The three ladies appear before the Prince of Wales, afterwards George

the Fourth--the "Modern Paris" who has the difficult task of awarding

the apple. The Prince re-appears in Rowlandson's famous print of

"Vauxhall Gardens" (published by J. R. Smith in 1785) with a star upon

his breast, where he is paying much attention to Mrs. Robinson--the

lovely "Perdita," whose portrait now hangs in the Wallace Collection.

The Duchess of Devonshire and her sister, Lady Duncannon, are well in

the centre of the picture; Captain Topham takes in the gay scene through

his glass; Doctor Johnson, in a supper box, seems deeply engaged upon

his meal, though Mrs. Thrale is on his right and "Bozzy" and Goldsmith

are of the party. Captain (later Colonel) Topham, the _macaroni_, man of

taste and editor of _The World_, appears in another plate of 1785--as

"Captain Epilogue," and as "Colonel Topham endeavouring to extinguish

the Genius of Holman" (the actor); and to the same date belong "Grog on

Board" and "Tea on Shore," as well as the print in colour chosen for

illustration to this chapter.

"Filial Affection," as this is called, depicting a runaway trip to

Gretna Green, speaks so fully for itself that it needs no further

description from my pen; but I may mention here its companion print

(also published by Mr. Hinton on December 15 of 1785), and called "The

Reconciliation, or The Return from Scotland," in which the pair of

fugitives--whom we have just seen presenting their horse pistols at the

parental _poursuivant_--have now returned, all penitence and submission,

and have won their forgiveness. A very curious and somewhat grisly

adaptation of "Filial Affection" is reproduced by Messrs. Bell, to

illustrate the article upon Rowlandson in their new and valuable edition

of _Bryan's Dictionary_. It is a plate from _The Dance of Death_, an

illustrated volume published by Ackermann in 1815, and resembles the

earlier print--save that the figure behind the angry parent is a

skeleton rider mounted on a skeleton steed. At this point, in touching

these two periods (of 1785 and 1815) we may note how far fresher and

more spontaneous is the figure-work in that rich period from 1785

onwards. Rowlandson had gained, perhaps, in what we may call his "Dr.

Syntax period," in the treatment of landscape perspective or the massing

of crowds, but had become more of the caricaturist, had lost the rich

organic beauty which really irradiates some of his earlier prints.

=FILIAL AFFECTION. By Thomas Rowlandson.=

A print in colour from my own collection, published by Fores only

sixteen days earlier (November 30, 1785) than "Filial Affection," may

help here to illustrate my meaning. "Intrusion on Study" or "The

Painter Disturbed," shows a very charming model, attired in nothing but

the prettiest of mob caps, posing for some goddess on the canvas of the

artist, who turns to wave his palette and brushes--a most effective

weapon of defence--in the faces of two unwelcome visitors of his own

sex, who have just broken in open-mouthed upon his study. The details of

the studio, the expressive faces of the artist and his visitors

(especially the second), are in Rowlandson's best mood; but what is more

interesting, because more exceptional, is the exquisite feeling of line,

as subtle as anything Beardsley has recorded, in the girl's recumbent

figure--in the flow of the shoulder into the right arm, and in the sweep

of the right hip, and faultless drawing of the right hand--which touches

a note of purely plastic beauty entirely beyond the reach of either

Hogarth or Gillray.

Joseph Grego says of our artist very justly: "Rowlandson's sense of

feminine loveliness, of irresistible graces of face expression and

attitude, was unequalled in its way; several of his female portraits

have been mistaken for sketches by Gainsborough or Morland, and as such,

it is possible, since the caricaturist is so little known in this

branch, that many continue to pass current."[15] An engraving which came

into my own hands, some years ago, of three young girls by Rowlandson,

might be an exact illustration of these words, and as the above writer

says, be a portrait group by Gainsborough or Hoppner--so refined and yet

so masterly was the treatment. I alluded to this print with others, when

speaking of Rowlandson as what might be here called a "feminist" in my

study of Bartolozzi and his contemporaries, and found illustration there

of this peculiarly charming type of his women in "Luxury" (typified, for

this artist, by breakfast in bed), "House Breakers," "The Inn Yard on

Fire" (where the ladies are making a very impromptu exit), in the lovely

model of "The Artist Disturbed," and (for women of fashion) in the

series (twelve prints in all) of the "Comforts of Bath."

