NOTE 6.

Upon this principle I doubt not that we should interpret the sayings

attributed to the seven wise men of Greece. If we regard them as

insulated aphorisms, they strike us all as mere impertinences; for by

what right is some one prudential admonition separarately illuminated

and left as a solemn legacy to all posterity in slight of others equally

cogent? For instance, _Meden agan_--nothing in excess--is a maxim not

to be neglected, but still not entitled to the exclusive homage which

is implied in its present acceptation. The mistake, meantime, I believe

to be, not in the Grecian pleiad of sages, but in ourselves, who have

falsely apprehended them. The man, for instance (Bias was it, or who?),

who left me this old saw about excess, did not mean to bias me in favor

of that one moral caution; this would have argued a craze in favor of

one element amongst many. What he meant was, to indicate the _radix_

out of which his particular system was expanded. It was the key-note

out of which, under the laws of thorough-bass, were generated the whole

chord and its affinities. Whilst the whole evolution of the system was

in lively remembrance, there needed no more than this short-hand memento

for recalling it. But now, when the lapse of time has left the little

maxim stranded on a shore of wrecks, naturally it happens that what

was in old days the keystone of an arch has come to be compounded with

its superfluous rubbish.

Theological Essays and Other Papers — Volume 2 · 第 60 / 69 题