AVES. (_Birds._)

Tell me, my dear child, when you have seen birds taking their flight

into the air, and going boldly to their object, without a thought of

all the barriers, ditches, rivers, and mountains, which hinder man at

every step in his travels, did it never strike you to wish for their

wings, and imagine how you would fly off if you had them? If you ever

dreamt this dream, do not apologise for it; it is one as old as the

world. 'Oh that I had wings like a dove!' cried the Prophet, nearly

3,000 years ago; and the dialogue of the swallow and the prisoner, so

often sung by poets, has been repeated in prose behind all the

prison-bars on the globe since prisons were first invented.

Now you will not think it kind on my part, but I must undeceive you

about this fancy, as you will be undeceived some day about many others.

The wings of a dove or swallow would be of no use to you if you had

them, any more than the formidable swords of the middle ages would be

to our modern gentlemen, were any one to put such into their hands.

We are not adapted for them, nor they for us.

You saw, some time ago, what an amount of muscular exertion was required

for running--what a violent flow of blood, what hurried play of the

lungs. Now in flying it is still worse; for the earth, at any rate,

holds us up quite naturally, whereas the air will not hold up the bird

unless it is beaten vigorously and unremittingly by an untiring wing.

If we men, constructed as we are, had to do such work, we should be

out of breath at once; the heart would cry out immediately for quarter,

and the diaphragm turn red with anger. And only just imagine in what

a critical position a poor wretch launched into the air on the wings

of a swallow would find himself when, at the end of five minutes, his

servants should refuse point-blank to go on working at a height of 500

feet above the ground!

But a bird has not these internal rebellions to fear. In the first

place, it has no diaphragm; so here is another friend to whom we must

say good-bye. We shall not meet with him again anywhere. The journey

we are taking together, my dear, is somewhat like the journey of life.

One sets off, surrounded by friends and acquaintances, but whoever

travels on to the end is apt to find himself alone at last; this is

what is happening to the digestive tube, which we shall see losing all

its accessories, one by one, as we gradually advance in our study.

Even now here is one essential fundamental difference in the internal

machinery. The body has only one compartment instead of two; and the

lungs, masters of the whole space, extend freely to its utmost depths.

When a fowl is cut up at table, look along the body, and you will find

lodged in the cavity of the ribs, a long, blackish, and spongy mass:

this is the lungs. There is not, therefore, the same danger of a bird's

getting out of breath as with us; that delicate board which is found

in our bellows is wanting in his. His is set in action solely by the

to-and-fro movement of the ribs, which is produced by muscular

exertions, which are greatly increased during the action of the wings.

From which it follows, that the rapidity of flight itself regulates

the arrival of air, and consequently the expenditure of strength, or,

if you like better, the activity of the fire, since the energy of the

muscles depends, as we have seen, upon the quantity of oxygen that

feeds the internal stove.

This is not all. These elongated lungs are still not sufficient to

furnish the blood with all the oxygen demanded by this excessive labor

of flight. They are pierced with holes, through which issue pipes which

carry the air all over the body. You know what is said of

spendthrifts?-that they burn the candle at both ends. It is so with

the blood of birds. That fillip which in our case it receives in the

lungs, and which sends it back full of vigor into the arteries, is

repeated in the bird at the other end of the arteries as well. The

capillaries, those delicate vessels at the end of the arteries, plunge

from all sides into little reservoirs of air-lungs, therefore-where

the blood renews its provision of oxygen, and relights its

half-extinguished fire, so that it sends the combustion afresh into

the muscles on its return back to the heart, and sets them going a

second time.

The natural consequence of this prodigality of combustion is, that

there must be, in proportion, much more oxygen in birds than in us;

and that of all animals a bird is the one most quickly poisoned by his

own carbonic acid when the air is not renewed around him. Therefore,

let me beg you never to think of putting a poor little bird under a

wine-glass, as a child of my acquaintance once did, that she might

examine her little friend more closely. In the twinkling of an eye he

would consume all the oxygen inside his prison, and you would soon see

him fall upon his side and die.

On the other hand, the temperature of these flying machines, which

consume so much oxygen, is very much higher than ours. It rises to

41°, 42° (centigrade), and sometimes to 44°, 7° higher than with us.

If ever you have taken hold of a little bird, you will have remarked

how warm it makes your hand: this is quite natural, since there is

always a double fire going on within him, to meet the extraordinary

expenditure of strength that is required of him whenever he takes wing.

