THOUGHTS ON THE LATE TRANSACTIONS RESPECTING FALKLAND'S ISLANDS. 1771.

To proportion the eagerness of contest to its importance seems too hard

a task for human wisdom. The pride of wit has kept ages busy in the

discussion of useless questions, and the pride of power has destroyed

armies, to gain or to keep unprofitable possessions.

Not, many years have passed, since the cruelties of war were filling the

world with terrour and with sorrow; rage was at last appeased, or

strength exhausted, and, to the harassed nations peace was restored with

its pleasures and its benefits. Of this state all felt the happiness,

and all implored the continuance; but what continuance of happiness can

be expected, when the whole system of European empire can be in danger

of a new concussion, by a contention for a few spots of earth, which, in

the deserts of the ocean, had almost escaped human notice, and which, if

they had not happened to make a seamark, had, perhaps, never had a name!

Fortune often delights to dignify what nature has neglected; and that

renown which cannot be claimed by intrinsick excellence or greatness,

is, sometimes, derived from unexpected accidents. The Rubicon was

ennobled by the passage of Caesar, and the time is now come, when

Falkland's islands demand their historian.

But the writer, to whom this employment shall be assigned, will have few

opportunities of descriptive splendour, or narrative elegance. Of other

countries it is told, how often they have changed their government;

these islands have, hitherto, changed only their name. Of heroes to

conquer, or legislators to civilize, here has been no appearance;

nothing has happened to them, but that they have been, sometimes, seen

by wandering navigators, who passed by them in search of better

habitations.

When the Spaniards, who, under the conduct of Columbus, discovered

America, had taken possession of its most wealthy regions, they

surprised and terrified Europe, by a sudden and unexampled influx of

riches. They were made, at once, insupportably insolent, and might,

perhaps, have become irresistibly powerful, had not their mountainous

treasures been scattered in the air, with the ignorant profusion of

unaccustomed opulence.

The greater part of the European potentates saw this stream of riches

flowing into Spain, without attempting to dip their own hands in the

golden fountain. France had no naval skill or power; Portugal was

extending her dominions in the east, over regions formed in the gaiety

of nature; the Hanseatick league, being planned only for the security of

traffick, had no tendency to discovery or invasion; and the commercial

states of Italy, growing rich by trading between Asia and Europe, and

not lying upon the ocean, did not desire to seek, by great hazards, at a

distance, what was, almost at home, to be found with safety.

The English, alone, were animated by the success of the Spanish

navigators, to try if any thing was left that might reward adventure, or

incite appropriation. They sent Cabot into the north, but in the north

there was no gold or silver to be found. The best regions were

pre-occupied, yet they still continued their hopes and their labours.

They were the second nation that dared the extent of the Pacifick ocean,

and the second circumnavigators of the globe.

By the war between Elizabeth and Philip, the wealth of America became

lawful prize, and those who were less afraid of danger than of poverty,

supposed that riches might easily be obtained by plundering the

Spaniards. Nothing is difficult, when gain and honour unite their

influence; the spirit and vigour of these expeditions enlarged our views

of the new world, and made us first acquainted with its remoter coasts.

In the fatal voyage of Cavendish, (1592,) captain Davis, who, being sent

out as his associate, was afterwards parted from him, or deserted him,

as he was driven, by violence of weather, about the straits of Magellan,

is supposed to have been the first who saw the lands now called

Falkland's islands, but his distress permitted him not to make any

observation; and he left them, as he found them, without a name.

Not long afterwards, (1594,) sir Richard Hawkins being in the same seas,

with the same designs, saw these islands again, if they are, indeed, the

same islands, and, in honour of his mistress, called them Hawkins's

maiden land.

This voyage was not of renown sufficient to procure a general reception

to the new name; for when the Dutch, who had now become strong enough

not only to defend themselves, but to attack their masters, sent (1598)

Verhagen and Sebald de Wert into the South seas, these islands, which

were not supposed to have been known before, obtained the denomination

of Sebald's islands, and were, from that time, placed in the charts;

though Frezier tells us, that they were yet considered as of doubtful

existence.

Their present English name was, probably, given them (1689) by Strong,

whose journal, yet unprinted, may be found in the Museum. This name was

adopted by Halley, and has, from that time, I believe, been received

into our maps.

The privateers, which were put into motion by the wars of William and

Anne, saw those islands, and mention them; but they were yet not

considered as territories worth a contest. Strong affirmed that there

was no wood; and Dampier suspected that they had no water.

Frezier describes their appearance with more distinctness, and mentions

some ships of St. Malo's, by which they had been visited, and to which

he seems willing enough to ascribe the honour of discovering islands,

which yet he admits to have been seen by Hawkins, and named by Sebald de

Wert. He, I suppose, in honour of his countrymen, called them the

Malouines, the denomination now used by the Spaniards, who seem not,

till very lately, to have thought them important enough to deserve a

name.

Since the publication of Anson's voyage, they have very much changed

their opinion, finding a settlement in Pepys's, or Falkland's island,

recommended by the author as necessary to the success of our future

expeditions against the coast of Chili, and as of such use and

importance, that it would produce many advantages in peace, and, in war,

would make us masters of the South sea.

Scarcely any degree of judgment is sufficient to restrain the

imagination from magnifying that on which it is long detained. The

relater of Anson's voyage had heated his mind with its various events;

had partaken the hope with which it was begun, and the vexation suffered

by its various miscarriages, and then thought nothing could be of

greater benefit to the nation, than that which might promote the success

of such another enterprise.

Had the heroes of that history even performed and attained all that,

when they first spread their sails, they ventured to hope, the

consequence would yet have produced very little hurt to the Spaniards,

and very little benefit to the English. They would have taken a few

towns; Anson and his companions would have shared the plunder or the

ransome; and the Spaniards, finding their southern territories

accessible, would, for the future, have guarded them better.

That such a settlement may be of use in war, no man, that considers its

situation, will deny. But war is not the whole business of life; it

happens but seldom, and every man, either good or wise, wishes that its

frequency were still less. That conduct which betrays designs of future

hostility, if it does not excite violence, will always generate

malignity; it must for ever exclude confidence and friendship, and

continue a cold and sluggish rivalry, by a sly reciprocation of indirect

injuries, without the bravery of war or the security of peace.

The advantage of such a settlement, in time of peace, is, I think, not

easily to be proved. For what use can it have, but of a station for

contraband traders, a nursery of fraud, and a receptacle of theft!

Narborough, about a century ago, was of opinion, that no advantage could

be obtained in voyages to the South sea, except by such an armament as,

with a sailor's morality, _might trade by force_. It is well known, that

the prohibitions of foreign commerce, are, in these countries, to the

last degree, rigorous, and that no man, not authorized by the king of

Spain, can trade there but by force or stealth. Whatever profit is

obtained must be gained by the violence of rapine, or dexterity of

fraud.

Government will not, perhaps, soon arrive at such purity and excellence,

but that some connivance, at least, will be indulged to the triumphant

robber and successful cheat. He that brings wealth home is seldom

interrogated by what means it was obtained. This, however, is one of

those modes of corruption with which mankind ought always to struggle,

and which they may, in time, hope to overcome. There is reason to

expect, that, as the world is more enlightened, policy and morality

will, at last, be reconciled, and that nations will learn not to do what

they would not suffer.

