BURMAN [50].

Peter Burman was born at Utrecht, on the 26th day of June, 1668. The

family from which he descended has, for several generations, produced

men of great eminence for piety and learning; and his father, who was

professor of divinity in the university, and pastor of the city of

Utrech't, was equally celebrated for the strictness of his life, the

efficacy and orthodoxy of his sermons, and the learning and

perspicuity of his academical lectures.

From the assistance and instruction which such a father would

doubtless have been encouraged by the genius of this son not to have

omitted, he was unhappily cut off at eleven years of age, being at

that time, by his father's death, thrown entirely under the care of

his mother, by whose diligence, piety, and prudence, his education was

so regulated, that he had scarcely any reason, but filial tenderness,

to regret the loss of his father.

He was, about this time, sent to the publick school of Utrecht, to be

instructed in the learned languages; and it will convey no common idea

of his capacity and industry to relate, that he had passed through the

classes, and was admitted into the university in his thirteenth year.

This account of the rapidity of his progress in the first part of his

studies is so stupendous, that, though it is attested by his friend,

Dr. Osterdyke, of whom it cannot be reasonably suspected that he is

himself deceived, or that he can desire to deceive others, it must be

allowed far to exceed the limits of probability, if it be considered,

with regard to the methods of education practised in our country,

where it is not uncommon for the highest genius, and most

comprehensive capacity, to be entangled for ten years, in those thorny

paths of literature, which Burman is represented to have passed in

less than two; and we must, doubtless, confess the most skilful of our

masters much excelled by the address of the Dutch teachers, or the

abilities of our greatest scholars far surpassed by those of Burinan.

But, to reduce this narrative to credibility, it is necessary that

admiration should give place to inquiry, and that it be discovered

what proficiency in literature is expected from a student, requesting

to be admitted into a Dutch university. It is to be observed, that in

the universities of foreign countries, they have professors of

philology, or humanity, whose employment is to instruct the younger

classes in grammar, rhetorick, and languages; nor do they engage in

the study of philosophy, till they have passed through a course of

philological lectures and exercises, to which, in some places, two

years are commonly allotted.

The English scheme of education, which, with regard to academical

studies, is more rigorous, and sets literary honours at a higher price

than that of any other country, exacts from the youth, who are

initiated in our colleges, a degree of philological knowledge

sufficient to qualify them for lectures in philosophy, which are read

to them in Latin, and to enable them to proceed in other studies

without assistance; so that it may be conjectured, that Burman, at his

entrance into the university, had no such skill in languages, nor such

ability of composition, as are frequently to be met with in the higher

classes of an English school; nor was, perhaps, more than moderately

skilled in Latin, and taught the first rudiments of Greek.

In the university he was committed to the care of the learned Grævius,

whose regard for his father inclined him to superintend his studies

with more than common attention, which was soon confirmed and

increased by his discoveries of the genius of his pupil, and his

observation of his diligence.

One of the qualities which contributed eminently to qualify Grævius

for an instructor of youth, was the sagacity by which he readily

discovered the predominant faculty of each pupil, and the peculiar

designation by which nature had allotted him to any species of

literature, and by which he was soon able to determine, that Burman

was remarkably adapted to classical studies, and predict the great

advances that he would make, by industriously pursuing the direction

of his genius.

Animated by the encouragement of a tutor so celebrated, he continued

the vigour of his application, and, for several years, not only

attended the lectures of Grævius, but made use of every other

opportunity of improvement, with such diligence as might justly be

expected to produce an uncommon proficiency.

Having thus attained a sufficient degree of classical knowledge to

qualify him for inquiries into other sciences, he applied himself to

the study of the law, and published a dissertation, de Vicesima

Hæreditatum, which he publickly defended, under the professor Van

Muyden, with such learning and eloquence, as procured him great

applause.

Imagining, then, that the conversation of other men of learning might

be of use towards his further improvement, and rightly judging that

notions formed in any single seminary are, for the greatest part,

contracted and partial, he went to Leyden, where he studied philosophy

for a year, under M. de Volder, whose celebrity was so great, that the

schools assigned to the sciences, which it was his province to teach,

were not sufficient, though very spacious, to contain the audience

that crowded his lectures from all parts of Europe.

Yet he did not suffer himself to be engrossed by philosophical

disquisitions, to the neglect of those studies in which he was more

early engaged, and to which he was, perhaps, by nature better adapted;

for he attended at the same time Ryckius's explanations of Tacitus,

and James Gronovius's lectures on the Greek writers, and has often

been heard to acknowledge, at an advanced age, the assistance which he

received from them.

Having thus passed a year at Leyden with great advantage, he returned

to Utrecht, and once more applied himself to philological studies, by

the assistance of Grævius, whose early hopes of his genius were now

raised to a full confidence of that excellence, at which he afterwards

arrived.

