CHAPTER X

MOTTE-CASTLES IN SCOTLAND

The Scottish historians of the 19th century have amply recognised the

Anglo-Norman occupation of Scotland, which took place in the 11th and

12th centuries, ever since its extent and importance were demonstrated

by Chalmers in his _Caledonia_. Occupation is not too strong a word to

use, although it was an occupation about which history is strangely

silent, and which seems to have provoked little resistance except in

the Keltic parts of the country. But it meant the transformation of

Scotland from a tribal Keltic kingdom into an organised feudal state,

and in the accomplishment of this transformation the greater part of

the best lands in Scotland passed into the hands of English refugees or

Norman and Flemish adventurers.

The movement began in the days of Malcolm Canmore, when his English

queen, the sainted Margaret, undoubtedly favoured the reception

of English refugees of noble birth, some of whom were her own

relations.[1000] Very soon, the English refugees were followed by

Norman refugees, who had either fallen under the displeasure of the

king of England, like the Montgomeries, or were the cadets of some

Norman family, wishful to carve out fresh fortunes for themselves, like

the Fitz Alans, the ancestors of the Stuarts. The immigration continued

during the reign of the sons of Margaret, but seems to have reached its

culminating point under David I. (1124-1153).

David, as Burton remarks, had lived for sixteen years as an affluent

Anglo-Norman noble, before his accession to the Scottish crown, being

Earl of Huntingdon in right of his wife, the daughter of Simon de

Senlis, and granddaughter, through her mother, of Earl Waltheof.

David's tastes and sympathies were Norman, but it was not taste

alone which impelled him to build up in Scotland a monarchy of the

Anglo-Norman feudal type. He had a distinct policy to accomplish; he

wished to do for Scotland what Edward I. sought to do for the whole

island, to unite its various nationalities under one government, and

he saw that men of the Anglo-Norman type would be the best instruments

of this policy.[1001] It mattered little to him from what nation he

chose his followers, if they were men who accepted his ideas. Norman,

English, Flemish, or Norse adventurers were all received at his

court, and endowed with lands in Scotland, if they were men suitable

for working the system which he knew to be the only one available

for the accomplishment of his policy. And that system was the feudal

system. He saw that feudalism meant a higher state of civilisation

than the tribalism of Keltic Scotland, and that only by the complete

organisation of feudalism could he carry out the unification of

Scotland, and the subjugation of the wild Keltic tribes of the north

and west.[1002]

The policy was successful, though it was not completely carried out

until Alexander III. purchased the kingdom of the Isles from the King

of Norway in 1266. The sons of David, Malcolm IV., and William the Lion

were strong men who doughtily continued the subjugation of the Keltic

parts of Scotland, and distributed the lands of the conquered among

their Norman or Normanised followers. The struggle was a severe one;

again and again did the North rebel against the yoke of the House of

Malcolm. In Moray the Keltic inhabitants were actually driven out by

Malcolm IV., and the country colonised by Normans or Flemings.[1003]

The same Malcolm led no less than three expeditions against Galloway,

where in spite of extensive Norse settlements on the coast, the mass of

the inhabitants appear to have been Keltic.[1004]

We know very little about the details of this remarkable revolution,

because Scotland had no voice in the 12th century, none of her

chroniclers being earlier than the end of the 14th century. As regards

the subject which concerns this book, the building of castles, there

are only one or two passages which lift the veil. A contemporary

English chronicler, Ailred of Rievaulx, in his panegyric of David I.,

says that David decorated Scotland with castles and cities.[1005] In

like manner Benedict of Peterborough tells us that when William the

Lion was captured by Henry II.'s forces in 1174, the men of Galloway

took the opportunity to destroy all the castles which the king had

built in their country, expelling his seneschals and guards, and

killing all the English and French whom they could catch.[1006] Fordun

casually mentions the building of two castles in Ross by William the

Lion; and once he gives us an anecdote which is a chance revelation

of what must have been going on everywhere. A certain English knight,

Robert, son of Godwin, whose Norman name shows that he was one of the

Normanised English, tarried with the king's leave on an estate which

King Edgar had given him in Lothian, _and while he was seeking to build

a castle there_, he was attacked by the men of Bishop Ranulf of Durham,

who objected to a castle being built so near the English frontier.[1007]

But even if historians had been entirely silent about the building of

castles in Scotland, we should have been certain that it must have

happened, as an inevitable part of the Norman settlement. Robertson

remarks that the Scots in the time of David I. were still a pastoral

and in some respects a migratory people, their magnates not residing

like great feudal nobles in their own castles, but moving about

from place to place, and quartering themselves upon the dependent

population. There is in fact no reason for supposing that the Keltic

chiefs of Scotland built castles, any more than those of Wales or

Ireland.[1008] But the feudal system must very soon have covered

Scotland with castles.

