CHAPTER IV

MODERN CHINA

The position of China among the nations of the world is quite peculiar,

because in population and potential strength China is the greatest

nation in the world, while in actual strength at the moment it is one of

the least. The international problems raised by this situation have been

brought into the forefront of world-politics by the Washington

Conference. What settlement, if any, will ultimately be arrived at, it

is as yet impossible to foresee. There are, however, certain broad facts

and principles which no wise solution can ignore, for which I shall try

to give the evidence in the course of the following chapters, but which

it may be as well to state briefly at the outset. First, the Chinese,

though as yet incompetent in politics and backward in economic

development, have, in other respects, a civilization at least as good as

our own, containing elements which the world greatly needs, and which we

shall destroy at our peril. Secondly, the Powers have inflicted upon

China a multitude of humiliations and disabilities, for which excuses

have been found in China's misdeeds, but for which the sole real reason

has been China's military and naval weakness. Thirdly, the best of the

Great Powers at present, in relation to China, is America, and the worst

is Japan; in the interests of China, as well as in our own larger

interests, it is an immense advance that we have ceased to support Japan

and have ranged ourselves on the side of America, in so far as America

stands for Chinese freedom, but not when Japanese freedom is threatened.

Fourthly, in the long run, the Chinese cannot escape economic domination

by foreign Powers unless China becomes military or the foreign Powers

become Socialistic, because the capitalist system involves in its very

essence a predatory relation of the strong towards the weak,

internationally as well as nationally. A strong military China would be

a disaster; therefore Socialism in Europe and America affords the only

ultimate solution.

After these preliminary remarks, I come to the theme of this chapter,

namely, the present internal condition of China.

As everyone knows, China, after having an Emperor for forty centuries,

decided, eleven years ago, to become a modern democratic republic. Many

causes led up to this result. Passing over the first 3,700 years of

Chinese history, we arrive at the Manchu conquest in 1644, when a

warlike invader from the north succeeded in establishing himself upon

the Dragon Throne. He set to work to induce Chinese men to wear pigtails

and Chinese women to have big feet. After a time a statesmanlike

compromise was arranged: pigtails were adopted but big feet were

rejected; the new absurdity was accepted and the old one retained. This

characteristic compromise shows how much England and China have in

common.

The Manchu Emperors soon became almost completely Chinese, but

differences of dress and manners kept the Manchus distinct from the

more civilized people whom they had conquered, and the Chinese remained

inwardly hostile to them. From 1840 to 1900, a series of disastrous

foreign wars, culminating in the humiliation of the Boxer time,

destroyed the prestige of the Imperial Family and showed all thoughtful

people the need of learning from Europeans. The Taiping rebellion, which

lasted for 15 years (1849-64), is thought by Putnam Weale to have

diminished the population by 150 millions,[31] and was almost as

terrible a business as the Great War. For a long time it seemed doubtful

whether the Manchus could suppress it, and when at last they succeeded

(by the help of Gordon) their energy was exhausted. The defeat of China

by Japan (1894-5) and the vengeance of the Powers after the Boxer rising

(1900) finally opened the eyes of all thoughtful Chinese to the need for

a better and more modern government than that of the Imperial Family.

But things move slowly in China, and it was not till eleven years after

the Boxer movement that the revolution broke out.

The revolution of 1911, in China, was a moderate one, similar in spirit

to ours of 1688. Its chief promoter, Sun Yat Sen, now at the head of the

Canton Government, was supported by the Republicans, and was elected

provisional President. But the Nothern Army remained faithful to the

dynasty, and could probably have defeated the revolutionaries. Its

Commander-in-Chief, Yuan Shih-k'ai, however, hit upon a better scheme.

He made peace with the revolutionaries and acknowledged the Republic, on

condition that he should be the first President instead of Sun Yat Sen.

