Mr. EISENBERG. Is this weapon----

The CHAIRMAN. I didn't get that last.

Mr. FRAZIER. It showed the effects of wear and corrosion.

Mr. EISENBERG. Is this weapon used when it is sold into the United

States?

Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, it is a surplus type of weapon.

Mr. EISENBERG. So that it is impossible to attribute any given amount

of wear to the last user?

Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, sir; it is impossible.

Mr. EISENBERG. Have you measured the dimensions of this rifle

assembled, and disassembled?

Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, I have.

Mr. EISENBERG. Could you give us that information?

Mr. FRAZIER. The overall length is 40.2 inches. It weighs 8 pounds even.

Mr. McCLOY. With the scope?

Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, with the scope.

The CHAIRMAN. And the sling?

Mr. FRAZIER. That is with the sling, yes, sir. The sling weighs 4-3/4

ounces. The stock length is 34.8 inches, which is the wooden portion

from end to end with the butt plate attached. The barrel and action

from the muzzle to the rear of the tang, which is this portion at the

rearmost portion of the metal, is 28.9 inches. The barrel only is 21.18

inches.

Mr. EISENBERG. When you say, "this portion," Mr. Frazier, I don't think

that is coming down clear in the record. I wonder whether you could

rephrase that so as to describe the part of the barrel or part of the

stock to which you are pointing when you say "tang."

Mr. FRAZIER. The tang is the rear of the receiver of the weapon into

which the rear mounting screw is screwed to hold the rearmost part of

the metal action of the weapon into the wooden stock. From the end of

that portion to the muzzle of the weapon is 28.9 inches.

Mr. EISENBERG. And the length of the longest component when the rifle

is dissembled, Mr. Frazier?

Mr. FRAZIER. 34.8 inches, which is the length of the stock, the wooden

portion.

Mr. EISENBERG. Can you describe to us the telescopic sight on the rifle

in terms of----

Mr. McCLOY. Before you get to the sight, can I ask a question?

Mr. EISENBERG. Surely.

Mr. McCLOY. How soon after the assassination did you examine this rifle?

Mr. FRAZIER. We received the rifle the following morning.

Mr. McCLOY. Received it in Washington?

Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, sir.

Mr. McCLOY. And you immediately made your examination of it then?

Mr. FRAZIER. We made an examination of it at that time, and kept it

temporarily in the laboratory.

It was then returned to the Dallas Police Department, returned again to

the laboratory--the second time on November 27th, and has been either

in the laboratory's possession or the Commission's possession since

then.

Mr. McCLOY. When you examined the rifle the first time, you said that

it showed signs of some corrosion and wear?

Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, sir.

Mr. McCLOY. Was it what you would call pitted, were the lands in good

shape?

Mr. FRAZIER. No, sir; the lands and the grooves were worn, the corners

were worn, and the interior of the surface was roughened from corrosion

or wear.

Mr. McCLOY. Was there metal fouling in the barrel?

Mr. FRAZIER. I did not examine it for that.

Mr. McCLOY. Could you say roughly how many rounds you think had been

fired since it left the factory, with the condition of the barrel as

you found it?

Mr. FRAZIER. No, sir; I could not, because the number of rounds is not

an indication of the condition of the barrel, since if a barrel is

allowed to rust, one round will remove that rust and wear the barrel

to the same extent as 10 or 15 or 50 rounds just fired through a clean

barrel.

Mr. McCLOY. Thank you.

Mr. EISENBERG. Could you describe the telescopic sight on the rifle?

Magnification, country of origin?

Mr. FRAZIER. It is a four-power telescopic sight employing crosshairs

in it as a sighting device, in the interior of the scope.

It is stamped "Optics Ordnance Incorporated, Hollywood California,"

and under that is the inscription "Made in Japan." It is a very

inexpensive Japanese telescopic sight.

The mount attached to it was also made in Japan.

Mr. EISENBERG. Have you removed the mount?

Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, I have.

Mr. EISENBERG. How many holes did you find drilled into the receiver?

Mr. FRAZIER. There are two holes in the receiver.

Mr. EISENBERG. Could you form an opinion as to whether these were

original holes or whether new holes--new and larger holes had been

formed over the original holes?

Mr. FRAZIER. Normally, the receiver would have no holes at all, and

would have to be drilled and tapped for the screws. In the sight itself

there normally are three holes, two of which have been enlarged to

accommodate the two mounting screws presently holding the mount to the

rifle.

Mr. EISENBERG. Do you think, based on your experience with types of

screws used in mounts, that these were the original screws and the

original holes for the screws?

Mr. FRAZIER. I could not say--I could not answer that specifically.

However, they appear to be the same type of screw as is present on the

rest of the mount--although they are somewhat larger in size than the

remaining hole which is present in the lower portion of the mount.

Mr. EISENBERG. Now, I now hand you a rifle which is marked C-250. Are

you familiar with this rifle?

Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, sir.

Mr. EISENBERG. Can you describe it briefly?

Mr. FRAZIER. It is an identical rifle physically to the rifle

Commission's Exhibit 139, in that it is the same caliber, 6.5-mm.

Mannlicher-Carcano Italian Military rifle, Model 91/38.

Mr. EISENBERG. Did you attempt to determine by use of this rifle

whether the scope was mounted on Exhibit 139 by the firm which is

thought to have sold Exhibit 139?

Mr. FRAZIER. Would you repeat that, please?

Mr. EISENBERG. Yes.

Did you make an attempt to determine, by use of this C-250, whether the

firm which had sold Exhibit 139 had mounted the scope on Exhibit 139?

Mr. FRAZIER. Yes, sir.

Mr. EISENBERG. Can you describe how you made that attempt?

Mr. FRAZIER. We contacted the firm, Klein's Sporting Goods in Chicago,

and asked them concerning this matter to provide us with a similar

rifle mounted in the way in which they normally mount scopes of this

type on these rifles, and forward the rifle to us for examination.

In this connection, we did inform them that the scope should be in

approximately this position on the frame of the weapon.

Mr. EISENBERG. Pardon me, Mr. Frazier. When you say "this position," so

that the record is clear could you----

Mr. FRAZIER. Oh, yes; in the position in which it now is, approximately

three-eighths of an inch to the rear of the receiver ring.

Warren Commission (03 of 26): Hearings Vol. III (of 15) · 第 261 / 320 题