But the silent toleration of suspected guilt is a degree of depravity

far below that which openly incites, and manifestly protects it. To

pardon a pirate may be injurious to mankind; but how much greater is the

crime of opening a port, in which all pirates shall be safe! The

contraband trader is not more worthy of protections; if, with

Narborough, he trades by force, he is a pirate; if he trade secretly, he

is only a thief. Those who honestly refuse his traffick, he hates, as

obstructers of his profit; and those, with whom he deals, he cheats,

because he knows that they dare not complain. He lives with a heart full

of that malignity, which fear of detection always generates in those,

who are to defend unjust acquisitions against lawful authority; and when

he comes home, with riches thus acquired, he brings a mind hardened in

evil, too proud for reproof, and too stupid for reflection; he offends

the high by his insolence, and corrupts the low by his example.

Whether these truths were forgotten, or despised; or, whether some

better purpose was then in agitation, the representation made in Anson's

voyage had such effect upon the statesmen of that time, that, in 1748,

some sloops were fitted out for the fuller knowledge of Pepys's and

Falkland's islands, and for further discoveries in the South sea. This

expedition, though, perhaps, designed to be secret, was not long

concealed from Wall, the Spanish ambassadour, who so vehemently opposed

it, and so strongly maintained the right of the Spaniards to the

exclusive dominion of the South sea, that the English ministry

relinquished part of their original design, and declared, that the

examination of those two islands was the utmost that their orders should

comprise.

This concession was sufficiently liberal or sufficiently submissive; yet

the Spanish court was neither gratified by our kindness, nor softened by

our humility. Sir Benjamin Keene, who then resided at Madrid, was

interrogated by Carvajal, concerning the visit intended to Pepys's and

Falkland's islands, in terms of great jealousy and discontent; and the

intended expedition was represented, if not as a direct violation of the

late peace, yet as an act inconsistent with amicable intentions, and

contrary to the professions of mutual kindness, which then passed

between Spain and England. Keene was directed to protest, that nothing

more than mere discovery was intended, and that no settlement was to be

established. The Spaniard readily replied, that, if this was a voyage of

wanton curiosity, it might be gratified with less trouble, for he was

willing to communicate whatever was known; that to go so far only to

come back was no reasonable act; and it would be a slender sacrifice to

peace and friendship to omit a voyage, in which nothing was to be

gained; that if we left the, places as we found them, the voyage was

useless; and if we took possession, it was a hostile armament; nor could

we expect that the Spaniards would suppose us to visit the southern

parts of America only from curiosity, after the scheme proposed by the

author of Anson's voyage.

When once we had disowned all purpose of settling, it is apparent, that

we could not defend the propriety of our expedition by arguments

equivalent to Carvajal's objections. The ministry, therefore, dismissed

the whole design, but no declaration was required, by which our right to

pursue it, hereafter, might be annulled.

From this time Falkland's island was forgotten or neglected, till the

conduct of naval affairs was intrusted to the earl of Egmont, a man

whose mind was vigorous and ardent, whose knowledge was extensive, and

whose designs were magnificent; but who had somewhat vitiated his

judgment by too much indulgence of romantick projects and airy

speculations.

Lord Egmont's eagerness after something new determined him to make

inquiry after Falkland's island, and he sent out captain Byron, who, in

the beginning of the year 1765, took, he says, a formal possession, in

the name of his Britannick majesty.

The possession of this place is, according to Mr. Byron's

representation, no despicable acquisition. He conceived the island to be

six or seven hundred miles round, and represented it, as a region naked

indeed of wood, but which, if that defect were supplied, would have all

that nature, almost all that luxury could want. The harbour he found

capacious and secure, and, therefore, thought it worthy of the name of

Egmont. Of water there was no want, and the ground he described, as

having all the excellencies of soil, and as covered with antiscorbutick

herbs, the restoratives of the sailor. Provision was easily to be had,

for they killed, almost every day, a hundred geese to each ship, by

pelting them with stones. Not content with physick and with food, he

searched yet deeper for the value of the new dominion. He dug in quest

of ore; found iron in abundance, and did not despair of nobler metals.

A country thus fertile and delightful, fortunately found where none

would have expected it, about the fiftieth degree of southern latitude,

could not, without great supineness, be neglected. Early in the next

year, (January 8, 1766,) captain Macbride arrived at port Egmont, where

he erected a small block-house, and stationed a garrison; His

description was less flattering. He found what he calls a mass of

islands and broken lands, of which the soil was nothing but a bog, with

no better prospect than that of barren mountains, beaten by storms

almost perpetual. Yet this, says he, is summer, and if the winds of

winter hold their natural proportion, those who lie but two cables'

length from the shore, must pass weeks without any communication with

it. The plenty which regaled Mr. Byron, and which might have supported

not only armies, but armies of Patagons, was no longer to be found. The

geese were too wise to stay, when men violated their haunts, and Mr.

Macbride's crew could only now and then kill a goose, when the weather

would permit. All the quadrupeds which he met there were foxes, supposed

by him to have been brought upon the ice; but of useless animals, such

as sea lions and penguins, which he calls vermin, the number was

incredible. He allows, however, that those who touch at these islands

may find geese and snipes, and, in the summer months, wild celery and

sorrel.

No token was seen, by either, of any settlement ever made upon this

island; and Mr. Macbride thought himself so secure from hostile

disturbance, that, when he erected his wooden block-house, he omitted to

open the ports and loopholes.

When a garrison was stationed at port Egmont, it was necessary to try

what sustenance the ground could be, by culture, excited to produce. A

garden was prepared; but the plants that sprung up withered away in

immaturity: some fir seeds were sown; but, though this be the native

tree of rugged climates, the young firs, that rose above the ground,

died like weaker herbage: the cold continued long, and the ocean seldom

was at rest.

Cattle succeeded better than vegetables. Goats, sheep, and hogs, that

were carried thither, were found to thrive and increase, as in other

places.

"Nil mortalibus arduum est:" there is nothing which human courage will

not undertake, and little that human, patience will not endure. The

garrison lived upon Falkland's island, shrinking from the blast, and

shuddering at the billows.

This was a colony which could never become independent, for it never

could be able to maintain itself. The necessary supplies were annually

sent from England, at an expense which the admiralty began to think

would not quickly be repaid. But shame of deserting a project, and

unwillingness to contend with a projector that meant well, continued the

garrison, and supplied it with regular remittances of stores and

provision.

That of which we were almost weary ourselves, we did not expect any one

to envy; and, therefore, supposed that we should be permitted to reside

in Falkland's island, the undisputed lords of tempest-beaten barrenness.

But, on the 28th of November, 1769, captain Hunt, observing a Spanish

schooner hovering about the island, and surveying it, sent the commander

a message, by which he required him to depart. The Spaniard made an

appearance of obeying, but, in two days, came back with letters, written

by the governour of port Solidad, and brought by the chief officer of a

settlement, on the east part of Falkland's island.

In this letter, dated Malouina, November 30, the governour complains,

that captain Hunt, when he ordered the schooner to depart, assumed a

power to which he could have no pretensions, by sending an imperious

message to the Spaniards, in the king of Spain's own dominions.

