II

That the groundwork of man’s character is laid in his childhood appears

as a trivial platitude. I am almost ashamed to bring it before you. And

yet, as I look round me and find how apt we are to forget this simple

precept which is so fundamental in our life, I cannot help calling your

attention to it. If we consider the matter, we can well understand the

reason why its full significance is not realized. We must remember that

all science begins with axioms which are apparently truisms. What is

more of a truism than the axioms of Geometry and Mechanics—that the

whole is greater than the part, that things which are equal to the same

thing are equal to one another, or that a body remains in the same state

unless an external force changes it? And yet the whole of Mathematics

and Mechanics is built on those simple axioms.

The elements of science are just such obvious platitudes. What is needed

is to use them as efficient tools and by their means draw the consequent

effects. The same holds true in the science of education. The axiom or

the law of early training is not new, it is well known, but it is

unfortunately too often neglected and forgotten, and its significance is

almost completely lost.

It is certainly surprising how this law of early training is so

disregarded, so totally ignored in the education of the child. Not only

do we neglect to lay the necessary solid basis in the early life of the

child, a solid basis ready for the future structure, we do not even take

care to clear the ground. In fact, we even make the child’s soul a

dunghill, full of vermin of superstitions, fears and prejudices,—a

hideous heap saturated with the spirit of credulity.

We regard the child’s mind as a _tabula rasa_, a vacant lot, and empty

on it all our rubbish and refuse. We labor under the delusion that

stories and fairy tales, myths and deceptions about life and man are

good for the child’s mind. Is it a wonder that on such a foundation men

can only put up shacks and shanties? We forget the simple fact that what

is harmful for the adult is still more harmful to the child. Surely what

is poisonous to the grown-up mind cannot be useful food to the young. If

credulity in old wives’ tales, lack of individuality, sheepish

submissiveness, barrack-discipline, unquestioned and uncritical belief

in authority, meaningless imitation of jingles and gibberish,

memorization of mother-goose wisdom, repetition of incomprehensible

prayers and articles of creed, unintelligent aping of good manners,

silly games, prejudices and superstitions and fears of the supernormal

and supernatural, are censured in adults, why should we approve their

cultivation in the young?

At home and at school we drill into the child’s mind uncritical beliefs

in stories and tales, fictions and figments, fables and myths, creeds

and dogmas which poison the very sources of the child’s mind. At home

and at school we give the child over as a prey to all sorts of fatal

germs of mental diseases and moral depravity. We leave the child’s mind

an open field to be sown with dragon’s teeth which bring forth a whole

crop of pernicious tendencies,—love and admiration of successful evil,

and adoration of the rule of brute force. From the dragon’s teeth sown

in early childhood there rises in later life a whole brood of

flint-hearted men who blindly jostle and fight and mercilessly tear one

another, to obtain for some greedy Jason, some witch of a Medea their

coveted golden fleece.

Philistine and genius · 第 6 / 22 题