CHAPTER IV.

THE GREAT SEA-LIZARDS AND THEIR ALLIES.

"The wonders of geology exercise every faculty of the

mind--reason, memory, imagination; and though we cannot put

our fossils to the question, it is something to be so aroused

as to be made to put the questions to one's self."--Hugh

Miller.

The fish-lizards, described in our last chapter, were not the only

predaceous monsters that haunted the seas of the great Mesozoic age,

or era. We must now say a few words about certain contemporary

creatures that shared with them the spoils of those old seas, so

teeming with life. And first among these--as being more fully

known--come the long-necked sea-lizards, or Plesiosaurs.

The Plesiosaurus was first discovered in the Lias rocks of Lyme-Regis,

in the year 1821. It was christened by the above name, and introduced

to the scientific world by the Rev. Mr. Conybeare (afterwards Dean of

Llandaff) and Mr. (afterwards Sir Henry) de la Beche. They gave it

this name in order to distinguish it from the Ichthyosaurus, and to

record the fact that it was more nearly allied to the lizard than the

latter.[9] Conybeare, with the assistance of De la Beche, first

described it in a now-classic paper read before the Geological Society

of London, and published in the _Transactions_ of that Society in the

year 1821. In a later paper (1824) he gave a restoration of the

entire skeleton of Plesiosaurus dolichodeirus; and the accuracy of

that restoration is still universally acknowledged. This fine specimen

was in the possession of the Duke of Buckingham, who kindly placed it

at the disposal of Dr. Buckland, for a time, that it might be properly

described and investigated.

[9] The name is derived from two Greek words--_plesios_, near, or

allied to, and _sauros_, a lizard.

A glance at our illustration, Plate III., will show that this strange

creature was not inaptly compared at the time to a snake threaded

through the body of a turtle.

Dr. Buckland truly observes that the discovery of this genus forms one

of the most important additions that geology has made to comparative

anatomy. "It is of the Plesiosaurus," says that graphic author, in his

_Bridgewater Treatise_, "that Cuvier asserts the structure to have

been the most heteroclite, and its characters altogether the most

monstrous that have been yet found amid the ruins of a former world.

To the head of a lizard it united the teeth of a crocodile; a neck of

enormous length, resembling the body of a serpent; a trunk and tail

having the proportions of an ordinary quadruped; the ribs of a

chameleon, and the paddles of a whale! Such are the strange

combinations of form and structure in the Plesiosaurus--a genus, the

remains of which, after interment for thousands of years amidst the

wreck of millions of extinct inhabitants of the ancient earth, are at

length recalled to light by the researches of the geologist, and

submitted to our examination in nearly as perfect a state as the bones

of species that are now existing upon the earth."

Perhaps the best way in which we can gain a clear idea of the general

characters of a long-necked sea-lizard, as we may call our

Plesiosaurus, is by comparing it with the fish-lizard, described in

the last chapter. Its long neck and small head are the most

conspicuous features. Then we notice the short tail. But if we compare

the paddles of these two extinct forms of life, we notice at once

certain important differences. In the fish-lizard the bone of the arm

was very short, while all the bones of the fore-arm and fingers were

modified into little many-sided bodies, and so articulated together as

to make the whole limb, or paddle, a solid yet flexible structure. In

the long-necked sea-lizard, however, we find a long arm-bone with a

club-like shape; and the two bones of the fore-arm are seen to be

longer than in the fish-lizard. But a still greater difference shows

itself in the bones of the finger, as we look at a fossilised skeleton

(or a drawing of one); for the fingers are long and slender, like

those of ordinary reptiles.

There are only five fingers, and each finger is quite distinct from

the others. This is the reason why the Plesiosaur was considered to

depart less from the type of an ordinary reptile, and so received its

name. Other remarkable differences present themselves in the shoulders

and haunches, but these need not be considered here. The species shown

in Fig. 8 had rather a large head. It is obvious that such a long

slender neck as these creatures had could not have supported a large

head, like that of the fish-lizard. Consequently, we find a striking

contrast in the skulls of the two forms. That of the Plesiosaur was

short and stout, and therefore such as could easily be supported, as

well as rapidly moved about by the long slender neck. Thus we find

another simple illustration of the "law of correlation," alluded to on

p. 6. The teeth were set in distinct sockets, as they are in

crocodiles, to which animals there are also points of resemblance, in

the backbone, ribs, and skull. Fig. 7 shows three different types of

lower jaws of Plesiosaurs. The one marked C belongs to Plesiosaurus

dolichodeirus, the species represented in our plate. There were no

bony plates in the eye. Professor Owen thinks that they were

long-lived. The skin was probably smooth, like that of a porpoise.

