CHAPTER II: EXPLORATION, HISTORY, AND CUSTOMS

The Nile Valley

The River Nile is the element which creates the special characteristics

of Egypt, and differentiates it from other parts of the Sahara Desert.

At its annual overflow this river deposits a rich sediment, which

makes the fertile plains on either side such a contrast to the brown

monotony of the desert. East and west of the Nile valley stretch great

wastes, broken here and there by green oases, and the general scenery

is too uniform to be interesting, the Delta itself presenting a richly

cultivated level plain, interspersed by the lofty dark brown mounds of

ancient cities and villages set in groves of palm-trees.

In Upper Egypt the Nile valley is narrow, and is bounded by mountains

inconsiderable in height, and which never rise into peaks. Sometimes

they approach the river in the form of promontories, and sometimes are

divided by the beds of ancient watercourses. These are sufficiently

picturesque, but otherwise the landscape is not striking. In colour,

however, it is remarkably so. "The bright green of the fields, the

reddish brown or dull green of the great river contrasting with the bare

yellow rocks seen beneath a brilliant sun and deep blue sky, present

views of great beauty."

Racial Origin

The question of the racial origin of the people of ancient Egypt is

one of great complexity. In graves and early cultural remains we find

traces of several races which at remote periods entered the country,

and concerning whom the data are so scanty that it is highly dangerous

to generalize about them. According to Professor Sergi of Rome, the

originator of the theory that a great civilizing stock arose at an early

period on the southern shores of the Mediterranean, the ancient Egyptian

belonged to the eastern branch of this race, along with the Nubians,

Abyssinians, Galla, Masai, and Somali. The evidence of language is

vague, for in this, as in other instances, it may only be cultural.

Another theory is that which would people the Nile valley in early times

with a pygmy race, who were dispossessed and driven out by the immigrant

Mediterraneans. The theory that the Mediterranean people entered Egypt

directly from their original home does not agree with that which would

make a stone-working race populating the country at an early period

emanate from Palestine. It would appear from a consideration of the data

that these were Mediterraneans who had had long practice in working

in stone in a country abounding in that material. These were probably

followed by successive immigrations from the east and from Arabia or its

neighbourhood, whence came a people cognate with the Babylonians and

conversant with their culture, which they had absorbed in a common early

home which cannot now be located. These imposed their Semitic vocabulary

upon the Hamitic syntax of the people they found in the Nile valley.

But although they revolutionized the language, they only partially

succeeded in altering the religion, which remained for the most part

of the Osirian type, blending later with the Horus hawk-worship of the

new-comers. There are not wanting those who think that these immigrants

from Arabia were Hamites, who attained to a high civilization in Western

Arabia, and, pressed on by Semitic hordes from the north, crossed the

Red Sea in vessels and made their first base in Egypt at Berenice.

The dynastic Egyptians, according to this view, are Hamitic, and

not far removed in physical type from the Galla of to-day, but had,

perhaps, some element of the proto-Semitic.[1] They are thought "to have

concentrated themselves in the narrow strip of fertility along the banks

of the Nile." It would indeed be difficult to discern where else they

could have concentrated themselves.

The dynastic history of ancient Egypt extends, at the lowest

computation, over a period of more than three thousand years. In view of

chronological difficulties, it has been found convenient to adopt the

dynastic system of reckoning chosen by Manetho, an Egyptian priest who

lived in the third century before Christ. Manetho divided the history

of Egypt into thirty-one dynasties, of which some twenty-six comprise

the period between Mena's Conquest and the Persian Conquest, while the

others cover the period of Persian, Hellenic, and Latin supremacy. With

the Persian Conquest, however, came the disintegration of the Egyptian

Empire, and at that point purely native history comes to an end.

Though Manetho's dynastic divisions have been adopted by modern

Egyptologists, his chronology is not so well received, though it is

supported by at least one distinguished authority--Professor Flinders

Petrie. The general tendency at the present day is to accept the minimum

chronology which is known as that of the Berlin School, which places

Mena's Conquest at 3400 B.C. and the Twelfth Dynasty about 2000 B.C.,

rather than that of Professor Petrie, which would place these events

at 5500 B.C. and 3400 B.C. respectively. It is customary to group the

various dynasties into three periods--the Old Kingdom, comprising

Dynasties I to VIII; the Middle Kingdom, Dynasties IX to XVIII; and the

New Empire, Dynasties XVIII to XXVI. These divisions, however, do not

imply any break in the course of Egyptian history, but are merely used

for the sake of convenience. The following Table compares the systems

of dating in vogue with students of Egyptian history, according to

Professor Petrie and the Berlin School, as represented by Professor

Breasted:

PETRIE (1906) BERLIN SCHOOL (1906)

B.C. B.C.

