A number of postmasters criticized the suggestions of the

Postmaster-General in 1890 regarding parcel post, but most of them had,

by 1891, expressed themselves in favour of a full parcel post system,

and according to Mr. Wanamaker the remainder were "probably interested

express agents." The situation was in some respects unsatisfactory. It

was a common practice for business firms to contract with express

companies to carry large quantities of small packages at a rate per

package just below the rate of postage. The express companies took such

of the packages as they thought fit to handle, and left the Post Office

to carry the remainder, all long-distance traffic, and unprofitable both

to the express companies and to the Post Office. But the companies were

secured by their profit in the short distances. Naturally, therefore,

they offered strenuous opposition to the establishment of a parcel

post.[416]

With the establishment of rural mail delivery there arose a new demand

for a parcel post. Persons living on the rural routes desired to take

advantage of the new service for the delivery of small parcels of

merchandise of all kinds, food-stuffs, tobacco, dry goods, etc., which

they would order from the local store-keeper by post or by telephone.

The rate then payable on such parcels was the general rate for

fourth-class matter, viz. 16 cents a pound, which for parcels of goods

of small intrinsic value was prohibitive. In response to this demand,

the first definite proposals for a parcel post[417] were put forward by

the department in 1904, when the establishment of a special rate of 3

cents a pound was suggested, with a maximum limit of weight of 5 pounds,

for parcels from any distributing office for rural routes to any patron

on the routes from that office. Such a rate "would be a great

convenience to the patrons and become a source of revenue to the

department." The rate of 3 cents was estimated to be ample remuneration

in such cases, because there would be no expense for railway

transportation, and as it would be merely employing a system already

established, there would be no additional expense for delivery: the

rural carriers could easily perform the service.[418] They had at first

been allowed to carry express packages, but the privilege had been

subsequently withdrawn. They were, however, still authorized by law to

carry merchandise for hire, on behalf of patrons of the rural routes,

and to carry passengers. In general, their work for the Post Office only

employed them to the extent of 30 percent, of their full capacity, and a

large unutilized margin therefore existed.

The proposal was again advanced in following years. Postmaster-General

Meyer interested himself in the question, and advocated in speeches in

various parts of the country the immediate adoption of a parcel post

system. In 1907 he suggested the introduction of a local parcel post

service experimentally. He made at this time numerous treaties with

foreign countries for parcel post services between those countries and

the United States, at a general rate of 12 cents a pound. The result was

that parcels could be posted at any town in the United States for

transmission to places in, say, Europe or Australia, at the rate of 12

cents a pound, but could only be posted for transmission to another town

in the United States on payment of a rate of 16 cents a pound. When this

situation was realized, there was naturally a good deal of irritation,

and the existence of such an anomaly was made an argument for a domestic

service.[419]

The preferential rate obtained by parcels going abroad continued to be a

strong argument in favour of a general parcel post, and members of

Congress constantly referred to it in the discussions on the subject.

There was, moreover, and still is, an important body of opinion which

goes much further than the advocacy of a parcel post system. In that

view, the express companies are the enemy or, at any rate, the

oppressive character of the express rates is viewed so seriously that no

solution of the present difficulties of the country, and especially of

the "high cost of living" problem, is thought possible short of a

complete express service run by the general Government. Relief will

only be found under some system which will bring the producer of the

necessaries of life into direct relationship with the consumer,[420] in

order that the enormous middleman's charges be eliminated and the

consumer obtain the produce at a price not greatly above the actual cost

of production. The railways refuse to handle shipments less than 100

pounds, and their minimum charge is 25 cents. The ordinary consumer who

requires consignments of much less than 100 pounds' weight has no use

for such a service. For shipments of less weight, the only service

available is the express service, the minimum rate for which, in general

25 cents, is too great for farm products, which are usually of low value

and could not bear a rate of 25 cents. The express service, which is

restricted to the railway system, has, moreover, no means of reaching

that vast body of the people, estimated at some 40,000,000, who are

living on the farms, and who alone are able to supply the desired

traffic in food-stuffs. The Government has in recent years, at heavy

expense, extended to some 20 millions of people the benefits of free

mail delivery, and the intention of the advocates of a Government

express service, a "postal express," is that the State should take over

the express companies, paying them fair compensation for their property,

and work their service in conjunction with the rural mail delivery. By

this means an extensive service could be provided at reasonable rates of

charge.[421]

In February 1908 Bills were introduced in the Senate to increase the

limit of weight of fourth-class matter, and to provide a rural delivery

parcel post for merchandise and other articles mailed on rural delivery

routes. Legislation did not, however, result.

