THE NINTH BOOK. 1668-1676.

1668.

In the beginning of the year 1668, William Penn, son of admiral sir

William Penn, began to show himself openly an adherer to, and an

asserter of the doctrine of those called Quakers. He had been trained

up in the university of Oxford, and he was afterwards by his father

sent into France, where for some time he lived, (as himself once told

me,) with the famous preacher, Moyses Amyraut. After a considerable

stay in that kingdom, being returned and come into Ireland, he once

went to a meeting of those called Quakers, which being disturbed,

he, though finely clothed as a young gentleman, and wearing a great

perriwig, was with others carried from thence to prison, where by his

fellow prisoners, he was more confirmed in that doctrine which he

already apprehended to be truth. But when it come to be known that he

was the son of Admiral Penn, he was soon released. This change did not

a little grieve his father, who intended to have trained him up for the

court; but now saw his eldest son in the early part, being about the

twenty-second year of his age, entered into the society of the despised

Quakers. Several means were used, nay even his necessaries were

withheld from him, to draw him off, if possible, and bring him to other

resolutions. But all devices and wiles proved in vain: for he continued

steadfast, and conversed much with Josiah Coale, who likewise in his

young years came over to the Quakers.

This summer Stephen Crisp was prisoner at Ipswich, where the number of

friends was considerably increased by his ministry. I, with some other

friends of Holland, visited him there in prison, and we found him in a

cheerful condition, as well contented as if he had been at liberty: for

he suffered for the ministry of the gospel, and continued to preach in

prison when his friends came to visit him.

The journey which G. Fox made this year through England and Wales I

pass by. The latter part of the summer he returned to London, where

with great satisfaction I heard him preach several times before a

numerous auditory: for about that time, the meetings of dissenters

were not disturbed at London, but all was so quiet, that the

Quakers, so called, were suffered to build a large meeting place in

Gracechurch-street, where the first time a meeting was kept, I was

present, and saw G. Fox, and heard him preach there, besides some

others.

Whilst he was at London, he gave a visit to esquire Marsh, who now

was a justice of the peace in Middlesex, and it so happened that he

was at dinner when G. Fox came to his house, which so pleased him,

that he kindly invited him to sit down with him to dinner, but G.

Fox courteously excused himself. There were at that time several

great persons at table with justice Marsh, who said to one of them,

(a Papist,) ‘Here is a Quaker you have not seen before.’ From this

the said Papist took occasion to ask G. Fox, whether he did own the

christening of children? To which G. Fox answered, there was no

Scripture for any such practice. ‘What!’ said he, ‘not for christening

children?’ ‘Nay,’ replied G. Fox, ‘the one baptism by the one Spirit

into one body, we own; but to throw a little water on a child’s face,

and to call that baptizing and christening it, there is no Scripture

for that.’ Then the Roman Catholic asked him, whether he did not own

the Catholic Faith? ‘Yes,’ said G. Fox, but he added, that neither

the pope nor the Papists were in that Catholic Faith; since the true

faith worked by love, and purified the heart; and if they were in

that faith which gives victory, by which they might have access to

God, they would not talk to the people of a purgatory after death;

neither would they ever use prisons, racks, or fines, to force others

to their religion; because that was not the practice of the apostles

and primitive Christians; but it was the practice of the faithless

Jews and heathens, to use such forcing means. ‘But,’ continued G.

Fox, ‘seeing thou art a great and leading man among the Papists, and

sayest, there is no salvation but in your church, I desire to know of

thee, what it is that bringeth salvation in your church,’ To this the

Roman Catholic answered, ‘A good life:’ ‘And nothing else?’ said G.

Fox. ‘Yes,’ replied the other, ‘good works.’ ‘Is this your doctrine and

principle,’ said G. Fox. ‘Yes,’ said he. Then G. Fox replied, ‘Neither

thou nor the pope, nor any of the Papists know, what it is that brings

salvation.’ Then the Roman Catholic asked him, what brings salvation

into your church? G. Fox answered, ‘That which brought salvation to

the church in the apostles’ days, namely, the grace of God, which the

Scripture says brings salvation, and hath appeared to all men; and

teaches us to deny ungodliness, and worldly lusts, and to live godly,

righteously, and soberly in this present world. By this it appears, it

is not the good works, nor the good life, that brings the salvation,

but the grace.’ ‘What!’ said the Roman Catholic, ‘doth this grace,

that brings salvation, appear unto all men?’ ‘Yes,’ said G. Fox. ‘I

deny that,’ returned the other. ‘All that deny that,’ replied G. Fox,

‘are sect-makers, and are not in the universal faith, grace, and

truth, which the apostles were in.’ Then the Roman Catholic began to

speak about the mother-church, which gave occasion to much discourse,

and G. Fox asserted, that if any outward place had claim to be the

mother-church, above all other churches, that Jerusalem had much more

right to it than Rome. But in conclusion he said, that there was no

other mother-church but Jerusalem, which is above, and is free, and

which is the mother of us all, as saith the apostle. Upon this subject

G. Fox did so paraphrase, that esquire Marsh said at length to the

Roman Catholic, ‘O you do not know this man. If he would but come to

church now and then, he would be a brave man.’

After some other discourse together, G. Fox, got an opportunity to go

aside with the said Marsh into another room, and to desire that he who

had much of the management of affairs, would prevent the persecution

of his friends as much as possibly he could. Marsh showed himself not

averse to this, but said, he was in a strait how to act between the

Quakers and some other dissenters. ‘For,’ said he, ‘you say ye cannot

swear, and the Independents, Baptists, and Fifth-monarchy people, say

also, they cannot swear.’ To this G. Fox said, ‘I will show thee how

to distinguish: the members of those societies thou speakest of, do

swear in some cases, but we cannot swear in any case. If any one should

steal their cows or horses, and thou shouldest ask them whether they

would swear they were theirs? Many of them would readily do it. But

if thou triest our friends, they cannot swear for their own goods.

Therefore when thou puttest the oath of allegiance to any of them,

ask them whether they can swear in any other case; as for their cow

or horse? Which if they be really of us, they cannot do, though they

can hear witness to the truth.’ Then G. Fox gave him a relation of a

trial in Berkshire, viz. ‘A thief having stolen two beasts from one of

those called Quakers, was imprisoned; but somebody having informed the

judge, that the man that prosecuted was a Quaker, and he, (the judge,)

perceiving that he would not swear, would not hear what the man could

say, but tendered him the oath of allegiance and supremacy, which the

said Quaker refusing, the judge premunired him, and let the thief go

free.’

Esquire Marsh having heard this relation, said that judge was a wicked

man. And by what G. Fox had told him, he sufficiently perceived how he

might distinguish between the Quakers and other people. True it is,

the Baptists in those days made some profession of the unlawfulness of

swearing, but when they came to be tried on that account, they soon

desisted from that part of their profession, as will be shown more at

large in the sequel. But they and the Independents, &c. were very loth

to take the oath of allegiance, because of a grudge they had to the

government; and this was well known to those that were at the helm.

