I subjoin an extract from a newspaper, which has lately appeared.*

*Extract from _The Courier de l'Egalite,_ November, 1792:

"There are discontented people who still venture to obtrude their

sentiments on the public. One of them, in a public print, thus

expresses himself--

'I assert, that the newspapers are sold and devoted to falsehood.

At this price they purchase the liberty of appearing; and the

exclusive privilege they enjoy, as well as the contradictory and

lying assertions they all contain, prove the truth of what I

advance. They are all preachers of liberty, yet never was liberty

so shamefully outraged--of respect for property, and property was at

no time so little held sacred--of personal security, yet when were

there committed so many massacres? and, at the very moment I am

writing, new ones are premeditated. They call vehemently for

submission, and obedience to the laws, but the laws had never less

influence; and while our compliance with such as we are even

ignorant of is exacted, it is accounted a crime to execute those in

force. Every municipality has its own arbitrary code--every

battalion, every private soldier, exercises a sovereignty, a most

absolute despotism; and yet the Gazettes do not cease to boast the

excellence of such a government. They have, one and all, attributed

the massacres of the tenth of August and the second of September,

and the days following each, to a popular fermentation. The

monsters! they have been careful not to tell us, that each of these

horrid scenes (at the prisons, at La Force, at the Abbaye, &c. &c.)

was presided by municipal officers in their scarfs, who pointed out

the victims, and gave the signal for the assassination. It was

(continue the Journals) the error of an irritated people--and yet

their magistrates were at the head of it: it was a momentary error;

yet this error of a moment continued during six whole days of the

coolest reflection--it was only at the close of the seventh that

Petion made his appearance, and affected to persuade the people to

desist. The assassins left off only from fatigue, and at this

moment they are preparing to begin again. The Journals do not tell

us that the chief of these _Scelerats_ [We have no term in the

English language that conveys an adequate meaning for this word--it

seems to express the extreme of human wickedness and atrocity.]

employed subordinate assassins, whom they caused to be clandestinely

murdered in their turn, as though they hoped to destroy the proof of

their crime, and escape the vengeance that awaits them. But the

people themselves were accomplices in the deed, for the Garde

Nationale gave their assistance,'" &c. &c.

In spite of the murder of so many journalists, and the destruction of the

printing-offices, it treats the September business so freely, that the

editor will doubtless soon be silenced. Admitting these accusations to

be unfounded, what ideas must the people have of their magistrates, when

they are credited? It is the prepossession of the hearer that gives

authenticity to fiction; and such atrocities would neither be imputed to,

nor believed of, men not already bad.--Yours, &c.

December, 1792.

Dear Brother,

All the public prints still continue strongly to insinuate, that England

is prepared for an insurrection, and Scotland already in actual

rebellion: but I know the character of our countrymen too well to be

persuaded that they have adopted new principles as easily as they would

adopt a new mode, or that the visionary anarchists of the French

government can have made many proselytes among an humane and rational

people. For many years we were content to let France remain the

arbitress of the lighter departments of taste: lately she has ceded this

province to us, and England has dictated with uncontested superiority.

This I cannot think very strange; for the eye in time becomes fatigued by

elaborate finery, and requires only the introduction of simple elegance

to be attracted by it. But if, while we export fashions to this country,

we should receive in exchange her republican systems, it would be a

strange revolution indeed; and I think, in such a commerce, we should be

far from finding the balance in our favour. I have, in fact, little

solicitude about these diurnal falsehoods, though I am not altogether

free from alarm as to their tendency. I cannot help suspecting it is to

influence the people to a belief that such dispositions exist in England

as preclude the danger of a war, in case it should be thought necessary

to sacrifice the King.

I am more confirmed in this opinion, from the recent discovery, with the

circumstances attending it, of a secret iron chest at the Tuilleries.

The man who had been employed to construct this recess, informs the

minister, Rolland; who, instead of communicating the matter to the

Convention, as it was very natural he should do on an occasion of so much

importance, and requiring it to be opened in the presence of proper

witnesses, goes privately himself, takes the papers found into his own

possession, and then makes an application for a committee to examine

them. Under these suspicious and mysterious appearances, we are told

that many letters, &c. are found, which inculpate the King; and perhaps

the fate of this unfortunate Monarch is to be decided by evidence not

admissible with justice in the case of the obscurest malefactor. Yet

Rolland is the hero of a party who call him, par excellence, the virtuous

Rolland! Perhaps you will think, with me, that this epithet is

misapplied to a man who has risen, from an obscure situation to that of

first Minister, without being possessed of talents of that brilliant or

prominent class which sometimes force themselves into notice, without the

aid of wealth or the support of patronage.

