Let us now summon, as first in order, the name that heads the list of

the actors above given. Henry Placide enjoyed in public estimation

a fame worthy and well deserved. He was an actor of the old school,

and his conceptions were the fruit of appreciative and careful

study; his acting was a lucid and harmonious interpretation of his

author; and his elocution, clear and resonant, was the speech of a

scholar and a gentleman. The artistic sense was never forgotten in his

delineations, and his name on the bills was a guaranty of intellectual

pleasure. He was not broadly funny like Burton, or Holland; but those

who remember his _Sir Harcourt Courtley_, his _Jean Jacques François

Antoine Hypolite de Frisac_, in "Paris and London," and his _Clown_,

in Shakespeare's "Twelfth Night," will not deny that he was the owner

of a rich vein of eccentric humor, and that he worked his possession

effectually. He was an expert in the Gallic parts where the speech is a

struggle between French and English, and, indeed, since his departure

they, too, have vanished from the stage. But those who saw him as

_Haversac_, in "The Old Guard"; as _The Tutor_, in "To Parents and

Guardians"; or as _Monsieur Dufard_, in "The First Night," will bear

witness to his inimitable manner, and to his facile blending of the

grave and gay. We shall never forget how, in the last-named character

(_Mons. Dufard_), having engaged his daughter for a "first appearance,"

and having declared his own ability to manage the drum in the orchestra

on the occasion, he, suddenly, during the mimic rehearsal, at an

allusion in the text to sunrise, stamped violently on the stage; and to

the startled manager's exclamation of "What's that!" serenely replied:

"Zat ees ze cannon vich announce ze brek of day--I play him on ze

big drum in ze night." In choleric old men Placide was unsurpassed.

All the touches that go toward the creation of a grim, irascible,

thwarted, bluff old gentleman, he commanded at will. His _Colonel

Hardy_, in "Paul Pry," for instance, what an example was that! I hear

him, now, at the close of the comedy, when things had drifted to a

happy anchorage--hear him saying in reply to the soothing remark: "Why,

Colonel, you've every thing your own way,"--"Yes, I know I have every

thing my own way; but ---- it, I hav'n't _my own way_ of having it!"

His repertory covered a wide range; and we retain vivid recollections

of his _Sir Peter Teazle_, his _Doctor Ollapod_, and his _Silky_; the

last in "The Road to Ruin," in which comedy, by the way, we remember

seeing Placide, Blake, Burton, Lester, Bland, and Mrs. Hughes; truly a

phenomenal cast.

Such, briefly sketched, was the actor who constituted one of Burton's

strongest pillars. For some years he played at no other theatre in New

York. He gave enjoyment to thousands, and in dramatic annals his name

and achievements have distinguished and honorable record. As one of the

many who remain to own their debt of pleasure and instruction, the

present writer pays this tribute to the genius and memory of Henry

Placide.[7]

[7] "When Edwin Forrest was in Europe on a visit, he was asked whom he

deemed the best American actor; he promptly and unequivocally replied:

'Henry Placide is unquestionably the best general actor on the American

boards, and I doubt whether his equal can be found in England.'"--HENRY

DICKINSON STONE'S "Theatrical Reminiscences."

We now summon another name from the famous corps, for the purpose of

analysis, since we should be ill content with the cold respect of a

passing glance at an artist so celebrated as was William Rufus Blake. We

can recall no actor of the past, and we know of but one in the present,

comparable with Blake in certain lines of old men--certainly in the rôle

of tender pathos like _Old Dornton_, and in the portrayal of a sweetly

noble nature framed in venerable simplicity, as in _Jesse Rural_, he had

no equal; and it is simply truth to say that with him departed from the

stage that unique, all-affecting, wondrous embodiment of _Geoffrey

Dale_, in "The Last Man."

The characteristics of Blake's power were a broad heartiness, suggestive

sentiment, and eloquent idealization. These traits informed respectively

the parts he essayed, and gave to each in turn rare flow of spirit,

richness of color, and poetic fervor. For the verbal expression of these

salient elements, he possessed a tuneful voice, which rose or fell as

the sway of feeling dictated, and his delivery was singularly felicitous

in tone and emphasis. Nor was he lacking in a humor at once subtle and

delicate, happily evinced in his acting of _Mr. Primrose_, in the

comedietta of "Bachelors' Torments."