The absence of any stone castles of Norman type has puzzled Scottish

historians, whose ideas of castles were associated with buildings in

stone.[1009] In 1898 Dr Christison published his valuable researches

into the _Early Fortifications of Scotland_, in which for the first

time an estimate was attempted of the distribution of Scottish

_motes_,[1010] and their Norman origin almost, if not quite, suspected.

His book was quickly followed by Mr George Neilson's noteworthy paper

on the "Motes in Norman Scotland,"[1011] in which he showed that the

wooden castle is the key which unlocks the historians' puzzle, and that

the motes of Scotland are nothing but the evidence of the Norman feudal

settlement.

Two important points urged in Mr Neilson's paper are the feudal and

legal connection of these motes. He has given a list of mottes which

are known to have been the site of the "chief messuages" of baronies

in the 13th and 14th centuries, and has collected the names of a great

number which were seats of justice, or places where "saisine" of a

barony was taken, not because they were moot-hills, but because the

administration of justice remained fixed in the ancient site of the

baron's castle. "The doctrine of the chief messuage, which became of

large importance in peerage law, made it at times of moment to have on

distinct record the nomination of what the chief messuage was, often

for the imperative function of taking _sasine_. In many instances the

_caput baroniæ_, or the court or place for the ceremonial entry to

possession, is the 'moit,' the 'mothill,' the 'auld castell,' the 'auld

wark,' the 'castellsteid,' the 'auld castellsteid,' the 'courthill,'

or in Latin _mons placiti_, _mons viridis_, or _mons castri_."[1012]

In certain places where two mottes are to be found, he was able to

prove that two baronies had once had their seats. Another point which

Mr Neilson worked out is the relation of bordlands to mottes. Bordland

or borland, though an English word, is not pre-Conquest; it refers

to "that species of demesne which the lord reserves for the supply

of his own table." It is constantly found in the near proximity of

mottes.[1013]

The following is a list of thirty-eight Anglo-Norman or Normanised

adventurers settled in Scotland, on whose lands mottes are to be found.

The list must be regarded as a tentative one, for had all the names

given by Chalmers been included, it would have been more than doubled.

But the difficulties of obtaining topographical information were so

great that it has been judged expedient to give only the names of those

families who are known to have held lands, and in most cases to have

had their principal residences, in places where mottes are or formerly

were existing.[1014]

ANSTRUTHER.--William de Candela obtained the lands of Anstruther, in

Fife, from David I. His descendants took the surname of Anstruther. The

"Mothlaw" of Anstruther is mentioned in 1590.[1015] "At the W. end of

the town there is a large mound, called the Chester Hill, in the middle

of which is a fine well." (N. S. A., 1845.) The well is an absolute

proof that this was the site of a castle.

AVENEL.--Walter de Avenel held Abercorn Castle and estate, in

Linlithgow, in the middle of the 12th century. The castle stood on a

green mound (N. S. A.) which is clearly marked in the O.M.

BALLIOL.--The De Bailleul family had their seat at Barnard Castle, in

Durham, after the Conquest. They obtained lands in Galloway from David

I., and had strongholds at Buittle, and Kenmure, in Kirkcudbright. At

Buittle the site of the castle exists, a roughly triangular bailey with

a motte at one corner;[1016] and at Kenmure the O.M. clearly shows a

motte, as does the picture in Grose's _Antiquities of Scotland_. The

terraces probably date from the time when the modern house on top was

built.

