The penny letter rate is a source of very considerable profit, and is

therefore not a pure price. Nor can it be said that this penny rate,

although it is the source of practically all the profit, is a pure tax.

In the case of a large number of letters there is no surplus beyond the

cost of the service, and often the cost is greater than the yield of the

postage on the particular letters dealt with. In such cases the rate

does not contain any element of tax. In other cases the proportion of

surplus over cost which the rate yields is exceedingly large.[748] But

in all cases it contains some element of remuneration for service

rendered. That part of it which is appropriated to cover the cost of

conducting the service is of the nature of a price for a service

rendered. The remaining part (when found), after allowance has been made

for the element of monopoly, is a tax.[749] But it does not exist in all

cases. Three categories of letters are therefore found; and the letter

rate in general may, according to the circumstances under which the

service is rendered, be (1) of composite character, partly price and

partly tax, (2) a pure price, (3) a mere fee.

The other rates (excepting for the moment the parcel rate) have all for

some specific purpose of State been fixed at a lower level than the

letter rate; but, for the most part, without any nice adjustment to the

cost of service. Consequently these subsidiary rates are not prices, and

do not contain any element of taxation.[750] They are, however, charges

made to individuals in respect of certain services performed by the

State, and fall, therefore, under the heading of fees.

The parcel rates in England and Germany may be put under the same

heading. In both cases the service is conducted at a loss, and the

charges cannot therefore be regarded as prices. In the United States

and in Canada the law provides that the rates for parcels must in all

cases be such as to yield a revenue sufficient to cover the cost of the

service, and the presumption is therefore that in those countries the

rates will partake of the nature of prices.[751]

Although there has been diversity of opinion regarding the nature of

Post Office revenue, there has been remarkable unanimity as to the

propriety of raising a net revenue for the State on the service for the

transmission of letters. In the days of high rates and relatively high

revenue it was not challenged.[752] Sir Rowland Hill's reform took away

any sort of feeling that the revenue obtained from the Post Office lay

as a burdensome tax, but the amount of surplus revenue was still so

considerable that it could fairly be regarded as containing an element

of tax.[753] It has, moreover, steadily increased, and its existence

been made the justification for claims for further reductions of

rate.[754]

The use of the Post Office for the purpose of taxation, that is, the

refusal to give away in improvements of service, or by reduction of

rates, the net surplus of revenue, is accepted by economists as

justifiable[755] and the public acquiesces. The surplus is obtained

with the minimum of sacrifice on the part of those who pay, and it would

be difficult to discover a tax in substitution which would fall as

lightly. Apart from the fact that rates higher than would be necessary

for defraying the actual cost of the service must of necessity operate

to some extent to the disadvantage of trade and commerce,[756] there is

little to urge against the raising of revenue from the Post Office,

especially as it is obtained from such popular charges as a penny and a

halfpenny, which are well within the reach of the poorest. Payment is,

moreover, in a large degree voluntary. The number of letters which a

private individual must write, and cannot avoid writing, in the course

of a year is very small. If he has anything of importance to write, he

does not think a penny an excessive sum to pay for its transmission. If

he has nothing to write, there is no law to compel him to pay postage.

The profits of postage are, however, large; and the existence of the

State monopoly, and the essentially fiscal character of the rates

charged, should not be overlooked.[757]

* * * * *

VII. GRAPHS

[Illustration: UNITED KINGDOM _INLAND RATES OF POSTAGE 1914, AND NEW

RATES INTRODUCED 1^ST NOVEMBER 1915._]

[Illustration: UNITED KINGDOM (1725-1851)]

[Illustration: UNITED KINGDOM (1820-1914)]

[Illustration: UNITED KINGDOM]

[Illustration: UNITED KINGDOM

_MOVEMENT OF STATISTICS OF POSTAL TRAFFIC 1870-1914_]

[Illustration: UNITED KINGDOM

_NUMBER OF LETTERS DELIVERED PER HEAD OF POPULATION (1854-1914_)]

APPENDIX B

DOCUMENTS AND EXTRACTS ILLUSTRATING ASPECTS OF POSTAL HISTORY

(i) ANCIENT POSTS.

_Persia_ (_circa_ B. C. 500).

"In Darius's idea of government was included rapidity of communication.