I 5510 3400

II 5247

III 4945 2980

IV 4731 2900

V 4454 2750

VI 4206 2625

VII 4003 2475

VIII 3933

IX 3787 2445

X 3687

XI 3502 2160

XII 3459 2000

XIII 3246 1788

XIV 2793

XV 2533

XVI 2249

XVII 1731

XVIII 1580 1580

XIX 1322 1350

XX 1202 1200

XXI 1102 1090

XXII 958 945

XXIII 755 745

XXIV 721 718

XXV 715 712

XXVI 664 663

XXVII 525 525

XXVIII 405

XXIX 399

XXX 378

Egyptian Exploration

Egypt, with its mighty ruins wrapped in silence and mystery, long ago

attracted the curiosity of the traveller, for the traditions of a high

civilization, of its religion, government, and culture, lingered in the

memory of man; and there, from temple, pyramid, palace, and city, he has

sought and gained actual and manifold proofs of the existence of that

ancient kingdom. And not only has its own history thus been unveiled

to the modern world, but intertwined therewith has been traced that of

other nations and powers, among them Persia, Greece, and Rome.

The earliest instance in this country of the collecting of Egyptian

antiques is in 1683, when a valuable stele belonging to the Old

Kingdom was brought from Saqqara and presented to the Ashmolean Museum

at Oxford, while in the eighteenth century some attempt was made at

planning and describing Egyptian ruins, and the identification of some

of the sites with cities mentioned in classical writings. In 1798 a

scientific commission, including artists and archæologists, accompanied

Napoleon's military expedition into Egypt, and much valuable work

was accomplished by these savants, the record of which fills several

volumes of the _Description de l'Egypte_, while the large collection of

antiquities gathered by them, including the famous Rosetta Stone, which

proved the key to the mystery of the Egyptian hieroglyphic writing,

came into British possession in the year 1801. Then, under Mehemet Ali,

Egypt was opened to Europeans, and from this time onward great numbers

of antiquities were taken from the country and found their way into

European collections and museums, especially the British Museum, the

Louvre, and those at Leyden, Berlin, and Turin. The largest collection

of Egyptian objects is that at Cairo.

Early Researches

In 1821 came the decipherment of the Rosetta Stone by Champollion,

and this added a new zest to exploration and collecting. Champollion

himself, together with Rosellini, was sent by the Governments of France

and Tuscany on an expedition to Egypt, and much was done in copying

stelæ and inscriptions. But the Prussian Government initiated a greater

undertaking in 1842, under Lepsius, who extended his researches from

Egypt into Nubia as far as Khartoum, and again into Syria and Palestine.

This expedition, with its scientific methods, yielded a wonderful

harvest of valuable results. The official preservation of the ancient

monuments and ruins against exploitation by dealers or destruction by

vandals was first undertaken by Mehemet Ali, who appointed Mariette to

this onerous post, and under his wise and able direction invaluable

work was accomplished. This has been developed under the British

suzerainty. The ancient sites are claimed by the Government, and the

Service of Antiquities has an annual grant of large dimensions and

employs many European and native officials. All provinces are included

in its survey, and no excavations may take place without its permission;

and this is granted to responsible persons only, and on the terms that

half of the antiquities discovered shall become the property of the

Egyptian Government, the other half going to the finders. Sir Gaston

Maspero, director of the Museum at Cairo, has made many brilliant

contributions to Egyptian archæology. As early as 1862 the Scottish

archæologist, Rhind, saw the necessity for some definite scientific and

comprehensive system of excavation if really valuable results were to

be obtained, and lamented the lack of any such methods in his time.

In 1883 this system of investigation was inaugurated at Tanis under

Professor Flinders Petrie. Everything, large and small, found during the

excavation of city, temple, or grave is collected and interpreted, and

made to yield its quota of evidence and information. This method gives

every object its value. Attention is not concentrated on one department

alone, hence nothing is wasted or lost, and knowledge of the arts and

crafts, the customs, the literature and religion of ancient Egypt is

slowly gathered, and all takes its due place in the pageant of history

unfolded before us.