Rolland was inspector of manufactories in this place, and afterwards at

Lyons; and I do not go too far in advancing, that a man of very rigid

virtue could not, from such a station, have attained so suddenly the one

he now possesses. Virtue is of an unvarying and inflexible nature: it

disdains as much to be the flatterer of mobs, as the adulator of Princes:

yet how often must he, who rises so far above his equals, have stooped

below them? How often must he have sacrificed both his reason and his

principles? How often have yielded to the little, and opposed the great,

not from conviction, but interest? For in this the meanest of mankind

resemble the most exalted; he bestows not his confidence on him who

resists his will, nor subscribes to the advancement of one whom he does

not hope to influence.--I may almost venture to add, that more

dissimulation, meaner concessions, and more tortuous policy, are

requisite to become the idol of the people, than are practised to acquire

and preserve the favour of the most potent Monarch in Europe. The

French, however, do not argue in this manner, and Rolland is at present

very popular, and his popularity is said to be greatly supported by the

literary talents of his wife.

I know not if you rightly understand these party distinctions among a set

of men whom you must regard as united in the common cause of establishing

a republic in France, but you have sometimes had occasion to remark in

England, that many may amicably concur in the accomplishment of a work,

who differ extremely about the participation of its advantages; and this

is already the case with the Convention. Those who at present possess

all the power, and are infinitely the strongest, are wits, moralists, and

philosophers by profession, having Brissot, Rolland, Petion, Concorcet,

&c. at their head; their opponents are adventurers of a more desperate

cast, who make up by violence what they want in numbers, and are led by

Robespierre, Danton, Chabot, &c. &c. The only distinction of these

parties is, I believe, that the first are vain and systematical

hypocrites, who have originally corrupted the minds of the people by

visionary and insidious doctrines, and now maintain their superiority by

artifice and intrigue: their opponents, equally wicked, and more daring,

justify that turpitude which the others seek to disguise, and appear

almost as bad as they are. The credulous people are duped by both; while

the cunning of the one, and the vehemence of the other, alternately

prevail.--But something too much of politics, as my design is in general

rather to mark their effect on the people, than to enter on more

immediate discussions.

Having been at the Criminal Tribunal to-day, I now recollect that I have

never yet described to you the costume of the French Judges.--Perhaps

when I have before had occasion to speak of it, your imagination may have

glided to Westminster Hall, and depicted to you the scarlet robes and

voluminous wigs of its respectable magistrates: but if you would form an

idea of a magistrate here, you must bring your mind to the abstraction of

Crambo, and figure to yourself a Judge without either gown, wig, or any

of those venerable appendages. Nothing indeed can be more becoming or

gallant, than this judicial accoutrement--it is black, with a silk cloak

of the same colour, in the Spanish form, and a round hat, turned up

before, with a large plume of black feathers. This, when the magistrate

happens to be young, has a very theatrical and romantic appearance; but

when it is worn by a figure a little Esopian, or with a large bushy

perriwig, as I have sometimes seen it, the effect is still less awful;

and a stranger, on seeing such an apparition in the street, is tempted to

suppose it a period of jubilee, and that the inhabitants are in

masquerade.

It is now the custom for all people to address each other by the

appellation of Citizen; and whether you are a citizen or not--whether you

inhabit Paris, or are a native of Peru--still it is an indication of

aristocracy, either to exact, or to use, any other title. This is all

congruous with the system of the day: the abuses are real, the reform is

imaginary. The people are flattered with sounds, while they are losing

in essentials. And the permission to apply the appellation of Citizen to

its members, is but a poor compensation for the despotism of a department

or a municipality.

In vain are the people flattered with a chimerical equality--it cannot

exist in a civilized state, and if it could exist any where, it would not

be in France. The French are habituated to subordination--they naturally

look up to something superior--and when one class is degraded, it is only

to give place to another.

--The pride of the noblesse is succeeded by the pride of the merchant--

the influence of wealth is again realized by cheap purchases of the

national domains--the abandoned abbey becomes the delight of the opulent

trader, and replaces the demolished chateau of the feudal institution.

Full of the importance which the commercial interest is to acquire under

a republic, the wealthy man of business is easily reconciled to the

oppression of the superior classes, and enjoys, with great dignity, his

new elevation. The counting-house of a manufacturer of woollen cloth is

as inaccessible as the boudoir of a Marquis; while the flowered brocade

gown and well-powdered curls of the former offer a much more imposing

exterior than the chintz robe de chambre and dishevelled locks of the

more affable man of fashion.

