PENN.

_Precedence._--Will any of your correspondents assign the order of

precedence of officers in army or navy (having no decoration, knighthood,

or companionship of any order of knighthood), not as respects each other,

but as respects civilians? I apprehend that every commission is addressed

to the bearer, embodying a civil title, as _e.g._, "John Smith, Esquire,"

or as we see ensigns gazetted, "A. B., Gent." My impression therefore is,

that in a mixed company of civilians, &c., no officer is entitled to take

rank higher than the _civil_ title incorporated in his commission would

imply, apart from his grade in the service to which he belongs. On this

point I should be obliged by any notices which your correspondents may

supply; as also by a classification in order of precedence of the ranks

which I here set down alphabetically: barristers, doctors (in divinity,

law, medicine), esquires, queen's counsel, serjeants-at-law.

It may be objected that esquire, ecuyer, armiger, is originally a military

title, but by usage it has been appropriated to civilians.

Notes and Queries, Number 241, June 10, 1854 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 61 / 141 题