CHAPTER I.

IN TRUST

Ballantyne-Press

BALLANTYNE, HANSON AND CO

EDINBURGH AND LONDON

IN TRUST

_THE STORY OF A LADY AND HER LOVER_

BY

M. O. W. OLIPHANT

AUTHOR OF ‘THE CHRONICLES OF CARLINGFORD’ ETC.

_NEW EDITION_

LONDON

LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO.

1883

_All rights reserved_

CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE

I. FATHER AND DAUGHTER 1

II. THE REST OF THE FAMILY 11

III. THE ‘GAME’ 22

IV. UNDER THE BEECHES 34

V. EXPLANATIONS 47

VI. GOOD-BYE 59

VII. CROSS-EXAMINATION 70

VIII. THE MEADOWLANDS’ PARTY 83

IX. COSMO 94

X. FAMILY COUNSELS 108

XI. PROJECTS OF MARRIAGE 121

XII. MISTRESS AND MAID 134

XIII. HEATHCOTE MOUNTFORD 146

XIV. THE SPECTATOR’S VIEW 160

XV. TAMPERING WITH A LAWYER 171

XVI. GOOD ADVICE 184

XVII. THE ABSOLUTE AND THE COMPARATIVE 198

XVIII. AFTERTHOUGHTS 211

XIX. THE CATASTROPHE 228

XX. THE WILL 239

XXI. WHEN ALL WAS OVER 252

XXII. SOPHISTRY 268

XXIII. HEATHCOTE’S PROPOSAL 279

XXIV. A VISITOR 292

XXV. PACKING UP 307

XXVI. GOING AWAY 318

XXVII. A NEW BEGINNING 331

XXVIII. HEATHCOTE’S CAREER 342

XXIX. CHARLEY INTERFERES 356

XXX. THE RECTOR SATISFIED 370

XXXI. FALLEN FROM HER HIGH ESTATE 383

XXXII. ROSE ON HER DEFENCE 397

XXXIII. THE MAN OF THE PERIOD 414

XXXIV. THE HEIRESS’S TRIAL 422

XXXV. A SIMPLE WOMAN 442

XXXVI. THE LAST 456

IN TRUST.

CHAPTER I.

FATHER AND DAUGHTER.

‘My dear, the case is as plain as noonday; you must give this man up.’

‘The case is not plain to me, father--at least, not in your sense.’

‘Anne, you are very positive and self-opinionated, but you cannot--it is

not possible--set up your judgment against mine on such a point. You, an

inexperienced, prejudiced girl, a rustic with no knowledge of the world!

What do you know about the man? Oh, I allow he is well enough to look

at; he has had the usual amount of education, and so forth; but what do

you _know_ about him? that is what I ask.’

‘Not much, father,’ said Anne, steadily; ‘but I know _him_.’

‘Stuff! you, a girl not much over twenty, know a _man_! Does he tell

you, do you suppose, all the adventures of his life? Does he confess his

sins to you? A young fellow that has been trained at a public school,

that has been at the university, that has knocked about the world--is he

going to confide all that to _you_? He would be unworthy the name of

gentleman if he did.’

‘Would he not be more unworthy the name of gentleman if he had done

things which he could not confide to me?’ said Anne; then reddening

suddenly, she added, ‘And even if it were so, father, if in those days

he had done things unfit for my ears, let him be silent; I will not ask

any questions: I know what he is now.’

‘Oh, stuff, I tell you! stuff and nonsense, child! You know what he is

_now_! Yes, what he is when his best coat is on, when he is going to

church with his hymn-book in his pocket and you on his arm; that is a

very edifying aspect of him; but if you think that is all, or nearly

all----’

Anne was silent. It was not that she was convinced, but that her

indignation took words from her. She could not make any reply to such

calumnies; and this was troublesome to her father, who preferred an

argument to a distinct and unsupported statement. He looked at her for a

moment, baffled, feeling himself cut short in the full flow of

utterance--then picked up the thread again, and resumed:

‘You would be a fool to trust in any man in that unguarded way: and

above all in a lawyer. They are all rogues; it is in them. When did you

ever hear a good word spoken for that class of men? I will not consent

to any such nonsense: and if you act without my consent, you know the

consequence. I will not give your mother’s money to maintain in luxury a

man who is--who will be--never mind! You shall not have it. I will give

it to Rose, as I have the power.’

