CHAPTER XV

It was Friday morning, the 5th of June, 1915, and the young and popular

Prime Minister was busied in the Inaugural Ceremony of the Wardenship

of the Court of Dowry.

Repton or no Repton, the place must be filled. Demaine was back and

Demaine must be there on the front bench before there was an explosion.

The Inaugural Ceremony which introduces a Statesman to the Wardenship

of the Court of Dowry, technically called “L’Acceptance,” in strict

constitutional practice requires the presence of at least three

persons, the outgoing Warden (technically the Dischargee), the incoming

Warden (technically the Discoverer) and the Sovereign; but since

GHERKIN had, in spite of his eccentric Radicalism, raised the office

to its present position, the outgoing Warden could be represented by

proxy, though such a substitution was rarely made since it eliminated

the quaint custom of the “Braise”--one hundred pounds one hundred

shillings one hundred pence, and a new brass farthing specially minted

for the occasion, the whole in a silver-gilt case, and handed over to

the outgoer, to be regarded with historic respect and some one of its

coins to be kept as an heirloom.[5]

But Dolly, as he considered the situation on the Friday morning, Friday

the 5th of June, 1915, could see no way out of it; he must simply tell

Lady Repton briefly, and best by telephone, that she must not dream of

her husband’s appearing at Court, even with a keeper, and that it would

be necessary for the Repton household to forego the hundred sovereigns,

the hundred shillings, the hundred pence and the new brass farthing

specially minted for the occasion (the whole in a silver-gilt case),

rather than have a scandal.

It was Friday, and he was glad to remember it, a Private Members’ Day.

There were no questions. There was all Saturday and Sunday before

him. He would arrange for the Inauguration the very next week. He was

already advised that the officials had been permitted by the highest

authority, in view of Demaine’s recent privations when he was blown

out to sea in the little boat, treacherously abandoned by the foreign

vessel and rescued by the willing hands, etc., to omit the final

accolade with the ebony cudgel which had now for so many generations

formed the last and most picturesque feature of the ritual.

He took up his telephone and asked the next room to put him on to

the Reptons. He held the receiver while a servant told him that his

message should be immediately communicated, and then in a few seconds,

heard, to his great astonishment, not the tremulous tones of Maria, but

the masterly voice of Sir Charles, as incisive and direct as of old,

saying, “What is it?” in the tone of a man who must come at once to

business and has many things to do.

“Oh!” cried Dolly into the machine, quite taken aback. “That’s you,

Repton, is it?”

“Yes, of course,” came the answer shortly. “Well?”

“Oh nothing. Are you feeling better?”

“I don’t know what you mean.” This in restrained, quite unmistakable

tones. “My headache’s gone, if that’s what you mean.”

“Ye-es,” said the Prime Minister, wondering what on earth to say.

“Yes.... Oh it’s gone, has it?”

“Yes it has; I’ve told you that already.” Then after a pause, “Look

here, I’m really very busy. I’ve got three men here about that absurd

concession. You gave me a free hand, and I can’t wait. Hope I’m not

rude. It’s really very kind to ask after my health. You’ll be in the

House at twelve?” And the telephone suddenly rang off.

Dolly was in a stupor; he did what he always did, when things perplexed

him: he sent for Edward.

“Edward,” he said, “that cracked Dissenter has got three men in his

house and is talking about the oil concession to them! Oh lord!”

The Prime Minister was evidently frightened and troubled, but he did

not seem less frightened and more troubled than the occasion warranted.

He couldn’t make Repton out: there seemed to be another change.

Edward answered simply: “Why that makes three more who know,--that’s

all.”

“Do get a taxi,” said the Prime Minister, “and see what you can do.”

And he waited anxiously till Edward returned.

“Well?” said Dolly as he entered.

“Well!” said Edward. “He wasn’t very polite, but--but--are you quite

sure that you weren’t worried when you saw him on Tuesday?”

“Worried,” said Dolly, “I should think I was!”

“Well that’s what I mean,” said Edward a little uneasily. “Didn’t you

... didn’t you perhaps exaggerate a little?”

“_Exaggerate!_” said Dolly, jumping up with all his youthful vigour,

and looking for the moment less than forty-eight in his excitement,

“Why man alive, he was wearing a huge great Easter Lily in his

buttonhole, and he tried to wrestle with the butler in the hall!”

“Yes, but you know,” said Edward, “there’s gaiety in everybody, and it

comes out now and----”

“Oh gaiety be blasted!” interrupted Dolly. “The man was raving!”

“Well, they wouldn’t certify him anyhow,” said Edward, “and he’s

not raving _now_! He’s as sane as a waxen image, and as sharp as an

unexpected pin. I’m glad _I’m_ not doing business with him to-day.”

