PATRICK HENRY ADDRESSING THE VIRGINIA ASSEMBLY IN 1765

Henry, supporting the resolutions to resist the Stamp Act, at one point

exclaimed, “Caesar had his Brutus, Charles the First his Cromwell,

and George the Third--” “Treason! treason!” shouted the Speaker of

the Assembly. “Treason! treason!” shouted the members--“and,” Henry

continued, “George the Third may profit by their example. If this be

treason, make the most of it!”]

Here we have at last a cradle of liberty; for the personal rights

exacted by the nobles passed over to freemen, and in course of time all

Englishmen became freemen. It was centuries before the kings at last

gave way to the principle that the people through their representatives

in Parliament ruled even the Crown; and in the process King Charles

I lost his head, and King James II lost his throne. In the end, all

the men and women of the realm were recognized as having the personal

rights expressed in royal charters and acts of Parliament, which set

them free from arbitrary taxes, arbitrary arrests, and arbitrary

punishments.

They were entitled also to a tradition of common law, based on ideas of

freedom, enforced for their benefit by independent courts and protected

by trial by jury. Hence the England of the seventeenth century, from

which the first colonists proceeded to North America, was that part

of the globe in which law-abiding men and women had the largest

opportunity of living their own lives, enjoying the fruits of their own

labor, and dwelling under their own government.

_Colonial Liberty_

[Illustration: HISTORIC BRIDGE, CONCORD, MASS.

Showing battleground, and, across the bridge, the statue of the Minute

Man by the sculptor, Daniel Chester French]

Writers often speak of our present American system of government as

founded upon the British practices of personal liberty and local self

government and a free parliament. This is not accurate: Both our

state and federal governments have borrowed little directly from the

British parliamentary governing system. We have made our constitutions

while Great Britain had none; we have organized a system of cabinet

government, very different from that of parliamentary responsibility;

we expanded our suffrage, and England slowly followed on that highway

of liberty.

[Illustration: BUNKER HILL MONUMENT

Charlestown, Mass. A granite obelisk, 221 feet high, erected 1825-42 to

commemorate the Battle of Bunker Hill, June 17, 1775]

The truth is that the present government of Great Britain and the

present government of the United States of America, with their personal

liberties, both go back to a common source--the English government of

the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. It is a great mistake for

us to think of Queen Elizabeth as a sovereign of a foreign country;

or of the King James version of the Scriptures as something outside

the United States; or of Shakespeare and Milton simply as “British

poets.” We Americans have the same heritage in everything that was

great and glorious in the British Isles, previous to colonization, as

those that remained upon the soil, and in many respects we have made

more improvement on those old models than our kin across the sea.

The English had to struggle for nearly a century, from 1604 to 1688,

against their kings, who wanted to turn the clock backward and take

government out of the hands of the people. At that time the Colonies

were very nearly independent little republics, who loved their English

kings in proportion as those sovereigns kept their hands off. Except

for the curse of negro slavery, which was allowed to get a firm grip on

the body politic, the Colonies down to Revolutionary times were freer,

happier and more prosperous than the mother country, and that was

the main reason for the Revolution. Why should people who were doing

so well in managing themselves continue in the leading strings of a

government that saved its democracy in England for the higher classes?

The Colonies were not little political heavens. Their ideas of liberty

did not extend to Indians, or Negroes, or Quakers. Nevertheless, in the

main, they stood stoutly for freedom of person, freedom of judicial

trial, freedom of legislative bodies; and they were about half a

century earlier than England in establishing (in the famous Zenger

case of 1734) the priceless right publicly to criticize their own

governments. John Wise, who was one of them, had a right to say that

they “hate an arbitrary power (politically considered) as they hate the

devil.”

_Hartford, the “Birthplace of American Democracy”_

The first written constitution in history that was adopted by a people

and that also organized a government, “The Fundamental Orders of

Connecticut,” was drawn up in 1639 by freemen of Windsor, Hartford

and Wethersfield. Under this law the people of Connecticut lived for

nearly two centuries. The twelve articles it comprised expressed

“pure democracy acting through representation, and imposing organic

limitations.”

“Here is the first practical assertion of the right of the people, not

only to choose, but to limit the powers of their rulers--an assertion

that lies at the foundation of the American system. It is on the banks

of the Connecticut, under the mighty preaching of Thomas Hooker, and

in the constitution to which he gave life, if not form, that we draw

the first breath of that atmosphere which is now so familiar to us. The

birthplace of American Democracy is Hartford.”

[Illustration: PAUL REVERE]

[Illustration: READING THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE FROM THE STATE

HOUSE, BOSTON]

By common consent, the period when these principles of liberty of

person and of government were first clearly impressed on the world was

in the American Revolution, which deserves to be called the cradle

of modern liberty. When things grew squally in the Colonies, our

forefathers insisted that their brand of liberty was better than the

British kind, and they began to draw up lists of rights and grievances,

especially in the Stamp Act Congress of 1765. The new states of the

American Union, as they were organized, bound themselves to observe

Bills of Rights containing such stirring principles as that, “All

power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people.”

“All elections ought to be free, and that all men having sufficient

evidence of permanent interest with, and attached to the community,

have the right of suffrage.”--“The freedom of the press is one of the

great bulwarks of liberty.”--“All men are equally entitled to the free

exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience.”

By far the most renowned statement of the noble rights of liberty

was the Declaration of Independence. At the time, people were most

interested in the classified indictment of the king of Great Britain

for interfering with American liberty. The world, however, has long

agreed that the big memorable, permanent thing in that Declaration is

found in the three magnificent sentences that fulfill the injunction

of the Liberty Bell, to “proclaim liberty throughout all the land, to

all the inhabitants thereof.” Those imperishable sentences are: “We

hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,

that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,

that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,--That

to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving

their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever

any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the

Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new

Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its

powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their

Safety and Happiness.”

[Illustration: ORIGINAL INDEPENDENCE HALL]

[Illustration: INDEPENDENCE HALL TODAY

The Mentor: The Cradle of Liberty, Vol. 6, Num. 10, Serial No. 158, July 1, 1918 · 第 22 / 35 题