In another letter, sent at the same time, he supposes the English to be

in that part only by accident, and to be ready to depart, at the first

warning. This letter was accompanied by a present, of which, says he,

"If it be neither equal to my desire nor to your merit, you must impute

the deficiency to the situation of us both."

In return to this hostile civility, captain Hunt warned them from the

island, which he claimed in the name of the king, as belonging to the

English, by right of the first discovery and the first settlement.

This was an assertion of more confidence than certainty. The right of

discovery, indeed, has already appeared to be probable, but the right

which priority of settlement confers, I know not whether we yet can

establish.

On December 10, the officer, sent by the governour of port Solidad, made

three protests against captain Hunt, for threatening to fire upon him;

for opposing his entrance into port Egmont; and for entering himself

into port Solidad. On the 12th, the governour of port Solidad formally

warned captain Hunt to leave port Egmont, and to forbear the navigation

of these seas, without permission from the king of Spain.

To this captain Hunt replied, by repeating his former claim; by

declaring that his orders were to keep possession; and by once more

warning the Spaniards to depart.

The next month produced more protests and more replies, of which the

tenour was nearly the same. The operations of such harmless enmity

having produced no effect, were then reciprocally discontinued, and the

English were left, for a time, to enjoy the pleasures of Falkland's

island, without molestation.

This tranquillity, however, did not last long. A few months afterwards,

(June 4, 1770,) the Industry, a Spanish frigate, commanded by an

officer, whose name was Madariaga, anchored in port Egmont, bound, as

was said, for port Solidad, and reduced, by a passage from Buenos Ayres

of fifty-three days, to want of water.

Three days afterwards, four other frigates entered the port, and a broad

pendant, such as is borne by the commander of a naval armament, was

displayed from the Industry. Captain Farmer, of the Swift frigate, who

commanded the garrison, ordered the crew of the Swift to come on shore,

and assist in its defence; and directed captain Maltby to bring the

Favourite frigate, which he commanded, nearer to the land. The Spaniards

easily discovering the purpose of his motion, let him know, that if he

weighed his anchor, they would fire upon his ship; but, paying no regard

to these menaces, he advanced toward the shore. The Spanish fleet

followed, and two shots were fired, which fell at a distance from him.

He then sent to inquire the reason of such hostility, and was told, that

the shots were intended only as signals.

Both the English captains wrote, the next day, to Madariaga, the Spanish

commodore, warning him from the island, as from a place which the

English held by right of discovery.

Madariaga, who seems to have had no desire of unnecessary mischief,

invited them (June 9) to send an officer, who should take a view of his

forces, that they might be convinced of the vanity of resistance, and do

that, without compulsion, which he was, upon refusal, prepared to

enfcrce.

An officer was sent, who found sixteen hundred men, with a train of

twenty-seven cannon, four mortars, and two hundred bombs. The fleet

consisted of five frigates, from twenty to thirty guns, which were now

stationed opposite to the block-house.

He then sent them a formal memorial, in which he maintained his master's

right to the whole Magellanick region, and exhorted the English to

retire quietly from the settlement, which they could neither justify by

right, nor maintain by power.

He offered them the liberty of carrying away whatever they were desirous

to remove, and promised his receipt for what should be left, that no

loss might be suffered by them.

His propositions were expressed in terms of great civility; but he

concludes with demanding an answer in fifteen minutes.

Having, while he was writing, received the letters of warning, written

the day before by the English captains, he told them, that he thought

himself able to prove the king of Spain's title to all those countries,

but that this was no time for verbal altercations. He persisted in his

determination, and allowed only fifteen minutes for an answer.

To this it was replied, by captain Farmer, that though there had been

prescribed yet a shorter time, he should still resolutely defend his

charge; that this, whether menace or force, would be considered as an

insult on the British flag, and that satisfaction would certainly be

required.

On the next day, June 10, Madariaga landed his forces, and it may be

easily imagined, that he had no bloody conquest. The English had only a

wooden block-house, built at Woolwich, and carried in pieces to the

island, with a small battery of cannon. To contend with obstinacy had

been only to lavish life without use or hope, After the exchange of a

very few shots, a capitulation was proposed.

The Spanish commander acted with moderation; he exerted little of the

conqueror; what he had offered before the attack, he granted after the

victory; the English were allowed to leave the place with every honour,

only their departure was delayed, by the terms of the capitulation,

twenty days; and, to secure their stay, the rudder of the Favourite was

taken off. What they desired to carry away they removed without

molestation; and of what they left, an inventory was drawn, for which

the Spanish officer, by his receipt, promised to be accountable.

Of this petty revolution, so sudden and so distant, the English ministry

could not possibly have such notice, as might enable them to prevent it.

The conquest, if such it may be called, cost but three days; for the

Spaniards, either supposing the garrison stronger than it was, or

resolving to trust nothing to chance, or considering that, as their

force was greater, there was less dariger of bloodshed, came with a

power that made resistance ridiculous, and, at once, demanded and

obtained possession.

The first account of any discontent expressed by the Spaniards, was

brought by captain Hunt, who arriving at Plymouth, June 3, 1770,

informed the admiralty, that the island had been claimed in December, by

the governour of port Solidad.

This claim, made by an officer of so little dignity, without any known

direction from his superiours, could be considered only as the zeal or

officiousness of an individual, unworthy of publick notice, or the

formality of remonstrance.

In August, Mr. Harris, the resident at Madrid, gave notice to lord

Weymouth, of an account newly brought to Cadiz, that the English were in

possession of port Cuizada, the same which we call port Egmont, in the

Magellanick sea; that in January, they had warned away two Spanish

ships; and that an armament was sent out in May, from Buenos Ayres, to

dislodge them.

It was, perhaps, not yet certain, that this account was true; but the

information, however faithful, was too late for prevention. It was

easily known, that a fleet despatched in May, had, before August,

succeeded or miscarried.

In October, captain Maltby came to England, and gave the account which I

have now epitomised, of his expulsion from Falkland's islands.

From this moment, the whole nation can witness, that no time was lost.

The navy was surveyed, the ships refitted, and commanders appointed; and

a powerful fleet was assembled, well manned and well stored, with

expedition, after so long a peace, perhaps, never known before, and with

vigour, which, after the waste of so long a war, scarcely any other

nation had been capable of exerting.

This preparation, so illustrious in the eyes of Europe, and so

efficacious in its event, was obstructed by the utmost power of that

noisy faction, which has too long filled the kingdom, sometimes with the

roar of empty menace, and sometimes with the yell of hypocritical

lamentation. Every man saw, and every honest man saw with detestation,

that they who desired to force their sovereign into war, endeavoured, at

the same time, to disable him from action.

The vigour and spirit of the ministry easily broke through all the

machinations of these pygmy rebels, and our armament was quickly such as

was likely to make our negotiations effectual.

The prince of Masseran, in his first conference with the English

ministers on this occasion, owned that he had from Madrid received

intelligence, that the English had been forcibly expelled from

Falkland's island, by Buccarelli, the governour of Buenos Ayres, without

any particular orders from the king of Spain. But being asked, whether,

in his master's name, he disavowed Buccarelli's violence, he refused to

answer, without direction.