At Utrecht, in March, 1688, in the twentieth year of his age, he was

advanced to the degree of doctor of laws; on which occasion he

published a learned dissertation, de Transactionibus, and defended it

with his usual eloquence, learning, and success.

The attainment of this honour was far from having upon Burman that

effect which has been too often observed to be produced in others,

who, having in their own opinion no higher object of ambition, have

relapsed into idleness and security, and spent the rest of their lives

in a lazy enjoyment of their academical dignities. Burman aspired to

further improvements, and, not satisfied with the opportunities of

literary conversation which Utrecht afforded, travelled into

Switzerland and Germany, where he gained an increase both of fame and

learning.

At his return from this excursion, he engaged in the practice of the

law, and pleaded several causes with such reputation, as might be

hoped by a man who had joined to his knowledge of the law, the

embellishments of polite literature, and the strict ratiocination of

true philosophy; and who was able to employ, on every occasion, the

graces of eloquence and the power of argumentation.

While Burman was hastening to high reputation in the courts of

justice, and to those riches and honours which always follow it, he

was summoned, in 1691, by the magistrates of Utrecht, to undertake the

charge of collector of the tenths, an office, in that place, of great

honour, and which he accepted, therefore, as a proof of their

confidence and esteem.

While he was engaged in this employment, he married Eve Clotterboke, a

young lady of a good family, and uncommon genius and beauty, by whom

he had ten children, of which eight died young; and only two sons,

Francis and Caspar, lived to console their mother for their father's

death.

Neither publick business nor domestick cares detained Burman from the

prosecution of his literary inquiries; by which he so much endeared

himself to Grævius, that he Was recommended by him to the regard of

the university of Utrecht, and, accordingly, in 1696, was chosen

professor of eloquence and history, to which was added, after some

time, the professorship of the Greek language, and afterwards that of

politicks; so various did they conceive his abilities, and so

extensive his knowledge.

At his entrance upon this new province, he pronounced an oration upon

eloquence and poetry.

Having now more frequent opportunities of displaying his learning, he

arose, in a short time, to a high reputation, of which the great

number of his auditors was a sufficient proof, and which the

proficiency of his pupils showed not to be accidental or undeserved.

In 1714, he formed a resolution of visiting Paris, not only for the

sake of conferring, in person, upon questions of literature, with the

learned men of that place, and of gratifying his curiosity with a more

familiar knowledge of those writers whose works he admired, but with a

view more important, of visiting the libraries, and making those

inquiries which might be of advantage to his darling study.

The vacation of the university allowed him to stay at Paris but six

weeks, which he employed with so much dexterity and industry, that he

had searched the principal libraries, collated a great number of

manuscripts and printed copies, and brought back a great treasure of

curious observations.

In this visit to Paris he contracted an acquaintance, among other

learned men, with the celebrated father Montfaucon; with whom he

conversed, at his first interview, with no other character but that of

a traveller; but, their discourse turning upon ancient learning, the

stranger soon gave such proofs of his attainments, that Montfaucon

declared him a very uncommon traveller, and confessed his curiosity to

know his name; which he no sooner heard, than he rose from his seat,

and, embracing him with the utmost ardour, expressed his satisfaction

at having seen the man whose productions of various kinds he had so

often praised; and, as a real proof of his regard, offered not only to

procure him an immediate admission to all the libraries of Paris, but

to those in remoter provinces, which are not generally open to

strangers, and undertook to ease the expenses of his journey, by

procuring him entertainment in all the monasteries of his order.

This favour Burman was hindered from accepting, by the necessity of

returning to Utrecht at the usual time of beginning a new course of

lectures, to which there was always so great a concourse of students,

as much increased the dignity and fame of the university in which he

taught.

He had already extended to distant parts his reputation for knowledge

of ancient history, by a treatise, de Vectigalibus Populi Romani, on

the revenues of the Romans; and for his skill in Greek learning, and

in ancient coins, by a tract called Jupiter Fulgurator; and after his

return from Paris, he published Plædrus, first with the notes of

various commentators, and afterwards with his own. He printed many

poems, made many orations upon different subjects, and procured an

impression of the epistles of Gudius and Sanavius.

While he was thus employed, the professorships of history, eloquence,

and the Greek language, became vacant at Leyden, by the death of

Perizonius, which Burman's reputation incited the curators of the

university to offer him upon very generous terms, and which, after

some struggles with his fondness for his native place, his friends,

and his colleagues, he was prevailed on to accept, finding the

solicitations from Leyden warm and urgent, and his friends at Utrecht,

though unwilling to be deprived of him, yet not zealous enough for the

honour and advantage of their university, to endeavour to detain him

by great liberality.

