INTRODUCTION

Pío Baroja is a product of the intellectual reign of terror that went on

in Spain after the catastrophe of 1898. That catastrophe, of course, was

anything but unforeseen. The national literature, for a good many years

before the event, had been made dismal by the croaking of Iokanaans, and

there was a definite _défaitiste_ party among the _intelligentsia_.

But among the people in general, if there was not optimism, there was at

least a sort of resigned indifference, and so things went ahead in the

old stupid Spanish way and the structure of society, despite a few

gestures of liberalism, remained as it had been for generations. In Spain,

of course, there is always a _Kulturkampf_, as there is in Italy,

but during these years it was quiescent. The Church, in the shadow of

the restored monarchy, gradually resumed its old privileges and its old

pretensions. So on the political side. In Catalonia, where Spain keeps the

strangest melting-pot in Europe and the old Iberian stock is almost

extinct, there was a menacing seething, but elsewhere there was not much

to chill the conservative spine. In the middle nineties, when the

Socialist vote in Germany was already approaching the two million mark,

and Belgium was rocked by great Socialist demonstrations, and the

Socialist deputies in the French Chamber numbered fifty, and even England

was beginning to toy gingerly with new schemes of social reform, by

Bismarck out of Lassalle, the total strength of the Socialists of Spain

was still not much above five thousand votes. In brief, the country seemed

to be removed from the main currents of European thought. There was

unrest, to be sure, but it was unrest that was largely inarticulate and

that needed a new race of leaders to give it form and direction.

Then came the colossal shock of the American war and a sudden

transvaluation of all the old values. Anti-clericalism got on its legs

and Socialism got on its legs, and out of the two grew that great

movement for the liberation of the common people, that determined and

bitter struggle for a fair share in the fruits of human progress, which

came to its melodramatic climax in the execution of Francisco Ferrer.

Spain now began to go ahead very rapidly, if not in actual achievement,

then at least in the examination and exchange of ideas, good and bad.

Parties formed, split, blew up, revived and combined, each with its sure

cure for all the sorrows of the land. Resignationism gave way to a harsh

and searching questioning, and questioning to denunciation and demand

for reform. The monarchy swayed this way and that, seeking to avoid both

the peril of too much yielding and the worse peril of not yielding

enough. The Church, on the defensive once more, prepared quickly for

stormy weather and sent hurried calls to Rome for help. Nor was all this

uproar on the political and practical side. Spanish letters, for years

sunk into formalism, revived with the national spirit, and the new books

in prose and verse began to deal vigorously with the here and now.

Novelists, poets and essayists appeared who had never been heard of

before--young men full of exciting ideas borrowed from foreign lands and

even more exciting ideas of their own fashioning. The national

literature, but lately so academic and remote from existence, was now

furiously lively, challenging and provocative. The people found in it,

not the old placid escape from life, but a new stimulation to arduous

and ardent living. And out of the ruck of authors, eager, exigent, and

the tremendous clash of nations, new and old, there finally emerged a

prose based not upon rhetorical reminiscences, but responsive minutely

to the necessities of the national life. The oratorical platitudes of

Castelar and Cánovas del Castillo gave way to the discreet analyses of

Azorín (José Martínez Ruiz) and José Ortega y Gasset, to the sober

sentences of the Rector of the University of Salamanca, Miguel de

Unamuno, writing with a restraint which is anything but traditionally

Castilian, and to the journalistic impressionism of Ramiro de Maeztu,

supple and cosmopolitan from long residence abroad. The poets now

jettisoned the rotundities of the romantic and emotional schools of

Zorrilla and Salvador Rueda, and substituted instead the precise,

pictorial line of Rubén Darío, Juan Ramón Jiménez, and the brothers

Machado, while the socialistic and republican propaganda which had

invaded the theatre with Pérez Galdós, Joaquín Dicenta, and Angel

Guimerá, bore fruit in the psychological drama of Benavente, the social

comedies of Linares Rivas, and the atmospheric canvases which the

Quinteros have painted of Andalusia.

In the novel, the transformation is noticeable at once in the rapid

development of the pornographic tale, whose riches might bring a blush

to the cheek of Boccaccio, and provide Poggio and Aretino with a

complete review; but these are stories for the barrack, venturing only

now and then upon the confines of respectability in the erotic romances

of Zamacois and the late enormously popular Felipe Trigo. Few Spaniards

who write today but have written novels. Yet the gesture of the grand

style of Valera is palsied, except, perhaps, for the conservative

Quixote, Ricardo León, a functionary in the Bank of Spain, while the

idyllic method lingers fitfully in such gentle writers as José María

Salaverría, after surviving the attacks of the northern realists under

the lead of Pereda, in his novels of country life, and of the less

vigorous Antonio de Trueba, and of Madrid vulgarians, headed by Mesonero

Romanos and Coloma. The decadent novel, foreshadowed a few years since

by Alejandro Sawa, has attained full maturity in Hoyos y Vinent, while

the distinctive growth of the century is the novel of ideas, exact,

penetrating, persistently suggestive in the larger sense, which does not

hesitate to make demands upon the reader, and this is exemplified most

distinctively, both temperamentally and intellectually, by Pío Baroja.