The scene of negotiation was now removed to Madrid, and, in September,

Mr. Harris was directed to demand, from Grimaldi, the Spanish minister,

the restitution of Falkland's island, and a disavowal of Buccarelli's

hostilities.

It was to be expected that Grimaldi would object to us our own

behaviour, who had ordered the Spaniards to depart from the same island.

To this it was replied, that the English forces were, indeed, directed

to warn other nations away; but, if compliance were refused, to proceed

quietly in making their settlement, and suffer the subjects, of whatever

power, to remain there without molestation. By possession thus taken,

there was only a disputable claim advanced, which might be peaceably and

regularly decided, without insult and without force; and, if the

Spaniards had complained at the British court, their reasons would have

been heard, and all injuries redressed; but that, by presupposing the

justice of their own title, and having recourse to arms, without any

previous notice or remonstrance, they had violated the peace, and

insulted the British government; and, therefore, it was expected, that

satisfaction should be made by publick disavowal, and immediate

restitution.

The answer of Grimaldi was ambiguous and cold. He did not allow that any

particular orders had been given for driving the English from their

settlement; but made no scruple of declaring, that such an ejection was

nothing more than the settlers might have expected; and that Buccarelli

had not, in his opinion, incurred any blame, as the general injunctions

to the American governours were to suffer no encroachments on the

Spanish dominions.

In October, the prince of Masseran proposed a convention, for the

accommodation of differences by mutual concessions, in which the warning

given to the Spaniards, by Hunt, should be disavowed on one side, and

the violence used by Buccarelli, on the other. This offer was

considered, as little less than a new insult, and Grimaldi was told,

that injury required reparation; that when either party had suffered

evident wrong, there was not the parity subsisting, which is implied in

conventions and contracts; that we considered ourselves as openly

insulted, and demanded satisfaction, plenary and unconditional.

Grimaldi affected to wonder, that we were not yet appeased by their

concessions. They had, he said, granted all that was required; they had

offered to restore the island in the state in which they found it; but

he thought that they, likewise, might hope for some regard, and that the

warning, sent by Hunt, would be disavowed.

Mr. Harris, our minister at Madrid, insisted, that the injured party had

a right to unconditional reparation, and Grimaldi delayed his answer,

that a council might be called. In a few days, orders were despatched to

prince Masseran, by which he was commissioned to declare the king of

Spain's readiness to satisfy the demands of the king of England, in

expectation of receiving from him reciprocal satisfaction, by the

disavowal, so often required, of Hunt's warning.

Finding the Spaniards disposed to make no other acknowledgments, the

English ministry considered a war as not likely to be long avoided. In

the latter end of November, private notice was given of their danger to

the merchants at Cadiz, and the officers, absent from Gibraltar, were

remanded to their posts. Our naval force was every day increased, and we

made no abatement of our original demand.

The obstinacy of the Spanish court still continued, and, about the end

of the year, all hope of reconciliation was so nearly extinguished, that

Mr. Harris was directed to withdraw, with the usual forms, from his

residence at Madrid.

Moderation is commonly firm, and firmness is commonly successful; having

not swelled our first requisition with any superfluous appendages, we

had nothing to yield, we, therefore, only repeated our first

proposition, prepared for war, though desirous of peace.

About this time, as is well known, the king of France dismissed Choiseul

from his employments. What effect this revolution of the French court

had upon the Spanish counsels, I pretend not to be informed. Choiseul

had always professed pacifick dispositions; nor is it certain, however

it may be suspected, that he talked in different strains to different

parties.

It seems to be almost the universal errour of historians to suppose it

politically, as it is physically true, that every effect has a

proportionate cause. In the inanimate action of matter upon matter, the

motion produced can be but equal to the force of the moving power; but

the operations of life, whether private or publick, admit no such laws.

The caprices of voluntary agents laugh at calculation. It is not always

that there is a strong reason for a great event. Obstinacy and

flexibility, malignity and kindness, give place, alternately, to each

other; and the reason of these vicissitudes, however important may be

the consequences, often escapes the mind in which the change is made.

Whether the alteration, which began in January to appear in the Spanish

counsels, had any other cause than conviction of the impropriety of

their past conduct, and of the danger of a new war, it is not easy to

decide; but they began, whatever was the reason, to relax their

haughtiness, and Mr. Harris's departure was countermanded.

The demands first made by England were still continued, and on January

22d, the prince of Masseran delivered a declaration, in which the king

of Spain "disavows the violent enterprise of Buccarelli," and promises

"to restore the port and fort called Egmont, with all the artillery and

stores, according to the inventory."

To this promise of restitution is subjoined, that "this engagement to

restore port Egmont cannot, nor ought, in any wise, to affect the

question of the prior right of sovereignty of the _Malouine_, otherwise

called Falkland's islands."

This concession was accepted by the earl of Rochford, who declared, on

the part of his master, that the prince of Masseran, being authorized by

his catholick majesty, "to offer, in his majesty's name, to the king of

Great Britain, a satisfaction for the injury done him, by dispossessing

him of port Egmont;" and, having signed a declaration, expressing that

his catholick majesty "disavows the expedition against port Egmont, and

engages to restore it, in the state in which it stood before the 10th of

June, 1770, his Britannick majesty will look upon the said declaration,

together with the full performance of the engagement on the part of his

catholick majesty, as a satisfaction for the injury done to the crown of

Great Britain."

This is all that was originally demanded. The expedition is disavowed,

and the island is restored. An injury is acknowledged by the reception

of lord Rochford's paper, who twice mentions the word _injury_, and

twice the word _satisfaction_.

The Spaniards have stipulated, that the grant of possession shall not

preclude the question of prior right, a question which we shall probably

make no haste to discuss, and a right, of which no formal resignation

was ever required. This reserve has supplied matter for much clamour,

and, perhaps the English ministry would have been better pleased had the

declaration been without it. But when we have obtained all that was

asked, why should we complain that we have not more? When the possession

is conceded, where is the evil that the right, which that concession

supposes to be merely hypothetical, is referred to the Greek calends for

a future disquisition? Were the Switzers less free, or less secure,

because, after their defection from the house of Austria, they had never

been declared independent before the treaty of Westphalia? Is the king

of France less a sovereign, because the king of England partakes his

title?

If sovereignty implies undisputed right, scarce any prince is a

sovereign through his whole dominions; if sovereignty consists in this,

that no superiour is acknowledged, our king reigns at port Egmont with

sovereign authority. Almost every new-acquired territory is, in some

degree, controvertible, and till the controversy is decided, a term very

difficult to be fixed, all that can be had is real possession and actual

dominion.

This, surely, is a sufficient answer to the feudal gabble of a man, who

is every day lessening that splendour of character which once

illuminated the kingdom, then dazzled, and afterwards inflamed it; and

for whom it will be happy if the nation shall, at last, dismiss him to

nameless obscurity, with that equipoise of blame and praise which

Corneille allows to Richelieu, a man who, I think, had much of his

merit, and many of his faults:

"Chacun parle à son gré de ce grand cardinal;

Mais, pour moi, je n'en dirai rien:

Il m'a fait trop de bien pour en dire du mal;

Il m'a fait trop de mal pour en dire du bien."