Besides, do but look at the poor little creature when you have

imprisoned it in a cage! How it goes up! How it comes down! How it

hops from one perch to another, with a quick sudden movement, like

that of a spring when it unbends. There is no apparent cause for this

state of continual agitation; and yet there is a cause, and only too

serious a one. Its fire is not slackened because you have put it into

a cage, and its muscles, lashed furiously on by the double-oxygenized

blood, drive it hap-hazard into a thousand movements, in which it

expends, as best it can, a superabundance of power, which no longer

finds natural employment. Little children, who are the real

singing-birds of our homes, and whose blood also drives much more

energetically along than ours--little children I say--often fare no

better than caged birds in those larger cages we call schools; and

schoolmasters and governesses would scold rather less if they thought

rather more about this. It is right, I do not deny it, that the

rebellious young rogues should be taught in good time not to abandon

themselves, like wild birds, to the mere animal impulses of the blood:

but, in dealing with them, one must also make allowances, as they say,

for the fire within, and know how to open the cage now and then. It

is not for you, however, that I say this, young lady: you are no longer

a little child; but it may happen that you may have some to take care

of some day. Believe me, then, you must not expect too much wisdom

from them, and you must allow them to change their perch every now and

then. It is a law of our Almighty Father that little children, and

little birds, should not stay too long in one place.

The mechanism of the circulation is here the same as with us, and does

not offer any important peculiarity. Only the left ventricle of the

heart has walls of extreme thickness, which enable it to launch the

blood into the members with greater vigor and rapidity; and the blood

itself, although it is composed of precisely the same materials as

that of the mammals, differs from it nevertheless as regards the

globules. In the first place, they are more numerous; secondly, they

are larger; and finally, instead of being round like a plate, they are

drawn out ovally, and are almost shaped like those long dishes on which

fish is usually served. I shall not attempt to give you the reason of

their size and form. This is hidden from us in the same mystery which

envelopes all the microscopic population of the blood; but is it not

a curious thing, this strange persistency of form in the globules ofall

animals of one class? In all birds they are oval; in all mammals

they are round. In all? Nay, I am wrong. As if the better to hide from

us the key to this riddle, nature has amused herself by making an

exception. Camels and llamas, I forgot to tell you, have also globules

in the form of long dishes, like the hen and the chaffinch. Find out

why, if you can. As to the reason of the number, it is a very simple

one. Since the energy of the blood resides in the globules, it follows

that the most energetic blood will contain the largest amount of

globules. Looking at you, for instance, little monkey, running and

jumping about the garden, I would lay a wager, without counting first,

that there are, in one drop of your blood, some millions more globules

than in one of mine.

Let us now go on to the digestion, with which, properly, we ought to

have begun; but I preferred pointing out to you, first, the particular

character which is the chief mark of distinction in the organization

of the bird.

'When hens grow teeth,' says a shrewd proverb, meaning of course,

_never_. Birds have no teeth, and in this respect there is no

variety among them. All, from the first to the last, have uniformly

the same tool to eat with--the bill, that is--which is, in all cases,

composed of the same elements, two jawbones elongated to a point, and

clothed in a horny armour, which makes their edges sharp and cutting.

At the same time were we to review the birds in detail, as we have

done the mammals, you would see that there are almost more modifications

to be observed in this one single instrument than in our thirty-two

teeth. All birds have a beak, but each has his own, organized expressly

with reference to the kind of food needed by its owner. The eagle's

beak, which mangles living prey, is pointed, bent, and hard as steel;

the bill of the duck, which laps up water from ponds and puddles, in

order to get worms and half-decomposed refuse out of it, is soft, and

flattened like a shovel. The woodpecker's, which has to pierce the

trunks of trees, is like a pickaxe; that of the humming-bird, which

has to suck up the juice of flowers from the bottom of their corollas,

is slender as a needle. The swallow feeds on flies, which it snaps up

on the wing, and has a soft bill, which opens like a little oven. The

stork picks up reptiles in the mud of the marshes; its beak is

straight-pointed, cutting as a knife, and resembles a long pair of

pincers. The sparrow feeds especially on hard grains, difficult to

break; accordingly its beak is stumpy, short, and thick, and is arched

on the upper side for still further solidity. But I should never end

if I began to enumerate all the thousand varieties in the bills of

birds. Each variety, too, corresponds with some peculiar sort of life,

and consequently with a general conformation (easily ascertained) of

the animal in which it appears. Give a naturalist the bill of a

bird--only its bill remember--and he will tell you half its history

without fear of being mistaken.