But the innocent Quakers were continually exposed to the malice of

their persecutors, and bore the hardest shock of the laws made against

dissenters. But now justice Marsh did not omit to free the Quakers

from persecution as much as was in his power; for he kept several

from being premunired in those parts where he was a justice. And when

sometimes he could not avoid sending those that were brought before

him to prison, he sent some only for a few hours, or for a night. And

even this was such hard work to him, that at length he told the king,

he had sent some of the Quakers to prison contrary to his conscience,

and that he could not do so any more. He also advised the king to give

liberty of conscience: and he was so serviceable to stop the violence

of persecution, that about this time little was heard about disturbing

of meetings.

About the forepart of this year, if I mistake not, there happened a

case at Edmondsbury, which I cannot well pass by in silence, viz. A

certain young woman being delivered of a bastard child, destroyed it,

and was therefore committed to prison: whilst she was in jail, it is

said William Bennit, a prisoner for conscience-sake, came to her, and

in discourse asked her, whether during the course of her life, she had

not many times transgressed against her conscience? And whether she

had not often thereupon felt secret checks and inward reproofs, and

been troubled in her mind because of the evil committed; and this he

did in such a convincing way, that she not only assented to what he

laid before her, but his discourse so reached her heart, that she came

clearly to see, that if she had not been so stubborn and disobedient

to those inward reproofs, in all probability she would not have come

to such a miserable fall as now she had: for man not desiring the

knowledge of God’s ways, and departing from him, is left helpless, and

cannot keep himself from evil, though it may be such as formerly he

would have abhorred in the highest degree, and have said with Hazael,

‘What, is thy servant a dog, that he should do this great thing?’ W.

Bennit thus opening matters to her, did by his wholesome admonition so

work upon her mind, that she who never had conversed with the Quakers,

and was altogether ignorant of their doctrine, now came to apprehend

that it was the grace of God that brings salvation, which she so

often had withstood; and that this grace had not yet quite forsaken

her, but now made her sensible of the greatness of her transgression.

This consideration wrought so powerfully, that from a most grievous

sinner, she became a true penitent, and with hearty sorrow she cried

to the Lord, that it might please him not to hide his countenance. And

continuing in this state of humiliation, and sincere repentance, and

persevering in supplication, she felt in time some ease; and giving

heed to the exhortations of the said Bennit, she attained at length

to a sure hope of forgiveness by the precious blood of the immaculate

Lamb, who died for the sins of the world.

Of this she gave manifest proofs at her trial before judge Matthew

Hale, who having heard how penitent she was, would fain have spared

her, having on purpose caused to be inserted in the indictment, that

she had committed the fact wilfully and designedly. But she being

asked according to the form, ‘Guilty or not guilty?’ Readily answered,

‘Guilty.’ This astonished the judge, who purposely had got the words

wilfully and designedly inserted in the indictment, that from thence

she might find occasion to deny the charge, and so to quash the

indictment; and therefore he told her, that she seemed not duly to

consider what she said; since it could not well be believed that such

a one as she, who it may be inconsiderately had roughly handled her

child, should have killed it wilfully and designedly. Here the judge

opened a back door for her to avoid the penalty of death. But now the

fear of God had got so much room in her heart, that no tampering would

do; no fig leaves could serve her for a cover; for she knew now that

this would have been adding sin to sin, and to cover herself with a

covering, but not of God’s Spirit; and therefore she plainly signified

to the court, that indeed she had committed the mischievous fact

intendedly, thereby to hide her shame; and that she having sinned thus

grievously, and being affected now with true repentance, she could by

no means excuse herself, but was willing to undergo the punishment

the law required; and therefore she could not but acknowledge herself

guilty, since otherwise how could she expect forgiveness from the Lord?

This undisguised and free confession, being spoken with a serious

countenance, did so affect the judge, that tears trickling down his

face, he sorrowfully said, ‘Woman, such a case as this I never met

with before; perhaps you, who are but young, and speak so piously, as

being struck to the heart with repentance, might yet do much good in

the world: but now you force me, that _ex officio_ I must pronounce

sentence of death against you, since you will admit of no excuse.’

Standing to what she had said, the judge pronounced sentence of death.

And when afterward she came to the place of execution, she made a

pathetical speech to the people, exhorting the spectators, especially

those that were young, ‘To have the fear of God before their eyes,

to give heed to his secret reproofs for evil, and so not to grieve

and resist the good spirit of the Lord; which she herself not having

timely minded, it had made her run on in evil, and thus proceeding

from wickedness to wickedness, it had brought her to this dismal exit.

But since she firmly trusted to God’s infinite mercy, nay surely

believed her sins, though of a bloody dye, to be washed off by the

pure blood of Christ, she could contentedly depart this life.’ Thus

she preached at the gallows the doctrine of the Quakers, so called,

and gave heart-melting proofs that her immortal soul was to enter

into paradise, as well as anciently that of the thief on the cross. I

have been credibly informed by a person who had it from the mouths of

such as were present at the execution, that in her request to God she

prayed, that it might please him to give a visible sign, that she was

received into his favour. And that though it was then a cloudy day, yet

immediately after she was turned off, the clouds broke a little, and

the sun for a few moments shined upon her face, and presently after

ceased shining, and the sky continued overcast. She thus in a serious

frame of mind, suffered death, which her crime justly deserved.

This year at London died Thomas Loe, a man of an excellent gift, who

zealously had laboured in the ministry of the gospel in Ireland, and by

his preaching had brought many over into the society of his friends,

and among others also William Penn, to whom on his death-bed he spoke

thus, ‘Bear thy cross, and stand faithful to God; then he will give

thee an everlasting crown of glory, that shall not be taken from thee.

There is no other way which shall prosper than that which the holy men

of old have walked in. God hath brought immortality to light, and life

immortal is felt. Glory, glory to him, for he is worthy of it. His

love overcomes my heart, nay, my cup runs over: glory be to his name

for ever.’ No wonder that this speech of one that was at the point of

entering into eternity, confirmed William Penn exceedingly in that

doctrine, which he had now embraced as truth. At another time Thomas

Loe said to his friends that stood at his bed-side, ‘Be not troubled,

the love of God overcomes my heart.’ And to George Whitehead and others

he said, ‘The Lord is good to me; this day he hath covered me with his

glory. I am weak, but am refreshed to see you. The Lord is good to me.’

Another friend asking him how it was with him, he answered, ‘I am near

leaving you, I think: but am as well in my spirit as I can desire: I

bless the Lord: I never saw more of the glory of God than I have done

this day.’ And when it was thought he was departing, he began to sing

praises to the Lord, saying, ‘Glory, glory to thee for ever!’ Which did

not a little affect the standers by, thus to hear a dying man sing. And

in this glorious state he departed this life the 5th of October.

