FOOTNOTES:

[112] On an examination of the list of the members, it will be found

that Cornwall has produced about the usual average of the English

counties.

[113] Opie painted Bone's portrait, and presented it to him, 1795; also

one of Bartolozzi, the engraver, which is preserved in the National

Portrait Gallery.

[114] A blowing-house is a building where tin ore was smelted prior

to the construction of the larger smelting-works. The first Mrs.

Opie had the name changed to one more consonant with her notions of

connubial felicity. Opie's second wife thus sketched it in a letter

dated 'St. Agnes, 11th mo. 26th, 1832:' 'Yesterday I dined at Harmony

Cot, where my husband and all the family were born and bred. It is a

most sequestered cottage, whitewashed and thatched; a hill rising high

above it, and another in front; trees and flower-beds before it, which

in summer must make it a pretty spot. _Now_ it is not a tempting abode;

but there are two good rooms, and I am glad I have seen it.'

[115] When Polwhele wrote, some seventy or eighty years ago, this

picture was in the possession of Richard Hoskins, Esq., of Carennis.

[116] Mr. Rogers, in his 'Opie and his Works,' has thus classified the

760 works catalogued:

Portraits (counting each head in family groups) 508

Sacred Subjects 22

Historical 17

Shakespeare 11

Poetical and Fancy 134

Landscape 5

Supplementary and addenda (various) 63

----

760

He exhibited altogether 143 pictures at the Royal Academy.

[117] Writing to Southey, from Norwich, 3rd June, 1806, William Taylor

says, 'Opie is soon to be knighted;' and in 1807 he says that Opie had

been at the point of death from abdominal paralysis--probably caused by

the absorption into his system of lead-vapours from his paints.

[118] Mrs. Gilbert says that her father got 250 guineas for engraving

this picture.

[119] Opie painted a _replica_ of Mrs. Delany's portrait for the

Countess of Bute, for which Horace Walpole designed a frame; and I

confess these paintings appear to me to refute entirely the statement

that Opie's female portraits were unsuccessful.

[120] Lonsdale the painter afterwards occupied it: it now forms part of

an hotel.

[121] Betty Opie was a remarkably shrewd and sagacious old lady. She

gave my father most entertaining accounts of her visit to London, when

she went up to see 'Jan,' as she called her illustrious brother, and

especially of an escapade of hers at the British Museum, where, having

accidentally broken off the finger of a mummy, she brought it home to

her brother, who ground it down into a fine brown paint.

[122] An old sweetheart of his, whose portrait he once painted in the

act of milking a cow.

[123] When Opie was painting Charles James Fox's portrait, worried by

many and various criticisms, Fox said, 'Don't attend to _them_; you

_must_ know best.'

[124] In this year he contributed to the Exhibition six portraits, one

of them being that of Dr. Samuel Parr.

[125] That on 'Design' was delivered on 16th Feb., 1807, the others

followed on 23rd Feb., 2nd March, and 9th March.

[126] According to his sister's account, the _post-mortem_ examination

disclosed 'a bladder on the brain'; but Dr. Sayer thought the patient's

malady was a species of painter's colic.

[127] Another of his pupils was John Cawse, the well-known subject

and portrait painter, of whose works the writer possesses an example.

Theophilus Clarke, A.R.A., was another of Opie's pupils.

[128] I fancy, notwithstanding the thin disguise of the title of the

poem, that Mrs. Opie must have been thinking of this portrait when she

wrote the following lines:

'To me how dear this twilight hour,

Cheered by the faggot's varying blaze!

If this be mine, I ask no more

On morn's refulgent light to gaze:

'For now, while on HIS glowing cheek

I see the fire's red radiance fall,

The darkest seat I softly seek,

And gaze on HIM, unseen by all.

'His folded arms, his studious brow,

His thoughtful eye, _unmarked_, I see;

Nor could his voice or words bestow

So dear, so true a joy on me.'

[129] When a lad, Opie used to say that he loved painting 'better than

bread and meat.' Northcote was himself another of our West-country

artists; he was born at Plymouth, close to the Cornish border.

