and school attendance committees are abolished and their powers and
duties are transferred to the L.E.A., who are also to be responsible
for and have the control of all secular instruction in public
elementary schools not provided by them (S 5).
(2) Management of schools. (a) For public elementary schools provided
by the L.E.A. (now officially styled "council schools"): (1) in
counties, there is to be a body of six managers, viz. four appointed
by the county council and two by the borough or urban district
council, or parish council or parish meeting as the case may be,
called in the act the minor local authority; (2) in non-county areas,
the L.E.A. (being the borough or urban district council) may, if they
think fit, appoint a body of managers consisting of such number as
they may determine (S 6 [1]).
(b) For schools not provided by the L.E.A. (voluntary schools) the act
directs that there shall be a body of six managers, of whom four are
to be "foundation managers," and two are to be appointed as follows:
in counties, one by the L.E.A. and one by the minor local authority,
and in autonomous boroughs or urban districts both by the borough or
urban district council (S 6 [2]). Directions for the appointment of
foundation managers are given by S 11, which in effect declares that,
unless the trust deed of the school provides for the appointment of
the required number, the foundation managers must be appointed under
an order of the Board of Education, in making which the board are to
have regard to the ownership of the school building and to the
principles on which the education given in the school had been
conducted in the past. It was found necessary for the board to make
over 11,000 of these orders, a heavy task which was rendered the more
formidable by the controversial character of the questions arising
upon trust deeds as to the mode of appointment and the qualifications
of managers.
(3) Maintenance of schools (S 7). (a) Powers. The L.E.A. are required
to maintain and keep efficient all public elementary schools which
were necessary (i.e. which, as defined by S 9, have an average
attendance of not less than thirty), under certain specified
conditions, of which the most material are as follows. The managers
must carry out the directions of the L.E.A. as to the secular
instruction to be given in the school, including any directions with
respect to the number and educational qualifications of the teachers,
and for the dismissal of any teacher on educational grounds (S 7 [1]
[a]). The consent of the L.E.A. is required to the appointment of
teachers, but that consent may not be withheld except on educational
grounds; and the consent of the authority is also required to the
dismissal of a teacher unless the dismissal is on grounds connected
with the giving of religious instruction (S7 [1] [c]).
(b) Liabilities. The managers are required to provide the school
premises to the L.E.A. for use as a public elementary school free of
charge, except that a rent is payable for the teacher's residence
where one exists; and the managers are further required out of funds
provided by them to keep the school premises in good repair and to
make such alterations and improvements in the buildings as might
reasonably be required by the L.E.A. On the other hand, the L.E.A. are
required to make good such damage as they consider to be due to fair
wear and tear of rooms used by them (S 7 [1] [d]). Thus, by virtue of
the teacher's house rent and the wear-and-tear allowance the voluntary
managers secured a valuable set-off against the cost of ordinary
repairs.
Any question arising under this section (S 7) between the L.E.A. and
the managers of a voluntary school is to be determined by the Board of
Education (S 7 [3]).
It is further provided with respect to teachers in voluntary schools
that assistant teachers and pupil teachers may be appointed "if it is
thought fit" without reference to religious creed and denomination,
and in any case in which there are more candidates for the post of
pupil teacher than there are places to be filled, the appointment is
to be made by the L.E.A. (S 7. [5]).
A provision, S 7 (6), known from the name of its author (d. 1908),
Colonel Kenyon Slaney, M.P., as the Kenyon-Slaney clause, attracted
considerable attention and formed the subject of much ecclesiastical
controversy during the passage of the bill through parliament. The
Kenyon-Slaney clause requires the religious instruction in voluntary
schools to be in accordance with the provisions (if any) of the trust
deed, but also to be under the control of the managers as a whole,
whereas the common form of trust deed of the National Society reserves
the control of religious instruction to the clergyman, whilst the
clause was equally in conflict with the well-known sacerdotal
principles of the Roman Catholic Church. Thus the clause represented a
revival, as did the questions with respect to foundation managers, of
the early controversy over the management clauses of the Committee of
Council on Education. Its special interest lies, not so much in its
intrinsic importance, as in the precedent it affords, specially
notable as emanating from a Conservative source, for the overruling of
trust deeds upon grounds of public policy. By way of saving another
familiar provision of the trust deeds, a proviso to the Kenyon-Slaney
clause reserves the existing trust-deed rights of appeal to the bishop
or other denominational authority as to the character of the religious
instruction.
_Provision of New Schools._--New schools may be provided either by the
L.E.A. or any other persons, subject to the issue of three months'
public notice, and to a right of appeal on the part of the managers of
any existing school, the L.E.A. (in the case of proposed voluntary
schools) or any ten ratepayers of the district, to the Board of
Education on the ground that the proposed school is not required, or
that a school provided by the L.E.A., or not so provided, as the case
might be, is better suited to meet the wants of the district than the
proposed school. Any enlargement of a public elementary school which
in the opinion of the Board of Education is such as to amount to the
provision of a new school is to be so treated for the purposes of the
section, and any transfer of a school to or from the L.E.A. must be
treated as the provision of a new school. In deciding appeals as to
new schools and in determining a case of dispute whether a school was
necessary or not, the board are directed to have regard to the
interest of secular instruction, the wishes of parents as to the
education of children, and the economy of the rates, but existing
schools are not to be considered unnecessary if the average attendance
is not less than thirty (SS 8-9). The last-mentioned canons have
played a prominent part in subsequent discussions. Experience of these
sections has shown that though it is extremely difficult to set up new
voluntary schools in face of opposition from the L.E.A., such
opposition is rarely offered or pressed where any really strong local
demand is shown to exist.
_Aid Grant._--Section 10 provides a new aid grant payable to the
L.E.A. in respect of the number of scholars in average attendance in
schools maintained by them. This new grant, calculated by an elaborate
method which need not here be set out, took the place of the grants
under the Voluntary Schools Act 1897, and S 97 of the act of 1870 as
amended by the Elementary Education Act 1897.
_Education Committees._--The constitution of education committees is
dealt with by S 17. All councils having powers under the act, except
those having concurrent powers as to higher education only, must
establish education committees in accordance with schemes made by the
councils and approved by the Board of Education (S 17 [1]). A scheme
may provide for more than one education committee under a single
council, but before approving such a scheme the board must satisfy
themselves that due regard is paid to the importance of the general
co-ordination of all forms of education (S 17 [6]). All matters
relating to the exercise by a council of their powers under the act,
except the power of raising a rate or borrowing money, stand referred
to the education committee; the council may also delegate to the
education committee any of their powers other than financial powers as
above (S 17 [2]). Every scheme must provide (a) for the appointment of
a majority of the committee by the council, the persons so appointed
to be persons who are members of the council unless in the case of a
county the council otherwise determine; (b) for the appointment by the
council, on the nomination or recommendation, where it appears
desirable, of other bodies (including associations of voluntary
schools) of persons of experience in education, and of persons
acquainted with the needs of the various kinds of schools in the area
of the council; (c) for the inclusion of women. Provision was also
made (d) for the representation in the first instance of members of
existing school boards (S 17 [3]).
_Expenses._--All parliamentary grants are made payable to the L.E.A.
instead of as previously to the managers (S 18 [2]). The county
council must charge a proportion of all capital expenditure and
liabilities, including rent, on account of the provision or
improvement of any public elementary school on the parish or parishes
which in the opinion of the council are served by the school, such
proportion to be not less than one-half or more than three-fourths as
the council think fit (S 18 [1] [c] [d]). The county council may also
if they think fit charge on the parishes benefited any expenses
incurred with respect to education other than elementary (S 18 [1]
[a]).
_Endowments._--The act introduced a new principle into the
administration of endowments by directing that their income so far as
necessarily applicable in any case for those purposes of a public
elementary school for which the local authority are liable must be
paid to that authority for the relief of the parochial rate (S 13). As
the result of technicalities of legal interpretation the section has
been found to have in practice a narrower scope than had been
generally anticipated.
The act of 1902 was extended to London by a separate act in 1903,
containing certain special provisions of only minor importance.
"Passive resistance" to 1902 act. Default Act 1904.
The hostility of Nonconformists to the extension of rate-aid to
denominational schools led to the organization upon a considerable scale
of what became known as the "Passive Resistance" movement, a number of
Nonconformist rate-payers refusing to pay the education rate on the
ground that their consciences forbade their supporting the religious
teaching in denominational schools; and their willingness to become
subject to distraint and consequent inconveniences rather than pay the
rates became the foundation of a widespread political campaign. In
Wales, where in the rural districts the schools were commonly Anglican
whilst the population was Nonconformist, particular difficulties arose
in administering the act in consequence of the hostile attitude of the
county authorities. Friction likewise manifested itself in one or two
English areas, which reflected militant Nonconformist views. Accordingly
the government passed the Local Education (Local Authority Default) Act
1904, empowering the Board of Education, in the case of default by the
local authority, to make payments direct to the managers of the school
and to deduct the amount from the sums payable to the defaulting
authority on account of parliamentary grants.