On the other hand, we must not deceive ourselves as to the real value

of this complaisant bill. Let it transform itself as it pleases into

all manner of forms for the better fulfilment of its task, it makes,

at the best, but a very poor instrument for mastication; nay, to say

the truth, it breaks, cuts, and tears, but it never masticates at all.

Thus the bird's mouthful is far from undergoing as perfect a preparation

as ours does. It is no sooner taken in than it is swallowed, and the

salivary glands, which are still to be found under the tongue, seem

only to be there as a matter of form; what little saliva they produce

is thick and sticky, and has none of the qualities necessary for making

that liquid paste which our tongue sweeps up from every corner of the

mouth. Besides, it must be owned that a bird's tongue would be a very

awkward implement in such a task. Open a hen's bill and you will see

therein a very inferior sort of porter. It is merely a dry hard lance,

as it were, armed with prickles at the point, as ill-qualified for

tasting as for sweeping. So the hen does not waste her time in finding

out the flavor of what is thrown to her. She picks up and swallows

over and over again, without appearing to experience any other pleasure

than that of satisfying her appetite. Birds of prey, it is true, have

rather more convenient tongues, capable, moreover, of tasting up to

a certain point; and the parrot, who is a complete epicure, and chews

his food philosophically, has a charming-little black one, thick,

fleshy, and susceptible--a true porter, in fact-who enables Polly

thoroughly to enjoy her breakfast. But certain birds who live on insects

surpass even the hen in the dryness and hardness of their tongues.

That of the woodpecker, especially, is a model of the kind, and deserves

a few words more than the others. Picture to yourselves a long pin,

terminated by an iron point with barbs like those of fish-hooks. An

ingenious mechanism enables the bird to dart it out with the rapidity

of lightning, far beyond his bill, upon the insects to which he gives

chase. The point pierces them, and the hooks retain them, without any

need of assistance from the bill. I have just told you that this bill

pierces the bark of trees; but it only plays the part of gamekeepers

on grand sporting occasions, who beat the bushes to make the game rise.

The woodpecker's bill routs up the insects by destroying their shelter;

but the real sportsman is the tongue. Good-bye to any notion of a cosy

little chat in such a porter's lodge as that! What could a harpoon

have to say for itself?

Do not, however, let this miserable entrance-hall alarm you, at the

same time, for the fate of the mouthful thus presented half-dressed

to the œsophagus. You will find it only so much the better treated

within. In the first place, the œsophagus, when half-way down to the

stomach, swells out suddenly and forms a pocket, which is generally

particularly well developed in birds who feed on grain; this is called

the _crop_ in English, in French _jabot_; whence comes the application

of that word to those full shirt-frills which have sometimes been the

fashion. It is the pigeon's _crop_ that gives him the rounded chest over

which he bridles so prettily. The crop is a receptacle where the food

makes a halt: it is something between the pouch of the monkey and the

paunch of the ox; a preparatory stomach, which does not, it is true,

send back the grain to the bill, for the bill could do it no good, but

in which that grain lies until there is room for it further on.

Prom thence it resumes its journey; but, before reaching the true

stomach, it passes through a second enlargement of the oesophagus,

whose walls are pitted with numberless little cavities, from which

pour over it the juices destined to supply the place of the saliva

that was wanting above.

It reaches its destination at last, but still hard, and generally

whole. No matter, however. The stomach which receives it, and which

is called the gizzard, is quite a different sort of thing from a useless

membrane, thin and delicate like ours. It is a thick muscle of enormous

power, lined inside with a kind of horny skin, so tough that nothing

can break through it. You may form some idea of the prodigious strength

of this organ, when I tell you that turkey-fowls have been made to

swallow hollow balls of glass, so thick as not to break when dropped

to the ground, and that at the end of a few days they have been found

reduced almost to powder in the uninjured stomach. No fear of

indigestion with such an apparatus as that. Though the grain may not

have been masticated in the bill, what does it signify? There is a

power here, as you see, quite equal to carrying the whole work through.

Thanks, indeed, to the invaluable horn which lines it, fowls which

have no teeth of their own can safely present themselves with as many

and as hard ones as they please. They swallow small pebbles, which rub

against the grain, during the contractions of the gizzard, and act

just as effectually as if they were fixed in the jawbone. Well, this

terrible gizzard performs its crushing work with such energy, that not

only the grain but the pebbles themselves are ground down there, and

end by being pounded into fine sand. When you rear fowls, do not forget,

if you keep them shut up, to put within their reach a store of small

pebbles, so that they may have teeth to run to in time of need.

