I know several fine things about the famous songster:

"In the golden lightning

Of the sunken sun,

O'er which clouds are bright'ning,

Thou dost float and run,

Like an unbodied joy whose race is just begun."

An "unbodied joy!" That's a hit, surely!

Here is Browning on the thrush, which I think should be to the lark:

"He sings each song twice over,

Lest you should think he never could recapture

The first fine careless rapture."

The third is just thrown in by the prodigal hand of genius in a poem not

to a lark but to a daisy:

"Alas! it's no thy neebor sweet,

The bonnie lark, companion meet,

Bending thee 'mang the dewy weet,

Wi' speckl'd breast,

When upward springing, blithe, to greet

The purpling east."

How fine is Wordsworth's well known tribute:

"Type of the wise, who soar but never roam,

True to the kindred points of Heaven and Home!"

And now I remember Shakespeare has his say too about the lark--what is

it in England he has not his say about? or in all the world for that

matter; and how much and how many things has he rendered it the highest

wisdom for men to keep silent about after he has said his say, holding

their peace forever.

[Sidenote: _Reading Abbey._]

A row upon the silver Thames after luncheon, and we are off again for

Reading, where we are to rest over night at the Queen's. Reading has a

pretty, new park and interesting ruins within its boundaries which we

visited before dinner. There are but few traces left of the once famous

Abbey, founded early in the twelfth century by Henry I. In the height of

its prosperity more than two hundred monks fattened at its hospitable

board, and its mitred abbot sat as a peer in Parliament. It was noted,

too, as a centre of learning, but the jolly brethren must have sadly

degenerated in this respect, if we can believe the report of the royal

commissioners in temp. Henry VIII., for Hugh Cook, the last abbot, who

was hanged and quartered near his own door in 1539, is described as a

"stubborn monk, absolutely without learning." But, of course, all who

believe that the much-married Henry was a monster of iniquity will put

no faith in the reports of his minions, and will continue to believe

that Abbot Hugh was a holy man of God, whose shortcomings in the small

matters of orthography and syntax were more than made up by his

proficiency in vigils, fastings, and prayers. That he was the "right

man in the right place" is proven by the inventory of the relics found

in his keeping by the aforesaid minions at the time of the suppression

of the monastery. Among these sacred objects were "twoo peces of the

holye crosse," "Saynt James hande," "a bone of Marye Magdelene," "a pece

of Saynt Pancrat' arme," and "a bone of Saynt Edwarde the martyr is

arme." Can it be possible that this saintly man, who so zealously

guarded such treasures to the last moment of his life, should still be

allowed to suffer under the imputation of stubbornness and ignorance! He

mightn't just have been "one of those literary fellers," but it is very

clear he had a firm grasp of the "fundamentals" of the faith. What is

learning compared to a "bone of Saynt Edwarde" as a means of keeping the

sheep in the true fold! The old abbot knew his business better than

Henry's commissioners. The tooth of Buddha, which I went to see when in

Ceylon, draws crowds from all parts of the island, and excites more

piety than the tom-tom, or the incantations of the most learned priest.

Truly there's nothing like a relic as a means of grace.

A pretty lawn in the rear of our hotel gave us an opportunity for a game

of lawn tennis in the twilight after dinner, and in the morning we were

off for Oxford. The editorial in the Reading paper that morning upon

emigration struck me as going to the root of the matter. Here is the

concluding paragraph:

"Already the expanding and prospering industries of the New World are

throwing an ominous shadow across the Old World and are affecting some

of its habits and practices. But over and above and beyond all these,

the free thought, the liberty of action, the calm independence and the

sense of the dignity of man as man, and the perfect equality of all

before the law and in the eye of the constitution now existing in

America, are developing a race of men who, through correspondence with

home relations, the intercourse of free travel, the transaction of

business, and the free, outspoken language of the press, are gradually

disintegrating the yet strong conservative forces of European society,

and thus preparing the downfall of the monarchical, aristocratic,

military, and ecclesiastic systems which shackle and strangle the people

of the Old World. These thoughts seem to me to convey the meaning of the

great exodus now going on, and he is a wise statesman who reads the

lesson aright."

There's a man after my own heart. He grasps the subject.

[Sidenote: _Causes of Emigration._]

The editor tells one of the several causes of the exodus which is

embracing many of the most valuable citizens of the old lands where

class distinctions still linger. Man longs not only to be free but to be

equal, if he has much manhood in him; and that America is the home for

such men, numbers of the best are fast finding out. But England will

soon march forward; she is not going to rest behind very long. There

will soon be no superior political advantages here for the masses, nor

educational ones either. England is at work in earnest, and what she

does, she does well. I prophecy that young England will give young

America a hard race for supremacy.

Some of us walked ahead of the coach for several miles, and I had a chat

with a man whom we met. He was a rough carpenter and his wages were

sixteen shillings per week ($4). A laborer gets eleven shillings (not

$2.75), but some "good masters" pay thirteen to fourteen shillings

($3.25 to $3.50), and give their men four or five pounds of beef at

Christmas. Food is bacon and tea, which are cheap, but no beef. Men's

wages have not advanced much for many years (I should think not!), but

women's have. An ordinary woman for field work can get one shilling per

day (24 cents); a short time ago ninepence (18 cents) was the highest

amount paid. Is it not cheering to find poor women getting an advance?

But think what their condition still is, when one shilling per day is

considered good pay! I asked whether employers did not board the workers

in addition to paying these wages, but he assured me they did not. This

is southern England and these are agricultural laborers, but the wages

seem distressingly low even as compared with British wages in general.

The new system of education and the coming extension of the suffrage to

the counties will soon work a change among these poor people. They will

not rest content crowding each other down thus to a pittance when they

can read and write and vote. Thank fortune for this.

Our ladies were unusually gay in their decorations to-day, with bunches

of wild flowers on their breasts and hats crowned with poppies and

roses. They decked the Queen Dowager out until she looked as if ready to

play Ophelia. Their smiles too were as pretty as their flowers. What an

embodied joy bright, happy ladies are under all conditions, and how

absolutely essential for a coaching party! Was it not Johnson's idea of

happiness to drive in a gig with a pretty woman? He wasn't much of a

muff! If anything could have kept him in good humor, this would have

done it. If he could have been on top of a coach with a bevy of them,

not even he could have said a rude thing.