“Look here,” protested the Prime Minister. “If he wasn’t off, why

did he stay at home like a prisoner all Wednesday, with Lady Repton

preventing any one seeing him? And what was he doing all yesterday,

Thursday? Why didn’t he come down to the House, eh, if he wasn’t off?”

“I didn’t say he wasn’t ill,” said Edward blandly. “I only said there

might have been some exaggeration.”

“Oh very well,” ended the Prime Minister wearily, “oh very well!”

Edward came to a swift decision and telephoned first to the _Moon_ then

to the _Capon_ privately that “it was all right about Repton; there’d

been a mistake.” His chief went out on the duties of the day.

Yet _another_ change of plan! More bother! He would have to go through

with the peerage now! He went gloomily down to the House of Commons and

learned that Charles Repton was already in his place, stiff, groomed

and regular upon the Treasury bench.

Dolly came in nervously and shook hands with him.

Sir Charles took his hand rather coldly; he did not see why a couple

of days’ headache which no one had heard about should be made the

excuse for so much public affection. It emphasised the thing. And he

sat through the first hour of the debate looking as if he would have

been just as well pleased to be made less fuss about. “Anyhow,” he

thought to himself by way of consolation, “I shall be rid of it next

week,” and his mind turned in an equable fashion to his taking his seat

in the Upper House and to what his first business there might be.

As he was so thinking George Mulross Demaine came in quietly by one of

the side doors. As he entered there was a little subdued cheering from

those who remembered the announcement of his approaching appointment.

It flurried him a little. He sat down and tried to forget it, while the

debate maundered on.

In the Lobbies Repton continued to suffer somewhat from occasional

congratulations on his return to health. He did not easily understand

them, and he was a trifle gruff in his replies. He was going into the

library for a little peace when a messenger put a note into his hand;

it was from the Duke of Battersea.

“More fuss!” he thought, but he went immediately with his stiff,

upright gait to where that great Financier was waiting for him, and he

greeted him warmly enough.

The Duke, like the business man he was, was very brief and to the

point. He congratulated Charles Repton not (thank heaven!) on having

got rid of the slight headache which seemed to have filled the thoughts

of too many people, but upon the great accession the Upper House was

to receive, and then the Duke having said so much went on to what he

really had to say, his pronunciation marred only by that slight lisp

which ill-natured reports so constantly exaggerated. Sir Charles Repton

(he said) would remember the very disgraceful case of the editor of the

_Islington Hebdomadal Review_?

Charles Repton tried to remember, but could not.

Well, it wath the cathe of the man who had very properly got twenty

yearth of the betht for thaying that he could reveal how old

Ballymulrock had got his peerage ... a dithgratheful cathe! There wath

blackmail behind it!

Yes, Charles Repton could remember now, and he smiled a grim smile as

he considered the peculiar ineptitude of that particular convict. Why

old Ballymulrock was the seventh in the title, he had nothing a year,

he was a doddering old bachelor of eighty-seven, he had got it by a

fluke from a half-nephew, and it was only an Irish elective peerage at

that! The convict had pleaded a misprint! What a fool! Yes, Sir Charles

Repton could remember the case. What about it? “I’m not going to take

any action to save him,” he said sharply, “if that’s what you want: he

deserved all he got! If you want some one get Birdwhistlethorpe; Isaacs

that was: he knows North London.”

“Noh, noh, noh,” said the aged Duke of Battersea in alarm, “you

mithunderthand me!” And he went on to tell the outgoing Warden that

they were determined to bring this sort of thing before the House of

Lords in a Resolution. Would he move?

“I don’t see what I’ve got to do with it,” said Repton shortly.

The Duke smiled as he had smiled years ago, when he produced Lord

Benthorpe’s paper and brought that now forgotten personage to heel. Had

Sir Charles seen what the _Moon_ had been saying that very day?

No, Sir Charles hadn’t. He supposed it was about the oil concessions.

He paid no attention to the _Moon_. But Edward’s telephone to the

_Moon_ and the _Capon_ had borne dreadful fruit. Each editor had

thought to have regained his freedom.

The Duke of Battersea’s smile grew more portentous; he discovered a

cutting in the inner pocket of a coat which somehow or other always

looked greasy upon him, and as Sir Charles read it, his face darkened.

“It’s pretty scandalous,” he said as he laid it down. For the leader

in the _Moon_ gave it to be understood in no very roundabout way that

there had been a deal over Repton’s peerage.

“The _Capon’th_ worth, _far_ worth!” insinuated the Duke of Battersea.

“Is it?” said Sir Charles, “indeed!”

