PART IV.

_All's well that ends well._

FIRST SCENE.--A hospital. _Ferdinand_ and _Joe_ lying in cots and attended

by nurses. _Ferdinand_ signals to _Joe_ and they leap out of bed, gag the

nurses and tie them up with towels. Then they make a rope of bedclothes and

climb out of the window.

SECOND SCENE.--Outside the hospital. _Ferdinand_, in pyjamas, is seen

sliding rapidly down the rope. _Joe_ follows. The rope breaks and he falls

with a crash to the ground.

THIRD SCENE.--A field, with an aeroplane attended by mechanics standing in

it. Enter _Ferdinand_ and _Joe_ running. They climb into the machine, the

motor is started and they shoot out of the picture.

FOURTH SCENE.--The sky. An aeroplane flying very high and very fast.

FIFTH SCENE.--A forest. _Phyllis_ is tied to a tree and three Red Indians

are about to run her through with spears. Suddenly they look upwards as if

disturbed by some noise. At this moment _Ferdinand_ drops to the ground

from the top of the picture. He at once shoots the Indians and releases

_Phyllis_. The latter points dramatically to the right and produces a

paper. Projection on screen:--

-------------------------------

| 30,000 men will relieve you |

| to-morrow!--_Conolly._ |

-------------------------------

_Ferdinand_ and _Phyllis_ both point dramatically to the right.

SIXTH SCENE.--Outside the _General's_ tent. Soldiers and Staff Officers as

before. Enter _Ferdinand_ and _Phyllis_. _Ferdinand_ hands the despatch to

the _General_. Despatch is again projected on the screen. The _General_

rises and salutes with much emotion. All present salute, _Ferdinand_ clasps

_Phyllis_ in his arms to kiss her.

SEVENTH SCENE.--The Kiss--about twenty-five times life-size.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Mistress_ (_discussing housemaid who has given notice_).

"WELL, OF COURSE, IF SHE WANTS TO GO SHE MUST. BUT IT SEEMS FOOLISH OF HER

IF HER ONLY REASON IS THAT SHE WANTS A CHANGE. SHE WON'T GET A BETTER PLACE

THAN THIS."

_Cook._ "THAT'S JUST WHAT I TELL THE SILLY GIRL, MA'AM. 'DEPEND UPON IT,' I

SAYS TO HER, 'YOU'LL ONLY BE GOING OUT OF THE FRYING-PAN INTO THE FIRE.'"]

* * * * *

"Mr. G. Dyson, who succeeded Mr. W. S. Bambridge as organist at the

college a little over two years ago, is leaving to go to Rugby, as

organist there. Since he has been at Marlborough Mr. Dyson has given a

large number of much-appreciated recitals in the college chapel. The

organ is still undergoing repair."--_The Standard._

We make no comment. This is Rugby's affair, not ours.

* * * * *

[Illustration: DESPERATE REMEDIES.

COLONEL HERBERT H. ASQUITH (_to Colonel ANDREW B. LAW, on observing that he

also has taken a leaf out of Lord CLAUD HAMILTON'S book_). "GUESS YOU WON'T

CUT ANY ICE, BONAR, UNLESS YOU SHAVE THAT MOUSTACHE OFF."]

* * * * *

ESSENCE OF PARLIAMENT.

(EXTRACTED FROM THE DIARY OF TOBY, M.P.)

_House of Commons, Monday, February 16._--WORTHINGTON EVANS charmed House

to-day by one of those little delicacies of feeling and taste favoured in

the assembly. MASTERMAN has met the reward of conspicuous success at the

Treasury by promotion to Cabinet rank. In his absence his place temporarily

taken at Question Time by WEDGWOOD BENN, who, while careful to deprecate

personal responsibility for promise to give 9_d._ for 4_d._, displayed

remarkable intimacy with intricacies of the Insurance Act. WORTHINGTON

EVANS, having as usual, after the leisure of a week-end, provided himself

with collection of conundrums based on its working, knew that when he came

down to-day he would find MASTERMAN'S seat empty.

Marked the occasion by presenting himself in mourning array--not the

profoundest black such as _Hamlet_ upon occasion affected, but a prevalence

of decorous colour provided in what is known in drapers' shops as "The

Mitigated Affliction Department." An uncompromising black tie was a

determining note in his attire, testifying to sincere regret at parting

from a Minister whom for three Sessions he has, so to speak, riddled with

conundrums.

Insurance Act has suddenly again sprung into prominence. By odd accident

revival is coincident with couple of by-elections going forward in

Metropolis. JOYNSON-HICKS much struck by circumstance that announcement of

scheme under the Act dealing with casual labour at the docks is promulgated

just now, when election is proceeding in a constituency where there happen

to be many docks and a multitude of casual labourers who have votes.

BONNER LAW, when he comes to think of it, equally surprised. Would the

CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER oblige by explaining? As for LORD BOB CECIL, he

is so perturbed that he momentarily forgets he has leading question to

address to PREMIER designed to extract secret intention with respect to

amending Home Rule Bill.

