CHAPTER IV

HOW TO ARRIVE AT THE VALUE OF A PATENT

Most inventors are not concerned so much about the fame or honor their

inventions will bring them, or how much their inventions will advance

civilization, or build up a nation, or administer to the conveniences

and pleasures of mankind generally, as they are about how much it will

net them in dollars and cents; but the patentee should not lose sight of

the fact that the profits are in the exact proportion to the actual

usefulness of the invention, and its general adaptability. It is

immaterial whether the inventor himself intends to deal with the public,

or to deal with a man or set of men who are afterward to deal with the

public, the conditions are the same, and the profits must ultimately

come from the sale of the manufactured article.

[Sidenote: Pecuniary Value.]

It may seem superfluous to say that mere Letters Patent aside from an

invention is of no value, though many inventors are under the erroneous

impression that if an invention possesses patentability, it must also

necessarily have pecuniary value. To be of any pecuniary value

whatever, the invention must cover something for which there is a

demand, or for which there can be a demand created, for it cannot be

disputed, that if an invention will not bring in money by manufacturing

it, it is, in a financial sense, worthless; and the patent thereon is

therefore worth some seventy or eighty dollars less than nothing.

[Sidenote: Commercial Value.]

An invention, to have commercial value, as previously stated, must cover

something for which there is a demand, or for which there can be a

demand created. It may be an entirely new device, or it may be an

improvement upon an existing invention, but in any event it must contain

a certain degree of utility. In rare cases inventors are able to hit

upon an invention in an entirely new field; for these a demand has to be

created. For improvements, however, as a general thing, the demand

already exists; then the important question arises in determining the

commercial value of the patent. "Does the invention in question possess

sufficient merit to successfully compete with existing devices of the

same class?" In order to do this, it must be of a simpler or cheaper

construction, so that it can be manufactured and put on the market at a

lower figure; or, it must yield better results, work quicker and at less

expense, or economize power, labor, or time. A patented improvement

upon an article that can be sold more cheaply, or one which will yield

better results than those now selling well on the market, has a decided

commercial value and can easily be disposed of at a good price. If the

inventor be fortunate enough to combine both of these features in his

invention, the value is doubled and success certain.

[Sidenote: Basis for Estimation.]

Perhaps one of the hardest questions that confronts the patentee is how

to arrive at a just valuation of his patent, and to know just exactly

what he should receive for it. This is a very important question, and

one which should be looked into before undertaking negotiations.

Patentees should not, of course, undervalue their patents, or accept the

first small offer made for fear of not receiving another; at the same

time, they should not fall into the common error of asking a price that

cannot be obtained, which too frequently precludes all chances of a

sale. Many business men would rather lose the patent than waste their

time constantly dickering about an unreasonable price.

Inventors should be reasonable in their demands, and consider that the

purchaser must have a fair share of the profits. He cannot expect to

realize all there is in the patent himself. Indeed, patentees usually

find that men willing to establish a business on the basis of their

untried patents will require the greater bulk of the profits to be

derived from it.

[Sidenote: General Rules for Valuation.]

It is evident that only the most general rules for valuation can be

given, as each invention must be studied and valued strictly upon its

own merits. Undoubtedly, the best and most practical method of

ascertaining the value of any invention which is susceptible of being

manufactured on a small scale is to have a limited quantity of the

articles manufactured--say five hundred or a thousand--and try the

experiment of introducing them in a small territory; that is, in a

certain county, city, or town, taking great precaution in selecting a

person who is capable of carrying forward the business in a

business-like manner. This method demonstrates conclusively whether or

not the invention will meet with success, and with these figures at hand

the patentee will be prepared to prove, to the satisfaction of

interested parties, just what the patent is really worth.

This method of procedure not only enables the patentee to get a just

valuation of his patent, but also puts it in a more favorable position

to be sold; since the commercial value is known and established, it no

longer remains an experiment. Interested parties can take their

calculations from these figures, and the patentee can exact a price in

proportion to the success of the trial experiment.

In order to thus demonstrate the value of a patent, the patentee must

possess and advance the necessary means to carry it forward, though, if

the experiment prove at all successful, the profits derived from the

articles sold will in nearly all cases more than offset the expense

incurred. This is a very popular course with inventors, especially in

handling small inventions, known as novelty or specialty patents.