“Yeth, indeed yeth,” said the aged Duke, putting the paper forward as

though over a counter; and Sir Charles Repton could not forbear to

read it. It certainly _was_ worse; it simply said point blank that the

Burmah Oil Concession was the price of Repton’s promotion to the Upper

House. And the passage ended with these words:

“We have no desire to add to a domestic affliction which no friend

of the Government regrets more sincerely than we do ourselves, and

we are willing to believe that the unfortunate gentleman, who we

fear can never again take his old place in public life, was himself

quite innocent of any such dealing; but ambitions other than his own

may have been concerned in this matter, and the giving of permanent

legislative power to a man who now notoriously can no longer take

part in active public life, does but add to the scandal.”

That decided him! He would nip off that headache legend at once, and

sharply!

“Yes,” he said, “I’ll move as soon as you like, and the sooner the

better.” He did not say it as though he was granting a favour; and it

was easy to see that the Duke was a little afraid of him:--

After a pause during which the two men rose to part, the old gentleman

suggested that Methlinghamhurst should speak after him.

“Messlingham _who_?” said Repton, puzzled. The name was unfamiliar to

him.

“No, not Methlinghamhurtht! _Meth_linghamhurtht,” said the Duke of

Battersea, rather too loud. “_Meth_linghamhurtht!”

Sir Charles shook his head, still puzzled. “I daresay he’s all right,”

he said all starch.

“_You_ know,” said the Duke of Battersea, craning forward in a

confidential way, “Clutterbuck that wath.”

“Oh! Clutterbuck! Yes, I remember. Well? Can he speak?”

“Not very well,” hesitated the Duke of Battersea, “but you know he

wanted....”

“I really don’t care,” said Sir Charles moving away. “Anyhow I’ll do

it.”

The Duke was profuse in his thanks.

* * * * *

Charles Repton returned to the House of Commons. Another message!

“The Prime Minister begged to see Sir Charles Repton:” really there was

no end to the number of people wanting to see him that day! Charles

Repton went towards Dolly’s room with such muscles showing upon his

face as would have made any one afraid to say another word about

the headache,--but it was not of the headache, at least not of that

directly, that Dolly had to speak.

“Repton,” he said apologetically and in some dread, “I’m afraid I made

arrangements for a proxy next week--I mean for L’Acceptance you know.”

“Oh you did!” said Sir Charles, really nettled. “You might have asked

me first I think!”

“Well, you see,” began his unfortunate chief,--

“As a fact I don’t see,” said Repton drily, “but I suppose you’ve put

it right. I’ve written to say I should be there.”

“Oh yes, certainly, certainly,” said Dolly hurriedly, “I’ve changed

it.” As a fact he’d done nothing of the kind and was wondering what he

should say to the proxy. “Certainly!”

“All right,” said Charles Repton moving towards the door. “That’s all,

I suppose?”

“Yes, that’s all,” said Dolly, with perhaps a hundred more things to

say. “I’ll see that you get notice of the exact hour.”

“Of course,” said Charles Repton briefly, and he shut the door quietly

but firmly behind him.

* * * * *

The inaugural ceremony, though shorn for some years of the backward

entrance which was its most picturesque feature, and now (though not

as a precedent) of the accost with the ebony cudgel, was impressive

enough. The silver-gilt case with the Three Hundred and One specially

minted Coins had been put into Charles Repton’s Seisin by the Symbol

of the Flask of Palm Oil, and was already on its way to his house; the

tinkling shoes had been rapidly put on and off, and Demaine had sworn

fealty for sergeanty in Ponthieu and the Seniory of Lucq, and all the

embroglio was done.

Lord Repton (for he was content with that simple title--in the Manor

of Giggleswick) was present for the first time upon the red benches,

awaiting the moment for the debate upon the Resolution in which he was

to open and move.

In the House of Commons George Mulross Demaine, who for the last

few days had been coaching steadily in the duties of his post, and

especially in the really difficult technicalities of replying to

questions, was reading his notes for the last time in the comfortable

room assigned to his office, and repeating to himself in a low tone the

words he had so carefully committed to memory. Edward was with him to

give him courage; and he needed such companionship.

At last he was summoned.

The House was very full for question-time, for it was known or

suspected that something of importance would take place that day. The

full nature of the crisis had been understood by very few, but the

disappearance of Demaine and his return, his terrible adventures in the

fishing-boat, his night at sea, the dastardly action of the foreign

crew, and the heroic succour which had ultimately reached him were

public property.

The silent and little known young member whose disappearance from the

benches under the gallery would never have been noticed, was half a

hero already in the popular mind, and had become particularly dear to

his colleagues during the anxious moments when he was believed to be

lost, and when the press of London had worked that mystery for all it

was worth.

The House of Commons knows a _Man_.

There was, therefore, loud and hearty cheering, which, according to the

beautiful tradition of our public life, was confined to no one part of

the assembly, when, that happy Friday, George Mulross entered rapidly

from behind the Speaker’s chair, stumbled over the outstretched foot of

the Admiralty, his second uncle by marriage, and took his seat for the

first time among his new colleagues upon the Treasury Bench.