Bill of 1906.
When the liberal party came into power again in 1906, Mr Birrell as
president of the Board of Education in Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman's
administration introduced a bill to amend the Education Acts 1902-1903,
with the object of securing full public control of all rate-aided
schools and the appointment of teachers without reference to religious
belief. The bill was of a highly complex character; its principal
features were,--compulsory transfer of existing voluntary schools to the
local authority, facilities for the giving of denominational instruction
in transferred schools out of school hours by persons other than the
regular teachers, and the recognition in populous districts, upon the
demand of parents, of special publicly maintained schools in which
denominational teaching could be included in the curriculum; the latter
schools might (according to the bill as finally amended) in the last
resort, i.e. if the local authority refused to maintain them, be
recognized as state-aided schools. The bill encountered strong
opposition from Anglicans and Catholics (though the Catholic Irish
members finally voted for it as amended); it passed the House of Commons
by a large majority, but after unavailing attempts at compromise upon
the amendments introduced in the House of Lords, the two Houses failed
to agree and the measure was lost.
Bills of 1908.
Mr Birrell was soon transferred to another office, and nothing more was
done to amend the act of 1902 till early in the session of 1908, his
successor Mr McKenna introduced a bill based on what was known as
"contracting out." In single-school parishes the existing schools were
to be compulsorily transferred, subject to the grant of denominational
facilities out of school hours; elsewhere a sufficiency of places in
schools with Cowper-Temple teaching, which the bill proposed to make
compulsory in all provided schools, must be supplied by the local
authority, while existing voluntary schools might become state-aided
schools upon terms of receiving a grant of 47s. per head. The bill was
accompanied by a financial scheme for a new system of allocating the
parliamentary grant. In view of the improbability of its passing into
law the bill was not pressed beyond the stage of second reading.
Meanwhile, when Mr Asquith reorganized the cabinet, Mr Runciman
succeeded Mr McKenna at the education office, and in the autumn he
introduced a fresh measure framed as the result of negotiations between
the government and the archbishop of Canterbury (Dr Randall Davidson)
and designed to be passed rapidly through parliament by consent of all
parties. Mr Runciman's bill, like his predecessor's, was based upon the
principle of compulsory transfer in single-school parishes and
contracting out elsewhere, but it gave a right of entry for
denominational teaching on two days a week during school hours in all
council schools whether transferred voluntary schools or otherwise, with
liberty to employ for this purpose assistant teachers, but not (save
temporarily at first in transferred schools) head teachers. Provision
was also made for the payment of a small rent which would be applicable
for or towards the cost of the denominational instruction.
Unfortunately, the compromise failed at the last moment for want of
agreement as to the financial terms of "contracting out," the government
offering 50s. per head and the Church demanding 7s. more. It is obvious
that "contracting out" is open to serious objection upon educational and
economic grounds, and that if resorted to upon any very considerable
scale it would involve a disruption of the public elementary system, and
a duplication of schools which would constitute a wasteful drain upon
the national exchequer. Upon such a system, therefore, some check is
necessary, and, once decided that the check should take the form of
financial pressure, rather than request of parents as in Mr Birrell's
bill, or some form of administrative control, the question of pecuniary
terms became one of principle and not merely of financial detail.
Moreover, the difficulty of adjusting differences was intensified by the
opposition of the extremists on either side, which daily gathered force,
and the bill was withdrawn by the government when in committee of the
House of Commons. The conciliatory efforts of Mr Runciman and Dr Randall
Davidson revealed the existence of a considerable body of influential
opinion among all schools of thought in favour of a national compromise,
and the proposals embodied in the bill marked on the part both of
Churchmen and Nonconformists important concessions to each other's
views, engendering reasonable hopes of an ultimate settlement being
reached at no distant date.
Feeding of school children.
Two subsidiary points as regards educational machinery have to be noted.
The Education (Provision of Meals) Act 1906 enabled local education
authorities to aid voluntary agencies in the provision of meals for
children attending public elementary schools, and in certain cases with
the consent of the Board of Education to defray the cost of the food
themselves. In 1907-1908 forty, and in 1908-1909 seventy-five
authorities in England and Wales were authorized by the board to expend
moneys from the rates on food under this act. In addition, a number of
authorities expended funds on equipment and service.
Medical inspection.
In 1907 an uncontroversial act entitled the Education (Administrative
Provisions) Act, besides dealing with various matters of technical and
administrative detail, laid upon local education authorities the new
duty of providing for the medical inspection of all children attending
public elementary schools. In connexion with this act the Board of
Education established a medical department to advise and assist them in
supervising local education authorities in carrying out their statutory
duties in this regard. The whole departure is significant of the new
sense of the importance of physical culture and hygiene which has been
one of the remarkable features in recent educational developments.
General progress in elementary education.
Sir Joshua Fitch, in his article on education in the 10th edition of
this work, describes how experience had led the Education Department to
abandon the system of payment by results, to establish "in place of
testing the proficiency of individual scholars,... one summary estimate
of the work of the school; in place of an annual examination, occasional
inspection without notice; in place of a variable grant dependent on a
report in detail on the several subjects of instruction and on
particular educational merits and defects, one block grant payable to
all schools alike." He at the same time expressed some misgiving as to
the effect of "so large a relaxation of the conditions by which it had
hitherto been sought to secure accuracy and thoroughness in teaching."
The act of 1902, by placing secular education in public elementary
schools under the control of strongly organized local education
authorities may be said to have largely removed such dangers as were to
be apprehended from the relaxation in question. Thus it was possible for
the Board of Education in the code of 1904 to abolish the last traces of
the system of payment by results, by setting forth (in the language of
their report for 1903-1904) "a properly co-ordinated curriculum suitable
to the needs of the children, with an indication of the relation which
the various subjects of instruction should bear to each other, in place
of the relatively haphazard list of possible branches of knowledge which
were formerly presented to the choice of individual schools or
authorities." In the new code also the board for the first time
endeavoured to state for the guidance of teachers and parents the proper
aim of the public elementary school, laying stress upon that element of
the training of character which the system of payment by results had so
unfortunately obscured. The new spirit was strikingly manifested in the
volume of _Suggestions for the Considerations of Teachers_, issued by
the Board of Education in 1905. This volume represented a notable
attempt to connect administration with educational theory, without in
any way seeking to crush individual initiative, or to impose a
bureaucratic uniformity of method upon those engaged in the actual work
of the schools. Apprehension of the true aim of elementary education as
essentially and primarily a preparation for practical life has led to a
corresponding development of instruction of a practical character,
observation lessons and nature study being treated as a necessary
element in the curriculum, while handicraft and gardening, and domestic
subjects (for girls), are encouraged by special grants. Particular
attention has been bestowed both by the central and local authorities
upon the problem of rural instruction, and much has been done in many
areas to bring the schools into closer relations with the needs of
agricultural and rural life generally. In this way the old and perhaps
not altogether ill-founded distrust of popular education as tending to
unfit the working classes for industrial pursuits is being broken down
and a public opinion more favourable to educational progress in the
widest sense is being created.
According to the official returns for 1907-1908, the total number of
scholars on the registers (England only) was as follows:--council
schools, 2,991,741; voluntary schools, 2,566,030; total, 5,557,771, and
the total attendance upon which grant was paid was 4,928,659. The
percentage of actual average attendance to average number on the
registers was 88.50%. The parliamentary grant (England and Wales) for
elementary schools, other than higher elementary, amounted to
L11,023,433.
Higher elementary schools.
The development of higher elementary education in England is now
proceeding very much upon the lines that have been noted in France. The
old higher-grade board-schools (declared illegal under the Elementary
Education Acts by the judgment in the case of _Rex_ v. _Cockerton_ in
1901, and legalized temporarily by an act passed for the purpose in the
same year) were mostly converted into municipal secondary schools under
the act of 1902. In the succeeding years provision was made in the code
for higher elementary schools of a specialized and technical type
intended only for industrial districts. In 1906, as the result of the
recommendations of the Consultative Committee, a new type of higher
elementary school was admitted for children over twelve, corresponding
generally to the French _ecole primaire superieure_, described as having
"for its object the development of the education given in the ordinary
public elementary school, and the provision of special instruction
bearing on the future occupations of the scholars, whether boys or
girls." It may be possible to supplement this system in the rural areas
to some extent by "higher tops" to the ordinary elementary schools in
cases where it is not practicable to establish a fully organised higher
elementary school; but for such "higher tops" no central grant is
available. The total number of scholars upon the registers of higher
elementary schools (England) in 1907-1908 was: New Type, 3178 (against
2715 in the previous year); Old Type, 4492 (against 5866 in the previous
year).
Expenditure on elementary education.
The total expenditure (exclusive of capital outlay) of the local
authorities (1906-1907) in England only upon elementary education,
including "industrial" and "special" schools, was L19,776,733, of which
(a) L10,408,242 was met by the ordinary parliamentary grant, and (b)
L8,930,468 was the balance required to be met by rates, the difference
being represented by receipts from various sources. The average cost per
child of elementary schools in England and Wales (excluding London) may
be taken at L3 (including London L3, 4s. 10d.), and the average central
grant (excluding grants for special purposes) at 41s., leaving 19s. to
be raised locally.