BARCLAY.--The De Berkeleys sprang from the De Berkeleys of England,

and settled in Scotland in the 12th century. Walter de Berkeley was

Chamberlain of Scotland in 1165; William the Lion gave him the manor

of Inverkeilor, in Forfarshire; there he built a castle, on Lunan Bay.

"An artificial mound on the west side of the bay, called the Corbie's

Knowe, bears evident marks of having been a castle long previous to

the erection of Redcastle." (N. S. A.) The family also had lands in

what is now Aberdeenshire, and at Towie, in the parish of Auchterless,

they had a castle. "Close to the church of Auchterless there is a small

artificial eminence of an oval shape, surrounded by a ditch, which is

now in many places filled up. It still retains the name of the Moat

Head, and was formerly the seat of the baronial court." (N. S. A.; N.;

C.)

BRUCE.--The De Brus held lands in North Yorkshire at the time of

the Domesday Survey. David I. gave them the barony of Annan, in

Dumfriesshire. The original charter of this grant still exists in the

British Museum, witnessed by a galaxy of Norman names.[1017] Their

chief castles were at Annan and Lochmaben. At Annan, near the site of

a later castle, there is still a motte about 50 feet high, with a vast

ditch and some traces of a bailey (N.), called the Moat (N. S. A.). The

"terras de Moit et Bailyis, intra le Northgate," are mentioned in 1582.

South of the town of Lochmaben, on the N.W. side of the loch, is a fine

motte called Castle Hill, with some remains of masonry, which is still

pointed out as the original castle of the Bruces.[1018] (G.) The fine

motte and bailey at Moffat must also have been one of their castles, as

Moffat was one of their demesne lands. (Fig. 44.)

CATHCART.--Name territorial. Rainald de Cathcart witnesses a charter

(in the Paisley Register) in 1179. Near the old castle of Cathcart,

Lanark, is "an eminence called Court Knowe." (N. S. A.) As Mr Neilson

has shown, these court knowes and court hills are generally disused

mottes. The name Rainald is clearly Norman.

CHEYNE.--This family is first known in 1258, but had then been long

settled in Scotland, and were hereditary sheriffs of Banffshire.

Chalmers only mentions their manor of Inverugie, in Aberdeenshire.

Behind the ruins of Inverugie Castle rises a round flat-topped hill,

which was the Castle Hill or Mote Hill of former days. (N. S. A.)

COLVILLE.--Appears in Scotland in the reign of Malcolm IV., holding

the manors of Heton and Oxnam, in Roxburgh. About 1/4 mile from Oxnam

(which was a barony) is a moated mound called Galla Knowe. (O.M., C.,

and N.) Hailes identified the castle in Teviotdale, captured and burnt

by Balliol in 1333, with that of Oxnam.[1019] Le Mote de Oxnam is

mentioned in 1424 (N.).

[Illustration: FIG. 44.--SCOTTISH MOTTE-CASTLES. Annan. Moffat. Duffus.

Liddesdale.]

CUMYN, or COMYN.--The first of this family came to Scotland as the

chancellor of David I.[1020] First seated at Linton Roderick, in

Roxburghshire, where there is a rising ground, surrounded formerly

by a foss, the site of the original castle; (G.) a description

which seems to suggest a motte. William the Lion gave the Cumyns

Kirkintilloch in Dumbarton, and we afterwards find them at Dalswinton

in Dumfriesshire, and Troqueer in Kirkcudbright. At Kirkintilloch the

O.M. shows a square mount concentrically placed in a square enceinte.

The enclosure was apparently one of the forts on the wall of Agricola,

but the writer on Kirkintilloch in the N. S. A. suspected that it had

been transformed into a castle by the Cumyns. At Dalswinton the O.M.

shows a motte, and calls it the "site of Cumyn's Castle." At Troqueer,

"directly opposite the spot on the other side the river where Cumyn's

Castle formerly stood is a mote of circular form and considerable

height." (N. S. A.) The Cumyn who held Kirkintilloch in 1201, was made

Earl of Buchan, and held the vast district of Badenoch, or the great

valley of the Spey. The N. S. A. gives many descriptions of remains

in this region which are suggestive of motte-castles; we can only

name the most striking: Ruthven, "a castle reared by the Comyns on a

green conical mound on the S. bank of the Spey, thought to be partly

artificial," now occupied by ruined barracks; Dunmullie, in the parish

of Duthill, where "there can be traced vestiges of a motte surrounded

by a ditch, on which, according to tradition, stood the castle of the

early lords"; Crimond, where Cumyn had a castle, and where there is

a small round hill called Castle Hill; and Ellon, where the Earl of

Buchan had his head court, on a small hill which has now disappeared,

but which was anciently known as the moot-hill of Ellon. Saisin of the

earldom was given on this hill in 1476. (N. S. A.)

