LETTER XIII.

Venice.

The history of no nation presents a greater variety of singular events

than that of Venice. We have seen a conspiracy against this State,

originating among the citizens, and carried on by people of that rank

only. We saw another, soon after, which took its origin among the body

of the nobles; but the year 1355 presents us with one of a still more

extraordinary nature, begun, and carried on, by the Doge himself. If

ambition, or the augmentation of his own power, had been the object, it

would not have been so surprising; but his motive to the conspiracy was

as small as the intention was dreadful.

Marino Falliero, Doge of Venice, was, at this time, eighty years of age;

a time of life when the violence of the passions is generally pretty

much abated. He had, even then, however, given a strong instance of the

rashness of his disposition, by marrying a very young woman. This lady

imagined she had been affronted by a young Venetian nobleman at a public

ball, and she complained bitterly of the insult to her husband. The old

Doge, who had all the desire imaginable to please his wife, determined,

in this matter at least, to give her ample satisfaction.

The delinquent was brought before the Judges, and the crime was

exaggerated with all the eloquence that money could purchase; but they

viewed the affair with unprejudiced eyes, and pronounced a sentence

no more than adequate to the crime. The Doge was filled with the most

extravagant rage, and, finding that the body of the nobles took no

share in his wrath, he entered into a conspiracy with the Admiral of

the Arsenal, and some others, who were discontented with the government

on other accounts, and projected a method of vindicating his wife’s

honour, which seems rather violent for the occasion. It was resolved by

those desperadoes, to massacre the whole Grand Council. Such a scene

of bloodshed, on account of one woman, has not been imagined since the

Trojan war.

This plot was conducted with more secrecy than could have been expected,

from a man who seems to have been deprived of reason, as well as

humanity. Every thing was prepared; and the day, previous to that which

was fixed for the execution, had arrived, without any person, but those

concerned in the conspiracy, having the least knowledge of the horrid

design.

It was discovered in the same manner in which that against the King and

Parliament of England, was brought to light in the time of James the

First.

Bertrand Bergamese, one of the conspirators, being desirous to save

Nicolas Lioni, a noble Venetian, from the general massacre, called on

him, and earnestly admonished him, on no account, to go out of his house

the following day; for, if he did, he would certainly lose his life.

Lioni pressed him to give some reason for this extraordinary advice;

which the other obstinately refusing, Lioni ordered him to be seized, and

confined, and, sending for some of his friends of the Senate, by means

of promises and threats, they at length prevailed on the prisoner to

discover the whole of this horrid mystery.

They send for the Avogadors, the Council of Ten, and other high officers,

by whom the prisoner was examined; after which, orders were given for

seizing the principal conspirators in their houses, and for summoning

those of the nobility and citizens, on whose fidelity the Council could

rely. These measures could not be taken so secretly as not to alarm

many, who found means to make their escape. A considerable number were

arrested, among whom were two chiefs of the conspiracy under the Doge.

They being put to the question, confessed the whole. It appeared, that

only a select body of the principal men had been privy to the real

design; great numbers had been desired to be prepared with arms, at a

particular hour, when they would be employed in attacking certain enemies

of the State, which were not named; they were desired to keep those

orders a perfect secret, and were told, that upon their fidelity and

secrecy their future fortunes depended. Those men did not know of each

other, and had no suspicion that it was not a lawful enterprise for

which they were thus engaged; they were therefore set at liberty; but all

the chiefs of the plot gave the fullest evidence against the Doge. It

was proved, that the whole scheme had been formed by his direction, and

supported by his influence. After the principal conspirators were tried,

and executed, the Council of Ten next proceeded to the trial of the Doge

himself. They desired that twenty senators, of the highest reputation,

might assist upon this solemn occasion; and that two relations of the

Fallier family, one of whom was a member of the Council of Ten, and the

other an Avogador, might withdraw from the court.

The Doge, who hitherto had remained under a guard in his own apartments

in the palace, was now brought before this Tribunal of his own subjects.

He was dressed in the robes of his office.

It is thought he intended to have denied the charge, and attempted a

defence; but when he perceived the number and nature of the proofs

against him, overwhelmed by their force, he acknowledged his guilt, with

many fruitless and abject intreaties for mercy.

That a man, of eighty years of age, should lose all firmness on such

an occasion, is not marvellous; that he should have been incited, by

a trifling offence, to such an inhuman, and such a deliberate plan of

wickedness, is without example.