Now since persecution was at a stand this year at London, those of

other persuasions sometimes bitterly inveighed from the pulpit against

the Quakers, and would challenge them also to a dispute. William

Burnet and Jeremy Ives, eminent Baptist teachers, had encountered

George Whitehead this summer at Chertsey, and Horn, in Surry, about

the resurrection, and Christ’s body in heaven, endeavouring to blacken

the Quakers in respect of those points, because they kept to Scripture

words, from which the others departing, advanced very gross absurdities.

One Thomas Vincent, a Presbyterian teacher, was much disturbed because

some of his auditory were gone over to the society of the Quakers;

and to render them odious, he and his fellow teachers accused them of

erroneous doctrine concerning the Trinity; and this was chiefly because

they did not approve of such expressions as were not to be found in the

holy Scriptures, as that of Three persons. On this subject a dispute

was held in the Presbyterian meeting-house at London, between the said

Vincent on one side, and George Whitehead on the other. That which

Vincent and his brethren advanced first, was an accusation, that the

Quakers held damnable doctrine. George Whitehead denying this, would

have given the people an information of the principles of his friends;

but Vincent instead thereof, stated this question, ‘Do you own one

Godhead, subsisting in three distinct and separate persons?’ Whitehead

and those with him denying this as an unscriptural doctrine, Vincent

framed this syllogism.

‘There are Three that hear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and

the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

‘These are either three manifestations, three operations, three

substances, or three somethings else besides subsistences.

‘But they are not three manifestations, three operations, three

substances, nor three any things else besides subsistences.

Ergo, ‘Three subsistences.’

G. Whitehead rejected these terms, as not to be found in Scripture,

not deducible from the 1 John, v. 7, the place Vincent instanced. And

therefore he desired an explanation of those terms, insomuch as God

did not use to wrap up his truths in heathenish metaphysics, but in

plain language. But whatever was said, no better explanation could

be obtained, than person, or the mode of a substance. G. Whitehead

and William Penn, who also was there, alleged several places from

Scripture, proving God’s complete unity: and they queried how God was

to be understood, if in an abstracted sense from his substance? But

instead of answering the question, they concluded it a point more

fit for admiration than disputation. Then W. Penn denied the minor

proposition of Vincent’s syllogism; ‘For,’ said he, ‘no one substance

can have three distinct subsistences, and preserve its own unity: for

every subsistence will have its own substance; so that three distinct

subsistences, or manners of beings, will require three distinct

substances or beings: consequently three Gods: for if the infinite

godhead subsists in three separate manners or forms, then is not any

one of them a perfect and complete subsistence without the other two:

so parts, and something finite is in God; or if infinite, then three

distinct infinite subsistences; and what is this, but to assert three

Gods, since none is infinite but God? On the contrary, there being an

inseparability betwixt the substance and its subsistence, the unity

of substance will not admit a Trinity of incommunicable or distinct

subsistences.’

After several words on both sides, G. Whitehead, to bring this

strange doctrine nearer to the capacity of the people, comparing

their three persons to three apostles, said, he did not understand,

how Paul, Peter, and John could be three persons and one apostle.

At which one Maddocks, one of Vincent’s assistants, framed this odd

syllogism; ‘He that scornfully and reproachfully compares our doctrine

of the blessed Trinity of Father, Son, and Spirit, one in essence,

but three in persons, to three finite men, as Paul, Peter, and John,

is a blasphemer. But you, G. Whitehead, have done so. Ergo.’ A rash

conclusion; but how firm, let the judicious reader determine. I have

no mind to enter further into this quarrel, since the parties on both

sides went away unsatisfied: for Vincent had not been able to prove the

doctrine of the Quakers damnable, as he had asserted. But his passion

had transported him, as well as when he said from the pulpit to those

of his society, that he had as lief they should go to a bawdy-house,

as to frequent the Quakers’ meetings, because of their erroneous and

damnable doctrines. And pointing to the window he further said, ‘If

there should stand a cup of poison, I would rather drink it, than suck

in their damnable doctrines.’ But this untimely zeal did not profit

him; for it gave occasion to some of his hearers to inquire into the

doctrines of the Quakers; and thus some came to be convinced of the

truth thereof.

Now since the aforesaid dispute made a great noise at London, William

Penn published a book with this title, The Sandy Foundation Shaken, in

which he explained the points controverted, and defended his positions

with good reason and the Holy Scriptures. But yet this book, which he

himself spread, caused such a stir, that it was evil spoken of, and not

long after he was committed to the Tower, and some thought it was not

without his father’s being acquainted with it, perhaps to prevent a

worse treatment.

This was at the latter end of the year, about which time Josiah Coale

fell into a sickness, which took him off the stage of this life; he had

languished long, and yet did not at all spare his voice, but was used

both in preaching and praying so to raise it, that he spent his natural

strength exceedingly, though he was yet as in a flourishing age; nay,

it was his life and joy to declare the gospel, and to proclaim the

word of God, for which he had an excellent ability: and when he spoke

to the ungodly world, an awful gravity appeared in his countenance,

and his words were like a hammer and a sharp sword. But though he was

a son of thunder, yet his agreeable speech flowed from his mouth like

a pleasant stream, to the consolation and comfort of pious souls. Oh!

how pathetically have I heard him pray, when he, as transported and

ravished, humbly beseeched God, that it might please him to reach to

the hard-hearted, to support the godly, and to preserve them steadfast:

nay, with what a charming and melodious voice did he sound forth the

praises of the Most High in his public prayers! but his work was now

done, he had finished his course, and a time of rest from his labours

was come. Although he grew weak, yet his manly spirit and great courage

bore him up for some time; but his disease, which seemed to be a kind

of consumption, at length so increased, that he was fain to keep within

doors for several weeks; then mending a little, he went abroad again,

and came into a meeting in London, where I beheld his countenance

much unlike what it used to be, for it clearly manifested his bodily

indisposition: nevertheless he preached with a godly zeal, and his

salutary exhortations flowed like a stream from his lips, which seemed

to be touched with a coal from the altar of heaven, whilst he was

preaching the gospel to the edification of his hearers. Now he began

to lift up his voice again to that degree, that judging from thence,

one would have supposed him to have been pretty well restored: but the

ground of his distemper not being taken away, he was soon necessitated

to keep at home again; and his natural strength wasted away so fast,

and he so declined, that his death began to be expected, which not very

long after fell out accordingly. A little before he died, G. Fox being

come to see him, asked him, whether any thing lay upon him to write to

the friends in England? But he signified that he had nothing to write,

only desired that his love might be remembered to them, and desired G.

