted, at the same time making an effort to indicate the range and

variety of Jones’s work. As a consequence, _Representative Plays_ opens

with a celebrated old-time melodrama, “The Silver King,” and illustrates

the stages in the author’s progress until he arrived, in the composition

of “The Liars,” at a really great accomplishment as a master of modern

English comedy. Mr. Hamilton’s introductions carry the reader’s attention

from play to play along a continuous current of historical, biographical

and critical comment. Probably the best-known inclusions are the plays in

the third volume: “Michael and His Lost Angel,” “The Liars,” “Mrs. Dane’s

Defence,” and “The Hypocrites.”

Of Cosmo Hamilton’s _Four Plays_ I have already made mention[79] and

perhaps I should have spoken of Percival Wilde when dealing with

one-act plays. Mr. Wilde’s work is itself an anthology of the one-act

play. This New Yorker was for a while in the banking business; on the

publication of his first story he received so many requests to allow its

dramatization that he thought he would investigate the drama himself.

That was not more than a dozen years ago; yet now Percival Wilde is

commonly said to have had more plays produced—or rather, to have had a

greater number of productions—in American Little Theaters than any other

playwright.

His books to date (of this sort) are five. _Eight Comedies for Little

Theatres_ contains “The Previous Engagement,” “The Dyspeptic Ogre,”

“Catesby,” “The Sequel,” “In the Net,” “His Return,” “The Embryo,” and “A

Wonderful Woman.” Then there are his other collections—_Dawn, and Other

One-Act Plays of Life Today_ (six), _A Question of Morality, and Other

Plays_ (five), and _The Unseen Host, and Other War Plays_ (five), and

_The Inn of Discontent and Other Fantastic Plays_ (five).

George Kelly, a young American born in a suburb of Philadelphia, had

the daring to satirize the Little Theater movement in America in “The

Torch-Bearers,” which had a New York success. In this past season his

play, _The Show-Off_, has not only been a memorable success but has

perhaps had more unqualified praise than any drama in years. “I might as

well begin boldly and say that _The Show-Off_ is the best comedy which

has yet been written by an American,” writes Heywood Broun in his preface

to the published play; and this does not much exaggerate the note of the

general chorus. The committee named to recommend a play for the award of

the annual Pulitzer Prize selected _The Show-Off_; and the overruling

of their choice by the Columbia University authorities was the subject

of considerable controversy not entirely free from indignant feeling.

What is this play? “A transcript of life, in three acts,” the titlepage

truthfully calls it. The chief character, Aubrey Piper, liar, braggart,

egoist, is almost dreadfully real. It is perhaps possible, however

depressing, to regard him as a symbol of all mankind, bringing us to

realize the toughness of human fiber, as Mr. Broun suggests. But it seems

to me much more likely that the play’s great merit and supreme interest

lies in another point that Mr. Broun makes: there is no development

of character in Aubrey, but only in ourselves, the audience, who come

to know him progressively better, and finally to know him to the last

inescapable dreg. Most critics have tended, I think, to overlook the

splendid characterization of Mrs. Fisher, Aubrey’s perspicacious and

unrelenting mother-in-law. The play is too true for satire, too serious

for comedy, too humanly diverting for tears. It is certainly not to be

missed.

_The Lilies of the Field_, a comedy by John Hastings Turner, author of

several novels, including that very engaging story, _Simple Souls_, is

one of the British Drama League series and will probably have a New

York production this season. The desire of twin daughters of an English

village clergyman to become the wives of young men met in London—young

men who toil not, neither do they spin except at dances—produces the

complications, which are both entertaining and somewhat satirical. Of

the other British Drama League plays, _The Prince_, by Gwen John, deals

with Queen Elizabeth, and is “a study of character, based on contemporary

evidence,” while Laurence Binyon’s _Ayuli_ is drama in verse, telling

a picturesque story of Eastern Asia. Mr. Binyon has made studies of

Oriental art and his drama is of quite exceptional literary quality.

Of novel interest is _The Sea Woman’s Cloak and November Eve_, a volume

containing two plays by the American writer, Amelie Rives (Princess

Troubetzkoy), that are as Irish as work by Lady Gregory, Yeats, or J.