Preliminary training of elementary teachers.
The training of teachers for the two great branches of public education,
elementary and secondary respectively, is an important part of the
general administrative problem. Since the middle of the 19th century
there has been a great development of public opinion with regard to
their professional qualifications. Sir Joshua Fitch (_Ency. Brit._ 10th
ed.) pointed out that the full appreciation of the importance of
training began at the lower end of the social scale. Shuttleworth and
Tufnell in 1846 urged the necessity of special training for the primary
teacher, and hoped to establish State Training Colleges to supply this
want; but the one college at Battersea which was founded as an
experiment was soon transferred to the National Society (the "National
Society for educating the poor in the principles of the Established
Church": founded in 1811). Before this, Bell and Lancaster had made
arrangements in their model schools for the reception of a few young
people to learn the system by practice. In Glasgow, David Stow, who
founded in 1826 the Normal Seminary which afterwards became the Free
Church College, was one of the first to insist on the need of systematic
professional preparation. The religious bodies in England, notably the
Established Church, availed themselves promptly of the failure of the
central government, and a number of diocesan colleges for men, and
separately for women, were gradually established. In 1854 the British
and Foreign School Society (founded 1808) placed their institutes at the
Borough Road and Stockwell on a collegiate footing, and subsequently
founded other colleges at Swansea, Bangor, Darlington and Saffron
Walden; the Roman Catholic Church provided two for women and one for
men; and the Wesleyans two, one for each sex. The new provincial
colleges of university rank were invited by the Education Department to
attach normal classes to their ordinary course and to make provision for
special training and suitable practice in schools for those students who
desired to become teachers. Thus the government came to recognize two
kinds of training schools--the residential colleges of the old type and
the day colleges attached to institutions of university rank; both were
subsidized by grants from the Treasury, and regularly inspected. As the
need of special training for teachers became further recognized by the
consideration of the same question as regards teachers in higher and
intermediate schools (Cambridge instituting in 1879 examinations for a
teacher's diploma, and other universities providing courses for
secondary as well as primary teachers, and establishing professorships
of education), the attitude of the government, i.e. the Board of
Education, towards the problem gradually became more and more a subject
of controversy and of public interest, as indicated by the clause in the
Act of 1899 providing for a public registration of qualified teachers
and for the gradual elimination from the profession of those who were
unqualified. And meanwhile the increased solidarity of the National
Union of Teachers (founded in 1870), the trade union, so to speak, of
the teachers, brought an important body of professional opinion to bear
on the discussion of their own interests.
The question of the preliminary education of elementary teachers had
after some years of discussion reached a critical stage in 1909. The
history of pupil teachership as a method of concurrent instruction and
employment shows that it was in its inception something in the nature of
a makeshift; the ideal placed before local education authorities in the
recent regulations and reports of the Board of Education is the
alternative system whereby with the aid of national bursaries
(instituted in 1907) "the general education of future teachers may be
continued in secondary schools until the age of seventeen or eighteen,
and all attempts to obtain a practical experience of elementary school
work may be deferred until the training college is entered, or at least
until an examination making a natural break in that general education
and qualifying for an admission to a training college has been passed."
Under the revised pupil-teacher system established by the regulations of
1903 provision is made for the instruction of pupil teachers in centres
which as far as possible are attached to secondary schools receiving
grants from the Board of Education under the regulations for secondary
schools, about two-thirds of the secondary schools on the grant list
undertaking this work. Accordingly, the result of recent changes is to
modify the old system in two ways: first by providing the alternative of
a full course of secondary education, secondly by associating pupil
teachership itself as far as possible with part-time attendance at a
secondary school. The total number of pupil teachers recognized during
the year 1907-1908 was 20,571, and of these 9770 were in centres forming
integral parts of secondary schools. The number of bursars who passed
the leaving examination was 1486.
Training colleges.
One of the principal difficulties which confronted the state and the
local authorities in their task of organizing an improved system of
public education under the act of 1902 lay in the deficiency of training
colleges in view of the increased number of teachers. Local authorities
naturally hesitated to burden themselves with the cost of providing such
institutions in view of the fact that there is nothing to prevent
teachers trained at great expense by one authority taking service under
a less public-spirited authority who had contributed nothing to such
training; hence a widespread feeling that the provision of training
colleges should be undertaken by the state as a matter of national
concern. Under these circumstances a new system of building grants in
aid of the establishment of training colleges was instituted in 1905. In
1906 these grants were raised from 25 to 75% of the capital expenditure,
but were limited to colleges provided by local authorities. A further
difficulty in view of the municipalization of education arose from the
fact that the majority of the residential colleges were in the hands of
denominational trusts which did not admit a conscience clause. Under the
presidency of Mr McKenna in 1907, the Board of Education, in regulations
which excited much controversy, "with a view to throwing open as far as
possible the advantages of a course of training in colleges supported
mainly by public funds to all students who are qualified to profit by it
irrespective of religious creed or social status," laid down that the
application of a candidate might in no circumstances be rejected on any
religious ground, nor on the ground of social antecedents or the like.
The same regulations provided that no new training colleges would be
recognized except on terms of compliance with certain conditions as to
freedom from denominational restrictions or requirements. The obligation
as to religious exemptions has since been limited to 50% of the
admissions. There were in attendance (_Statistics_, England, 1907-1908)
in the various colleges, 6561 women and 2835 men, of whom 1619 women and
335 men were in colleges provided by local education authorities. The
grants made by the Board of Education for training colleges were as
follows: maintenance grants L383,851; building grants L45,000. These
figures include Wales.
Continuative education.
The fear has been widely entertained that a considerable part of the
national expenditure upon elementary education is wasted for want of an
effective system of continuative instruction to be given out of working
hours to adolescents engaged in industrial employment. The whole subject
was exhaustively treated by the report in 1909 of the Consultative
Committee of the Board of Education. This report seeks to base an
efficient continuative system upon the improvement of elementary
education by reducing the size of the classes in the elementary schools
upon the lines now laid down by the new staffing regulations of 1909; by
increasing the amount of instruction in hand-work with a view to
rendering the curriculum less bookish and more efficient as a training
for industrial and agricultural life; and by legislation to reform the
system of half-time attendance and raise the age of compulsory
attendance to thirteen and ultimately fourteen. Upon the foundation of
an improved and prolonged elementary education there would be reared a
superstructure of continuative schools or classes, attendance at which
up to seventeen would be compulsory under bye-laws adoptive locally at
the option of the local education authorities. In 1906-1907 about 21 per
thousand of the population of England and Wales attended evening schools
and classes inspected by the Board of Education, and grant amounting to
L361,596 was paid in respect of 440,718 regular attendants.
Secondary education.
The most marked progress has undoubtedly been in secondary education,
and in no direction has the act of 1902 proved more fruitful. At the end
of the 19th century secondary instruction in England was still provided
chiefly by endowed grammar-schools, by proprietary schools established
by religious bodies or joint-stock companies, and by private enterprise.
No public provision was made for secondary education as such; what
financial assistance was forthcoming from municipal sources was given
indirectly under cover of the grants under the Technical Instruction
Acts, while in the administration of central grants for the first years
of the working of the Board of Education Act 1899, no absolute
differentiation between secondary and technological functions was
recognized. The establishment of local authorities with direct duties in
respect of secondary education, and the reorganization of the central
office with reference to the three branches of education, elementary,
secondary and technological, rendered possible for the first time an
adequate treatment of the problem of public secondary education as a
whole. "The regulations for secondary schools," says the prefatory
memorandum to the regulations of the Board of Education, "grew up round
the old provisions of the Directory of the Science and Art Department.
Detached science classes were gradually built up into schools of
science. Schools of science were subsequently widened into schools of
what was known as the 'Division A' type, providing a course of
instruction in science in connexion with, and as part of, a course of
general education. Aid was afterwards extended to schools of the
'Division B' type in which science did not form the preponderating
element of the instruction given. In 1904 the board recast the
regulations so as to bring all schools aided by grants within the
general definition of a school offering a general education up to and
beyond the age of sixteen through a complete graded course of
instruction, the object of which should be to develop all the faculties,
and to form the habit of exercising them."
Two main tendencies distinguish the recent development: on the one hand
the tendency to municipalization, or at least to the establishment of
public control; on the other hand the tendency (marked especially by the
regulations of 1907) to greater elasticity in regard to curricula, and
so to the freer encouragement of local initiative and local effort.
