Where were the hidings of this man's power? History tells of no leader

who was so idolized. For Garibaldi men braved martyrdom. For him,

women endured starvation. Priests risked the anathema of their

masters. Boys, wearing the red shirt, flung themselves upon the

bayonets of Austria and France. Captured, they were tortured by the

enemy, but died smiling rather than betray Garibaldi. There is a

tradition not mentioned by his best biographer, that many Italians

claim is absolutely true. Once when he was in hiding, he appeared at

midnight in the public square of Naples. The city was completely

controlled by the King, who had set a price upon Garibaldi's head. But

many of the people were secret followers of Garibaldi, who wished to

confer with one of his friends in the prison. Recognizing a policeman

who was his friend, Garibaldi put his fingers upon his lips and drew

his cloak the closer about his face. After a whispered word the

soldier led Garibaldi to the entrance of the prison. Another whispered

word and the great iron gate swung open. A second whispered

conversation and the inner gate opened. Within, another guard stooped

while Garibaldi whispered in his ear. A little later, out of a cell,

came that captured friend of Garibaldi. The hero asked and obtained

the information he desired. Putting his two fingers upon his lips,

Garibaldi saluted, and was led to the inner gate. Having passed

through he put those two fingers upon his lips, saluted, and was led

to the outer gate. Putting his fingers upon his lips he saluted again,

and with an officer who had become his guide, walked hurriedly to an

alley, where he stepped into his carriage, where he saluted and

disappeared in the darkness--whether cellar or attic no man knows

unto this day. The following morning Garibaldi led his troops into

battle. Now tell me, where is there in history of human heroism a

chapter more thrilling than this story of Garibaldi?

The truism that men without fault are generally men without force, is

well illustrated in the life of Garibaldi. It is the strongest, most

adventurous, romantic and troublous career in history. There are many

blots upon his scutcheon, just as there are many yellow spots upon the

front columns of the Parthenon, and nothing is gained by calling the

roll of faults rehearsed by his critics and enemies. "The evil that men

do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones."

Remember the story of the farmer in Sardinia who came home at night,

sick because he had lost a favourite lamb, and how the next morning

Garibaldi returned with the little dumb creature wrapped in his blanket

and lying upon his bosom. Remember, how at Palermo, Garibaldi came out

of the battlefield unshaken, but at sight of the little orphans in the

asylum crying for food the great soldier burst into tears. Even when

they led him to the palace and called him "Your Excellency," he frowned

and moved to the lighthouse, where, the idol of his people, he lived in

a tiny room with no furniture but a couch and a stool. Once he was

offered great riches if he would go out to China and lead a regiment and

ship slaves to South America, but he answered that "Not all the wealth

of the Indies could induce him to buy and sell human flesh." After his

long campaigns and victories for the people of Uruguay the new

government sent him a title deed to an enormous tract of land and

thousands of heads of cattle, but he tore up the deeds because he had

fought for liberty. In time of plague he became a nurse, in time of

shipwreck he risked his life to save his comrades.

It is true that for some years, under the influence of two friends who

were foreigners, he passed under the influence of their own materialism

and doubt, and he tells us that from that hour it seemed as if the

spirit of his mother and of Anita had both deserted him. During the last

years of his life he became almost a hermit and seemed to be confused by

the problems of the world in which he lived. But he had been starved,

imprisoned, tortured, betrayed and shot down. The real Garibaldi speaks

in this message that he addressed to the people of Italy:

"I am a Christian and I speak to Christians.

"I love and venerate the religion of Christ.

"Christ came into the world to deliver humanity from slavery.

"You who are here have the duty to educate the people.

"Educate them to be Christians.

"Education gives liberty.

"On a strong and wholesome education for the people depend the liberty

and greatness of Italy!

"Viva Victor Emmanuel!

"Viva Italia!

"Viva Christianity!"