Much of the mystery that hung over Egypt has departed, but the glamour

and fascination she exerted in the past are still as great as ever.

These are not lessened by our more intimate knowledge of her ancient

civilization, but rather increased a hundredfold. The silence of

centuries has been broken, the hieroglyphs have told their tale to

modern man, who listens with ever-deepening interest to the voice of

the Past. The drifting sand of the desert has been cleared away and

ancient buildings stand again in the sunlight and yield their secrets

veiled for so many centuries. The graves tell over again the unchanging

sorrow of death and the world-old longings of man. Apart from the

literary remains, papyri and inscriptions, the material results have

been immense. The ancient topography of the land has become known by

the remains of roads, canals, quarries, and mines. The sites of towns,

with the temples, fortifications, and private dwellings, have been

comprehensively treated, so that the record is almost complete from the

building of the foundation to the decorative designs of the artists.

The site of each city, again, is generally that of several belonging

to different epochs; the ruins of the older buildings were levelled

to an even surface and the newer one begun several feet higher. The

artificial mounds thus made are sometimes as much as 80 or 90 feet in

height. These foundations did not deter the Egyptian architects from

erecting lofty buildings, such as those in Memphis, for in several

cities walls exist to-day from 30 to 40 feet in height. To support

these they were thickened at the base and the floors vaulted. Amongst

the limestone remains of houses are often found fragments of sandstone,

granite, and alabaster quarried from some ruined temple, which shows

that the Egyptians of those far-away days did exactly the same as their

descendants, and despoiled the neglected and ruined monuments.

Town Planning

The plan of a town excavated shows the houses gathered closely around

the temple and its square enclosure. This served as fortress and refuge

if the town were attacked. The plan was regular in towns that were

built in one period, with wide paved streets running at right angles

and provided with stone channels to carry off water and drainage. The

buildings were arranged in line. In cities that were the product of

centuries there was, however, great irregularity--houses heaped in

mazes of blind alleys, and dark, narrow streets. There was generally

an open space, shaded by sycamores, used two or three times a month

as a market-place. The poorer classes were housed in hovels, rarely

exceeding 12 or 16 feet in length, and little better than the huts

of the fellaheen of to-day. The houses of the middle class, such

as shop-keepers, small officials, and foremen, were of a better

description, though rather small. They usually contained half a dozen

rooms, and some were two or three stories high, while narrow courtyards

separated them from the street, though more often the house fronted

directly on the road and was built on three sides of a courtyard. That

excellent sanitary and hygienic conditions were known in ancient Egypt

has been amply proved, for even poorer houses at Kahûn boasted a stone

tank, and this luxury was universal except among the very poor. At Tell

el Amarna, in the house of a high official of the Eighteenth Dynasty,

an elaborate bath and ingenious system of water-supply have been found.

The arrangements of the ordinary house were much the same as obtain

in the East of to-day, the ground floor including store-rooms, barns,

and stables; the next for living and sleeping; the roof for sleeping

in summer, while here also the women gossiped and cooked. An outside

staircase, narrow and very steep, led to the upper rooms. These were

oblong in shape, and the door was the only means of ventilation and

lighting. For decoration the walls were sometimes whitewashed, or

decorated with red and yellow, or painted with domestic scenes.

Palaces and Mansions

The palaces and mansions of the wealthy and great generally stood in

the midst of a garden or courtyard planted with trees surrounded with

crenellated walls, broken only by a doorway, which often indicated the

social importance of the family. At times it was a portico supported

on columns and adorned with statues; at others, a pylon similar to

those at the entrance of temples. "The interior," says Maspero, "almost

resembled a small town divided into quarters by irregular walls. In some

cases the dwelling-house stood at the farther end; while the granaries,

stables, and domestic offices were distributed in different parts of

the enclosure." Paintings and plans on walls of tombs, the remains of

houses at Tell el Amarna and of the palace of Akhenaten, have supplied

the means by which we learn these details. The pictorial plan of a

Theban house, half palace, half villa, is thus elucidated by Maspero:

"The enclosure is rectangular, surrounded by a crenellated wall. The

principal entrance opens upon a road bordered by trees by the side of

a canal or branch of the Nile. The garden is symmetrically divided by

low stone walls. In the centre is a large trellis supported on four

rows of small columns; to right and left are four pools stocked with

ducks and geese, two leafy conservatories, two summer-houses, and

avenues of sycamores, date-palms, and dôm-palms. At the back, facing

the entrance, is the house, two-storied and of small dimensions,

surmounted by a painted cornice." On one of the tombs of Tell el Amarna

is to be found a representation of the palace of Aï, who later ascended

the throne of Egypt. This is of large size, rectangular in shape, the

façade wider than the sides. The staircases running to the terraced

roof lead into two small chambers at each corner of the back wall. The

dwelling-house itself is contained within this outer building, and was

sacred to the family and its head, and only intimate friends had the

right of entrance. The remains of the ruined palace of Akhenaten at

Tell el Amarna also follows much the same plan, with the addition of

a pavilion for the queen's use, containing a large hall 51 feet by 21

feet. In this palace was another immense hall, its dimensions being 423

feet by 234 feet. It contained 542 mud pillars, 52 inches square. It

communicated with five smaller halls. "The pillars were whitened, and

the ceilings were painted with vine-leaves and bunches of grapes on a

yellow ground." Many of the mansions and houses afford some beautiful

specimens of the decorative art of those days. Remains of the domestic

architecture of the Old Kingdom are not numerous, but the general plan

seems to have been much the same as in the later periods. The small

antiquities discovered, such as utensils, clothes, weapons, amulets,

and other articles which have been found in great numbers, fill in the

picture of the domestic life of ancient Egypt; while temple and fortress

and monument tell of the religion, the warfare, and the enterprise in

that distant epoch.

These excavations cover a large area. Upper, Middle, and Lower Egypt

and Nubia have been extensively explored, likewise the Sinai Peninsula

and Syria, with its numerous tablets of conquest. In Nubia, states

an authority, owing to the poverty of the country and its scanty

population, the proportion of monuments surviving is infinitely greater

than in Egypt. Many temples, tombs, quarries, forts, grottos, and

pyramids have been found in a good state of preservation. In Upper

Egypt are to be found the great pyramids and the necropolis of Memphis,

with various smaller pyramids to the south, and it also boasts of the

stupendous ruins of Thebes on both sides of the river, the tombs and

quarries of Assuan, and the temples of Philæ, though these by no means

exhaust the list of sites which have been excavated, while it is well

known that many still hold mysteries as yet untouched.

Life and Law in Ancient Egypt

The existence of Egypt as a native monarchy stretched over such an

extended period that it is extremely difficult to generalize concerning

the method of its government or the life of its people. At the same

time no civilization with a record of thousands of years behind it

exhibits less change either in political or domestic affairs. It is

certain that once an agricultural mode of life was accepted by the

Egyptians they quickly contracted those manners and customs which they

retained up to the period of foreign invasion; and so far as the lower

classes are concerned, there can be little doubt that the stream of

daily life flowed on from century to century placid and unaltered. The

science of folklore has of late years proved to us how little alteration

the passage of time brings to the life and thought of a people whose

environment is such that outward forces are seldom brought to bear upon

them. Especially was this the case with the inhabitants of the Nile

valley, who for many centuries were sheltered by geographical and other

peculiarities from the inroads of other civilized races, and who by the

time that foreign invaders mingled with them had attained such a settled

course of existence, and were so powerfully influenced by tradition, as

to be practically immune from the effects of racial intermixture. It

must also be borne in mind that such invaders as Egypt knew would not

bring their womankind with them, and that their marriage to Egyptian

women would have the effect in a generation or two of completely

absorbing them into the native population, so that the racial standard

remained practically unaltered. Again, their numbers would be relatively

small compared with the population of Egypt. The environment of the

Nile valley is exceptionally well suited to the continuance of type,

as is evidenced by the persistence of form in its domestic and other

animals. Time and again have foreign sheep, goats, asses, and so forth

been introduced into it, with the result that shortly afterward they

became absorbed into the prevailing Egyptian type of their kind, with

scarcely any modification. The horse and the camel were comparatively

late importations into Egypt, and the tardy introduction of the former

is eloquent of the isolated character of the country.