I have read, in some French author, a maxim to this effect:--"Act with

your friends as though they should one day be your enemies;" and the

existing government seems amply to have profited by the admonition of

their country-man: for notwithstanding they affirm, that all France

supports, and all England admires them, this does not prevent their

exercising a most vigilant inquisition over the inhabitants of both

countries.--It is already sagaciously hinted, that Mr. Thomas Paine may

be a spy, and every householder who receives a lodger or visitor, and

every proprietor who lets a house, is obliged to register the names of

those he entertains, or who are his tenants, and to become responsible

for their conduct. This is done at the municipality, and all who thus

venture to change their residence, of whatever age, sex, or condition,

must present themselves, and submit to an examination. The power of the

municipalities is indeed very great; and as they are chiefly selected

from the lower class of shop-keepers, you may conclude that their

authority is not exercised with much politeness or moderation.

The timid or indolent inhabitant of London, whose head has been filled

with the Bastilles and police of the ancient government, and who would as

soon have ventured to Constantinople as to Paris, reads, in the debates

of the Convention, that France is now the freeest country in the world,

and that strangers from all corners of it flock to offer their adorations

in this new Temple of Liberty. Allured by these descriptions, he

resolves on the journey, willing, for once in his life, to enjoy a taste

of the blessing in sublimate, which he now learns has hitherto been

allowed him only in the gross element.--He experiences a thousand

impositions on landing with his baggage at Calais, but he submits to them

without murmuring, because his countrymen at Dover had, on his

embarkation, already kindly initiated him into this science of taxing the

inquisitive spirit of travellers. After inscribing his name, and

rewarding the custom-house officers for rummaging his portmanteau, he

determines to amuse himself with a walk about the town. The first

centinel he encounters stops him, because he has no cockade: he purchases

one at the next shop, (paying according to the exigency of the case,) and

is suffered to pass on. When he has settled his bill at the Auberge "a

l'Angloise," and emagines he has nothing to do but to pursue his journey,

he finds he has yet to procure himself a passport. He waits an hour and

an half for an officer, who at length appears, and with a rule in one

hand, and a pen in the other, begins to measure the height, and take an

inventory of the features of the astonished stranger. By the time this

ceremony is finished, the gates are shut, and he can proceed no farther,

till the morrow. He departs early, and is awakened twice on the road to

Boulogne to produce his passport: still, however, he keeps his temper,

concluding, that the new light has not yet made its way to the frontiers,

and that these troublesome precautions may be necessary near a port. He

continues his route, and, by degrees, becomes habituated to this regimen

of liberty; till, perhaps, on the second day, the validity of his

passport is disputed, the municipality who granted it have the reputation

of aristocracy, or the whole is informal, and he must be content to wait

while a messenger is dispatched to have it rectified, and the officers

establish the severity of their patriotism at the expence of the

stranger.

Our traveller, at length, permitted to depart, feels his patience

wonderfully diminished, execrates the regulations of the coast, and the

ignorance of small towns, and determines to stop a few days and observe

the progress of freedom at Ameins. Being a large commercial place, he

here expects to behold all the happy effects of the new constitution; he

congratulates himself on travelling at a period when he can procure

information, and discuss his political opinions, unannoyed by fears of

state prisons, and spies of the police. His landlord, however, acquaints

him, that his appearance at the Town House cannot be dispensed with--he

attends three or four different hours of appointment, and is each time

sent away, (after waiting half an hour with the valets de ville in the

antichamber,) and told that the municipal officers are engaged. As an

Englishman, he has little relish for these subordinate sovereigns, and

difficult audiences--he hints at the next coffee-house that he had

imagined a stranger might have rested two days in a free country, without

being measured, and questioned, and without detailing his history, as

though he were suspected of desertion; and ventures on some implied

comparison between the ancient "Monsieur le Commandant," and the modern

"Citoyen Maire."--To his utter astonishment he finds, that though there

are no longer emissaries of the police, there are Jacobin informers; his

discourse is reported to the municipality, his business in the town

becomes the subject of conjecture, he is concluded to be _"un homme sans

aveu,"_ [One that can't give a good account of himself.] and arrested as

"suspect;" and it is not without the interference of the people to whom

he may have been recommended at Paris, that he is released, and enabled

to continue his journey.

At Paris he lives in perpetual alarm. One night he is disturbed by a

visite domiciliaire, another by a riot--one day the people are in

insurrection for bread, and the next murdering each other at a public

festival; and our country-man, even after making every allowance for the

confusion of a recent change, thinks himself very fortunate if he reaches

England in safety, and will, for the rest of his life, be satisfied with

such a degree of liberty as is secured to him by the constitution of his

own country.

You see I have no design of tempting you to pay us a visit; and, to speak

the truth, I think those who are in England will show their wisdom by

remaining there. Nothing but the state of Mrs. D____'s health, and her

dread of the sea at this time of the year, detains us; for every day

subtracts from my courage, and adds to my apprehensions.

--Yours, &c.

A Residence in France During the Years 1792, 1793, 1794 and 1795, Part I. 1792 Described in a Series of Letters from an English Lady: with General and Incidental Remarks on the French Character and Manners · 第 8 / 8 题