The Prime Minister accompanied him. Congratulations suitable to the

occasion were to be seen in the gestures of those in his immediate

neighbourhood, and he himself wore the blest but sickly smile of a man

who is about to be hanged but who is possessed of a fixed faith in a

happy eternity.

Only one question was set down to him; he had read it and re-read it;

he had read and re-read the typewritten answer which Mr. Sorrel had

furnished him and which he had now got by heart beyond, he hoped,

the possibility of error. The questioner had chivalrously offered

to withdraw his query in deference to the fatigues and anxieties

through which the new Warden of the Court of Dowry had so recently

passed, but the Prime Minister, though appreciative of that offer,

rather determined that his dear young relative should win his spurs;

and trivial as the subject was, Question No. 31 was by far the most

important upon the paper for most of those present.

It concerned (of course) the wreck which still banged about, the sport

of wind and wave, upon the Royal Sovereign Shoals. This aching tooth

of Empire had cropped up again in yet another aspect. The Member for

Harrowell, a landowner upon that coast, wanted to know whether it was

not a fact that large planks studded, he was ashamed to say, with long

rusty nails, had not drifted shorewards from the wreck and grievously

scratched such persons as were indulging in mixed bathing just off the

popular and rapidly rising seaside resort which lay a little east by

north of the wretched derelict.

Question No. 29 was answered, Question 30 was answered. Demaine’s

ordeal had come.

He heard a low mumbling noise some distance down the benches which he

would never have taken to be the single word “Thirty-one” had not his

mother’s half-sister’s husband the Chancellor of the Exchequer given

him a sharp dig in the ribs with his elbow and jolted him onto his

feet. His hands shook like a motor car at rest as he began his reply.

“I have nothing to tell my right honourable gentleman--I mean my

honourable gentleman....” Here there was a pause, painful to all

present with the exception of one ribald fellow who cackled twice and

then was silent.... “I have nothing to add,” George Mulross began again

with a lump in his throat, “in reply to my honourable friend--to

what my predecessor said in reply to a similar” (another pause) ...

“Oh,--_question_--upon the tenth of this month.”

He had read all of it out now, anyhow, and he sat down, a trifle

unsteadily, feeling for the seat.

“Arre we to onderrstand,” boomed the voice of the inevitable fanatic,

“that the carrgo of GIN is yet aboorrd...?”

“Hey! what?” said Demaine over his shoulder, with a startled air.

“Get up and ask for notice,” whispered a colleague very hurriedly. “Get

up and say ‘I must ask for notice of that question.’ Say ‘I must ask

for notice of that question.’ Get up quick.”

Demaine got up, took hold of the box, turned his back upon the

questioner and looking full at the harmless and startled Opposition

said, not without menace:

“I must ask for a notice of that question”--and sat down.

There were a few more sympathetic cheers and all was well. The Warden

of the Court of Dowry was launched upon his great career.

Meanwhile, beyond the Central Hall, Lord Repton of Giggleswick was

rising for the first time among his Peers.

That House also was full and was prepared to give the spare towering

figure and the stoical face a sympathetic hearing, for the recognition

of a man who had served his country so faithfully and so well and who

had recently suffered a temporary malady of so distressing a nature was

universal and sincere.

The House of Lords knows a _Man_.

Lord Repton, even as plain Sir Charles, had always been an admirable

parliamentary speaker: not only quick at debate but with a grave and

lucid delivery which, coupled with his intimate grasp of detail and the

sense of balanced judgment behind his tone, made his one of the most

effective voices in our public life.

It would be difficult to say by what art he contrived to give in that

large assembly the impression of speaking as quietly as though he were

in a private room, and yet so managed that every word of his--every

syllable,--was heard in every corner of the House.

In the Peeresses’ Gallery women in mauve, heliotrope, eau-de-nil,

crapaud mort, and magenta, made a brilliant scheme of colour.

The Lords, who upon occasions of privilege are by custom robed, gave to

the splendid place the deeper tone of red plush and white pelts with

small black tails which is otherwise reserved for such great occasions

of state as the Opening of Parliament, the Coronation, an Impeachment

or a Replevin at Large; at the bar a crowd of Commoners pressed, many

of whom recognised in the faces before them those of brothers, fathers,

first cousins, debtors, creditors and clients in business. It was

an animated and an impressive scene, and the audience, large as it

was, would doubtless have been larger but for an unfortunate blunder

by which the Eton and Harrow match and a particularly interesting

rehearsal of the Mizraim dance were both fixed for that very afternoon.

As it was, the two hundred or more Peers present were finely

representative of all that is best and worst in the national life.