[Sidenote: _Oxford._]

Oxford was reached before the sun went down. Its towers were seen for

miles--Magdalen, Baliol, Christ Church, and other familiar names. We

crossed the pretty little Isis, marvelling at every step, and drove up

the High Street to the Clarendon.

The next day was to be Commencement, and only a few rooms were to be had

in the hotel, but we were distributed very comfortably among houses in

the neighborhood. Several hours before dinner were delightfully spent in

a grand round of the colleges. We peeped into the great quads, walked

the cloisters, and got into all kinds of queer old-fashioned places. But

the stroll along the Isis, and past Magdalen Tower, and up the long

walk--that was the grand finish! We pardon Wolsey his greed of getting,

he was so princely in giving. To the man who did so much for Oxford much

may be forgiven.

* * * * *

OXFORD, June 21.

This morning was devoted to visiting the principal colleges more in

detail, and also to the ascent of the tower of the Sheldonian Theatre,

which no one should ever miss doing. Below us lay the city of palaces,

for such it seems, palaces of the right kind too--not for idle kings or

princes to riot in, and corrupt society by their bad example, but for

those who "scorn delights and live laborious days."

Our Cambridge member, Mr. B., tells us it does not cost more than L200

($1,000) per annum for a student here. This seems very cheap. The tariff

which we saw in one of the halls gave us a laugh:

"Commons.

Mutton, long, 11_d._

do. short, 9_d._

do. half, 7_d._"

The long and the half we could understand, but how could they manage the

short? This must be a kind of medium portion for fellows whose appetites

are only so-so. You see how fine things are cut even in Oxford. Our

party thought if the students were coaching there would be little

occasion for them to know anything of either short or half. At least we

were all in for long commons at eleven pence.

[Sidenote: _Martyrs._]

We drove past the martyrs' memorial, Latimer and Ridley's. Cranmer does

not deserve to be named with them. A visit to such a monument always

does me good, for it enables me to say to those who doubt the real

advancement of mankind: Now look at this, and think for what these grand

men were burnt! Is it conceivable that good, sterling men shall ever

again be called upon in England to die for opinion's sake! That Cranmer

wrote and advocated the right and necessity of putting to death those

who differed from him, and therefore that he met the fate he considered

it right to mete to others, shows what all parties held in those dark

days. I claim that the world has made a distinct and permanent advance

in this department which in no revolving circle of human affairs is ever

to be lost. The persecution of the Rev. Mr. Green, of Professor

Robertson Smith, and of Bishop Colenso in the present day proves, no

doubt, that there is much yet to be done ere we can be very proud of our

progress; but these are the worst of to-day's persecutions, and could

occur only in England and Scotland. There is a long gap between them and

burning at the stake! Grand old Latimer was prophetic when he called out

from amid the faggots to his colleague: "Be of good comfort and play the

man; we shall this day light such a candle by God's grace as I trust

shall never be put out!"

I think it certain that the candle will never again be put out. The

bigots of to-day can annoy only in Britain. In other English-speaking

communities even that power has passed away, and persecution for

opinion's sake is unknown. "A man may say the thing he will"--there is a

further and a higher stage yet to be reached when a man will consider it

a man's part to have an opinion upon all matters and say what he thinks

boldly, concealing nothing.

We left Oxford with just a sprinkle of rain falling, but we had scarcely

got fairly out of the city when it ceased and left the charming

landscape lovelier than ever. Banbury Cross was our destination, and on

our route lay magnificent Blenheim, the estate given by the nation to

the Duke of Marlborough. See what the nations do for the most successful

murderers of their fellows! and how insignificant have ever been the

rewards of those who preserve, improve, or discover--for a Marlborough

or a Wellington a fortune, for a Howard or a Wilberforce a pittance. It

is only in heathen China that the statesman, the man of letters, heads

the list. No military officer, however successful as a destroyer, can

ever reach the highest rank there, for with them the victories of peace

are more renowned than those of war; that is reserved for the men who

know--the Gladstones and the Disraelis, the Darwins and the Spencers,

the Arnolds and the Ruskins. It is only in civilized countries that the

first honors are given to butchers.

[Sidenote: _Blenheim._]

Blenheim is superb, grand, and broad enough to satisfy princely tastes.

And that noble library! As we walked through it we felt subdued, as if

in the presence of the gods of ages past, for a worthy collection of

great books ever breathes forth the influence of kings dead yet present,

of

"Those dead but sceptred sovereigns

Whose spirits still rule us from their urns."

And to think that this library, in whose treasures we revelled,

reverently taking one old tome after another in our hands, has since

then been sold by auction! Degenerate wretch! but one descended from

Marlborough can scarcely be called degenerate. You may not even be

responsible for what seems like family dishonor; some previous heir may

have rendered the sale necessary; but the dispersion of such treasures

as these must surely open the eyes of good men in England to the folly

of maintaining hereditary rank and privilege. Perhaps, however, the

noble owner had no more use for his books than the lord whose library

Burns was privileged to see, which showed no evidences of usage. The

bard wrote in a volume of Shakespeare he took up:

"Through and through the inspired leaves,

Ye maggots, make your windings;

But oh! respect his lordship's taste

And spare his golden bindings."

With many notable exceptions, the aristocracy of Britain took its rise

from bad men who did the dirty work of miserable kings, and from women

who were even worse than their lords. It seems hastening to an end in a

manner strictly in accordance with its birth. Even Englishmen will soon

become satisfied that no man should be born to honors, but that these

should be reserved for those who merit them. But what kind of fruit

could be expected from the tree of privilege? Its roots lie in

injustice, and not the least of its evils are those inflicted upon such

as are born under its shadow. The young peer who succeeds in making

somebody of himself does so in spite of a vicious system, and is

entitled to infinite praise; but though our race is slow to learn, the

people hear a wee bird singing these stirring days, and they begin to

like the song. The days of rank are numbered.