Fox to pray to God, that he might have an easy passage, for he felt

his end approaching. He having complied with his desire, and seeing

him begin to be heavy, bid him go and lie on the bed: which J. Coale

did; but finding this, as it seems, more uneasy, with the help of his

friends he rose again, and sat on the side of the bed; and his friends

sitting about him, he felt himself so lively and powerfully raised,

that he spoke to them after this manner:

‘Well, friends, be faithful to God, and have a single eye to his

glory; and seek nothing for self, or your own glory; and if any

thing of that arise, judge it down by the power of the Lord God,

that so ye may be clear in his sight, and answer his witness in

all people; then will ye have the reward of life. For my part, I

have walked in faithfulness with the Lord; and I have thus far

finished my testimony, and have peace with the Lord: his majesty

is with me, and his crown of life is upon me. So mind my love to

all friends.’ Then he ceased speaking; and a little time after he

said to Stephen Crisp, ‘Dear heart, keep low in the holy seed of

God, and that will be thy crown for ever.’ After a short pause,

he said, ‘a minister of Christ, must walk as he walked.’

A little afterwards fainting, and being stayed by his friends, he

departed in their arms, without the least sigh or groan, but as

one falling into a sweet sleep; and being filled with heavenly

consolations, he passed from this mortal life, to that which is

immortal, having attained the age of thirty-five years and two

months, and preached the gospel about twelve years. He had travelled

much in the West Indies, sustained great hardships, and laboured in

the ministry at his own charge, being freely given up to spend his

substance in the service of the Lord. And though he went through many

persecutions, imprisonments, and other adversities, yet he was not

afraid of danger, but always valiant; and continued in an unmarried

state, that so he might more freely labour in the heavenly harvest, and

many were converted by his ministry. He lived to see the desire of his

heart accomplished; for when first he was raised up to true goodliness,

being under the sense of his former transgressions, he cried to the

Lord for deliverance, and said with David, ‘If thou, O God, wilt help

me thoroughly, then will I teach transgressors thy ways, and sinners

shall be converted unto thee.’ He had been long in a mournful state,

though naturally of a cheerful temper; and having himself passed

through a path of sorrow, he was the more able to comfort the mourners

of Zion. The church was very sensible of this great loss; and I have

reason to think his corpse was attended to the grave by more than a

thousand of his friends, among whom I was then one; and his burying

being very public and well known, drew the eyes of many spectators

towards it. Let none think it strange, that I have here expatiated

somewhat largely, seeing he was indeed dear to me, and I have his kind

usage yet in fresh remembrance; for the piety of my mother, whom he

had seen in England, caused him to give me marks of the esteem he bore

to her memory: and his excellent endowments so affected me, that I was

eager to go to that meeting where I heard he was likely to be; nay, I

imagined I saw something in him so extraordinary valuable, that I bore

a very reverent respect to him, and the more, because difference of age

deprived me of a familiar conversation with him.

1669.

On the 20th of the First month called January, 1668-9, Francis Howgill,

after a sickness of nine days, died in the prison at Appleby, where he

had been kept above five years. During his sickness he was in perfect

good understanding, and often very fervent in prayer, uttering many

comfortable expressions, to the great refreshment of those about him.

He was often heard to say, ‘That he was content to die, and praised

God for the many sweet enjoyments and refreshments he had received in

that his prison-house-bed, whereon he lay, freely forgiving all who

had a hand in his restraint.’ And said he, ‘This was the place of my

first imprisonment for the truth, here at this town, and if it be the

place of my laying down the body, I am content.’ Several persons of

note, inhabitants of Appleby, as the mayor, and others, came to visit

him; and some of these praying that God might speak peace to his soul,

he returned, ‘he hath done it.’ About two days before his departure,

being attended by his wife, and several of his friends, he said to

them: ‘Friends, as to matter of words, ye must not expect much more

from me, neither is there any great need of it, or to speak of matters

of faith to you who are satisfied: only that ye remember my dear love

to all friends who inquire of me; for I ever loved friends well, or

any in whom truth appeared. Truly God will own his people, as he hath

ever hitherto done, and as we have daily witnessed; for no sooner had

they made the act of banishment, to the great suffering of many good

friends, but the Lord stirred up enemies against them, whereby the

violence of their hands was taken off. I say, again, God will own his

people, even all those that are faithful. And as for me, I am well,

and content to die. I am not at all afraid of death; but one thing was

of late in my heart, and that I intended to have written to George Fox

and others, even that which I have observed, viz. that this generation

passeth fast away; we see many good and precious friends within these

few years have been taken from us; and therefore friends had need to

watch, and be very faithful, that we may leave a good, and not a bad

savour, to the next succeeding generation; for we see that it is but a

little time that any of us have to stay here.’ A few hours before he

departed, some friends from other places being come to visit him, he

inquired about their welfare, and prayed fervently, with many heavenly

expressions, that the Lord by his mighty power, might preserve them out

of all such things as would spot and defile. His voice then, by reason

of his great weakness failed him, and a little after he recovering

some strength, said, ‘I have sought the way of the Lord from a child,

and lived innocently as among men; and if any inquire concerning my

latter end, let them know that I die in the faith in which I lived, and

suffered for.’ After these words, he spoke some others in prayer to

God, and so sweetly finished his days in peace with the Lord, in the

fiftieth year of his age.

He left a good name behind him amongst all who knew him.--Sometime

before his sickness, considering this mutable state, and finding in

himself some decay of nature, he made his will, in which, as his

love was very dear to his brethren, with whom he had laboured in the

ministry, so he gave to each of them a remembrance of his love; he left

also a legacy to his poor friends in those parts where he lived.

For although his moveable goods were forfeited to the king for ever,

yet the confiscation of his real estate was only for life; so that from

thence having something left, he could dispose of it by his will.

During his imprisonment, he neglected not to comfort and strengthen his

brethren by writing, effecting that by his pen, which he could not by

word of mouth: he also defended his doctrine against those who opposed

the same; and among others, he wrote a large treatise against oaths,

contradicting the opinion of those who account it lawful to swear under

the gospel.