[Illustration: Plate III.

PTERODACTYLS. LONG-NECKED SEA-LIZARD. CUTTLE-FISH OR BELEMNITE.

_Plesiosaurus dolichodeirus._

Length 22 feet.]

[Illustration: Fig. 7.--Mandibles of Fish-lizards. A, _Peloneustes

philarchus_ (Seeley); from the Oxford Clay. B, _Thaumatosaurus

indicus_ (Lydekker); Upper Jurassic of India. C, _Plesiosaurus

aolichodirus_ (Conybeare); from the Lower Lias, Lyme Regis.]

The visitor to the geological collection at South Kensington will find

a splendid series of the fossilised remains of long-necked

sea-lizards. They were mostly obtained from the Lias formation of

Street in Somersetshire, Lyme-Regis in Dorset, and Whitby in

Yorkshire. Those from the Lias are mostly small, about eight to ten

feet in length. But in the rocks of the Cretaceous period, which was

later, are found larger specimens. There is a cast of a very fine

specimen from the Upper Lias on the wall of the east corridor (No. 3

on Plan) of the geological galleries at South Kensington, which is

twenty-two feet long. But some of the Cretaceous forms, both in Europe

and America, attained a length of forty feet, and had vertebræ six

inches in diameter. The bodies of the vertebræ, or "cup-bones," are

either flat or slightly concave, showing that the backbone as a whole

was less flexible than in the fish-lizards.

[Illustration: Fig. 8.--_Plesiosaurus macrocephalus._]

It may be mentioned here that Mr. Smith Woodward, of the Natural

History Museum, recently showed the writer a fossil Plesiosaur that is

being set up in the formatore's shop, in the same manner that a recent

skeleton might be. In this, and many other ways, the guardians of the

national treasure-house are endeavouring to make the collection

intelligible and interesting to the general public. Specimens of

extinct animals thus set up, give one a much better idea than when the

bones are all lying huddled together on a slab of rock. But it is not

always possible to get the bones entirely out of their rocky bed, or

matrix. Great credit is due to Mr. Alfred N. Leeds, of Eyebury, who

has disinterred the separate bones of many distinct skeletons of

Plesiosaurs from Oxford Clay strata near Peterborough.

It will be remembered that the long and powerful tail of the

fish-lizard was its principal organ of propulsion through the water;

and that, consequently, the paddles only played a secondary part. They

were small, but amply large enough for the work they had to perform.

But our long-necked sea-lizards possessed very short tails. What,

then, was the consequence? Obviously that the paddles had all the more

work to do. They were the chief swimming organs. The vertebræ of this

short tail show that it probably was highly flexible, and could move

rapidly from side to side; but, for all that, its use as a propeller

would not be of much importance. We see now why the paddles are so

long and powerful, like two pairs of great oars, one pair on each side

of the body. In a fossil skeleton you will notice the flattened shape

of the arm-bone (or humerus), and of the thigh-bone (or femur). This

gave breadth to the paddles, and made them more efficient as swimming

organs. They give no indication of having carried even such imperfect

claws as those of turtles and seals, and therefore we may conclude

that the Plesiosaur was far more at home in the water than on land,

and it seems probable that progression on land was impossible.

The tail was probably useful as a rudder, to steer the animal when

swimming on the surface, and to elevate or depress it in ascending and

descending through the water. Like the fish-lizard, this creature was

an air-breather, and therefore was obliged occasionally to visit the

surface for fresh supplies of air. But probably it possessed the power

of compressing air within its lungs, so that the frequency of its

visits to the surface would not be very great.

From the long neck and head, situated so far away from the paddles, as

well as for other reasons, it may be concluded that this creature was

a rapid swimmer, as was the Ichthyosaurus. Although of considerable

size, it probably had to seek its food, as well as its safety, chiefly

by artifice and concealment. The fish-lizard, its contemporary, must

have been a formidable rival and a dangerous enemy, whom to attack

would be unadvisable.

Speaking of the habits of the long-necked sea-lizard, Mr. Conybeare,

in his second paper, already alluded to, says, "That it was aquatic,

is evident from the form of its paddles; that it was marine, is almost

equally so, from the remains with which it is universally associated;

that it may occasionally have visited the shore, the resemblance of

its extremities to those of the turtle may lead us to conjecture; its

motion, however, must have been very awkward on land; its long neck

must have impeded its progress through the water, presenting a

striking contrast to the organisation which so admirably fits the

Ichthyosaurus to cut through the waves.