CUNNINGHAM.--Warnebald, who came from the north of England, was a

follower of the Norman, Hugh de Morville, who gave him the lands of

Cunningham, in Ayrshire, from which the family name was taken. In the

parish of Kilmaurs, which is in the district of Cunningham, there is a

"mote," which may have been the castle of Warnebald; at any rate the

original manor place of Cunningham was in this parish. It is of course

possible that this motte may have been originally a De Morville castle.

DOUGLAS.--Name territorial; progenitor was a Fleming, who received

lands on the Douglas water, in Lanark, in the middle of the 12th

century. In the park of Douglas, to the east of the modern castle, is

a mound called Boncastle, but we are unable to state certainly that it

is a motte. Lag Castle, in the parish of Dunscore, "has a moat or court

hill a little to the east." (N. S. A.: shown in Grose's picture.) It

must have been originally Douglas land, as in 1408 it was held by an

armour-bearer of Douglas.

DURAND.--Clearly a Norman name, corrupted into Durham. The family were

seated at Kirkpatrick Durham in the 13th century. There is or was a

motte at Kirkpatrick.[1021]

DURWARD.--This family was descended from Alan de Lundin, who was

dur-ward or door-keeper to the king about 1233. They possessed a wide

domain in Aberdeenshire, and had a castle at Lumphanan, where Edward I.

stayed in 1296. There is a round motte in the Peel Bog at Lumphanan,

surrounded by a moat, which was fed by a sluice from the neighbouring

burn. There were ruins in masonry on the top some hundred years ago.

The writer of the N. S. A. account of this place, with remarkable

shrewdness, conjectures that a wooden castle on this mound was the

ancient residence of the Durwards, superseded in the 15th century by

a building of stone, and that it has nothing to do with Macbeth, whose

burial-place is said to be a cairn in the neighbourhood.[1022]

FITZ ALAN.--This is the well-known ancestor of the House of Stuart,

Walter, a cadet of a great Norman family in Shropshire, who is said to

have obtained lands in Scotland in Malcolm Canmore's time. Renfrew was

one of his seats, and Inverwick, in Haddington, another. Renfrew Castle

is entirely destroyed, but the description of the site, on a small

hill, ditched round, called Castle Hill, strongly suggests a motte. The

keep of Inverwick stands on a natural motte of rock.[1023] Dunoon was

one of their castles, near to which "stood the Tom-a-mhoid, or Hill of

the court of justice" (G.), possibly an ancient motte.[1024] Dunoon

Castle, however, itself stands on a motte, partly artificial and partly

carved out of a headland. (N.)

FLEMING.--There were many Flemings among the followers of David I., and

eventually the name stuck to their descendants as a surname. Baldwin

the Fleming obtained lands at Biggar, in Lanarkshire. There is a motte

at the west end of the town of Biggar, 36 feet high. Biggar was the

head of a barony. (N. S. A. and N.) Colban the Fleming settled at

Colbantown, now Covington, Lanarkshire, where there is a motte (N.).

Robert the Fleming has left a well-preserved oblong motte at Roberton,

in Lanark, which was a barony, and where the _moit_ was spoken of in

1608. (N.)

GRAHAM.--Came from England under David I., and received lands in

Lothian. A Graham was lord of Tarbolton, in Ayrshire, in 1335, so it

is possible that the motte at that place, on which stood formerly the

chief messuage of the barony of Tarbolton, was one of their castles (N.

S. A.), but it may have been older.

HAMILTON.--It is not certain that the Hamiltons came to Scotland before

1272. King Robert I. gave them the barony of Cadzow, Lanark, which had

originally been a royal seat. In Hamilton Park there is a mote hill,

which was the site of the chief messuage of this barony (N.). It was

formerly surrounded by the town of Hamilton. (N. S. A.) It is of course

possible that this motte may be much older than the Hamiltons, as the

site of an originally royal castle.

