The salt remaining in the retort weighed 92.87 parts; nearly this

weight of water being added and heated, the whole was dissolved,

and on cooling, a salt, consisting of extremely minute filaments

resembling asbestos, was obtained, which, by capillary attraction,

retained a part of the residual solution so powerfully, that it was

necessary to absorb it by filtering paper.

Although it appeared improbable that the crystals could be a variety

of the known form of bisulphate of potash, yet supposing it might

be that salt with either less, or more than two atoms of water, Mr.

Phillips proceeded to its analysis. Some of the salt was readily

dried by exposure to the air of a warm room: 100 grains, by muriate

of baryta gave 154.75 grains of sulphate of baryta, equivalent

to 52.45 sulphuric acid: 109 grains heated to redness, lost 21.6

sulphuric acid and water, and left 78.4 grains of neutral sulphate

of potash. The latter contain 35.6 grains of sulphuric acid, which,

subtracted from the whole quantity of 52.45, indicates 16.85 as the

quantity dissipated by heat; and this again, subtracted from the

21.6, indicates 4.75 water in the crystals. The quantity of acid

separated by heat is, therefore, very nearly half that remaining

in the neutral sulphate, and the salt in question appears to be a

sesquisulphate of potash, consisting of

theory. experiment.

3 atoms sulphuric acid 120 55.33 52.45

2 " potash 96 42.66 42.80

1 atom water 9 4.00 4.75

--- ----- ------

225 99.99 100.00

Mr. Phillips found it difficult to prepare the sesquisulphate free

[p468] from bisulphate; and on repeating the attempt to procure it

exactly as before, obtained a large quantity of bisulphate, and a

small quantity of the peculiar salt; although the quantity of water

present is known to have an important influence on the nature of

the sulphates produced, yet the precise circumstances on which the

formation of sesquisulphate depends, are at present unknown.—_Phil.

Mag. N. S._, ii. 429.

10. _On certain Properties of Sulphur_.—The effect of heat upon

sulphur in first fusing it, but afterwards causing diminution of

fluidity in a certain degree proportionate to the temperature, has

been long and generally known, as well also as the peculiar soft

state into which the sulphur may be brought, by pouring it, when hot

and thickened, into cold water. M. Dumas has been led to examine

these phenomena for the purpose of acquiring a precise and particular

knowledge of the effects and changes.

Fused sulphur began to crystallize between 226° and 228°. Its fusing

point may be considered as 226°.4. Between 230° and 284° it is as

liquid as a clear varnish, and of the colour of amber; at about 320°

it begins to thicken, and acquire a red colour; on increasing the

heat, it becomes so thick, that it will not pour. This effect is most

marked between 428° and 572°; the colour being then a red-brown. From

572° to the boiling point it becomes thinner, but never so fluid as

at 248°. The deep red-brown colour continues until it boils.

When the most fluid sulphur is suddenly cooled, it becomes brittle,

but the thickened sulphur, similarly treated, remains soft, and more

soft as the temperature has been higher. Thus, at 230°, the sulphur

was very liquid, and yellow; and cooled suddenly by immersion in

water, it became yellow and very friable; at 374° it was thick,

and of an orange colour, but by cooling, became at first soft and

transparent, but soon friable, and of the ordinary appearance; at

428°, it was red and viscid, and when cooled, soft, transparent,

and of an amber colour; at the boiling point it was deep brown red

colour, and when cooled very soft, transparent, and of a red-brown

colour.

It is not necessary, as is sometimes stated, to heat the sulphur a

long time to produce this effect; all depends upon temperature. The

only precaution necessary is, to have abundance of water, and to

divide the sulphur into small drops or portions, that the cooling may

be rapid. If it be poured in a mass, the interior cools slowly, and

acquires the ordinary hard state. When the experiment is well made at

446°, the sulphur may be drawn into threads as fine as a hair, and

many feet in length.

M. Dumas, in remarking upon this curious effect of sudden cooling,

classes it with the similar effect which occurs with bronze. Although

difficult to assign the exact cause, yet he notices that the tendency

to crystallize can evidently be traced as influential over some of

the appearances, the hardness and opacity, for instance, [p469]

which always occur together when the crystalline state is assumed;

whereas, when rapid cooling has hindered crystallization, the mass

remains soft and transparent, until it crystallizes, which usually

happens in twenty or thirty hours.—_Ann. de Chimie_, xxxvi. 83.