About two years before his decease, he wrote an epistle of advice and

counsel as his last will and testament to his daughter Abigail, a

child whom he much loved, who was born in a time of deep exercises and

trouble, which nevertheless by the Lord’s goodness he was patiently

brought through; wherefore he named this child Abigail, signifying, the

father’s joy. In this testament he gave her instructions for the future

conduct of her life, the beginning whereof is thus:

‘Daughter Abigail, this is for thee to observe and keep, and

take heed unto all the days of thy life, for the regulating

thy life and conversation in this world, that thy life may be

happy, and thy end blessed, and God glorified by thee in thy

generation. I was not born to great possessions, or did inherit

great matters in this world; but the Lord hath always endowed me

with sufficiency and enough, and hath been as a tender father

unto me, because my heart trusted in him, and did love the way

of righteousness from a child. My counsel unto thee is, that

thou remember thy Creator in the days of thy youth, and fear

the Lord in thy youth, and learn to know him and serve him all

thy days: first seek the kingdom of God and the righteousness

thereof; it is not far from thee, it is within thee; it consists

in life and power, and it stands in righteousness, truth, and

equity, justice, mercy, long-suffering, patience, love, light,

and holiness, this is the being and centre thereof; therefore

seek not lo here, or lo there without thee, in this or that

outward observation, for many seek there and never find it; but

seek and thou shalt find, wait and thou shalt receive. If thou

inquire, in what must I seek? and what must I wait in? and how

must I seek? I inform thee, that thou must silence all thy own

thoughts, and thou must turn thy mind to that which is pure, and

holy, and good within thyself, and seek and wait in that in the

light of Jesus Christ, wherewith thou art enlightened, which

shows thee when thou dost evil, and checks and reproves; take

heed unto that, and it will show the evil motions and thoughts;

and as thou lovest it, it will subdue them, and preserve thee

for the time to come out of evil: for though thou be born into

the world a reasonable creature, yet thou must be born again,

and be made a new creature, or else thou canst not enter into

God’s kingdom; thou must know the seed of the kingdom in thyself,

of which thou must be born and formed again into God’s image.

I have told thee God hath sown it in thee, a grain of it, a

measure of it, a portion of it, a measure of light and truth, of

righteousness and holiness; keep in thy mind to that, and love

it, and thou wilt feel the heavenly Father working in thee, and

begetting thee to life through Jesus Christ that hath enlightened

thee, and thou wilt feel the power of the Lord strengthening

thee, in thy little, and making thee to grow in the immortal

seed of his kingdom, and outgrow and overgrow all evil, so that

thou wilt daily die to that, and have no pleasure in it, but

in the Lord, and in his goodness and virtue shed abroad in thy

heart, which thou wilt taste and feel within, and have joy and

comfort therein: love the Lord with thy heart and soul, even

him that made thee, and gave thee a being, and all things in

heaven and earth; and still wait for the knowledge of him in

thyself, he is not far from thee, but near unto thee, and unto

all that call upon him in an upright heart; and do thou inquire

of thy dear mother, she will inform thee, she knows him, and

the way to life and peace, and hearken to her instruction: God

is a spirit, of light, and life, and power, that searcheth the

heart, and shows thee when thou dost, or thinkest, or speakest

evil, and shows unto man or woman their thoughts. That which

shows the evil, is good, and that which shows a lie, is truth;

this is within, take heed to it, this is called God’s spirit in

the Scriptures, believe in it, love it, and it will quicken thy

heart to good, and it will subject the evil: here is thy teacher

near thee, love it, and if thou act contrary, it will condemn

thee; therefore take heed unto this spirit of truth, and it will

enlighten and enliven thee, and will open thy understanding,

and give thee to know what God is, and to do that which is good

and acceptable in his sight; this spirit never errs, but leads

out of all error into all truth. Be sober-minded in thy youth,

and wait on the Lord within, hearken unto him. God is light

immortal, life immortal, truth immortal, an everlasting eternal

Spirit: he speaks spiritually and invisibly within the hearts

and consciences of men and women: hear what he speaks, and obey

his voice, and thy soul shall live; fear to offend him, or sin

against him, for the wages of sin are death; therefore prize

his love in thy young and tender years, and do thou read the

Scriptures and Friends’ books, and take heed to what thou readest

to obey it, as far as thou understandest; and pray often unto

the Lord, that he will give thee his knowledge, and open thy

understanding in the things of his kingdom; search thy heart

often with the light of Christ in thee, manifest and bring thy

deeds to it, that they may be tried; and examine thyself how the

case stands betwixt the Lord and thee; and if thou seest thyself

wrong, humble thyself, and be sorry, and turn unto him, and he

will show thee mercy; and take heed for the time to come, that

thou run not into the same evil again; keep thy heart clean,

watch against the evil in thyself, in that which shows it;

therein there is power, and thereby thou hast power to overcome

all evil. And, dear child, mind not the pleasures of sin, which

are but for a moment, and the end is misery; but keep under and

cross thy will and affection, so thy mind will have no pleasure

in the evil, but in good; and thou wilt feel the immortal seed

springing up in thee, which God’s peace and love is to. O child!

these are great and weighty things, not to be slighted. Accompany

thyself always with them that fear the Lord, and fear and worship

him in spirit and truth, and lead a holy and blameless life and

conversation; deny them not, but love them, and suffer with them.

Take heed that thou follow not the hireling teachers, who preach

for gain and lucre, and abide not in Christ’s doctrine; believe

them not, heed them not, they do people no good; but thou

wilt see them thyself, they have an outside show of godliness

sometimes, but deny the power of God and true holiness; remember

I have told thee, who have had perfect knowledge of them. But be

sure that thou let nothing separate thy love from God and his

people; those are his people that keep his law, and obey Christ’s

voice, and lead a holy life, and they were ever hated and belied,

and persecuted, and evil-spoken of, always by bad and evil loose

people; these are God’s people, and his love, and peace, and

blessing is with them; do thou grow as a natural branch, (up

among them,) of the living vine, and continue all thy days in

obedience unto God’s will, and thou wilt feel joy and love in thy

heart, which above all things covet after, and thou shalt attain

and obtain everlasting peace, which the Lord grant unto thee,

according to the riches of his mercy and love, which endure for

ever and ever. Amen.

‘And now, Abigail, concerning thy well-being in this life, this

is my advice and counsel unto thee; love thy dear mother, and

ever obey her and honour her, and see thou grieve her not; be not

stubborn nor wilful, but submit unto her, and be as an obedient

child unto her, whose love and care hath been too great over

thee and thy sisters, which hath brought too much trouble upon

herself; learn in thy youth to read and write, and sew and knit,

and all points of good labour that belong to a maid, and flee

idleness and sloth, that nourisheth sin; and as thou growest up

in years, labour in the affairs of the country, and beware of

pride, and riotousness, and curiosity, but be well content with

such apparel as thy mother will permit thee, that thou mayest be

a good example unto others. Be not wanton, nor wild, nor light,

but temperate, moderate, and chaste, and not forward in words,

nor speech, but swift to hear, slow to speak; and do thou always

live with thy mother, and be a help unto her, and cherish her in

her old age and latter years, that she may be comforted in thee,

and her soul may bless thee. Love thy sisters, and be always

courteous to them and thy brother, encourage one another in good:

and if thou live to be a woman of perfect years, keep thyself

unspotted, and let not thy mind out after sports nor pastimes,

the end of all those is sorrow: neither after young men; if thou

have a desire to marry, do not thou seek a husband, but let a

husband seek thee; and if thou live in God’s fear, and an honest

life and virtuous, them that fear God will seek unto thee; let

not thy affections out unto every one that proffers love, but

be considerate, and above all things, choose one, (if thou dost

marry,) that loves and fears the Lord, whose conversation and

manner, and course of life, thou knowest well, before thou give

consent. Be discreet and wise, hide nothing from thy mother,

and she will advise thee, no doubt, for thy good; and if she be

living, marry not without her consent: and if thou join to a

husband, be sure thou love him in thy heart, and be obedient unto

him, and honour him among all, so will his heart be more to thee,

and his love increase; grieve him not, but be gentle, and easy

to be intreated, and mind thy own business; and if the Lord give

thee children, bring them up in God’s fear, and good exercise,

and keep them in subjection unto thee, and be an example of

virtue and holiness unto them, that the Lord’s blessing thou

mayest feel in youth and in age, and all thy life long. O

Abigail! remember these things, keep in mind these things, read

often this writing over, get it copied over, and lay up my words

in thy heart, and do them, so wilt thou be happy in this life,

and in the life to come: these things I give thee in charge to

observe, as my mind and will, and counsel unalterable unto thee,

as witness hereof I have set my hand,

Thy dear father,

FRANCIS HOWGILL.’