HAY.--First appears in the 12th century, as butler to Malcolm IV. The

family first settled in Lothian, where they had lands at Lochorworth.

The Borthwick family, who got this estate by marriage, obtained a

license from James I. about 1430 to build a castle "on the mote of

Locherwart," and to this castle they gave their own name. (N. S. A.)

No doubt it was the original motte of the Hays. King William gave the

Hays the manor of Errol, in Perthshire, which was made into a barony.

Here is or was the mote of Errol, "a round artificial mound about 20

feet high, and 30 feet in diameter at the top; the platform at the top

surrounded with a low turf wall, and the whole enclosed with a turf

wall at the base, in the form of an equilateral triangle." (N. S. A.;

evidently a triangular bailey.) It is called the Law Knoll, and is

spoken of as a _fortalicium_ in 1546. (N.)

LENNOX.--The earls of Lennox are descended from Arkel, an Englishman,

who received from Malcolm Canmore lands in Dumbartonshire. At Catter,

near the Earl's castle, is a large artificial mound.[1025]

LOCKHART.--Stevenston, in Ayrshire, takes its name from Stephen

Loccard, and Symington, in Lanark, from his son (?), Simon Loccard.

At Stevenson there was formerly a castle, and there still (1845) is

a Castle Hill. Stevenston was given by Richard Morville to Stephen

Loccard about 1170. (N. S. A.) At Symington there was formerly a round

mound, called Law Hill, at the foot of the village, but it has been

levelled. (N. S. A.)

LOGAN.--A Robert Logan witnesses a charter of William the Lion, and

appears later as Dominus Robertus de Logan. The name Robert shows his

Norman origin. At Drumore, near Logan (parish of Kirkmaiden, Wigton),

there was a castle, and there is still a court hill or mote.[1026]

Another mote, at Myroch, in the same parish, is mentioned by Mr Neilson

as the site of the chief messuage of the barony of Logan.

LOVEL.--Settled at Hawick, Roxburghshire. The mote of Hawick, from the

picture in Scott's _Border Antiquities_, seems to be a particularly

fine one. Hawick was a barony, and Le Moit is mentioned in 1511. (N.)

LYLE, or LISLE.--The castle of this Norman family was at Duchal,

Renfrewshire. The plan is clearly that of a motte and bailey, but the

motte is of natural rock.[1027]

MALE, now MELVILLE.--Settled in Haddingtonshire under David I., and

called their seat Melville. Melville Castle is modern. They afterwards

obtained by marriage lands on the Bervie River, in the Mearns. Dr

Christison's map shows a motte near the mouth of the Bervie.

MAXWELL.--Maccus, son of Unwin[1028] (evidently of Scandinavian

origin), received lands on the Tweed from David I., and called his seat

Maccusville, corrupted into Maxwell. There is a motte at Maxwell, near

Kelso. (N.) Maxton, in Roxburghshire, takes its name from him, and

there is a motte called Ringley Hall, on the Tweed, in this parish. (C.

and N. S. A.)

MONTALT, or MOWAT.--Robert de Montalto (Mold, in Flintshire) witnesses

a charter of David I. The family settled in Cromarty. Le Mote at

Cromarty is mentioned in 1470. (N.)

MONTGOMERY.--This family is undoubtedly descended from some one of the

sons of the great Earl Roger of Shrewsbury, settled in Scotland after

the ruin of his family in England. Robert de Montgomerie received

the manor of Eaglesham, Renfrew, from Fitz Alan, the High Steward of

Scotland. The principal messuage of this manor was at Polnoon, 1/2

mile S.E. of Eaglesham. Here Sir John Montgomerie built the castle of

Polnoon about 1388. (N. S. A.) The O.M. seems to show that the ruins

of this castle stand on a motte, probably the original castle of

Montgomerie.

MORVILLE.--Hugh de Morville was a Northamptonshire baron, the life-long

friend of David I.[1029] He founded one of the most powerful families

in the south of Scotland, though after three generations their lands

passed to heiresses, and their chief seat is not even known by name.