Meantime, the feeling in favour of a parcel post was spreading, more

especially in the farming districts. In November 1911 a Sub-Committee of

the Senate Committee on Post Offices and Post Roads was appointed to

examine the practicability of establishing a parcel post system. The

Sub-Committee was appointed on a resolution of the Senate, moved by

Senator Jonathan Bourne, Jr., the Chairman of the Senate Committee on

Post Offices and Post Roads, and there is indication that the adoption

of the system had already been practically decided upon, the real

question before the Sub-Committee being that of its practicability as an

immediate proposition. The Post Office representatives advocated a

limited experimental introduction of parcel post on rural routes and in

the city delivery offices. They were impressed with the radical

differences between the United States and most other countries where

parcel post was in operation, and hesitated to recommend the

introduction of a general service. But the members of the Sub-Committee

had in mind to introduce as soon as practicable a complete system by the

method of enlarging the scope of the fourth-class regulations and

reducing the rates of postage. Numerous witnesses appeared before the

Sub-Committee, representing general societies of business men, such as

the National Dairy Union, the Associated Retailers of St. Louis, Me.,

and the Retail Dry Goods Association of New York; educational or social

societies, such as the American Library Association, the Postal Progress

League, and the Knights of Labour; farmers' societies, such as the State

Granges and the Farmers' Educational and Co-operative Union of America.

Several farmers, lawyers, and other gentlemen appeared to give their own

personal views. The chief opposition to the parcel-post came from the

representatives of the retailers, who stand in constant fear of losing

their business to the mail-order or catalogue houses. The business of

these houses is very large, amounting in the aggregate to nearly

$200,000,000 per annum, and there is perhaps some reason for the local

merchants' apprehensions. The bulk of the mail-order traffic is,

however, distributed as freight. But the country merchants were much

alarmed, and there were doleful prophecies of the results of a parcel

post. The local merchant was represented as the mainstay of the

country-side. He it was who sustained the country town, which afforded

so valuable a local market for the farmer. He it was to whom alone that

same farmer could look for credit to tide him over bad times. He it was

who made the country town a social centre where the farmer might come

into touch with civilization and refinement. And on the continuance of

the prosperity of the country merchant depended the continuance of the

army of travelling salesmen, without whose patronage railroads would be

driven to reduce the number of trains, hotels would go out of business,

and throughout the country accommodation for travellers would be found

extremely poor. In short, parcel post would reduce the country merchant

to the same condition as the small shopkeeper in Europe; and the country

towns would become mere hamlets and deserted villages.[422]

The parcel post was, of course, as likely in 1912 to prove a blow to the

express companies as in the earlier years when they had so strongly

resisted any proposal for its introduction. In face, however, of the

strong and widespread movement in the country in its favour, they

realized that they would be unable always successfully to resist its

establishment, and no open opposition to the proposals of 1912 was

encountered from them. They did not appear before the Senate

Sub-Committee.

The Sub-Committee saw no insuperable difficulty in the way of

introducing a general system at once. Moreover, they were impressed by

the fact that a parcel post system was in operation in most other

countries of the world, even in Australia, a country slightly larger in

area than the United States and much more sparsely populated, where the

two factors which so radically distinguished the United States from most

other countries in which a parcel post had been established were met

with in even greater degree.

When the questions of the desirability and practicability of

establishing a system had been decided, there still remained the

difficult and important question of the scheme of rates of charge on

which the system should be based. Some of the witnesses before the

Sub-Committee advocated a uniform rate, representing that a graduated

rate was undesirable and would be unacceptable, as giving a special

privilege to certain sections of the people. A more general opinion was

that a flat rate would be unsound economically. With such a rate, the

express companies would step in and take all the profitable traffic; and

it would, moreover, be necessary to fix the rate so high as to render it

prohibitive for goods of low value and for the purpose of moving traffic

on the rural routes. In a country of vast extent the actual cost to the

Government for the transportation of parcels of the same weight would

differ widely in proportion to the distance for which they were conveyed

in the mails, and the differences would be sufficiently great to render

it easily possible to graduate a scale of postage approximately in

accordance with the distance and the actual cost. The department

estimated the cost of transportation for mail matter to be 1.32 cents

for each 200 miles, and taking this as a basis, differential rates in

respect of transportation were arrived at for a series of zones.

The charge for handling, i.e. for collection, delivery, administrative

and all other incidental services, was calculated as an altogether

separate item. The Sub-Committee had the evidence of Mr. John L.

