CHAPTER V

TOURNAMENT AND CLUB MANAGEMENT

I wish an "Order of Play" could be used more at English tournaments.

That is to say, I wish matches could be arranged to take place at a

certain hour, following the plan adopted at Wimbledon and at all the

meetings on the Continent. Such an arrangement would greatly add to the

comfort and enjoyment of competitors, and would, I imagine, be a great

boon to the referee. Spectators, I know, would welcome it. I think a

time-table might prove unworkable where handicap events are concerned,

but in the case of open events I feel sure it could be introduced with

great advantage to all concerned. I have so often sat hour after hour at

a London tournament (having only entered for the open events), perhaps

playing one match, perhaps not playing at all. If I had been told

overnight that I should not be wanted, or exactly at what hour my match

would take place, it would have been so much more satisfactory and saved

so much wasted time. This waiting about takes away half the pleasure of

playing in London meetings. Even if there are good matches going on you

do not care to watch them incessantly; there may be a chance of your

playing off a tie, and it would tend to put your eye out. On one

occasion, having a long way to go to a tournament in which I was only

entered for the open mixed doubles, I telephoned to know whether I

should be wanted or not. "Well," replied the referee, "if I call you and

you are not on the ground, I shall scratch you. In your own interest you

had better come over." For my partner's sake, as well as my own, I was

bound to go. As I expected, I sat the whole afternoon and evening doing

absolutely nothing. When I begged to be allowed to play, as I had come

some distance for this one match, the referee examined his programme and

said, "Oh, it is quite impossible to-day. They have not played the round

in front of you yet!"

[Illustration: AFTER THE LADIES' FINAL AT WIMBLEDON: TEA ON THE LAWNS]

This sort of thing implies gross mismanagement, besides resulting in

unnecessary wear and tear for the competitors. If there was an order of

play arranged for each day, all the bother would be obviated. I believe

that business men who cannot get away in the early afternoon have their

matches timed and arranged for them. Why are not all competitors treated

alike?

While I am on this subject of "waiting about," let me say that I think

ladies do not take nearly enough care of themselves after playing. They

ought to wrap up well if they have not time to change before their next

match. Men are much more careful. They put on their coats immediately

they leave the court, and change their clothes as soon as they can. But

you will see girls chatting after a match, and even having tea, without

deigning to put on an extra wrap. It is courting disaster. The colds and

more dangerous ailments that arise from this little want of care

naturally afford people a line of attack when they object to girls

engaging in violent exercise.

You cannot be too careful after strenuous play. I am well aware that

ladies are catered for very badly at most of the tournaments in regard

to changing-room accommodation. Some places we have had to put up with

are disgraceful. I think most lady players will agree with me when I say

that Wimbledon and Queen's Club are about the only two grounds where you

can change with any degree of comfort. This is not right, and I am sure

if men had to experience the changing-room accommodation afforded for

our use there would not be many of them competing at tournaments. I

think the two clubs I have mentioned are the only two where we even get

a bathroom! Some tournaments provide a draughty tent for our use.

Moreover, there is generally only one dressing-room, and feminine

spectators often crowd round the one looking-glass, staring at the

players as if they were animals on show! It is sometimes even impossible

to sit down to rest after a hard and tiring contest.

I appeal to secretaries of tournaments for some reform. A number of lady

players have asked me to use this opportunity to point out some of our

most pressing grievances. I hope these remarks, which are none too

strong, may bear fruit. Visitors who come over from other countries are

always loud in their complaints, and I am not surprised. I believe the

Beckenham authorities are doing all they can to impart a little more

comfort to the ladies' changing and resting-room, and they have greatly

improved their accommodation. It is time other meetings followed their

example. At the seaside meetings it does not so much matter. Most of the

players stay near the ground and can go to their own rooms and be back

in time to play again, if necessary; but in London tournaments, where

there is often a long drive or train journey before one reaches home, it

is most important that there should be a good changing-room.

[ILLUSTRATION: A TOURNAMENT HOUSE-PARTY AT NEWCASTLE _Front row (left to

right_): THE LATE MISS C. MEYRE, MR. G.W. HILLYARD, MRS. HILLYARD, MRS.

LAMBERT CHAMBERS, MR. N.E. BROOKES, MR. A.J. ROBERTS]

There is another improvement which I feel sure would be greatly welcomed

by competitors, and that is a separate tea-tent for their use. Often a

player has only a few minutes to get her tea, and, with the general

public engaged in the same amiable pursuit, she is not able to be served

and has to go away tealess. If there were a competitors' tea-tent, a

player could obtain her tea in comfort when she wanted it.

Always bear in mind that a referee at a tournament has a most "worrying

time of it." Players can and should help to make his task lighter.

There are many ways in which they can assist to make the tournament as

successful as possible. One is by being punctual and ready dressed to

play when wanted, and another is by umpiring when they are disengaged

and have not an important match just coming on. "Taking the chair" may

help them not to dispute an umpire's decision when they are in court

themselves. They will realize how difficult umpiring is, and that bad as

umpires often are they are doing their best. To dispute a decision or to

argue with the umpire never helps matters; it usually makes him nervous.

A bad decision must be taken as a fortune of war, and borne in a

sportsmanlike manner. But you must never allow the crowd to influence

the umpire. It is a hopeless expedient, for many people who watch

matches are ignorant of the rules of the game.

Sometimes--I suppose it is Hobson's choice--an umpire is chosen from the

"gate." If he knows little or nothing of his duties the result is

disastrous. Should there be difficulty in getting an umpire who knows

something of his work, I think the match should take care of itself. I

have experienced umpires who do not even know how to score!

And now a word or two about _Clubs._ It is very difficult to manage a

lawn tennis club successfully; much tact is required. I think it is

almost impossible to prevent a club being "cliquey," and I should always

advise a player who wishes to improve her game to join one which is more

concerned with its tennis than its social side. Some clubs still use the

game for a garden-party, where long trailing skirts, sunshades, and

basket chairs predominate. Perhaps a game or two is played in the cool

of the evening. That sort of club should be avoided if you are a keen

and enthusiastic player.

The committee of a club should be a small one, consisting of members

who are devoted to the best interests of the game. Their aim should be

to keep in touch with all the latest developments, and above all to keep

up to date, advancing with the times. A committee sometimes embraces old

supporters of the club who have been members for years and years. They

have old-fashioned ideas, are very conservative, and do not like

innovations of any sort, even if changes are obviously necessary for the

benefit of the game. A committee should see that their club has a good

match-card, for inter-club contests are excellent practice for the

members, and there is nothing like fostering a spirit of friendly

rivalry. Care should be taken to choose players who make a good pair and

combine well together. A committee should do all in its power to improve

the standard of play, and that can only be accomplished by having

well-tended courts and good balls. Many clubs are not equipped with

side-posts for the single game. That is a great mistake, because a

player will practise without them in her club, and then when she enters

for a tournament will have to use them. It is bound to put her off her

game. Such details make all the difference between good and bad

management of a club.

[Illustration: "MY SISTERS AND MYSELF" _A picture postcard sent to Mrs.

Lambert-Chambers by Miss May Sutton from her home in California_.]

It is an excellent plan for members of the committee to drop in at some

of the tournaments and see how things are done there. Developments may

have occurred of which they know nothing, and they could pick up many a

wrinkle by a tour of inspection. Before one secretary of a fairly large

tournament went to Wimbledon he had never seen a canvas background.

Lawn Tennis for Ladies · 第 5 / 7 章