In 1907 the government of Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman placed greatly
increased funds at the disposal of the Board of Education for the
purpose of secondary education. The regulations under which the
increased grant was administered imposed conditions in respect of
freedom from denominational restrictions or requirements, representative
local control, and accessibility to all classes of the people, which,
like the analogous rules with regard to training colleges, roused
considerable controversy. With regard to religious instruction, the
requirement was made that no catechism or formulary distinctive of any
particular religious denomination might be taught in the school except
upon the request in writing of the parent or guardian and at the cost of
funds other than grants of public money. Power was at the same time
reserved to the board to waive the new conditions in the event of the
local education authority passing a resolution that the school was in
their view required as part of the secondary school provision for their
area, and that the conditions, or one or more of them, might be waived
with advantage in view of the educational needs of the area. It will be
noticed that one effect of the regulations (as of the training college
regulations) was to recognize as a kind of established religion those
elements of Christianity which are shared in common by the various
Protestant churches, according to the system of Lancaster and the
Cowper-Temple compromise. Normally schools are required to provide 25%
of free places for scholars from public elementary schools, and, with a
view to encouraging the transference of children from the public
elementary school at an early age, a grant of L2 was made payable on
account of ex-public elementary scholars between ten and twelve years of
age. The full scale of grants is L2 for ex-public elementary scholars
between ten and twelve, and L5 for scholars between twelve and eighteen.
To schools previously recognized and failing to comply with the new
conditions, grant may be paid on the lower scale of L2 and L2, 10s.
respectively.
Secondary school grants are assessed upon average attendance, and
efficiency is guaranteed by inspection and not by individual
examination. All recognized schools must provide at least the
substantial equivalent of the four-years' course formerly required, and
recognition is withheld or withdrawn if an adequate number of the
scholars do not remain at least four years in the school, or do not
remain up to sixteen; in rural areas, however, and small towns, a school
life of three years and a leaving age of fifteen may be accepted. "The
board are now in a position, through their inspectorate, to keep a watch
and exercise a guidance which were previously impossible over the
planning and working of school curricula. Detailed reports following
upon full inspections, and the more constant if less obvious influence
exercised through informal visits, conferences, reports and suggestions,
may now be relied upon to guard against the risks of one-sided
education, of ill-balanced schemes of instruction, and of premature or
excessive specialization" (Report of Board of Education, 1906-1907, page
68). The curriculum must provide instruction duly graded and duly
continuous, in the English language and literature, in geography and
history, in mathematics, science and drawing, and in at least one
language other than English. Where two languages other than English are
taken, Latin must ordinarily be one. Provision must be made for
organized games, physical exercises and manual instruction, and in
girls' schools science and mathematics other than arithmetic may be
replaced by an approved scheme of practical housewifery for girls over
fifteen. The total number of secondary schools recognized for grant
(_Statistics_, 1907-1908) was 736, of which only 220 were directly
provided by local authorities. The number of pupils in attendance was
68,104 boys and 56,359 girls, total 124,463. The government grants for
1907-1908 amounted to L320,873 besides grants from local authorities.
_Wales._
Notwithstanding the important differences which exist between the social
and especially the religious conditions of England and Wales
respectively, Wales continued to be treated as one with England for
purposes of educational administration down to quite recent years.
Towards the end of the 19th century the striking revival of Welsh
nationality, in itself largely an educational and a literary movement,
led to a spontaneous demand among the Welsh people for the organization
of a national system of higher education. In accordance with the
recommendations of a special royal commission the Welsh Intermediate
Education Act passed in 1889 provided for the creation in every county
in Wales (including Monmouthshire) of joint education committees
consisting of three nominees of the county council and two nominees of
the lord president of the council. To these committees were entrusted
the duties of framing (under the Charity Commissioners) schemes for the
establishment of intermediate and technical schools and for the
application of endowments, and for administering a 1/2d. county rate,
which was supplemented by a treasury grant not exceeding the amount
raised by the rate. Certain supervisory functions were entrusted to a
Central Education Board, to which are committed the duties of inspection
and examination. The joint education committees have now (except for the
purpose of framing schemes for endowments) been superseded by the local
education authorities under the act of 1902. The public assistance
afforded to secondary education in Wales under the Intermediate Act is
supplemented by the grants of the Board of Education, and the Board's
revised Secondary School Regulations were applied to Wales in 1908.
There were (1907-1908) 92 county secondary schools in Wales administered
under schemes made under the Welsh Intermediate Act, attended by 6235
boys and 6727 girls, total 12,962; and 12 other secondary schools, of
which 8 were provided by local authorities. The total attendance at all
secondary schools was 13,615, viz. 6819 boys and 6796 girls. The Board
of Education grant amounted to L31,090. The expenditure of the local
authorities for the year 1906-1907 was L85,242.
The number of scholars on the registers of ordinary public elementary
schools in Wales was (_Statistics_, 1907-1908), in council schools
330,413, and in voluntary schools 100,290, total 430,703. The percentage
of average attendance was 86.98. The ordinary parliamentary grant
(1906-1907) was L794,161, and the net expenditure of local authorities
L561,234.
In 1907 a Welsh department of the Board of Education was established
with a permanent secretary and a chief inspector, each responsible
directly to the president. A movement was in progress in Wales in
1908-1909 for the creation of a national council of education under an
independent minister, but this change could in any case only be effected
by legislation; and meanwhile the special religious and social
conditions in Wales caused administrative difficulties in working an act
(that of 1902) primarily designed to meet those prevailing in England.
(G. B. M. C.)
_United States._
Beginnings.
_History._--The first white settlers who came to North America were
typical representatives of those European peoples who had made more
progress in civilization than any other in the world. Those settlers, in
particular those from England and from Holland, brought with them the
most advanced ideas of the time on the subject of education. The
conditions of life in the New World emphasized the need of schools and
colleges, and among the earliest public acts of the settlers were
provisions to establish them. The steps taken between 1619 and 1622 to
provide schools for the colony of Virginia were frustrated by the Indian
war which broke out in the latter year, and were never successfully
renewed during the colonial period. In New York, where the influence of
the Dutch was at first predominant, elementary schools were maintained
at the public expense, and were intended for the education of all
classes of the population. This policy reflected the very advanced views
as to public elementary education which were then held in the
Netherlands. The assumption of control in the colony of New York by the
English was a distinct check to the development of public elementary
education, and little or no further progress was made until after the
Revolution. The most systematic educational policy was pursued in the
colony of Massachusetts. As early as 1635, five years after it was
founded, the town of Boston took action to the end that "our brother
Philemon Pormort shall be entreated to become schoolmaster for the
teaching and nurturing children with us." The General Court of the
colony in 1636 made the first appropriation for what was to become
Harvard College, taking its name in honour of the minister, John
Harvard, who died in 1638, leaving his library and one-half of his
property, having a value of L800, to the new institution. The amount of
this appropriation of 1636 (L400) was remarkable in that it was probably
equal to the whole colony tax for a year. In 1642 followed a legislative
act which, while saying nothing of schools, gave to the selectmen in
every town power to oversee both the education and the employment of
children. It is made the duty of the selectmen to see that the children
can read and understand the principles of religion and the capital laws
of the country, and that they are put to some useful work.
Five years later, in 1647, was enacted the law which is not only the
real foundation of the Massachusetts school system, but the type of
later legislation throughout the United States. This epoch-making act,
the first of its kind in the world, represented the public opinion of a
colony of about 20,000 persons, living in thirty towns. It required
every town of fifty house-holders to establish a school, the master of
which should be paid either by the parents of the children taught or by
public tax, as the majority of the town committee might decide; and it
further required every town of one hundred families or house-holders to
set up a grammar school in which pupils might be prepared for the
"University," as the new institution at Cambridge was designated.
Moreover, a penalty was attached to neglect of this legislative
requirement, in the form of a fine to be devoted to the maintenance of
the nearest school. Horace Mann said of the act of 1647: "It is
impossible for us adequately to conceive the boldness of the measure,
which aimed at universal education through the establishment of free
schools. As a fact it had no precedent in the world's history; and, as a
theory, it could have been refuted and silenced by a more formidable
array of argument and experience than was ever marshalled against any
other institution of human origin. But time has ratified its soundness.
Two centuries of successful operation now proclaim it to be as wise as
it was courageous, and as beneficent as it was disinterested." The
significance of these acts of 1642 and 1647 is that they foreshadow the
whole American system of education, including elementary schools,
secondary schools and colleges, and that they indicate the principles
upon which that system rests. These principles as summarized by George
H. Martin in his _Evolution of the Massachusetts Public School System_
are the following:--(1) The universal education of youth is essential to
the well-being of the state. (2) The obligation to furnish this
education rests primarily upon the parent. (3) The state has a right to
enforce this obligation. (4) The state may fix a standard which shall
determine the kind of education and the minimum amount. (5) Public money
raised by general tax may be used to provide such education as the state
requires. The tax may be general, though the school attendance is not.
(6) Education higher than the rudiments may be supplied by the state.
Opportunity must be provided at the public expense for youths who wish
to be fitted for college. These principles have now found expression in
the public acts of every state, and upon them education in the United
States is founded.
Development.