Regarding it as of the utmost importance that the orders of the Court

should be speedily transmitted to the provincial Governors, and that

their reports and those of the royal secretaries should be received

without needless delay, he established along the lines of route already

existing between the chief cities of the Empire, a number of

post-houses, placed at regular intervals, according to the estimated

capacity of a horse to gallop at his best speed without stopping. At

each post-house were maintained, at the cost of the State, a number of

couriers and several relays of horses. When a despatch was to be

forwarded, it was taken to the first post-house along the route, where a

courier received it, and immediately mounting on horseback, galloped

with it to the next station. Here it was delivered to a new courier,

who, mounted on a fresh horse, took it the next stage on its journey;

and thus it passed from hand to hand till it reached its destination.

According to Xenophon, the messengers travelled by night as well as by

day; and the conveyance was so rapid that some even compared it to the

flight of birds. Excellent inns or caravanserais were to be found at

every station; bridges or ferries were established upon all the streams;

guard-houses occurred here and there, and the whole route was kept

secure from the brigands who infested the Empire. Ordinary travellers

were glad to pursue so convenient a line of march; it does not appear,

however, that they could obtain the use of post-horses, even when the

Government was in no need of them.

"_Note._--It was not the distance a horse ridden gently could

accomplish in the entire day, but the distance he could bear to be

galloped once a day. From the account which Herodotus gives of the

post-route between Sardis and Susa, we may gather that the Persians

fixed this distance at about fourteen miles."--George Rawlinson, _The

Five Great Monarchies of the Ancient Eastern World_, London, 1871, vol.

iii. pp. 426-7.

_Roman Empire._

"The advantage of receiving the earliest intelligence, and of conveying

their orders with celerity, induced the Emperors to establish throughout

their extensive dominions the regular institution of posts. Houses were

everywhere erected at the distance only of five or six miles; each of

them was constantly provided with forty horses, and, by the help of

these relays, it was easy to travel an hundred miles in a day along the

Roman roads. The use of the posts was allowed to those who claimed it by

an Imperial mandate; but though originally intended for the public

service, it was sometimes indulged to the business or conveniency of

private citizens (Pliny, though a favourite and a minister, made an

apology for granting post-horses to his wife on the most urgent

business)."--Edward Gibbon, _The History of the Decline and Fall of the

Roman Empire_, London, ed. 1896, vol. i. p. 50.

_Arabia._

"The first traces of the Arabian postal arrangements date from about

fifty years after the death of Mahomed. Calif Mdowija, who died in 679,

is regarded as the founder of the Arabian posts. Kodama, a native of

Bagdad, who died in 959, gives an account of the service in his work

called _The Book of Taxes_. There were 930 postal stations on the six

great highroads starting from Bagdad. At some stations there were relays

of horses, but in Syria and Arabia the messengers rode on camels; and in

Persia the letters were conveyed from station to station by messengers

on foot. The postal service under the Califs was an independent branch

of the administration, and in addition to the conveyance of despatches

and travellers was added the supervision of all the authorities in

outlying possessions. Of the two classes of superior postal officers,

the _nowaqquium_ was the postmaster who received the postal packets and

letters and attended to their conveyance, whereas the _farwaneqqyun_ was

a kind of chief postmaster at the capital of a province, who controlled

the work of the postmasters and made his own report on all the civil and

military authorities to the central office in Bagdad. These reports

were so valuable that Calif Abu Djafar Manssur is credited with the

statement: 'My throne rests on four pillars, and my power on four men--a

blameless kazi (judge), an energetic chief of police, an honest minister

of finance, and a faithful postmaster who gives me reliable information

on everything.' It has been said that the Roman _cursus publicus_, the

_frumentarii_, the _agentes in rebus_, and the _curiosi_ served a

similar purpose, but the Arabian arrangement was more systematic. In the

Post Office of the Califs the letters and packets posted, as well as

those received from other places, were entered in special lists, where

their number and address had to be stated. This practice was observed in

India till a few years ago, and it will thus be seen that the letter

bill of the modern posts was in use already among the Egyptians in 270

B.C., and also among the Arabs. From the information that has been

preserved, it is inferred that the Arabian posts did, to a certain

extent, transmit private letters, but this was not done officially, and

the couriers and postmasters conveyed such correspondence, along with

the official despatches, on their own account."--I. G. J. Hamilton,

_Outline of Postal History_, Calcutta, 1910, p. 4.

_Mexico_.

"Communication was maintained with the remotest parts of the country by

means of couriers. Post-houses were established on the great roads,

about two leagues distant from each other. The courier, bearing his

despatches in the form of a hieroglyphical painting, ran with them to

the first station, where they were taken by another messenger and

carried forward to the next; and so on till they reached the capital.

