NOTE 8.

'_The two brilliant poets._' As regards Horace, it is scarcely worth

while to direct the reader's attention upon inconsistency of this

imaginary defiance to philosophic authority with his profession

elsewhere of allegiance to Epicurus; for had it even been possible to

direct the poet's own attention upon it, the same spirit of frank

simplicity which has converted his very cowardice, his unmitigated

cowardice (_relicta non bene parmula_), into one of those amiable and

winning frailties which, once having come to know it, on no account

could we consent to forego--would have reconciled us all by some

inimitable picturesqueness of candor to inconsistency the most shocking

as to the fulfilment of some great moral obligation; just as from the

brute restiveness of a word (Equotuticum), that positively would not

come into the harness of hexameter verse, he has extracted a gay,

laughing _alias_ (viz., '_versu quod dicere non est_'); a pleasantry

which is nowhere so well paralleled as by Southey's on the name of

Admiral Tchichakoff:--

'A name which you all must know very well,

Which nobody can speak, and nobody can spell.'

Vain would it be to fasten any blame upon a poet armed with such

heaven-born playfulness that upon a verbal defect he raises a triumph

of art, and upon a personal defect raises a perpetual memento of smiling

and affectionate forgiveness. We 'condone' his cowardice, to use

language of Doctors' Commons, many times over, before we know whether

he would have cared for our condonation; and protest our unanimous

belief, that, if he did run away from battle, he ran no faster than

a gentleman ought to run. In fact, his character would have wanted its

amiable unity had he _not_ been a coward, or had he _not_ been a rake.

Vain were it to level reproaches at _him_, for whom all reproaches

become only occasions of further and surplus honor. But, in fact, for

any serious purposes of Horace, philosophy was not wanted. Some slight

pretence of that kind served to throw a shade of pensiveness over his

convivial revels, and thus to rescue them from the taint of plebeian

grossness. So far, and no farther, a slight coloring of philosophy was

needed for his moral musings. But Pope's case is different. The moral

breathings of Horace are natural exhalations rising spontaneously from

the heart under the ordinary gleams of chance and change in the human

things that lay around him. But Pope is more ambitious. He is not

content with _borrowing_ from philosophy the grace of a passing sanction

or countersign, but undertakes to _lend_ her a systematic coherency

of development, and sometimes even a fundamental basis. In his

'Essay on Man,' his morals connect themselves with metaphysics. The

metaphysics had been gathered together in his chance eclectic rambles

amongst books of philosophy, such as Montaigne, Charron, and latterly

amongst the fossil rubbish and _debris_ of Bayle's Dictionary. Much

also had been suggested to his piercing intellect in conversation,

especially with Lord Bolingbroke; but not so exclusively by any means

with _him_ as the calumniators of Pope would have us suppose. Adopt

he did from all quarters, but Pope was not the man servilely to beg

or to steal. It was indispensable to his own comfort that he should

at least understand the meaning of what he took from others, though

seldom indeed he understood its wider relations, or pursued its ultimate

consequences. Hence came anguish and horror upon Pope in his latter

days, such as rarely can have visited any but the deathbed of some

memorable criminal. To have rejected the _verba magistri_ might seem

well, it might look promising, as all _real_ freedom is promising, for

the interests of truth; but he forgot that, in rejecting the master,

he had also rejected the doctrine--the guiding principle--the unity

of direction secured for the inquirer by the master's particular system

with its deep internal cohesion. Coming upon his own distracted choice

of principles from opposite angles and lines of direction, he found

that what once and under one aspect had seemed to him a guiding light,

and one of the buoys for narrowing the uncertainties of a difficult

navigation, absolutely under another aspect, differently approached

and differently associated, did the treacherous office of a _spanselled_

horse, as in past days upon the Cornish and the South Irish coast it

was employed--expressly for showing false signals, and leading right

amongst breakers. That _hortus siccus_ of pet notions, which had won

Pope's fancy in their insulated and separate existence, when brought

together as parts and elements of the same system in the elaborate and

haughty 'Essay on Man,' absolutely refused to cohere. No doctoring,

no darning, could disguise their essential inter-repulsion. Dismal

rents, chasms, hiatuses, gaped and grinned in a theory whose very

office and arrogant pretension had been to harmonize the dislocated

face of nature, and to do _that_ in the way of justification for God

which God had forgotten to do for himself. How if an enemy should come,

and fill up these ugly chasms with some poisonous fungus of a nature

to spread the dry rot through the main timbers of the vessel? And, in

fact, such an enemy _did_ come. This enemy spread dismay through Pope's

heart. Pope found himself suddenly shown up as an anti-social monster,

as an incendiary, as a disorganizer of man's most aspiring hopes. 'O

Heavens! What is to be done? what _can_ be done?' he cried out. 'When

I wrote that passage, which now seems so wicked, certainly I meant

something very good; or, if I didn't, at any rate I meant to mean it.'

The case was singular; if no friend of the author's could offer a

decent account of its meaning, to a certainty the author could _not_.

Luckily, however, there are two ways of filling up chasms; and

Warburton, who had reasons best known to himself for cultivating Pope's

favor, besides considerable practice during his youth in a special

pleader's office, took the desperate case in hand. He caulked the

chasms with philosophic oakum, he 'payed' them with dialectic pitch,

he sheathed them with copper and brass by means of audacious dogmatism

and insolent quibbles, until the enemy seemed to have been silenced,

and the vessel righted so far as to float. The result, however, as a

permanent result, was this--that the demurs which had once been raised

(however feebly pressed) against the poem, considered in the light of

a system compatible with religion, settled upon it permanently as a

sullen cloud of suspicion that a century has not availed to dissipate.

Theological Essays and Other Papers — Volume 2 · 第 62 / 69 题