Despite the praiseworthy attempts made in New York, New Jersey and
Pennsylvania to develop schools and school systems, very little was
accomplished in those colonies which was permanent. The sentiment in the
more southern colonies was, as a rule, unfriendly to free schools, and
nothing of importance was attempted in that section of the country until
the time of Thomas Jefferson. Through religious zeal or philanthropy
colleges were founded as far south as Virginia, and no fewer than ten of
these institutions were in operation in 1776. Their present names and
the dates of their foundation are: Harvard University, Massachusetts
(1636); College of William and Mary, Virginia (1693); Yale University,
Connecticut (1701); Princeton University, New Jersey (1746); Washington
and Lee University, Virginia (1749); University of Pennsylvania,
Pennsylvania (1749); Columbia University, New York (1754); Brown
University, Rhode Island (1764); Rutgers College, New Jersey (1766); and
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire (1769). In the colleges the
ecclesiastical spirit was at first almost uniformly dominant. The
greater number of their students were preparing for the ministry in some
one of the branches of the Protestant Church. These facts caused the
grammar schools to take on more and more the character of
college-preparatory schools; and when this was brought about they
supplied the educational needs of but one portion of the community. As
time passed, the interdependence of governmental and ecclesiastical
interests began to weaken in the colonies, and there arose among those
who represented the new secularizing tendency a distrust of the colleges
and their influence. This gave rise to a new and influential type of
school, the academy, which took its name from the secondary schools
established in England by the dissenting religious bodies during the
latter part of the seventeenth century at the suggestion of Milton.
These academies were intended to give an education which was thought to
be more practical than that offered by the colleges, and they drew their
students from the so-called middle classes of society. The older
academies were usually endowed institutions, organized under the control
of religious organizations or of self-perpetuating boards of trustees.
Their programme of studies was less restricted than that of the grammar
schools, and they gave new emphasis to the study of the English language
and its literature, of mathematics and of the new sciences of nature.
For two generations the academies were a most beneficent factor in
American education, and they supplied a large number of the
better-prepared teachers for work in other schools. These schools were
in a sense public in that they were chartered, but they were not
directly under public control in their management. Early in the 19th
century there arose a well-defined demand for public secondary
schools--high schools, as they are popularly known. They were the direct
outgrowth of the elementary school system. Boston, Philadelphia,
Baltimore and New York were the first of the large cities to establish
schools of this type, and they spread rapidly. These public secondary
schools met with opposition, however, springing partly from the friends
of the academies, and partly from those who held that governmental
agency should be restricted to the field of elementary education. The
legal questions raised were settled by a decision of the supreme court
of Michigan, which contained these words: "Neither in our state policy,
in our constitution, nor in our laws do we find the primary school
districts restricted in the branches of knowledge which their officers
may cause to be taught, or the grade of instruction that may be given,
if their voters consent, in regular form, to bear the expense and raise
the taxes for the purpose." This decision gave marked impetus to the
development of public secondary or high schools, and they have increased
rapidly in number. The academies have relatively declined, and in the
Western states are almost unknown.
Meanwhile the elementary school system had grown rapidly. The school
district, the smallest civil division, was created in Connecticut in
1701, in Rhode Island about 1750, and in Massachusetts in 1789. From the
point of view of efficient, well-supported schools, it has been felt
since the time of Horace Mann that the substitution of the small school
district for the town as the unit of school administration was a
mistake. Yet the school district has exercised a profound influence for
good upon the American people. In New York state, for example, there
were in 1900 over eleven thousand school districts, and in Illinois over
twelve thousand. The districts are small in extent and often sparsely
settled. Their government is as democratic as possible. The resident
legal voters, often including women, hold a meeting at least once a
year. They elect trustees to represent them in the employment of the
teacher and the management of the school. They determine whether a new
schoolhouse shall be built, whether repairs shall be made, and what sum
of money shall be raised for school purposes. In the rural districts
this system has often been itself a school in patriotism and in the
conduct of public affairs. Recently the tendency is to merge the school
districts into the township, in order that larger and better schools may
be maintained, and that educational advantages may be distributed more
evenly among the people. Most of the southern states have the county
system of school administration. This is because the county, rather than
the township, has been the political unit in the south from the
beginning. Special laws have been made for the school system in cities,
and the form of these laws differs very much. In nearly every city there
is a separate board of education, sometimes chosen by the voters,
sometimes appointed by the mayor or other official, which board has
full control of the schools. The city board of education has as its
executive officer a superintendent of schools, who has become a most
important factor in American educational administration. He exerts great
influence in the selection of teachers, in the choice of text-books, in
the arrangement of the programme of studies, and in the determination of
questions of policy. Sometimes he is charged by law with the initiative
in some or all of these matters. He is usually a trained administrator
as well as an experienced teacher. The first superintendent was
appointed in 1837 at Buffalo. Providence followed in 1839, New Orleans
in 1841, Cleveland in 1844, Baltimore in 1849, Cincinnati in 1850,
Boston in 1851, New York, San Francisco and Jersey City in 1852, Newark
and Brooklyn in 1853, Chicago and St Louis in 1854, and Philadelphia in
1883. In general, it may be said that the progress of public education
in the United States is marked by (1) compulsory schools, (2) compulsory
licensing of teachers, (3) compulsory school attendance, and (4)
compulsory school supervision, and by the increasingly efficient
administration of these provisions. The compulsion comes in each case
from the state government, which alone, in the American system, has the
power to prescribe it and to enforce it. Each state is therefore an
independent educational unit, and there is no single, uniform American
system of education in any legal sense. In fact, however, the great mass
of the American people are in entire agreement as to the principles
which should control public education; and the points in which the
policies of the several states are in agreement are greater, both in
number and in importance, than those in which they differ. An American
educational system exists, therefore, in spirit and in substance, even
though not in form.
National policy.
Neither in the Declaration of Independence nor in the Constitution of
the United States is there any mention of education. The founders of the
nation were by no means indifferent to education, but they shared the
common view of their time, which was that the real responsibility for
the maintenance of schools and the expense of maintaining them should
fall upon the several local communities. The relation of government to
education was not then a subject of ordinary consideration or
discussion. Later, when this question did arise and the power of
taxation was involved, the several states assumed control of education,
as it was necessary that they should do. Nevertheless, from the very
beginning the national government has aided and supported education,
while not controlling it. This policy dates from the 13th of July 1787,
when there was passed the famous "Ordinance for the Government of the
Territory of the United States North-West of the River Ohio," meaning
the territory north and west of the Ohio river now represented by the
states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and the eastern
side of Minnesota, embracing more than 265,000 sq. m. of territory. This
ordinance contains this declaration: "Religion, morality, and knowledge
being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools
and the means of education shall for ever be encouraged." The Ordinance
of 1787 also reaffirmed the provisions of the so-called Land Ordinance
of 1785, by which section No. 16 in every township (a township consists
of 36 numbered sections of 1 sq. m. each), or one thirty-sixth of the
entire north-west territory, was set aside for the maintenance of public
schools within the township. The funds derived from the sale and lease
of these original "school lands" form the major portion of the public
school endowment of the states formed out of the north-west territory.
The precedent thus established became the policy of the nation. Each
state admitted prior to 1848 reserved section No. 16 in every township
of public land for common schools. Each state admitted since 1848 (Utah
being an exception, and having four sections) has reserved sections No.
16 and No. 36 in every township of public lands for this purpose. In
addition, the national government has granted two townships in every
state and territory containing public lands for seminaries or
universities. A third land grant is that made in 1862 for colleges of
agriculture and the mechanical arts. The sum total of these three land
grants amounted in 1900 to 78,659,439 acres, to which there must be
added various special grants made from time to time to the states and
devoted to education. The portion of the public domain so set apart in
1900 amounted in all to 86,138,473 acres, or 134,591 English sq. m. This
is an area greater than those of the six New England states, New York,
New Jersey, Maryland and Delaware added together. It is a portion of the
earth's surface as great as the kingdom of Prussia, about seven-tenths
as great as France, and considerably greater than the combined areas of
Great Britain (including the Channel Islands) and the kingdom of
Holland. Besides the enormous grants of land in aid of education, the
national government has maintained since 1802 a military academy at West
Point, New York, for the training of officers for the army, and since
1845 a naval academy at Annapolis, Maryland, for the training of
officers for the navy. It has also taken charge of the education of the
children of uncivilized Indians, and of all children in Alaska. It has
voted, by act of 1887, a perpetual endowment of $15,000 a year for each
agricultural experiment station connected with a state agricultural
college, and, by act of 1890, an additional endowment of $25,000 a year
for each of the agricultural colleges themselves. The aggregate value of
land and money given by the national government for education in the
several states and territories is about $300,000,000.
Bureau of education.