I mention there, too, that delightful print of "Lady Hamilton at Home,"

where poor Sir William (whom the caricaturists never neglected) is

suffering from an acute attack of gout, while "the lovely Emma, in very

classic garb, is watering a flower-pot, and Miss Cornelia Knight, also

dressed after the antique, touches the strings of a lyre, and warbles

poems of her own composition." In treating, however, of Rowlandson's

women, other prints, such as "Tastes Differ," "Opera Boxes," "Harmony,"

"A Nap in Town," and "In the Country," "Interruption, or Inconvenience

of a Lodging House" (published April 1789), and "Damp Sheets" (August

1791), have a strong claim on our notice. Nor must I entirely neglect

here Rowlandson's print called "Preparation for the Academy, or Old

Joseph Nollekens and his Venus" (1800). It is perhaps the Miss Coleman

here upon the model-stand who nearly caused a domestic breach between

old Nollekens and his jealous spouse--the group on which he is at work

being his "Venus Chiding Cupid," which was modelled for Lord Yarborough.

_The Life of the Sculptor Nollekens_, by his pupil John Thomas Smith,

contains some amusing contemporary gossip. He describes the sculptor

much as we see him in this plate--his figure short, his head big, his

shoulders narrow, his body too large. His worthy better half held strong

opinions upon the sculptor's models--"abandoned hussies, with whom she

had no patience"; and Miss Coleman having ventured to visit the scene of

her early labours in a carriage and pair, the wrath of the virtuous Mrs.

Nollekens became unbounded. Words indeed (perhaps a rare defect with the

good lady) seem to have failed her at this crisis; in a later interview

with Joseph they were not wanting.

=_By Thomas Rowlandson_ A BALL AT THE HACKNEY ASSEMBLY ROOMS (REMEMBER

THE GRACES!)=

But here I would also point out that not only was our caricaturist an

unequalled illustrator of lovely woman (and as such makes us often

regret that the becoming mob cap has disappeared from use), but also a

magnificent landscape artist. I came to notice this especially last year

in a very interesting exhibition of Rowlandson's drawings at the

Leicester Gallery in London. "A Country Fete," a "Village Scene with

Bridge," and the "Promenade on Richmond Hill," were good examples of his

delightful handling of English landscape. The last of these formed part

of a very interesting set of the artist's original drawings, which were

not exhibited, but which I was able to study by kind permission.

"Greenwich Park" was among these drawings, with merrymakers racing and

tumbling down the hill, and a delicious perspective of the park and

hospital; a "Review of Guards in Hyde Park," where, upon the soldiers

firing, two of the spectators' horses have bolted into the crowd; the

charming drawing in pencil and colour work of two girls called "The

Sirens;" rustic scenes such as "Eel Pie Island at Richmond," "Playing

Quoits," and a "Rustic Maid Crossing a Stile," to her sweetheart's

admiration; such echoes too of war as the crowd cheering the great

battleships at Portsmouth, or the print of "Invaders Repulsed," where

British troops are seen driving out the French invaders.

Drawn most delicately in pencil with a wash of pure colour, these

drawings bring us nearer to the feeling of the artist than even his

prints, and it was interesting to compare "Greenwich Hill" in the print

and drawing, and to see how much the transcript had lost. Yet seen by

themselves the prints were interesting and characteristic. "A Visit to

the Uncle" and "to the Aunt," "Travelling in France, 1790"--a signed

work showing a large clumsy diligence, which the artist is

sketching--"Angelo's Fencing Room," full of contemporary portraits, "The

Pleasure of the Country," where fine ladies struggling through the mud

find a litter of piglets rushing in among their skirts, were among the

best of these, while a print of "Girls Dressing for the Masquerade," and

the "Dutch Academy," with a fat model posing before solid Dutchmen,

were among those not infrequent prints of our artist whose satire comes

near--if not over--the confines of good taste.

