CHAPTER XV. CHRISTIANITY IN IRELAND.

According to the accounts in the New Testament, the wise men of the

East, meaning Persia, had foretold the coming of Christ. The fulfilment

of the ancient Persian prophecy as applied to Jesus, together with the

reference to the "star" which the Maji saw, and which went before them

till it came and stood over where the young child lay, furnishes a

striking illustration of the manner in which Eastern legends and

ancient sacred writings are interwoven with the doctrines relating to

Christianity.

In the sacred books of the East it is prophesied that "after three

thousand and one hundred years of the Caligula are elapsed, will appear

King Saca to remove wretchedness from the world." We have seen that at

the birth of Christ the time had arrived for a new solar incarnation.

Regarding the introduction of Christianity into Ireland it is claimed by

certain writers that the Irish did not receive the "new religion" from

Greek missionaries; but when at the close of the cycle, a new

solar deity, an avatar of Vishnu or Crishna was announced, and when

missionaries from the East proclaimed the glad tidings of a risen

Savior, the Irish people gladly accepted their teachings, not, however,

as a new system, but as the fulfilment to them of the prophecy of the

most ancient seers of the East, and as part and parcel of the religion

of their forefathers. Therefore when the devotees of the Romish faith,

probably about the close of the fifth century of the Christian era,

attempted to "convert" Ireland, they found a religion differing from

their own only in the fact that it was not subject to Rome, and was free

from the many corruptions and superstitions which through the extreme

ignorance and misapprehension of its Western adherents had been

engrafted upon it.

Concerning the form of religious worship in Great Britain, and the fact

that phallic worship prevailed there, Forlong writes: "The generality of

our countrymen have no conception of the overruling prevalence of this

faith, and the number of its lingham gods throughout our Islands."

These symbols were always in the form of an obelisk or tower, thereby

indicating the worship of the male energy. Although emblems of the

female element in the deity were present, they were less pronounced and

of far less importance than those of the male.

These monuments were erected on knolls, at crossroads and centers of

marts or villages, and were placed on platforms which were usually

raised from five to seven steps. A few years ago the shires of

Gloucester, Wilts, and Somerset still claimed over two hundred of these

crosses, though all of them were not at that time in a perfect state of

preservation.

It would seem that in Britain and Ireland the seed of the "new"

doctrine, that which involved a recognition of the mother element in the

god-idea, had fallen on more congenial soil, for within three centuries

after the birth of Christ, the various original monuments typifying the

male principle had all been ornamented with the symbols representing the

female in the deity. The ancient religious structures of the Lingaites

still continued as recognized faith shrines, changed only by the emblems

of the new religion which had been engrafted upon them.

The earliest Greek and Roman missionaries knew full well the

significance of these symbols, and we are given to understand that "a

few of the more spiritual of the Christian sects made war upon them

and all their ephemeral substitutes, such as Maypoles, holy-trees, real

crosses, etc." It is declared also that, as "later" Christians were

unacquainted with the significance of these emblems, "they adopted them

as their own, employing them as the mystic signs of their own faith."

Although the earliest Greek and Roman missionaries understood the

signification of these faith shrines, the complaints against them seem

soon to have ceased, and the "fierce wars" waged over them appear to

have left little trace of their ravages, except that the female emblems

with which these monuments had been supplied by those who had received

the new faith direct from the East, were all removed. As the male

monuments and symbols were all permitted to remain undisturbed, this

fact of itself would seem to indicate that the "pagan abominations"

against which these pious devotees of a "spiritual religion" thundered

their denunciations, included only the female emblems.

The fact must be borne in mind that the Western Church, which was

rapidly usurping the ecclesiastical authority of Britain and Ireland,

had not itself at this time adopted the worship of the Virgin Mary.

A set of iconoclastic monks whom the Christian world is pleased to

designate as St. Patrick, and who probably early in the fifth century of

our era amused themselves by chiseling from the Irish monuments many of

the symbols of the female power, removed also the figures of serpents

which had for ages appeared in connection with the emblems of woman, and

by this act won the plaudits of an admiring Christian world; chiefly,

however, for the skill manifested in "banishing snakes from Ireland."

In addition to this dignified amusement, we find that the same person or

set of persons ordered to be burned hundreds of volumes of the choicest

Irish literature, volumes which contained the annals of the ancient

Irish nation, and in which, it is believed, was stored much actual

information concerning the remote antiquity of the human race.