The aged Duke of Battersea had made a point not only of coming but

of speaking upon such an occasion; the Bishops had turned up in full

force, and the Colonial Peers, now happily added to the ancient House,

were remarkable not only for their strict attention to this historic

business, but for their somewhat constrained attitudes: not one was

absent from his seat.

The report of a speech, however excellent, is but a dull reflection of

the original, as all may judge who consider the contrast between the

entrancing rhetoric which daily holds spellbound the House of Commons

and the plain prose appearing in the morning papers.

It would ill repay the reader for the courtesy and charm she has shown

throughout the perusal of these pages, were I to inflict upon her a

mere verbatim transcript of Lord Repton’s famous harangue. But the

gist of it well merits record here, not only because it did much to

kill a poisonous spirit which had till then been growing in English

journalism--but also because it was in itself a typical and splendid

monument of the things that build up the soul of a great man.

He began in the simplest manner with a review of what had determined

some of them to bring forward this Resolution. It needed no reiteration

upon his part, and indeed the matter was so painful that the mere

recalling of it must be made as brief as possible.

“It has been suggested that places in that House are acquired by

process of purchase.

“There, in plain English, is the accusation.”

He would remark in passing that the cowards and slanderers--he did

not hesitate to use strong language--(and even the sanctity of the

precincts could not check a murmur of approval), the cowards and

slanderers who brought forward that general accusation, dared not make

it particular.

“In one case,” he said, turning gravely to the place where he expected

to see but was disappointed not to see the very aged frame of Lord

Ballymulrock, “in one case which referred to a peer whose health I am

distressed to say has made it impossible for him to be present upon

this occasion” (a protest from an exceedingly old man who sat folded up

on high--it was Bally himself!), “in one case a direct accusation has

been made.... Melords, you know the issue. An appeal still lies, and it

is not for me to deal with a matter which is _sub judice_; but apart

from that case, these anonymous hacks who have for so long corrupted or

attempted to corrupt the public mind in respect to this House, confine

themselves to generalities upon which the law can take no hold.”

It was upon this very account that the general resolution of which

he had spoken had been framed, and he would pass at once from the

unsavoury recollection of such acts, to that part of his argument which

he thought would have most weight with his fellow-subjects.

“This House, including the more recent creations, the Colonial Peers,

and the ex-officio additions with which a recent--and in my opinion a

beneficent reform--has recruited it, still numbers less than fifteen

hundred men. Of these the ex-officio members, the lords spiritual”

(and he bowed to the Bishop of Shoreham, who was deaf) “the elected

members from the Britains Overseas (among whom I am glad to see present

the Nerbuddah Yah) between them account for no less than forty-two.

Two hundred and eighty” (he quoted from a paper in his hand) “are

imbeciles, minors or permanent invalids; somewhat over fifty are for

one reason or another incapacitated from attendance at their debates;

ten are in gaol.”

“Now, Melords,” he continued, “of the eleven hundred remaining--they

are roughly eleven hundred,--what do we find? We find”--emphatically

striking his right-hand fist into his left-hand palm,--“we find no

less than five hundred and twelve to be the sons of their fathers--or

in some other way direct heirs: ninety-eight to have succeeded to their

titles from collaterals of the first or of the second degree; sixteen

to have succeeded in some more distant manner; eleven to owe their

position to the revival of ancient tenures; the claims of six to have

been recently proved through the female line; and one by Warranty and

Novel Disseizin. What remains?”

He looked round the eager assembly before him with an attitude of the

head dignified but wonderfully impressive.

“Melords, I ask again, what remains? _Less than four hundred men_, the

representatives of all the chief energies of our national life. We

have here the great champions of industry, the great admirals of our

fleets, the great generals of our armies--and I am happy to include

the Salvation Army, (the head of that great organisation lifted his

biretta)--men who have distinguished themselves in every conceivable

path of public life, who have loyally served their country and many of

whom after such service are still honourably poor.”

At this phrase which was evidently the approach to his peroration, many

Peers who had hitherto been sitting with their knees apart, crossed one

leg over the other; some few who, on the contrary, had had their legs

crossed, uncrossed them and reposed both feet upon the floor; more than

one took the opportunity to recline his head upon his right hand, and

the most venerable member of the bench of Bishops coughed in a manner

that would have wrung a heart of stone.

When these slight interruptions were over, Lord Repton of Giggleswick

found it possible to proceed. He showed by a strict process of inquiry

how those to whom the abominable suggestion might conceivably apply,

could not by any stretch of the imagination amount to eighty in number.

“Less than eighty men, Melords, in an assembly of fifteen hundred!

Hardly five per cent.--hardly, if I may use a bold metaphor, thirteen

pence in the pound! It is by this proportion alone, even did these

detestable falsehoods contain--which they do not--a grain of truth,

that our whole body is forsooth to be judged! But, Melords, who are

these eighty men, if I do not insult them by permitting my argument to

approach their names?