"May it not therefore be concluded (since, in addition to these

circumstances, its respiration must have required frequent access of

air) that it swam upon or near the surface, arching back its long neck

like the swan, occasionally darting it down at the fish which happened

to float within its reach? It may, perhaps, have lurked in shoal-water

along the coast, concealed among the sea-weed, and, raising its

nostrils to a level with the surface from a considerable depth, may

have found a secure retreat from the assaults of dangerous enemies;

while the length and flexibility of its neck may have compensated for

the want of strength in its jaws and its incapacity for swift motion

through the water, by the suddenness and agility of the attack which

they enabled it to make on every animal fitted for its prey, which

came within its extensive sweep."

More than twenty species of long-necked sea-lizards are known to

geologists.

Professor Owen, in his great work on _British Fossil Reptiles_, when

describing the huge Plesiosaurus dolichodeirus from Dorset, suggests

that the carcase of this monster, after it sank to the bottom of the

sea, was preyed upon by some carnivorous animal (perhaps sharks). It

seems, he says, as if a bite of the neck had pulled out of place the

eighth to the twelfth vertebræ. Those at the base of the neck are

scattered and dispersed as if through more "tugging and riving." So

with regard to its body, probably some hungry creature had a grip of

the spine near the middle of the back, and pulled all the succeeding

vertebræ in the region of the hind limbs. Thus we get a little glimpse

of scenes of violence that took place at the bottom of the bright

sunny seas of the period when the clays and limestones of the Lias

rocks were being deposited in the region of Lyme-Regis.

As time went on, these curious reptiles increased in size, until, in

the period when our English chalk was being formed (Cretaceous

period), they reached their highest point (see p. 147). After that

they became extinct--whether slowly or somewhat suddenly we cannot

tell.

Until more is known of the ancient life of the earth, it will not be

possible to say with certainty what were the nearest relations of the

long-necked sea-lizards. They first appear in the strata of the New

Red Sandstone, which is below the Lias. Certain little reptiles, about

three feet long, from the former rocks, known as Neusticosaurus and

Lariosaurus, seem to be rather closely related to the creatures we are

now considering, and to connect them with another group, namely, the

Pliosaurs. They were partly terrestrial and partly aquatic; but it is

not easy to say whether their limbs had been converted into true

paddles or not. At any rate, there is every reason to believe that the

long-necked sea-lizards were descended from an earlier form of land

reptile. They gradually underwent considerable modifications, in order

to adapt themselves to an aquatic life. We noticed that the same

conclusion has been arrived at with regard to the fish-lizards. Both

these extinct groups, therefore, present an interesting analogy to

whales, which are now considered to have been derived, by a like

series of changes, from mammals that once walked the earth.

The Plesiosaur presents, on the one hand, points of resemblance to

turtles and lizards,--on the other hand, to crocodiles, whales, and,

according to some authorities, even the strange Ornithorhynchus. But

it will be very long before its ancestry can be made known. In the

mean time, we must put it in a place somewhere near the fish-lizards,

and leave posterity to complete what has at present only been begun.

It must, however, be borne in mind that some of the above resemblances

are purely accidental, and not such as point to relationship. Because

their flippers are like those of a whale, it does not mean that

Plesiosaurs are related to modern whales. It only means that similar

habits tend to produce accidental resemblances--just as the whales and

porpoises, in their turn, resemble fishes. To make torpedoes go

rapidly through the water, inventors have given them a fish-like

shape;--in the same way the early forms of mammals, from which whales

are descended, gradually adapted themselves to a life in the water,

and so became modified to some extent to the shapes of fishes.

The Pliosaurs, above mentioned, are evidently relations, but with

short necks instead of long ones. They had enormous heads and thick

necks. Fine specimens of their huge jaws, paddle-bones, etc., may be

seen at the end of the reptile-gallery at Cromwell Road. One of the

skulls exhibited there is nearly six feet long, while a hind paddle

measures upwards of six and a half feet in length, of which

thirty-seven inches is taken up by the thigh-bone alone. The teeth at

the end of the jaws are truly enormous. One tooth, from a deposit

known as the Kimmeridge Clay, is nearly a foot long from the tip of

the crown to the base of the root. In some, the two jaw-bones of the

lower jaw are partly united, as in the sperm-whale or cachalot.

Creatures so armed must have been very destructive.

Extinct Monsters A Popular Account of Some of the Larger Forms of Ancient Animal Life · 第 4 / 16 章