These couriers, trained from childhood, travelled with incredible

swiftness--not four or five leagues an hour, as an old chronicler would

make us believe, but with such speed that despatches were carried from

one to two hundred miles a day. Fresh fish was frequently served at

Montezuma's table in twenty-four hours from the time it had been taken

in the Gulf of Mexico, two hundred miles from the capital. In this way

intelligence of the movements of the royal armies was rapidly brought to

Court; and the dress of the courier, denoting by its colour the nature

of his tidings, spread joy or consternation in the towns through which

he passed."--W. H. Prescott, _History of the Conquest of Mexico_,

London, 1903, pp. 20, 21.

A similar system existed in Peru (W. H. Prescott, _History of the

Conquest of Peru_, Philadelphia, 1874, vol. i. p. 69).

_China._

"From the city of Kanbulu[758] there are many roads leading to the

different provinces, and upon each of these, that is to say, upon every

great highroad, at the distance of twenty-five or thirty miles,

accordingly as the towns happen to be situated, there are stations, with

houses of accommodation for travellers, called _yamb_ or post-houses.

These are large and handsome buildings, having several well-furnished

apartments hung with silk, and provided with everything suitable to

persons of rank. Even kings may be lodged at these stations in a

becoming manner, as every article required may be obtained from the

towns and strong places in the vicinity; and for some of them the Court

makes regular provision. At each station four hundred good horses are

kept in constant readiness, in order that all messengers going and

coming upon the business of the grand khan, and all ambassadors, may

have relays, and, leaving their jaded horses, be supplied with fresh

ones.... When it is necessary that messengers should proceed with

extraordinary despatch, as in the cases of giving information of

disturbance in any part of the country, the rebellion of a chief or

other important matter, they ride two hundred, or sometimes two hundred

and fifty miles in the course of a day."--_Travels of Marco Polo the

Venetian_, London, 1904, pp. 190 et seq.

(ii) _NUNCII_ AND _CURSORES_.

"The Royal _Nuncii et Cursores_ constituted a very important branch of

the Royal Establishment, and the payments to them form a very large and

important item in the Household and Wardrobe Accounts from the earliest

period when those accounts exist.

"These Messengers were employed both in England and in foreign parts,

and as well on affairs of State as what may be considered as the private

and confidential business of the Crown and Royal Family and the

individuals attached to or composing the Royal Court. These Messengers,

so attached to the Court, became the foundation of the establishment,

which about the time of Henry VIII, or somewhat earlier, assumed the

form of the regular establishment of the Post; and the information

connected with them is important, as showing that the institution was

intimately connected with the person of the sovereign, and that, in the

first instance, it was his convenience that was sought. Those servants

who, by usage, were more particularly employed on State affairs,

probably became those who are now specially termed the 'Queen's

Messengers.'"--_Report from Secret Committee on the Post Office_

(_Commons_), 1844, Appx., p. 21.

(iii) WITHERINGS' SCHEME FOR THE REFORM OF THE POSTS, 1635.

A Proposition for setling of Staffets or pacquet posts betwixt

London and all parts of his Maiesties dominions, for the carrying

and recarrying of his subiects l[~r]es. The cleere proffitt whereof

to goe towards the payment of the Postm^{rs} of y^{e} Roades of

England, for w^{ch} his Ma^{tie} is now chardged w^{th} 3400_l._ p

a[~n]m.

In the first place, a certen office or compting house to be by his

Ma^{tie} appointed w^{th}in the cittie of London, of purpose for

carrying out & receiving in of all L[~r]es to be conveyed from y^{e}

cittie of London into all p^{ts} w^{th}in his Ma^{ts} dominions &

answers thereof retorned to the said Cittie of London, according as

occasion shall serve.

Inprimis, for the Northerne and Scotland roade, All l[~r]es to be put

into one Portmantle that shalbe directed to Edenburgh in Scotland, and

for all places of the s^{d} roade, or neere the s^{d} roade, to be

accordinglie put into y^{e} s^{d} Portmantle, w^{th} [p=]ticuler baggs

directed to such Postm^{rs} as live upon the Road neere unto any Cittie

or Towne Corporate.