To push advantages too far is neither generous nor just. Had we insisted

on a concession of antecedent right, it may not misbecome us, either as

moralists or politicians, to consider what Grimaldi could have answered.

We have already, he might say, granted you the whole effect of right,

and have not denied you the name. We have not said, that the right was

ours before this concession, but only that what right we had, is not, by

this concession, vacated. We have now, for more than two centuries,

ruled large tracts of the American continent, by a claim which, perhaps,

is valid only upon this consideration, that no power can produce a

better; by the right of discovery, and prior settlement. And by such

titles almost all the dominions of the earth are holden, except that

their original is beyond memory, and greater obscurity gives them

greater veneration. Should we allow this plea to be annulled, the whole

fabrick of our empire shakes at the foundation. When you suppose

yourselves to have first descried the disputed island, you suppose what

you can hardly prove. We were, at least, the general discoverers of the

Magellanick region, and have hitherto held it with all its adjacencies.

The justice of this tenure the world has, hitherto, admitted, and

yourselves, at least, tacitly allowed it, when, about twenty years ago,

you desisted from your purposed expedition, and expressly disowned any

design of settling, where you are now not content to settle and to

reign, without extorting such a confession of original right, as may

invite every other nation to follow you.

To considerations such as these, it is reasonable to impute that anxiety

of the Spaniards, from which the importance of this island is inferred

by Junius, one of the few writers of his despicable faction, whose name

does not disgrace the page of an opponent. The value of the thing

disputed may be very different to him that gains and him that loses it.

The Spaniards, by yielding Falkland's island, have admitted a precedent

of what they think encroachment; have suffered a breach to be made in

the outworks of their empire; and, notwithstanding the reserve of prior

right, have suffered a dangerous exception to the prescriptive tenure of

their American territories.

Such is the loss of Spain; let us now compute the profit of Britain. We

have, by obtaining a disavowal of Buccarelli's expedition, and a

restitution of our settlement, maintained the honour of the crown, and

the superiority of our influence. Beyond this what have we acquired?

What, but a bleak and gloomy solitude, an island, thrown aside from

human use, stormy in winter, and barren in summer; an island, which not

the southern savages have dignified with habitation; where a garrison

must be kept in a state that contemplates with envy the exiles of

Siberia; of which the expense will be perpetual, and the use only

occasional; and which, if fortune smile upon our labours, may become a

nest of smugglers in peace, and in war the refuge of future bucaniers.

To all this the government has now given ample attestation, for the

island has been since abandoned, and, perhaps, was kept only to quiet

clamours, with an intention, not then wholly concealed, of quitting it

in a short time.

This is the country of which we have now possession, and of which a

numerous party pretends to wish that we had murdered thousands for the

titular sovereignty. To charge any men with such madness approaches to

an accusation defeated by its own incredibility. As they have been long

accumulating falsehoods, it is possible that they are now only adding

another to the heap, and that they do not mean all that they profess.

But of this faction what evil may not be credited? They have hitherto

shown no virtue, and very little wit, beyond that mischievous cunning

for which it is held, by Hale, that children may be hanged!

As war is the last of remedies, "cuncta prius tentanda," all lawful

expedients must be used to avoid it. As war is the extremity of evil, it

is, surely, the duty of those, whose station intrusts them with the care

of nations, to avert it from their charge. There are diseases of animal

nature, which nothing but amputation can remove; so there may, by the

depravation of human passions, be sometimes a gangrene in collective

life, for which fire and the sword are the necessary remedies; but in

what can skill or caution be better shown, than preventing such dreadful

operations, while there is yet room for gentler methods!

It is wonderful with what coolness and indifference the greater part of

mankind see war commenced. Those that hear of it at a distance, or read

of it in books, but have never presented its evils to their minds,

consider it as little more than a splendid game, a proclamation, an

army, a battle, and a triumph. Some, indeed, must perish in the most

successful field, but they die upon the bed of honour, "resign their

lives amidst the joys of conquest, and, filled with England's glory,

smile in death."

The life of a modern soldier is ill represented by heroick fiction. War

has means of destruction more formidable than the cannon and the sword.

Of the thousands and ten thousands, that perished in our late contests

with France and Spain, a very small part ever felt the stroke of an

enemy; the rest languished in tents and ships, amidst damps and

putrefaction; pale, torpid, spiritless, and helpless; gasping and

groaning, unpitied among men, made obdurate by long continuance of

hopeless misery; and were, at last, whelmed in pits, or heaved into the

ocean, without notice and without remembrance. By incommodious

encampments and unwholesome stations, where courage is useless, and

enterprise impracticable, fleets are silently dispeopled, and armies

sluggishly melted away.

Thus is a people gradually exhausted, for the most part, with little

effect. The wars of civilized nations make very slow changes in the

system of empire. The publick perceives scarcely any alteration, but an

increase of debt; and the few individuals who are benefited are not

supposed to have the clearest right to their advantages. If he that

shared the danger enjoyed the profit, and, after bleeding in the battle,

grew rich by the victory, he might show his gains without envy. But, at

the conclusion of a ten years' war, how are we recompensed for the death

of multitudes, and the expense of millions, but by contemplating the

sudden glories of paymasters and agents, contractors and commissaries,

whose equipages shine like meteors, and whose palaces rise like

exhalations!

These are the men who, without virtue, labour, or hazard, are growing

rich, as their country is impoverished; they rejoice, when obstinacy or

ambition adds another year to slaughter and devastation; and laugh, from

their desks, at bravery and science, while they are adding figure to

figure, and cipher to cipher, hoping for a new contract from a new

armament, and computing the profits of a siege or tempest.

Those who suffer their minds to dwell on these considerations, will

think it no great crime in the ministry, that they have not snatched,

with eagerness, the first opportunity of rushing into the field, when

they were able to obtain, by quiet negotiation, all the real good that

victory could have brought us.

Of victory, indeed, every nation is confident before the sword is drawn;

and this mutual confidence produces that wantonness of bloodshed, that

has so often desolated the world. But it is evident, that of

contradictory opinions, one must be wrong; and the history of mankind

does not want examples, that may teach caution to the daring, and

moderation to the proud.

Let us not think our laurels blasted by condescending to inquire,

whether we might not possibly grow rather less than greater by attacking

Spain. Whether we should have to contend with Spain alone, whatever has

been promised by our patriots, may very reasonably be doubted. A war

declared for the empty sound of an ancient title to a Magellanick rock,

would raise the indignation of the earth against us. These encroachers

on the waste of nature, says our ally the Russian, if they succeed in

their first effort of usurpation, will make war upon us for a title to

Kamtschatka. These universal settlers, says our ally the Dane, will, in

a short time, settle upon Greenland, and a fleet will batter Copenhagen,

till we are willing to confess, that it always was their own.

In a quarrel, like this, it is not possible that any power should favour

us, and it is very likely that some would oppose us. The French, we are

told, are otherwise employed: the contests between the king of France,

and his own subjects, are sufficient to withhold him from supporting

Spain. But who does not know that a foreign war has often put a stop to

civil discords? It withdraws the attention of the publick from domestick

grievances, and affords opportunities of dismissing the turbulent and

restless to distant employments. The Spaniards have always an argument

of irresistible persuasion: if France will not support them against

England, they will strengthen England against France.