At his entrance upon this new professorship, which was conferred upon

him in 1715, he pronounced an oration upon the duty and office of a

professor of polite literature; de publici humanioris disciplinæ

professoris proprio officio et munere; and showed, by the usefulness

and perspicuity of his lectures, that he was not confined to

speculative notions on that subject, having a very happy method of

accommodating his instructions to the different abilities and

attainments of his pupils.

Nor did he suffer the publick duties of this station to hinder him

from promoting learning by labours of a different kind; for, besides

many poems and orations, which he recited on different occasions, he

wrote several prefaces to the works of others, and published many

useful editions of the best Latin writers, with large collections of

notes from various commentators.

He was twice rector, or chief governour of the university, and

discharged that important office with equal equity and ability, and

gained, by his conduct in every station, so much esteem, that when the

professorship of history of the United Provinces became vacant, it was

conferred on him, as an addition to his honours and revenues, which he

might justly claim; and afterwards, as a proof of the continuance of

their regard, and a testimony that his reputation was still

increasing, they made him chief librarian, an office which was the

more acceptable to him, as it united his business with his pleasure,

and gave him an opportunity, at the same time, of superintending the

library, and carrying on his studies.

Such was the course of his life, till, in his old age, leaving off his

practice of walking, and other exercises, he began to be afflicted

with the scurvy, which discovered itself by very tormenting symptoms

of various kinds; sometimes disturbing his head with vertigos,

sometimes causing faintness in his limbs, and sometimes attacking his

legs with anguish so excruciating, that all his vigour was destroyed,

and the power of walking entirely taken away, till, at length, his

left foot became motionless. The violence of his pain produced

irregular fevers, deprived him of rest, and entirely debilitated his

whole frame.

This tormenting disease he bore, though not without some degree of

impatience, yet without any unbecoming or irrational despondency, and

applied himself in the intermission of his pains to seek for comfort

in the duties of religion.

While he lay in this state of misery he received an account of the

promotion of two of his grandsons, and a catalogue of the king of

France's library, presented to him by the command of the king himself,

and expressed some satisfaction on all these occasions; but soon

diverted his thoughts to the more important consideration of his

eternal state, into which he passed on the 31st of March, 1741, in the

seventy-third year of his age.

He was a man of moderate stature, of great strength and activity,

which he preserved by temperate diet, without medical exactness, and

by allotting proportions of his time to relaxation and amusement, not

suffering his studies to exhaust his strength, but relieving them by

frequent intermissions; a practice consistent with the most exemplary

diligence, and which he that omits will find at last, that time may be

lost, like money, by unseasonable avarice.

In his hours of relaxation he was gay, and sometimes gave way so far

to his temper, naturally satirical, that he drew upon himself the

ill-will of those who had been unfortunately the subjects of his

mirth; but enemies so provoked, he thought it beneath him to regard or

to pacify; for he was fiery, but not malicious, disdained

dissimulation, and in his gay or serious hours, preserved a settled

detestation of falsehood. So that he was an open and undisguised

friend or enemy, entirely unacquainted with the artifices of

flatterers, but so judicious in the choice of friends, and so constant

in his affection to them, that those with whom he had contracted

familiarity in his youth, had, for the greatest part, his confidence

in his old age.

His abilities, which would probably have enabled him to have excelled

in any kind of learning, were chiefly employed, as his station

required, on polite literature, in which he arrived at very uncommon

knowledge; which, however, appears rather from judicious compilations,

than original productions. His style is lively and masculine, but not

without harshness and constraint, nor, perhaps, always polished to

that purity, which some writers have attained. He was at least

instrumental to the instruction of mankind, by the publication of many

valuable performances, which lay neglected by the greatest part of the

learned world; and, if reputation be estimated by usefulness, he may

claim a higher degree in the ranks of learning, than some others of

happier elocution, or more vigorous imagination.

The malice or suspicion of those who either did not know, or did not

love him, had given rise to some doubts about his religion, which he

took an opportunity of removing on his death-bed, by a voluntary

declaration of his faith, his hope of everlasting salvation from the

revealed promises of God, and his confidence in the merits of our

Redeemer, of the sincerity of which declaration his whole behaviour in

his long illness was an incontestable proof; and he concluded his

life, which had been illustrious for many virtues, by exhibiting an

example of true piety.

Of his works we have not been able to procure a complete catalogue: he

published, Quintilianus, 2 vols. 4to; Valerius Flaccus; Ovidius, 4

vols. 4to; Poetæ Latini Minores, 2 vols. 4to; cum notis variorum.

Buchanani Opera, 2 vols. 4to [51].

The Works of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. in Eleven Volumes, Volume 06 Reviews, Political Tracts, and Lives of Eminent Persons · 第 64 / 72 题