* * * * *

BANBURY, June 22.

[Sidenote: _Banbury Cross._]

Banbury Cross was reached about five o'clock, and few of us were so far

away in years or feeling from the days of childhood as not to remember

the nursery rhyme which was repeated as we came in sight of the famous

Cross. We expected to see a time-worn relic of days long past, and I

verily believe that some of us hoped for a glimpse of the old lady on

the white horse, with "rings on her fingers, and bells on her toes."

Imagine our disappointment, then, when we saw an elaborate Gothic

structure, looking as new and modern as if it had received its finishing

touches but yesterday. And so indeed it had, for it was recently

erected by public subscription. The charm was gone.

I like new political institutions for my native land, but prefer the old

historical structures; and as we drove past this spick-and-span

imitation of antiquity I felt like criticising the good people of

Banbury for the sacrilege I supposed they had committed in thus

supplanting the ancient landmark which had made their town known the

wide world over. I could not help entertaining a hope, too, that the

original "goodly Crosse with many degrees about it," had been put away

in some museum or other safe place where it could receive the homage of

all devoted lovers of Mother Goose. Alas! inquiry developed the fact

that the Puritanic besom of destruction, which demolished so many images

and other ornaments in the churches in good Queen Bess's time, swept

away Banbury Cross as early as 1602, and that not a piece of it remains

to tell of its ancient glory.

Banbury was early noted as a stronghold of Puritanism, and was famous,

as Fuller says, for "zeale, cheese and cakes." The zeal and the cheese

are not now as strong as they were, but Banbury cakes are still in as

high repute as ever, and are largely made and exported. They are

probably the same now as in the days of Ben Jonson, who tells of them in

"Bartholomew Fair,"--a kind of miniature mince pie, generally

lozenge-shaped, consisting of a rich paste with a filling of Zante

currants and other fruits.

Banbury has the celebrated works of my friend, Mr. Samuelson, M.P.; and

before dinner I walked out to see them, and if possible to learn

something of Mr. Samuelson's whereabouts. Upon returning to the hotel I

found that he was at that moment occupying the sitting-room adjoining

ours. We had an evening's talk and compared notes as brother

manufacturers. If England and America are drawing more closely together

politically, it is also true that the manufacturers of the two countries

have nearly the same problems to settle. Mr. Samuelson was deep in

railway discriminations and laboring with a parliamentary commission to

effect changes, or rather, as he would put it, to obtain justice.

I gave an account of our plans, our failures, and our successes, of

which he took note. This much I am bound to say for my former colleagues

upon this side (for before I reformed I was a railway manager), that the

manufacturers of Britain have wrongs of which we know nothing here,

though ours are bad enough. I add the last sentence lest Messrs.

Vanderbilt, Roberts, Cassatt, and the Garretts (father and son), might

receive a wrong impression from the previous admission; for these are

the gentlemen upon whom our fortunes hang.

[Sidenote: _Political Economy Club._]

The evidence given before the Parliament Commission in Britain, proves

that the people there are subjected to far worse treatment at the hands

of railway companies than we are here. American grain is transported

from Liverpool to London, for one-half the rate charged upon English

grain from points near Liverpool--I give this as one instance out of

hundreds. The defence of the railway company is that unless they carry

the foreign article at half rates the ships will carry it to London

direct, or that it will go by sea from Liverpool. I attended a meeting

of the Political Economy Club, in London, where the question of

legislative interference with railway charges was ably discussed. The

prevalent opinion seemed to be that it was doubtful whether the evils

could be cured by legislation. Being called upon to state our experience

here, I gave them an account of the unwise policy pursued by the

Pennsylvania Railroad Company (now happily reversed) at Pittsburgh and

its consequences; for the great riot in Pittsburgh had for its real

source the practice of the Railway Company of carrying the manufactures

of the East, from New York and Philadelphia, through the city of

Pittsburgh to the West for less than it would carry the same articles

for from Pittsburgh, although the distance was twice as great. Many such

anomalies as this still exist in England.

The members seemed interested in hearing that the result was that the

railway company finally agreed that in no case should the rates to and

from the shorter exceed those charged for the greater distance, and

Pittsburgh manufactures are now taken East and West at ten per cent.

less than the through rates between Chicago and the seaboard, no matter

how these may be forced by competition. While this rule does not ensure

exact justice nor cover all cases, it is nevertheless a great step in

advance and removes most of the more serious causes for just complaint.

The club spoken of is a notable one. It consists of twenty-five members,

only vacancies caused by death being filled by election. Admission is

considered a great honor. It is said that every question within the

range of practical politics upon which the club has declared its

opinion, has been legislated upon within a short time in accordance with

its decision. Every member is well known and must have a national

reputation. Among those present were Sir John Lubbock, who learnt early

in youth a rare secret, the way to learn--"_consider the ways of the

ant, and be wise_"--and Mr. Fawcett, the blind Postmaster-General, a man

whose career proves, as clearly perhaps as ever was proved, the truth

that there is no difficulty to him who wills.

Mr. Leonard Courtney, one of the coming men, took a leading part in the

discussion on railways; Mr. Giffen, however, read the paper of the

evening, which of course was able, although on the wrong side, as I

think. He is the noted man of figures, whose recent article, read before

the Statistical Society, showing the hundreds of millions America is

soon to contain, produced so startling an effect here, as well as in

Europe. Mr. Shaw Le Fevre, Lord Sherbrooke (Robert Lowe), and the

father of the Corn Law Repeal movement, Mr. Villiers, and several

others of note were present.

[Sidenote: _Satires and Epigrams._]

I was indebted to one of the members, my friend Prof. Thorold E. Rogers,

M.P., for the coveted opportunity to visit this club. By the way, I

wonder the Professor's book of Satires and Epigrams has not been

republished in America. It is wonderfully clever, and the Charioteers

have had many a laugh and many a pleasant half hour enjoying it.