The 26th of the 5th Month, 1666.

In the beginning of this year the members of this society, held a

general Yearly-meeting at London, which since that time, hath been used

to be held there annually, in the week called Whitsun-week,[39] because

at that time of the year it is commonly best travelling, &c. Several

are deputed from all places to this meeting, and what concerns the

church in general, is there treated on.

[39] It hath since been fixed to be held on the Second-day

immediately following the third First-day in the 5th month.

Persecution for religion seemed now to be at a stand, which displeased

some of the most rigid sort of churchmen, which we not only have

already, but may again in due place demonstrate.

About this time, as I take it, a certain bishop said occasionally, that

the Quakers by their unlimited freedom, increased much, and therefore

it was very needful to take care of them, seeing they often had much

greater assemblies than the national church; ‘For,’ said he, ‘at such a

time I preached myself, and there were but a few hearers, when at the

same time the Quakers’ meeting just by was crowded full;’ and thereupon

he desired them to consider whether it was not high time to stop these

sectaries? After he had set forth his matter at large, another lord

then present among others, said, that indeed it seemed that the lord

bishop had spoken what was very reasonable, that the sectaries had

often more hearers than the national church-preachers, and that it

was not strange to him that it displeased him, since he took so much

upon himself: ‘For,’ said he, ‘his lordship observed, that he preached

himself; and the professed Quakers, who had such great assemblies,

preached Christ Jesus, and therefore no wonder that they had the more

hearers.’ This was such a witty turn upon the bishop, as no doubt

made him so sensible as not to think fit to enter upon the debate in

a doubtful dispute, for it is observable, this lord’s turn upon the

bishop was chiefly to stop him from promoting persecution.

This spring G. Fox travelling to York, went through several other

places in the North of England; and although he came near to his old

enemy, colonel Kirby, who had a fit of the gout, and had threatened

him, yet he passed on unmolested. So he went to Liverpool, whence

he, with some of his friends, passed over for Ireland: among others,

were Thomas Briggs and John Stubbs; and being arrived at Dublin, he

was kindly received by his friends; and journeying into the country,

he met with no small opposition from the Papists, of whom there are

many there. Being come to a certain place, he challenged the jesuits,

priests, and monks, to try whether their god, which they make of

a wafer, be an immortal god, but they could not be brought to it;

wherefore he said, they were worse than Baal’s priests, for Baal’s

priests tried their god. Then he went to Cork, where they had knowledge

of his coming, and intended to take him prisoner; for the Quakers in

Ireland were many years sharply persecuted, as their brethren were in

England, of which to mention all circumstances it would make a very

large treatise. At this time there were many prisoners at Cork, among

whom was Samuel Thornton, with whom I was well acquainted, who being

met with his friends in a chamber one First-day, the officer Quinnal

came and shut the door of the room, and locked them in, to the number

of eighty persons, and carried the key to the mayor, Matthew Dean, who

gave order that there should neither victuals nor drink be carried to

them, and they could only get what was pulled up with ropes through the

grate, or thrown in through a hole: under this chamber the soldiers

were ordered to keep guard, that none might get away, and they made so

great a smoke, that many of the prisoners were sick, among whom were

some weakly old people, and some women with child, and nurses, who

were almost stifled; and complaint thereof being made to the mayor,

he answered in a scoffing manner, ‘They are all brethren and sisters,

let them lie upon one another; and if they are stifled it is their own

fault.’ Thus they were kept twenty-four hours, and afterwards some of

them made prisoners.

Solomon Eccles, whom I also knew very well, was this year in prison

at Gallaway in Ireland, where he was put, by a strange accident. He

was an extraordinary zealous man, and what he judged evil he warmly

opposed, even to the hazard of his life. This zeal led him to perform

a strange action in a chapel of the Papists without the town; for he

went naked above his waist, with a chafing-dish of coals and burning

brimstone on his head, and entered the chapel when all the people were

on their knees to pray to their idol, and spoke as followeth: ‘Wo to

these idolatrous worshippers! God hath sent me this day to warn you,

and to show you what will be your portion except you repent.’ Which

when he had done, he went away to the town, where he was presently made

a prisoner. What the benefit of this strange action might be, I leave.

Amongst the martyrs of the reformed, we find some instances of persons

zealous to a strange degree, as of William Gardiner at Lisbon, and

Bertrand le Blas at Tournay, whose actions were not less remarkable;

for this last, his snatching the host from the priest in their

church as they were at mass, was certainly a bold attempt, and not

praiseworthy, if it was only an act of human contrivance; but I shall

leave the judgment thereof unto God, as I account it safest, and the

rather, because under the sharpest punishment they could inflict, they

seemed not to shrink, but rather to be strengthened. However so sharp

a trial did not fall to Eccles’s portion, and I think it safer not to

judge hastily of this uncommon performance. He was, to my knowledge,

a bold and undaunted man, and before this action in the chapel, as

above, he did something of a like nature at London at the fair-time,

amongst the plays, where he suffered much by the coachmen whipping him

grievously on his naked back; but that could not lay his fervent zeal,

which was kindled not only against the immodest and ungodly carriage

of the pretended fools, but also against those other vanities there

used. To what height his zeal carried him, the following instance will

show: he who had been a member of the church of England, and then went

to the Presbyterians, and afterwards among the Independents, and after

that was a Baptist, had been an eminent musician, so that by his art

he could get near 150_l._ a-year; but at last being a Quaker, he could

not follow for conscience-sake, what he now called his Babylonish trade

of music: wherefore he learned to make clothes to get his living by,

and sold his musical books and instruments; but, as he declared, he had

no peace in his conscience; for observing them to be instruments of

vanity, he judged they ought to be destroyed, and therefore bought them

again, although they were worth above 20_l._ and carried them, viz.

virginals, fiddles, &c. to Tower-hill, where laying them together, he

set fire to them; but when some who were by, endeavoured to hinder him,

and to get one of the virginals away, he stamped upon it with his foot,

and would not rest until he had destroyed it; and after that he said,

he found peace in his conscience, having made an offering of that which

he once entirely loved, and in the use of which he was educated; for

not only his father and grandfather, but his grandfather’s father had

been musicians, and he himself had the name of an eminent music-master.