It would be difficult to find two men who, dealing with the same ideas,

bring to them more antagonistic attitudes of mind than Baroja and Blasco

Ibáñez. For all his appearance of modernism, Blasco really belongs to

the generation before 1898. He is of the stock of Victor Hugo--a

popular rhapsodist and intellectual swashbuckler, half artist and half

mob orator--a man of florid and shallow certainties, violent

enthusiasms, quack remedies, vast magnetism and address, and even vaster

impudence--a fellow with plain touches of the charlatan. His first solid

success at home was made with _La Barraca_ in 1899--and it was a

success a good deal more political than artistic; he was hailed for his

frenzy far more than for his craft. Even outside of Spain his subsequent

celebrity has tended to ground itself upon agreement with his politics,

and not upon anything properly describable as a critical appreciation of

his talents. Had _The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse_ been

directed against France instead of in favour of France, it goes without

saying that it would have come to the United States without the

_imprimatur_ of the American Embassy at Madrid, and that there

would have appeared no sudden rage for the author among the generality

of novel-readers. His intrinsic merits, in sober retrospect, seem very

feeble. For all his concern with current questions, his accurate news

instinct, he is fundamentally a romantic of the last century, with more

than one plain touch of the downright operatic.

Baroja is a man of a very different sort. A novelist undoubtedly as

skilful as Blasco and a good deal more profound, he lacks the quality of

enthusiasm and thus makes a more restricted appeal. In place of gaudy

certainties he offers disconcerting questionings; in place of a neat and

well-rounded body of doctrine he puts forward a sort of generalized

contra-doctrine. Blasco is almost the typical Socialist--iconoclastic,

oratorical, sentimental, theatrical--a fervent advocate of all sorts of

lofty causes, eagerly responsive to the shibboleths of the hour. Baroja

is the analyst, the critic, almost the cynic. If he leans toward any

definite doctrine at all, it is toward the doctrine that the essential

ills of man are incurable, that all the remedies proposed are as bad as

the disease, that it is almost a waste of time to bother about humanity

in general. This agnostic attitude, of course, is very far from merely

academic, monastic. Baroja, though his career has not been as dramatic

as Blasco's, has at all events taken a hand in the life of his time and

country and served his day in the trenches of the new enlightenment. He

is anything but a theorist. But there is surely no little significance

in his final retreat to his Basque hillside, there to seek peace above

the turmoil. He is, one fancies, a bit disgusted and a bit despairing.

But if it is despair, it is surely not the despair of one who has

shirked the trial.

The present book, _Juventud, Egolatría_, was written at the height

of the late war, and there is a preface to the original edition, omitted

here, in which Baroja defends his concern with aesthetic and

philosophical matters at such a time. The apologia was quite gratuitous.

A book on the war, though by the first novelist of present-day Spain,

would probably have been as useless as all the other books on the war.

That stupendous event will be far more soundly discussed by men who have

not felt its harsh appeal to the emotions. Baroja, evading this grand

enemy of all ideas, sat himself down to inspect and co-ordinate the

ideas that had gradually come to growth in his mind before the bands

began to bray. The result is a book that is interesting, not only as the

frank talking aloud of one very unusual man, but also as a

representation of what is going on in the heads of a great many other

Spaniards. Blasco, it seems to me, is often less Spanish than French;

Valencia, after all, is next door to Catalonia, and Catalonia is

anything but Castilian. But Baroja, though he is also un-Castilian and

even a bit anti-Castilian, is still a thorough Spaniard. He is more

interested in a literary feud in Madrid than in a holocaust beyond the

Pyrenees. He gets into his discussion of every problem a definitely

Spanish flavour. He is unmistakably a Spaniard even when he is trying

most rigorously to be unbiased and international. He thinks out

everything in Spanish terms. In him, from first to last, one observes

all the peculiar qualities of the Iberian mind--its disillusion, its

patient weariness, its pervasive melancholy. Spain, I take it, is the

most misunderstood of countries. The world cannot get over seeing it

through the pink mist of _Carmen_, an astounding Gallic caricature,

half flattery and half libel. The actual Spaniard is surely no such

grand-opera Frenchman as the immortal toreador. I prescribe the

treatment that cured me, for one, of mistaking him for an Iberian. That

is, I prescribe a visit to Spain in carnival time.

Baroja, then, stands for the modern Spanish mind at its most

enlightened. He is the Spaniard of education and worldly wisdom,

detached from the mediaeval imbecilities of the old régime and yet aloof

from the worse follies of the demagogues who now rage in the country.

Vastly less picturesque than Blasco Ibáñez, he is nearer the normal

Spaniard--the Spaniard who, in the long run, must erect a new structure

of society upon the half archaic and half Utopian chaos now reigning in

the peninsula. Thus his book, though it is addressed to Spaniards,

should have a certain value for English-speaking readers. And so it is

presented.

Youth and Egolatry · 第 24 / 190 题