Yuan Shih-k'ai was, of course, supported by the Legations, being what is

called a "strong man," _i.e._ a believer in blood and iron, not likely

to be led astray by talk about democracy or freedom. In China, the North

has always been more military and less liberal than the South, and Yuan

Shih-k'ai had created out of Northern troops whatever China possessed in

the way of a modern army. As he was also ambitious and treacherous, he

had every quality needed for inspiring confidence in the diplomatic

corps. In view of the chaos which has existed since his death, it must

be admitted, however, that there was something to be said in favour of

his policy and methods.

A Constituent Assembly, after enacting a provisional constitution, gave

place to a duly elected Parliament, which met in April 1913 to determine

the permanent constitution. Yuan soon began to quarrel with the

Parliament as to the powers of the President, which the Parliament

wished to restrict. The majority in Parliament was opposed to Yuan, but

he had the preponderance in military strength. Under these

circumstances, as was to be expected, constitutionalism was soon

overthrown. Yuan made himself financially independent of Parliament

(which had been duly endowed with the power of the purse) by

unconstitutionally concluding a loan with the foreign banks. This led to

a revolt of the South, which, however, Yuan quickly suppressed. After

this, by various stages, he made himself virtually absolute ruler of

China. He appointed his army lieutenants military governors of

provinces, and sent Northern troops into the South. His régime might

have lasted but for the fact that, in 1915, he tried to become Emperor,

and was met by a successful revolt. He died in 1916--of a broken heart,

it was said.

Since then there has been nothing but confusion in China. The military

governors appointed by Yuan refused to submit to the Central Government

when his strong hand was removed, and their troops terrorized the

populations upon whom they were quartered. Ever since there has been

civil war, not, as a rule, for any definite principle, but simply to

determine which of various rival generals should govern various groups

of provinces. There still remains the issue of North versus South, but

this has lost most of its constitutional significance.

The military governors of provinces or groups of provinces, who are

called Tuchuns, govern despotically in defiance of Peking, and commit

depredations on the inhabitants of the districts over which they rule.

They intercept the revenue, except the portions collected and

administered by foreigners, such as the salt tax. They are nominally

appointed by Peking, but in practice depend only upon the favour of the

soldiers in their provinces. The Central Government is nearly bankrupt,

and is usually unable to pay the soldiers, who live by loot and by such

portions of the Tuchun's illgotten wealth as he finds it prudent to

surrender to them. When any faction seemed near to complete victory, the

Japanese supported its opponents, in order that civil discord might be

prolonged. While I was in Peking, the three most important Tuchuns met

there for a conference on the division of the spoils. They were barely

civil to the President and the Prime Minister, who still officially

represent China in the eyes of foreign Powers. The unfortunate nominal

Government was obliged to pay to these three worthies, out of a bankrupt

treasury, a sum which the newspapers stated to be nine million dollars,

to secure their departure from the capital. The largest share went to

Chang-tso-lin, the Viceroy of Manchuria and commonly said to be a tool

of Japan. His share was paid to cover the expenses of an expedition to

Mongolia, which had revolted; but no one for a moment supposed that he

would undertake such an expedition, and in fact he has remained at

Mukden ever since.[32]

In the extreme south, however, there has been established a Government

of a different sort, for which it is possible to have some respect.

Canton, which has always been the centre of Chinese radicalism,

succeeded, in the autumn of 1920, in throwing off the tyranny of its

Northern garrison and establishing a progressive efficient Government

under the Presidency of Sun Yat Sen. This Government now embraces two

provinces, Kwangtung (of which Canton is the capital) and Kwangsi. For a

moment it seemed likely to conquer the whole of the South, but it has

been checked by the victories of the Northern General Wu-Pei-Fu in the

neighbouring province of Hunan. Its enemies allege that it cherishes

designs of conquest, and wishes to unite all China under its sway.[33]