Another account we have of his strange zeal: when he saw how the

Quakers were belied by William Burnet, Jeremy Ives, and Matthew Kiffin,

teachers amongst the Baptists, as if they believed not in Christ nor

the resurrection, he challenged all the teachers, and priests, and

jesuits, openly in a book which he printed, to come to a proof with

him, who were the true worshippers; first, to fast seven days and seven

nights, and neither to eat nor drink; and then the next seven days

not to sleep day nor night; but we may well think that none were to

be found to enter the lists with him, nor to put themselves on such a

test; and although some reckoned him out of his wits, yet he was not,

for I remember the time very well, and had many an opportunity both to

see and to hear him speak.

I now return to G. Fox at Cork in Ireland, where they intended to take

him, nevertheless they let him go unmolested, although he rode through

the market, by the mayor’s door, who not only saw him, but said, ‘There

goes G. Fox,’ and yet he let him pass quietly. After he had travelled

through many places in Ireland, he came again to Dublin, from whence

he returned to England, and coming into Gloucestershire, he heard at

Nailsworth of a report which had been spread abroad in the country,

that he was turned Presbyterian, and they had prepared a pulpit for him

in the open yard, where he was to preach. G. Fox hearing this, thought

it very strange, whereupon he went to the place spoken of, where he

indeed found a pulpit; but the case was this: a certain Presbyterian

preacher, named John Fox, who went preaching about the country, was

to preach there, and it seems some had changed his name from John to

George, whereupon it was reported that he was turned from being a

Quaker, to be a Presbyterian: this begat so great a curiosity in the

people, that many went thither to hear this Quaker turned Presbyterian;

so this John Fox came to have a great auditory of several hundreds, who

would not have went a foot to have heard him, had they known it. Now

some hundreds of them hearing afterwards that the real G. Fox was not

far off at a meeting, they went thither and were sober and attentive;

where they were by him directed to the grace of God in themselves,

which would teach them and bring them salvation. And when the meeting

was over, some of the people said, they liked George Fox the Quaker’s

preaching, better than G. F. the Presbyterian. Not long after this John

Fox was complained of in the house of commons, for having a tumultuous

meeting, in which treasonable words were spoken. This John Fox had

formerly been priest of Marshfield in Gloucestershire, and being put

out of that place, was afterwards permitted by a common-prayer priest

to preach sometimes in his steeple-house; at length this Presbyterian

priest presuming too far upon the parish priest’s former grant, began

to be more bold than welcome, and would have preached there whether

the priest would or not; which caused a great bustle and contest

between the two priests, and their hearers on either side, in which the

common-prayer book was cut to pieces, and it is said some treasonable

words were then spoken, by some of the followers of this John Fox;

which case was quickly put into the newspapers, and some malicious

Presbyterians caused it to be so worded as if it had proceeded from G.

F. the Quaker, but some members of the house of commons certified it

under their hands, that it was John Fox, formerly priest of Marshfield,

who was complained of to be the ringleader of that unlawful assembly.

After this G. F. travelled to Bristol, where he met with Margaret Fell,

then a widow, who came thither to visit her daughter Yeomans. He had

before this intimated to her his affection, and proposed to take her in

marriage at a suitable time; but though he had a sense in himself, it

was of the Lord, yet he did not at first find a freedom to accomplish

the same, but all obstructions being now removed, he so proposed the

matter, that if she was willing to give her consent, that the same

should be accomplished, she might first send for her children; who

being come, he asked both her daughters and their husbands, whether

they had any thing against his taking their mother to be his wife?

And they all severally expressed their satisfaction therein. Then he

asked Margaret, whether she had performed her husband’s will? And the

children, whether, if their mother married, they should lose by it? The

children said, she had answered it to them, and desired him to speak no

more of that. So observing they were all well satisfied, he proceeded

in his marriage, and took Margaret Fell to wife in a public meeting of

friends in Bristol. She was a woman of a noble endowment, and this I

know not only by her writings, but I have also heard her preach an hour

together, delivering her matter compactly and orderly.

G. F. being married, he stayed with his wife about a week in Bristol,

and then they went together to Oldstone, and there taking leave of each

other, they parted, she went homeward into the north, and he travelled

through Wiltshire, Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Bucks, and so to London: for

although now he had a wife, yet he did not neglect his care towards the

churches, all the nation over, in the gift which he had received of

God, both in word and writing to their edification, and among the rest

he had a special regard, that the poor might be taken care of, to which

end he wrote an epistle in London, to this effect, that poor children

should be put forth apprentices to trades, whereby in time, they might

help their aged parents, and enable them to bring up their families,

and maintain themselves handsomely.

1670.

G. Fox stayed not long in London; but the year 1670 being now come,

he travelled through Hertfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Huntingdonshire,

and Leicestershire, where he expected to have met with his wife; for

he had wrote her word, if she found it convenient, to meet him there;

but instead thereof he understood she was hauled out of her house

and carried to Lancaster prison, upon the old premunire, which was

executed upon her five years before, from which she was discharged by

order of the king and council the last year. Wherefore, after he had

visited friends in those counties, he returned to London, where he

found two of his wife’s daughters, whom he hastened to go to the king,

to acquaint him how their mother was dealt with, which they did, but

met with much difficulty; yet they diligently attended the same, as

it behoved them for their mother, who was a mother or overseer of the

church also, and therefore of the greater concern; but at last through

assiduous application, they got to the speech of the king, to whom one

of them said, that instead of their waiting upon him to return him

thanks for the discharge of their mother, they were now necessitated

to make complaint of their mother’s being cast into prison a second

time! Whereupon the king gave command to sir John Otway, to write to

the sheriff of Lancashire, to set her at liberty, which letter G. F.

accordingly hastened his daughters with into the country.