“I will not cite my own case; my public career is open for any man to

examine, and I think I know the temper of my own people too well to

delay upon that score. But there are around me others perhaps (I know

not) more sensitive, or less experienced in the petty villainies of the

world, than am I, who may have thought themselves especially marked out.

“I ask, against which of them could such an accusation be levelled by

name, without the certitude of such a result in any Court of Justice as

would silence the mouth of the libeller for many years? Is it, Melords,

the man to whom we owe the great reservoir at Sing Yan? Is it that

world-famous Englishman who by his organising ability, his untiring

industry and his knowledge of men, has built up the United Sausage

Company’s emporiums throughout the length and breadth of the land?

“I might extend the list indefinitely: Melords, to no one of these, to

no one member of this House I venture to say, can words of this kind be

addressed without their falsity being apparent almost without need for

proof.

“I repeat in the words of Burke, ‘No, no, no, a thousand times no.’ I

am not ashamed to recall the glorious phrase with which these walls

echoed to the voice of Ephraim ten years ago: ‘Give me such principles

as these and I will trample them into the dust beneath my feet!’”

Having said so much, Lord Repton sat down, and it is a tribute to the

fire and the conviction of the man that a young heiress of African

Origin but recently married, who had been listening intently from the

Peeresses’ Gallery throughout the latter part of the speech, gave a low

moan and fainted clean away.

Her young form was borne down to the buttery by a strong posse of

attendants where the air from the Terrace soon revived her. I mention

the incident only as a signal proof of the oratorical powers that had

illumined Repton’s great career.

After such an effort Lord Methlinghamhurst necessarily somewhat palled,

especially as an imperfection in his diction, failing eyesight and a

certain loss of memory compelled him to make long and uncomfortable

pauses over the large printed slip which he held in his hand, but

it was over at last, and the Duke of Battersea rose amid the evident

interest of such as remained to hear him, no less than five of whom

were concerned with himself in the Anapootra Ruby Mines.

The great financier did well to interpose upon such an occasion. His

lisp, with which the House was now familiar, was the only impediment to

a sincere and vigorous piece of English. There was not a word which the

most exuberant would presume to add, nor one which the most fastidious

would dare to erase.

The proceedings had occupied something close upon three-quarters of

an hour, and the Senate, unused to such delays, was impatient to pass

to the vote, when, to the universal horror of that hall, Ballymulrock

tottered to his feet. There was almost a stampede. Luckily the Aged Man

was as brief as he was inaudible. It was a couple of squeaks, several

mutters, and a collapse. They proceeded to put the question.

The Peers flocked back again to their places in great numbers; others

stood ready for the Lobbies--but there was no need.

It was one of those rare moments when many hundreds of hearts, to quote

a wild and lovely poem, beat as one; and with a silent unanimity which

eye-witnesses declare to have formed the most impressive sight since

the first great review of Specials upon Salisbury Plain, the Resolution

was adopted.

Thus was destroyed, let us hope for ever, what was rapidly growing to

be a formidable legend and one that would have undermined the security

of the State and the honour of our public life in the eyes of rival

nations.

It was not the least of the services which Charles Repton had rendered

to the State, and as we raise our grateful hats to Providence for the

recovery that made his action possible, let us not forget the genius of

the Young Canadian Doctor who was the author of that miraculous moment

in a story of a thousand years.

* * * * *

The Private Members’ time was ended. The House sat on upon the

Broadening of the Streets Bill, the intense unpopularity of which

rendered it especially urgent.

When the House of Commons rose, near midnight, Dolly and Dimmy went

out together by the door of the private rooms into the cool air and

there in the courtyard were the glowing lamps of Mary’s motor car. She

beckoned them and they got in.

“You got to come to supper to-night,” she said mysteriously. “They’ll

all be there.”

Dimmy was agreeable. Dolly tried to plead something but she shut him

up, and after them in single file raced through London half a dozen

taxis and cars and broughams all making in a stream for St. James’s.

It made such a supper-party as Mary Smith alone in London could gather!

Her sister-in-law, with the Leader of the Opposition, and his

brother; his right-hand man who had been Chancellor in the last

administration; his nephew, the Postmaster General; Dolly himself;

Dolly’s brother-in-law, the Secretary for India; his little nephew’s

wife’s cousin at the Board of Trade, and his stepmother’s brother at

the Admiralty, sat down,--and so did Dimmy, who was there without his

wife, and also, I regret to say, without a stud, or rather without the

head of a stud, in his shirt; for somehow it had broken off.

But the reader will have but an imperfect picture of that jolly table

if she imagines that it was a mere family party.