In all ascertainable respects it is a Government which deserves the

support of all progressive people. Professor Dewey, in articles in the

_New Republic_, has set forth its merits, as well as the bitter enmity

which it has encountered from Hong-Kong and the British generally. This

opposition is partly on general principles, because we dislike radical

reform, partly because of the Cassel agreement. This agreement--of a

common type in China--would have given us a virtual monopoly of the

railways and mines in the province of Kwangtung. It had been concluded

with the former Government, and only awaited ratification, but the

change of Government has made ratification impossible. The new

Government, very properly, is befriended by the Americans, and one of

them, Mr. Shank, concluded an agreement with the new Government more or

less similar to that which we had concluded with the old one. The

American Government, however, did not support Mr. Shank, whereas the

British Government did support the Cassel agreement. Meanwhile we have

lost a very valuable though very iniquitous concession, merely because

we, but not the Americans, prefer what is old and corrupt to what is

vigorous and honest. I understand, moreover, that the Shank agreement

lapsed because Mr. Shank could not raise the necessary capital.

The anarchy in China is, of course, very regrettable, and every friend

of China must hope that it will be brought to an end. But it would be a

mistake to exaggerate the evil, or to suppose that it is comparable in

magnitude to the evils endured in Europe. China must not be compared to

a single European country, but to Europe as a whole. In _The Times_ of

November 11, 1921, I notice a pessimistic article headed: "The Peril of

China. A dozen rival Governments." But in Europe there are much more

than a dozen Governments, and their enmities are much fiercer than those

of China. The number of troops in Europe is enormously greater than in

China, and they are infinitely better provided with weapons of

destruction. The amount of fighting in Europe since the Armistice has

been incomparably more than the amount in China during the same period.

You may travel through China from end to end, and it is ten to one that

you will see no signs of war. Chinese battles are seldom bloody, being

fought by mercenary soldiers who take no interest in the cause for which

they are supposed to be fighting. I am inclined to think that the

inhabitants of China, at the present moment, are happier, on the

average, than the inhabitants of Europe taken as a whole.

It is clear, I think, that political reform in China, when it becomes

possible, will have to take the form of a federal constitution, allowing

a very large measure of autonomy to the provinces. The division into

provinces is very ancient, and provincial feeling is strong. After the

revolution, a constitution more or less resembling our own was

attempted, only with a President instead of a King. But the successful

working of a non-federal constitution requires a homogeneous population

without much local feeling, as may be seen from our own experience in

Ireland. Most progressive Chinese, as far as I was able to judge, now

favour a federal constitution, leaving to the Central Government not

much except armaments, foreign affairs, and customs. But the difficulty

of getting rid of the existing military anarchy is very great. The

Central Government cannot disband the troops, because it cannot find

the money to pay them. It would be necessary to borrow from abroad

enough money to pay off the troops and establish them in new jobs. But

it is doubtful whether any Power or Powers would make such a loan

without exacting the sacrifice of the last remnants of Chinese

independence. One must therefore hope that somehow the Chinese will find

a way of escaping from their troubles without too much foreign

assistance.

It is by no means impossible that one of the Tuchuns may become supreme,

and may then make friends with the constitutionalists as the best way of

consolidating his influence. China is a country where public opinion has

great weight, and where the desire to be thought well of may quite

possibly lead a successful militarist into patriotic courses. There are,

at the moment, two Tuchuns who are more important than any of the

others. These are Chang-tso-lin and Wu-Pei-Fu, both of whom have been

already mentioned. Chang-tso-lin is supreme in Manchuria, and strong in

Japanese support; he represents all that is most reactionary in China.

Wu-Pei-Fu, on the other hand, is credited with liberal tendencies. He is

an able general; not long ago, nominally at the bidding of Peking, he

established his authority on the Yangtze and in Hunan, thereby dealing a

blow to the hopes of Canton. It is not easy to see how he could come to

terms with the Canton Government, especially since it has allied itself

with Chang-tso-lin, but in the rest of China he might establish his

authority and seek to make it permanent by being constitutional (see

Appendix). If so, China might have a breathing-space, and a

breathing-space is all that is needed.

The economic life of China, except in the Treaty Ports and in a few

regions where there are mines, is still wholly pre-industrial. Peking

has nearly a million inhabitants, and covers an enormous area, owing to

the fact that all the houses have only a ground floor and are built

round a courtyard. Yet it has no trams or buses or local trains. So far

as I could see, there are not more than two or three factory chimneys in

the whole town. Apart from begging, trading, thieving and Government

employment, people live by handicrafts. The products are exquisite and

the work less monotonous than machine-minding, but the hours are long

and the pay infinitesimal.