If the patentee have not the means to successfully demonstrate the value

of his patent by actual trial, as above outlined, then the next best

course would be to inquire among reliable manufacturers and ascertain

the lowest price for which the invention can be manufactured in large

quantities, and the highest price at which it will retail; and then, by

carefully studying the market, the patentee should be able to estimate

the amount of competition, cost of selling, probable number of sales,

interest on the investment, etc., and on these figures base the price he

should receive for the patent, being careful to allow the purchaser a

liberally fair profit.

While there are at present about ninety-five million inhabitants in the

United States, it is scarcely probable that any invention has yet or

ever will be made that will reach half this number of people. With an

article of the most general adaptability, including both sexes, the

inventor can hardly hope to reach more than a fourth of the entire

population, though, of course, the invention may be subject to regular

consumption, so that the people reached would naturally purchase the

article again a number of times during the course of a year.

The statistics in the last chapter are given with the view of assisting

patentees in determining what proportion of the population will likely

want their inventions, and to enable them to estimate prices. In

estimating the price to ask for a patent, patentees should not conceive

and hang their hopes upon fabulous prices and immediate wealth, which

too often dooms ambitious inventors to bitter disappointment; they

should rather endeavor to look at their inventions from the purchaser's

stand-point, and try to see it in the light in which others view it. It

may be well to remember that the million mark of patents issued in the

United States, including re-issues and designs, was passed in 1911, and

it is quite probable that any one inventor may not have the only good

thing in the line of patents.

[Sidenote: How Rating for Royalty Is Figured.]

Many patents are more profitable by being placed upon royalty than by

any other means, and quite often the patent can be placed this way when

it is not possible to sell outright at a satisfactory price. In

determining what royalty the patentee should receive, he should

carefully estimate, in connection with the probable number of sales,

what profit the manufacturer can probably make on each, or a number of

the articles containing the patented improvements, and should require

about twenty-five per cent. of the profits as royalty. Another method

used by some inventors is to ascertain the price at which the article

can be retailed, and figure the royalty at between one-twentieth and

one-tenth of the retail price. Either of the above should give the

approximate figure to ask for exclusive royalty contracts. For

non-exclusive rights the patentee should ask about one-half of that for

exclusive rights.

[Sidenote: Stock in Stock Companies.]

There is another class of patents that can be best realized from by

organizing the proper kind of joint stock companies, and manufacturing

the invention, the inventor taking a certain amount of the stock and

assigning the patent to the company. The patentee should receive between

one-fourth and one-half of the capital stock in consideration of his

assigning his patent and rights to the company.

The inventor should see that a good portion of the stock is subscribed

for and the amount actually paid into the treasury of the company before

making the assignment. As a rule, inventors' stock is full paid and

non-assessable.

[Sidenote: Prices for Territorial Rights.]

In calculating the prices for territorial rights, the application of the

invention to that section must be taken into consideration, as well as

the advancement in manufacturing, etc. If the invention belongs to that

class of inventions which may be generally adapted in all States alike,

such as domestic articles and articles of wearing apparel, then the

population will form a very satisfactory basis for valuation.

There are other inventions, however, that apply almost wholly to a

certain section of the country, while still others apply more to one

section than to another; thus, for instance, mechanical contrivances of

the higher order, such as writing machines, mathematical instruments,

etc., the North and East are the most valuable; for mining and

agricultural implements, etc., the West; while such as the cotton-gin,

seeders, and presses apply almost wholly to the South. States and

counties having large cities and large towns are also usually more

valuable than other States and counties of same population.

[Sidenote: Valuation Tables.]

The following tables are given as a general estimate of the relative

value of the different States and divisions in the majority of cases;

however, these tables are only arbitrary at best, and cannot be applied

to all classes of inventions satisfactorily, though they may serve to

materially aid the patentee in determining what price to put upon each

State in his own case. Having determined the value of the patent as a

whole, the aggregate of the State prices should be about two-thirds

more, as there are always some States that cannot be sold separately,

while others may have to be sold at a discount.

TABLES FOR ESTIMATING PRICES OF STATE RIGHTS

-----------------+--------------------------------------------------

STATES AND | PRICE AS A WHOLE.