In 1867 the Congress established a bureau of education, presided over by
a commissioner who is under the jurisdiction of the secretary of the
interior, the purpose of which is declared to be to collect "such
statistics and facts as shall show the condition and progress of
education in the several states and territories, and of diffusing such
information respecting the organization and management of school systems
and methods of teaching as shall aid the people of the United States in
the establishment and maintenance of efficient school systems, and
otherwise promote the cause of education throughout the country." The
bureau has therefore no direct power over the educational policy of the
several states. It has, however, exercised a potent influence for good
in its advisory capacity. Up to 1900 this bureau had published 360
separate volumes and pamphlets, including 31 annual reports, covering
from 800 to 2300 pages each; and the number has since been much
increased. The annual reports alone of the Commissioner of Education are
mines of information. These standard works of reference are distributed
gratuitously in large numbers to libraries, school officials and other
persons interested, and to foreign governments. The several
commissioners of education have been: Henry Barnard, 1867-1870; John
Eaton, 1870-1886; Nathaniel H.R. Dawson, 1886-1889; William T.
Harris,[3] 1889-1906; Elmer Ellsworth Brown, 1906- .
State governments and education.
In the United States the sovereign powers are not all lodged in one
place. Such of those powers as are not granted by the Constitution to
the national government are reserved to the states respectively, or to
the people. The power to levy taxes for the support of public education
has been almost universally held to be one of the powers so reserved.
The inhabitants of the several local communities, however indisposed
they may have been to relinquish absolute control of their own schools,
have been compelled to yield to the authority of the state government
whenever it has been asserted, for except under such authority no civil
division--county, city, township, or school district--possesses the
power to levy taxes for school purposes. Moreover, since the exercise of
state authority has uniformly improved the quality of the schools, it
has usually been welcomed, not resisted. In general, it may be said that
the state has used its authority to prescribe a minimum of efficiency
which schools and teachers must reach, and it enforces this minimum
through inspection and the withholding of its proper share of the state
school fund from any locality where schools or teachers are permitted to
fall below the required standard. In extreme cases the state authorities
have interfered directly to prevent the evil results of local
inefficiency or contumacy. In addition, the states, almost without
exception, maintain at their own expense schools for the training of
teachers, known as normal schools. Many of the states also offer
inducements to the cities, towns and districts to exceed the prescribed
minimum of efficiency. Through the steady exercise of state supervision
the school buildings have improved, the standard for entrance upon the
work of teaching has been raised, the programme of studies has been made
more effective and more uniform, and the length of the school term has
increased. The Constitution of every state now contains some provision
as to public education. Each state has an executive officer charged with
the enforcement of the state school laws. Sometimes, as in New York,
this official has plenary powers; sometimes, as in Massachusetts and
Ohio, he is little more than an adviser. In twenty-nine states this
official is known as the superintendent of public instruction; in
Massachusetts and Connecticut he is called secretary of the state board
of education; other titles used are commissioner of public schools,
superintendent of common schools, and superintendent of public schools.
The schools are administered, on behalf of the taxpayers, by an elected
board of school trustees in rural school districts, and by an elected
(though sometimes appointed) board of education or school committee in
cities and towns. In 836 cities and towns there is a local
superintendent of schools, who directs and supervises the educational
work and acts as the executive officer of the board of education. The
schools in the rural districts are under the direct supervision of a
county superintendent of schools or similar official, who is often
chosen by the people, but who sometimes is named by the state
authorities. The county and city superintendents are often charged with
the duty of holding examinations for entrance upon the work of teaching,
and of issuing licences to those persons who pass the examinations. This
system works best where it is carefully regulated by state law. Thirty
states, one territory, and the District of Columbia have enacted
compulsory education laws, but the enforcement of them is usually very
lax. In fifteen states and territories there are no compulsory education
laws, although there are in existence there fully organized school
systems free to all children. The usual age during which school
attendance is required is from 8 to 14. Provision is made in Maine, New
Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New
Jersey, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Minnesota and Michigan, for sending
habitual truants to some special institution. Laws forbidding the
employment of children under a specified minimum age in any mercantile
or manufacturing establishment are in force in twelve states, and are
usually administered in connexion with the compulsory education laws.
The universal establishment in America of public secondary schools (high
schools), and the existence of state universities in all of the states
south and west of Pennsylvania, have brought into existence a system of
state education which reaches from the kindergarten and the elementary
school to the graduate instruction offered at state colleges and
universities. This system includes (1) about 1500 free public
kindergartens scattered over fifteen states; (2) free public elementary
schools within reach of almost every home in the land; (3) free public
secondary schools (high schools) in every considerable city or town and
in not a few rural communities; (4) free land grant colleges, supported
in large part by the proceeds of the nation's endowment of public lands,
paying particular attention to agriculture and the mechanical arts, in
all the states; (5) state universities, free or substantially so, in all
the states south and west of Pennsylvania; (6) free public normal
schools, for the professional training of teachers, in nearly every
state; (7) free schools for the education of defectives in nearly all
the states; and (8) the national academies at West Point and Annapolis
for the professional training of military and naval officers
respectively.
Kindergartens.
Miss Susan E. Blow, herself the leading exponent of kindergarten
principles in the United States, has pointed out that the history of the
kindergarten movement reveals four distinct stages in its development:
the pioneer stage, having Boston as its centre; the philanthropic stage,
which began in the village of Florence, Mass., and reached its climax at
San Francisco, California; the national or strictly educational stage,
which began at St Louis; and the so-called maternal stage, which from
Chicago as a centre is spreading over the entire country. During the
first stage public attention was directed to a few of the most important
aspects of Froebel's teaching. During the second stage the kindergarten
was valued largely as a reformatory and redemptive influence. During the
third stage the fundamental principles underlying kindergarten training
were scientifically studied and expounded, and the kindergarten became
part of the public school system of the country. The fourth stage,
which, like the third, is fortunately still in existence, aims at making
the kindergarten a link between the school and the home, and so to use
it to strengthen the foundations and elevate the ideals of family life.
By 1898 there were 4363 kindergartens in the United States (1365 of
which were public), employing 9937 teachers (2532 in the public
kindergartens) and enrolling 189,604 children (95,867 in the public
kindergartens). Of the 164 public normal schools, 36 made provision for
training kindergarten teachers. The scientific and literary activity of
some of the private kindergarten training classes is very great, and
they exert a beneficial and stimulating effect on teaching in the
elementary schools. It is generally admitted that from the point of view
of the children, of the teachers, of the schools, and of the community
at large, the kindergarten has been and is an inspiration of
incalculable value.
Elementary schools.
The elementary school course is from six to nine years in length, the
ordinary period being eight years. The pupils enter at about six years
of age. In the cities the elementary schools are usually in session for
five hours daily, except Saturday and Sunday, beginning at 9 A.M. There
is an intermission, usually of an hour, at midday, and short recesses
during the sessions. In the small rural schools the pupils are usually
ungraded, and are taught singly or in varying groups. In the cities and
towns there is a careful gradation of pupils, and promotions from grade
to grade are made at intervals of a year or of a half-year. The best
schools have the most elastic system of gradation and the most frequent
promotions. In a number of states there are laws authorizing the
conveyance of children to school at the public expense, when the
schoolhouse is unduly distant from the homes of a portion of the school
population. Co-education (q.v.) in the elementary school has been the
salutary and almost uniform practice in the United States. The programme
of studies in the elementary school includes English (reading, writing,
spelling, grammar, composition), arithmetic (sometimes elementary
algebra also, or plane geometry in the upper grades), geography, history
of the United States, and elementary natural science, including human
physiology and hygiene. Physical training, vocal music, drawing and
manual training are often taught. Sometimes a foreign language (Latin,
German or French) and the study of general history are begun. Formal
instruction in manners and morals is not often found, but the discipline
of the school offers the best possible training in the habits of
truthfulness, honesty, obedience, regularity, punctuality and conformity
to order. Religious teaching is not permitted, although the exercises of
the day are often opened with reading from the Bible, the repetition of
the Lord's Prayer and the singing of a hymn. Corporal punishment is not
infrequent, but is forbidden by law in New Jersey, and in many states
may be used only under restrictions. Text-books are used as the basis of
the instruction given, and the pupils "recite" in class to the teacher,
who, by use of illustration and comment, makes clear the subject-matter
of the prescribed lesson. The purpose of the recitation method is to
make the work of each pupil help that of his companion. Skilfully used,
it is the most effectual instrument yet devised for elementary school
instruction.
Secondary schools.
The secondary school course is normally four years in length. The
principal subjects studied are Latin, Greek, French, German, algebra,
geometry, physics, chemistry, physical geography, physiology, rhetoric,
English literature, civics and history. Although but 11.36% of the
students in public high schools and 25.36% of those in private secondary
schools are preparing for a college or scientific school, yet the
conditions prescribed by the colleges for admission to their courses
affect powerfully both the secondary school programme and the methods of
teaching. Of late years no educational topic has been more widely
discussed than that as to the proper relations of secondary schools and
colleges. As a result, special examinations for admission to college are
either greatly simplified or entirely abolished, and the secondary
studies are much more substantial and better taught than formerly. An
increasing proportion of secondary school teachers are college
graduates. The most extraordinary characteristic of secondary education
in recent years is the rapid increase in the number of students taking
Latin as a school subject. Meanwhile the proportion of those studying
physics and chemistry has fallen off slightly. The rate of increase in
the number of pupils who study Latin is fully twice as great as the rate
of increase in the number of secondary school students. Between 1890 and
1896, while the number of students in private secondary schools
increased 12%, the number of students in public secondary schools
increased 87%. Since 1894 the number of students in private secondary
schools has steadily declined.