But Mr Neilson states that Darnhall, in Peebles, was the head of their

"Black Barony," and that there is a motte there. As Hugh de Morville

gave the church of Borgue to Dryburgh Abbey about 1150, it is probable

that the motte at Boreland of Borgue was one of his castles. The

barony of Beith, in Ayr, given by Richard de Morville to the Abbey of

Kilwinning, has also a motte, which may be reckoned to be the site of

a De Morville castle. Largs, in Ayr, belonged to the De Morvilles, and

has a Castle Hill near the village, which appears to be a motte. (G.)

MOWBRAY.--This well-known Norman family also sent a branch to Scotland.

Amongst other places, about which we have no details, they held

Eckford, in Roxburghshire. In this parish, near the ancient mansion,

is an artificial mount called Haughhead Kipp. (N. S. A.) This seems a

possible motte, but its features are not described.

MURRAY.--Freskin the Fleming came to Scotland under David I., and

received from that king lands in Moray. He built himself a castle

at Duffus, in Elgin, which is on the motte-and-bailey plan.[1030]

The stone keep now on the motte appears to be of the 14th century.

Freskin's posterity took the name of De Moravia, or Moray. (Fig. 44.)

OLIPHANT, or OLIFARD.--Cambuslang, in Lanark, belonged to Walter

Olifard, Justiciary of Lothian in the time of Alexander II. About a

mile E. of the church is a circular mound 20 feet high. It was here

that the Oliphants' castle of Drumsagard formerly stood. (N. S. A.)

Drumsagard was a barony. (N.)

DE QUINCY.--Obtained from William the Lion the manors of Travernant, in

East Lothian, and Leuchars, in Fife. Near the village of Leuchars is

a motte with some slight remains of a stone keep, a deep well in the

centre, and an entrenched bailey, known as the site of the castle of

Leuchars.[1031]

ROSS.--Godfrey de Ros, a vassal of Richard de Morville, held of him the

lands of Stewarton, in Ayr. The _caput_ of the lordship was Castletown,

where Le Mote is spoken of in 1451 (N. and C.). The De Ros were also

the first lords of the barony of Sanquhar. A little lower down the

river Nith than the later castle of Sanquhar is a mote called Ryehill,

and a place anciently manorial. (N.)

SOMERVILLE.--William de Somerville was a Norman to whom David I.

gave the manor of Carnwath, in Lanarkshire. There is a very perfect

entrenched motte at Carnwath (N. S. A. and O.M.), and Le Moit de

Carnwath is mentioned in 1599. (N.)

DE SOULIS.--Followed David I. from Northamptonshire into Scotland, and

received Liddesdale, in Roxburghshire, from him. The motte and bailey

of his original castle still remain, very near the more celebrated but

much later Hermitage Castle.[1032] (Fig. 44.)

VALOIGNES.--Philip de Valoignes and his son William were each

successively chamberlains of Scotland.[1033] One of their estates was

Easter Kilbride, in Lanarkshire, where they had a castle. In this

parish is an artificial mount of earth, with an oval area on top, about

1/4 mile from the present house of Torrance. (N. S. A.)

VAUX, or DE VALLIBUS.--Settled in Scotland under William the Lion. Held

the manors of Dirleton and Golyn, in East Lothian. Dirleton has been

transformed into an Edwardian castle, but from the pictures it appears

to stand on a natural motte of rock. But about 3 miles from Dirleton

the O.M. shows a large motte called Castle Hill, which may possibly be

the original castle of the De Vaux.

WALLACE, or WALLENSIS.--Richard Walensis was the first of this family,

and acquired lands in Ayrshire in David I.'s time. He named his seat

Riccardton, after himself, and the remains of his motte are still

there, a small oval motte called Castle Hill, on which the church of

Riccarton now stands, but which is recognised as having been a "mote

hill." (G.)

To this list must be added a number of royal castles known to have been

built in the 12th century, which, as they were built on mottes, must in

the first instance have been wooden castles.

BANFF.--It seems clear that Banff Castle had a motte, because the

doggerel rhymes of Arthur Johnstone in 1642 say:

A place was near which was a field until

Our ancestors did raise it to a hill;

A stately castle also on it stood.