[130] Opie also painted his first wife's portrait with that of

the famous Conjuror Chamberlain. It was at one time in Sir Joshua

Reynolds's Collection ('The lost Opie'), and afterwards passed into the

hands of Sir Charles Bell.

_THE ST. AUBYNS OF CLOWANCE AND THE MOUNT._

[Illustration: (beginning of chapter vignette.)]

_THE ST. AUBYNS OF CLOWANCE AND THE MOUNT._

'A Wit's a feather, and a Chief a rod;--

An HONEST MAN'S the noblest work of God.'

POPE: _Essay on Man_.

'This gentle and knightly family,' as Hals calls them, are amongst

the few examples of eminent Cornishmen who, like the Bevills, the

Grenvilles, the Lanyons, the Chamonds, the Bassets, and others, were of

Norman, or at least of French, origin.

In the 'Chronicum Johannis Brompton' (quoted by John Henneker) we read:

'Vous que desyrez assaver

Le nons de Grauntz de la mer,

Que vindrent od le Conquerour,

William Bastard de graunt vigoure,

* * * * *

Seint Aubyn, et Seynt Omer,

Seynt Filbert Fyens, et Gomer.'

Leland says that St. Albin came out of Brittany; and Camden, in his

'Remains,' names Plaus as the place of their origin; according,

however, to other authorities, St. Aubin du Cormier in Brittany enjoys

this distinction. Of Armorican extraction, they were therefore akin

to Cornishmen, though abiding in 'Little Britain.' Possibly the name

was not an uncommon one; and either of the two above surmises may be

correct. There are now upwards of thirty French Communes into which

the name of St. Aubin enters: to say nothing of the picturesque little

village in Jersey of that name, which fringes the shores of St. Aubin's

Bay.

Their first English home seems to have been in Somersetshire; and

here, in the middle of the fourteenth century, we find Guy de St.

Aubyn, or Albin, settled at Alfoxton. It seems to have been he who, by

his marriage with Eleanor Knoville, first obtained a footing on the

Cornish soil; and, according to Tonkin, it was his grandson, Geffrey,

who took up his abode at Clowance on the latter's marriage with

Elizabeth Kymyell of Kymyell, the sole heir of Piers Kymyell and his

wife, a daughter of--as Tonkin assures us, 'an old and notable Cornish

family'--the house of Sergeaux, or Seriseaux. Their son Geffrey has a

monument in Crowan church, thus inscribed:

'Hic jacent Galfridus Seynt aubyn, Et Alicia uxor ejus, filia et heres

Johannes Tremure de Iaunebet, Armigeri, qui quidem Galfridus obiit

tertio die mensis Octobris, Anno Domini, Mill'imo cccc^o; Alicia obiit

Anno Domini Mill'imo cccc^o; quorum Animabus propicietur deus, Amen.

Jhu mercy, lady help.'

Since the time of the first Geffrey, the St. Aubyns, for nearly

thirty descents, have dwelt at their pleasantly situated seat[131] at

Clowance, 'the ancient house of an ancient gentleman,' as Norden calls

it; though the present mansion dates only from the early part of the

present century.

From the days of Richard II., the St. Aubyns have frequently filled the

post of High Sheriff of Cornwall, and have also served their country as

Members of Parliament and Justices of the Peace. For several descents

they have been Baronets, until at last the name of 'Sir John St. Aubyn,

Bart., M.P.,' has become in Cornwall a 'household word.'

Of the earlier members of the family I have found little of interest,

unless, indeed, it be the remarkable physique of one of them, Sir

Mauger de St. Albin, who lived at Barnton; in Risdon's 'Devonshire,'

it is stated that he was a man of enormous strength and stature, as is

evidenced by a huge stone thrown by him to a great distance, and by his

very large effigy on a tomb in the church.

On their settling in Cornwall, the St. Aubyns followed the accustomed

(perhaps the almost inevitable) practice of intermarrying with the

old county families--the Tremeres, the Trethurfes, the Trenowiths,

the Grenvilles of Stow; and, in later times, with the Arundells, the

Godolphins, the Pendarveses, the Killigrews, the Bullers, the Bassets,

the Prideauxes, and the Molesworths.