Those who saw Blake at the period of which we are writing, found it hard

to believe that the _Sir Anthony Absolute_ of aldermanic proportions

before them was once a slender young man and played light comedy! Yet so

it was. Very old play-goers will recollect the Chatham Garden theatre,

and perhaps some tenacious memory bears record of having seen Blake

there in the long ago; for there he first appeared to a New York

audience, in 1824, playing _Frederick_, in Colman's "Poor Gentleman." We

never saw him earlier than at Burton's, and then with added years had

come a rotundity of person which, however unobjectionable in the famous

impersonations of his prime, was not, it must be confessed, the ideal

physique of light comedy; so his _Frederick_ had long departed and his

_Sir Robert Bramble_ had appeared.

The first time we saw Blake was in "The Road to Ruin," and the

impression he made has never been effaced. We were young, it is true,

and sentimental, and easily moved; but our heart tells us that the

effect would be the same could we see the actor in the play to-morrow.

We have read since of the extraordinary sensation produced by the great

Munden in the part of _Old Dornton_; but we have an abiding faith that

the acting of the famous Englishman would have been no revelation to

Blake; and we cannot, indeed, conceive of any added touch that would not

have impaired, rather than heightened, the latter's superb delineation.

But Blake's portrayal of the outraged, doting, fond, tender father, is,

like his _Jesse Rural_, so fresh in the memory of living persons, that

we feel it to be needless to descant upon its beauties. Few will forget

the years of his last and long engagement at Wallack's--a fitting crown

for a great artistic career. Blake played many parts and rarely touched

but to adorn. Even his _Malvolio_, had it not been for the advent of

Charles Fisher (who was born in yellow stockings and cross-gartered),

would have passed into history as a carefully conceived and highly

finished performance. Whenever we see Mr. John Gilbert we are reminded

of Blake. There is a grace of action, a courtliness of manner,

inseparable from Gilbert, which lends to all his efforts an elevating

charm, a feature Blake did not possess in like degree. But the two

actors belonged to the same school; their traditions will be much akin;

and neither loses in being spoken of in the same breath, and with the

same accent of admiration.

Following Placide and Blake is the name of an actor better remembered

than either, and whose death is of comparatively recent date. We refer

to John Brougham, who for thirty years and more was one of New York's

prime favorites, and his name is associated with many of the drama's

brightest and worthiest triumphs. His inexhaustible flow of spirits, in

his best days, pervaded all his acting, and invested the most

unattractive part with an alluring charm, as many a prosaic spot in

nature becomes enchanted land by the music of falling waters. Add to

this exuberant vitality a rich endowment of mother wit; a bright

intelligence; keen sympathy and appreciation, and rare personal

magnetism, and you have before you "glorious John," whose hearty voice

it was always a pleasure to hear, and whose face, beaming with humor,

was always welcomed with delight.

[Illustration: MR. BURTON AS CAPTAIN CUTTLE.]

Brougham was Burton's stage manager in 1848, and his dramatization of

"Dombey and Son" was first produced in that year. The representation of

this play established the Chambers Street Theatre, drew attention to the

talents of the stock company, and put money into Burton's purse. If

theatres, like other things, succeed either by hook or crook, as the

saying is, surely it was by hook that the manager won fame and fortune,

for the digit of _Captain Cuttle_ held sway like a wizard's wand. The

temptation to dwell here on this renowned Burtonian impersonation is

hard to resist; but we must be patient and bide our time.

Brougham played _Bunsby_ and _Bagstock_, investing the oracular

utterances of the tar, and the roughness and toughness and "devilish"

slyness of the _Major_, with a humor and spirit all his own. We laugh

outright as we think of that scene where _Cuttle_ is being rapidly

reduced to agony and despair by _Mrs. MacStinger_, and is rescued

therefrom by _Bunsby_, who, with a hoarse "Avast, my lass; avast!"

advances solemnly on the redoubtable female, and with a soothing gravity

ejects the entire _MacStinger_ family, following in the rear

himself--_Cuttle_ meanwhile gazing in speechless astonishment at the

unexpected succor, until the door is closed; and then, drawing an

immense breath, and turning toward the audience his inimitable face,

exclaims in a tone of profound respect and admiration: "There's wisdom!"

It was a great treat to see Burton and Brougham together. The two actors

were so ready, so full of wit, so alive to each other's points and

by-play, that any fanciful interpolation of the text, or humorous

impromptu, by the one, was instantly responded to by the other; and the

house was often thrown into convulsions of merriment by these purely

unpremeditated sallies. This was notably the case in the afterpiece of

"An Unwarrantable Intrusion"--committed by Mr. Brougham upon Mr.