Seventy or eighty per cent. of the population of China are engaged in

agriculture. Rice and tea are the chief products of the south, while

wheat and other kinds of grain form the staple crops in the north.[34]

The rainfall is very great in the south, but in the north it is only

just sufficient to prevent the land from being a desert. When I arrived

in China, in the autumn of 1920, a large area in the north, owing to

drought, was afflicted with a terrible famine, nearly as bad, probably,

as the famine in Russia in 1921. As the Bolsheviks were not concerned,

foreigners had no hesitation in trying to bring relief. As for the

Chinese, they regarded it passively as a stroke of fate, and even those

who died of it shared this view.

Most of the land is in the hands of peasant proprietors, who divide

their holdings among their sons, so that each man's share becomes barely

sufficient to support himself and his family. Consequently, when the

rainfall is less than usual, immense numbers perish of starvation. It

would of course be possible, for a time, to prevent famines by more

scientific methods of agriculture, and to prevent droughts and floods by

afforestation. More railways and better roads would give a vastly

improved market, and might greatly enrich the peasants for a generation.

But in the long run, if the birth-rate is as great as is usually

supposed, no permanent cure for their poverty is possible while their

families continue to be so large. In China, Malthus's theory of

population, according to many writers, finds full scope.[35] If so, the

good done by any improvement of methods will lead to the survival of

more children, involving a greater subdivision of the land, and in the

end, a return to the same degree of poverty. Only education and a higher

standard of life can remove the fundamental cause of these evils. And

popular education, on a large scale, is of course impossible until there

is a better Government and an adequate revenue. Apart even from these

difficulties, there does not exist, as yet, a sufficient supply of

competent Chinese teachers for a system of universal elementary

education.

Apart from war, the impact of European civilization upon the traditional

life of China takes two forms, one commercial, the other intellectual.

Both depend upon the prestige of armaments; the Chinese would never have

opened either their ports to our trade or their minds to our ideas if we

had not defeated them in war. But the military beginning of our

intercourse with the Middle Kingdom has now receded into the background;

one is not conscious, in any class, of a strong hostility to foreigners

as such. It would not be difficult to make out a case for the view that

intercourse with the white races is proving a misfortune to China, but

apparently this view is not taken by anyone in China except where

unreasoning conservative prejudice outweighs all other considerations.

The Chinese have a very strong instinct for trade, and a considerable

intellectual curiosity, to both of which we appeal. Only a bare minimum

of common decency is required to secure their friendship, whether

privately or politically. And I think their thought is as capable of

enriching our culture as their commerce of enriching our pockets.

In the Treaty Ports, Europeans and Americans live in their own quarters,

with streets well paved and lighted, houses in European style, and shops

full of American and English goods. There is generally also a Chinese

part of the town, with narrow streets, gaily decorated shops, and the

rich mixture of smells characteristic of China. Often one passes through

a gate, suddenly, from one to the other; after the cheerful disordered

beauty of the old town, Europe's ugly cleanliness and

Sunday-go-to-meeting decency make a strange complex impression,

half-love and half-hate. In the European town one finds safety,

spaciousness and hygiene; in the Chinese town, romance, overcrowding and

disease. In spite of my affection for China, these transitions always

made me realize that I am a European; for me, the Chinese manner of life

would not mean happiness. But after making all necessary deductions for

the poverty and the disease, I am inclined to think that Chinese life

brings more happiness to the Chinese than English life does to us. At

any rate this seemed to me to be true for the men; for the women I do

not think it would be true.