Of the fruit of one of the pre-Reformation marriages--namely, that

of Thomas St. Aubyn (who was Sheriff of Cornwall in 1545) with Mary,

fourth daughter of Thomas Grenville of Stow, we have a touching little

notice in the MSS. Lisle papers preserved at the Public Record Office.

Thomas is writing to his sister-in-law, Honor Grenville, Viscountess

Lisle; and the following passage occurs in his letter:

'My daughter Phelyp is departyd on Crstmas Day, Almyghtie (God) pardon

her soule; and my wyffe hath take grette discōfort therbye; but, I

thank our Lord, she doth take it better way, and thankyth god of his

sending.'

From this marriage of Thomas St. Aubyn with Mary Grenville, descended

his grandson, Thomas,--the St. Aubyn of Carew's days--of whom that

historian of his native county wrote thus:

'Saintabin, whose very name (besides the Conquest roll) deduceth his

first ancestors out of France. His grandfather married Greinvile;

his father, one of Whittington's coheirs: which latter couple, in

a long and peaceable date of years, exercised a kind, liberal, and

never-discontinued hospitality. He himself took to wife the daughter

of Mallet; and with ripe knowledge, and sound judgment, dischargeth

the place which he beareth in his country.'

I find nothing further of general interest touching the family until

we come to the stirring times of the Civil War--a conflict in which

Cornwall took, as is well known, a distinguished part. Until that

period the St. Aubyns seem to have been a thriving and distinguished

family, serving their country in the various capacities already

mentioned, and 'gathering house to house, and vineyard to vineyard.'

Their possessions were in almost every part of the county: for

instance, Lysons (who was indebted to the fifth Sir John St. Aubyn

for the loan of Borlase's MS. folio of notes on Cornwall) says that,

amongst other properties, 'The manor of Godolphin is still held of

Sir John St. Aubyn, as of his manor of Lambourne, by the payment of

a gammon of bacon;' and, that the manors of Berippa and Penpons were

in the possession of the St. Aubyns; also a moiety of the manor of

Gaverigan in St. Columb Major, the manor of Argallez or Arrallas in

St. Enoder, of Trelowith in St. Erth, of half of Treninick in St.

Gorran, Kimiel and Butsava in Paul, and Mayon in Sennen; they were

also impropriators of the great tithes of Crowan, and patrons of the

Vicarage; and they held a moiety of the advowson of the rectory of

Duloe. The revenues of the nunnery of Clares, which formerly stood near

the junction of Boscawen and Lemon Streets, Truro, came (according to

Hals) into the possession of Sir John Seyntaubin and others; and again,

the Priory of Tywardreath, so Davies Gilbert tells us, 'was the joint

property of the St. Aubyns, and the Pendarveses of Roscrow.'

To return to the family at the time of the great struggle between the

King and his Parliament. Most of the Cornish gentry sided, as is well

known, with the King, and behaved with such marked valour and success

as to elicit from Charles the well-known letter of thanks which still

hangs in many of the churches in the county. One of the St. Aubyns of

the day,[132] however, seems, according to Hals, to have thrown in his

lot with the Parliament; he was at the siege of Plymouth, in 1644; and

was present at the defeat of his party at the battle of Braddock Down,

near Lostwithiel.

Hals tells us that, after the rout of the Roundheads, 'it was resolved

by Essex's council that he should desert his army, and, privately by

night, in a boat, go down the river to Fowey, and from thence take

ship for Plymouth; which expedient was accordingly put in execution,

and the General Essex, the Lord Robartes, and some others, the next

day got into Plymouth, being the 31st August, 1644. On the same day

Sir William Balfour, with two thousand five hundred of the Parliament

horse, with divers officers, viz., Colonel Nicholas Boscawen, his

Lieutenant Colonel James Hals, of Merther, Henry Courtenay, of St.