LLOYD GEORGE, always ready to oblige, explains that scheme in question was

prepared last Autumn, had frequently been referred to by MASTERMAN whilst

still at the Treasury.

"I am sure," he added, with twinkle in his eye, "we owe a debt of gratitude

to Mr. JOYNSON-HICKS for calling further attention to the matter at this

particular moment."

Opposition not to be put off by badinage. Discover in apparently innocent

accident evidence of that deep-seated tendency to import bribery and

corruption into by-elections of which one of the Whips was this afternoon

made a terrible example.

Above and below Gangway Members popped up desiring to put further

questions. Too much even for patience of SPEAKER. Suggested matter had

better be raised upon debate.

"Why, cert'nly," said JOYNSON-HICKS.

[Illustration: Lord ROBERT CECIL is "perturbed."]

Accordingly, when at eleven o'clock debate on Address automatically stood

adjourned, and Members were anxious to get home, the JOCUND JOYNSON turned

up, and we had it all over again for space of half-an-hour.

_Business done._--ORMSBY-GORE moved amendment expressing regret that, in

spite of all they had heard to its detriment in Lords and Commons,

Government intend to proceed with Welsh Church Disestablishment Bill. On

division amendment negatived by 279 votes against 217. Reduction of normal

Ministerial majority hailed with delight on Opposition benches.

_House of Lords, Tuesday._--"What's this?" SARK asked, looking in at

half-past four and finding House crowded with throng of strangers blocking

approaches. "Is it the Land or the Church?"

"Neither," said MARCHAMLEY; "it's Marconi."

"Ah," said SARK, as if that explained everything.

On paper stood motion in name of AMPTHILL for appointment of Select

Committee to enquire into relation of Lord MURRAY with Marconi business.

The name, more blessed than Mesopotamia, stirred glad Opposition to

profoundest depths. Thought it over and done with; and here it was again,

blooming like the aloe, though after briefer interval. Excitement broke

through ordinarily ice-bound calm of the House.

Opposition benches crowded to fullest capacity. Privy Councillors and sons

of Peers jostled each other on steps of Throne. Peeresses flocked down by

the score. Curious effect of latest fashion in headgear displayed in side

galleries. Nearly every bonnet--or were they hats?--was loftily plumed with

black feathers, ominously familiar on hearses. It seemed as if the ladies

had come to bury Cæsar (of Elibank), not to praise or even condemn him.

MURRAY, arriving early, passed the Front Bench, where as ex-Minister he had

a right to sit. Found a place immediately behind in friendly contiguity to

former colleagues, Lord CREWE and Lord MORLEY. On stroke of half-past four

he rose and, producing sheaf of manuscript, began to read. In low voice,

with slow intonation, he turned over page after page, each scored with

acknowledgment of contrition and regret for mistakes made. He pleaded that

"my error, such as it was, was an error of judgment, not of intention." As

to purchase of American Marconi shares on behalf of the Liberal Party, "I

have," he said, "myself assumed the burden by taking over these shares at

the price paid for them at the date of purchase, and, as the House will

appreciate, at very considerable personal loss."

Throughout ten minutes he was on his legs MURRAY, in unconscious sympathy

with the hearse plumes that nodded over him from the side gallery at his

back, spoke in funereal note. In the Commons so frank a confession, so

ample an apology, would have been accepted with burst of general cheering.

Shrewd Members know that an assured method of gaining temporary popularity

is to commit a breach of order and take early opportunity of withdrawing

anything offensive that may have been said, apologising for anything

unseemly that may have been done. When, for example, RONALD M'NEILL

apologised for having chucked at the head of the FIRST LORD OF THE

ADMIRALTY a book containing rules for preservation of order in debate, he

was almost rapturously cheered.

Chilliness of the graveyard froze round MURRAY as he read carefully

prepared statement. When he sat down, faint murmur of applause rose from

scanty muster on Liberal side. No sound, whether of approval or

disapproval, broke the stillness of the serried benches opposite.

Effect contagious. LANSDOWNE almost inaudible. CREWE quite so. Strangers at

back of gallery, hearing no voice and seeing the Noble Lord standing at the

table nervously wringing his hands and twiddling his fingers, thought he

was conversing with the LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION by means of the deaf and

dumb alphabet.

AMPTHILL above these evidences of human weakness. LANSDOWNE in

characteristically chivalrous manner suggested that motion for Committee

should be withdrawn, affording opportunity to Noble Lords to consider

MURRAY'S statement and the best course to be taken upon it. AMPTHILL not

allured by such considerations. As he shrewdly remarked, if he consented to

withdraw his motion it could not be revived. All he would consent to was

not to insist upon proceeding with business at to-day's sitting. Stipulated

that his opportunity should not be hampered by "unavoidable delay."

On this understanding House adjourned, hoarse plumes in side galleries

forlornly nodding themselves out.

_Business done._--LLOYD GEORGE at bay in the Commons. His famous Budget

attacked afresh on motion of Amendment to Address. ANANIAS and SAPPHIRA

personally mentioned in course of debate. Amendment negatived by 301 votes

against 213.