Our public life is a larger thing than that! Of the five members of the

two front benches who were not connected by marriage, two were present:

the Minister for Education who could draw such screamingly funny things

on blotting-paper, and Beagle, back two days before from Berlin, who

could imitate a motor car with his mouth better than any man in Europe.

And there also, by a sort of licence, was the Duke of Battersea,

brought by Charlie Fitzgerald and his wife.

They had already sat down when William Bailey, whom no one had invited,

came ponderously and good-humouredly in, affected to stare at the Duke,

and made a place for himself as far as possible from that controller

of hemispheres, who was in his usual chair on Mary Smith’s right hand,

with bulbous baggy eyes for none but her.

William Bailey smiled all that evening and smiled especially at

Dimmy--but he remained very silent; when, a little before two, they

began to make a move, he had not said a dozen words--and Dimmy was

exceedingly grateful.

Nay, his friendship extended further: he saw Demaine as they all got up

from table nervously stuffing a corner of the cloth in mistake for his

handkerchief into his trousers pocket.

“Look out, Dimmy!” he said.

Dimmy jumped, and the tablecloth jumped with him, and then a crash--a

great crash of broken glass, and the falling of candles.

Mary Smith was very nearly annoyed, but on such an occasion she forgave

him.

* * * * *

North of the Park, for now two hours, Lord Repton of Giggleswick had

slept an easy sleep.

ON THE PSEUDOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF CARYLL’S GANGLIA

A PAMPHLET

_Which the reader need not read. It is quite as easy to understand the

book without it._

Extract from a lecture delivered, for a grossly insufficient fee, by

a professor of great popular reputation at the Royal Institution on

January 26th, 1915:--

“The _Review of Comparative Biology_ in its October issue contained a

short and modest paper over the name of Henry Upton which is destined

to influence modern thought more profoundly than anything that has

appeared since _Lux Mundi_ or the _Origin of Species_. Henry Upton has

been taken from us. Or, to use a phrase consecrated by his own reverent

quotation of it, he has ‘Passed beyond the Veil,’ he has crossed the

bar; but short as the time is since this brief essay was given to the

world, his name is already famous.

“You will have heard the echoes of passionate discussions upon his

famous theory; it is my business this afternoon to put before you in

clear and popular language that you can easily understand, what that

theory was; and when I have done so I make no doubt that you will see

why it has been thought so transcendently important.

“Briefly, Henry Upton declared himself finally convinced that between

Man and the Simius Gabiensis there existed a differentiation so marked

as to destroy all possibility of any recent common origin for the two

species.

“When I add that Simius Gabiensis is but the technical name for the

Ringtailed Baboon of our childhood you will at once appreciate what a

revolution such a pronouncement must work if it can be sustained: and

it has been sustained!

“It is common knowledge and will be familiar to the youngest child in

this room that the Ringtailed Baboon is the highest of the Anthropoids,

and the one nearest approaching the majesty of the Human Species--Homo

Sapiens; and if between him and ourselves the link of affinity prove

far removed, it seems indeed as though the whole edifice of modern

biology and of modern thought itself will fall to the ground.

“The superficial differences to be discovered between a cleanly and

well-bred gentleman and the Ringtailed Baboon are common property: the

beard in the Anthropoid is not so clearly defined as in the allied

organism of Man, but covers the whole face; the superciliary arch

is more prominent, the diaphragm tessarated and refulgent, while the

Cardiac Aneries are at once paler and less vasculate in form: the

rings upon the tail are of course peculiar to the Simian, and almost

universally absent in the human species, while the speech of the latter

is far more complex and articulate than that of the former.

“But I need not detain this cultured audience with considerations

quite unworthy of physical science. All the weight of real evidence

pointed to the close relationship between the two types, and it was a

commonplace of the classroom that in all fundamentals the two animals

betrayed an ancestor less remote than that of the dog and the wolf.

Now, since Henry Upton’s work appeared, we are certain that that

ancestor is more remote than the ancestor of the hippopotamus and the

Jersey cow, and probably more remote than that of the mongoose and the

Great Auk.

“In every text-book we read (and we believed the statement) that

between a really poor man and the highest specimens of our race lay a

gulf wider than that which separated the former from the Ringtailed

Baboon and even from the Gorilla and the Barbary Ape. To-day all that

is gone!

“Now let me turn to the evidence. Briefly, again, Henry Upton proved

that CARYLL’S GANGLIA were not, as had been imagined, unimportant or

useless organs, but were organically necessary to the full conduct of

man.

“It had of course been known since Caryll first described and mapped

these ganglia, that they were present in Man and absent in all other

animals. But they were not unique in this, and the obscure part which

they seemed to play in our economy attracted little attention from

the student. Suddenly these humble agglutinations of organic matter

were lifted into the blaze of fame by an Englishman whose name will

not perish so long as our civilisation endures. For Henry Upton showed

that in these ganglia lay the capital distinction between man and his

congener; if I, myself, for instance, differ in any way from ‘Pongo’ in

Regent’s Park, it is to Caryll’s Ganglia, under Providence, that I owe

the privilege.