=_By Thomas Rowlandson_ A THEATRICAL CANDIDATE=

Some clever prints of Dr. Syntax himself were here--a subject this

which, published by Ackermann under the title of a "Tour of Dr. Syntax

in search of the Picturesque" in 1809, was republished in 1812, and

occupied the artist in various developments during his later life. To

the same period of Rowlandson's career belonged "The Microcosm of

London" (1808), "A Mad Dog in a Coffee House" (1809), and "In a Dining

Room" (1809), the print called "Exhibition Stare-case, Somerset House"

(1811)--where the visitors of both sexes are tumbling headlong

downstairs, the extraordinary cleverness of drawing scarcely

compensating for the doubtful taste of the subject; and later followed

"The World in Miniature" (1816), "Richardson's Show," "The English Dance

of Death" (1814-16), and "Dance of Life" (1817), which leads on to the

later "Tour of Dr. Syntax in search of Consolation" (1820), and (1821)

"In search of a Wife." Although Fores of Piccadilly seems to have

published many of our artist's prints during the last years of the

eighteenth century, throughout his whole career Rudolph Ackermann

remained his constant friend; to the suggestion of this latter was due

the idea of a monthly publication, which gave Rowlandson regular

employment in his later years, and resulted in the series of prints

which I have just detailed, among which the quaint, angular form of Dr.

Syntax, with his thin legs, black coat and breeches, and hooked nose,

claims a prominent place.

These subjects lead us already into the early nineteenth century, and,

as doing so, fall outside our present limit; but Rowlandson himself

belongs in his art, as much as Bunbury or Gillray, to the earlier age.

An artist of extraordinary genius, we have it on record that two

successive Presidents of the Academy in his day, Sir Joshua Reynolds and

Sir Benjamin West, in expressing their admiration of his drawings, added

their opinion that, had he chosen a higher branch of art, he might have

stood in the forefront of English contemporary painting. Instead of this

he preferred to devote his genius and his best years to caricature, and

in doing so, has bequeathed to us a rich and most precious heritage.

He was happy in his friendships. James Gillray was well known to him;

George Morland, that brilliant artist with whom he had so much in

common, Henry Angelo, whom he loved to depict among his pupils of the

foil ("Angelo's Fencing Room" and "Signora Cigali Fencing at Angelo's"),

Bannister, and Ackermann the art publisher were among his intimates. He

was less happy in the conduct of his life. Extravagance and carelessness

were combined with a passion for gambling which made him a frequent

figure in the fashionable playhouses of London; and these habits

placed the fortune, which should have been his by industry and

inheritance, beyond his reach. The legacy of L7000 bequeathed him by his

French aunt, who had treated him so generously in his student days, was

speedily dissipated in this way. Indeed, but for the frequent advice and

assistance of his friend and publisher, Rudolph Ackermann, he might have

found himself in serious difficulties; and the story runs that on one

occasion he sat for thirty-six hours at the cards, and that on another,

after losing all he had, he sat down coolly to his work and (raising

that facile pencil of his) said, "Here is my resource." Thus it was

that, after many years of fertile labour, he died a poor man in lodgings

at the Adelphi, on the 22nd of April, 1827. His faithful friends of

earlier days, Henry Angelo, Bannister, and Rudolph Ackermann, followed

to his grave the last great caricaturist of the bygone century.

=_By Thomas Rowlandson_ OLD JOSEPH NOLLEKENS AND HIS VENUS=

In these pages we have traced together the record of that century in

English Caricature; and if we have been compelled to note but hastily

the lesser men, have, in so doing, at least gained breathing space to

study four great and typical figures. We saw how William Hogarth, when

he handles the graver as humourist and delineator of character, stands

forth immortally great; how, when he sought to place himself at the head

of the nascent English School, he fell beneath his own level. We saw in

Henry William Bunbury the cultured artist, soldier, and man of society,

the welcome guest in many a great country-house, who could bring his

host's pretty daughters into some charming sketch, or take his part in

the improvised theatricals; but whose prints have real humour, charm,

and the sweet, wholesome breath of English country life. Then we watched

Gillray tower aloft in political satire, and Rowlandson's pencil touch

every side of life.