_Thursday._--Upon inquiry and reflection LANSDOWNE discovered that in

matter of proposed Marconi Committee AMPTHILL is in fuller accord with

opinion of majority on his side of House than himself. Accordingly, adopts

AMPTHILL'S motion and moves it. CREWE offering no opposition, Committee

appointed without division.

In Commons, just after 11 o'clock, news came of defeat of MASTERMAN in

Bethnal Green. Turns out there was more in WORTHINGTON EVANS'S assumption

of "the inky cloak, good mother" than on Monday met the eye. Boisterous

scene of exultation in Unionist camp, jubilant cries of "Resign, Resign."

"Resign!" growled SARK. "Why should WILSON resign a seat just won? It is

true it was in a three-cornered fight, and by a majority of twenty-four he

represents minority of electors. But the seat is his, and of course he'll

keep it."

Curious how obtuse SARK can be upon occasion.

_Business done._--Debate on Address agreed to in Commons. Forthwith set to

on Estimates. Work cut out till 31st March. After that Home Rule and the

Deluge.

* * * * *

[Illustration: THE MAN FROM BOGOTA.

Lord MURRAY OF ELIBANK (talking); Lord MOBLEY OF BLACKBURN (thinking).]

* * * * *

"ON SHROVE TUESDAY, FEB. 24,

COOK'S FAST DAY EXCURSIONS TO BIRMINGHAM"

_Midland Railway Leaflet._

The rest of us take our first "fast day," as usual, on Ash Wednesday.

* * * * *

THE CANAL.

[_An attempt to express in futuristic "verse" the emotions aroused by

a futuristic painting bearing the above title._]

Mud, sedimentary, coffee-colour,

And here a wedge, a sharp, keen, thrustful triangularity,

And squares that writhe in painful green,

Calling, clamouring--O venerable shade of EUCLID.

Back in the ages, dusty, maculated,

Across the slate-hued fogs of time,

Behold them!--oblongs of sliding water

And cubed banks,

Bridges and barges, blatantly, wonderfully, inconceivably angular,

Calling, clamouring--canal, canal, canal!

Out on the sea, restive and sloppy,

A waste of salinity,

So they aver,

There are ships with masts, sails, halyards,

Spankers, booms and things;

There are lobsters and jellyfish--not here.

Nothing here but illimitable mysteries,

Baffling unknowledgeableness,

Fathomless, fainting from square to square,

Oblongs and nosey triangles, ever so nosey,

Shapes rhomboidal, perchance rhombohedral--who knows?

Puce and mustard-tinted--delicate,

Oh, most delicate the mustard!--

And russet, cadaverous pink,

They mingle, compaginate,

And their voices mingle,

They call me out of the frame,

They call,

Thinly and crazily,

Canal, canal, canal--slimy, crawly-crawly water!

* * * * *

"LITERARY.

FREE.--Our 160-page book, 'Hints for Home Decorators,' will be sent

free on receipt of 1-1/2d. for postage. Full instructions on painting,

staining, graining, varnishing, enamelling, stencilling, gilding,

colour-washing, how to mix paints, colours, inks, dyes, and scores of

valuable recipes."

_Daily Citizen._

Now we know where our novelists get their local colour.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Rector_ (_thanking all who have contributed to the success

of the bazaar_). "AND AS FOR LADY BLANK, I SHOULD NOT LIKE TO TELL YOU WHAT

_SHE_ HAS DONE."]

* * * * *

THE DEADLY BUTTON.

We do not know whether the following incident occurred at Signor BEN

TROVATO'S famous restaurant on Fifth Avenue or not, but feel impelled, at

any rate, to quote it as a warning, on the authority of _The Globe_ of

February 19th, and _The New York American_:--

"Giving a well-satisfied sigh after dinner a Pittsburg man burst a button

off his waistcoat. It split in two. One half hit another man, with whom he

was dining, in the eye. As a result his _vis-á-vis_ may lose the sight of

his eye. The other half struck the convivo in the cheek, cutting the

flesh."

This new and hitherto unsuspected possibility in ballistics must be rightly

directed and also guarded against. There will be danger from the opposite

side of the table at City dinners at about the tenth course and onwards,

unless the wary guest can screen himself from the Corporation behind a

laager of fruit-dishes and substantial ornaments.

If two gourmets fall out over the respective merits of their favourite

_entremets_, the remedy is now easy. There is the duel by button. Each of

the principals, seconded by his particular waiter, after carefully taking

his opponent's range and bearings, will suspire and hit him in the eye. The

more replete combatant, having the greater equatorial velocity, will

probably win, but the tailor can do a good deal towards securing a flat

trajectory and freedom from swerve.

At Christmas dinners, Tommy, when adequately charged, can challenge a rival

amateur of plum-pudding to a rally over the dessert, instead of expending

his horse-power over crackers. A little training, of course, would be

needed to secure a combine fusillade.