Shanghai and Tientsin are white men's cities; the first sight of

Shanghai makes one wonder what is the use of travelling, because there

is so little change from what one is used to. Treaty Ports, each of

which is a centre of European influence, exist practically all over

China, not only on the sea coast. Hankow, a very important Treaty Port,

is almost exactly in the centre of China. North and South China are

divided by the Yangtze; East and West China are divided by the route

from Peking to Canton. These two dividing lines meet at Hankow, which

has long been an important strategical point in Chinese history. From

Peking to Hankow there is a railway, formerly Franco-Belgian, now owned

by the Chinese Government. From Wuchang, opposite Hankow on the southern

bank of the river, there is to be a railway to Canton, but at present it

only runs half-way, to Changsha, also a Treaty Port. The completion of

the railway, together with improved docks, will greatly increase the

importance of Canton and diminish that of Hong-Kong.

In the Treaty Ports commerce is the principal business; but in the lower

Yangtze and in certain mining districts there are beginnings of

industrialism. China produces large amounts of raw cotton, which are

mostly manipulated by primitive methods; but there are a certain number

of cotton-mills on modern lines. If low wages meant cheap labour for the

employer, there would be little hope for Lancashire, because in Southern

China the cotton is grown on the spot, the climate is damp, and there is

an inexhaustible supply of industrious coolies ready to work very long

hours for wages upon which an English working-man would find it

literally impossible to keep body and soul together. Nevertheless, it is

not the underpaid Chinese coolie whom Lancashire has to fear, and China

will not become a formidable competitor until improvement in methods and

education enables the Chinese workers to earn good wages. Meanwhile, in

China, as in every other country, the beginnings of industry are sordid

and cruel. The intellectuals wish to be told of some less horrible

method by which their country may be industrialized, but so far none is

in sight.

The intelligentsia in China has a very peculiar position, unlike that

which it has in any other country. Hereditary aristocracy has been

practically extinct in China for about 2,000 years, and for many

centuries the country has been governed by the successful candidates in

competitive examinations. This has given to the educated the kind of

prestige elsewhere belonging to a governing aristocracy. Although the

old traditional education is fast dying out, and higher education now

teaches modern subjects, the prestige of education has survived, and

public opinion is still ready to be influenced by those who have

intellectual qualifications. The Tuchuns, many of whom, including

Chang-tso-lin, have begun by being brigands,[36] are, of course, mostly

too stupid and ignorant to share this attitude, but that in itself makes

their régime weak and unstable. The influence of Young China--_i.e._ of

those who have been educated either abroad or in modern colleges at

home--is far greater than it would be in a country with less respect for

learning. This is, perhaps, the most hopeful feature in the situation,

because the number of modern students is rapidly increasing, and their

outlook and aims are admirable. In another ten years or so they will

probably be strong enough to regenerate China--if only the Powers will

allow ten years to elapse without taking any drastic action.

It is important to try to understand the outlook and potentialities of

Young China. Most of my time was spent among those Chinese who had had a

modern education, and I should like to give some idea of their

mentality. It seemed to me that one could already distinguish two

generations: the older men, who had fought their way with great

difficulty and almost in solitude out of the traditional Confucian

prejudices; and the younger men, who had found modern schools and

colleges waiting for them, containing a whole world of modern-minded

people ready to give sympathy and encouragement in the inevitable fight

against the family. The older men--men varying in age from 30 to

50--have gone through an inward and outward struggle resembling that of

the rationalists of Darwin's and Mill's generation. They have had,

painfully and with infinite difficulty, to free their minds from the

beliefs instilled in youth, and to turn their thoughts to a new science

and a new ethic. Imagine (say) Plotinus recalled from the shades and

miraculously compelled to respect Mr. Henry Ford; this will give you

some idea of the centuries across which these men have had to travel in

becoming European. Some of them are a little weary with the effort,

their forces somewhat spent and their originality no longer creative.

But this can astonish no one who realizes the internal revolution they

have achieved in their own minds.