Bennet's in Lanyvet, _Colonel John Seyntaubyn, of Clowans_, and his

Lieutenant Colonel Braddon, Colonel Carter, and several other officers

and gentlemen of quality, early in the morning forced their passage

over St. Winnow, Boconnock, and Braddock Downs, though the body of the

King's army, which lay encamped on the heath in those places, maugre

all opposition to the contrary; from thence they rode to Leskeard, from

thence to Saltash Passage, and from thence to Plymouth safely the same

day, amidst their own garrison and confederates.'

Whether from conviction, or from a wish to be well with either party in

the State--whichever might succeed--it seems pretty clear that another

member of the family, Thomas, espoused the cause of the Royalists.

His monument in Crowan Church so describes him; and in the spring of

1882 I saw, on the walls of the principal staircase at Clowance, his

portrait--hard, but apparently faithful--in Cavalier costume.

Of the second baronet I find nothing to note, except that he was

Sheriff of Cornwall in 1705.

But the third[133] Sir John St. Aubyn, the sturdy little Cornish

baronet--of whom Walpole said, 'all these men (his opponents in

Parliament) have their price except him'--claims more of our attention

than, perhaps, any other member of the family. He was born on 27th

September, 1696, and we get a glimpse of his early life, when at Exeter

College, Oxford, in the following extract from a letter written by his

friend and fellow-collegian, Borlase, in 1772, to a lady in London.

The MS. is amongst that collection at Castle Horneck, which formed the

subject of an interesting article[134] in the _Quarterly Review_, vol.

139; and the following extract describes the homeward journey of the

two young fellows. A hundred years ago this must have been a somewhat

formidable undertaking; and we almost regret that the chronicler did

not furnish us with more details than he has done:

'1772 * * * Sometimes,' writes Borlase, 'we met with a landlord in

men's clothes, but for the most part we discovered that the men had

dropt their prerogation, and we found the supreme authority over

the inns lodged in gowns and petticoats. Ordered by Sir John not to

write one word of the pretty black-ey'd girl at Bridport, but to

go on with the particulars of our journey. I think I am at liberty

to tell you of a misfortune which happened to me at Launceston. As

we were passing though that fatal town (I am heartily sorry I have

forgot what day of the month 'twas), but, however, as we were passing

through, whom should we see at the door of an inn but our landlord's

daughter! Whether Sir John was dry and thirsty or not I can't tell,

but we all agreed to take our pint at the door, and being men of no

little gallantry because just come from town, we were talking very

smartly, as you may imagine, to the girl who filled the wine, when

all of a sudden, my unfortunate eyes happened to fix upon a green

ribbon that hung playing to-and-fro with the air a little lower than

it should. As I was the only person that discovered it, I told the

lady I was apprehensive she would lose that pretty ribbon if she did

not withdraw. I was then on horseback, and, to my great confusion, had

not the presence of mind to alight and take care of it myself, upon

which Sir John has so teased and bantered me that I have had no rest

ever since. I beg you would write Sir John, and let him know that such

a misfortune deserves rather pity than upbraidings. And now, Madam, I

suppose you are almost as tired with our journey as we are, or (to go

as far as possible with the comparison) as three of Sir John's horses,

which we left upon the road.'

The writer of the article goes on to say:

* * * * *

'We must now turn away for a moment from the pleasant scenes at

Ludgvan, and follow Borlase's friend of college days as he enters

the chapel at St. Stephen's--the youngest member, perhaps, of that

distinguished assembly. Born in the year 1700, Sir John St. Aubyn was

only just of age when, in 1722, he was returned to Parliament for his

native county. Different indeed, yet in one respect alike, had been

the destinies of the friends since we left them after their journey

in the beginning of the year. Parting, the one to mix in the affairs

of State in times the most perplexing, the other to the peaceful

seclusion of his country parsonage; each had, nevertheless, marked

out for himself a path of mental activity. That the confidence of his

country, though entrusted to so young a man, had not been misplaced,

may be judged from an extract in the correspondence before us. Thus, a

gentleman writing from London, March 2nd, 1726, observes: "Sir R.----

[Sir Robert Walpole] this Session has met with a strong opposition in

the House of Commons; Sir John St. Aubyn has gained a great reputation

in that House, and the opinions of our politicians in relation to war

or peace are as different as their faces."