Burton--when in the tag the comedians suddenly assumed their own

persons, and, addressing each other by their proper names, engaged in a

droll colloquy respecting the dilemma of having nothing to say to

conclude the piece; and each suggesting in turn something that ought to

or might be said to an audience under such peculiar and distressing

circumstances,--the audience meanwhile in a state of hilarious

excitement, drinking in every sparkling jest and repartee, and wishing

the flow of humor would last forever.

And here we are reminded of an incident not down in the bills, which

furnished an audience with an unlooked-for and affecting episode. It

occurred during the performance of Colman's comedy of "John Bull,"

produced for the benefit of a favorite actor; Burton playing _Job

Thornberry_, and Brougham, who had volunteered for the occasion,

appearing in his capital rôle of _Dennis Brulgruddery_. Brougham was no

longer with Burton--an estrangement existed between them of which the

public was aware--and the conjunction of the two actors naturally

awakened a lively interest. It chances in the comedy that _Mary

Thornberry_ finds a refuge in her distress at the "Red Cow," and is

greatly befriended by _Dennis_. Her father, discovering her there, and

grateful for the service rendered, exclaims: "You have behaved like an

emperor to her. Give me your hand, landlord!" Now, in the play, the

reply of _Dennis_ is: "Behaved!--(_refusing his hand_)--Arrah, now, get

away with your blarney,"--but Brougham paused for a moment before

Burton's outstretched hand, and then, as if yielding to an impulse,

stretched forth his, and the two actors stood with clasped hands amidst

an outburst of applause that fairly shook the building. Of course they

were "called out" at the close, and Brougham, in the course of a

felicitous little speech, remarked--alluding, perhaps, to the success of

his Lyceum not being all he could wish--that he had "lately run off the

track"; to which Burton, in his turn, responded by saying: "Mr. Brougham

says he has 'run off the track.' Well, he _has_ run off the track; but

he hasn't burst his boiler yet!" At this speech the enthusiasm of the

audience knew no bounds; and indeed, with the exception of Mary Taylor's

farewell benefit, we can recall no theatrical occasion where more

genuine feeling was manifested.

But to return to "Dombey and Son." Mrs. Brougham was the original

_Susan Nipper_, and played the part acceptably; but all previous

_Nippers_ suffered eclipse when Caroline Chapman appeared at a later

date, giving us a _Susan_ that seemed to have sprung full-_Nippered_

from the head of Boz himself. Her inimitable acting and ring of

delivery were like a new light turned on the scene. Her flow of

spirit and alert movement, her independent air and saucy glance, her

not-to-be-put-down-under-any-circumstances manner,--all was freshness

and sparkle, and her presence was as welcome to the audience as a

summer shower to drooping wayside flowers. Miss Chapman was a great

acquisition to Burton's, and her bright individuality shone in all her

assumptions. Her line was the stage soubrette, a specialty which she

lifted entirely out of the commonplace and informed it with force and

distinction. It is a pleasure to place on record the memory of happy

hours that we owe to the performances of Caroline Chapman.

The original _Toots_ was Oliver B. Raymond, whom we never saw. T. B.

Johnston was his successor, and as that admirable comedian never did any

thing unacceptably, his _Toots_ was a memorable effort; and had _Uriah

Heep_ not followed we should have been satisfied with his _Toots_; but

when "Copperfield" was produced and Johnston appeared as _Heep_, it

seemed as if he was born for that and nothing else. Now that we think of

it, it seems to us, as we recall Johnston, that nature had peculiarly

fitted him for the delineation of many of Dickens's characters.

Something in his spare figure, his grotesqueness of demeanor, his

whimsical aspect, his odd manner of speech, continually suggested a

flavor of Boz; and whether as _Toots_, or _Heep_, or _Newman Noggs_, he

seemed to have glided into his element, and was _en rapport_ with the

great novelist.

We must not forget, in writing of "Dombey and Son," to note how much its

attraction was enhanced by the assumption, in 1849, of the part of

_Edith_ by Mrs. Josephine Russell (the present Mrs. Hoey). Laurence

Hutton, referring to the event in his volume of "Plays and Players,"

says: "Up to the time of her assumption of the rôle, _Edith_, in

Brougham's version of the story, was comparatively a secondary part, and

one to which but little attention had been paid either by performer or

audience. Mrs. Russell, however, by her refined and elegant manner,

brought _Edith_ and herself into favor and prominence. She made of

_Edith_ more than Brougham himself ever imagined could be made; and

_Edith_ made her a reputation and a success on the New York stage,

which, until her honorable and much-to-be-regretted retirement, she ever

sustained.[8]

[8] The first appearance of Mrs. Russell (whose maiden name was Shaw)

in Chambers Street was made September 3, 1849.