Newbold, a gentleman of long experience in a transport business which

dealt mainly with small parcels for delivery within the limits of the

City of Washington, and was therefore in a high degree comparable to

delivery service which would be performed by the Post Office in respect

of parcels. Mr. Newbold offered to contract with the Government to

handle all post parcels for delivery within the City of Washington at 5

cents a parcel, with a limit of weight of 25 pounds. Estimates by

similar delivery companies in New York City indicated the cost to them

of packages up to 25 pounds, which was a little over 5 cents per

package. The department's estimate of the handling cost of fourth-class

matter showed a cost of a fraction under 3 cents for the first pound,

with an approximate increase of 20 per cent. for each additional pound.

These data furnished a basis for calculating rates of postage, when the

limitation of the zones had been determined, a matter of some little

difficulty. The first, and most obvious, suggestion was that the zones

should be reckoned as from each post office, but in view of the fact

that there were some 60,000 post offices in the United States, grave

practical difficulties would arise with a scheme providing for special

rates from each post office. It was then thought the State might be

adopted as the unit of area, but the States differ so widely in area

that such a system would have resulted inequitably, giving equal postage

charges for very unequal services. A citizen in Texas or New York State,

for example, would be able to send his parcel many times as far as a

citizen of Massachusetts or Delaware. The same objection applied, though

not in so great degree, to the county as a unit of area. Moreover, these

units would be liable to arbitrary change. Failing the discovery of any

satisfactory unit based on the political divisions, recourse was had to

purely theoretical divisions, based on the imaginary lines of latitude

and longitude. The actual degree parallels were rejected as the limits

of the units of area because, within the quadrangle formed by them,

there would be a maximum zone distance of some 80 miles; while at the

same time, for transmission between two places perhaps only two miles

apart but lying on different sides of the line, postage would be

chargeable as for the second zone. This difficulty was overcome by an

ingenious suggestion, which emanated from the department, to divide the

degree quadrangles in four, that is, into squares of 30 minutes

dimension, and to allow the sending of parcels at the first zone rate

from or to places in every contiguous quadrangle.

Under this method, which was adopted, the United States is divided into

3,500 units of area, which are definite, never-changing, and practically

uniform in size, the slight difference in area depending on the distance

from the Equator being negligible. Each unit is given an index number,

and all post offices in the unit have the same index number. Each unit

has its own zone limits, which apply equally to every office in the

unit. So that in order to discover for what zone postage is to be

charged between two places, it is only necessary to ascertain what are

the zone limits for the units of area in which the places are

respectively situated. A simple reference to a guide showing in what

unit of area the post office of destination falls, and a consultation

of the zone map of the office at which the packet is posted, that is, a

map showing the boundaries of each zone measured from the unit of area

in which the office is situated as centre, gives in a very short space

of time the rate applicable to the parcel.

A simplification of rates and regulations is always attended by a

diminution of the difficulties of administration, by economy of actual

working, and by convenience to the public. In connection with the

proposed parcel post the department, with these objects in view,

suggested the abolition of the separate class for printed matter, and

its amalgamation with the parcel post matter, thus reducing the number

of classes of mail matter to three. The Chairman of the Senate

Sub-Committee adopted this suggestion, and embodied it in the Bill which

he prepared and introduced in the Senate on the 16th May 1912,

retaining, however, a rate of 1 cent per ounce up to 4 ounces, in order

to provide for circular matter which, under the third-class rate, passed

at 1 cent for 2 ounces. This was apparently a doubling of the rate, but

as the average weight of circulars is under 1 ounce, in actual practice

the great bulk of them would continue to pass at 1 cent. This provision

would, however, raise the rate on all catalogues and circulars weighing

more than 1 ounce; and although 90 per cent. of the number of pieces of

third-class matter actually posted are under 4 ounces in weight and

would have fallen under the proposed special rate, and 50 per cent. are

under 1 ounce in weight and would have passed for the same amount as

under the existing third-class rate, viz. 1 cent, this provision of the

Bill was strenuously opposed by printers and catalogue houses. Not

regarding the consolidation of the two classes as in any way essential

to the establishment of a parcel post system, the Senate Committee on

Post Offices and Post Roads, when they came to consider the Bill,

decided to eliminate that feature.

In general this Bill represented the conclusions of the Sub-Committee,

and, apart from the foregoing change, was substantially accepted by the

Senate Committee. The only other amendments made were an increase of the

number of zones from six to eight, with the view of "protecting the

local merchant in the field of his business," and a slight raising of

the rates for the shorter distances, partly from a fear that the rates

proposed in the Bill would not be self-sustaining, and partly from a

desire further to protect the local retail merchant against the

catalogue houses.