'A year or two later an incident in Cornish history gave him an

opportunity of making himself more than ever beloved at home. In

1727, when, as Hume tells us, "the Courts of France and Spain were

perfectly reconciled, and all Europe was freed from the calamities of

war, the peace of Great Britain was disturbed by tumults amongst the

tinners of Cornwall, who, being provoked by a scarcity of corn, rose

in arms and plundered the granaries of the county." At this time it

happened that Sir John had just completed a new pier at the Mount,

to facilitate the exportation of tin, which was shipped in large

quantities at that place.[135] The consequence was that the tinners

congregated in considerable numbers; the place became a rendezvous

for malcontents, and fresh riots broke out. Very serious consequences

were apprehended, and what might actually have happened none can say,

had it not been that the magnanimous spirit and unselfish patriotism

of the young statesman showed itself in a measure of local policy

which doubly endeared him to his countrymen. He "forthwith advanced

a considerable sum of money to the tinners, by which they were saved

from starving, or the necessity of plundering their neighbours."

"Constant in his attendance and application to the business of the

House of Commons," writes Borlase, in a note attached to the St.

Aubyn pedigree, "he soon learnt to speak well, but spoke seldom, and

never but on points of consequence. He was heard with pleasure by

his friends, and with respect by others." In 1734 he seconded the

repeal of the Septennial Act, in a speech which will be found in the

"Handy Book of British Eloquence."'

And here we must leave the _Quarterly_ Reviewer for awhile, in order

to give a sample of Sir John's oratorical powers. I quote from the

report, in the _Gentleman's Magazine_ for 1734, of his speech of the

13th March, on seconding Mr. Bromley's motion.

Sir John began by vigorously sketching the characters of those

monarchs who were fond of 'Long Parliaments,' and thus referred to the

Parliaments of Charles II., who, he said, 'naturally took a surfeit of

Parliaments in his Father's time, and was therefore extremely desirous

to lay them aside. But this was a scheme impracticable. However, in

effect he did so, for he obtained a Parliament, which by its long

Duration, like an army of Veterans, became so exactly disciplined to

his own Measures, that they knew no other command but from that Person

who gave them their Pay.

'This was a safe and a most ingenious way of enslaving a Nation. It

was very well known that Arbitrary Power, if it was open and avowed,

would never prevail here. The people were therefore amused with the

Specious Form of their Antient Constitution; it existed, indeed, in

their Fancy; but, like a mere Phantom, had no Substance nor Reality

in it, for the Power, the Authority, the Dignity of Parliament were

wholly lost. This was that remarkable Parliament which so justly

obtained the opprobrious Name of "Model," from which, I believe, some

Later Parliaments have been exactly copied.'

He then went on to describe the evils of Long Parliaments, saying:

'But this must be the Work of Time. Corruption is of so base a

Nature, that at first sight it is extremely shocking. Hardly anyone

has submitted to it all at once. His Disposition must be previously

understood; the particular Bait must be found out with which he is to

be allured; and, after all, it is not without many struggles that he

surrenders his Virtue. Indeed, there are some who will at once plunge

themselves over Head and Ears into any base Action; but the generality

of mankind are of a more cautious Nature, and will proceed only by

some leisurely Degrees. One or two perhaps have deserted their Colours

the first Campaign; some have done it in a second. But a great many

who have not that eager Disposition to Vice will wait till a Third.

'For this reason, Short Parliaments have been less Corrupt than Long

Ones; they are observed, like Streams of Water, always to grow more

impure the greater Distance they run from the Fountain-head.'

The independent speaker finished with this spirited peroration:

'The Power of the Crown is very justly apprehended to be growing to a

monstrous--I should have said, too great--a Size, and several Methods

have been unsuccessfully proposed for restraining it within due Bounds.