Here is a specimen, which I may be pardoned quoting, as I found upon

inquiry that the hero Brown was no less than one of my own friends, a

Dunfermline man too, at that, Mr. Reid, M.P.:

"Sent to a distant land in early youth,

Brown made his way by honor, thrift, and truth;

Ten years he worked and saved, then, satisfied,

Back to his native land our merchant hied.

A man of worth as well as wealth, he sought

How he might wisely use the cash he'd brought:

He clearly saw his fortune could be graced

Only by prudence, candor, judgment, taste;

Assumed no airs, indulged in no pretence,

Guided his words, his acts, by common sense;

Maintained his self-respect, though glad to please,

Seemed not to aim, but won his aims with ease,

And proved that he had learnt the highest tact,

When no one feared and no one dared detract.

(I don't say hate, for some men are so nice

They cannot bear a man without a vice);

Well, such a hater, with a well-bred sneer,

(He took good care that all the room could hear):

Said, 'Dawdle asked me, Brown, if I could tell

What are your shield, your arms, your motto?' Well,

Brown winced, grew red, looked puzzled for a while,

Then answered gayly with a pleasant smile,

'My shield is _or_, sir, and the arms I bear,

Three mushrooms rampant.'--Motto, '_Here we are_.'"

There are many similar good things in the book, so I venture to point it

out to the enterprising publishers of America as something worthy

of--"conveying."

There is much discussion this morning as to the best route to take,

there is so much to tempt us on either of several ways. Shall we go by

Compton Verney (there is a pretty English name for you), Wellesbourn,

and Hastings? or shall we take our way through Broughton Castle,

Tadmarton, Scoalcliffe, Compton Wynyate, and Oxhill? In one way Wroxton

Abbey, one of the real genuine baronial abbeys, if one may say so, and

Edgehill. Surely no good Republican would miss that! But on the other

route we shall see the stronghold of Lord Saye and Sele, older yet than

Wroxton, and Compton Wynyate, older and finer than all--"a noble wreck

in ruinous perfection," and a third route still finer than either as far

as scenery is concerned. Such is this treasure house, this crowded grand

old England, whose every mile boasts such attractions to win our love.

"Look where we may, we cannot err

in this delicious region--change of place

Producing change of beauty--ever new."

Every day's journey only proves to us how little of all there is to see

we can see; how much we miss on the right and on the left. One might

coach upon this Island every summer during his whole life and yet die

leaving more of beauty and of interest to visit than all that he had

been able to see. When one does not know how to spend a summer's holiday

let him try this coaching life and thank heaven for a new world opened

to him.

[Sidenote: _Wroxton Abbey._]

We chose the first route, and whatever the others might have proved we

are satisfied, for it is unanimously decided that in Wroxton Abbey we

have seen our most interesting structure. Though it dates only from the

beginning of the seventeenth century, it is a grand building and a fine

example of the domestic architecture of the period. Its west front is a

hundred and eighteen feet long, and its porch is an elegant specimen of

the Italian decorated entrances of the time. Blenheim and Windsor are

larger, but had we our choice we would take Wroxton in preference to

either. With what interest did we wander through its quaint irregular

chambers and inspect its treasures! James I. slept in this bed, Charles

I. in that, and George IV. in another; this quilt is the work of Mary

Queen of Scots--there is her name; Queen Elizabeth occupied this chamber

during a visit, and King William this. Then the genuine old pictures,

although in this department Blenheim stands unrivalled. Marlborough knew

the adage that "to the victor belongs the spoils," and acted upon it

too, for he had rare opportunities abroad to gather treasures. But for a

realization of your most picturesque ideal of a great old English house,

betake yourselves to Wroxton Abbey. Its little chapel, rich in very old

oak carving, is in itself worth a journey to see.

A pretty story is told of the visit of James I. to the Abbey. The wife

of Sir William Pope, the owner, had lately presented him with a

daughter, and on the King's arrival the babe was brought to him bearing

in her little hand a scroll containing the following verses:

"See this little mistres here,

Did never sit in Peter's chaire,

Or a triple crowne did weare;

And yet she is a Pope.

"No benefice she ever sold,

Nor did dispence with sins for gold;

She hardly is a sev'nnight old,

And yet she is a Pope.

"No King her feet did ever kisse,

Or had from her worse look than this:

Nor did she ever hope

To saint one with a rope;

And yet she is a Pope.

A female Pope, you'll say, a second Joan;

No sure--she is Pope Innocent or none."

[Sidenote: _Edgehill._]

We lunched off deal tables and drank home-brewed ale in the tap-room of

the Holcroft Inn, a queer old place, but we had a jolly time amid every

kind of thing that carried us back to the England of past centuries.

Beyond Holcroft we came suddenly upon the grandest and most extensive

view by far that had yet rejoiced us. We were rolling along absorbed in

deep admiration of the fertile land that spread out before us on both

sides of the road, and extolling the never-ceasing peacefulness and

quiet charm of England, when, on passing through a cut, a wide and

varied panorama lay stretched at our feet. A dozen picturesque villages

and hamlets were in sight, and by the aid of our field-glass a dozen

more were brought within range. The spires of the churches, the poplars,

the hedgerows, the woods, the gently undulating land apparently giving

forth its luxuriant harvest with such ease and pleasure, all these made

up such a picture as we could not leave. We ordered the coach to go on

and wait at the foot of the hill until we had feasted ourselves with the

view. We lay upon the face of the hill and gazed on Arcadia smiling

below. Very soon some of the neighboring residents came, for one is

never long without human company in crowded England; and we found that

we were indeed upon sacred ground. This was Edgehill! As sturdy

republicans we lingered long upon the spot, gazing on the scene of that

bloody fight between king and people which, however, was almost without

immediate result--for it was a drawn battle--but which eventually led

to so much. Charles's army lay at Banbury, whence we had just come, that

of the Parliament at Kineton yonder, and spread out before us was the

plain where they met. The ground is now occupied by two farms called the

Battle Farms, distinguished as Battleton and Thistleton. Between the

farm-houses, on the latter place, are the places where the slain were

buried, appropriately called the Grave Fields. A copse of fir trees in

one place is said to mark the site of a pit into which five hundred were

thrown.