It must not be supposed that an able Chinaman, when he masters our

culture, becomes purely imitative. This may happen among the second-rate

Chinese, especially when they turn Christians, but it does not happen

among the best. They remain Chinese, critical of European civilization

even when they have assimilated it. They retain a certain crystal

candour and a touching belief in the efficacy of moral forces; the

industrial revolution has not yet affected their mental processes. When

they become persuaded of the importance of some opinion, they try to

spread it by setting forth the reasons in its favour; they do not hire

the front pages of newspapers for advertising, or put up on hoardings

along the railways "So-and-so's opinion is the best." In all this they

differ greatly from more advanced nations, and particularly from

America; it never occurs to them to treat opinions as if they were

soaps. And they have no admiration for ruthlessness, or love of bustling

activity without regard to its purpose. Having thrown over the

prejudices in which they were brought up, they have not taken on a new

set, but have remained genuinely free in their thoughts, able to

consider any proposition honestly on its merits.

The younger men, however, have something more than the first generation

of modern intellectuals. Having had less of a struggle, they have

retained more energy and self-confidence. The candour and honesty of the

pioneers survive, with more determination to be socially effective. This

may be merely the natural character of youth, but I think it is more

than that. Young men under thirty have often come in contact with

Western ideas at a sufficiently early age to have assimilated them

without a great struggle, so that they can acquire knowledge without

being torn by spiritual conflicts. And they have been able to learn

Western knowledge from Chinese teachers to begin with, which has made

the process less difficult. Even the youngest students, of course, still

have reactionary families, but they find less difficulty than their

predecessors in resisting the claims of the family, and in realizing

practically, not only theoretically, that the traditional Chinese

reverence for the old may well be carried too far. In these young men I

see the hope of China. When a little experience has taught them

practical wisdom, I believe they will be able to lead Chinese opinion in

the directions in which it ought to move.

There is one traditional Chinese belief which dies very hard, and that

is the belief that correct ethical sentiments are more important then

detailed scientific knowledge. This view is, of course, derived from the

Confucian tradition, and is more or less true in a pre-industrial

society. It would have been upheld by Rousseau or Dr. Johnson, and

broadly speaking by everybody before the Benthamites. We, in the West,

have now swung to the opposite extreme: we tend to think that technical

efficiency is everything and moral purpose nothing. A battleship may be

taken as the concrete embodiment of this view. When we read, say, of

some new poison-gas by means of which one bomb from an aeroplane can

exterminate a whole town, we have a thrill of what we fondly believe to

be horror, but it is really delight in scientific skill. Science is our

god; we say to it, "Though thou slay me, yet will I trust in thee." And

so it slays us. The Chinese have not this defect, but they have the

opposite one, of believing that good intentions are the only thing

really necessary. I will give an illustration. Forsythe Sherfesee,

Forestry Adviser to the Chinese Government, gave an address at the

British Legation in January 1919 on "Some National Aspects of Forestry

in China."[37] In this address he proves (so far as a person ignorant of

forestry can judge) that large parts of China which now lie waste are

suitable for forestry, that the importation of timber (_e.g_. for

railway sleepers) which now takes place is wholly unnecessary, and that

the floods which often sweep away whole districts would be largely

prevented if the slopes of the mountains from which the rivers come were

reafforested. Yet it is often difficult to interest even the most

reforming Chinese in afforestation, because it is not an easy subject

for ethical enthusiasm. Trees are planted round graves, because

Confucius said they should be; if Confucianism dies out, even these will

be cut down. But public-spirited Chinese students learn political theory

as it is taught in our universities, and despise such humble questions

as the utility of trees. After learning all about (say) the proper

relations of the two Houses of Parliament, they go home to find that

some Tuchun has dismissed both Houses, and is governing in a fashion not

considered in our text-books. Our theories of politics are only true in

the West (if there); our theories of forestry are equally true

everywhere. Yet it is our theories of politics that Chinese students are

most eager to learn. Similarly the practical study of industrial

processes might be very useful, but the Chinese prefer the study of our

theoretical economics, which is hardly applicable except where industry

is already developed. In all these respects, however, there is beginning

to be a marked improvement.

It is science that makes the difference between our intellectual outlook

and that of the Chinese intelligentsia. The Chinese, even the most

modern, look to the white nations, especially America, for moral maxims

to replace those of Confucius. They have not yet grasped that men's

morals in the mass are the same everywhere: they do as much harm as they

dare, and as much good as they must. In so far as there is a difference

of morals between us and the Chinese, we differ for the worse, because

we are more energetic, and can therefore commit more crimes _per diem_.