You remember the _pylorus_--the porter down below, who keeps the

door of egress from our stomach? He is as badly provided for here as

his fellow-workmen up above; worse in fact. It is a gaping hole, and

we cannot expect a very strict supervision from it. Birds who feed on

fruits profit by this fact to carry vegetables from one country to

another. With such an easy opening, seeds have a good many chances of

passing from the stomach unaltered; and then they drop from the clouds,

as is supposed, hap-hazard, and germinate afterwards, when circumstances

prove favorable, to grow up before the astonished eyes of the natives

into plants of which they have never even heard. The French

Acclimatization Society, which I spoke of lately, and which, though

so modern, has correspondents all over the globe, is at this moment

laboring to effect an exchange between all countries of the natural

productions of their soil. But here you see that nature had thought

of this before, and established her acclimatization society long ago.

To complete the internal work of digestion, so feebly begun in the

bill, an extremely large liver pours torrents of bile into the duodenum,

and the manufacture of chyle proceeds with that wild rapidity which

characterizes all the living actions of birds. But speaking of this

liver, I think I ought to give you an account of a celebrated dish,

considered a great dainty by epicures, called _pâtés de foies

gras_--_fat liver patties_, to translate it into its meaning.

Very likely you will not care to eat them after hearing my story; but

that will be no great loss to you, for it is a very indigestible sort

of food, and not at all good for children.

You remember my telling you about Englishmen going to India and coming

back with a liver-complaint, from having eaten and drunk more than the

climate allowed? By an imitation of this process, human

ingenuity--occasionally so cruel--has created the _pâtés de foies

gras_, the glory of Strasburg. I have been in the country, and can

tell you how it is managed. They shut a goose up in a square box, where

there is just room for his body. They open his bill at feeding-time,

and cram down with the finger as much food as can be got in. This is

throttling rather than feeding it. The poor beast, who can use no

resistance, since it cannot move, and who is kept in the dark to prevent

excitement; the poor beast is quite unable to burn all the mass of

combustibles with which the blood soon finds itself loaded. This carries

them to the liver to be turned into bile; but the liver is not equal

to the work, becomes loaded in its turn by unemployed materials, and

grows and grows, till at last, having filled up all the space around

it, it stops the play of the heart and lungs. When the animal is

nearly suffocated they kill it; and this is how we come to have _pâtés

de foies gras_ to eat! If they give us a fit of indigestion

afterwards, it is a vengeance we richly deserve. At Toulouse, where

the same trade is carried on on a large scale, they used formerly to

go even beyond this. They fastened the goose by the feet before the

fire-place, after having put out its eyes. The imitation of the

Englishman's proceeding was still more perfect here, for the fire acted

the part of the Indian sun to perfection. I do not know that part of

the country well enough to tell you whether they have quite given up

this piece of wicked ingenuity; all I can say is, I devoutly hope so.

The intestine of birds is much shorter than that of mammals. Here

everything is done at full gallop, and the chyle has not to go far

before it is absorbed. I have before me a book, in which I am told

that the wagtails eaten in France can be fattened in twenty-four hours,

if you only know how to set about it, and these birds are not rare;

they belong to the same family as the red-breasts, the tomtits, and

the nightingale. Thrushes and wheatears (ortolans) require, for the

same purpose, four or five days in the same country, left to themselves

to roam about, when the vine keeps open table for them.

This incredible quickness, not only in digesting, but, what is much

more, in transforming food into fresh living material

(_assimilating_ it, as it is called), has often a fatal result

for the bird. He is prohibited from fasting; his life is a fire of

straw, which must be replenished unceasingly, or it will die out in

the twinkling of an eye. Our own little birds--children--eat oftener

than grown-up people, and if by any accident they are kept waiting

awhile, they soon cry out with hunger. You know this, do you not? Well,

then, if any one should give you a bird to keep in a cage, remember

that you have undertaken a great responsibility, and that it will not

do to be careless with him. To neglect feeding him for one day is to

run the risk of finding him starved to death next morning. With this

warning, I will conclude my chapter on birds. I hope I have not spoken

in vain in behalf of those poor little captive songsters, whose fragile

lives are at the mercy of their young masters and mistresses.

The history of a mouthful of bread · 第 79 / 95 题