The feudal system was general throughout ancient Egypt, and the Pharaoh

was chiefly employed in keeping his greater subjects in check. These

modelled their principalities upon the central power, and even such

as had no claim to royal blood kept up establishments of considerable

magnitude. Officials swarmed in the Nile valley, and it does not seem

that they were actuated by a very high standard of political morality,

or, at least in practice, they fell short of it. Members of the royal

family were generally granted high office, and this meant that the

country was in effect administered by an hereditary bureaucracy. A

chancellor or vizier was directly responsible to the monarch for

the condition of the country--its business, finance, and legal

administration.

Commerce

We know but little concerning the commercial affairs of ancient Egypt.

In all probability open-air markets were held. Currency was unknown

until the era of the Persian invasion, and until then rings of gold,

silver, and bronze were employed in exchange. Barter, however, prevailed

universally. Corn was, of course, the staple produce of Egypt, and

seems to have been exported to some extent to other countries, as were

papyrus rolls and linen; but practically all silver and copper had to

be imported, as had precious woods, the pelts of rare animals, ivory,

spices and incense, and stone for the manufacture of rare vessels. Many

of these supplies reached Egypt in the shape of tribute, but records

are extant of expeditions sent out by the king for the purpose of

obtaining foreign rarities. A great deal of Egyptian trade was in the

hands of foreigners. The Phœnicians evidently opened up communication

with Egypt as early as the Third Dynasty. In later times an extensive

trade was carried on with Greece, and Psammetichus I (_c._ 570 B.C.)

founded the town of Naucratis as the centre of Greek trade in Egypt.

Agriculture

Agriculture was the backbone of Egyptian wealth; the nature of the

soil--rich, black mud, deposited by the Nile, which also served to

irrigate it--rendered the practice of farming peculiarly simple. The

intense heat, too, assisted the speedy growth of grain. Cultivation was

possible almost all the year round, but usually terminated with the

harvests gathered in at the end of April, from which month to June a

period of slackness was afforded the farmer. A great variety of crops

was sown, but wheat and barley were the most popular; durra, of which

bread was made, lentils, peas, beans, radishes, lettuces, onions,

and flax were also cultivated. Fruits were represented by the grape,

pomegranate, fig, and date. Timber was scanty and, as has been said,

was mostly imported. In early times it was probably more abundant,

but the introduction of the camel and the goat proved its ruin, these

animals stripping the bark from the trees and devouring the shoots.

Wine was chiefly made in the district of Mareotis, near Alexandria, and

appears to have possessed a very delicate flavour. The papyrus plant was

widely cultivated from the earliest times; the stem was employed for

boat-building and rope-making, as well as for writing materials.

Legal Code

Egyptian law appears to have been traditional, and no remains of any

specific code have come down to us. Royal decrees and regulations

were promulgated from time to time, and these were usually engraved

on stone and carefully preserved. In the Ptolemaic period travelling

courts were instituted, which settled litigation of all descriptions;

but the traditional law of the country appears to have been well known

to the people and fully recognized by their rulers. A favourite way of

having a grievance redressed was to petition the king or one of the

great feudal princes. Courts sitting to hear specific cases were nearly

always composed of royal or territorial persons in early days, and in

later times of officials. The right to appeal to the king existed.

Evidence was given upon oath, a favourite oath being "By the king" or

"By the life of the king." Only occasionally was torture employed for

the purpose of extracting evidence. Penalties were various. In many

instances the accused was allowed to take his own life. For minor crimes

the bastinado or disfigurement by cutting off the nose, banishment or

fine, were the usual punishments. During the Old Kingdom decapitation

was the usual means of inflicting death. The drawing up of contracts was

universal, and these were, as a rule, duly witnessed. From the time of

the Twenty-fifth Dynasty these are discovered in abundance, and usually

refer to sales or loans. Although a woman could inherit property, she

had not the entire right of dealing with it, but, if divorced, her dowry

could not be forfeited. Many of these ancient documents deal with the

buying and selling of slaves. It is not clear, however, whether or not

the consent of a slave was necessary to his sale.

Science

Knowledge and learning of every description were, of course,

subordinated to the religious idea, which was the paramount

consideration in Egyptian life. With architecture we have dealt

elsewhere. It would seem that scientific operations of all sorts were

carried out, not by means of any given formulæ, but merely by rule

of thumb. Wonderful results were obtained by the simplest means, and

the methods by which the pyramids were raised are still somewhat of a

mystery. The dates of festivals were astronomically fixed; and it has

been stated that the pyramids and other large buildings were orientated

in the same manner. The beginning of the inundation of the Nile was

marked by the rising of the star Sothis or Sirius. A great many Egyptian

inventions appear to be of considerable antiquity, but the inventive

faculty of the race would seem to have been stunted or altogether lost

in later times. Attempts at progress were absolutely unknown even when

the Egyptians came into contact with foreigners, and all innovations

were looked upon askance.

