Here I interrupt with a groan--"Can't we go later?"

"No," says SKURRIE, sternly. "Impossible. You'll upset all the

calculations if you do."

JANE says, meekly, that when one is travelling, and going to bed early,

it is not so difficult to get up very early, and, for her part, she

knows she shall be awake all night. Ah! so shall I, I feel, and already

the journey begins to weigh heavily on me, and I do not bless SKURRIE

and his plan. "But," I say aloud, knowing he has done it all for the

best, and that I cannot now recede, "go on."

He does so, at railroad pace:--"Heidelberg _dep_. 6. Mannheim _arr_.

7.5, _dep_. 7.15. Mayence _arr_. 8.22, in time for boat down the Rhine

8.55. Cologne _arr_. 4.30. And there you are."

"Yes," I rejoin, rather liking the idea of Cologne, "there we are--and

then?"

"Well, you'll have a longish morning at Cologne; rest, see Cathedral,

breakfast," and here he refers to his notes, "Cologne _dep_. 1.13 P.M.,

and Antwerp _arr_. 6.34."

"Change anywhere?" I inquire, helplessly. "Yes," he answers,

meditatively. "At this moment I forget where, but you've got examination

of baggage on the Belgian frontier, and you have two changes, I think.

However, it's all easy enough."

"I'm glad of that," I say, trying to cheer up a bit, only somehow I am

depressed: and Cousin JANE isn't much better, though she tries to put

everything in the pleasantest possible light, and remarks that at all

events "the travelling will soon be over."

SKURRIE continues reading off his paper and comparing the details with

my notes, "Sunday--Antwerp _dep_. 6.34 P.M. Rosendael _arr_.

7.45--yes--then Rosendael _dep_. 8.44, and catch the 10.10 P.M. boat at

Flushing. Queenborough _arr_. 5.50, fresh as a lark, and up to town by

7.55."

"But we don't want to go up to town, we want to go to Ramsgate."

"Ha!" he says slowly, giving this idea as just sprung upon him his full

consideration. "Ha!--let me see----" Then, as if by inspiration, he

continues quickly--"sacrifice your London tickets, book luggage for

Flushing, only then at Flushing re-book it for Queenborough, and once

you're there you catch an early train to Ramsgate, and you'll be there

nearly as soon as you would have arrived in London. Train just off. Wish

you _bon voyage_."

I thank him for all his trouble, and ask, with some astonishment, if he

is not going to accompany us?

"Can't--wish I could," returns SKURRIE, "but I've got to go off to

Petersburgh by night mail. Business. Should have been delighted to have

looked after you and seen you through, but you've got it all down and

can't make any mistake. _Au plaisir!_"

And he is off. So are we.

Oh, this journey!! Everything changes. My health, the scenery, the

weather, all becoming worse and worse. Poor Cousin JANE, too.

Oh, the changes of carriage! The rushing about from platform to

platform, carrying that confounded bag, and sticks, and umbrellas, and

small things, of which JANE--poor JANE!--has her share, and, but for her

sticking to every basket and package, I should, in despair, have

surrendered to chance, left them behind me somewhere, and should have

never seen them again. All aches and pains, and weariness! At last at

Bale, rattled over stones and bridge in a jolting omnibus, through

pouring rain to the hotel of "The Three Kings."

Our treatment in the _salle-a-manger_ of that Monarchical Hostelrie is

enough to make the most loyal turn republican. A willing head-waiter

with insubordinate assistants--and we are miserable.

Off early to Heidelberg. Delighted, at all events, to bid farewell to

the worthy Monarchs. This trip seemed to invigorate us, and if civility,

polite attention, good rooms, and an excellent _cuisine_ could make any

invalid temporarily better, then our short stay at the Prinz Karl

Hotel--a really perfectly managed establishment--ought to have revived

us both considerably. And so it did. A lovely drive to the heights among

the pine woods and in the purest air went for something, but alas the

knowledge that we had to rise at 5 A.M., to be off by six--it turned out

to be a 6.30 train--drove slumber from our eyes, and only by means of a

cold bath, the first thing on tumbling out of bed, could I brace myself

for the effort. Then on we went, taking SKURRIE'S pre-arranged tour.

Let the remainder be a blank.