Some of the royalist writers have tried to prove that Cromwell was not

present at Edgehill, and one has even countenanced an idle tale that he

witnessed the battle from a steeple on one of the neighboring hills, and

that he incontinently took to his heels, or rather to his horses' legs,

when he thought the meeting had resulted disastrously to the forces of

the Parliament. But Carlyle characterizes this story as it deserves, for

Lord Nugent expressly mentions Cromwell's troop of dragoons as among

those that charged at the close of the battle. No, no, stern old Oliver

was not the man to stand aloof when he once had scent of a battle; and

we may be sure, although he was then but a captain of horse, that he did

good service at Edgehill.

There were good men on both sides that day, and not the least among them

was brave Sir Jacob Astley, who commanded Charles's foot. He was withal

a man of piety, for the Parliamentarians did not have a monopoly in

that line, however much their chroniclers may claim it; and I have

always regarded his prayer on that momentous Sunday morning as a model

which many clergymen might study with profit to themselves and to their

congregations. "O Lord!" said he, as he settled himself firmly in the

saddle, "Thou knowest how busy I must be this day. If I forget Thee, do

not Thou forget me. March on, boys!" Is not that to the purpose?

Let such as are at their appointed work have no fear that they will ever

be forgotten--the performance of a duty ranks before the offering of a

prayer, any day--nay, is of itself the best prayer. There's plenty of

time for lip service when we have served the Lord by hard work in a good

cause. When people have nothing better to do let them pray, but don't

let them be too greedy and ask much for themselves.

[Sidenote: _Warwick Castle._]

Our route lay through Warwick and Leamington. The view of the castle

from the bridge is, I believe, the best of its kind in England. "From

turret to foundation stone" it is all perfect. The very entrance tells

of the good old days. As we pass beneath the archway, over the

drawbridge, and under the portcullis, it all comes back to us.

"Up drawbridge, grooms. What, Warder, ho!

Let the portcullis fall!

To pass there was such scanty room

The bars descending razed his plume."

Warwick, the king-maker! This was his castle. His quarrel with the king

was one of our most taking recitations. The Scribe was considered heavy

in this:

"Know this, the man who injured Warwick

Never passed uninjured yet."

He found that out, did he not, my lord of the ragged staff!

The view from the great hall looking on the river below is fixed in my

mind. Don't miss it; and surely he who will climb to the top of Guy's

Tower will have cause for thankfulness for many a year thereafter. You

get a look at more of England there than is generally possible. I

sympathize with Ruskin in his rage at the attempt to raise funds by

subscription to mend the ravages of a recent fire in the castle. A

Warwick in the role of a Belisarius begging for an obolus! If the

king-maker could look upon this! But historical names are now often

trailed in the dust in England; and it must be some consolation to him,

wherever he may be, to know that the bearer of the title, if responsible

for this, is no scion of the old stock.

[Sidenote: _Guy of Warwick._]

The legend of Guy of Warwick, accepted as an historical fact by the

early writers, has been relegated to the garret of monkish superstition,

with the ribs of the dun cow and other once undoubted relics; but its

romance will always lend an interest to the old castle and attract the

traveller to the site of the hermitage on Guy's Cliff where the fabled

hero died and was buried. You must not suppose that Guy's Tower had any

connection with the original Guy, for the building dates only from the

close of the fourteenth century, while the latter boasts an antiquity of

nearly a thousand years. Indeed, we can place him to a dot, for the

antiquary Rous is very precise in his statement. He says: "On the

twelfth of June, 926, being the third year of the reign of Athelstan, a

most terrible single combat took place between the champions of the

kings of England and Denmark--Guy, Earl of Warwick, and Colebrand the

Pagan, an African giant; through the mercy of God the Christian

undertook the combat, being advised thereto by an angel; and the

faithful servant of God and the Church fortunately vanquished the enemy

of the whole realm of England."

Is it not dreadful to contemplate what might have been the consequences

if Colebrand the African had got the upper hand of that faithful servant

of God and the Church! But it was not to be. The Pagan had a lost fight

from the start, for, though the chronicle does not expressly say so, it

is very evident to the reflecting mind that Guy was backed throughout by

the angel--a mean advantage which, but for the immensity of the stake,

would have led any ordinary lover of fair play to side with the weaker

party. But not so with the wily monks of those days. In their easy

consciences the end justified the means, and so they glorified Guy as

the champion of all that was good, and so sedulously trumpeted his fame

that the Norman barons who succeeded to the ownership of the old Saxon

stronghold saw their interest in adopting the victor as an ancestor. In

time these Normans came to believe implicitly in the family tree with

Guy at the root, just as some silly people pin their faith to the

parchment evidences of the professional genealogists proving their

descent from some fabulous hero who followed William and his crew from

Normandy. They named their sons after Guy, called the tower his tower,

and hung up his arms and armor in the great hall, while their wives and

daughters worked his exploits in tapestry.

These proud descendants of a fabulous ancestor remind one of the general

in the "Pirates of Penzance" who is found weeping at the tomb in the

abbey belonging to the property he has purchased. When it is suggested

to him that his tears are misplaced, he replies: "Sir, when I bought

this property I bought this abbey and this tomb with its _contents_. I

do not know whose ancestors these _were_, but I do know whose ancestors

they _are_." And he falls to sobbing again, bound to have an ancestry of

some kind, the more important the more to belittle himself by

comparison. But the general is very English for all that. Tennyson's

lines,

"Trust me, Clara Vere de Vere,

From yon blue heavens above us bent

The grand old gardener and his wife

Smile at the claims of long descent,"

are well known and repeated by the school children all over the land,

but the grown men and women, entirely free from the weakness of trying

to figure out a family tree of respectable antiquity, will be found

unexpectedly small in this old land. Josh Billings settled the matter as

far as Americans are concerned, for the malady is even more ridiculous

in the New World. "We can't boast old family here," says he, "the

country ain't _long_ enough, unless a feller has Injun in him." That is

what the lawyers call an estoppel, I take it.