He was sentenced to lose his head. The sentence was executed in the place

where the Doges are usually crowned.

In the Great Chamber of the palace, where the portraits of the Doges

are placed, there is a vacant space between the portraits of Fallier’s

immediate predecessor and successor, with this inscription:

Locus Marini Fallieri decapitati.

The only other instance which history presents to our contemplation, of

a sovereign tried according to the forms of law, and condemned to death

by a Tribunal of his own subjects, is that of Charles the First, of Great

Britain. But how differently are we affected by a review of the two cases!

In the one, the original errors of the misguided Prince are forgotten in

the severity of his fate, and in the calm majestic firmness with which he

bore it. Those who, from public spirit, had opposed the unconstitutional

measures of his government, were no more; and the men now in power were

actuated by far different principles. All the passions of humanity,

therefore, take part with the royal sufferer; nothing but the ungenerous

spirit of party can seduce them to the side of his enemies. In his trial

we behold, with a mixture of pity and indignation, the unhappy monarch

delivered up to the malice of hypocrites, the rage of fanatics, and the

insolence of a low-born law ruffian.

In the other, every sentiment of compassion is effaced by horror, at the

enormity of the crime.

In the year 1361, after the death of the Doge John Delfino, when the last

electors were confined in the Ducal Chamber to choose his successor, and

while the election vibrated between three candidates, a report arrived

at Venice, that Laurentius Celsus, who commanded the fleet, had obtained

a complete victory over the Genoese, who were at that time at war with

the Venetians. This intelligence was communicated to the electors, who

immediately dropped all the three candidates, and unanimously chose this

commander. Soon after, it was found, that the rumour of the victory was

entirely groundless. This could not affect the validity of the election;

but it produced a decree to prevent, on future occasions of the same

kind, all communication between the people without, and the conclave of

electors.

This Doge’s father displayed a singular instance of weakness and vanity,

which some of the historians have thought worth transmitting to us. I

do not know for what reason, unless it be to comfort posterity with the

reflection, that human folly is much the same in all ages, and that

their ancestors have not been a great deal wiser than themselves. This

old gentleman thought it beneath the dignity of a father to pull off his

cap to his own son; and that he might not seem to condescend so far,

even when all the other nobles shewed this mark of respect to their

sovereign, he went, from the moment of his son’s election, upon all

occasions, and in all weathers, with his head uncovered. The Doge being

solicitous for his father’s health, and finding that no persuasion,

nor explanation of the matter, that could be given, were sufficient to

overcome this obstinacy, recollected that he was as devout as he was

vain, which suggested an expedient that had the desired effect. He placed

a cross on the front of his ducal coronet. The old man was as desirous to

testify his respect to the cross, as he was averse to pay obeisance to

his son; and unable to devise any way of pulling off a cap which he never

wore, his piety, at length, got the better of his pride; he resumed his

cap, as formerly, that, as often as his son appeared, he might pull it

off in honour of the cross.

During the reign of Laurentius Celsus, the celebrated poet Petrarch, who

resided for some time at Venice, and was pleased with the manners of

the people, and the wisdom of their government, made a present to the

republic, of his collection of books; which, at that time, was reckoned

very valuable. This was the foundation of the great library of St. Mark.

In perusing the annals of Venice, we continually meet with new

institutions. No sooner is any inconveniency perceived, than measures are

taken to remove it, or guard against its effects. About this time, three

new magistrates were appointed, whose duty is to prevent all ostentatious

luxuries in dress, equipage, and other expensive superfluities, and to

prosecute those who transgress the sumptuary laws, which comprehend such

objects. Those magistrates are called Sopra Proveditori alle Pompé;

they were allowed a discretionary power of levying fines, from people

of certain professions; who deal entirely in articles of luxury. Of

this number, that of public courtesans was reckoned. This profession,

according to all accounts, formerly flourished at Venice, with a

degree of splendour unknown in any other capital of Europe; and very

considerable exactions were raised to the use of the State, at particular

times, from the wealthiest of those dealers. This excise, it would

appear, has been pushed beyond what the trade could bear; for it is at

present in a state of wretchedness and decay; the best of the business,

as is said, being now carried on, for mere pleasure, by people who do not

avow themselves of the profession.

A View of Society and Manners in Italy, Volume 1 (of 2) With Anecdotes Relating to some Eminent Characters · 第 25 / 88 题