TERRITORIES. |---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

| $1,000 | $5,000 | $10,000 | $15,000 | $20,000

-----------------+---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

Maine | 35 | 175 | 350 | 500 | 700

New Hampshire | 30 | 150 | 300 | 450 | 600

Vermont | 30 | 150 | 300 | 450 | 600

Massachusetts | 50 | 225 | 500 | 750 | 1,000

Rhode Island | 20 | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400

Connecticut | 35 | 175 | 350 | 500 | 700

New York | 65 | 300 | 650 | 950 | 1,200

Pennsylvania | 65 | 300 | 650 | 950 | 1,200

New Jersey | 40 | 200 | 400 | 600 | 800

+---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

N. ATLANTIC | $370 | $1,775 | $3,700 | $5,450 |$7,200

DIVISION | | | | |

-----------------+---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

TABLES FOR ESTIMATING PRICES OF STATE RIGHTS--_Continued_

-----------------+--------------------------------------------------

STATES AND | PRICE AS A WHOLE.

TERRITORIES. |---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

| $1,000 | $5,000 | $10,000 | $15,000 | $20,000

-----------------+---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

Delaware | 20 | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400

Maryland | 40 | 200 | 400 | 600 | 800

District of | 15 | 75 | 150 | 200 | 300

Columbia | | | | |

Virginia | 35 | 200 | 400 | 600 | 800

West Virginia | 35 | 175 | 300 | 500 | 700

North Carolina | 35 | 150 | 300 | 450 | 600

South Carolina | 35 | 150 | 350 | 500 | 700

Georgia | 40 | 200 | 400 | 600 | 800

Florida | 15 | 75 | 150 | 200 | 300

+---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

S. ATLANTIC | $270 | $1,325 | $2,700 | $3,950 |$5,400

DIVISION | | | | |

| | | | |

Ohio | 60 | 300 | 600 | 900 | 1,100

Indiana | 55 | 275 | 550 | 800 | 1,000

Illinois | 65 | 300 | 650 | 950 | 1,200

Michigan | 45 | 200 | 350 | 600 | 800

Wisconsin | 40 | 150 | 275 | 400 | 500

Minnesota | 45 | 200 | 350 | 600 | 800

Iowa | 40 | 175 | 350 | 500 | 700

Missouri | 45 | 225 | 450 | 650 | 900

North Dakota | 25 | 75 | 150 | 200 | 300

South Dakota | 30 | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400

Nebraska | 30 | 150 | 300 | 450 | 600

Kansas | 40 | 175 | 300 | 500 | 700

+---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

N. CENTRAL | $485 | $2,325 | $4,525 | $6,850 |$9,000

DIVISION | | | | |

-----------------+---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

TABLES FOR ESTIMATING PRICES OF STATE RIGHTS--_Continued_

-----------------+--------------------------------------------------

STATES AND | PRICE AS A WHOLE.

TERRITORIES. |---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

| $1,000 | $5,000 | $10,000 | $15,000 | $20,000

-----------------+---------+---------+----------+----------+----------

Kentucky | 40 | 200 | 375 | 600 | 700

Tennessee | 30 | 175 | 350 | 500 | 700

Alabama | 30 | 150 | 300 | 450 | 600

Mississippi | 30 | 150 | 300 | 450 | 600

Louisiana | 35 | 175 | 300 | 500 | 700

Texas | 35 | 175 | 300 | 500 | 700

Oklahoma | 20 | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400

Arkansas | 20 | 75 | 150 | 200 | 300

+---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

S. CENTRAL | $230 | $1,200 | $2,275 | $3,500 |$4,700

DIVISION | | | | |

| | | | |

Montana | 15 | 100 | 175 | 250 | 300

Colorado | 40 | 175 | 350 | 350 | 700

New Mexico | 15 | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200

Arizona | 15 | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200

Utah | 15 | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200

Idaho | 10 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 200

Washington | 15 | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200

Oregon | 20 | 75 | 125 | 200 | 300

California | 50 | 250 | 450 | 700 | 900

+---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

WESTERN DIVISION | $235 | $975 | $1,800 | $2,750 |$3,700

+=========+=========+==========+==========+========

GRAND TOTAL | $1,600 | $7,600 | $15,000 |$22,500 |$30,000

-----------------+---------+---------+----------+----------+--------

Practical Pointers for Patentees · 第 4 / 10 章