It is only right to add that evening-dress waistcoats are henceforward to

come under those sections of the Geneva Convention which relate to missiles

and explosives. No soft-nosed buttons, or studs which are liable to

"bunch," are to be allowed. A special regulation further requires that

persons more than fifty inches in circumference, and fire-eaters who have

already marked their men, shall dine by themselves, or at any rate only at

a high table where there is no _vis-á-vis_. And page-boys are to be

compelled to use hooks-and-eyes, unless they are engaged for a wedding or

funeral salvo.

ZIG-ZAG.

* * * * *

The Plural Voter.

"At the Wilmot-street Schools ... the credit of being first fell to a

well-known resident--a stone-mason by craft.... There was no mistaking

the colour of his political opinions. He voted for Major Sir Mathew

Wilson."--_Evening News._

"'I am going to be the first man in England who ever voted at 7 a.m.,'

said an enthusiastic workman at the Wilmot-street Station as he fell

in with the opening of the front door. He voted for

Masterman."--_Star._

* * * * *

A message recently sent to a New Zealand chemist:

"Please give the little girl a plaster for a man that a piece of wood

blew off a shed and hit him in the rib."

* * * * *

"BAY GELDING, 5 years, 16 h.p., up to 13 stone; hunted up to date;

good performer and temperate; quiet with road nuisances; 30 gs."

Thirty guineas for a 16 horse-power horse is absurd.

* * * * *

AT THE PLAY.

"HELEN WITH THE HIGH HAND."

There is great entertainment at the Vaudeville for the admirers of Mr.

NORMAN MCKINNEL, among whom I propose to count myself whenever, as so

rarely happens, he takes an evening off from his tyrannical methods--seldom

very edifying when a woman is the victim. As the gentleman says in one of

OSCAR WENDELL HOLMES'S books, "_Quoiqu'elle soit très solidement montée, it

ne faut pas brutaliser la machine_." Here it is true that Mr. MCKINNEL

started out on his familiar courses, but he soon found that he had to do

with his match; that _Helen's_ hand was always a little higher than his

own. And, even when we saw him at his most dogmatic, the fact that the

question of sex, in its physical aspects, did not enter into their

relations--he was only her step-great-uncle--saved us from a great deal of

uneasiness. In all his moods, whether of blustering self-assertion or

reluctant surrender, of canny craft or protesting generosity, Mr. MCKINNEL

was equally admirable.

[Illustration: THE HIGH HAND.

_Helen Rathbone_ Miss NANCY PRICE.

_James Ollerenshaw_ Mr. NORMAN MCKINNEL.]

The local atmosphere of the Five Towns was established with less delay over

detail than is customary in this kind. There was a lot of tea-drinking, I

admit, but no doubt this beverage plays a strong part in the social life of

the Potteries. There was also much handling of domestic provisions--streaky

bacon, cheese, and so forth--but all this was proper enough in a play that

largely turned upon the changes in an old celibate's _ménage_. But in the

main it was a comedy of character, a struggle between youth and crabbed

age, in which the younger will and the quicker wit prevailed. As we first

see him, _James Ollerenshaw_ is a crusty, browbeating, misogynist, hoarding

his wealth, content with a mean habit of life, and convinced that nobody

can get the better of him. As we see him at the end he is a tamed man,

dependent on female protection against the wiles of a designing widow, and

established, at great cost, with his niece in the noble and ancient mansion

of her desire. There were subsidiary love-episodes, of course, but these,

though novel in some particulars, were relatively perfunctory. The

character of _James Ollerenshaw_ was the real matter of resistance.

Miss NANCY PRICE'S _Helen_ was a very probable performance. For myself I

found her a little too minx-eyed for my taste, but no doubt this was part

of the right Pottery touch. Minor characters were all brightly played, Miss

MIÉLE MAUND being particularly happy as a garrulous young girl in the first

flush of an engagement, who subsequently throws over her violent _fiancé_

on the ground that "she could never marry a man who pushes people into

lakes." Even the _vieux jeu_ of the designing widow took on a certain

freshness in the robust bands of Miss ROSINA FILIPPI.

[Illustration: MODES FROM "THE POTTERIES."

What Mr. ARNOLD BENNETT'S ladies wear to-day Vienna wears to-morrow.

_Lilian Swetnam_ Miss MIÈLE MAUND.]

I am in the fortunate position of having yet to read Mr. ARNOLD BENNETT'S

novel, from which Mr. PRYCE'S comedy has been adapted, and am therefore

free to treat the play itself on what I take to be its merits. It may be

that the adapter assumed in us a little previous knowledge of the history

of _Helen's_ love affair, or that at least there was an obscurity about her

past that wanted clearing up by retrospective illumination; but that is my

only possible criticism; and I heartily congratulate the Vaudeville

management on having at last discovered a play that promises to reward

their enterprise.

Not suspecting that there would be a change of hours after the second

night, I arrived on the third night punctually at 8, to find that the

performance was announced to begin at 8.30. Punctually at that hour I

returned, to find that it did not commence till 9; that in the meantime I

was to assist at a song-and-talk recital of which no threat had been

published. My quarrel is not with Mr. FREDERIC NORTON who did it, though

his clever entertainment began with some songs about fishes and things that

might have warmed a Penny Readings' audience but left me bitterly cold. My

complaint is of a wasted hour and a bolted dinner. I mention it only to

prove that, whatever the provocation he has suffered, a Dramatic Critic is

incapable of prejudice.