VIII

JOHN RUSKIN

(1819-1900)

_And the Diffusion of the Beautiful_

The genius of John Ruskin's message is in a single sentence: "Life

without industry is guilt, and industry without art and education is

brutality." He held that all the doing that makes commerce is born of

the thinking that makes scholars, and that all the flying of looms and

the whirling of spindles begins with the quiet thought of some

scholar, hidden in a closet, or sequestered in a cloister. He never

made the mistake of supposing that education would change a ten-cent

boy into a thousand-dollar-a-year man, but he _did_ know that there is

some power in Nature that will transform a seed into a sheaf, an acorn

into an oak, and that the truth will change a child into a sage, a

statesman, a seer, a man with a message for his century.

Ruskin wrote many volumes to prove that wealth is not in raw

material;--not in iron, not in wood, not in stone, not in cotton, not

in wool. Wealth is largely in the intelligence put into the raw

material. Pig-iron is worth twenty dollars a ton, but intelligence

turns that ton of iron into a ton of tempered hair-springs, and it is

worth perhaps ten thousand dollars a ton. The clay in Rodin's

_Thinker_ represents a value of a few francs, but the idea in the

_Thinker_ brought 150,000 francs. On the sixtieth anniversary of the

coronation of Queen Victoria, an editor offered Rudyard Kipling $1,000

for a Commemoration poem. The paper, ink and the pen stand for a few

pennies; all the rest of the $1,000 was for a trained intellect. The

average income of a family in the United States to-day is not far from

$2,000. That income could be carried up to $4,000 if our workers would

only double the intelligence, efficiency and loyalty put into the raw

material they handle!

The career of Edison illustrates the industrial value of one informed

intellect to the nation. In 1910, business men in the United States

had invested in the expired patents of Thomas Edison six billion seven

hundred millions of dollars. These factories brought in an annual

income of a billion and seventy millions of dollars. To-day,

half-a-dozen Edisons, the one showing us how to burn the coal in the

ground, the other taking nitrogen out of the air, another showing us

how to transmute metals, another attacking the enemies of the cotton,

the fruits and the grains, with a teacher who would show the parents

of the country how successfully to assault intellectual and moral

illiteracy, would easily double our annual income. What our

country--what every country--needs is an invasion of knowledge and

sound sense. Therefore Ruskin's message, "the first business of the

nation is the manufacture of souls of a good quality."

During his lifetime John Ruskin wrote some forty volumes. Between the

ages of twenty and thirty he wrote _Modern Painters_, dealing with the

claims of cloud, sun, shower, wave, shrub and flower, land, sea, and

sky upon man's intellectual and moral life. He held that the open-air

world is man's best college and the forces of the winter and the

summer his best teachers. From thirty to forty he wrote the _Lectures

on Architecture_, and _Stones of Venice_, with many studies of the

galleries, towers, and cathedrals of Florence and Rome. In these books

his thought is that the soul of the people within determines the

painting, architecture and civilization of the state without. From

forty to fifty he wrote many books on the claim of the beautiful upon

man's spiritual life, and insisted that those claims were binding not

less upon the working people and the peasants in factory and field,

than upon the scholar in his library and the artist in his studio.

From fifty to sixty he wrote his _Fors Clavigera_, his _Time and

Tide_, _Munera Pulveris_, and _Unto This Last_, studies of the

problems of wealth and poverty, of labour and capital. He tells us

that men, to-day, are charmed with the glitter of gold and silver as

young birds are charmed with the glitter of snakes' eyes; that the

business man is divinely called to serve through property; that there

is, however, such a thing as a despotism of wealth; that the property

of some millionaires represents the breaking of the strength and the

will of competitors and the paralysis of the forces of the people, so

that what seems to be wealth, in verity is only "the gilded index of

far-reaching ruin, a wreckers' handful of coin, gleaned from the beach

to which he has beguiled an argosy; the camp follower's bundle of

rags, unwrapped from the breasts of goodly soldiers dead, the purchase

pieces of potter's fields, wherein shall be buried together the

citizen and the stranger."