The _Gazetteer_ says: "The citadel occupied a mount, originally at the

end though now near the middle of the town." The site is still called

Castle Hill. (N. S. A.)

CRAIL, Fife.--The O.M. does not show a motte here. The N. S. A. says

"there was a royal residence here, upon an eminence overlooking the

harbour." That this "eminence" was a motte seems clear from the

_Register of the Great Seal_, quoted by Mr Neilson, which speaks of "Le

Moitt olim Castrum" in 1573.

CUPAR.--There seem to be two mottes here, both raised on a natural

"esker"; the one formerly called the Castle Hill is now called the

School Hill, the school having been built upon it. The other and higher

hill is called the Moot Hill, and is said to be the place where the

earls of Fife used to dispense justice. (N. S. A.) Mr Neilson states

that both are mentioned in the _Registrum_.

DUMFRIES.--Here there were two mottes, one being now the site of a

church, the other, called Castle Dykes, a short distance S. of the

town, on the opposite side of the river. Both no doubt were royal

castles, and Mr Neilson has suggested that as an _old castlestead_

is spoken of in a charter of William the Lion, it implies that a new

castle had recently been built, possibly after the great destruction of

the royal castles in Galloway in 1174.[1034] The Castle Dykes appears

to be the later castle, as it is spoken of in the 16th century. (N.)

DUNSKEATH, Cromarty.--Built by William the Lion in 1179. The castle is

built on a small _moat_ overhanging the sea. (G.)

ELGIN.--Built by William the Lion on a small green hill called Lady

Hill, with conical and precipitous sides. (N. S. A. and G.)

FORFAR.--"The castle stood on a round hill to the N. of the town, and

must have been surrounded by water." (N. S. A.) It was destroyed in

1307. It is called Gallow Hill in the O.M., and is now occupied by

gasworks.

FORRES.--The plan in Chalmers' _Caledonia_ clearly shows a motte, to

which the town appears to have formed a bailey.

INVERNESS.--Built by David I. when he annexed Moray. The site is now

occupied by a gaol, but the O.M. shows it to have been a motte, which

is clearly depicted in old engravings.

INNERMESSAN.--As the lands here appear to have been royal property as

late as the time of David II., the large round motte here may have been

an early royal castle, a conjecture which finds some confirmation in

the name "Boreland of Kingston," which Pont places in the same parish.

(N. S. A.)

JEDBURGH.--Probably built by David I. The site, which is still

called Castle Hill, has been levelled and completely obliterated by

the building of a gaol. Yet an old plan of the town in 1762, in the

possession of the late Mr Laidlaw of Jedburgh, shows the outline of the

castle to have been exactly that of a motte and bailey, though, as no

hachures are given, it is not absolutely convincing.

KINCLEVEN, Perth.--The O.M. shows no earthworks connected with the

present castle, but on the opposite side of the river it places a motte

called Castle Hill, which may very likely be the site of the original

castle.

KIRKCUDBRIGHT.--Dr Christison marks a motte here, to the W. of the

town. The place is called Castle Dykes. Mr Coles says it has an oblong

central mound and a much larger entrenched area.[1035]

LANARK.--Ascribed traditionally to David I. "On a small artificially

shaped hill between the town and the river, at the foot of the street

called Castle Gate, and still bearing the name of Castle Hill, there

stood in former times beyond all doubt a royal castle." (N. S. A.) Mr

Neilson says, "It certainly bears out its reputation as an artificial

mound."

ROSEMARKIE, Cromarty.--Was made a royal burgh by Alexander II., so the

castle must have been originally royal. "Immediately above the town is

a mound of nearly circular form, and level on the top, which seems to

be artificial, and has always been called the Court Hill." (N. S. A.)

Even if we had no other evidence that motte-castles were of Norman

construction, this list would be very significant. But taken in

connection with the evidence for the Norman origin of the English,

Welsh, and Irish mottes, it supplies ample proof that in Scotland, as

elsewhere, the Norman and feudal settlement had its material guarantees

in the castles which were planted all over the land, and that these

castles were the simple structures of earth and wood, whose earthen

remains have been the cause of so much mystification.

The Early Norman Castles of the British Isles. · 第 11 / 15 章