‘You would not be so unjust,’ said Anne.

‘Unjust! I will do it if you defy me in this way. Rose has always been a

better child to me than you have been; and she shall have the money if

you don’t mind.’

Whoever had looked at Anne Mountford then would not have given much for

the chance of her submission. She said nothing, but her upper lip shut

down upon the lower with an unrelenting, immovable determination. She

would not even add a word to her protest against the possibility of the

injustice with which she had been threatened. She was too proud to

repeat herself; she stood still, unbending, betraying no impatience,

ready to receive with calmness everything that might be said to her, but

firm as the house upon its foundations, or the hills that are called

everlasting. Her father knew something of the character of his eldest

child; he knew very well that no small argument would move her, but

perhaps he was not aware how far beyond his power she was. He looked at

her, however, with a passionate annoyance very different from her calm,

and with something vindictive and almost spiteful in his reddish-grey

eyes. Most likely he had felt himself dashed against the wall of her

strong will before now, and had been exasperated by the calm force of

opposition which he could make no head against.

‘You hear what I say,’ he repeated roughly; ‘if you insist, I shall

exercise the right your mother gave me; I shall alter my will: and the

fortune which is no doubt your chief attraction in this man’s eyes--the

fortune he has been calculating upon--I will give to Rose. You hear what

I say?’

‘Yes,’ said Anne. She bowed her head gravely; no doubt that she

understood him, and equally no doubt that what he said had moved her as

much as a shower of rain might have done, and that she was fully

determined to take her own way.

‘On your own head be it then,’ he cried.

She bowed again, and after waiting for a moment to see if he had

anything further to say to her, went quietly out of the room. It was in

the library of a country house that this interview had taken place--the

commonplace business room of a country gentleman of no very great

pretensions. The walls were lined with bookcases in which there was a

tolerable collection of books, but yet they did not tell for much in the

place. They were furniture like the curtains, which were rather shabby,

and the old Turkey carpet--most respectable furniture, yet a little

neglected, wanting renewal. Mr. Mountford’s writing-table was laden with

papers; he had plenty of business to transact, though not of a strictly

intellectual kind. He was an old man, still handsome in his age, with

picturesque snow-white hair in masses, clearly-cut, fine features, and

keen eyes of that reddish hazel which betokens temper. Those eyes

constantly burned under the somewhat projecting eyebrows. They threw a

sort of angry lurid light on his face. The name of the house was Mount;

it had been in the Mountford family for many generations; but it was not

a beautiful and dignified house any more than he was a fine old English

gentleman. Both the place and the man had traditionary rights to popular

respect, but neither man nor place had enforced this claim by any

individual beauty or excellence. There was no doubt as to the right of

the Mountfords to be ranked among the gentry of the district, as good as

the best, in so far that the family had been settled there for

centuries; but they were of that curiously commonplace strain which is

prevalent enough among the smaller gentry, without any splendour of

wealth to dazzle the beholder, and which rouses in the mind of the

spectator a wonder as to what it is that makes the squire superior to

his neighbours. The Mountfords from father to son had got on through the

world without any particular harm or good, uninteresting, ordinary

people, respectable enough, yet not even very respectable. They were not

rich, they were not able; they had nothing in themselves to distinguish

them from the rest of the world; yet wherever the name of Mountford

appeared, throughout all the southern counties at least, the claims of

its possessor to gentility were founded on his relationship to the

Mountfords of Mount. Most curious of all the triumphs of the

aristocratical principle! Or rather perhaps it is the more human

principle of continuance which is the foundation of this prejudice to

which we are all more or less subject. A family which has lasted, which

has had obstinacy enough to cling to its bit of soil, to its old house,

must have something in it worth respect. This principle, however, tells

in favour of the respectable shopkeeper quite as much as the squire, but

it does not tell in the same way. The Mountfords felt themselves of an

entirely different order from the shopkeeper--why, heaven knows! but

their estimate was accepted by all the world.