But let us indulge a dream of idle speculation, and suppose that we are

to engage with Spain, and with Spain alone; it is not even yet very

certain that much advantage will be gained. Spain is not easily

vulnerable; her kingdom, by the loss or cession of many fragments of

dominion, is become solid and compact. The Spaniards have, indeed, no

fleet able to oppose us, but they will not endeavour actual opposition:

they will shut themselves up in their own territories, and let us

exhaust our seamen in a hopeless siege: they will give commissions to

privateers of every nation, who will prey upon our merchants without

possibility of reprisal. If they think their Plata fleet in danger, they

will forbid it to set sail, and live awhile upon the credit of treasure

which all Europe knows to be safe; and which, if our obstinacy should

continue till they can no longer be without it, will be conveyed to them

with secrecy and security, by our natural enemies the French, or by the

Dutch our natural allies.

But the whole continent of Spanish America will lie open to invasion; we

shall have nothing to do but march into these wealthy regions, and make

their present masters confess, that they were always ours by ancient

right. We shall throw brass and iron out of our houses, and nothing but

silver will be seen among us.

All this is very desirable, but it is not certain that it can be easily

attained. Large tracts of America were added, by the last war, to the

British dominions; but, if the faction credit their own Apollo, they

were conquered in Germany. They, at best, are only the barren parts of

the continent, the refuse of the earlier adventurers, which the French,

who came last, had taken only as better than nothing.

Against the Spanish dominions we have never, hitherto, been able to do

much. A few privateers have grown rich at their expense, but no scheme

of conquest has yet been successful. They are defended, not by walls

mounted with cannons, which by cannons may be battered, but by the

storms of the deep, and the vapours of the land, by the flames of

calenture and blasts of pestilence.

In the reign of Elizabeth, the favourite period of English greatness, no

enterprises against America had any other consequence than that of

extending English navigation. Here Cavendish perished, after all his

hazards; and here Drake and Hawkins, great as they were in knowledge and

in fame, having promised honour to themselves, and dominion to the

country, sunk by desperation and misery in dishonourable graves.

During the protectorship of Cromwell, a time of which the patriotick

tribes still more ardently desire the return, the Spanish dominions were

again attempted; but here, and only here, the fortune of Cromwell made a

pause. His forces were driven from Hispaniola; his hopes of possessing

the West Indies vanished; and Jamaica was taken, only that the whole

expedition might not grow ridiculous.

The attack of Carthagena is yet remembered, where the Spaniards, from

the ramparts, saw their invaders destroyed by the hostility of the

elements, poisoned by the air, and crippled by the dews; where every

hour swept away battalions; and, in the three days that passed between

the descent and reembarkation, half an army perished.

In the last war the Havanna was taken; at what expense is too well

remembered. May my country be never cursed with such another conquest!

These instances of miscarriage, and these arguments of difficulty, may,

perhaps, abate the military ardour of the publick. Upon the opponents of

the government their operation will be different; they wish for war, but

not for conquest; victory would defeat their purposes equally with

peace, because prosperity would naturally continue the trust in those

hands which had used it fortunately. The patriots gratified themselves

with expectations that some sinistrous accident, or erroneous conduct,

might diffuse discontent, and inflame malignity. Their hope is

malevolence, and their good is evil.

Of their zeal for their country we have already had a specimen. While

they were terrifying the nation with doubts, whether it was any longer

to exist; while they represented invasive armies as hovering in the

clouds, and hostile fleets, as emerging from the deeps; they obstructed

our levies of seamen, and embarrassed our endeavours of defence. Of such

men he thinks with unnecessary candour who does not believe them likely

to have promoted the miscarriage, which they desired, by intimidating

our troops, or betraying our counsels.

It is considered as an injury to the publick, by those sanguinary

statesmen, that though the fleet has been refitted and manned, yet no

hostilities have followed; and they, who sat wishing for misery and

slaughter, are disappointed of their pleasure. But as peace is the end

of war, it is the end, likewise, of preparations for war; and he may be

justly hunted down, as the enemy of mankind, that can choose to snatch,

by violence and bloodshed, what gentler means can equally obtain.

The ministry are reproached, as not daring to provoke an enemy, lest ill

success should discredit and displace them. I hope that they had better

reasons; that they paid some regard to equity and humanity; and

considered themselves as intrusted with the safety of their

fellow-subjects, and as the destroyers of all that should be

superfluously slaughtered. But let us suppose, that their own safety had

some influence on their conduct, they will not, however, sink to a level

with their enemies. Though the motive might be selfish, the act was

innocent. They, who grow rich by administering physick, are not to be

numbered with them that get money by dispensing poison. If they maintain

power by harmlessness and peace, they must for ever be at a great

distance from ruffians, who would gain it by mischief and confusion. The

watch of a city may guard it for hire; but are well employed in

protecting it from those, who lie in wait to fire the streets, and rob

the houses, amidst the conflagration.

An unsuccessful war would, undoubtedly, have had the effect which the

enemies of the ministry so earnestly desire; for who could have

sustained the disgrace of folly ending in misfortune? But had wanton

invasion undeservedly prospered, had Falkland's island been yielded

unconditionally, with every right, prior and posterior; though the

rabble might have shouted, and the windows have blazed, yet those who

know the value of life, and the uncertainty of publick credit, would

have murmured, perhaps unheard, at the increase of our debt, and the

loss of our people.

This thirst of blood, however the visible promoters of sedition may

think it convenient to shrink from the accusation, is loudly avowed by

Junius, the writer to whom his party owes much of its pride, and some of

its popularity. Of Junius it cannot be said, as of Ulysses, that he

scatters ambiguous expressions among the vulgar; for he cries havock,

without reserve, and endeavours to let slip the dogs of foreign or of

civil war, ignorant whither they are going, and careless what may be

their prey.

Junius has sometimes made his satire felt, but let not injudicious

admiration mistake the venom of the shaft for the vigour of the bow. He

has sometimes sported with lucky malice; but to him that knows his

company, it is not hard to be sarcastick in a mask. While he walks, like

Jack the giant-killer, in a coat of darkness, he may do much mischief

with little strength. Novelty captivates the superficial and

thoughtless; vehemence delights the discontented and turbulent. He that

contradicts acknowledged truth will always have an audience; he that

vilifies established authority will always find abettors.

Junius burst into notice with a blaze of impudence which has rarely

glared upon the world before, and drew the rabble after him, as a

monster makes a show. When he had once provided for his safety, by

impenetrable secrecy, he had nothing to combat but truth and justice,

enemies whom he knows to be feeble in the dark. Being then at liberty to

indulge himself in all the immunities of invisibility; out of the reach

of danger, he has been bold; out of the reach of shame, he has been

confident. As a rhetorician, he has had the art of persuading, when he

seconded desire; as a reasoner, he has convinced those who had no doubt

before; as a moralist, he has taught, that virtue may disgrace; and, as

a patriot, he has gratified the mean by insults on the high. Finding

sedition ascendant, he has been able to advance it; finding the nation

combustible, he has been able to inflame it. Let us abstract from his

wit the vivacity of insolence, and withdraw from his efficacy the

sympathetick favour of plebeian malignity; I do not say that we shall

leave him nothing; the cause that I defend, scorns the help of

falsehood; but if we leave him only his merit, what will be his praise?