The extent to which the worship of the male emblems of generation

prevailed in the Christian Church even as late as the 16th century,

proves that it was not the particular symbols connected with the worship

of fertility upon which the Western Christian missionaries made war,

but, on the contrary, that it was the recognition by them of that

detested female element against which, even before the erection of the

Tower of Babel, there had been almost a constant warfare. The rites

of Potin, or Photin, Bishop of Lyons, who was honored in Provence,

Languedoc and the Lyonais as St. Fontin, also the rites performed in

many of the Christian Churches as late as the 16th century, prove that

the devotees of the Christian system were not at this time a whit behind

their Pagan predecessors in their zeal for "heathen abominations." The

only difference being that the Druids, a people who still retained a

faint conception of ancient Nature worship, had not become entirely

divested of the purer ideas which in an earlier age of the race had

constituted a creative force.

That the war of the sexes was revived, and that for many centuries much

strife was engendered over the exact importance which should be ascribed

to the female element in the Deity may not be doubted.

An ancient homily on Trinity Sunday has the following: "At the deth of

a manne, three bells should be ronge as his kuyl in worship of the

Trinitie, and for a woman, who was the Second Person of the Trinitie

two bells should be ronge." Upon this subject Hargrave Jennings remarks:

"Here we have the source of the emblematic difficulty among the master

masons who constructed the earlier cathedrals, as to the addition, and

as to the precise value of the second (or feminine) tower of the Western

end or Galilee of the Church."(148)

148) Rosicrucians, vol. i., p. 206.

The fact that the religion of the ancient Irish, who, were phallic

worshippers, was modified but not radically changed by the introduction

of Christianity, is believed by at least one of the Irish historians of

that country. He says:

"The church festivals themselves, in our Christian calendar, are but the

direct transfers from the Tuath-de-danaans' ritual. Their very names in

Irish are identically the same as those by which they were distinguished

by that early race. If, therefore, surprise has heretofore been excited

at the conformity observable between our church institutions and those

of the East, let it in future subside at the explicit announcement that

Christianity, with us, was the revival of a religion imported amongst us

many ages before by the Tuath-de-danaans from the East, and not from any

chimerical inundation of Greek missionaries--a revival upon which their

hearts were lovingly riveted, and which Fiech, the Bishop of Sletty,

unconsciously registers in the following couplet, viz.:

"The Buddhists of Irin prophesied

That new times of peace would come."(149)

149) The Round Towers of Ireland, p. 493.

The conditions surrounding the ancient inhabitants of the "White

Island," or Ireland, a remnant of which people may be observed in the

Highlanders of Scotland, furnish an example of the fact that a much

higher standard of life had been preserved among them than is known to

have prevailed either among the Jews or the Greeks. The comparatively

advanced stage of progress which is now known to have existed in

Ireland at the beginning of the present era, which even the bigotry and

falsehood of Roman priestcraft have not been able wholly to conceal, is

seen to have been a somewhat corrupted remnant of a civilization which

followed closely on ancient Nature worship.(150)

150) It is thought by certain writers that when the Tuath-de-danaans

emigrated from Persia to the "White Island" they found it inhabited

by the Fir-Bolgs, a colony of Celts. After conquering the island they

engrafted upon it the religion, laws, learning and culture of the mother

country. In a later age the Scythians, whose religion was similar

to that of the Fir-Bolgs, united with them and succeeded in making

themselves masters of the situation.

Hence the intermingling of races and tongues among the ancient Irish.

The Druids adopted, or appropriated, the religion and culture of the

Tuath-de-danaans, who, it is claimed, were the real Hibernians. The

Scythians changed the name of Irin to Scotia--the latter being retained

until the 11th century. According to the annals of the ancient Irish,

Scotland was formerly called Scotia Minor to distinguish it from Scotia

Major, or Ireland.

Because of their isolated position, or for some cause at present

unknown, these people do not seem to have degenerated into a nation of

sensualists. It is true they had departed a long distance from the early

conditions of mankind under which altruism and the abstract principle

of Light or Wisdom were worshipped under the form of a Virgin Mother and

her child, but they never wholly rejected the female element in their

god-idea, nor never, so far as known, attempted to degrade womanhood.

Women were numbered among their legislators, at the same time that they

officiated as educators and priestesses. In fact wherever the Druidical

order prevailed women exerted a powerful influence in all departments

of human activity. Among the Germans, Valleda, a Druidess, was for ages

worshipped as a deity.