11. _On the Fluidity of Sulphur and Phosphorus at common

temperatures_, by Mr. Faraday.—I published some time ago a short

account of an instance of the existence of fluid sulphur at common

temperatures[130]; and though I thought the fact curious, I did not

esteem it of such importance as to put more than my initials to

the account. I have just learned, through the _Bulletin Universel_

for September, p. 178[131], that Signor Bellani had observed the

same fact in 1813, and published it in the _Giornale di Fisica_,

vol. vi. (old series). I also learn, by the same means, that M.

Bellani complains of the manner in which facts and theories, which

have been published by him, are afterwards given by others as new

discoveries; and though I find myself classed with Gay-Lussac, Sir

H. Davy, Daniell, Bostock, &c., in having thus erred, I shall not

rest satisfied, without making restitution, for M. Bellani, in this

instance, certainly deserves it at my hand.

Not being able to obtain access to the original journal, I shall

quote M. Bellani’s very curious experiments from the Bulletin, in

which they appear to be fully described. “The property which water

possesses, of retaining its fluid states, when in tranquillity, at

temperatures 10° or 15° below its freezing point, is well known;

phosphorus behaves in the same manner; sometimes its fluidity may

be retained at 13° (centigrade?) for a minute, an hour, or even

many days. What is singular is, that, though water cooled below

its freezing point, congeals easily upon slight internal movement,

however communicated, phosphorus, on the contrary, sometimes retains

its liquid state even at 3°, even though it be shaken in a tube or

poured upon cold water. But, as soon as it has acquired the lowest

temperature which it can bear without solidifying, the moment it

is touched with a body at the same temperature, it solidifies so

quickly, that the touching body cannot penetrate its mass. If the

smallest morsel of phosphorus is put into contact with a liquified

portion, the latter infallibly solidifies, though it be only a single

degree below the limit of temperature necessary; this does not always

happen when the body touching it is heterogeneous.

“Sulphur presented the same phenomena as phosphorus; fragments of

sulphur always produced the crystallization of cold fluid portions.

Having withdrawn the bulb of a thermometer which had been plunged

into sulphur at 120°, it came out covered with small globules of

sulphur, which remained fluid at 60°; and having touched these one

after another with a thread of glass, they became solid: although

several seemed in contact, yet it required that each [p470] should

be touched separately. A drop of sulphur, which was made to move

on the bulb of the thermometer, by turning the instrument in a

horizontal position, did not congeal until nearly at 30°; and some

drops were retained fluid at 15°, _i. e._ 75° of Reaumur below the

ordinary point of liquefaction.”

The _Bulletin Universel_ then proceeds to describe some late and new

experiments of M. Bellani, on the expansion in volume of a cold dense

solution of sulphate of soda during the solidification of part of the

salt in it. The general fact has, however, been long and well known

in this country and in France; and the particular form of experiment

described is with us a common lecture illustration. The expansion, as

ascertained by M. Bellani, is 2/87 of the original volume of fluid.

According to the Bulletin, M. Bellani also claims, though certainly

in a much less decided manner than the above, the principal ideas

in a paper which I have published on the existence of a limit to

vaporization, and I referred back to the _Giornale di Fisica_ for

1822, (published prior to my paper,) for the purpose of rendering

justice in this case also. Here, however, the contact of our ideas

is so slight, and for so brief a time, that I shall leave the papers

in the hands of the public without further remarks. It is rather

curious to observe how our thoughts had been at the same time upon

the same subject. Being charged in the Bulletin with quoting an

experiment from a particular page in M. Bellani’s memoir, (which

I did from another journal, in which the experiment only was

described,) I turned to the original place, and there, though I found

the experiment I had transferred, I also found another which I had

previously made on the same subject, and which M. Bellani had quoted.

I very fully join in the regret which the _Bulletin Universel_

expresses, that scientific men do not know more perfectly what has

been done, or what their companions are doing; but I am afraid the

misfortune is inevitable. It is certainly impossible for any person

who wishes to devote a portion of his time to chemical experiment, to

read all the books and papers that are published in connexion with

his pursuit; their number is immense, and the labour of winnowing out

the few experimental and theoretical truths which in many of them

are embarrassed by a very large proportion of uninteresting matter,

of imagination, and of error, is such, that most persons who try the

experiment are quickly induced to make a selection in their reading,

and thus inadvertently, at times, pass by what is really good.