The Peasantry

It is uncertain to what extent the people followed the nobility in

the very rigorous religious programme that these had set themselves.

That they were as deeply superstitious as their betters there can be

little doubt; but that they regarded themselves as fit subjects for the

same otherworld to which the aristocracy were bound is unlikely in the

extreme. Probably at the best they thought they might find some corner

in the dark realm of Osiris where they would not be utterly annihilated,

or that at least their _kas_ would be duly fed and nourished by the

offerings made to them by their children. The Egyptian peasant was

pre-eminently a son of the soil, hard-working, patient, and content,

with little in the way of food, shelter, and raiment--not at all unlike

the fellah of the present day. The lot of the Egyptian peasant woman

was, like that of her husband, one of arduous toil. She was usually

married about the age of fifteen, and by the age of thirty was often a

grandmother. The care of her dwelling and children was not, however,

permitted to occupy all her time, for at certain seasons she was

expected to assist her husband in the field, where she probably received

more blows than thanks. Justice was not very even-handed, and redress

for any individual of the peasant class was not easily obtained; it is

strange that the conditions under which the peasantry dwelt did not

foment rebellion. Probably the only reason that such outbreaks did not

take place was that the condition of servitude was too deep and that,

like most Orientals, the Egyptians were fatalists.

Costume

The fashion of apparel differed considerably with the dynasties. As

we have already noted, the Pharaoh possessed a peculiar attire of his

own, upon which that of the upper ranks of society was to some extent

modelled. The climate did not permit or encourage the wearing of heavy

material, so that fine linen was greatly in use. The upper portions

of the body were only partially covered, and amongst the nobility in

ancient times a species of linen skirt was worn. The women's dress

from the earliest times was a dress reaching from the armpits to the

ankles, with straps over the shoulders. The men's dress was usually a

form of loin-cloth. The wearing of wigs was practically universal, and

originated in prehistoric times. At some early period native ritual

had prescribed that the head must be shaved, so that the fashion of the

long peruke, or the close-fitting cloth cap with ear-lappets, became

practically a necessity. We find, however, that some ladies refused to

sacrifice their hair, and in the well-known statue of Nefert we notice

the bands of natural hair, neatly smoothed down over the brow, peeping

out beneath the heavy wig she is wearing. Practically all classes wore

sandals of leather or plaited papyrus.

In general appearance the Egyptian was tall, being considerably

above the European average in height. The race were for the most

part dolichocephalic, or long-skulled, narrow-waisted and angular.

In later life they frequently became corpulent, but during youth and

early manhood presented rather a 'wiry' appearance. They had, however,

broad shoulders and a well-developed chest-cavity. The examination of

thousands of mummies by Dr. Elliot Smith has proved that in later times

the Egyptian race greatly improved in physique and muscular qualities.

In character the Egyptian was grave, and perhaps a little taciturn,

being in this respect not unlike the Scot and the Spaniard; but, like

these peoples, he had also a strain of gaiety in his composition, and

his popular literature is in places eloquent of the philosophy of

_laissez-faire_. It is probable that the stern religious code under

which he lived drove him at times to deep disgust of his surroundings.

The Egyptian peasant's amusement at times took the form of intoxication,

and pictures are extant which show the labourer being borne home on

the shoulders of his fellows. Among the upper classes, too, it cannot

be denied that a philosophy of pleasure had gained a very strong

hold, especially in later times. They probably thought that if they

committed the _Book of the Dead_ to heart they were sure of a blissful

future, and that in this lay their whole moral duty. As regards their

ethical standpoint, it may be said that they were rather _unmoral_ than

_immoral_, and that good and evil, as we understand it, were almost

unknown to them. The Egyptians as a race possessed, however, an innate

love of justice and right thinking, and they will always take their

place in the roll of nations as a people who have done more than perhaps

any other to upbuild the fabric of order, decency, and propriety.

Myths and Legends of Ancient Egypt · 第 2 / 9 章