To this construction of government and distribution of its powers, the

Commonwealth of Virginia does religiously and affectionately adhere,

opposing, with equal fidelity and firmness, the usurpation of either set

of functionaries on the rightful powers of the other.

But the federal branch has assumed in some cases, and claimed in others,

a right of enlarging its own powers by constructions, inferences, and

indefinite deductions from those directly given, which this Assembly

does declare to be usurpations of the powers retained to the independent

branches, mere interpolations into the compact, and direct infractions

of it.

They claim, for example, and have commenced the exercise of a right to

construct roads, open canals, and effect other internal improvements

within the territories and jurisdictions exclusively belonging to the

several States, which this Assembly does declare has not been given to

that branch by the constitutional compact, but remains to each State

among its domestic and unalienated powers, exercisable within itself and

by its domestic authorities alone.

This Assembly does further disavow, and declare to be most false and

unfounded, the doctrine, that the compact, in authorizing its federal

branch to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises to pay

the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the

United States, has given them thereby a power to do whatever they may

think, or pretend, would promote the general welfare, which construction

would make that, of itself, a complete government, without limitation

of powers; but that the plain sense and obvious meaning were, that they

might levy the taxes necessary to provide for the general welfare, by

the various acts of power therein specified and delegated to them, and

by no others.

Nor is it admitted, as has been said, that the people of these States,

by not investing their federal branch with all the means of bettering

their condition, have denied to themselves any which may effect that

purpose; since, in the distribution of these means, they have given to

that branch those which belong to its department, and to the States have

reserved separately the residue which belong to them separately: and

thus by the organization of the two branches taken together, have

completely secured the first object of human association, the full

improvement of their condition, and reserved to themselves all the

faculties of multiplying their own blessings.

Whilst the General Assembly thus declares the rights retained by the

States, rights which they have never yielded, and which this State

will never voluntarily yield, they do not mean to raise the banner of

disaffection, or of separation from their sister States, co-parties with

themselves to this compact. They know and value too highly the blessings

of their Union, as to foreign nations and questions arising among

themselves, to consider every infraction as to be met by actual

resistance. They respect too affectionately the opinions of those

possessing the same rights, under the same instrument, to make every

difference of construction a ground of immediate rupture. They would,

indeed, consider such a rupture as among the greatest calamities which

could befall them; but not the greatest. There is yet one greater,

submission to a government of unlimited powers. It is only when the

hope of avoiding this shall become absolutely desperate, that further

forbearance could not be indulged. Should a majority of the co-parties,

therefore, contrary to the expectation and hope of this Assembly,

prefer, at this time, acquiescence in these assumptions of power by the

federal member of the government, we will be patient and suffer much,

under the confidence that time, ere it be too late, will prove to them

also the bitter consequences in which that usurpation will involve us

all. In the mean while, we will breast with them, rather than separate

from them, every misfortune, save that only of living under a government

of unlimited powers. We owe every other sacrifice to ourselves, to our

federal brethren, and to the world at large, to pursue with temper and

perseverance the great experiment which shall prove that man is capable

of living in society, governing itself by laws self-imposed, and

securing to its members the enjoyment of life, liberty, property, and

peace; and further to show, that even when the government of its choice

shall manifest a tendency to degeneracy, we are not at once to despair

but that the will and the watchfulness of its sounder parts will reform

its aberrations, recall it to original and legitimate principles, and

restrain it within the rightful limits of self-government. And these are

the objects of this Declaration and Protest.

Supposing then, that it might be for the good of the whole, as some of

its co-States seem to think, that the power of making roads and canals

should be added to those directly given to the federal branch, as more

likely to be systematically and beneficially directed, than by the

independent action of the several States, this Commonwealth, from

respect to these opinions, and a desire of conciliation with its

co-States, will consent, in concurrence with them, to make this

addition, provided it be done regularly by an amendment of the compact,

in the way established by that instrument, and provided also, it be

sufficiently guarded against abuses, compromises, and corrupt practices,

not only of possible, but of probable occurrence.