* * * * *

The parliament now sitting, made a law, entitled, An Act to prevent and

suppress seditious conventicles, which is as follows:

For providing further and more speedy remedies against the

growing and dangerous practices of seditious sectaries, and other

disloyal persons, who under pretence of tender consciences,

have or may at their meetings contrive insurrections, (as

late experience hath shown,) (2) Be it enacted by the king’s

most excellent majesty, by and with the advice and consent of

the lords spiritual and temporal, and commons in this present

parliament assembled, and by authority of the same, that if any

person of the age of sixteen years or upwards, being a subject of

this realm, at any time after the tenth day of May next, shall be

present at any assembly, conventicle, or meeting, under colour

or pretence of an exercise of religion, in other manner than

according to the liturgy and practice of the church of England,

in any place within the kingdom of England, dominion of Wales,

or town of Berwick-upon-Tweed, at which conventicle, meeting, or

assembly, there shall be five persons or more assembled together,

over and besides those of the same household, if it be in a house

where there is a family inhabiting; or if it be in a house,

field, or place where there is no family inhabiting; then where

any five persons or more, are so assembled, as aforesaid, it

shall and may be lawful to and for any one or more justices of

the peace of the county, limit, division, corporation or liberty,

wherein the offence aforesaid shall be committed, or for the

chief magistrate of the place where the offence aforesaid shall

be committed; and he and they are hereby required and enjoined

upon proof to him or them respectively made of such offence,

either by confession of the party, or oath of two witnesses;

(3) (which oath the said justice and justices of the peace, and

chief magistrate respectively, are hereby empowered and required

to administer,) or be notorious evidence and circumstance of the

fact, to make a record of every such offence under his or their

hands and seals respectively: which record so made, as aforesaid,

shall to all intents and purposes be in law taken and adjudged

to be a full and perfect conviction of every such offender for

such offence: and thereupon the said justice, justices, and chief

magistrate respectively, shall impose on every such offender

so convicted, as aforesaid, a fine of five shillings for such

first offence: which record and conviction shall be certified

by the said justice, justices, or chief magistrate, at the next

quarter-sessions of the peace, for the county or place where the

offence was committed.

II. And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, that

if such offender so convicted, as aforesaid, shall at any time

again commit the like offence or offences, contrary to this act,

and be thereof in manner aforesaid convicted, then such offender

so convict of such like offence or offences shall for every such

offence incur the penalty of ten shillings; (2) which fine and

fines, for the first and every other offence, shall be levied by

distress and sale of the offender’s goods and chattels; or in

case of the poverty of such offender, upon the goods and chattels

of any other person or persons who shall be then convicted in

manner aforesaid of the like offence at the same conventicle, at

the discretion of the said justice, justices or chief magistrate

respectively, so as the sum to be levied on any one person in

case of the poverty of other offenders, amount not in the whole

to above the sum of ten pounds, upon occasion of any one meeting,

as aforesaid; (3) and every constable, headborough, tithingman,

churchwardens, and overseers of the poor respectively, are hereby

authorized and required to levy the same accordingly, having

first received a warrant under the hands and seals of the said

justice, justices, or chief magistrate respectively, so to do;

(4) the said monies so to be levied, to be forthwith delivered

the same justice, justices, or chief magistrate, and by him or

them to be distributed, the one third part thereof to the use

of the king’s majesty, his heirs and successors, to be paid to

the high sheriff of the county for the time being, in manner

following; that is to say, the justice or justices of peace shall

pay the same into the court of the respective quarter-sessions,

which said court shall deliver the same to the sheriff, and make

a memorial on record of the payment and delivery thereof, which

said memorial shall be a sufficient and final discharge to the

said justice and justices, and a charge to the sheriff, which

said discharge and charge shall be certified into the exchequer

together, and not one without the other: and no justice shall or

may be questioned or accountable for the same in the exchequer or

elsewhere, than in quarter-sessions; another third part thereof

to and for the use of the poor of the parish where such offence

shall be committed; and the other third part thereof to the

informer and informers and to such person and persons as the said

justice, justices or chief magistrate respectively shall appoint,

having regard to their diligence and industry in the discovery,

dispersing and punishing of the said conventicles.

III. And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, that

every person who shall take upon him to preach or teach in any

such meeting, assembly or conventicle, and shall thereof be

convicted, as aforesaid, shall forfeit for every such first

offence the sum of twenty pounds, to be levied in manner

aforesaid upon his goods and chattels; (2) and if the said

preacher or teacher so convicted, be a stranger, and his name and

habitation not known, or is fled, and cannot be found, or in the

judgment of the justice, justices or chief magistrate before whom

he shall be convicted, shall be thought unable to pay the same,

the said justice, justices, or chief magistrate respectively, are

hereby empowered and required to levy the same by warrant, as

aforesaid, upon the goods and chattels of any such persons who

shall be present at the same conventicle; any thing in this or

any other act, law, or statute to the contrary notwithstanding;

and the money so levied, to be disposed of in manner aforesaid:

(3) and if such offender so convicted as aforesaid, shall at any

time again commit the like offence or offences contrary to this

act, and be thereof convicted in manner aforesaid, then such

offender so convicted of such like offence or offences, shall

for every such offence, incur the penalty of forty pounds, to be

levied and disposed, as aforesaid.

IV. And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, that

every person who shall wittingly and willingly suffer any such

conventicle, meeting, or unlawful assembly aforesaid, to be held

in his or her house, outhouse, barn, yard, or backside, and be

convicted thereof in manner aforesaid, shall forfeit the sum

of twenty pounds, to be levied in manner aforesaid, upon his

or her goods and chattels; or in case of his or her poverty or

inability, as aforesaid, upon the goods and chattels of such

persons who shall be convicted in manner aforesaid, of being

present at the same conventicle; and the money so levied, to be

disposed of in manner aforesaid.

V. Provided always, and be it enacted by the authority aforesaid,

that no person shall by any clause of this act be liable to pay

above ten pounds for any one meeting, in regard of the poverty of

any other person or persons.

VI. Provided also, and be it further enacted, that in all cases

of this act, where the penalty or sum charged upon any offender

exceeds the sum of ten shillings, and such offender shall find

himself aggrieved, it shall and may be lawful for him within

one week after the said penalty or money charged shall be paid

or levied, to appeal in writing from the person or persons

convicting, to the judgment of the justices of the peace in their

next quarter-sessions, (2) to whom the justice or justices of the

peace, chief magistrate, or alderman, that first convicted such

offender, shall return the money levied upon the appellant, and

shall certify under his and their hands and seals the evidence

upon which the conviction passed, with the whole record thereof,

and the said appeal: (3) whereupon such offender may plead and

make defence, and have his trial by a jury thereupon: (4) and

in case such appellant shall not prosecute with effect, or if

upon such trial he shall not be acquitted, or judgment pass not

for him upon his said appeal, the said justices at the sessions

shall give treble costs against such offender for his unjust

appeal: (5) And no other court whatsoever shall intermeddle with

any cause or causes of appeal upon this act, but they shall be

finally determined in the quarter-sessions only.

VII. Provided always, and be it further enacted, that upon the

delivery of such appeal, as aforesaid, the person or persons

appellant shall enter before the person or persons convicting,

into recognizance, to prosecute the said appeal with effect: (2)

which said recognizance the person or persons so convicting is

hereby empowered to take, and required to certify the same to the

next quarter-sessions: (3) and in case no such recognizance be

entered into, the said appeal to be null and void.

VIII. Provided always, that every such appeal shall be left with

the person or persons so convicting, as aforesaid, at the time of

the making thereof.

The History of the Rise, Increase, and Progress of the Christian People Called Quakers Intermixed with Several Remarkable Occurrencs. · 第 80 / 147 题