O. S.

* * * * *

Another Impending Apology.

"ALBANIA'S NEW RULER

HOW PRINCE WILLIAM WILL ENTER HIS KINGDOM.

+FOUR+"

_Westminster Gazette._

Looping the loop on all fours?

* * * * *

"Shooting on the river Doe, in Kirkcudbrightshire, Colonel Kennaway,

Greenlaw, shot a fine specimen of the male gadwall, a comparatively

rare visitor."--_Glasgow Herald._

Col. KENNAWAY (_to deceased male gadwall_). "That'll teach you to be so

beastly rare."

* * * * *

"The Wigan County Licensing Sessions were held yesterday.

Superintendent Kelly stated that fifty-four persons had been proceeded

against for drunkenness, an increase of 124 over last

year."--_Liverpool Daily Post._

Superintendent KELLY should join the Government.

* * * * *

"A recital was given yesterday afternoon by Dr. Walter Alcock, who

bears the title of organist and composer to His Majesty's Chapels

Royal, and assistant organist of Westminster Abbey, and happens to be

also an organist of exceptional attainments."

_Yorkshire Post._

The luck of Royalty is proverbial.

* * * * *

"WELSH PROFESSIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP.

Milward, after compiling a break of 73, failed at a very easy shot,

otherwise the contribution might have been higher."

_Sportsman._

It would seem certain, but--you never can tell with these wily Welshmen.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Wealthy Visitor._ "_YOU_ 'ARD UP! WOT DO _YOU_ DO TO MAKE

YOU 'ARD UP? I NEVER 'EAR OF YOU GETTIN' A CAR FOR £2,000 AS _I_'VE JUST

DONE, OR BUYIN' YOUR WIFE £3,000 WORTH O' JOOLREY AS _I_ DID LAST WEEK, OR

SENDIN' YOUR BOY A 'UNDED POUNDS-WORTH O' MECHANICAL TOYS AS _I_ 'AVE THIS

MORNIN'. YOU'VE 'AD BREAD AND CHEESE AND _I_'VE STOOD SIX JOLLY FELLERS A

CHAMPAGNE LUNCH--'OW CAN _YOU_ BE 'ARD UP?"]

* * * * *

THE DANGER SIGNAL.

["I think moods and colours are related to one another. For instance,

you have to feel very happy and well to enjoy rose-pink."

_Miss GLADYS COOPER._]

Dear, did the afternoon seem dull and dreary?

Sweet, did you murmur as the tears fell thick--

"My true love cometh not and I am weary;

This is a dirty trick"?

Hear my excuse. With laudable precision

I reached our rendezvous full early, but

When you appeared in view, a rose-pink vision,

I really had to cut.

For oh! your costume made me apprehensive;

That colour-scheme which caused my eyes to blink

Proved you in joyous vein, while I was pensive

And in no mood for pink.

I wanted converse with the gentle lily

And not the rose with all its flaunting show,

Someone to stroke my hand and call me "Willie"

In accents soft and low.

If we had met, your gaiety had grieved me;

There had been bitter back-chat to and fro;

And so I stole away ere you perceived me;

Dear, it was better so.

* * * * *

For all Tastes.

"Number of births on the 28th instant 16; number of rats trapped on

the 29th instant 273."--_The Said Gazette._

* * * * *

THE EXPERT IN EXCELSIS.

The invitation to Mr. ARTHUR BROCK, the well-known pyrotechnist, to express

his opinion of STRAVINSKY'S orchestral fantasia, "Fireworks," on the

occasion of its second performance at Queen's Hall on the 28th inst., has,

we are delighted to learn, been fruitful of a series of similar

invitations, not only in the sphere of music but also in the domain of art

and letters.

Thus we understand that the place of the ordinary musical critic of _The

Times_ will be taken at the next performance of _Parsifal_ by Mr. WATERER,

the great floricultural expert, and Mr. DEVANT, the eminent conjurer, with

a view to their contributing their impressions of the flower maidens and

the methods of the magician _Klingsor_ respectively.

Similarly, on the occasion of the next representation of WAGNER'S _Flying

Dutchman_ at Covent Garden, a signed criticism by the Chief Locomotive

Superintendent of the Great Western Railway will appear in the pages of our

contemporary.

The practice, which it is hoped will lend additional brightness to the

vivacious criticisms of _The Times_, is not to be confined to Opera. The

ASTRONOMER-ROYAL will be asked to record his impressions of BEETHOVEN'S

"Moonlight Sonata", and the officials of our leading lightships will be

asked to report upon PARRY'S "Blest Pair of Sirens."

The application of the new method to literature promises to be equally

interesting. It is an open secret that Messrs. GUNTER have been permanently

retained by _The Pastry-cook's Gazette_ to review all books dealing with

the Glacial Epoch, Ice-action and Arctic Exploration.

* * * * *

A CHARACTER.