FOOTNOTES:

[130] Quarterly Journal of Science, xxi. 392.

[131] The Italian Journal has not yet arrived in this country.

12. _Separation of Selenium from Sulphur_.—Berzelius says, that

these substances, so much resembling each other in their general

properties, may be easily separated by the following process. When

sulphuret of selenium is fused with carbonate of potash, the alkali

not being excess, the fused mass, dissolved in water, leaves selenium

undissolved and free from sulphur. [p471]

Some of the sulphuret of selenium from Lukawitz, in Bohemia, was

dissolved in potash, and the solution converted into hyposulphite

by exposure to the air at the temperature of 65° F.; 0.1125 of the

sulphuret experimented with were precipitated, and found to be _pure

selenium_. The solution being of a deeper red colour than that of the

common sulphuret, a piece of sulphur was put into it, and the whole

boiled for a moment; a quarter of a grain of selenium, perfectly free

from sulphur, was precipitated.

A solution of a neutral seleniate, or of one with excess of base,

is soon rendered turbid by having sulphuretted hydrogen passed

through it. At first pure selenium separates; afterwards sulphuret

of selenium; and, lastly, mere sulphur. The solution should be

considerably diluted; when concentrated, the precipitate formed

is of a flame yellow colour, but soon becomes brownish-black, and

sulphur is deposited, sometimes crystallizing at the surface of the

deposite.—_Phil. Mag., N. S._, ii. 390.

13. _On a new Compound of Selenium and Oxygen—Selenic Acid, by_

MM. Mitscherlich and Nitzsch.—This acid contains half as much more

oxygen as that discovered by M. Berzelius, and with potash forms a

neutral salt, having the same form and optical properties as sulphate

of potash, containing no water when crystallized, and producing

insoluble precipitates with barytic salts. The acid is isomorphous

with the sulphuric, and may with propriety be called _selenic acid_,

that described by M. Berzelius being considered as the _selenious

acid_.

The new acid is easily prepared: for this purpose selenium, selenious

acid, a selenite or a metallic selenuret is to be fused with nitre.

Selenuret of lead, being the most abundant source, has been used for

this purpose, but being accompanied by sulphuret, the selenic acid

is usually contaminated by sulphuric acid. The selenuret of lead

is to be freed from carbonates by muriatic acid, and the residue

mixed with its weight of nitrate of soda, and thrown gradually into

a red-hot crucible. Water then dissolves out seleniate nitrate and

nitrite of soda, no selenium remaining in the residue. The solution

quickly boiled, deposits anhydrous seleniate of soda, and this being

separated, by cooling crystals of nitrate of soda are formed; these

being removed, ebullition again causes more seleniate to fall down,

and proceeding in this way an imperfect separation is effected. The

seleniate, like the sulphate of soda, is most soluble in water at

181°. To purify the salt completely, the nitrite should be changed

into nitrate by nitric acid; but then sulphate of soda would remain

as an impurity formed from sulphuret in the ore, and no attempt to

separate this has as yet succeeded.

But if the seleniate of soda be mixed with muriate of ammonia and

heated, selenium, nitrogen and water come over, no trace of sulphur

appearing. The selenium may, however, be dissolved in excess of

nitric acid, and the selenious acid produced tested by [p472]

muriate of baryta, which would then separate sulphuric acid if

present; the clear solution is to be saturated with carbonate of

soda, evaporated to dryness, and the mixture of selenite and nitrate

of soda obtained, fuzed in a porcelain crucible over a spirit-lamp.

Then proceed by crystallization as before, and a pure seleniate of

soda will be produced.

To separate the selenic acid, the solution is to be decomposed

by nitrate of lead; the seleniate of lead is as insoluble as the

sulphate, and being well washed, is to be decomposed by a current

of sulphuretted hydrogen, which has no action on the selenic acid;

the solution being filtered, is to be boiled, and is then diluted

selenic acid. Its purity, as respects fixed bodies, is ascertained

by its entire volatility; if sulphuric acid be present, it may be

ascertained by boiling a portion with muriatic acid, which produces

selenious acid, and then testing by muriate of baryta, a precipitate

indicates sulphuric acid.