What we have to teach the Chinese is not morals, or ethical maxims about

government, but science and technical skill. The real problem for the

Chinese intellectuals is to acquire Western knowledge without acquiring

the mechanistic outlook.

Perhaps it is not clear what I mean by "the mechanistic outlook." I mean

something which exists equally in Imperialism, Bolshevism and the

Y.M.C.A.; something which distinguishes all these from the Chinese

outlook, and which I, for my part, consider very evil. What I mean is

the habit of regarding mankind as raw material, to be moulded by our

scientific manipulation into whatever form may happen to suit our fancy.

The essence of the matter, from the point of view of the individual who

has this point of view, is the cultivation of will at the expense of

perception, the fervent moral belief that it is our duty to force other

people to realize our conception of the world. The Chinese intellectual

is not much troubled by Imperialism as a creed, but is vigorously

assailed by Bolshevism and the Y.M.C.A., to one or other of which he is

too apt to fall a victim, learning a belief from the one in the

class-war and the dictatorship of the communists, from the other in the

mystic efficacy of cold baths and dumb-bells. Both these creeds, in

their Western adepts, involve a contempt for the rest of mankind except

as potential converts, and the belief that progress consists in the

spread of a doctrine. They both involve a belief in government and a

life against Nature. This view, though I have called it mechanistic, is

as old as religion, though mechanism has given it new and more virulent

forms. The first of Chinese philosophers, Lao-Tze, wrote his book to

protest against it, and his disciple Chuang-Tze put his criticism into a

fable[38]:--

Horses have hoofs to carry them over frost and snow; hair, to

protect them from wind and cold. They eat grass and drink water,

and fling up their heels over the champaign. Such is the real

nature of horses. Palatial dwellings are of no use to them.

One day Po Lo appeared, saying: "I understand the management of

horses."

So he branded them, and clipped them, and pared their hoofs, and

put halters on them, tying them up by the head and shackling them

by the feet, and disposing them in stables, with the result that

two or three in every ten died. Then he kept them hungry and

thirsty, trotting them and galloping them, and grooming, and

trimming, with the misery of the tasselled bridle before and the

fear of the knotted whip behind, until more than half of them

were dead.

The potter says: "I can do what I will with clay. If I want it

round, I use compasses; if rectangular, a square."

The carpenter says: "I can do what I will with wood. If I want it

curved, I use an arc; if straight, a line."

But on what grounds can we think that the natures of clay and

wood desire this application of compasses and square, of arc and

line? Nevertheless, every age extols Po Lo for his skill in

managing horses, and potters and carpenters for their skill with

clay and wood. Those who _govern_ the Empire make the same

mistake.

Although Taoism, of which Lao-Tze was the founder and Chuang-Tze the

chief apostle, was displaced by Confucianism, yet the spirit of this

fable has penetrated deeply into Chinese life, making it more urbane and

tolerant, more contemplative and observant, than the fiercer life of the

West. The Chinese watch foreigners as we watch animals in the Zoo, to

see whether they "drink water and fling up their heels over the

champaign," and generally to derive amusement from their curious habits.