It is recorded that St. Bridget planted a monastery for women at Kildare

and entrusted to its inmates the keeping of the sacred fire, and that

in later times the Asiatic missionaries founded there a female monkish

order. After the establishment of Western Christianity, however, no

woman was permitted to enter into the monasteries, and we are assured

that this ridiculous affectation of purity was extended even to the

grave. During the earlier ages of Christianity, in many portions of

Ireland there were cemeteries for men and women distinct from each

other. "It had been a breach of chastity for monks and nuns to be

interred within the same enclosure. They should fly from temptations

which they could not resist."

Although volumes have been written to prove that Christianity was

carried to Britain by Paul, and although the energies of scores of

Romish writers have been employed in attempting to prove that Ireland

was in heathen darkness prior to its conversion by the priests of the

Romish Church, yet these efforts so vigorously put forward seem only

to strengthen the evidence going to show that the Christianity of the

British Isles antedates that of either Paul or Rome.

According to Scripture, Claudia, the wife of the Senator Pudens of

Britain, was a Christian,(151) as was also Graecina, the wife of

Plautus, who was governor of Britain in the first century. The latter,

it is related, was accused before the Roman senate of "practicing some

foreign superstition." Although Lingard, in his History and Antiquities

of the Anglo-Saxon Church, has endeavored to annul the force of the

evidence which places two Christian women from Britain in Rome during

the first century of our era, he is nevertheless constrained to use the

following language: "We are, indeed, told that history has preserved

the names of two British females, Claudia and Pomponia Graecina, both of

them Christians, and both living in the first century of our era."(152)

151) 2 Timothy, iv., 21.

152) Vol. i., p. 1.

According to the Romanists, between the years 177-181 of the Christian

era, a British king named Lucius sent a messenger to the authorities at

Rome, with a request that he with his people be admitted into the bosom

of the "Holy Catholic Church." By those not prejudiced in favor of

the Romish hierarchy, this bit of amusing "evidence" shows the anxiety

manifested lest the facts concerning the religious history of the

British Isles become known. Regarding this embassy of King Lucius there

is an extant version which is far more in accordance with reason and

with the known facts concerning this people.

When we remember the advanced stage of civilization which existed in

Ireland prior to the Christian era, and when we bear in mind the fact

that, as in the case of Abarras mentioned by various Greek writers, the

people of the British Isles were wont to send emissaries abroad for the

sole purpose of gathering information relative to foreign laws, customs,

usages, manners, and modes of instruction, we are not surprised to learn

that the message to Rome sent by Lucius, instead of containing a

request for admission to a foreign church, embodied an enquiry into the

fundamental principles underlying Roman jurisprudence; and especially

does this appear reasonable when we remember that the remodeling of the

Roman code on principles of equity and justice had for several centuries

employed the energies of the best minds in Rome.

Concerning the planting of Christianity in Ireland, we have the

following from Ledwich:

"Thus Bishop Lawrence in Bede tells us Pope Gregory sent him and Austin

to preach the Gospel in Britain, as if it never before had been heard,

whereas the latter met seven British Bishops who nobly opposed him. In

like manner Pope Adrian commissioned Henry II. to enlarge the bounds

of the church, and plant the faith in Ireland, when it had already been

evangelized for eight hundred years. The faith to be planted was blind

submission to Rome and the annual payment of Peter's pence."(153)

153) Antiquities of Ireland, p. 78.

Of the exact time at which Romish and Greek missionaries first went to

Ireland we are not informed, but there is ample evidence going to prove

that a regular hierarchy had been established in that island before the

beginning of the fifth century, and that this religion which had been

brought in through the efforts of missionaries from the East was, by

the legendary writers of the later Christian Church, ascribed to Romish

monks.

The Jealousy of the Romish priests, and the means employed by them to

usurp the ecclesiastical authority of the Irish people, is shown in the

history of their councils. The 5th canon of the Council of Ceale-hythe

requires

"that none of Irish extraction be permitted to usurp to himself the

sacred ministry in any one's diocese, nor let it be allowed such an one

to touch anything which belongs to those of the holy order....; neither

must he administer the eucharist to the people because we are not

certain how or by whom he was ordained."

After quoting the above Ledwich queries thus: If St. Patrick had been

a missionary of the Romish Church, would the Anglo-Saxon clergy have

abjured the spiritual children of that see? In the year 670 Theodoret,

Archbishop of Canterbury, decreed that they who were consecrated by

Irish or British Bishops should be confirmed anew by Catholic ones.(154)

154) Ledwich, Antiquities of Ireland, p. 81.