And as a further pledge of the sincere and cordial attachment of this

Commonwealth to the union of the whole, so far as has been consented

to by the compact called ‘The Constitution of the United States of

America,’ (construed according to the plain and ordinary meaning of its

language, to the common intendment of the time, and of those who framed

it;) to give also to all parties and authorities, time for reflection

and for consideration, whether, under a temperate view of the possible

consequences, and especially of the constant obstructions which an

equivocal majority must ever expect to meet, they will still prefer the

assumption of this power rather than its acceptance from the free will

of their constituents; and to preserve peace in the mean while, we

proceed to make it the duty of our citizens, until the legislature shall

otherwise and ultimately decide, to acquiesce under those acts of

the federal branch of our government which we have declared to be

usurpations, and against which, in point of right, we do protest as null

and void, and never to be quoted as precedents of right.

We therefore do enact, and be it enacted by the General Assembly of

Virginia, that all citizens of this Commonwealth, and persons and

authorities within the same, shall pay full obedience at all times to

the acts which may be passed by the Congress of the United States, the

object of which shall be the construction of post-roads, making canals

of navigation, and maintaining the same, in any part of the United

States, in like manner as if the said acts were, _totidem verbis_,

passed by the legislature of this Commonwealth.

LETTER CLXXXVII.--TO WILLIAM B. GILES, December 25, 1825

TO WILLIAM B. GILES.

Monticello, December 25, 1825.

Dear Sir,

Your favor of the 15th was received four days ago. It found me engaged

in what I could not lay aside till this day.

Far advanced in my eighty-third year, worn down with infirmities which

have confined me almost entirely to the house for seven or eight

months past, it afflicts me much to receive appeals to my memory for

transactions so far back as that which is the subject of your letter.

My memory is indeed become almost a blank, of which no better proof can

probably be given you than by my solemn protestation, that I have not

the least recollection of your intervention between Mr. John Q. Adams

and myself, in what passed on the subject of the embargo. Not the

slightest trace of it remains in my mind. Yet I have no doubt of the

exactitude of the statement in your letter. And the less, as I recollect

the interview with Mr. Adams, to which the previous communications which

had passed between him and yourself were probably and naturally the

preliminary. That interview I remember well; not indeed in the very

words which passed between us, but in their substance, which was of a

character too awful, too deeply engraved in my mind, and influencing too

materially the course I had to pursue, ever to be forgotten. Mr. Adams

called on me pending the embargo, and while endeavors were making to

obtain its repeal. He made some apologies for the call, on the ground of

our not being then in the habit of confidential communications, but that

that which he had then to make, involved too seriously the interest of

our country not to overrule all other considerations with him, and make

it his duty to reveal it to myself particularly. I assured him there was

no occasion for any apology for his visit; that, on the contrary,

his communications would be thankfully received, and would add a

confirmation the more to my entire confidence in the rectitude

and patriotism of his conduct and principles. He spoke then of the

dissatisfaction of the eastern portion of our confederacy with the

restraints of the embargo then existing, and their restlessness

under it. That there was nothing which might not be attempted, to rid

themselves of it. That he had information of the most unquestionable

certainty, that certain citizens of the Eastern States (I think he

named Massachusetts particularly) were in negotiation with agents of the

British government, the object of which was an agreement that the New

England States should take no further part in the war then going on;

that, without formally declaring their separation from the Union of the

States, they should withdraw from all aid and obedience to them,

that their navigation and commerce should be free from restraint and

interruption by the British; that they should be considered and treated

by them as neutrals, and as such might conduct themselves towards both

parties; and, at the close of the war, be at liberty to rejoin the

confederacy. He assured me that there was imminent danger that the

convention would take place; that the temptations were such as might

debauch many from their fidelity to the Union; and that, to enable

its friends to make head against it, the repeal of the embargo was

absolutely necessary. I expressed a just sense of the merit of this

information, and of the importance of the disclosure to the safety

and even the salvation of our country: and however reluctant I was to

abandon the measure (a measure which persevered in a little longer, we

had subsequent and satisfactory assurance would have effected its object

completely), from that moment, and influenced by that information, I saw

the necessity of abandoning it, and instead of effecting our purpose by

this peaceful weapon, we must fight it out, or break the Union. I then

recommended to my friends to yield to the necessity of a repeal of the

embargo, and to endeavor to supply its place by the best substitute, in

which they could procure a general concurrence.