M. Synge. “The Sea Woman’s Cloak” is based on an old legend of Ganore’s

mating with a mortal; “November Eve” tells how Ilva, who is fairy-struck,

saves a soul the godly folk won’t risk their own souls to save.

_Dragon’s Glory_, a play in four scenes by Gertrude Knevels, is based on

an old Chinese legend, and makes very amusing reading and a most actable

comedy. Yow Chow has purchased the finest coffin in China (“Dragon’s

Glory”) and the action of the piece centers about this treasure, in which

the estimable Yow Chow reposes until a crisis which is the climax of the

play.

The two series known respectively as the Modern Series and the Little

Theatre Series consist of plays published in pamphlet form at a low

price for the convenience of amateur theatrical organizations. Included

in these series are separate plays by such authors as Booth Tarkington,

Christopher Morley, Edna St. Vincent Millay, Eugene O’Neill, Stuart

Walker, Floyd Dell, Rupert Brooke, and others, to a present total

of thirty titles. The Modern Series, edited by Frank Shay, has two

particularly striking new titles in _Lord Byron_ and _Autumn_.

_Lord Byron_, a play in seven scenes by Maurice Ferber, is of the genre

of Drinkwater’s _Abraham Lincoln_ and Mr. Eaton’s and Mr. Carb’s _Queen

Victoria_. Byron is one of the most dramatic of the possible subjects for

a biographical play, and Mr. Ferber’s work will undoubtedly be frequently

staged and very much read at this time of the Byron centenary.

_Autumn_, in four acts, by Ilya Surguchev, translated by David A.

Modell, is the picture of jealousy between a young wife and an adopted

daughter. “This is one of the strongest plays I have ever read,” says

Frank Shay. It is our first introduction to the work of the Russian

author and part of its novelty consists in the last act, which “achieves

a monotony that is real and genuine. It does not bring husband and wife

together in happiness, but shows that there is nothing else for them to

do but to go on.”

But the other new titles in the Modern Series deserve brief mention.

_Words and Thoughts_, by Don Marquis, presents John and Mary Speaker,

who utter the usual banalities of the world, and John and Mary Thinker,

who utter their true and less pleasant thoughts. John L. Balderston’s _A

Morality Play for the Leisure Class_ pictures a rich collector’s boredom

in heaven when he finds that his treasures there have no monetary value.

There is an O. Henry twist to the ending. Walter McClellan’s _The Delta

Wife_ is a genre play of the Mississippi River mouth, in type resembling

_Hell-Bent fer Heaven_. _The Lion’s Mouth_, by George Madden Martin and

Harriet L. Kennedy, deals with the relations of blacks and whites. A

white doctor ignores a black child in his efforts to save a white baby.

An old mammy has an invaluable herb cure; but finding that the doctor

cares nothing for her grandson’s life, she refuses to save the white

infant. Wilbur Daniel Steele’s _The Giant’s Stair_ is a study in mood

and atmosphere, like many of his short stories. Before the play opens a

man has been murdered. A terrific storm is raging. The scene is between

the widow and her demented sister and the sheriff. _Action!_ by Holland

Hudson is a swift-moving, melodramatic comedy. The son of a silk dealer

returns from selling airplanes to protest that the life of a silk

salesman is dull. His objections are interrupted by the entry of two

silk loft burglars and two bootleggers—followed by Federal officers and

policemen with drawn weapons.

The new titles in the Little Theatre Series, edited by Grace Adams,

include Edna St. Vincent Millay’s _Aria da Capo_ and her _The Lamp and

the Bell_.

Edna St. Vincent Millay’s work is known throughout America. _The Lamp and

the Bell_, a Shakespearean play written for a Vassar College anniversary,

has for its theme woman’s friendship, and is very nearly unique among

compositions for an occasion in having solid literary and dramatic merit.

Its fresh, vigorous, creative quality is enriched by some lovely lyrical

inclusions. _Aria da Capo_, Miss Millay’s bitterly ironic, beautiful and

interesting one-act fantasy, has been played, one is tempted to believe,

everywhere; and will for years be played again and again. No contemporary

Pierrot and Columbine composition excels it, if, indeed, any matches it.