[Sidenote: _Kenilworth Castle._]

Driving through Leamington we reached Kenilworth Castle for luncheon, to

which we had looked forward for several days. Alas! the keeper informed

us that no picnic parties are admitted since the grounds have been put

into such excellent order by the kind Earl Clarendon (for which thanks,

good earl). But he was a man of some discrimination, this custodian of

the ruins, and when he saw our four-in-hand and learned who we

were--Americans! Brighton to Inverness!--he made us an exception to the

rule, of which I trust his lordship will approve, if he ever hears. We

had one of our happiest luncheons beneath the walls under a large

hawthorn tree, which we decided was the very place where the enraged

Queen Bess discovered dear Amy Robsart on that memorable night.

A thousand memories cluster round this ruin; but what should we have

known of it had not the great magician touched with his wand this dead

mass of stone and lime and conferred immortality upon the actors and

their revels? In his pages we live over again the days of old, and take

part with the Virgin Queen and her train of lords and ladies in the

grand reception so lavishly prepared for her amusement by the then

reigning favorite; ruined walls and towers and courts assume their

ancient proportions and resound with music and revelry, and the noble

park, now so quiet, is alive once more with huntsmen and gayly clad

courtiers. But vivid as is Scott's picture, it is exceeded in quaint

interest by the original account of the festivities from which the great

romancer drew his facts, but which is as little known to the ordinary

reader of "Kenilworth" as is the prototype of Hamlet to the common

play-goer. Master Robert Laneham, the writer, was a sort of hanger-on of

the court, and appears to have accompanied Leicester to Kenilworth. His

account is in the form of a letter addressed to "my good friend, Master

Humfrey Martin, Mercer," in London, and is written, says Scott, "in a

style of the most intolerable affectation, both in point of composition

and orthography."

After a brief account of the preliminary journey of the queen, this

veracious chronicler informs us that she was "met in the Park, about a

flight shoot from the Brayz and first gate of the castl" by a person

representing "one of the ten Sibills, comely clad in a Pall of white

Sylk, who pronounced a proper Poezi in English Rime and meeter."...

"This her majestie benignly accepting, passed foorth untoo the next gate

of the Brayz, which, for the length, largenes, and use they call now

the Tylt-yard; whear a Porter, tall of Person, big of lim and stearn of

countinance, wrapt also all in Sylke, with a club and keiz of quantitee

according, had a rough speech full of Passions, in meeter aptly made to

the purpose."

[Sidenote: _A Giant's Portrait._]

Be it here recorded that the Charioteers had the pleasure while in

London of looking upon the portrait of this giant porter, which hangs in

the King's Guard Chamber at Hampton Court Palace. It is supposed to have

been painted by the Italian artist Ferdinando Zucchero, who, it will be

remembered, visited England. The fellow is truly called "big of lim,"

for the canvas is more than nine feet high and the figure, which is said

to be of life size, measures eight and a half feet. His hand is

seventeen inches long. He stands with his left hand on his hip and his

right on a long rapier; is dressed in large balloon breeches, with black

stockings, and a white quilted vest with a black waistcoat over it; and

wears a cap with a feather in it and a small ruff. The picture was

painted after the queen's visit to Kenilworth, for the date 1580 is

plainly to be seen in one of the upper corners.

When the great porter had concluded, "six Trumpetoours, every one an

eight foot hye in due proportion of Parson beside, all in long garments

of Sylk suitabl," who stood upon the wall over the gate, sounded a "tune

of welcum." These "armonious blasterz mainteined their music very

delectably," while the queen rode into the inner gate, "where the Ladye

of the Lake (famous in King Arthurz Book) with two Nymphes waiting uppon

her, arrayed all in Sylks, attended her highness' coming. From the midst

of the Pool, whear uppon a moovable Iland bright blazing with Torches,

she floating to land, met her majestie with a well-penned meeter,"

expressive of the "Anncientie of the castl" and the hereditary dignity

of its owners.

"This Pageant was cloz'd up with a delectabl harmony of Hautboiz,

Shalmz, Cornets, and such oother loord Muzik," that held on while her

majesty crossed a bridge over a dry valley in front of the castle gate,

the different posts of which were decorated with fruits, flowers, birds,

and other decorations emblematic of the gifts of Sylvanus, Pomona,

Ceres, Neptune, and other divinities. Having passed this, the main gate

of the castle was reached. Over it, on a "Tabl beautifully garnisht

aboove with her Highness' Arms" was inscribed a Latin poem descriptive

of the various tributes paid to her arrival by the gods and goddesses.

The verses were read to her by a poet "in a long ceruleoous garment,

with a side and wide sleevz Venecian wize drawen up to his elboz, his

dooblet sleevz under that Crimson, nothing but Sylk: a Bay garland on

his head, and a skro in his hand."... "So passing into the inner Coourt,

her majesty (that never rides but alone), thear sat down from her

palfrey, was conveied up to Chamber: When after did follo so great peal

of gunz, and such lightning by fyrwork a long space toagither, as

Jupiter woold sheaw himself too be no furthur behind with his welcoom

than the rest of his gods."

The chronicler then gives an account of the festivities, which lasted

seventeen days and comprised nearly every amusement known to the period.

On Sunday, after "divine servis and preaching," the afternoon was spent

in "excellent muzik of sundry swet Instruments and in dauncing of Lordes

and Ladiez, and other woorshipfull degreez, uttered with such lively

agilitee and commendable grace az whither it moought be more straunge

too the eye, or pleazunt too the minde, for my part indeed I coold not

discern."

[Sidenote: _Bearbaiting._]

One morning was devoted to a bearbaiting, in which thirteen bears and

bandogs took part, "with such fending and prooving, with plucking and

tugging, skratting and byting, by plain tooth and nayll a to side and

toother, such expens of blood and leather waz thear between them, as a

moonths licking I ween will not recoover."

