CHAPTER III

FOUNDING OF THE CONGO FREE STATE

[Sidenote: The Great Nations Agree.]

On the 15th day of November, 1884, the International Conference,

convened by Prince Bismarck to regulate what that statesman termed

“the African question,” held its first meeting. It took place in

Berlin, Prince Bismarck presiding. In briefly outlining the object

of the Conference, the distinguished president exhibited in no small

degree that condensation and lucidity for which his utterances were

remarkable.

The Imperial Government [said Prince Bismarck] has been guided

by the conviction that all the Governments invited here share

the desire to associate the natives of Africa with civilisation,

by opening up the interior of that continent to commerce,

by furnishing the natives with the means of instruction, by

encouraging missions and enterprises so that useful knowledge

may be disseminated, and by paving the way to the suppression of

slavery, and especially of the slave trade among the blacks, the

gradual abolition of which was declared to be, as far back as the

Vienna Congress in 1814, the sacred duty of all the Powers. The

interest which all the civilised nations take in the material

development of Africa assures their co-operation in the task of

regulating the commercial relations with that part of the world.

The course followed for a number of years in the relations of

the Western Powers with the countries of Eastern Asia having up

to this moment given the best results by restraining commercial

rivalry within the limits of legitimate competition, the Government

of His Majesty the German Emperor has considered it possible to

recommend to the Powers to apply to Africa, in the form appropriate

to that continent, the same regimen, founded on the equality of the

rights and the solidarity of the interests of all the commercial

nations.

Proceeding, Prince Bismarck declared that the main object of the

Conference was the opening up to all the world of Central Africa.

He rejoiced that France was in perfect accord with Germany in this

matter. The first thing to be considered in this matter was, he

thought, how best to establish freedom of trade at the mouth and

in the basin of the Congo. On that subject the German Government

had formulated a plan, drawn as a declaration, designed to assure

freedom of trade in that region, with equal rights for all

nations,—monopolies and preferential duties for none.

Prince Bismarck was followed by the British representative, Sir

Edward Malet. No other Power in the world, said Sir Edward, had done

so much on behalf of the objects that the German Government affected

to have at heart as Great Britain; and he went on to point out that

the warm support of his country and Government might be relied upon

for proposals which had always formed part of their policy. He hoped

that the attention of the Conference would not be devoted entirely

to commerce, and that the welfare of native races would receive

attention. Freedom of trade should be restricted to legitimate

articles of trade, or the natives would lose more than they gained.

He apprehended that the chief difficulty of the Conference would

be, not to secure its unanimous adherence to general principles,

but to provide means for carrying those principles into effect. It

was certainly desirable to establish the validity of effective new

occupations on the coasts of Africa.

The Portuguese representative claimed for his country the honour of

having introduced the elements of civilisation into Africa, and saw

in an increase of commerce in that part of the world the assurance

of peace and respect for the rights of humanity. The American

representative contented himself by calling attention to the part his

country had taken in the opening of Central Africa, and referred with

pride to the achievements of Stanley, congratulating his countrymen

on being first to recognise the good work accomplished by that great

philanthropist, the King of the Belgians. The practical business,

however, of the sitting, was the question, “What territories

constitute the basin of the Congo and its affluents?” This being a

matter less easily disposed of, it was referred to a Commission of

eight experts selected by the eight Powers chiefly interested in its

solution.

The Commission of eight reported to the Conference at its third

sitting as follows:

The Basin of the Congo is delimited by the crests of the contiguous

basins, to wit, the basins in particular of the Niari, the Ogowe,

the Schari, and the Nile, on the north; by the Lake Tanganyika, on

the east; by the crests of the basins of the Zambesi and the Loge,

on the south. It comprises consequently all the territories drained

by the Congo and its affluents, including Lake Tanganyika and its

eastern tributaries.

This report seems as explicit as it well could be, and after

much discussion and some slight modifications it was adopted.

Baron Lambermont (Belgium) presented a report upon the best means

of safeguarding the welfare of the native races, treating with

remarkable ability of slavery, the importation of alcohol into the

Congo country, and other dangers that threaten uncivilised races

at their first contact with civilisation. Count Van der Straeten

Ponthoz (Belgium) spoke even more vigorously to the same effect,

and between them these two Belgian subjects of King Leopold showed

themselves more solicitous for the welfare of the Congo native than

the representative of any other nationality present.

The International Conference held its tenth and last sitting

on the 26th of February, 1885. As on the occasion of its first

sitting, Prince Bismarck presided. The drafting of the final act

of the Conference was ably performed by Baron Lambermont. The

representatives of the Powers assembled at Berlin signed conventions

with the International Association, acknowledging it as a friendly

and sovereign State whose flag—a golden five-pointed star on a blue

banner—they agreed henceforth to recognise.

[Illustration: View of the Port of Leopoldville (Stanley Pool).]