When abroad I had bought a French one-volume novel which I had seen

praised in the _Figaro_. I will not give its name, nor that of its

author. If it indeed portrays persons really living in Paris, and if

these persons are not wholly exceptional (but, if so, why this novel,

which implies the contrary and denounces them?) then is the latest state

of Republican Paris worse than its former state in the days of the

_degringolade_ of the Empire, and Paris must undergo a fearful purgation

before she will once again possess _mens sana in corpore sano_. I read

this disgusting novel half-way through until its meaning became quite

clear to me, and then I proceeded by leaps and bounds, landing on dry

places and skipping over the filth in order to see how the author worked

out a moral and punished his infamous scoundrel of a chief personage.

No. Moral there was none, except an eloquent appeal to Paris to rise and

crush these reptiles and their brood. On the wretched night when

feverish, ill, and sleepless, I lay miserably in the saloon of the

Flemish steamer crossing to Queenborough, I opened the porthole above me

and threw this infernal book into the sea. After this I bore the

sufferings of that night with a lighter heart.

* * * * *

Suffice it that I arrived at home--and how glad I was to get

there--broken down, prostrate and only fit for bed----where with

railways running round and round my head, steamboats dashing and

thumping about my brain, the shrieks of German and Flemish porters

ringing in my ears, SKURRIE always forcing me to travel on, on, on,

against my will, I remained for about three weeks.

_Advice gratis to all Drinkers of Waters_.--"The story shows," as the

Moral to the fables of AESOP used to put it, that when you have finished

your cure, make straight by the easiest stages for the seaside at

home. Avoid all exertion: and ask your medical man before leaving to

tell you exactly what to eat, drink, and avoid, for the next three weeks

at least after the completion of your cure.

* * * * *

While ill, but when beginning to crave for some amusement or

distraction, I asked that my dear old BOZ'S _Sketches_ should be read to

me, to which in years gone by I had been indebted for many a hearty

laugh. Alas! what a disappointment! Except for a little descriptive bit

here and there, the fun of these _Sketches_ sounded as wearisome and

old-fashioned as the humours of the now forgotten "Adelphi screamers" in

which Messrs. WRIGHT and PAUL BEDFORD used to perform, and at which, as

a boy, I used to scream with delight, when the strong-minded mistress of

the house, speaking while the comic servant was laying the cloth for

dinner, would say of her husband, "When I see him I'll give him----"

"Pepper," says the comic servant, accidentally placing that condiment on

the table. "He shan't," resumes the irate lady, "come over me with

any----" "Butter," interrupts the comic servant, quite unconsciously, of

course, as he deposits a pat of Dorset on the table. And so on. Later

on, I tried THACKERAY'S _Esmond_. How tedious, how involved, and full of

repetitions! It is enlivened here and there by the introduction of such

real characters as _Dick Steele_, _Lord Mohun_, _Dean Atterbury_, and

others, and by the mysterious melodramatic appearances and

disappearances of _Father Holt_, a typical Jesuit of the "penny

dreadful" style of literature. But the work had lost whatever charm it

ever possessed for me, and, indeed, I had always considered it an

over-rated book, not by any means to be compared with _Vanity Fair_,

_Pendennis_, or even with _Barry Lyndon_, which last is repulsively

clever.

* * * * *

Then I asked for a book that I never yet could get through, and to which

I thought that now, with leisure and a craving for distraction, I might

take a liking. This was _Little Dorrit_. I tried hard, but it made my

head ache even more than _Esmond_ had done, and I laid it down, utterly

unable to comprehend the mystery which takes such an amount of dreary,

broken-up, tedious dialogue in the closing chapters to unravel.

* * * * *

I took down WASHINGTON IRVING'S _Sketch-book_, and read it with

delight. Fresh as ever! It did me good. So did CHARLES LAMB'S Essays.

And then guess what moved me to laughter, to tears, and to real

heartfelt gratitude that we should have had a writer who could leave us

such an immortal work? What? It is a gem. It is very small, but to my

mind, and not excepting any one of all he ever wrote, the most precious

in every way for its true humour, for its natural pathos, and for its

large-hearted Christian teaching, is _The Christmas Carol_, by CHARLES

DICKENS. Had this been his only book, it would have sufficed for his

imperishable fame.

* * * * *

And then what made me chuckle and laugh? Why, THACKERAY'S _Sultan Stork_,

which, somehow or other, I never remembered having read before this time

of convalescent leisure. It is THACKERAY in his most frolicsome humour,

and, therefore, THACKERAY at his best.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 93, October 15th 1887 · 第 9 / 27 题