I cannot too often repeat, that this statement is not pretended to be

in the very words which passed; that it only gives faithfully the

impression remaining on my mind. The very words of a conversation are

too transient and fugitive to be so long retained in remembrance. But

the substance was too important to be forgotten, not only from the

revolution of measures it obliged me to adopt, but also from the

renewals of it in my memory on the frequent occasions I have had of

doing justice to Mr. Adams, by repeating this proof of his fidelity to

his country, and of his superiority over all ordinary considerations

when the safety of that was brought into question.

With this best exertion of a waning memory which I can command, accept

assurances of my constant and affectionate friendship and respect.

Th: Jefferson.

LETTER CLXXXVIII.--TO WILLIAM B. GILES, December 26, 1825

TO WILLIAM B. GILES.

Monticello, December 26, 1825.

Dear Sir,

I wrote you a letter yesterday, of which you will be free to make what

use you please. This will contain matters not intended for the public

eye. I see, as you do, and with the deepest affliction, the rapid

strides with which the federal branch of our government is advancing

towards the usurpation of all the rights reserved to the States, and the

consolidation in itself of all powers, foreign and domestic; and that

too, by constructions which, if legitimate, leave no limits to their

power. Take together the decisions of the federal court, the doctrines

of the President, and the misconstructions of the constitutional compact

acted on by the legislature of the federal branch, and it is but too

evident, that the three ruling branches of that department are in

combination to strip their colleagues, the State authorities, of the

powers reserved by them, and to exercise themselves all functions,

foreign and domestic. Under the power to regulate commerce, they assume

indefinitely that also over agriculture and manufactures, and call it

regulation to take the earnings of one of these branches of industry,

and that too the most depressed, and put them into the pockets of the

other, the most flourishing of all. Under the authority to establish

post-roads, they claim that of cutting down mountains for the

construction of roads, of digging canals, and aided by a little

sophistry on the words ‘general welfare,’ a right to do, not only the

acts to effect that, which are specifically enumerated and permitted,

but whatsoever they shall think or pretend will be for the general

welfare. And what is our resource for the preservation of the

constitution? Reason and argument? You might as well reason and argue

with the marble columns encircling them. The representatives chosen by

ourselves? They are joined in the combination, some from incorrect views

of government, some from corrupt ones, sufficient, voting together,

to outnumber the sound parts; and with majorities only of one, two, or

three, bold enough to go forward in defiance. Are we then to stand

to our arms, with the hot-headed Georgian? No. That must be the last

resource, not to be thought of until much longer and greater sufferings.

If every infraction of a compact of so many parties is to be resisted at

once, as a dissolution of it, none can ever be formed which would last

one year. We must have patience and longer endurance then with our

brethren while under delusion; give them time for reflection and

experience of consequences; keep ourselves in a situation to profit by

the chapter of accidents; and separate from our companions only when the

sole alternatives left, are the dissolution of our Union with them, or

submission to a government without limitation of powers. Between these

two evils, when we must make a choice, there can be no hesitation. But

in the mean while, the States should be watchful to note every material

usurpation on their rights; to denounce them as they occur in the most

peremptory terms; to protest against them as wrongs to which our present

submission shall be considered, not as acknowledgments or precedents

of right, but as a temporary yielding to the lesser evil, until their

accumulation shall overweigh that of separation. I would go still

further, and give to the federal member, by a regular amendment of the

constitution, a right to make roads and canals of intercommunication

between the States, providing sufficiently against corrupt practices in

Congress (log-rolling, &c.), by declaring that the federal proportion

of each State of the monies so employed, shall be in works within

the State, or elsewhere with its consent, and with a due _salvo_ of

jurisdiction. This is the course which I think safest and best as yet.

You ask my opinion of the propriety of giving publicity to what is

stated in your letter, as having passed between Mr. John Q. Adams and

yourself. Of this no one can judge but yourself. It is one of those

questions which belong to the forum of feeling. This alone can decide

on the degree of confidence implied in the disclosure; whether under no

circumstances it was to be communicated to others. It does not seem to

be of that character, or at all to wear that aspect. They are historical

facts, which belong to the present, as well as future times. I

doubt whether a single fact, known to the world, will carry as clear

conviction to it, of the correctness of our knowledge of the treasonable

views of the federal party of that day, as that disclosed by this, the

most nefarious and daring attempt to dissever the Union, of which the

Hartford Convention was a subsequent chapter: and both of these having

failed, consolidation becomes the first chapter of the next book of

their history. But this opens with a vast accession of strength from

their younger recruits, who, having nothing in them of the feelings or

principles of ‘76, now look to a single and splendid government of an

aristocracy, founded on banking institutions, and monied incorporations

under the guise and cloak of their favored branches of manufactures,

commerce, and navigation, riding and ruling over the plundered ploughman

and beggared yeomanry. This will be to them a next best blessing to the

monarchy of their first aim, and perhaps the surest stepping-stone to

it.