I am sure I am the interpreter [said the President in announcing

the existence of these treaties to the Conference] of the unanimous

sentiment of the Conference in saluting as a happy event the

communication made to us on the subject of the almost completely

unanimous recognition of the International Association of the

Congo. All of us here render justice to the lofty object of the

work to which His Majesty the King of the Belgians has attached his

name; we all know the efforts and the sacrifices by means of which

he has brought it to the point where it is to-day; we all entertain

the wish that the most complete success may crown an enterprise

that must so usefully promote the views which have directed the

Conference.

Thus the great Bismarck. Sir Edward Malet (Great Britain) said:

The part which Queen Victoria’s Government has taken in the

recognition of the flag of the Association as that of a friendly

Government warrants me in expressing the satisfaction with which we

regard the constitution of this new State, due to the initiative

of His Majesty the King of the Belgians. During long years the

King, dominated by a purely philanthropic idea, has spared

nothing, neither personal effort nor pecuniary sacrifice, which

could contribute to the realisation of his object. Yet the world

at large regarded these efforts with an eye of almost complete

indifference. Here and there his Majesty attracted some sympathy,

but it was somehow rather the sympathy of condolence than that

of encouragement. People said that the enterprise was beyond his

resources, that it was too great for him to achieve success. We

now see that the King was right, and that the idea he pursued was

not utopian. He has brought it to a happy conclusion, not without

difficulties, but the very difficulties have made the success all

the more striking. While rendering to his Majesty this homage by

recognising all the difficulties that he has surmounted, we salute

the new-born State with the greatest cordiality, and we express the

sincere desire to see it flourish and grow under his ægis.

Baron de Courcel (France) said: “The new State owes its origin

to the generous aspirations and the enlightened initiation of a

prince surrounded by the respect of Europe.” Other members of the

Conference were as warm as the representatives of Great Britain and

France in their eulogy of the great work achieved by King Leopold,

and their opinions of his Majesty’s life-work were admirably summed

up by Prince Bismarck in his speech closing the Conference, in the

course of which he referred to the consolidation of the Congo Free

State as a “precious service to the cause of humanity.”

Central Africa had now become in all essential respects a State. It

had been recognised as such by the United States on April 22, 1884,

seven months before the opening, and ten months before the close, of

the Berlin Conference, but now its geographical limits were defined,

its political status fixed, its neutrality assured. The large part

played by Leopold, King of the Belgians, in its creation had received

full and complete acknowledgment from the foremost geographers and

statesmen of the world, who had united in lauding the King, not

only for his wonderful achievement, but for the high humanitarian

motive stimulating his Majesty through all the years of its difficult

accomplishment.

[Sidenote: Hard Work Ahead.]

But let no one suppose that it followed, as a necessary consequence

of all this, that the future government of Central Africa was to

be as plain sailing in smooth water. A new State had been created,

it is true, and it had had as its sponsors the great Powers of the

world, who had recognised Leopold II., King of the Belgians, as its

Sovereign ruler. But it is beyond the ability of States, just as

it is beyond the ability of individuals, to exist without money,

and to be entrusted with the government of a territory nearly a

million square miles in extent—about a fifth the size of Europe, or

a third of the United States—inhabited by twenty millions or so of

semi-barbarous tribes, was no light task. The “African Exploration

Fund” of the Geographical Society of London contributed £250, and the

Belgian Committee collected among their countrymen 500,000 francs—a

generous gift, but utterly inadequate for such a colossal task as

the civilisation of Central Africa. Belgians, _as a people_, were

in no degree liable for the expense of the philanthropic colonial

enterprise entered upon by Leopold, their King, _as an individual_.

The magnitude of that expense will be apparent to anybody who gives

the subject a moment’s thought. The payment of explorers,—men of the

first rank in intellectual attainment, such as Stanley,—the cost

of their equipment (stores, carriers, lake steamers, etc.), the

carving out of routes, establishment of stations, purchases of land

from native chiefs, conciliatory gifts, and so forth, had seriously

depleted the large private fortune of King Leopold.

Though all civilised countries were more or less interested in the

opening up of Central Africa, less than twenty thousand dollars

was subscribed outside Belgium for that object. It had, therefore,

some years before the Berlin Conference, become necessary to raise

money for the continuation of the work. On November 25, 1878, the

_Comité d’Études du Haut-Congo_ was formed in Brussels, with King

Leopold as honorary president and Colonel Strauch as president. The

_Comité_ was really a company, and it had a capital of a million

francs. Thanks no less to its wise direction than to its sufficient

capital, the operations of the _Comité_ were attended with so much

success that it soon usurped the place of the International African

Association as principal agent of the civilising crusade undertaken

by King Leopold. The work of the _Comité_ was consolidated and

greatly accelerated by the General Act of the Berlin Conference,

assuring the Sovereignty of the Congo State to King Leopold, it being

no more than natural that Belgians should have increased confidence

in a State secure under the rule of their own King, and be disposed

to invest their money therein more freely than when the form of

its government was matter of doubt. Though much still remained to

be done, the Congo Free State had now been founded, and that fact

of itself was sufficient to inspire confidence everywhere, but

particularly among the Belgian people, whose King was its founder.

[Illustration: Making a Road (175 Kilometres) for Automobiles

(Kwango).]

The story of the Congo Free State · 第 3 / 40 章