It is not by his liveliness of imagery, his pungency of periods, or his

fertility of allusion, that he detains the cits of London, and the boors

of Middlesex. Of style and sentiment they take no cognizance. They

admire him, for virtues like their own, for contempt of order, and

violence of outrage; for rage of defamation, and audacity of falsehood.

The supporters of the bill of rights feel no niceties of composition,

nor dexterities of sophistry; their faculties are better proportioned to

the bawl of Bellas, or barbarity of Beckford; but they are told, that

Junius is on their side, and they are, therefore, sure that Junius is

infallible. Those who know not whither he would lead them, resolve to

follow him; and those who cannot find his meaning, hope he means

rebellion.

Junius is an unusual phenomenon, on which some have gazed with wonder,

and some with terrour, but wonder and terrour are transitory passions.

He will soon be more closely viewed, or more attentively examined; and

what folly has taken for a comet, that from its flaming hair shook

pestilence and war, inquiry will find to be only a meteor, formed by the

vapours of putrefying democracy, and kindled into flame by the

effervescence of interest, struggling with conviction; which, after

having plunged its followers in a bog, will leave us, inquiring why we

regard it.

Yet, though I cannot think the style of Junius secure from criticism,

though his expressions are often trite, and his periods feeble, I should

never have stationed him where he has placed himself, had I not rated

him by his morals rather than his faculties. What, says Pope, must be

the priest, where a monkey is the god? What must be the drudge of a

party, of which the heads are Wilkes and Crosby, Sawbridge and Townsend?

Junius knows his own meaning, and can, therefore, tell it. He is an

enemy to the ministry; he sees them growing hourly stronger. He knows

that a war, at once unjust and unsuccessful, would have certainly

displaced them, and is, therefore, in his zeal for his country, angry

that war was not unjustly made, and unsuccessfully conducted. But there

are others whose thoughts are less clearly expressed, and whose schemes,

perhaps, are less consequentially digested; who declare that they do not

wish for a rupture, yet condemn the ministry for not doing that, by

which a rupture would naturally have been made.

If one party resolves to demand what the other resolves to refuse, the

dispute can be determined only by arbitration; and between powers who

have no common superiour, there is no other arbitrator than the sword.

Whether the ministry might not equitably have demanded more is not worth

a question. The utmost exertion of right is always invidious, and, where

claims are not easily determinable, is always dangerous. We asked all

that was necessary, and persisted in our first claim, without mean

recession, or wanton aggravation. The Spaniards found us resolute, and

complied, after a short struggle.

The real crime of the ministry is, that they have found the means of

avoiding their own ruin; but the charge against them is multifarious and

confused, as will happen, when malice and discontent are ashamed of

their complaint. The past and the future are complicated in the censure.

We have heard a tumultuous clamour about honour and rights, injuries and

insults, the British flag and the Favourite's rudder, Buccarelli's

conduct and Grimaldi's declarations, the Manilla ransome, delays and

reparation.

Through the whole argument of the faction runs the general errour, that

our settlement on Falkland's island was not only lawful, but

unquestionable; that our right was not only certain, but acknowledged;

and that the equity of our conduct was such, that the Spaniards could

not blame or obstruct it, without combating their own conviction, and

opposing the general opinion of mankind.

If once it be discovered that, in the opinion of the Spaniards, our

settlement was usurped, our claim arbitrary, and our conduct insolent,

all that has happened will appear to follow by a natural concatenation.

Doubts will produce disputes and disquisition; disquisition requires

delay, and delay causes inconvenience.

Had the Spanish government immediately yielded, unconditionally, all

that was required, we might have been satisfied; but what would Europe

have judged of their submission? that they shrunk before us, as a

conquered people, who, having lately yielded to our arms, were now

compelled to sacrifice to our pride. The honour of the publick is,

indeed, of high importance; but we must remember, that we have had to

transact with a mighty king and a powerful nation, who have unluckily

been taught to think, that they have honour to keep or lose, as well as

ourselves.

When the admiralty were told, in June, of the warning given to Hunt,

they were, I suppose, informed that Hunt had first provoked it by

warning away the Spaniards, and naturally considered one act of

insolence as balanced by another, without expecting that more would be

done on either side. Of representations and remonstrances there would be

no end, if they were to be made whenever small commanders are uncivil to

each other; nor could peace ever be enjoyed, if, upon such transient

provocations, it be imagined necessary to prepare for war. We might

then, it is said, have increased our force with more leisure and less

inconvenience; but this is to judge only by the event. We omitted to

disturb the publick, because we did not suppose that an armament would

be necessary.

Some months afterwards, as has been told, Buccarelli, the governour of

Buenos Ayres, sent against the settlement of port Egmont a force which

ensured the conquest. The Spanish commander required the English

captains to depart, but they, thinking that resistance necessary, which

they knew to be useless, gave the Spaniards the right of prescribing

terms of capitulation. The Spaniards imposed no new condition, except

that the sloop should not sail under twenty days; and of this they

secured the performance by taking off the rudder.

To an inhabitant of the land there appears nothing in all this

unreasonable or offensive. If the English intended to keep their

stipulation, how were they injured by the detention of the rudder? If

the rudder be to a ship, what his tail is in fables to a fox, the part

in which honour is placed, and of which the violation is never to be

endured, I am sorry that the Favourite suffered an indignity, but cannot

yet think it a cause for which nations should slaughter one another.

When Buccarelli's invasion was known, and the dignity of the crown

infringed, we demanded reparation and prepared for war, and we gained

equal respect by the moderation of our terms, and the spirit of our

exertion. The Spanish minister immediately denied that Buccarelli had

received any particular orders to seize port Egmont, nor pretended that

he was justified, otherwise than by the general instructions by which

the American governours are required to exclude the subjects of other

powers.

To have inquired whether our settlement at port Egmont was any violation

of the Spanish rights, had been to enter upon a discussion, which the

pertinacity of political disputants might have continued without end.

We, therefore, called for restitution, not as a confession of right, but

as a reparation of honour, which required that we should be restored to

our former state upon the island, and that the king of Spain should

disavow the action of his governour.

In return to this demand, the Spaniards expected from us a disavowal of

the menaces, with which they had been first insulted by Hunt; and if the

claim to the island be supposed doubtful, they certainly expected it

with equal reason. This, however, was refused, and our superiority of

strength gave validity to our arguments.

But we are told, that the disavowal of the king of Spain is temporary

and fallacious; that Buccarelli's armament had all the appearance of

regular forces and a concerted expedition; and that he is not treated at

home as a man guilty of piracy, or as disobedient to the orders of his

master.

That the expedition was well planned, and the forces properly supplied,

affords no proof of communication between the governour and his court.

Those who are intrusted with the care of kingdoms in another hemisphere,

must always be trusted with power to defend them.

As little can be inferred from his reception at the Spanish court. He is

not punished, indeed; for what has he done that deserves punishment? He

was sent into America to govern and defend the dominions of Spain. He

thought the English were encroaching, and drove them away. No Spaniard

thinks that he has exceeded his duty, nor does the king of Spain charge

him with excess. The boundaries of dominion, in that part of the world,

have not yet been settled; and he mistook, if a mistake there was, like

a zealous subject, in his master's favour.