From the isomorphism of selenic acid and its salts with sulphuric

acid and its salts, M. Mitscherlich concluded, that the oxygen in the

acid should be to that in selenious acid as 3 to 2; and to that in

bases when it forms salt, as 3 to 1. These views were confirmed by

experiments. From the decomposition of seleniate of potash by muriate

of baryta, it appeared that the seleniate was composed of

Potash 42.16 oxygen 7.15

Selenic acid 57.84 ---- 21.79

------

100.00

The composition of the acid was determined by boiling a certain

weight of the seleniate of soda with muriatic acid in excess, and

decomposing the selenious acid formed by sulphite of soda; 4.88 of

the salt gave 2.02 of selenium, from which, and the above result, it

would appear that the acid is formed of

Selenium 61.4

Oxygen 38.6

-----

100.0

According to Berzelius, selenious acid consists of 100 selenium, and

40.33 oxygen; and supposing this contains two-thirds the oxygen in

selenic acid, the latter should consist of 62.32 and 37.68. From the

analysis above given of the seleniate of potash, it is evident that

100 of selenic acid saturates a quantity of base captaining 12.56 of

oxygen, which would agree with the latter estimate of selenic acid.

_Selenic acid_ is a colourless liquid, which may be heated to 536°,

without sensible decomposition; above that it changes, and is,

rapidly resolved into oxygen and selenious acid at 554°. Heated to

329°, its specific gravity is 2.524; at 512°.6 it is 2.6; at 509°

it is 2.625; but by that time selenious acid has been formed in it.

A portion of concentrated acid, from which the selenious acid had

[p473] been removed, consisted of 84.21 selenic acid, and 15.75

water; but it is certain that the selenic acid begins to decompose

before it has resigned the last portions of water.

Selenic acid has a powerful attraction for water, and evolves much

heat when mixed with it. It is not decomposed by sulphuretted

hydrogen; so that the latter body may be used to decompose the

seleniates of lead and copper. When boiled with muriatic acid it

produces selenious acid and chlorine, and the mixture, like aqua

regia, will dissolve gold or platina. Selenic acid dissolves zinc

and iron, evolving hydrogen; it dissolves copper, evolving selenious

acid; and it dissolves gold, but not platina. Sulphurous acid has no

action on selenic acid, but instantly decomposes the selenious acid.

A solution containing selenic acid is easily decomposed, by first

boiling it with muriatic acid, and then adding sulphurous acid.

Selenic acid is but little inferior to sulphuric acid in its affinity

for bases; seleniate of baryta is not completely decomposed by

sulphuric acid. Its combinations being isomorphous with those of

sulphuric acid, and possessing the same crystalline forms, and the

same general chemical properties, present but very slight, though

very interesting differences from the sulphates. These will be

resumed by M. Mitscherlich in a future memoir, with the express

object of illustrating the theory of Isomorphism.—_Ann. de Chimie_,

xxxvi. 100.

14. _Preparation of Hyposulphuric Acid_.—According to M. Heeren, to

obtain the greatest quantity of this acid in the process of passing

sulphurous acid over black oxide of manganese, the temperature

should be low, and the oxide finely divided. The largest portion of

hyposulphuric acid is formed at the commencement of the operation.

15. _Singular Habitude of Phosphoric Acid with Albumen_.—MM.

Berzelius and Englehart differed in their results respecting the

effect of phosphoric acid on albumen; the latter found the acid

caused precipitation of the substance, the former the reverse.

Fortunately coming into company, they made some experiments, and

discovered a very singular property of the acid. The acid in

Berzelius’s laboratory not precipitating albumen, Dr. Englehart

prepared a fresh portion from phosphorus and nitric acid, evaporating

the solution in a platina vessel, and heating it to redness. This

acid, dissolved in water, precipitated both animal and vegetable

albumen abundantly. Another portion of acid, prepared by burning

phosphorus in air, also precipitated albumen. After many experiments

to discover the cause of difference in the acids, Dr. Englehart

remarked, that the two acids he had prepared, gradually lost their

power of precipitating albumen, and in some days were like the acid

of Berzelius. This change took place both in open and closed vessels,

and was not at all hastened by ebullition. [p474] Upon evaporating

the acid, and heating it to redness, it recovered its precipitating

power, but gradually lost it again by a day’s repose. The cause of

this difference escaped detection; it evidently does not depend upon

a difference of oxidation. “May it not be supposed,” says Berzelius,

“that there exists a chemical combination of phosphoric acid with

water, which is not formed until some time after solution, and which

is incapable of precipitating albumen?”—_Annales de Chimie_, xxxvi.