'But our Disease, I fear, is of a complicated Nature, and I think

that this Motion is wisely intended to remove the first and Principal

Disorder. Give the people their antient Right of frequent new

Elections; That will restore the decay'd Authority of Parliament, and

will put our Constitution into a natural Condition of working out

her Cure. Sir, upon the whole I am of opinion that I can't express a

greater Zeal for his Majesty, for the Liberties of the People, or the

Honour and Dignity of this House, than in seconding the Motion which

the Hon. Gentleman has made you.'

It should be remembered that such sentiments as these were uttered to

an audience--not of his constituents, whom he might have felt bound to

please, but to a thoroughly corrupted House of Commons, at a period

when '_not_ to be corrupted was the shame;' and in the presence of

a powerful Minister, whom few men of the day were either strong or

virtuous enough to dare to thwart. The chubby, youthful-faced portrait

of the little Sir John hangs in the dining-room at Clowance: childish

the face may be; but, as if in apology for his small, juvenile

presence, he points with his right hand to the Mount, to indicate that

his principles were as firm and unshaken as that 'hoar rock.'[136]

The _Quarterly_ Reviewer (from whom we again quote), after concluding

his observations on Sir John's speech in 1734, goes on to say:

'In the same year a curious incident occurred in the neighbourhood

of his seat at Clowance, with which Sir John was only indirectly

connected in his capacity of Justice of the Peace, but which was

ultimately attended with very serious consequences to himself and

his family. A certain Henry Rogers, by trade a pewterer, having some

fancied claim to an estate called Skewis, seized the manor house,

and, surrounding himself with a band of cut-throats, organized a

rebellion on his own account, and bade defiance to the country round.

Having beaten off from his house, not without bloodshed, first the

sheriff, next the constables, and finally the military themselves,

the villain succeeded in making good his escape. He was subsequently

arrested at Salisbury, and brought to Launceston for trial, where the

grand jury found five bills of murder against him, and Lord Chief

Justice Hardwicke publicly returned thanks to Sir John "for his steady

endeavours to bring him to justice."[137]

'The terror, however, which this ruffian caused in the neighbourhood

can scarcely be realized nowadays, and the menacing letters received

by Lady St. Aubyn so preyed upon her mind, that they brought on a

"sensible decay," or, as we should call it now, a rapid decline, from

the effects of which, in 1740, she died.[138]

'With the death of his wife, Sir John's interest in country life came

to an end; and leaving his son to the care and instruction of his old

friend at Ludgvan, he set out for a foreign land. Meanwhile, however,

the parliamentary horizon was rapidly clouding over; a crisis was

clearly imminent; and, on his return to England, it was to find that,

for the present at least, his sorrow must be drowned in more work,

in a redoubled attention to those duties which his early reputation

now pointed to him to fulfil. And thus, as the Walpole Administration

draws on to its close, the figure of Sir John St. Aubyn--the "little

baronet," as he was called--comes prominently to the front as one of

the most vigorous, as he certainly was the most conscientious, of the

opponents of the then unpopular Prime Minister. On the subject of

the vote of thanks, including an approbation of the manner in which

the Spanish War had been prosecuted, which was carried by a small

majority in the House of Commons early in 1741, he writes (April 9th)

as follows: "I believe ye Folks in ye country are very much puzzled

abo^t many of our Proceedings, and I don't wonder at y^r doubts about

that unseasonable vote of Innocence; especially when ye Opportunity

was so fairly given, w^{ch} ye Nation has been so long expecting us to

take ye advantage of." But the country party the while felt that no

opportunity must be lost, and no vigour spared in the attack. Contrast

the tone of the following extract from a letter dated May 5th, and

note how the space of one single month had served to fan the flame.

Sir John now inveighs against "such Insolence in Administration, such

wantonness in Power, w^{ch} surely nothing could produce but that

mistaken vote of Innocence, w^{ch} so lately happen'd. And yet," he

continues, "this is y^e Man ag^t whom we want evidence to advise his

Removal, when at my very door there are such glaring Proofs, which,

in less corrupt times, would deprive Him of his Head." Day by day the

enemies of the Ministry acquired fresh strength: the elections were

against the Court interest, even Westminster returning two members

hostile to it. Walpole tottered on the brink of ruin, and had it

not been that, during a short adjournment of the House in 1742, he

resigned his office and was elevated to the peerage, he might, as we

know, even have been committed to the Tower.