And then Ruskin bent himself to what he believed to be the real task

of his life, the writing of a series of books on the problems of

labour and capital, in the hope that he might save the State from

trampled cornfields and from bloody streets. But just at the supreme

moment in his career his health gave way, and he never completed his

studies of the _Robber King_, the _Rust Kings_, the _Moth King_ and

the _Hero Kings_. John Ruskin died believing himself to be an

unfulfilled prophecy, in that he was unable to complete these books

for which he believed all his life had been one long preparation. But

in reality he was a prophet who gave forth a message that is slowly

transforming the institutions of mankind.

A full understanding of Ruskin's life-work begins with an outlook upon

his contribution to modern social reform. Biographers often identify a

great reform with one man's name, as if this man, single handed, had

wrought the social transformation. Thus they speak of Howard as the

reformer of prisons; of Shaftesbury as the author of the Poor Acts; of

Cobden as the author of the Corn Laws; of Lincoln, as the emancipator

of slaves; of Booth as the founder of the City Colony, the Home

Colony, the Farm Colony. But strictly speaking, thousands of leaders

of the movement for the abolition of slavery stood behind the forces

of Wilberforce in England, and Lincoln in the United States. Not

otherwise many biographers have claimed too much for the influence of

Ruskin, certainly more than the master would have claimed for himself.

At the beginning of his career Ruskin started a movement to diffuse

the beautiful in the life of the people. For centuries the beautiful

had been concentrated in the temples of Athens, the palaces and

galleries of Italy, the museums of Paris and London, in the manor

houses of the landed gentry. Meanwhile the poor people of Athens,

Venice and Florence lived in huts, wore leather garments, ate crusts,

dwelt amid ugliness, squalor and filth. Ruskin dreamed a dream of the

beautiful put into the life of the common people. He found that

Sheffield, with its smoking chimneys and grimy streets, had been

spoken of as the ugliest factory town in England. Therefore Ruskin

went to Sheffield, hired a building, installed therein his paintings,

etchings, and illuminated missals, and hired a few instructors to help

him diffuse the beautiful in the daily life of the people. He brought

in men who made the implements of the dining-room, and showed them how

to make the knife, the fork, the spoon, the table linen, minister to

the sentiment of taste and refinement. He brought in men who made

wall-papers for the poor man's house, and showed the craftsmen how to

make the colours soft and warm, delicate and beautiful. He interested

himself in beautiful furniture. He wrought with William Morris for a

more beautiful type of illustrations in books and magazines. He

denounced the ugliness of the houses and clothing and bridges and

railways. He insisted that women should have beautiful garments, the

youth read beautiful books, the men ride in beautiful cars, the

families live in beautiful little houses, the children play upon

beautiful carpets and look upon walls that had one or two beautiful

pictures. John Ruskin laboured, and others wrought with him, and now

at last we have entered into the fruit of their labours. To-day the

beautiful, once concentrated in temples, palaces, and cathedrals, is

diffused in the life of the common people.

In the same fashion Ruskin started a movement among the working men

for a diffusion of sound learning. The St. George Guild represents the

first University Extension Course and the first Chautauqua system our

world ever knew. More than fifty years ago he worked out his plan to

carry the knowledge given to rich men's sons in their lecture halls

and libraries to the working people, who were to carry on their

studies in the evening after the day's labour was over. He laid out a

course of studies for these working men, planned the organization of

lecture centers, gave us the outline of the University Extension

Course of lectures, induced many men in England to go from one working

man's guild and club to another, and after Ruskin's health broke down,

the men in the faculty of Oxford University took Ruskin's mother-idea,

and developed it into the University Extension Course of lectures.

Brought to our country that idea has spread through these lecture

courses carried on in great halls in the winter, in tents and open-air

assemblies in the summer.