110.

16. _Economical Preparation of Deutoxide of Barium_.—This process is

due to M. Quesneville. Nitrate of baryta is to be put into a luted

earthenware retort, to which a tube is to be attached for the purpose

of conveying the liberated gases to a water-trough. The retort is

to be gradually heated to redness, and retained at that temperature

as long as nitrous acid and azotic gas pass over; the evolution of

these substances indicates that nitrate of baryta still remains to

be decomposed, but the instant that pure oxygen gas passes off, the

fire is to be removed and the retort cooled. The product of this

decomposition is a peroxide of barium; it falls to pieces in water,

without producing heat, disengages oxygen when boiled with water,

and is reduced to a protoxide by a strong heat. When acted upon by

sulphuric acid, no nitric acid was evolved; and when subjected to

nitric acid, no nitric oxide was produced. The production of this

peroxide is easily understood, for the protoxide formed by the

decomposition of the nitrate being in contact, at a red heat, with a

large quantity of oxygen in a nascent state, combines with it, and is

retained, unless the heat be so high as to decompose it.—_Annales de

Chimie_, xxxvi. 108.

The decomposition and effect are precisely the same as those lately

pointed out by Mr. Phillips as occurring with potassium when the

nitrate of potash is decomposed by heat.—See p. 483 of the last

volume of this Journal.

17. _Preparation of Aluminum—Chloride of Aluminum_.—According to

the accounts published, the following process has succeeded in

the hands of M. Oersted, in decomposing alumina and evolving the

base _aluminum_. Pure alumina is to be heated to redness, and then

well mixed with pulverized charcoal; the mixture is to be placed

in a porcelain tube, and being heated to redness, is to have dry

chlorine gas passed over it; the charcoal reduces the alumina, the

base combines with the chlorine, and oxide of carbon is formed.

The chloride of aluminum is soft, crystalline, and evaporates at

a temperature a little above 212° Fahrenheit: it readily attracts

moisture from the atmosphere, and becomes hot when water is added

to it. Being mixed with an amalgam of potassium, containing much

of the latter metal, and immediately heated, chloride of potassium

is formed, and the metallic base of the alumina combines with the

mercury. The amalgam quickly oxidises by exposure to air; but being

heated out of contact with the atmosphere, the mercury is [p475]

volatilized, and a metallic button is left, having the colour and

splendour of tin. A fuller account of the researches of M. Oersted on

this subject is expected.—Hensmann’s _Repertoire—Phil. Mag. N. S._ ii.

18. _Mutual Action of Lime and Litharge_.—M. Fournet heated a

mixture consisting of 7.12 parts of calcined lime, and 27.89 parts

of litharge, very strongly; a coherent mass was obtained, which,

pulverized and digested in water, gave, when filtered, a perfectly

clear and colourless liquor, which, when treated with sulphuretted

hydrogen, threw down an abundant black precipitate: hence oxide of

lead is rendered soluble in water by means of lime.—_Ann. des Mines_,

i. 538.

19. _New Chloride of Manganese discovered by_ M. J. Dumas.—This

chloride corresponds in proportions to the manganesic acid, and in

contact with water, produces muriatic and manganesic acids. It is

easily obtained by putting a solution of manganesic acid into contact

with concentrated sulphuric acid, and fused common salt. Water and

the new chloride are formed; the former is retained by the acid, the

latter volatilizes in a gaseous form. The body does not, however,

appear to constitute a permanent gas[132], for though, when produced,

it appears as an elastic fluid having a cupreous or greenish tint,

yet when passed into a tube, cooled to 5° or 4° Fahrenheit, it

condenses into a liquid of a brownish green colour.

When the perchloride is produced in a large tube, its vapour

gradually displaces the air present, and the tube becomes filled

with it; if it then be poured into a jar with moistened sides, the

colour of the gas changes as it comes into contact with the moist

air; a thick smoke of a fine rose colour appears; and the sides of

the vessel acquire a deep purple colour due to the manganesic acid

formed. The water thus coloured is abundantly precipitated by nitrate

of silver, and, acted upon by a solution of potash, produces all the

changes of the mineral chamelion.

The Quarterly Journal of Science, Literature and the Arts, July-December, 1827 · 第 46 / 51 段