NOTE 13.

Which was probably not of French origin. Thomas-a-Kempis, Gerson, and

others, have had the credit of it; but the point is still doubtful.

When I say that it was _extensively_ diffused, naturally I mean so far

as it was possible before the invention of printing. One generation

after Agincourt this invention was beginning to move, after which--that

is, in two generations--the multiplication of copies, and even of

separate editions and separate translations, ran beyond all power of

registration. It is one amongst the wonders of the world; and the

reason I have formerly explained. Froissart belongs to the courts of

England and of Burgundy much more than to that of France.

Theological Essays and Other Papers — Volume 2 · 第 67 / 69 题