III. THE DEFENCE.

Now I have a closing sentence or two to add about Paul's reason for

singling out love as the supreme possession.

It is a very remarkable reason. In a single word it is this: _it

lasts._ "Love," urges Paul, "never faileth." Then he begins again one

of his marvelous lists of the great things of the day, and exposes

them one by one. He runs over the things that men thought were going

to last, and shows that they are all fleeting, temporary, passing

away.

"Whether there be _prophecies_, they shall be done away." It was the

mother's ambition for her boy in those days that he should become a

prophet. For hundreds of years God had never spoken by means of any

prophet, and at that time the prophet was greater than the king. Men

waited wistfully for another messenger to come, and hung upon his lips

when he appeared, as upon the very voice of God. Paul says, "Whether

there be prophecies, they shall fail." The Bible is full of

prophecies. One by one they have "failed"; that is, having been

fulfilled, their work is finished; they have nothing more to do now in

the world except to feed a devout man's faith.

Then Paul talks about _tongues_. That was another thing that was

greatly coveted. "Whether there be tongues, they shall cease." As we

all know, many many centuries have passed since tongues have been

known in this world. They have ceased. Take it in any sense you like.

Take it, for illustration merely, as languages in general--a sense

which was not in Paul's mind at all, and which though it cannot give

us the specific lesson, will point the general truth. Consider the

words in which these chapters were written--Greek. It has gone. Take

the Latin--the other great tongue of those days. It ceased long ago.

Look at the Indian language. It is ceasing. The language of Wales, of

Ireland, of the Scottish Highlands is dying before our eyes. The most

popular book in the English tongue at the present time, except the

Bible, is one of Dickens' works, his _Pickwick Papers_. It is largely

written in the language of London street-life; and experts assure us

that in fifty years it will be unintelligible to the average English

reader.

Then Paul goes farther, and with even greater boldness adds, "Whether

there be _knowledge_, it shall be done away." The wisdom of the

ancients, where is it? It is wholly gone. A schoolboy to-day knows

more than Sir Isaac Newton knew; his knowledge has vanished away. You

put yesterday's newspaper in the fire: its knowledge has vanished

away. You buy the old editions of the great encyclopædias for a few

cents: their knowledge has vanished away. Look how the coach has been

superseded by the use of steam. Look how electricity has superseded

that, and swept a hundred almost new inventions into oblivion. One of

the greatest living authorities, Sir William Thompson, said in

Scotland, at a meeting at which I was present, "The steam-engine is

passing away." "Whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away." At

every workshop you will see, in the back yard, a heap of old iron, a

few wheels, a few levers, a few cranks, broken and eaten with rust.

Twenty years ago that was the pride of the city. Men flocked in from

the country to see the great invention; now it is superseded, its day

is done. And all the boasted science and philosophy of this day will

soon be old.

In my time, in the university of Edinburgh, the greatest figure in the

faculty was Sir James Simpson, the discoverer of chloroform. Recently

his successor and nephew, Professor Simpson, was asked by the

librarian of the University to go to the library and pick out the

books on his subject (midwifery) that were no longer needed. His reply

to the librarian was this:

"Take every text-book that is more than ten years old and put it down

in the cellar."

Sir James Simpson was a great authority only a few years ago: men came

from all parts of the earth to consult him; and almost the whole

teaching of that time is consigned by the science of to-day to

oblivion. And in every branch of science it is the same. "Now we know

in part. We see through a glass darkly." Knowledge does not last.

Can you tell me anything that is going to last? Many things Paul did

not condescend to name. He did not mention money, fortune, fame; but

he picked out the great things of his time, the things the best men

thought had something in them, and brushed them peremptorily aside.

Paul had no charge against these things in themselves. All he said

about them was that they would not last. They were great things, but

not supreme things. There were things beyond them. What we are

stretches past what we do, beyond what we possess. Many things that

men denounce as sins are not sins; but they are temporary. And that is

a favorite argument of the New Testament. John says of the world, not

that it is wrong, but simply that it "passeth away." There is a great

deal in the world that is delightful and beautiful; there is a great

deal in it that is great and engrossing; but

The Greatest Thing In the World and Other Addresses · 第 32 / 124 题