DEAR MR. PUNCH,--Under the title of "A Bygone" you recently published the

tale of a certain estimable butler and his one lapse, during many years'

service, into alcoholism. This reminds me of the shorter and sharper

history of our own James, who came to our Northern home on a Monday

afternoon and left upon the following morning.

For his chief characteristics be referred us, on application, to the

opinion of a (Mrs.) Elizabeth Brown, of "The Cottage," Bamston, near

Maidstone, Kent, who, he said, knew more about him than anybody else, and

would take him back into her service later if need and opportunity arose.

This opinion described him briefly but emphatically as honest, sober and

willing. By way of the usual caution we wrote to this good lady direct and

asked her to be so kind as to elaborate her views to us in confidence. In

reply she wrote that James had been with her for eleven years on and off,

had left her only because she was leaving "The Cottage," would be welcomed

back by her when she settled down again, and meanwhile was very honest,

very sober and very willing. There was that about the handwriting and style

of this letter which made us feel that the writer might not be one of the

old _noblesse_, but was, at any rate, a kindly, sensible and acute old

body, who knew now and always what she was talking about. Moreover it

indicated, but did not actually state, that the man had come to be regarded

in the writer's household with feelings more friendly than those usually

found between employer and employé: always, we thought, a strong

recommendation of an old servant. On the strength of this correspondence we

decided to give him a trial at least.

There was nothing peculiar about his appearance, except the suggestion of a

secret sorrow, which was no business of ours. His willingness was at once

apparent: our house being full for a hunt ball there was plenty of work for

him to do, but even so he found time between tea and dinner to put in a

preliminary polish of the silver, which, he told us, was his chief joy in

life, or rather one of them. Moreover he refused to go to bed until our

return from the ball, timed not to be earlier than 4 A.M., and insisted

that he would sit up for us.

We drove off after dinner without a qualm; for, though my wife declares

that she detected a suspicious smell of spirits as he put the carriage rug

over her, unhappily she did not think to mention this till the next day.

When we got back in the small hours we found that, in accordance with his

promise, he had indeed not gone to bed. There he was unmistakably in the

hall. But he wasn't sitting up.... No.... Rather, he was lying down, back

uppermost.... So much for his sobriety.

We resolved to show no mercy. Having promised to drive Captain Merriman,

one of our guests, to the station to catch the early train to London, I was

myself up betimes to see the sinful James also off the premises. His

sorrow, no longer secret, was very manifest; it was a cold wet morning; it

required some strength of mind to cast the fellow adrift and leave him to

find his own way, with bag and baggage, to oblivion. But I did it.

One does not leave much margin of time on these occasions, and it was not

long afterwards that we followed in the dog-cart; nor had we got far on our

road before we espied the back of James ahead of us--one of the saddest

backs I have ever seen. He had still four miles to go to the station; his

bag was obviously not light; he looked as if he would not get four more

yards without collapsing; no doubt he had had an exhaustive night; finally,

even that stern disciplinarian, Merriman, took pity. So, "Jump up behind,

you old blackguard," I called to him as I drew up alongside, and up he

climbed, cling-to his seedy bag and protesting that this was very much more

than he deserved.

As to his honesty you, Sir, must judge. The police doubted it from the

start, and their experience led them to be sure that the reference was

forged, that there was no "Cottage" and no Elizabeth Brown. No doubt he had

managed to get our letter delivered to him and had forged an answer to

that. On all points they were wrong and James was correct. There was "The

Cottage" all right, very much a cottage; it had been vacated by the tenant,

not voluntarily (who ever said it had?) but by reason of arrears of six

weeks' rent, at 5_s._ 6_d._ per week. The tenant's name was truly Elizabeth

Brown, though she was more commonly known as Old Bess, and she was the one

person to know all about our James, being his wife. And we've no reason to

doubt that she has taken him back into her service and was very glad to do

it too.

In short, I cannot claim that James lied to us in any particular. So much

for his honesty. As far as dishonesty was involved in the matter of the

bag, I am not in a position to complain of that, seeing that it was by my

agency alone that that bag got to the station, and it was at my expense

that our local porter deposited, _inter alia_, my wife's much valued

Georgian tea service and spoons in the London train, just about the time

that the theft of them was being discovered at home. Under the guilty

circumstances I prefer to remain

Your anonymous

CORRESPONDENT.

* * * * *

TO MINKI-POO

(SHUTTING ONE EYE).

I watch you, while the firelight glare

Strews flick'ring fancies round the hall,

Replete, with what exotic fare

No watcher by The Wall

Had ever thought to line himself withal.

And, as I mark the locks that weave

A curtain for your eyes of flame,

I sometimes think if you'd a sleeve

To help you in the game,

You'd find a laugh or two to fill the same.

For She in whose grey eyes there springs

Ruth for the lowliest and the least

Proclaims you heir of countless kings,

An emblem from the East

Of inward beauty in the outward beast.

She says you miss the sidewise roll

Of palanquins in Something-Chang,

Or sigh for little bells that toll

Beside the Si-kiang,

And dream-dogs of your old Celestial gang.