Mary MacMillen’s _Pan or Pierrot_ is a play for children, to be acted out

of doors. And I must again call attention to John Farrar’s charming plays

for children in _The Magic Sea Shell_.

iii

Books about the theater are various, of course, ranging from æsthetic

studies down to the most practical handbook for amateurs. Of the latter,

I should certainly put first Barrett H. Clark’s _How to Produce Amateur

Plays_, now in a new and revised edition. This manual is as nearly

indispensable to amateur actors as anything can be. It tells how to

choose a play, how to organize, the principles of casting, and the

methods of rehearsing. It gives very necessary information about the

stage itself, lighting, scenery and costumes, and makeup. There is also a

list of good amateur plays and information about copyright and royalty.

Another book that will be particularly welcomed by schools and social

organizations is Claude Merton Wise’s _Dramatics for School and

Community_, which covers much the same fields as Mr. Clark’s work.

I have already spoken of Percival Wilde’s astonishing success as an

author of one-act plays; it makes his book on _The Craftsmanship of the

One-Act Play_ the last word on the subject. But the special value of

Mr. Wilde’s book is that it considers everything having to do with the

construction of the one-act play from the point of view of the stage

director as well as that of the author.

Granville Barker’s _The Exemplary Theatre_, though by one of the

best-known men of the group interested in and influencing modern dramatic

theory and esthetics, is preëminently a practical book. It considers the

theater as a civic institution and has a valuable chapter on the inner

and outer organization of a repertory theater; but the chapters on a

director’s duties, choosing the best plays, training the company, scenery

and lighting, and audiences are of widespread applicability.

A mention of books about the theater is fated to omit many excellent

volumes, but can scarcely fail to include a series of books which give

a complete circumspection of contemporary drama. The most recent volume

in the series is _The Contemporary Drama of Russia_, by Leo Wiener,

professor of Slavic languages and literature at Harvard. This entirely

new study is likely to create a commotion, for it belies utterly the

conclusions generally arrived at as to the relative value of the work

of such playwrights as Chekhov, Gorki, Andreyev, Solugub, Evreinov and

others, and it brings into prominence many names never heard of before

outside of Russia. Its picture of the origin and development of the

Moscow Art Theater is not the one of popular legend, and should probably

be narrowly compared with that given by Constantin Stanislavsky in his

_My Life in Art_[80] and with other accounts. Professor Wiener has

relied, however, upon letters, theatrical annals, and other contemporary

records. His bibliographies contain fairly full accounts of plays from

Ostrovski to the present, lists of books and articles on the contemporary

Russian drama, and lists of all English translations of plays.

_The Contemporary Drama of England_, by Thomas H. Dickinson, covers

adequately the history of the English stage since 1866. Ernest Boyd’s

_The Contemporary Drama of Ireland_ presents the Irish literary movement

and the work of Irish dramatists. _The Contemporary Drama of Italy_, by

Lander MacClintock, traces the development of the modern Italian theater

from its inception down to the present day, and has interesting chapters

on Gabriele d’Annunzio and the writers now popular in Italy. Frank W.

Chandler’s _The Contemporary Drama of France_, a longer work than the

three preceding, presents a survey and interpretation of French drama for

three decades, from the opening of the Theatre-Libre of Antoine to the

conclusion of the world war.

16. A Reasonable View of Michael Arlen

i

There is a book called _These Charming People_. In making this statement

I pause for an uncertain time. It is necessary to allow a little interval

for readers—quite as necessary as it is for the orator to give his

audience its innings. Readers do not create the same interruption for a

writer, and that is in itself a pity. That fact defeats much writing; for

the writer has rushed on before the reader’s mind has had a chance to

seethe a little and settle, passing on to a comparatively calm acceptance

of the next assertion.

But you can take anybody’s word for _These Charming People_—anybody’s,

that is, who has read it; and the number of persons who have read it

is very large and increases steadily. The truth is, this book and its

author have become fashionable; and when a book and an author have become

fashionable, some persons will go to any length. Now it is known that

Michael Arlen is the author of _These Charming People_, but who knows who

Michael Arlen may be? Is there a View of Michael Arlen? In the favorite

adjective of one of Mr. Arlen’s characters, is there a reasonable view of

the presumptively charming person?

Yes.

Cargoes for Crusoes · 第 16 / 28 段