Mount had the distinction of being entailed; it was not a large estate

nor a valuable one, and it had been deeply mortgaged when the present

Mr. Mountford, St. John by name, came of age. But he had married an

heiress, who had liberated his acres and added greatly to his social

importance. The first Mrs. Mountford had died early, leaving only one

daughter, and at the same time her entire fortune in the hands of her

husband, to do with it what he pleased. These were the days when public

opinion was very unanimous as to the impropriety and unnecessariness of

female rights of any kind, and everybody applauded Mrs. Mountford for

resisting all conditions, and putting herself and her child unreservedly

in her husband’s hands. He had re-married two years after her death, but

unfortunately had succeeded in obtaining only another girl from

unpropitious fate. His first wife’s daughter was Anne, universally

considered as the natural heiress of the considerable fortune which,

after clearing the estate, had remained of her mother’s money, and which

her father had kept scrupulously ‘in a napkin,’ like the churl in the

parable, neither increasing nor diminishing the store. The other

daughter was Rose. Such was the household at Mount in the days when this

history begins. The reigning Mrs. Mountford was a good sort of easy

woman who did not count for much. She was one of the Codringtons of

Carrisford--a ‘very good family’ of the same class as the Mountfords.

Nothing could be better than the connections on both sides--or duller.

But the girls were different. It is very hard to say why the girls

should have been different--perhaps because the present new wave of life

has distinctly affected the girls more than any other class of society.

At all events, the point was indisputable. Anne perhaps might have taken

after her mother, who was of an entirely new stock, not a kind which had

ever before been ingrafted on the steady-going family tree. She had come

out of a race partly mercantile, partly diplomatic; her grandfather had

been Spanish; it was even suspected that one of her ancestors had been a

Jew. All kinds of out-of-the-way sources had furnished the blood which

had been destined to mix with the slow current in the Mountford veins;

and probably Anne had inherited certain bizarre qualities from this

jumble. But Rose had no such mixed antecedents. There was not a drop of

blood in her veins that did not belong to the county, and it was

difficult to see how she could have ‘taken after’ her sister Anne, as

was sometimes suggested, in respect to peculiarities which had come to

Anne from her mother; but if she did not take after Anne, who _did_ she

take after, as Mrs. Mountford often demanded?

Rose was now eighteen and Anne just over one-and-twenty. They were

considered in the neighbourhood to be attractive girls. A household

possessing two such daughters is naturally supposed to have all the

elements of brightness within it; and perhaps if there had been

brothers the girls would have taken their natural place as harmonisers

and peacemakers. But there were no brothers, and the girls embodied all

the confusing and disturbing influences natural to boys in their own

persons, with certain difficulties appropriate to their natural

character. It is true they did not get into scrapes or into debt; they

were not expelled from school or ‘sent down’ from College. Duns did not

follow them to the paternal door, or roistering companions break the

family peace. But yet Anne and Rose contrived to give as much trouble to

Mr. and Mrs. Mountford as if they had been Jack and Tom. These good

people had lived for about a dozen years in their rural mansion like the

cabbages in the kitchen garden. Nothing had disturbed them. There had

been no call upon their reasoning faculties, no strain upon their

affections: everything had gone on quite tranquilly and comfortably,

with that quiet persistence of well-being which makes trouble seem

impossible. They had even said to themselves with sighs, that to have

only girls was after all good for something. They could not be tormented

as others were, or even as the rector, one of whose boys had gone ‘to

the bad.’ The thing which had been was that which should be. The shocks,

the discoveries, the commotions, which the restless elements involved in

male youth bring with them, could not trouble their quiet existence. So

they consoled themselves, although not without a sigh.

Alas, good people! they had reckoned without their girls. The first

storm that arose in the house was when Anne suddenly discovered that her

governess never detected her false notes when she played, and passed the

mistakes which she made, on purpose to test her, in her grammar. ‘I want

some one who can teach me,’ the girl said. She was only fifteen, but she

had already made a great deal more use of that pernicious faculty of

reading which works so much mischief in the world than Mrs. Mountford

approved. Someone who could teach her! That meant a lady at seventy-five

or a hundred pounds a year, instead of thirty-five, which was what they

had hitherto given. Mrs. Mountford nearly cried over this most

unreasonable demand. Miss Montressor was very nice. She was of a family

which had seen better days, and she was fully conscious of her good

fortune in having gained an entry into a county family. After all, what

did it matter about false notes or mistakes in grammar? It was a

ladylike person that was everything. But when Rose too declared in her

little treble that she wanted somebody who could teach her, Miss

Montressor had to go; and the troubles that followed! To do them

justice, the Squire and his wife did their very best to satisfy these

unreasonable young people. They got a German governess with all kinds of

certificates, who taught Rose to say ‘pon chour;’ they got a French

lady, who commended herself to the best feelings of Mrs. Mountford’s

nature by making her up the sweetest cap, but who taught the girls that

Charles I. was all but rescued from the scaffold by the generous

exertions of a Gascon gentleman of the name of D’Artagnan and three

friends who were devoted to him. Mrs. Mountford herself was much pleased

with this information, but Anne and her father were of a different

opinion. However, it would be too long to follow them minutely through

all these troubles. At seventeen Anne wanted Greek and to ‘go in for’