It is observed that as early as the fourth century A.D. there were three

hundred bishops in Ireland, and to account for so large a number, it is

declared that ignorant legendary writers had recourse to the fable of

St. Patrick.

The remarkable "conversion" of the Irish to Romish Christianity, which

it is said took place in the latter part of the fourth century or the

beginning of the fifth, is to be explained by the fact that a number of

Romish priests or monks which in later ages came to be designated as St.

Patrick, claimed all the monasteries, bishops, and priests already

there as a result of the remarkable power and pious zeal of this

miracle-working saint. It is claimed that St. Patrick founded over three

thousand monasteries, consecrated three hundred bishops, and ordained

three thousand priests.

According to Ledwich and other writers, this St. Patrick was not heard

of earlier than the ninth century A.D., and the legend concerning him

"was not accepted until the twelfth century, at which time his miracles

are set forth with great gusto."

Nothing, perhaps, which is recorded of this monk will go farther toward

proving him a myth than the miracles ascribed to his saintship.

While yet an infant he raised the dead, brought forth fire from ice,

expelled a devil from a heifer, caused a new river to appear from the

earth, and changed water into honey.

"These were but the infant sports of this wonder-working saint. The

miracles recorded in holy writ, even that of creation itself, are

paralleled, and, if possible, surpassed by those of our spiritual

hero."(155)

155) Ledwich, Antiquities of Ireland.

Concerning St. Patrick, Forlong writes:

"Various Patricks followed from Britain and Armorika, but even the

Catholic priest, J. F. Shearman, writes that he is forced to give up

the idea that there ever was a real St. Patrick. Thus the name must

be accepted only in its Fatherly sense, and with the fall of the man

Patrick all the miraculous and sudden conversions of the kings, lords,

and commons of Ireland must vanish."(156)

156) Rivers of Life, vol. ii., p. 417.

The Irish Church bishoprics differed from the Romish in that they were

held by hereditary succession, after the custom of ancient nations. All

bishops were married.

Prior to the introduction of the Christian system in Ireland the Sabian

ceremonial had been succeeded by the Druidical, upon which had been

engrafted that of the Culdees, and notwithstanding the fact that the

Romish Church gradually usurped the ecclesiastical functions in Ireland,

the last named people who for ages had been regarded as the depositaries

of the ancient faith and the ancient system of laws, were highly

respected by the people for their sanctity and learning. Many of the

Greek and Roman writers who have dealt with this subject agree in

ascribing to the Druids a high degree of scientific knowledge and

mechanical skill. The principles of justice set forth in their judicial

system, their love of learning, and the standard attained in the

sciences and arts, prove the early people of Ireland to have been equal

if not superior to any of the early historic nations.

In referring to the number and magnitude of the monumental remains in

Ireland, and while commenting on the mechanical skill of the Druids, the

Rev. Smedley says:

"I was present at the erection of the Luxor Obelisk in Paris, and yet

I think that I would have felt greater emotion if I had witnessed the

successful performance of the old Celtic engineer who placed on its

three pedestals of stone the enormous rock which constitutes the

Druidical altar here at Castle May."

It is believed that this people understood the art of mining and that

they were acquainted with the use of iron. The following is an extract

from one of Hamilton's letters on the Antrim coast:

"About the year 1770 the miners, in pushing forward an adit toward

the bed of coal, at an unexplored part of the Ballycastle cliff,

unexpectedly broke through the rock into a narrow passage, so much

contracted and choked up with various drippings and deposits on its

sides and bottom, as rendered it impossible for any of the workmen

to force through, that they might examine it farther. Two lads were,

therefore, made to creep in with candles, for the purpose of exploring

this subterranean avenue. They accordingly pressed forward for a

considerable time, with much labor and difficulty, and at length entered

into an extensive labyrinth branching off into numerous apartments,

in the mazes and windings of which they were completely bewildered

and lost. After various vain attempts to return, their lights were

extinguished, their voices became hoarse, and, becoming wearied and

spiritless, they sat down together, in utter despair of an escape from

this miserable dungeon. In the meanwhile, the workmen in the adit became

alarmed for their safety, fresh hands were incessantly employed, and, in

the course of twenty-four hours, the passage was so open as to admit the

most active among the miners... On examining this subterranean wonder,

it was found to be a complete gallery, which had been driven forward

many hundred yards to the bed of coal: that it branched off into

numerous chambers, where miners had carried on their different works:

that these chambers were dressed in a workmanlike manner: that pillars

were left at proper intervals to support the roof. In short it was found

to be an extensive mine, wrought by people at least as expert in the

business as the present generation. Some remains of the tools, and even

of the baskets used in the works, were discovered, but in such a decayed

state that, on being touched, they immediately crumbled to pieces. From

the remains which were found, there is reason to believe that the people

who wrought these collieries anciently, were acquainted with the use of

iron, some small pieces of which were found; it appeared as if some of

their instruments had been thinly shod with that metal."