We say much of our Social Settlement Work, and trace these thousands

of settlements in the tenement-house region of great cities back to

Arnold Toynbee's work, and that of Canon Barnett, in the East End of

London. But we must remember that when Ruskin was lecturing in Oxford

to some of the richest boys in Great Britain he told them that every

boy who consumed more than he produced was a pauper and that the more

the youth received from his ancestors and the State, the larger his

debt to those who were less fortunate. He believed that every gifted

boy should keep in touch, not only with his own class, but with all

classes, and that every youth would do well to do some physical work

every day. Ruskin and his students built a road outside of Oxford, and

the foreman of the gang of students was young Arnold Toynbee. Toynbee

admired and loved Ruskin, as a young pupil and disciple loves a noble

teacher and a great master.

After his health broke down, Ruskin gave up his work in Whitechapel Road

and urged Arnold Toynbee to give himself to the problems of the poor,

and when Ruskin's health gave way completely, it was Toynbee who rewrote

his lectures on labour and capital and gave them a new form in his

_Industrial Revolution in Great Britain_. The time came when Arnold

Toynbee broke down with overwork and brain fever, as his master had

broken before him, and his friend Canon Barnett raised the money to make

Toynbee Hall a permanent institution. But the seed of the Social

Settlement movement was John Ruskin's brief career in the tenement

region of the East End, and the first full fruit was in his disciple's

Toynbee Hall and in Canon Barnett's noble work at St. Jude's. Little by

little the Social Settlement Idea spread, until in the tenement regions

of Manchester, Birmingham, New York, Boston, Chicago and San Francisco,

gifted men and women of wealth, leisure and patrician position, began

to give their lives to the neglected poor.

Not less striking, the influence of Ruskin upon the plans of General

Booth. Long before the book called _In Darkest England and the Way

Out_ was published, Ruskin founded his coöperative printing press in a

little colony outside of London. One of his biographers has told the

story of Ruskin's plan to make the men and women in the poorhouses

self-supporting, happy and useful. This biographer has never fully

established the connection between that first coöperative colony of

Ruskin, and Booth's plans for the City Colony, the Farm Colony and the

Foreign Colony. But one thing is certain:--Ruskin had a pioneer mind.

Instead of his chief interest being in mountains and clouds, in wave

and flower, cathedrals, pictures, marbles, illuminated missals, the

overmastering enthusiasm of his life was people, and his real message

was a message of social reform. When long time has passed, Ruskin's

fame will rest upon his work as a social reformer, a man who loved the

poor and weak.

Not less significant, his views of education, that have leavened all

modern schools whatsoever. Matthew Arnold defined culture as "a

familiarity with the best that has ever been done in literature."

Ruskin insisted that there were thousands of scholars living in their

libraries, surrounded by books, who were perfectly familiar with the

best that has ever been thought or done, but whose knowledge was all

but worthless, because it was selfish. He looked upon the informed man

as a sower, going forth to sow the seed of truth over the wide land.

All selfish culture is like salt in a barrel; the salt has no power to

save unless it is scattered. Selfish culture is like seed corn in the

granary, important for a harvest. Under Ruskin's influence many of his

friends gave an evening or two a week to lectures before his working

men's clubs, his art groups, and his classes for the improvement of

the handicrafts.

No modern author has made so much of vision, or tried so hard to teach

people how to see. Many teachers think that education is stuffing the

pocket of memory with a mass of facts. When the mind is filled so that

it cannot hold another truth, the youth receives a diploma. Ruskin held

that education was teaching the child how to see everything true and

beautiful in land and sea and sky. "For a thousand great speakers, there

is only one great thinker; for a thousand great thinkers, there is only

one great see-er; we cut out one 'e' and leave it seer, but the true

poet and sage is simply the see-er." The millions are blind to the

signals hanged out from the battlements of cloud. Isaac Newton was a

see-er,--he saw an apple falling from the tree; saw a moon falling

through space, and gave us the law of gravity. Columbus was a see-er. In

a crevice in a bit of driftwood, tossed upon the shore of Spain, he saw

a strange pebble, and his imagination leaped from the driftwood to the

unknown forest from whence it came, from that bright piece of stone to

the mountain range of which it was a part. Columbus had the seeing eye,

and discovered the continent hidden behind the clouds.