_As for Example_--

One Bagge to be directed to Cambridge w^{th} such l[~r]es therein as

shalbe directed to that place or neere thereunto; to take port for them

as is now p[~d] to the Carriers, w^{ch} is Two pence a single l[~r]e,

and so accordinglie as they shalbe in bignes. At Cambridge a footpost to

be provided, w^{th} a knowne badge of his Ma^{ts} Armes, whome upon the

markett daies is to goe to all Townes w^{th}in 6: 8: or 10 miles, there

to receive & deliver all such l[~r]es as shalbe directed to those

places. The l[~r]es that the s^{d} footpost shall then and there

receive, hee is to bring them to the s^{d} Towne of Cambridge before the

retorne of the Portmantle out of Scotland, w^{ch} is to retorne at a

certen daie & houre, by w^{ch} meanes they maie be upon the verie

instante comeing back of the s^{d} Portmantle, as before, put into a

little bagge, w^{ch} s^{d} bagg is to be put into y^{e} s^{d} Portmantle

as aforesaid. It is alwaies to be understood that upon the verie instant

cominge of the Portmantle to Cambridge, the bagg of l[~r]es for that

place & thereaboutes ymmediatly to be tooke out of the s^{d} Portmantle;

the said Portmantle being presentlie to goe forwards, night and day,

w^{th}out stay, to Huntingdon, w^{th} fresh horse & man. At w^{ch} place

the like rule is to be observed as before at Cambridge, & so the s^{d}

Portmantle is to goe from Stage to Stage, night & day, till it shall

come to Edenburgh. The bags of l[~r]es to be left at all Stages as at

Cambridge and Huntingdon, as before.

Only it is to be understood, that the further the l[~r]es shall goe, the

port thereof is to be advanced, as to 3^{d}, 4^{d}, & 6^{d}, & to

Scotland more. By this way of carrying and recarrying of l[~r]es, his

Ma^{ts} subjects shall, once in 6 daies, receive answer from Edenburgh

in Scotland, and so consequently from all p^{ts} betwixt London &

Scotland.

The daie and howre of the comeing and going of the s^{d} Portmantle to

and from London to be alwaies certaine. By w^{ch} meanes all Stages upon

the Road will knowe at what certen howre the Portmantle is to come to

y^{t} place.

It is truth it maie be alledged, that some Citties & Townes of noate

will lye so farre from any of the mayne Roads of England, as Hull &

other Townes of noate upon the Sea coasts, as that it wilbe impossible

for a footman to carry and recarry the s^{d} l[~r]es w^{th}in such time

as shalbe limitted: for remedie thereof a horse is to be provided for

the s^{d} footpost, for the execu[=co]n of the s^{d} service w^{th} more

expedi[=co]n.

The like rule is to be observed to Westchester & so to Ireland.

The like rule is to be observed to Oxford, Bristoll, & so to Ireland.

The like rule is to be observed to Worcester, Shrewesbury, and so to

y^{e} Marches of Wales.

The like rule to be observed to Exceter, & so to Plymouth.

The like rule to be observed to Canterbury, & so to Dovo^{r}.

The like rule to be observed to Chelmesford, Colchester, and so to

Harw^{ch}.

The like rule to be observed to Newmarket, Bury, Norw^{ch}, and so to

Yarmouth.

In the first place, it wilbe a great furtherance to the correspondency

betwixt London & Scotland, & London & Ireland, and great help to Trades,

& true affec[=co]n of his Ma^{ts} subiects betwixt theis kingdomes,

which, for want of true correspondency of l[~r]es, is now destroyed, & a

thing above all things observed by all other nations.

_As for Example_--

If anie of his M^{ats} subiects shall write to Madrill, in Spain, hee

shall receive answer sooner & surer then hee shall out of Scotland or

Ireland. The l[~r]es being now carried by carriers or footposts 16 or 18

miles a day, it is full two monthes before any answer can be received

from Scotland or Ireland to London, w^{ch} by this Conveyance all

l[~r]es shall goe 120 miles at y^{e} least in one day & night.

It will Secondlie be alledged, that it is a wrong to the Carriers that

bring the said letters. To which is answered, a Carrier setts out from

Westchester to London on the Mundaie, w^{ch} is 120 miles. The s^{d}

Carrier is 8 daies upon the Road, and upon his cominge to London

delivers his letters of advise for his relodinge to Westchester againe,

and his forced to staie in London two daies at extraordinary charges

before he can get his loding redy.

By this Conveyance l[~r]es wilbe fr[=o] Westchester to London in one day

& night, so that the s^{d} Carriers loading wilbe made ready a weeke

before the s^{d} Carriers shall come to London, and they no sooner come

to London but maie be redy to depte againe.

The like will fall out in all other pts.

Besides, if at any time there should be occasion to write from anie of

the coast Townes in England or Scotland to London, by this Conveyance

l[~r]es wilbe brought ymmediatly: & from all such places there wilbe

weekely advise to & from London.

_As for Example_--

Anie fight at Sea: any distress of his Ma^{ts} shipps, (w^{ch} Godd

forbidd), anie wrong offered by any other nation to any of y^{e} Coaste

of England, or anie of his Ma^{ts} forts: the Posts being punctually

paid, the newes will come sooner then thought.