For me, I think that tiny heart

Bears no such Oriental load;

Your dreams concern no Pekoe mart

Nor mandarin's abode,

But some dim purlieu of the Edgware Road.

Well, young pretender, have your fling!

Though Fate forbade you to adorn

The pompous pedigree of Ming,

No particle of scorn

Shall ever fall upon the Briton born!

* * * * *

"It was contended that the captain had been placed in circumstances of

exceptional difficulty. The solicitor for the Board of Trade said that

between six and seven hundred pilgrims from Mecca swarmed on to the

ship at Beyrouth to return to Morocco."

_Westminster Gazette._

Another result of the expiry of the WAGNER copyrights?

* * * * *

"She went out rather quickly by the door, but none of them

laughed."--_From "The Cheerful Christian," by DAVID LYALL, in "The

British Weekly."_

She must try the window next time, and then, if they still won't laugh, the

chimney.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _First Irate Gentleman._ "WHEN I 'ITS A MAN, 'E REMEMBERS

IT."

_Second Irate Gentleman._ "WELL, WHEN I 'ITS ONE, 'E DON'T."]

* * * * *

OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_By Mr. Punch's Staff of Learned Clerks._)

_The Golden Barrier_ (METHUEN) was an affair of sovereigns, and the way of

it was this. _Magdalen Tempest_, the heroine, had been left by her late

father the mistress of many fine houses, and stacks and stacks of money.

She had inherited also a disagreeable but honest butler, an aunt who was

even more disagreeable but not honest, and an agent who was--well, who was

the hero of the book. She had further gathered to herself a crowd of

hangers-on more or less artistic, and all given to requiring small

temporary loans. One of them, however, was a professed social reformer, a

bold bad man of doubtful extraction, who was leagued with the aunt in a

plan to marry _Magdalen_ to himself and secure control of the cash. So

_Magdalen_ gave a Venetian Carnival in her great house, and it came on to

thunder, and she found herself alone in a gondola with the painter

(favourite hanger-on), who attempted, too vigorously, to improve the

shining hour, and it was all rather awkward, when--romantically opportune

arrival of the hero (name of _Denvers_), who flung the painter into the

lake, clasped the heroine in his manly arms, married her and lived

happy----No. That is where you are too hasty. There remained still the

Golden Barrier. For, after an interlude of bliss, back came the intriguing

aunt, the social reformer and all the crowd (save the submerged artist) and

began to accuse _Denvers_ of living on his wife's cheque-book. How it ends

you must find out. If you object that there is very little in all this to

suggest the spirit of fine romance which you have learnt to associate with

the names of AGNES and EGERTON CASTLE, I can only say that (while my rough

synopsis does no justice to some pleasant characterization) I myself

greatly prefer these two writers in their earlier and brocaded mood.

* * * * *

It seems to me that Mr. FRANCIS BRETT-YOUNG has done quite a distinguished

piece of work in _Deep Sea_ (SECKER). I have not cared to miss a paragraph

of it and have certainly carried away an unusually vivid memory of that

unnamed West-country fishing-town which he has so cleverly peopled with his

creatures--with poor, simple, introspective _Jeffrey Kenar_, fisherman that

was, looking at life through the oddly refracting medium of his window of

old glass, and all but seeing visions; comely, bitter _Nesta_, his wife;

simple, loyal _Reuben_, _Jeffrey's_ friend, whose rejection of _Nesta

Kenar's_ overmastering passion turns her love to hate; _Reuben's_ gentle

wife, _Ruth_; and that sleek mortgagee, _Silley_, for whom men like

_Reuben_ toil that he may grow fat, nominally owning their vessels,

actually in heavy bondage to their shrewd exacting masters. There are dark

and deep waters of passion swirling in and out of these simple lives, and

the author, whose method is broadly impressionist rather than meticulously

realistic, contrives cleverly to suggest that what he imagines has in fact

been closely observed. He can make and tell a story and he can marshal

words with a certain magic. The tragedy ends peacefully with the resolution

of the too bitter discord of _Nesta's_ hate in love of the child of the man

she had wrongfully and vainly desired. A book to be read.

* * * * *

Amongst the makers of what might be called, without in this case any

disparagement, the commercial short story, I think I should place Mr. P. G.

WODEHOUSE as easily my favourite. The comfortable anticipation that is

always mine on observing his name on the contents page of a popular

magazine has been renewed by the sight of it attached to a collection of

tales in volume form and called, after the first of them, _The Man

Upstairs_ (METHUEN). You must not expect a detailed criticism. All I can

promise you is that, if you are a Wodehouseite, you will find here the

author at his delightful best. He is winged and doth range. The heroes of

these tales include (I quote from the cover) "a barber, a gardener, a

play-writer, a tramp, a waiter, a golfer, a stockbroker, a butler, a bank

clerk, an assistant master at a private school, a Peer's son and a Knight

of the Round Table." So there you are; and, if you don't see what you want

in the window, you must be hard to please. Personally, I fancy I would give

my vote for the play-writing stories. "_Experientia_," as _Mrs. Micawber's_

late father used to observe, "_does it_"; and here I have the feeling that

the author is upon tried ground. But not one of the collection will bore

you; there is about them all too nice a deftness, too happy a gift of

phrase. I am told by the publishers that the American public fully shares

my approval of this engaging craftsman. It shows their sense. But, if there

is any threat of removing Mr. WODEHOUSE permanently to the other side of

the Atlantic, where already he goes far too much, my guinea shall head any

public subscription to retain him.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Punctilious Burglar._ "SORRY TO DISTURB YOU, GUV'NOR, BUT

_WOULD_ YOU MIND LETTING ME HAVE THE THRIPPENCE FOR YOUR SHARE OF THE

INSURANCE STAMP? THIS IS THE FIRST JOB I'VE HAD THIS WEEK."]