We have dwelt thus on "Dombey and Son," because, in the first place, it

gained for the Chambers Street Theatre an enduring public regard, and

was no doubt the incentive to the after-production of dramatizations of

Dickens, which gave us Burton in _Micawber_, _Squeers_, _Mr. Bumble_,

and _Sam Weller_; and because in so celebrating it we pay a deserved

tribute to Brougham, from whose fertile brain and ready pen it came. We

may say, in this connection, that not only as actor, but as playwright

also, Brougham achieved fame and honor. Many of his comedies are well

known to the stage, and are included in the published drama; and as a

writer of burlesque we question whether any thing better or funnier than

his "Po-ca-hon-tas or the Gentle Savage" has ever been composed. Of one

thing we are certain: an incarnate pun-fiend presided over its creation.

This extravaganza, first acted at Wallack's Lyceum, took the town by

storm, and its bons-mots, local hits, and trenchant witticisms, were on

the lips of everybody. In structure, idea, and treatment of theme, it

was ludicrous to a degree. Who does not remember Brougham and the late

Charles Walcot in their respective parts of _Powhattan_ and _Captain

Smith_?

It goes without saying that Brougham's Hibernian delineations were

perfect and to the manner born. Many an Irish farce we recall, during

his stay at Burton's, to which he gave a new lease of life; and we

congratulate ourselves that our memory holds record of having once seen

him as _Sir Lucius O'Trigger_, the only cast in our experience wherein

Sheridan's creation found a fitting representative.

We now pause before an actor of illustrious lineage; of a name honored

in dramatic annals by encomiums bestowed only upon abilities of the

highest order; an actor who, conscious of his inheritance of genius,

worthily perpetuates the traditions of his house; and who is now,

despite the flight of time, the most engaging and accomplished comedian

known to the American stage. Our readers will need no further

introduction to Lester Wallack, the "Mr. Lester" of Burton's, where

first we saw him so many years ago. We recall the evening when we sat in

the cosy parquette, awaiting with eager interest the rising of the

curtain on Charles Dance's comic drama of "Delicate Ground," in which

Mr. Lester would make his "first appearance since his return from

England" (so the bill ran), in the character of _Citizen Sangfroid_. We

say eager interest, for we had heard much of Mr. Lester: that he was

graceful, handsome, _distingué_,--in fact, splendid generally; and our

expectancy was akin to that of the watching astronomer--

"When a new planet swims into his ken."

At last the tinkle of the bell; the curtain rose, and enter Miss Mary

Taylor, the universal favorite, as _Pauline_. Her soliloquy closes with

the cue for _Sangfroid's_ entrance, and at the words, "Hush! my

husband!" a pause succeeded--and then from "door left" was protruded an

elegantly booted foot, and a moment later Lester stood before us, bowing

with characteristic ease and grace to the demonstrations of welcome. We

confess to an unconditional surrender on that occasion. The actual fact

was far beyond any expectation or hope. We thought we had never seen any

one quite so splendid; and _Sangfroid_ was forthwith invested with the

best and noblest elements that combine to elevate mankind. We endeavored

for many days afterward to conform our daily life to the general

teachings of _Sangfroid_; we imitated the gait and manner, the calm

aplomb of _Sangfroid_; the accent of _Sangfroid_ was impressed on all

our ordinary forms of speech; our conversation on whatever topic was

plentifully sprinkled with _Sangfroidisms_; in short, the whole tenor

of our existence was shaped and directed by _Sangfroid_ in the person of

Mr. Lester. We recovered in due course from our abject submission to the

spell of _Sangfroid_; but Lester continued to stretch forth the "sceptre

of fascination," and to his matchless grace and finish we owe many a

delightful recollection.