The essential provisions of the Bill, as thus amended, were embodied in

the Post Office Appropriation Bill for the fiscal year 1913, were

accepted by Congress, and became law on the 24th August 1912. The actual

zones and rates fixed were as follows:--

First zone: All territory within quadrangle or unit of area and

every contiguous quadrangle.

Second zone: All units of area outside the first zone within a

radius of, approximately, 150 miles from the centre of a given unit

of area.

Third zone: The same within a radius of, approximately, 300 miles.

Fourth zone: The same within a radius of, approximately, 600 miles.

Fifth zone: The same within a radius of, approximately, 1,000

miles.

Sixth zone: The same within a radius of, approximately, 1,400

miles.

Seventh zone: The same within a radius of, approximately, 1,800

miles.

Eighth zone: All units of area outside the seventh zone.

The rates were:--

On rural route: 5 cents for the first pound or fraction of a pound,

and 1 cent for each additional pound or fraction of a pound.

Each additional

First Pound. Pound.

First zone 5 cents. 3 cents.

Second zone 6 " 4 "

Third zone 7 " 5 "

Fourth zone 8 " 6 "

Fifth zone 9 " 7 "

Sixth zone 10 " 9 "

Seventh zone 11 " 10 "

Eighth zone 12 " 12 "

Although, of course, with the body of the people the main arguments had

been the ordinary contentions of the advantage of such a system as

providing a most convenient facility for persons in all parts of the

States, and especially in the rural districts, whereby they would be

able by the utilization of existing machinery to have articles of all

descriptions brought to their doors, yet in Congress the argument was

largely based on the possibility of finding in the parcel post a means

of reducing the "high cost of living," a problem which is giving much

anxiety to politicians in America. By means of the parcel post, producer

and consumer are to be brought into direct relations the one with the

other. All middlemen and their profits will be eliminated, and either

the producer will get more for his products or the consumer will pay

less--which of these will happen does not appear: probably in some

degree both are hoped for.

The experience of England may not be any indication of what will happen

in America. But it is certain that in England the produce sent direct

from farm to consumer, whether eggs, butter, or poultry, is not obtained

by the consumer at less cost than he could buy it in his own town. There

is an advantage, but it rests solely in quality. The products obtained

from the farm are more fresh, are probably better altogether, but the

price is not less. In England these considerations have been sufficient

to prevent the wholesale use of the parcel post for food-stuffs. It is,

in fact, in general used for such traffic only by those people to whom a

little extra expense is not an object of consideration. The conditions

in America seem, however, to be substantially different from those in

this country, and a large development of parcel post business of this

character is anticipated.[423]

On the 15th August 1913 the limit of weight was increased to 20 pounds

in the local, first, and second zones; and on 1st January 1914 the limit

in local, first, and second zones was further increased to 50 pounds,

and in the remainder of the zones to 20 pounds. On the 16th March 1914

books and printed matter were admitted to the fourth class, or parcel

post, with a rate of postage of 1 cent for each 2 ounces up to 8 ounces,

the ordinary parcel post pound rates to apply to packets exceeding 8

ounces in weight.

The service, as a whole, has been enormously successful. It is estimated

that in the second year the post office was handling parcels at the rate

of 800,000,000 annually, a figure which may be compared to its advantage

with that for the United Kingdom. In the United Kingdom the annual

number of parcels posted is some 130,000,000, say three per head of the

total population as compared with eight per head in the new service in

the United States.

* * * * *

PARCEL POST IN FRANCE

The conveyance of parcels of merchandise, which had been undertaken by

the early posts in France, was abandoned to private enterprise in

1795.[424] When, therefore, proposals were made for the establishment of

an international parcel post service, France was without an internal

service of the kind. She became, nevertheless, a party to the Convention

of 1880, which established an international service,[425] availing

herself of the privilege reserved to those countries without an inland

parcel post service, of arranging for their obligations under the terms

of the Convention to be assumed by railway and steamship companies. A

contract was concluded with the administration of the State railways,

the six great railway companies, and the shipping companies in receipt

of subsidies for the conveyance of mails, under which those bodies

undertook to conduct a service on behalf of the postal administration in

accordance with the provisions of the Convention. They were to receive

in its entirety the prescribed territorial transit rate of 50 centimes

on every parcel, but not the surtax of 25 centimes.[426] The payment of

50 centimes per parcel was to be divided by the companies among

themselves if the parcel was conveyed by more than one party, and

constituted the full remuneration for the entire service performed,

including the customs formalities. The contracting companies were

required to print at their own cost a list of places served, and to keep

the list available for reference by members of the public.

The Development of Rates of Postage: An Historical and Analytical Study · 第 14 / 42 段