* * * * *

In an extremely able but peculiarly unpleasant book, _The Questing Beast_

(SECKER), I think that Miss IVY LOW makes two serious mistakes. "Tell her,"

writes the heroine to a friend after the first of two irregular love

affairs, "that I thought, 'I am not that kind of girl,' and tell her that

there is no 'sort of girl,' and that life is a sea and human beings must

catch hold of life-buoys to keep them afloat." To this it may be answered,

however, that there _is_ "that kind of girl," and that _Rachel Cohen was_

"that kind of girl," and that it is a kind which deliberately rejects

life-buoys when flung out to them. The second mistake, as it seems to me,

in a novel which is in many ways a very clever piece of realism, is a

strong feminist or, at any rate, anti-masculine bias. Against the cunning

dissection of the character of _Charles Giddey_, a worthless and conceited

egotist, I have no complaint to make. It is one of the best things of its

kind that I have read for a long time. But it seems unlikely, to say the

least, that the heroine, after being deserted by the man she really loves,

should, considering her very erotic and unprincipled temperament, find

complete happiness in the publication of a successful novel and in devotion

to her child. I feel that on a nature like that of _Rachel Cohen_ even

Royalties and Press notices would eventually pall. And in pausing I may

remark that the beast _Glatisant_ cuts a very episodic and unsatisfactory

figure in the _Morte D'Arthur_. Pursued for a short while by _Sir

Palamides_ in his Paynim days, it scarcely comes into the cognisance of

KING ARTHUR'S Court and the Table Round. And I fancy that the circulating

libraries will feel the same about "_The Questing Beast_."

* * * * *

I do not think that I can recall any novel that makes such insistent

demands upon the weather as does Miss JOAN SUTHERLAND'S _Cophetua's Son_

(MILLS AND BOON). The sun, the rain, the wind, the snow--these are from the

first page to the last at their intensest, wildest, brightest, most

furious, and as I closed the book and looked out upon a day of monotonous

drizzle I thanked Heaven for the English climate. But I imagine that Miss

SUTHERLAND was aware that nothing but the most vigorous of climatic

conditions would afford a true background for her hero's tempestuous soul.

_Lucien de Guise_ was unfortunate enough to be the son of a flower-girl,

and I had no idea, until Miss SUTHERLAND made it plain to me, how terrible

his friends and the members of the smartest of London's clubs--"Will's, a

place of great historic interest and brilliant reputation, developing

gradually into one of the most exclusive clubs in London, and very strictly

limited in numbers"--held so ignominious an origin. There is a scene in

Will's where _Colonel Maclean_, "a handsome man and a famous soldier,"

expels _M. de Guise_ "with a perceptible degree of asperity" in his

voice--a scene that does the greatest credit to Miss SUTHERLAND'S

imagination. Indeed, I am afraid that Miss SUTHERLAND'S ambition to write a

really dramatic story has driven her into incredibilities of atmosphere, of

incident, and of character. _M. de Guise_, with his flashing, gleaming

eyes, his love of liqueurs, his passion for smashing the most priceless of

Nankin vases whenever he sees them, is, surveyed under these grey English

skies, an unreal figure, and his world, I am afraid, too brightly coloured

to be convincing.

* * * * *

"RULER wanted for Ireland (N.S.); good wages, permanency to competent,

reliable man.--Full particulars to Box 167, Daily News,

Manchester."--_Daily News._

Don't reply to it, Mr. REDMOND. It is not in your line. It is a printer's

advertisement, merely.

* * * * *

"The accident caused great excitement in the neighbourhood. A large

crowd quickly gathered, and several medical men were hurried to the

sport."--_Manchester Guardian._

Those well-known surgeons, _Mr. Robert Sawyer_ and _Mr. Benjamin Allen_,

enjoyed it most.

* * * * *

"A new French revue, entitled 'C'est Bon' (literally, 'It's Top-hole')

is to be produced on Monday week."--_Evening News._

Or, more roughly, "That's good."

* * * * *

In a catalogue of characters assumed at a Mayoral Fancy Dress Ball we are

informed by _The Birmingham Daily Mail_ that Professor and Mrs.

SONNENSCHEIN figured as "Socrates and Christian Thippe." Poor old pagan

XANTHIPPE! SOCRATES is well avenged.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 146, February 25, 1914 · 第 4 / 4 章