Not otherwise the geologist sees the handwriting of God upon the

rock-pages; the astronomer sees His writing upon the pages of the sky;

the physiologist reads His writing on the pages of the human body; the

moralist deciphers the writing on the tablets of the mind and the

heart. The beginning of Wordsworth's fame was the hour when his eyes

were opened, and he saw man appearing upon the horizon, and like a

bright spirit trailing clouds of glory, coming from God who is man's

home. It was the inner sight of Wordsworth's soul that was "the bliss

of solitude." It was his power of vision that enabled him to look out

upon the field, yellow as gold, a vision that lingered long in his

memory when he said, "and then my heart with rapture thrills, and

dances with the daffodils."

It is useless for people who are colour-blind to look at Rembrandt's

portrait. It is folly for people who cannot follow a tune to buy a

ticket for a symphony concert. Men who by neglect atrophy the

spiritual faculty, or by sin cut gashes in the nerve of conscience,

will soon exclaim, in the spirit of the fool, "There is no God," just

as the blind man is certain that there is no sun. The old black

ex-slave, Sojourner Truth, once illustrated this principle. In those

days excitement ran high. Northern merchants, fearful of losing their

trade with Southern cities, frowned upon any one who dared criticize

"the peculiar institution" of the South. One day, in New York,

Sojourner Truth, just escaped from slavery, went to an Abolition

Meeting, hoping for an opportunity of making a plea for the

emancipation of her race. When the black woman, with her gnarled

hands, and face seamed with pain and sorrow, arose to speak, a young

newspaper reporter slammed his book upon the table, and stamped his

way down the aisle toward the door. Just before he reached the door,

Sojourner Truth stretched out her long black finger and said, "Wait a

minute, honey! You goin' 'way 'cause of me? Listen, honey--I would

give you some ideas to take home with you to your newspaper, but I see

you ain't got nothing to carry 'em in!" . . . Homely but forceful

illustration of an old truth. The angel of truth and the angel of

beauty, leaning from the battlements of heaven, oft whispers, "Oh, my

children! I would fain give you a new tool, a new painting, a new

science, but you have no eyes to see the vision, and no ears to hear

the sweetest music that ever fell from heaven's battlements." It is

the man of vision who founds the new school of painting, or the new

reform or the new liberty. The visions of the idealist to-day become

the laws and institutions of to-morrow.

In this power of the open eye, Ruskin found the secret of daily

happiness, and mental growth. No one knew better than John Ruskin that

the millions of working men and women would never be able to make

their way to the galleries of Paris and Madrid, of Florence and

Venice, to St. Peter's or the Parthenon, much less have time, leisure

and money for travel unto the far-off ends of the earth. Therefore he

taught the people how to see the wonders of God, in every fluted blade

of grass, in every bush that blazed with beauty, and blazing, was not

consumed. He proved that he who knows how to see will find the common

clod to be a casket filled with gems, and that the sky that looks down

upon all workers, spreads out scenes of such loveliness and beauty as

to make travel to distant lands unnecessary!

And yet, for the most part, men turn their eyes toward the sky only in

moments of utter idleness and insipidity. "One says it has been wet,

and another, it has been windy, and another, it has been warm. But

who, among the whole chattering crowd, can tell me of the forms and

precipices of the chain of tall white mountains that girded the

horizon at noon yesterday? Who saw the narrow sunbeam that came out of

the south, and smote upon their summits, until they melted and

mouldered away in a dust of blue rain? Who saw the dance of the dead

clouds, when the sunlight left them last night, and the west wind blew

them before it like withered leaves? All has passed, unregretted, and

unseen. Not in the clash of the hail nor the drift of the whirlwind,

are the highest characters developed. God is not in the earthquake,

nor in the fire, but in the still small voice. Blunt and low those

faculties of our nature, which can only be addressed through

lamp-black and lightning."

The whole world owes Ruskin an immeasurable debt for this: that he

taught us how to see the beauty in the great imperial palace in which

man hath his home.

Great Men as Prophets of a New Era · 第 9 / 10 段