It wilbe, thirdlie, alledged that this service maie be [^p]tended by

the Lo: Stanhope to be in his graunt of Post M^{r} of England. To w^{ch}

is answered, neither the Lo: Stanhope, nor anie other that ever enjoyed

the Postm^{s} place of England, had any benefitt of the carrying and

recarrying of the subiects L[~r]es: beside, the profitt is to paie y^{e}

Posts of the Road, w^{ch} next unto his Ma^{tie}, belong to y^{e} office

of the s^{d} Lo: Stanhope, and upon determina[=co]n of any of the s^{d}

Posts places, by death or otherwise, the Lo: Stanhope will make as much

of them as hath heretofore bin made by this said advancement of all

theire places.

The Lord Stanhope now enioying what either hee or any of his

Predecesso^{s} hath ever heretofore done to this day.

(Indorsed by Sec. Coke)

"Proposition for Missive Letters."

--_Report from Secret Committee on the Post Office_ (_Commons_), 1844,

Appx., pp. 55-6.

(iv) THE MONOPOLY AND THE GENERAL FARM OF THE POSTS.

No. 1.

"Whereas heretofore sundry wayes have bene devised to redresse the

disorders among the postes of our realme in generall, and particularly

to prevent the inconveniences, both to our owne service and the lawfull

trade of the honest merchants, by prohibiting that no persons whatsoever

should take upon them, publiquely or privately, to procure, gather up,

receive ... any packets or letters to or from the countreys beyond the

seas, except such our ordinarie posts and messengers for those parties,

etc."--royal Proclamation, April 26th 1591.

No. 2.

"There has long been a constant trade betwixt London and Norwich in

sundry sorts of stuffs and stockings made in Norwich and Norfolk, which

trade has always been maintained by the merchants of Norwich employing

their stocks in buying wares of the makers and sending them up weekly in

carts by common carriers to London, whence they are dispersed into all

parts of this kingdom, and also exported to foreign parts, in which

intercourse of trade we always had our letters safely and speedily

carried by our common carrier, by a horseman, not in manner of postage

by change of horses, but as is usual by common carriers, and for little

or no charge to us. Of late Mr. Witherings has intercepted our letters

and molested our carriers, forbidding them to carry any of our letters

otherwise than to go along with their carts, and no faster."--Petition

to Privy Council, 1638; J. W. Hyde, _The Post in Grant and Farm_,

London, 1894, p. 131.

No. 3.

" ... By a Proclamation dated about July 1635 his Majestie did expresse

his pleasure, that _Thomas Witherings_ should have the carriage of the

said letters who would settle it in a better and more speedy course;

thereupon he undertook the said work, and for a long time, after his

said undertaking, it cost him some weeks 20l. 30l. 40l. more than he

received, to the great weakening and hazard of the ruine of his estate.

It is verie true, that untill he had his patent of his Office granted

unto him for his life, which was in the yeare 1637, he did in some

places lay horses of his owne, in others he did make use of the

ordinarie Post-horses, and because he desired quick dispatch, hee paid

them for a guide and a horse to carrie the male 6d. _per_ mile, after

not conceiving a guide necessarie he made only use of one horse, and

paid 3d. _per_ mile.... for the other Posts, they have 3d. _per_ mile

which is more than ordinarie pay. But the objection which seems to

carrie the greatest shew, or colour of probabilitie with it is; That the

P^{mrs} had formerly 4,000_l._ _per annum_ fee, onely for carrying his

Majesties packets, that Witherings hath reduced this to 2,053l. _per

annum_, and yet puts a greater burthen upon them by carrying his male;

hath displaced many of them and received 4,000l. for Post

places."--_Full and cleare answer to a false and scandalous Paper

entituled: The humble Remonstrance of the grievances of all his

Majesties Posts of England, together with Carriers, Waggoners, etc._,

1641, pp. 2, 3.

No. 4.

Reasons presented to the Committee for Postmasters why the office should

not be farmed:--

(1) What is of public interest, if farmed, often becomes a great public

grievance.

(2) The postmasters who have served faithfully and others who run best

to Lynn, Yarmouth, etc., must be restrained and will complain as they

did in 1642 to the late Parliament which ordered them redress.

(3) By farming, the pay of postmasters will be made so inconsiderable

that they will grow careless.

(4) The expectations of the people now at this juncture so highly raised

to hopes of ease and freedom, will be disappointed when they see new

monopolies.

* * * * *

The Development of Rates of Postage: An Historical and Analytical Study · 第 26 / 42 段