examinations--which gave a still more complete blow to the prejudices of

the house. ‘The same as a young man!’ It was improper in the highest

degree, almost wicked; Mrs. Mountford did not like to think of it. It

seemed to her, as to some of our ablest critics, that nothing but

illicit longings after evil could make a girl wish to pass examinations

and acquire knowledge. She must want to read the naughty books which are

written in Greek and Latin, and which deprave the minds of young men,

the good woman thought. As for the certificates and honours, they might

be all very well for the governesses of whom Mrs. Mountford had such

melancholy experience; but a young lady of a county family, what did she

want with them? They would be things to be ashamed, not proud of. And on

this point Anne was vanquished. She was allowed to learn Greek with many

forebodings, but not to be examined in her knowledge. However, this

decision was chiefly intended to prevent Rose from following her sister,

as she always did; for to refuse Girton to Rose would have been more

difficult than to neglect Anne’s entreaties. For, though Anne was the

eldest sister, it was Rose who was the princess royal and reigned over

the whole demesne.

This desire of the higher education on the part of Rose, who still said

‘pon chour,’ and was not at all certain that two and two always make

four, would have been enough to keep the house in commotion if there had

not occurred just then one of the family troubles appropriate to girls

after so many that could not be called feminine. It has already been

said that the rector of the parish had a son who had ‘gone to the bad.’

He had two other sons, rocks ahead for the young ladies at Mount. Indeed

these two young men were such obvious dangers that Mrs. Mountford had

taken precautions against them while Rose was still in her cradle. One

was a curate, his father’s probable successor; but as the living was in

Mr. Mountford’s hands, and it was always possible that someone else

might be preferred to Charley, some Mountford connection who had a

nearer claim, that prospect did not count for much. The other was

nothing at all, a young man at Oxford, not yet launched upon life. But

fortunately these young men, though very familiar in the house, were not

handsome nor dangerously attractive, and this peril is one which must

always be encountered in the country, even by people of much higher

pretensions than the Mountfords. The first trouble, however, did not

come from this obvious quarter, though it came through there. It was not

one of the Ashleys; but it was a person still less satisfactory. One of

the curate’s friends arrived suddenly on a visit in the late summer--a

young Mr. Douglas, a barrister, which sounds well enough; but not one of

the Douglasses who have ever been heard of. They did not find this out

for some time, imagining fondly that he belonged, at a distance perhaps,

to the Morton family, or to the house of Queensberry, or at least to

Douglasses in Scotland, of whom it could be said that they were of

Lanarkshire or Selkirkshire or some other county. Indeed, it was not

until the whole household was thrown into commotion by a morning call

from Mr. Douglas, who asked for Mr. Mountford, and boldly demanded from

him the hand of Anne, that it burst upon them that he was a Douglas of

nowhere at all. He had been very well educated, and he was at the bar;

but when he was asked what branch of the Douglasses he belonged to, he

answered ‘None,’ with a smile. ‘I have no relations,’ he said. Relations

can be dispensed with. There is no harm in being without them; but a

family was indispensable, and he belonged to nobody. It was just like

Anne, however, not to care. She did not in the least care, nor did she

see any harm in her lover’s countyless condition. And when Mr. Mountford

politely declined the honour of an alliance with this Mr. Douglas of

nowhere at all, she did not hesitate to say that she entirely disagreed

with her father. This was the state in which things were at the time of

the interview I have recorded. Mr. Mountford was determined, and so was

his daughter. This struggle of wills had taken place before, but never

before had it gone so far. In former cases Anne had given in, or she had

been given in to, the one as much as the other. But now there was no

yielding on one side or the other. The father had declared himself

inexorable; the daughter had said little, but her countenance had said

much. And the threat with which he wound up had introduced an entirely

new element into the discussion. What was to come of it? But that was

what at this moment nobody could venture to say.

In Trust: The Story of a Lady and Her Lover · 第 1 / 36 章