“Henry Upton was not the man to proceed upon _a priori_ reasoning,

or to state as a conclusion what was still a bare hypothesis. He had

suspected the truth ten years before committing it to print: they were

ten years of anxiety, nay, of agony, during which a bolder or less

scrupulous man might snatch from him the merit of prior discovery; but

he felt it was his duty to Science to continue the vast labour and the

patient research, until he could speak once and for all.

“Upton tabulated in all the enormous number of 57,752 recorded

experiments. He first noted the comparative sizes of the ganglia, in

children and adults, in women and in men, showing them to be larger

in men than in women, and in children rudimentary before the seventh

year. He next proved that in certain professions, notably in those of

the money-lender, the solicitor and the politician, hypertrophy of the

ganglia was to be discovered. The conclusions to which this pointed

will soon be evident. His theory already began to take shape. Luckily

for English science, this great man was possessed of private means. He

organised a staff of enthusiastic young workers who occupied themselves

in treading upon the toes of people in omnibuses, sitting upon top

hats, asking direct questions of slight acquaintances concerning their

financial affairs, and coughing violently and with long, uninterrupted

spasms at the most exciting moments of melodramatic plays. The result

was in each case tabulated, and in over 5·08 per cent. of the cases it

was possible with care to discover the position of the ganglia in those

who responded to the stimuli. Without a single exception the importance

of the ganglia varied directly with the self-restraint exercised

against such stimuli. Those who struck out, swore, or in any other way

betrayed immediate violence, were found to possess small and sometimes

partially atrophied C. G’s. Those who protested sullenly or confined

themselves to angry glances were normal; those who contained themselves

as though nothing had happened, invariably possessed ganglia of a

large and peculiarly healthy type, while those who actually expressed

enjoyment and begged for a repetition of the performance had ganglia of

so astonishing a size as to cause protuberances on either side of the

head, for Caryll’s Ganglia lie (as most of you probably know) a little

south-east and by east of the Aural Cavity.

“It might by this time have seemed sufficiently proved that Caryll’s

Ganglia were the seat of all that restraint and balance upon

which human society depends; but Upton was not satisfied until he

had clinched the process of proof by a negative experiment upon

animals:--And here let me point out in passing that had certain

well-meaning fanatics their own way, this great revelation would never

have been made. The horse, the pig, the common house-fly, the bee, the

dog and the wild goose, to give but a few examples, were severally

tested, and in each case it was discovered that a clout, a fillip, or

any other simple stimulus was at once responded to. In no case was a

trace of Caryll’s Ganglia to be found.

“You all know the end!

“The essay was printed, Upton’s name had already flown to the utmost

corners of the globe, when he read in some obscure narrative of travel

that the little armadillo that can sleep without a pillow, though

possessing no ganglia, was capable of the same balance and restraint

as man, could control himself under all but the most violent stimuli,

conceal his most poignant necessities, and smile in the presence of

death.

“Upton was a Scientist of the Scientists. One single exception and he

would retract from his position. He sailed for the Amazon, interviewed

the armadillo, but at the first pin he thrust into the fleshy portion

of the animal’s steaks, a little below the armoured belt, it belied the

false report by turning savagely round and biting off his head. His

remains were reverently brought home to London. He lies in Westminster

Abbey, the last and perhaps the greatest of martyrs to scientific

truth.

“If Henry Upton’s immortal achievement seems for a moment to have

broken down the very keystone in the arch of social progress, and to

have made null the whole structure of biological truth; if it leaves

Man no longer propped up by a knowledge of cousinship and brotherhood

with the beasts of the field, but all alone, an exile upon earth,

nevertheless we must take courage. The Bishop of Shoreham has told us

(Etc., etc., etc.).”

_Printed by_

MORRISON & GIBB LIMITED

_Edinburgh_

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Dollars, not pounds.

[2] He did.

[3] [Greek: ... mega sthenos Ôkeanoio

Antyga par pymatên sakeos pyka poiêtoio.]

[4] I refer to Mr. Bulge, and I refer to him both as an actor and as an

author. Amen.

[5] There are two such farthings in the Heygate family to-day.

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES:

Italicized text is surrounded by underscores: _italics_.

Obvious typographical errors have been corrected.

Inconsistencies in hyphenation have been standardized.

Archaic or alternate spelling that may have been in use at the time of

publication has been retained.

End of Project Gutenberg's A Change in the Cabinet, by Hilaire Belloc

A Change in the Cabinet · 第 15 / 15 章