Unlike the Y.M.C.A., they have no wish to alter the habits of the

foreigners, any more than we wish to put the monkeys at the Zoo into

trousers and stiff shirts. And their attitude towards each other is, as

a rule, equally tolerant. When they became a Republic, instead of

cutting off the Emperor's head, as other nations do, they left him his

title, his palace, and four million dollars a year (about £600,000), and

he remains to this moment with his officials, his eunuchs and his

etiquette, but without one shred of power or influence. In talking with

a Chinese, you feel that he is trying to understand you, not to alter

you or interfere with you. The result of his attempt may be a caricature

or a panegyric, but in either case it will be full of delicate

perception and subtle humour. A friend in Peking showed me a number of

pictures, among which I specially remember various birds: a hawk

swooping on a sparrow, an eagle clasping a big bough of a tree in his

claws, water-fowl standing on one leg disconsolate in the snow. All

these pictures showed that kind of sympathetic understanding which one

feels also in their dealings with human beings--something which I can

perhaps best describe as the antithesis of Nietzsche. This quality,

unfortunately, is useless in warfare, and foreign nations are doing

their best to stamp it out. But it is an infinitely valuable quality, of

which our Western world has far too little. Together with their

exquisite sense of beauty, it makes the Chinese nation quite

extraordinarily lovable. The injury that we are doing to China is wanton

and cruel, the destruction of something delicate and lovely for the sake

of the gross pleasures of barbarous millionaires. One of the poems

translated from the Chinese by Mr. Waley[39] is called _Business Men_,

and it expresses, perhaps more accurately than I could do, the respects

in which the Chinese are our superiors:--

Business men boast of their skill and cunning

But in philosophy they are like little children.

Bragging to each other of successful depredations

They neglect to consider the ultimate fate of the body.

What should they know of the Master of Dark Truth

Who saw the wide world in a jade cup,

By illumined conception got clear of heaven and earth:

On the chariot of Mutation entered the Gate of Immutability?

I wish I could hope that some respect for "the Master of Dark Truth"

would enter into the hearts of our apostles of Western culture. But as

that is out of the question, it is necessary to seek other ways of

solving the Far Eastern question.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 31: _The Truth about China and Japan_, Allen & Unwin, 1921, p.

14. On the other hand Sih-Gung Cheng (_Modern China_, p. 13) says that

it "killed twenty million people," which is the more usual estimate, cf.

_China of the Chinese_ by E.T.C. Werner, p. 24. The extent to which the

population was diminished is not accurately known, but I have no doubt

that 20 millions is nearer the truth than 150 millions.]

[Footnote 32: In January 1922, he came to Peking to establish a more

subservient Government, the dismissal of which has been ordered by

Wu-Pei-Fu. A clash is imminent. See Appendix.]

[Footnote 33: The blame for this is put upon Sun Yat Sen, who is said to

have made an alliance with Chang-tso-lin. The best element in the Canton

Government was said to be represented by Sun's colleague General Cheng

Chiung Ming, who is now reported to have been dismissed (_The Times_,

April 24, 1922). These statements are apparently unfounded. See

Appendix.]

[Footnote 34: The soya bean is rapidly becoming an important product,

especially in Manchuria.]

[Footnote 35: There are, however, no accurate statistics as to the

birth-rate or the death-rate in China, and some writers question whether

the birth-rate is really very large. From a privately printed pamphlet

by my friend Mr. V.K. Ting, I learn that Dr. Lennox, of the Peking Union

Medical College, from a careful study of 4,000 families, found that the

average number of children (dead and living) per family was 2.1, while

the infant mortality was 184.1. Other investigations are quoted to show

that the birth-rate near Peking is between 30 and 50. In the absence of

statistics, generalizations about the population question in China must

be received with extreme caution.]

[Footnote 36: I repeat what everybody, Chinese or foreign, told me. Mr.

Bland, _per contra_, describes Chang-tso-lin as a polished Confucian.

Contrast p. 104 of his _China, Japan and Korea_ with pp. 143, 146 of

Coleman's _The Far East Unveiled_, which gives the view of everybody

except Mr. Bland. Lord Northcliffe had an interview with Chang-tso-lin

reported in _The Times_ recently, but he was, of course, unable to

estimate Chang-tso-lin's claims to literary culture.]

[Footnote 37: Printed in _China in 1918_, published by the _Peking

Leader_.]

[Footnote 38: _Musings of a Chinese Mystic_, by Lionel Giles (Murray),

p. 66. For Legge's translation, see Vol. I, p. 277 of his _Texts of

Taoism_ in _Sacred Books of the East_, Vol. XXXIX.]

[Footnote 39: Waley, 170 _Chinese Poems_, p. 96.]

The Problem of China · 第 4 / 15 章