Refined amusement, you say, for the Queen of England and her court only

three hundred years ago. But not so fast, my dear lady; think what three

hundred years hence will say of you and your amusements. Did you not

give us a lively description the other evening of your riding after the

hounds? Lady Gay Spanker herself, I thought, could not have done it

better, and I am sure she was not more fascinating than you. But long

before one hundred years shall pass, my friend, ladies in your station

will be equally amazed that you could so torture a poor hare or fox and

feel it to be not only not _unworthy of a lady_ but a source of

enjoyment to you. I say your grandchild will blush for her grandma as

she shows to her children the picture of your lovely face. What Queen

Elizabeth is now in your eyes, what Roman emperors in the bloody

Coliseum were in hers, you will be in the eyes of the third generation

after you. Think of this. Remember what Cowper says:

"I would not rank among my list of friends,

Though graced with polished manners and fine sense,

That man who needlessly sets foot upon a worm."

Men will give up such sports after a time; but surely we may expect

women to find even in this day not only no pleasure but even positive

pain in such sports and leave them to coarser natures.

[Sidenote: _Sunday Amusements._]

Another day was marked by the exhibition of an Italian tumbler, who

displayed "such feats of agilitee, in goinges, turninges, tumblinges,

castings, hops, jumps, leaps, skips, springs, gambaud, soomersauts,

caprettiez, and flights; forward, backward, sydewize, a doownward,

upward, and with sundry windings, gyrings and circumflexions; allso

lightly and with such eaziness, as by me in feaw words it is not

expressibl by pen or speech I tell yoo plain." On the second Sunday,

after a "frutefull Sermon," a "solemn Brydeale of a proper Coopl was

appointed in the tylt-yard," attended by all the country folk in holiday

costume. This was followed by Morris dances, a Coventry play, and other

games. "By my troth, Master Martyn, 'twaz a lively pastime; I beleeve it

woold have mooved sum man to a right meerry mood, though had it be toold

him hiz wife lay a dying." And all this on the Holy Sawbath--for shame,

Queen Bess!

Nearly every hour had its appointed sport, one amusement following

another in endless variety, and the park was peopled with mimic gods and

goddesses who surprised the queen with complimentary dialogues and

addresses at every turn. Dancing and feasting were kept up all day long

and far into the night, for no note was taken of time. "The clok bell

sang not a note all the while her highness waz thear; the clok also

stood still withall; the handz of both the tablz stood firm and fast,

allwayz poynting at two a clok," the hour of banquet.

The day of our visit to Kenilworth was very warm, even for Americans,

and after luncheon we became a lazy, sleepy party. I have a distinct

recollection of an upward and then a downward movement which awoke me

suddenly. One after another of the party, caught asleep on a rug, was

treated to a tossing amid screams of laughter. We were all very drowsy,

but a fresh breeze arose as the sun declined, and remounting the coach

late in the afternoon we had a charming drive to Stratford-on-Avon.

* * * * *

STRATFORD-ON-AVON, June 23.

Our resting-place was the Red Horse Inn, of which Washington Irving has

written so delightfully. One can hardly say that he comes into

Shakespeare's country, for one is always there, so deeply and widely has

his influence reached. We live in his land always; but, as we approached

the quiet little village where he appeared on earth, we could not help

speculating upon the causes which produced the prodigy. One almost

expects nature herself to present a different aspect to enable us to

account in some measure for the apparition of a being so far beyond all

others; but it is not so--we see only the quiet beauty which

characterizes almost every part of England. His sweet sonnets seem the

natural outbirth of the land. Where met he the genius of tragedy, think

you? Surely not on the cultivated banks of the gentle Avon, where all is

so tame. But as Shakespeare resembled other burghers of Stratford so

much, not showing upon the surface that he was that

"largest son of time

Who wandering sang to a listening world,"

[Sidenote: _Shakespeare's Tomb._]

our search for external conditions as to his environment need not be

continued. Ordinary laws are inapplicable--he was a law unto himself.

How or why Shakespeare was Shakespeare will be settled when there shall

be few problems of the race left to settle. It is well that he lies on

the banks of the Avon, for that requires us to make a special visit to

his shrine to worship him. His mighty shade alone fills the mind. True

monotheists are we all who make the pilgrimage to Stratford. I have been

there often, but I am always awed into silence as I approach the church;

and when I stand beside the ashes of Shakespeare I cannot repress stern,

gloomy thoughts, and ask why so potent a force is now but a little dust.

The inexplicable waste of nature, a million born that one may live,

seems nothing compared to this--the brain of a god doing its work one

day and food for worms the next! No wonder, George Eliot, that this was

ever the weight that lay upon your heart and troubled you so!

A cheery voice behind me. "What is the matter? Are you ill? You look as

if you hadn't a friend in the world!" Thanks, gentle remembrancer. This

is no time for the Scribe to forget himself. We are not out for lessons

or for moralizing. Things are and shall be "altogether lovely." One must

often laugh if one would not cry.

Here is a funny conceit. A worthy draper in the town has recently put an

upright stone at the head of his wife's grave, with an inscription

setting forth the dates of her birth and death, and beneath it the

following verse:

"For the Lord has done great things for us, whereof we are

exceeding glad."

The wretch! One of the wives of our party declared that she could not

like a man who could think at such a crisis of such a verse, no matter

how he meant it. She was confident that he was one of those terribly

resigned kind of men who will find that the Lord has done great things

for him in the shape of a second helpmeet within two years.

This led to a search for other inscriptions. Here is one which struck

our fancy:

"Under these ashes lies one close confined,

Who was to all both affable and kind;

A neighbor good, extensive to ye poor,

Her soul we hope's at rest forevermore."

This was discussed and considered to go rather too far. Good

Swedenborgians still dispute about the body's rising again, and make a

great point of that, as showing their superior wisdom, as if it mattered

whether we rise with this body or another, any more than whether we wear

one suit of clothes or another; the great matter being that we rise at

all. But this good friend seems to bespeak rest forever for the soul.