But all this inquiry is superfluous. Considered as a reparation of

honour, the disavowal of the king of Spain, made in the sight of all

Europe, is of equal value, whether true or false. There is, indeed, no

reason to question its veracity; they, however, who do not believe it,

must allow the weight of that influence, by which a great prince is

reduced to disown his own commission.

But the general orders, upon which the governour is acknowledged to have

acted, are neither disavowed _nor_ explained. Why the Spaniards should

disavow the defence of their own territories, the warmest disputant will

find it difficult to tell; and, if by an explanation is meant an

accurate delineation of the southern empire, and the limitation of their

claims beyond the line, it cannot be imputed to any very culpable

remissness, that what has been denied for two centuries to the European

powers, was not obtained in a hasty wrangle about a petty settlement.

The ministry were too well acquainted with negotiation to fill their

heads with such idle expectations. The question of right was

inexplicable and endless. They left it, as it stood. To be restored to

actual possession was easily practicable. This restoration they required

and obtained.

But they should, say their opponents, have insisted upon more; they

should have exacted not only, reparation of our honour, but repayment of

our expense. Nor are they all satisfied with the recovery of the costs

and damages of the present contest; they are for taking this opportunity

of calling in old debts, and reviving our right to the ransome of

Manilla.

The Manilla ransome has, I think, been most mentioned by the inferiour

bellowers of sedition. Those who lead the faction know that it cannot be

remembered much to their advantage. The followers of lord Rockingham

remember, that his ministry began and ended without obtaining it; the

adherents to Grenville would be told, that he could never be taught to

understand our claim. The law of nations made little of his knowledge.

Let him not, however, be depreciated in his grave. If he was sometimes

wrong, he was often right. [29]

Of reimbursement the talk has been more confident, though not more

reasonable. The expenses of war have been often desired, have been

sometimes required, but were never paid; or never, but when resistance

was hopeless, and there remained no choice between submission and

destruction.

Of our late equipments, I know not from whom the charge can be very

properly expected. The king of Spain disavows the violence which

provoked us to arm, and for the mischiefs, which he did not do, why

should he pay? Buccarelli, though he had learned all the arts of an

East Indian governour, could hardly have collected, at Buenos Ayres, a

sum sufficient to satisfy our demands. If he be honest, he is hardly

rich; and if he be disposed to rob, he has the misfortune of being

placed, where robbers have been before him.

The king of Spain, indeed, delayed to comply with our proposals, and our

armament was made necessary by unsatisfactory answers and dilatory

debates. The delay certainly increased our expenses, and, it is not

unlikely, that the increase of our expenses put an end to the delay.

But this is the inevitable process of human affairs. Negotiation

requires time, What is not apparent to intuition must be found by

inquiry. Claims that have remained doubtful for ages cannot be settled

in a day. Reciprocal complaints are not easily adjusted, but by

reciprocal compliance. The Spaniards, thinking themselves entitled to

the island, and injured by captain Hunt, in their turn demanded

satisfaction, which was refused; and where is the wonder, if their

concessions were delayed! They may tell us, that an independent nation

is to be influenced not by command, but by persuasion; that, if we

expect our proposals to be received without deliberation, we assume that

sovereignty which they do not grant us; and that if we arm, while they

are deliberating, we must indulge our martial ardour at our own charge.

The English ministry asked all that was reasonable, and enforced all

that they asked. Our national honour is advanced, and our interest, if

any interest we have, is sufficiently secured. There can be none amongst

us, to whom this transaction does not seem happily concluded, but those

who, having fixed their hopes on publick calamities, sat, like vultures,

waiting for a day of carnage. Having worn out all the arts of domestick

sedition, having wearied violence, and exhausted falsehood, they yet

flattered themselves with some assistance from the pride or malice of

Spain; and when they could no longer make the people complain of

grievances, which they did not feel, they had the comfort yet of

knowing, that real evils were possible, and their resolution is well

known of charging all evil on their governours.

The reconciliation was, therefore, considered as the loss of their last

anchor; and received not only with the fretfulness of disappointment,

but the rage of desperation. When they found that all were happy, in

spite of their machinations, and the soft effulgence of peace shone out

upon the nation, they felt no motion but that of sullen envy; they could

not, like Milton's prince of hell, abstract themselves a moment from

their evil; as they have not the wit of Satan, they have not his virtue;

they tried, once again, what could be done by sophistry without art, and

confidence without credit. They represented their sovereign as

dishonoured, and their country as betrayed, or, in their fiercer

paroxysms of fury, reviled their sovereign as betraying it.

Their pretences I have here endeavoured to expose, by showing, that more

than has been yielded, was not to be expected, that more, perhaps, was

not to be desired, and that, if all had been refused, there had scarcely

been an adequate reason for a war.

There was, perhaps, never much danger of war, or of refusal, but what

danger there was, proceeded from the faction. Foreign nations,

unacquainted with the insolence of common councils, and unaccustomed to

the howl of plebeian patriotism, when they heard of rabbles and riots,

of petitions and remonstrances, of discontent in Surrey, Derbyshire, and

Yorkshire; when they saw the chain of subordination broken, and the

legislature threatened and defied, naturally imagined, that such a

government had little leisure for Falkland's island; they supposed that

the English, when they returned ejected from port Egmont, would find

Wilkes invested with the protectorate, or see the mayor of London, what

the French have formerly seen their mayors of the palace, the commander

of the army, and tutor of the king; that they would be called to tell

their tale before the common council; and that the world was to expect

war or peace from a vote of the subscribers to the bill of rights.

But our enemies have now lost their hopes, and our friends, I hope, are

recovered from their fears. To fancy that our government can be

subverted by the rabble, whom its lenity has pampered into impudence, is

to fear that a city may be drowned by the overflowing of its kennels.

The distemper which cowardice or malice thought either decay of the

vitals, or resolution of the nerves, appears, at last, to have been

nothing more than a political _phtheiriasis_, a disease too loathsome

for a plainer name, but the effect of negligence rather than of

weakness, and of which the shame is greater than the danger.

Among the disturbers of our quiet are some animals of greater bulk, whom

their power of roaring persuaded us to think formidable; but we now

perceive that sound and force do not always go together. The noise of a

savage proves nothing but his hunger.

After all our broils, foreign and domestick, we may, at last, hope to

remain awhile in quiet, amused with the view of our own success. We have

gained political strength, by the increase of our reputation; we have

gained real strength, by the reparation of our navy; we have shown

Europe, that ten years of war have not yet exhausted us; and we have

enforced our settlement on an island on which, twenty years ago, we

durst not venture to look.

These are the gratifications only of honest minds; but there is a time,

in which hope comes to all. From the present happiness of the publick,

the patriots themselves may derive advantage. To be harmless, though by

impotence, obtains some degree of kindness: no man hates a worm as he

hates a viper; they were once dreaded enough to be detested, as serpents

that could bite; they have now shown that they can only hiss, and may,

therefore, quietly slink into holes, and change their slough, unmolested

and forgotten.

The Works of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. in Eleven Volumes, Volume 06 Reviews, Political Tracts, and Lives of Eminent Persons · 第 47 / 72 题