Then in early manhood,[9] the unrestrained alertness and vivacity of

youth were his in bounteous measure. He was in the _Percy Ardent_ and

_Young Rapid_ period, and had not yet entered the corridor of years at

the far end of which lurked the _blasé_ figure of "My Awful Dad." We

remember him in so many parts which in all likelihood he never will play

again! There was _Rover_, in "Wild Oats," that buskined hero, with his

captivating nonchalance dashed with tragic fire; his tender conversion

of _Lady Amaranth_--played, be it said, with all proper demureness by

Miss Lizzie Weston; his triumph over _Ephraim Smooth_--one of Blake's

instances of versatility--in a scene rich with the spirit of frolic

abandon; and his humorous tilt with _Sir George Thunder_--a belligerent

sea-dog, played by Burton as he alone could play it--an episode replete

with comic power;--all these contributed to a performance which we

revelled in many and many a night; and the memory of it, now as we

write, draws near in a succession of vivid pictures. There was

_Tangent_, in "The Way to Get Married," a capital part in Lester's

hands, blending manly action and debonair grace with that easy

transition to airy farcical expression, a favorite and effective

dramatic habit of this actor, and given full play in that memorable

prison scene in the comedy, when, a victim to adverse circumstances, and

actually fettered, he makes felicitous use of his handkerchief to hide

his mortification and his chains from the eyes of the heroine during her

visit of sympathy. _Percy Ardent_, in "The West End," was another of

his characteristic assumptions in those days; so also were _Young

Rapid_, in "A Cure for the Heartache," and the _Hon. Tom Shuffleton_, in

"John Bull"; and, indeed, Burton's frequent revivals of the old comedies

would have been a difficult matter without Lester; for in every one of

them a light comedy part is distinctly drawn, and unquestionably the

rarest among all dramatic artists is the first-class light comedian.

[9] Lester Wallack's first appearance in New York was made at the

Broadway Theatre, Sept. 27, 1847, as _Sir Charles Coldstream_ in "Used

Up."

Let any one who thinks otherwise endeavor to recall the names of those

who have been or are famous in that special line, and he will be

surprised to find how few he can enumerate. One might suppose that all

young actors would naturally incline toward light comedy, and be

ambitious in that direction, since in that sphere are found the charm of

youth, the expression of lofty sentiment, the impulse to chivalrous

action, the opportunity for the display of graceful and manly

bearing,--not to mention the lover, whom, as Emerson declares, all the

world loves; and why then, one may ask, should there not be always a

plentiful crop of ripening light comedians? Alas, it is not enough to be

young, good-looking, intelligent, and of virtuous impulse, or even a

lover. Something more is needed, and we conceive it to be that gift of

nature, which study and practice develop into seeming perfect art, but

which neither study nor practice can create; the gift, let us say, of

perceiving instinctively the salient points of a character, and going

beyond the author in felicitous and suggestive expression of them. It is

easier, we think, to compass tragedy; easier to simulate age; easier to

be funny; than to be at once airy and gay, delicately humorous, and

engagingly manly. There are fewer light comedians born,--that is the

whole story; and where we find one actor like Lester Wallack, we meet

with plenty of every other specialty. This was made strikingly evident

by Burton's experiments in supplying Lester's place, when the latter

joined his father in the establishment of Wallack's Lyceum. Charles

Fisher was imported, and he for a season essayed to succeed Lester; but

"The expectancy and rose of the fair state"

he was not, and it was not long before the fiddle of _Triplet_ and the

yellow stockings of _Malvolio_ emancipated him from the bondage of light

comedy, revealed his true powers, and made us grateful to Burton for

introducing to New York one of the best eccentric comedians of the day.

Dyott, Norton, and even Holman, were severally thrown into the breach,

such was the strait in which the manager found himself; and it was not

until he secured George Jordan that equilibrium was restored to the

company.

But to return. The versatility of Lester, so conspicuous throughout his

career, was early made apparent. We remember him as _Steerforth_, as

_Sir Andrew Aguecheek_, and _Captain Murphy Maguire_; and though in the

last he acted under the shadow of Brougham's rich impersonation, still

he was a delightful _Captain_. We saw him as the young lover, in "Paul

Pry"; as _Frederick_, in "The Poor Gentleman," and many more; besides

those parts, such as _Young Marlow_, _Charles Surface_, and _Captain

Absolute_, which need no reference, since they remain ripe and finished

conceptions in his present repertory. But of all his delineations of the

past, that which we linger on with the greatest pleasure, and which

affected us most, was his _Harry Dornton_, in "The Road to Ruin." From

the moment he appears beneath his father's window, importunate for

admittance, he awakens an interest and sympathy that follow him to the

end. The part abounds in touches of Lesterian hue and flavor: the scene

just mentioned; that wherein _Milford_ makes careless and heartless

allusion to _Old Dornton_, and is met by _Harry's_ eloquent and electric

rebuke; the scene with the _Widow Warren_, and with _Sophia_;--all are

charming; and we feel it to be no small tribute to hold in memory

Lester's _Harry_ side by side with the _Old Dornton_ of Blake.

William E. Burton: Actor, Author, and Manager A Sketch of his Career with Recollections of his Performances · 第 2 / 9 段