Through various means the fact has been ascertained that although in

the sixth century the buildings in Ireland were mean and wholly

without artistic merit or skilful design, in an earlier age they were

magnificent. Of the causes which produced the decay of architecture, the

extinction of the arts and sciences, and the general degradation of the

people of this island the devotees of St. Paul and of the Romish Church

are alike silent.

For ages after the subjection of Ireland, in open defiance of the

English, the people continued to dispense justice, and to enforce the

old Brehon laws of the country.

The lack of regard shown for English law in Ireland, even as late as the

sixteenth century, is set forth by Baron Fingles, who wrote in the time

of Henry VIII. He says:

"It is a great abuse and reproach that the laws and statutes made in

this land are not observed nor kept after the making of them eight days,

while diverse Irishmen cloth abuse and keep such laws and statutes which

they make upon hills in this country, firm and stable, without breaking

them for any favor or reward."

By a statute of Parliament enacted at Kilkenny, it was made high treason

to administer or observe these old Brehon laws. The two enactments

especially obnoxious to the English were Gahail Cinne, and Eiric. The

former of these enactments was that which in opposition to the English

law of primogeniture declared that the estate of a parent should descend

in equal proportion to all members of the family. There was another law,

or custom, among this people, which provided that the chief of the tribe

or people should be elected by general suffrage.

We have something more than a hint of the condition of ancient Ireland

and its people in a description given by the Greeks of one of its

inhabitants. Abarras, who visited Greece about six hundred years before

Christ, and who was called by the Greeks a Hyperborean, was a priest of

the Sun, who went abroad for the purpose of study and observation, and

to renew by his presence and his gifts the old friendship which had

long existed between the Celts and the Greeks. Strabo remarks concerning

Abarras that he was much admired by the learned men of Greece. Himerius

says of him that he came

"not clad in skins like a Scythian, but with a bow in his hand, and a

quiver on his shoulders and a plaid wrapped about his body, a gilded

belt encircled his loins, and trousers reaching from his waist downward

to the soles of his feet. He was easy in his address, agreeable in

conversation, active in dispatch and secret in the management of great

affairs; quick in judging of present occurrences, and ready to take his

part in any sudden emergency; provident, withal, in guarding against

futurity; diligent in quest of wisdom, fond of friendship; trusting

very little to fortune; yet having the entire confidence of others, and

trusted with everything for his prudence. He spoke Greek with so much

fluency that you would have thought that he had been bred or brought up

in the Lyceum and had conversed all his life with the Academy of Athens.

He had frequent intercourse with Pythagoras whom he astonished by the

variety and extent of his knowledge."

From the descriptions given of the native country of Abarras by the

Greeks, it is evident that it could have been none other than Ireland.

Although at this time in their history, Apollo the sun-god was the Deity

worshipped in Greece and in Ireland, still both nations honored Latona

his mother. The same as in the mother country (Persia, or Phoenicia),

the oracles, or sybils of Ireland, had prophesied a "Savior," and three

hundred years before Greek emissaries visited that country, its people,

through the preaching of Eastern missionaries, had substituted for the

worship of Latona and Apollo that of the new solar incarnation--the

third son of Zarathustra, whose appearance had been heralded by a star.

The identity of the symbols used by the early people of Ireland who were

sun worshippers, and those employed in that country for ages after

the Romish Church had usurped the ecclesiastical authority, has been

a subject for much comment. After describing the peculiar form of the

early Christian Churches and the attention paid to the placing of

the windows which were to admit the sun's rays, Smedley says: "It

is possible, in an age of allegory and figures, this combination and

variety expressed some sacred meaning with which we are unacquainted at

present."

The similarity observed in the sacred festivals and religious seasons

of the ancient inhabitants of Ireland and those of the early Christians,

the extent to which large stone crosses, lighted candles, the yule log

and the various other symbols belonging to fertility, or sun worship,

were retained by Christianity, furnish strong evidence of the fact that

the latter system is but part and parcel of the former.

The God-Idea of the Ancients; Or, Sex in Religion · 第 15 / 18 章