The colleges.
The American college, although it is the outgrowth of the English
colleges of Oxford and of Cambridge, has developed into an institution
which has no counterpart in Europe. The college course of study, at
first three years in length, was soon extended to four years, and the
classes are uniformly known as the freshman, the sophomore, the junior
and the senior. The traditional degree which crowns the college course
is that of Bachelor of Arts (A.B.). The studies ordinarily insisted on
in the case of candidates for this degree are Latin, Greek, mathematics,
English, philosophy, political economy, history, at least one modern
European language (French or German), and at least one natural science.
The degrees of Bachelor of Science (B.S.), Bachelor of Philosophy
(Ph.B.), and Bachelor of Letters (B.L.) are often conferred by colleges
upon students who have pursued systematic courses of study which do not
include Greek or the amount of Latin required for the degree of Bachelor
of Arts. The best colleges give instruction which is similar in
character to that given in Germany in the three upper classes of the
gymnasium and in the introductory courses at the universities, in France
in the two upper classes of the lycee and in the first two years of
university study, and in England in the upper form of the public schools
and during the years of undergraduate residence at Oxford and Cambridge.
Since 1870 the colleges have developed enormously. Their resources have
multiplied, the number of their students has increased by leaps and
bounds, the programme of studies has broadened and deepened, the
standards have been raised, and the efficiency of the instruction has
greatly increased. Rigidly prescribed courses of study have given way to
elective courses, and a knowledge of Greek is no longer required for the
degree of A.B. at such influential colleges as Harvard, Columbia,
Cornell and Williams. A strong effort is being made to have the leading
colleges give but one degree, that of Bachelor of Arts, and to confer
that upon those who complete any substantial course of college studies.
A marked change has taken place in the attitude of the college
authorities toward the students. In 1870 the college president was a
paterfamilias. He knew each student and came into direct personal
contact with him. The president and the faculty had supervision not only
of the studies of the students, but of their moral and religious life as
well. The older type of college professor was not always a great
scholar, but he was a student of human nature, with keen intuitions and
shrewd insight. The new type, which had come into existence at the
opening of the 20th century, was more scholarly in some special
direction, often regarded teaching as a check upon opportunities for
investigation, and disdained troubling himself with a student's personal
concerns or intellectual and moral difficulties. The change was not
altogether for the better, and a desirable reaction has been
observable. Each college, however small or ill-equipped, exercises a
helpful local influence. Ninety per cent of all college students attend
an institution not more than one hundred miles from their own homes. Few
colleges have a national constituency, and even in these cases an
overwhelming preponderance of the students come from the immediate
neighbourhood. This explains, in a measure, the powerful influence which
the college has exercised in the life of the nation. While hardly more
than one in a hundred of the white male youth of the country has had a
college education, yet the college graduates have furnished one-half of
all the presidents of the United States, most of the justices of the
Supreme Court, about one-half of the cabinet officers and United States
senators, and nearly one-third of the House of Representatives. Before
the Revolution eleven colleges were founded. From 1776 to 1800, twelve
more were added; from 1800 to 1830, thirty-three; from 1830 to 1865, one
hundred and eighty; from 1865 to 1898, two hundred and thirty-six. Their
standards, efficiency and equipment are very diverse, many of the
so-called colleges being less effective than some of the better
organized secondary schools. Except in New York and Pennsylvania, there
is no statutory restriction upon the use of the name "college." This is
an abuse to which public attention has in recent years been increasingly
called.[4]
The universities.
In the United States the title "university" is used indiscriminately of
institutions which are in reality universities, of institutions which
are colleges, and of institutions which are so ill-equipped as not to
take rank with good secondary schools. Only time and a greatly increased
capacity to distinguish the various types of higher schools will remedy
this error. Putting aside tentative and unsuccessful attempts to develop
genuine university instruction much earlier, it may safely be said that
the opening of the Johns Hopkins University at Baltimore in 1876 began
the present movement to organize carefully advanced study and research,
requiring a college education of those who wish to enter upon it. This
is university instruction properly so called, and though found
elsewhere, it is given chiefly at fourteen institutions: California
University, Catholic University of America, Chicago University, Clark
University, Columbia University, Cornell University, Harvard University,
Johns Hopkins University, Michigan University, Pennsylvania University,
Princeton University, Leland Stanford Jr. University, Wisconsin
University and Yale University. All of these institutions, except the
Catholic University of America, are also colleges. The combination of
collegiate and university instruction under one corporation and one
executive administration is distinctive of higher education in the
United States, and its chief source of strength. The crowning honour of
the university student is the degree of Ph.D., although that of
A.M.--obtainable in less time and much easier conditions--is also
sought. The minimum period of study accepted for the degree of Ph.D. is
two years after obtaining the bachelor's degree; but in practice, three,
and even four, years of study are found necessary. In addition to
carrying on an investigation in the field of his main subject of study,
the candidate for the degree of Ph.D. is usually required to pass
examinations on one or two subordinate subjects, to possess a reading
knowledge of French and German (often of Latin as well), and to
submit--usually in printed form--the dissertation which embodies the
results of his researches. The methods of instruction in the
universities are the lecture, discussion and work in laboratory or
seminary--the latter transplanted from the German universities. The
degree of Master of Arts is conferred upon students who, after one year
of university residence and study, pass certain prescribed examinations.
This degree, like those of D.D., S.T.D. and LL.D., is often conferred by
colleges and universities as a purely honorary distinction. The degree
of Ph.D. is not so conferred any longer by the best universities. Not a
few of the universities maintain schools of law and medicine. Harvard
and Yale universities maintain schools of theology as well. The learned
publications issued by the universities, or under the direction of
university professors, are of great importance, and constitute an
imposing body of scientific literature. The national and state
governments make increasing use of university officials for public
service requiring special training or expert knowledge. In 1871-1872
there were only 198 resident graduate (or university) students in the
United States. In 1887 this number had risen to 1237, and in 1897 to
4392. These figures are exclusive of professional students, and include
only those who are studying in what would be called, in Germany, the
philosophical faculty. (See also UNIVERSITIES.)
Most extensive provision is made in America for professional, technical
and special education of all kinds, and for the care and training of the
dependent and defective classes (see BLINDNESS and DEAF AND DUMB), as
well as for the education of the Indian (see INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN),
and--in the Southern states--of the negro (q.v.). (N. M. B.)
_Statistics._--Details as to education in each state of the American
Union are given in the articles under state headings. But a more
comprehensive view may be obtained here from the general statistics. The
introduction to the statistical tables in vol. ii. of the Commissioner
of Education's Report for 1907 may usefully be quoted. Mr Edward L.
Thorndike, of the Teachers' College, Columbia University, there
summarizes the national account as follows:--
"We use in formal school education a material plant valued at from
twelve to thirteen hundred million dollars, the labour of 550,000
teachers or other educational officers, and more or less of the time
of some eighteen million students.... We pay for the labour of these
teachers, many of whom work for only part of the normal city-school
year, about $300,000,000. We pay for fuel, light, janitorial services,
repairs, depreciation of books, school supplies, insurance and the
like, about $90,000,000. For depreciation of the plant not so charged
we should properly provide during the year a sinking fund of perhaps
$25,000,000. Adding an interest charge of 5% on the investment in the
plant, our annual bill for formal school education comes to over
$475,000,000. Additions to the plant were made [in 1906-1907] to the
extent of from ninety to a hundred million dollars. As a partial
estimate of the returns from this investment we may take the number of
students whose education has been carried to a specified standard of
accomplishment and power. Thus I estimate that, in 1907, 3000 students
reached the standard denoted by three years or more of academic,
technical or professional study in advance of a reputable college
degree; that 25,000 students reached the standard denoted by at least
three and not over four years of such study in advance of a four-year
high-school course; than an eighth of a million students reached the
standard denoted by at least three and not over four years of study in
advance of an eight-year elementary-school course; and that
three-quarters of a million students reached the standard of
completion of an elementary-school course of seven or eight years or
its equivalent.... Roughly, nine-tenths of elementary education and
the education of teachers, over two-thirds of secondary education, and
over a third of college and higher technical education are provided
and controlled by the public. Professional education, other than the
training of teachers and engineers, is still largely a function of
private provision and control.
"The following rough comparison may serve to define further the status
of education in the country at large. The plant used for formal
education is valued at 1% of our entire national wealth, or twice the
value of our telephone systems, or ten times the value of our Pullman
and private cars, or one-tenth the value of our railroads. The number
of teachers is approximately that of the clergymen, engineers, lawyers
and physicians together, five times that of the regular army and navy,
and about twice that of the saloon-keepers and bar-tenders and their
assistants. The annual expenditure for education, exclusive of
additions to the plant, is somewhat over twice the expenditure for the
war and navy departments of the national government. It is three and a
half times the expenditure of the national government in 1907 for
pensions. It is about one and a fourth times the cost (New York
wholesale prices) of the sugar and coffee we consume annually."