I learn with great satisfaction that your school is thriving well, and

that you have at its head a truly classical scholar. He is one of three

or four whom I can hear of in the State. We were obliged the last

year to receive shameful Latinists into the classical school of the

University; such as we will certainly refuse as soon as we can get from

better schools a sufficiency of those properly instructed to form a

class. We must get rid of this Connecticut Latin, of this barbarous

confusion of long and short syllables, which renders doubtful whether we

are listening to a reader of Cherokee, Shawnee, Iroquois, or what. Our

University has been most fortunate in the five Professors procured from

England. A finer selection could not have been made. Besides their

being of a grade of science which has left little superior behind, the

correctness of their moral character, their accommodating dispositions,

and zeal for the prosperity of the institution, leave us nothing more

to wish. I verily believe that as high a degree of, education can now be

obtained here, as in the country they left. And a finer set of youths I

never saw assembled for instruction. They committed some irregularities

at first, until they learned the lawful length of their tether; since

which it has never been transgressed in the smallest degree. A great

proportion of them are severely devoted to study, and I fear not to say,

that within twelve or fifteen years from this time, a majority of the

rulers of our State will have been educated here. They shall carry hence

the correct principles of our day, and you may count assuredly that they

will exhibit their country in a degree of sound respectability it has

never known, either in our days, or those of our forefathers. I cannot

live to see it. My joy must only be that of anticipation. But that you

may see it in full fruition, is the probable consequence of the twenty

years I am ahead of you in time, and is the sincere prayer of your

affectionate and constant friend,

Th: Jefferson.

LETTER CLXXXIX.--TO CLAIBORNE W. GOOCH, January 9, 1826

TO CLAIBORNE W. GOOCH.

Monticello, January 9, 1826.

Dear Sir,

I have duly received your favor of December the 31st, and fear, with

you, all the evils which the present lowering aspect of our political

horizon so ominously portends. That at some future day, which I hoped

to be very distant, the free principles of our government might change,

with the change of circumstances, was to be expected. But I certainly

did not expect that they would not over-live the generation which

established them. And what I still less expected was, that my favorite

western country was to be made the instrument of change. I had ever

and fondly cherished the interests of that country, relying on it as a

barrier against the degeneracy of public opinion from our original and

free principles. But the bait of local interests, artfully prepared

for their palate, has decoyed them from their kindred attachments,

to alliances alien to them. Yet, although I have little hope that the

torrent of consolidation can be withstood, I should not be for giving up

the ship without efforts to save her. She lived well through the first

squall, and may weather the present one. But, Dear Sir, I am not the

champion called for by our present dangers; _Non tali auxilio, nee

defensoribus istis, tempus eget_.’ A waning body, a waning mind,

and waning memory, with habitual ill health, warn me to withdraw and

relinquish the arena to younger and abler athletes. I am sensible

myself, if others are not, that this is my duty. If my distant friends

know it not, those around me can inform them that they should not, in

friendship, wish to call me into conflicts, exposing only the decays

which nature has inscribed among her unalterable laws, and injuring the

common cause by a senile and puny defence.

I will, however, say one word on the subject. The South Carolina

resolutions, Van Buren’s motion, and above all Bailey’s propositions,

show that other States are coming forward on the subject, and better for

any one to take the lead than Virginia, where opposition is considered

as common-place, and a mere matter of form and habit. We shall see what

our co-States propose, and before the close of the session we may shape

our own course more understandingly.

Accept the assurance of my great esteem and respect.

Th: Jefferson.

LETTER CXC.--TO [ANONYMOUS], January 21, 1826

Monticello, January 21, 1826.

Dear Sir,

Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies, From the Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 4 · 第 43 / 54 段