One of us spoke of having lately seen a very remarkable collection of

passages from Scripture which seemed to permit the hope that all for

whom a kind father has nothing better in store than perpetual torture

will kindly be permitted to rest. One of the passages in question was:

"For the wicked shall _perish_ everlastingly." The question was remitted

to the theologians of our party, with instructions to give it prayerful

consideration and report.

[Sidenote: _Everlasting Punishment._]

If there be Scriptural warrant for the belief, I wish to embrace it at

once. Meanwhile I am not going to be sure that any poor miserable sinner

is to be disturbed when after "life's fitful fever he sleeps well" on

the tender, forgiving bosom of mother earth, unless he can be _finally_

fitted for as good or a better life than this. Therefore, good Emma and

Ella and the rest who are staunch dogmatists, be very careful how you

report, for it is a fearful thing to charge our Creator unjustly with

decreeing everlasting torture even to the worst offender into whom He

has breathed the breath of life. Refrain, if possible,

"Under this conjuration speak;

For we will hear, note, and believe in heart

That what you speak is in your conscience washed

As pure as sin with baptism."

I have not yet been favored with the report asked for, and therefore the

question rests.

The Charioteers got upon delicate ground occasionally, as was to be

expected, and although in all well regulated families two

subjects--politics and religion--are proscribed, we came near running

foul of the latter to-day. There were wide differences of opinion among

us, of course, from the true blue Presbyterian, strong for all the

tenets of Calvin, down to the milder Episcopalian who took more hopeful

views and asked:

"Shall there not be as good a 'Then' as 'Now'?

Haply much better! since one grain of rice

Shoots a green feather gemmed with fifty pearls,

And all the starry champak's white and gold

Lurks in those little, naked, gray spring-buds."

I related an incident which happened in Rome. As I entered the general

drawing room one evening, an exciting discussion was going forward on

the very subject which we were then considering. A lady of rank was

giving expression to very advanced ideas which others were combatting.

An old gentleman at last said: "Ladies and gentlemen, all this reminds

me of a discussion we young men were having once in my good old father's

hall, when my father happened to enter. After listening to us a few

minutes he said: 'Young men, you may as well cease your arguing. I'll

tell you all about it. In this life

"Our ingress is naked and bare,

Our progress is trouble and care,

Our egress is--no one knows where.

If you do well here, you'll do well there,--

I could tell you no more if I preached for a year."'"

The effect was instantaneous. Unanimous adhesion was given to the old

gentleman's conclusion, and the party bid each other a cordial good

night and went reconciled to bed. I am happy to record that such was

also the effect upon the Charioteers.

[Sidenote: _Shakespeare Stories._]

It will be taken for granted that while the Charioteers were in this

hallowed region many stories were told about Shakespeare. Two of the

gentlemen of our party, at least, dated our love of letters to the

circumstance that we were messenger boys in the Pittsburgh telegraph

office; and when we carried telegrams to the managers of the theatre,

good kind Mr. Porter (followed by one equally kind to us, Mr. Foster)

permitted us after delivering them to pass up to the gallery among the

gods, where we heard now and then one of the immortal plays. Having

heard the melodious flow of words, which of themselves seem to have some

spiritual meaning apart from the letter--differing in this from all

other combinations of words--how could we rest till we got the plays and

learnt most of the notable passages by heart, crooning over them till

they became parts of our intellectual being? One story, I remember,

shows how completely the master pervades literature. It is authentic,

too, for the teller was one of the actors in it.

Visiting friends in a country town, he went with the family to church

Sunday morning. The clergyman called in the evening and seeing upon the

parlor table an open copy of Shakespeare, perhaps suspecting (which was

true) that our friend had been entertaining the ladies with selections

from it, Sunday evening as it was, he felt moved to say that it was the

worldling's bible, which for himself he thought but little of and never

recommended for general reading. It was the mainstay of the theatre.

That is very strange, said our friend, for we have all been saying that

the finest part of your sermon was a short quotation from Shakespeare,

and I have been reading the whole passage to the ladies. Here it is:

"The quality of mercy is not strained;

It droppeth, as the gentle rain from heaven,

Upon the place beneath: it is twice blessed;

It blesses him that gives, and him that takes."

Imagine the feelings of the narrow, ignorant man, who really thought he

had a call from God to teach mankind. But he could not help it. A man

can no more escape the influence of Shakespeare than he can that of

surroundings. Shakespeare is the environment of all English-speaking

men.

Davie's Shakespearean story was of a fellow in Venango County who,

having just "struck ile," bought from a pedler a copy of "As You Like

It." He was so pleased with Touchstone that he wrote to the pedler: "If

that fellow Shakespeare ever writes anything more, be sure to get me one

of the first copies--and d-- the expense!"

[Sidenote: _Sir Thomas Lucy._]

We had one of the loveliest mornings imaginable for leaving Stratford.

Many had assembled to see the start, and our horn sounded several

parting blasts as we crossed the bridge and rode out of the town. Our

destination was Coventry, twenty-two miles away, and the route lay

through Charlecote Park and Hampton Lucy. This was one of the most

perfect of all our days. The deer in hundreds gazed on us as we passed.

There were some noble stags in the herd, the finest we had seen in

England, and Charlecote House was the best specimen of an Elizabethan

mansion. It was built about 1558 by the very Sir Thomas Lucy whom

Shakespeare satirized as Justice Shallow. The original family name was

Charlecote or Cherlcote, but about the end of the twelfth century

William, son of Walter de Cherlcote, assumed the name of Lucy and took

for his arms three luces (pike fish); so Justice Shallow was warranted

in affirming that his was an "old coat." The poet's verses will stick to

him as long as the world lasts; but judging from other circumstances,

Sir Thomas was a very good sort of a man and no doubt a fair specimen of

the English Squire of the time. His effigy may still be seen on his tomb

in Charlecote Church, beside that of his wife--a not unintelligent face,

with moustache and peaked beard cut square at the end, surrounded by the

ruff then in fashion. There is no epitaph of himself, but the marble

bears a warm memorial of his wife, who died five years before him,

concluding thus:

"Set down by him that best did know

What hath been written to be true."

An American Four-in-Hand in Britain · 第 3 / 20 题