If we noticed at the same time a certain coarseness of fibre come to the

surface in much of their work, finding expression often both in subject,

and still more in treatment and in type, we must remember that this

quality belongs not to the men alone, but to the age. The more sensitive

modern may feel himself at first repelled rather than attracted, and

many a print of Rowlandson or Gillray find a place in his _Index

Expurgatorius_; but the brutality of these men is the brutality of

Nature in some of her moods, and their work, like Nature, fertile,

fresh, and vigorous, attracts us (as all strong work will and must) the

more we study it by its masterly drawing, its free, open humour, and

often its high imaginative grasp.

Behind these men, these Masters of English Caricature, appears, never

entirely absent from our thought, the history of the century, with its

magnificent record of English achievement. Behind them, too, a

corrective and a stimulant to their best effort, is that wonderful

revelation of English eighteenth-century pictorial art. For just as

when, in years to come, men think on that stirring epoch, the two words

_England_ and _Liberty_ will leap unbidden to their thought; so, too,

in the record of the greatest epoch of our country's art, a place must

be found for the English Caricaturists of the Eighteenth Century.

Printed by BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO.

London & Edinburgh

Footnotes:

[1] A fine collection of lithographs of Honore Daumier (1808-1879) has

this year been exhibited in the Victoria and Albert Museum.

[2] "The Works of William Hogarth, elucidated by Descriptions." By T.

Clerk. London, 1810.

[3] "William Hogarth," by Austin Dobson; with a valuable technical

introduction by Sir W. Armstrong. London, 1902.

[4] "Bartolozzi and his Pupils in England" (Langham Series). By Selwyn

Brinton. London, 1903.

[5] "History of Caricature and of Grotesque in Art." By Thomas Wright,

M.A., F.S.A. London, 1863.

[6] His "Englishman at Paris" even predates this by four years (1767).

The British Museum etchings, to which I allude later, are early work,

one even dating from his schooldays at Westminster!

[7] _Op. cit._ p. 63.

[8] I give a plate of this beautiful Eliza Farren (painted by Lawrence,

engraved by Bartolozzi) in my work on Bartolozzi in this Series (facing

p. 63). Gillray has an amusing print of the diminutive Lord Derby,

standing on his coronet to admire himself in the glass.

[9] They are all enjoying their new diet under similar conditions. In

Italy (perhaps the cleverest hit of all) the old Pope, seated, is having

the bread shot into his open mouth from a French soldier's blunderbuss,

while an assistant at the same moment neatly removes from his head the

triple crown.

[10] Mme. Vigee le Brun, in her delightful memoirs, gives some

justification to Gillray's severe treatment. Visiting Lady Hamilton soon

after Sir William's death she found "this Andromache" draped in black,

and extremely fat.

[11] In "Two-penny Whist" appear the worthy Mrs. Humphrey and her maid

Betty; in "Push-pin" the Duke of Queensbury and the Duchess of Gordon.

[12] _The Magazine of Art_, 1901.

[13] Rudolph Ackermann occupies almost the same position to Rowlandson

that Mistress Humphrey did to Gillray, as his early and faithful friend

and principal publisher.

[14] _Bartolozzi and His Pupils in England_, p. 46.

[15] _Rowlandson, the Caricaturist._ By Joseph Grego. 1880.

Transcriber's Notes:

Passages in italics are indicated by _italics_.

Illustration captions are represented by =caption=.

Additional spacing after some of the quotes is intentional to indicate

both the end of a quotation and the beginning of a new paragraph as

presented in the original text.

Missing quotation marks have been added.

Misprint "and and" corrected to "and" (page 82).

Otherwise, text matches original printing.

The Eighteenth Century in English Caricature · 第 4 / 4 段