The above comparison indicates perhaps, not inadequately, the "business"
conception of the value of education prevailing in the United States,
where its practical advantages are realized as in no other country, not
even Germany.
From the same report the following statistics may be cited for
1906-1907.
_Common Schools (including Elementary and Secondary Public
Schools only)._
Total number of pupils of all ages 16,820,386[5]
Average number of days schools open 151.2
Average number of days attended by each pupil 106.2
Number of male teachers 105,773
Number of female teachers 369,465
Number of school houses 259,115
Average monthly wage of male teachers $56.10
Average monthly wage of female teachers $43.67
Value of all school property $843,309,410
Income from permanent funds and rents $16,579,551
Income from State taxes $46,281,501
Income from local taxes $230,424,554
Income from other sources $50,317,132
Expenditure on sites, buildings, furniture,
libraries and apparatus $65,817,870
Expenditure on salaries $196,980,919
Expenditure on other purposes $67,882,012
Expenditure per head of population $3.90
Expenditure per pupil $27.98
The Bureau of Education in 1907 received reports from 606
universities, colleges and technological schools; they had a teaching
force of 24,679, and an enrolment of 293,343 students. The number of
public and private normal schools reporting was 259, with an enrolment
of 70,439 students in the regular training courses for teachers,
12,541 graduates and 3660 instructors. There were 148 manual and
industrial training schools (independently of the manual training
taught in the public schools and in 66 Indian schools), with 1692
teachers and an enrolment of 68,427 students; and 445 independent
commercial and business schools, with 2856 instructors and 137,364
students. (X.)
BIBLIOGRAPHY.--For the study of education as an aspect of religious,
social, moral and intellectual development, the material is
practically inexhaustible, and much of the most valuable does not
treat specifically of the education given in schools and colleges. The
most useful guide is E.P. Cubberley's _Syllabus of Lectures on the
History of Education_ (1902), which consists of an analytic outline of
topics with copious and detailed references to authorities. See also
W.S. Monroe's _Bibliography of Education_ (1897). The best general
history in English is P. Monroe's _Text-Book in the History of
Education_ (1905), which, like Davidson's much briefer _History of
Education_, treats the subject broadly and in relation to other
aspects of life. Williams's _History of Ancient, Medieval, and Modern
Education_ is a useful statement of the main facts of educational
progress taken somewhat by itself. In German the standard work is K.A.
Schmid's _Geschichte der Erziehung_, a comprehensive and detailed
treatment in which each period is dealt with by a specialist.
Ziegler's _Geschichte der Padagogik_ is a good short history. In
French, Letourneau's _L'Evolution de l'education_ is especially good
on ancient and non-European education. Draper's _Intellectual
Development of Europe_ is vigorous and interesting, but marred by its
depreciation of the work of the Church. Guizot's _History of
Civilization_ is still of value, as are parts of Hallam's _Literary
History_. Lecky's _History of the Rise and Influence of the Spirit of
Rationalism in Europe_, and Buckle's _History of Civilization_ in
England, contain much that is of value. The best encyclopaedias are W.
Rein's _Encyklopadisches Handbuch der Padagogik_, and F. Buisson's
_Dictionnaire de pedagogie, premiere partie_. Sir Henry Craik's _The
State and Education_ (1883) is an excellent text-book on national
education.
Of books dealing with special periods and topics, S. Laurie's
_Historical Sketch of Pre-Christian Education_, Freeman's _Schools of
Hellas_, Girard's _L'Education athenienne au V^e et au IV^e siecle
avant_ J.-C., Davidson's _Education of the Greek People_, Mahaffy's
_Old Greek Education_ and _Greek Life and Thought_, Nettleship's
article on "Education in Plato's Republic" in _Hellenica_, Capes's
_University Life in Athens_, Hobhouse's _Theory and Practice of
Ancient Education_, Grasberger's _Erziehung und Unterricht im
classischen Alterthum_, Wilkin's _Roman Education_, and Clarke's
_Education of Children at Rome_, are valuable for classical times.
For the somewhat obscure transition centuries there is much of value
in Taylor's _Classical Heritage of the Middle Ages_, Dill's _Roman
Society in the Last Century of the Western Empire_, especially the
chapter on "Culture in the 4th and 5th centuries," Boissier's _La Fin
du paganisme_, and Hatch's _Influence of Greek Thought upon the
Christian Church_.
The best general account of medieval education is in Drane's
_Christian Schools and Scholars_; and J.B. Mullinger's _Schools of
Charles the Great_ treats well of the Carolingian Revival. G.B.
Adams's _Civilization during the Middle Ages_ is excellent; and
Sandys's _History of Classical Scholarship_ is a valuable book of
reference. On the scholastic philosophy Turner's _History of
Philosophy_, and Haureau's _Histoire de la philosophie scolastique_,
are useful. Medieval schools are described in Furnivall's preface to
_The Babees Book_, which deals with "Education in Early England," and
in Leach's _Old Yorkshire Schools_ and _History of Winchester
College_. The most important books on the universities are Rashdall's
_Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages_, Jourdain's _Histoire de
l'universite de Paris aux XVII^e et XVIII^e siecles_, Lyte's _History
of the University of Oxford to 1530_, and Mullinger's _History of the
University of Cambridge to the Accession of Charles I._ Paulsen's
_Geschichte des gelehrten Unterrichts auf den deutschen Schulen und
Universitaten_ is the best history of education in Germany.
On the Renaissance in Italy, Villari's Introduction to his _Life and
Times of Machiavelli_, and Burckhardt's _Die Kultur der Renaissance in
Italien_ (translated into English), are of the first importance. Other
valuable books are the first volume of the _Cambridge Modern History_
and Symonds's great work on _The Renaissance in Italy_, especially the
volume on _The Revival of Learning_. Dealing more specifically with
education are Woodward's excellent monographs on _Education during the
Renaissance_, _Vittorino da Feltre_ and _Erasmus_. Janssen's
_Geschichte des deutschen Volkes_ (translated into English) gives a
good account of the social and intellectual condition of Germany in
the 14th, 15th and 16th centuries. Christie's _Life of Etienne Dolet_
is of value for the Renaissance in France. For the movement in England
Seebohm's _Oxford Reformers_, Gasquet's _Eve of the Reformation in
England_, Einstein's _The Italian Renaissance in England_, and Leach's
_English Schools at the Reformation, 1546-1548_, are particularly
important.
For later times the material is chiefly in the form of monographs, of
which the following, among others, are of value: Adamson's _Pioneers
of Modern Education_, Laas's _Die Padagogik des Johannes Sturm_,
Beard's _Port Royal_, vol. ii., Kuno Fischer's _Fr. Bacon und seine
Nachfolger_, Laurie's _John Amos Comenius_, Morley's _Rousseau_,
Pinloche's _La Reforme de l'education en Allemagne au dix-huitieme
siecle_, Biedermann's _Deutschlands geistige, sittliche, und gesellige
Zustande im XVIII. Jahrhundert_.
For the 19th century and after, the best sources of information are
the official Reports, such as those of the Royal Commissions on the
English Universities, the Public Schools, and the other English
secondary schools; the "Special Reports," issued by the English Board
of Education; the encyclopaedic annual Reports of the American
Commissioner of Education (dealing not only with the United States,
but with progress in other countries); monographs in the French _Musee
pedagogique_, and various German Reports.
For education in the United States, see also Boone's _History of
Education in U.S.A._ (1889); N.M. Butler (editor), _Education in the
U.S.A._ (1900), a series of monographs prepared for the Paris
Exposition; E.G. Dexter's _History of Education in the United States_
(1904); and the _Proceedings_ of the National Educational Association.
On the leading writers on education the monographs in the Great
Educator Series are useful, and editions and translations of the best
known of these writers are available. The greatest systematic
collection is the _Monumenta Germaniae paedagogica_. On the
development of the means of education, Montmorency's two books on
_State Intervention in English Education from the Earliest Times to
1833_, and _The Progress of Education in England_, Balfour's
_Educational Systems of Great Britain and Ireland_, Allain's
_L'Instruction primaire en France avant la Revolution_, Lantoine's
_Histoire de l'enseignement secondaire en France au XVIII^e et au
debut du XVIII^e siecle_, and Konrad Fischer's _Geschichte des
deutschen Volkschullehrerstands_, may be mentioned. (J. Wn.)
FOOTNOTES:
[1] For the evolution of the school as such from early times see
SCHOOLS.
[2] See especially _Das offentliche Unterrichtswesen Deutschlands_,
by Dr Paul Stotzner (Leipzig, 1901).
[3] A valuable bibliography of Mr Harris's contributions to
educational literature is given in the Report of the Commissioner of
Education for 1907 (Washington, 1908).
[4] See especially the second Annual Report of the President of the
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (pp. 76-80),
quoted in the Report for 1907 of the Commissioner of Education.
[5] In private schools there were also 1,304,547 pupils.