'No sooner had Parliament reassembled than a measure was brought in

by Lord Limerick, and seconded by Sir John St. Aubyn, to inquire into

the conduct of the last twenty years. This was lost by two votes; but

another, also proposed by Lord Limerick on the 23rd of March, for

an inquiry into the conduct of Robert, Earl of Orford, was carried,

and a Select Committee appointed by ballot. And now came Sir John's

political triumph. To this committee he was appointed by every vote

in the House of Commons, to the number of 518. "An honour," says the

MS. from which we quote, "neither then nor before (as far as the

Records of Parliament can reach) ever conferred on any member, as Mr.

Speaker Onslow on the spot observed to Sir John's great commendation."

When the committee was appointed he declined the offer of the chair,

and Lord Viscount Limerick was chosen chairman. The following is an

extract from a letter of Sir John's, dated from the Secret Committee

Chamber, June 22nd, 1742: "We are now," he writes, "winding up our

bottoms as well as we can under y^e disabillitys which we have been

fetter'd with, nothwithstanding which, we shall show the world

enough to convince if not convict. I am sorry there has been so much

unconcern in y^e Gentlemen of our country; I wish I could say in some

an unconcern only. We have had, and I wish we mayn't for ever now have

lost, y^e only opportunity which may happen to retrieve y^e Honour and

establish y^e National Institutions of y^e Country.... The Town is in

high spirits at present, upon the accounts we have from Germany and

Italy. This turn is not owing to y^e merit of y^e new Administration,

but to y^e Vigour of this Parliament, which has had Its free Operation

during this Inter-Regnum of Power, and whenever that happens, England

must have Its due Influence upon y^e Continent; and if she had acted

as she ought for some years past, what might have been brought about,

when y^e bare expectation of her acting has produc'd such great

events?"

'"About this time," says Dr. Borlase, "Sir John being offer'd to take

place as one of the Lords of the Admiralty, he was ready, he said,

to serve his King and country, but would take no place unless upon

the express condition that his freedom and independency in Parliament

should remain unquestioned and uncontroll'd. These were not times to

endure, much less shake hands with such inflexible Virtues; as he

coveted no place, he never had one, 'though capable of any.'"

'On the 31st March, 1744, when war was declared with France, the

inhabitants of Mount's Bay became alarmed for the safety of their

trade. Two things were required; a stationary armed vessel to protect

their shores and fisheries from privateers (for three of the principal

fishermen had already been taken prisoners), and a cruiser to convey

the exports and imports necessary for working the mines. For the

part he took in obtaining these advantages, Sir John received the

thanks of the gentlemen of the neighbourhood, assembled as usual in

their Parliament at the Bowling Green at Marazion. St. Michael's

Mount he had restored from a ruined monastic cell to a comfortable

dwelling-house; but he never lived to visit it again, dying of fever,

at Pencarrow, on his way home in the year 1744, at the early age of

forty-four; "to the great regret of all who knew him; and to his

country's loss of a most faithful friend."

'"The dignity of this ancient family," writes Borlase in the brief

memoir attached to his pedigree, "owes much to this gentleman;" and

Dr. Oliver, of Bath, in a letter of sympathy on the occasion of

his death, speaks of him as "one who had bravely withstood all the

temptation that honours or profit could lay in his way, and dared

to stand almost single on the field of Purity, while thousands fell

on his right hand and ten thousands on his left, the easy Prey of

corruption." Farther on he adds, "Let us thank Heaven who lent us

the great, good man so long, and neither wonder nor murmur at his

being taken from us so soon, especially when we consider how little

Influence his Example had upon Earth." There is something in a

character like his which renders it worthy of the admiration and the

love of generations; nay, of centuries, far beyond his own.'

The year before he died the following verses appeared in the

_Gentleman's Magazine_ (vol. xiii.) in allusion to the firm patriotism

and self-reliant character of our hero:

Cornish Worthies: Sketches of Some Eminent Cornish Men and Families, Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 59 / 75 题