XXIII. The Toy Theatre

There is only one reason why all grown-up people do not play with toys;

and it is a fair reason. The reason is that playing with toys takes so

very much more time and trouble than anything else. Playing as children

mean playing is the most serious thing in the world; and as soon as we

have small duties or small sorrows we have to abandon to some extent

so enormous and ambitious a plan of life. We have enough strength

for politics and commerce and art and philosophy; we have not enough

strength for play. This is a truth which every one will recognize who,

as a child, has ever played with anything at all; any one who has played

with bricks, any one who has played with dolls, any one who has played

with tin soldiers. My journalistic work, which earns money, is not

pursued with such awful persistency as that work which earned nothing.

.....

Take the case of bricks. If you publish a book to-morrow in twelve

volumes (it would be just like you) on “The Theory and Practice

of European Architecture,” your work may be laborious, but it is

fundamentally frivolous. It is not serious as the work of a child piling

one brick on the other is serious; for the simple reason that if your

book is a bad book no one will ever be able ultimately and entirely to

prove to you that it is a bad book. Whereas if his balance of bricks

is a bad balance of bricks, it will simply tumble down. And if I know

anything of children, he will set to work solemnly and sadly to build it

up again. Whereas, if I know anything of authors, nothing would induce

you to write your book again, or even to think of it again if you could

help it.

Take the case of dolls. It is much easier to care for an educational

cause than to care for a doll. It is as easy to write an article on

education as to write an article on toffee or tramcars or anything else.

But it is almost as difficult to look after a doll as to look after a

child. The little girls that I meet in the little streets of Battersea

worship their dolls in a way that reminds one not so much of play as

idolatry. In some cases the love and care of the artistic symbol has

actually become more important than the human reality which it was, I

suppose, originally meant to symbolize.

I remember a Battersea little girl who wheeled her large baby sister

stuffed into a doll’s perambulator. When questioned on this course of

conduct, she replied: “I haven’t got a dolly, and Baby is pretending to

be my dolly.” Nature was indeed imitating art. First a doll had been a

substitute for a child; afterwards a child was a mere substitute for a

doll. But that opens other matters; the point is here that such devotion

takes up most of the brain and most of the life; much as if it were

really the thing which it is supposed to symbolize. The point is that

the man writing on motherhood is merely an educationalist; the child

playing with a doll is a mother.

Take the case of soldiers. A man writing an article on military strategy

is simply a man writing an article; a horrid sight. But a boy making a

campaign with tin soldiers is like a General making a campaign with live

soldiers. He must to the limit of his juvenile powers think about the

thing; whereas the war correspondent need not think at all. I remember

a war correspondent who remarked after the capture of Methuen: “This

renewed activity on the part of Delarey is probably due to his

being short of stores.” The same military critic had mentioned a few

paragraphs before that Delarey was being hard pressed by a column which

was pursuing him under the command of Methuen. Methuen chased Delarey;

and Delarey’s activity was due to his being short of stores. Otherwise

he would have stood quite still while he was chased. I run after Jones

with a hatchet, and if he turns round and tries to get rid of me the

only possible explanation is that he has a very small balance at his

bankers. I cannot believe that any boy playing at soldiers would be as

idiotic as this. But then any one playing at anything has to be serious.

Whereas, as I have only too good reason to know, if you are writing an

article you can say anything that comes into your head.

.....

Broadly, then, what keeps adults from joining in children’s games is,

generally speaking, not that they have no pleasure in them; it is simply

that they have no leisure for them. It is that they cannot afford the

expenditure of toil and time and consideration for so grand and grave a

scheme. I have been myself attempting for some time past to complete

a play in a small toy theatre, the sort of toy theatre that used to be

called Penny Plain and Twopence Coloured; only that I drew and coloured

the figures and scenes myself. Hence I was free from the degrading

obligation of having to pay either a penny or twopence; I only had to

pay a shilling a sheet for good cardboard and a shilling a box for bad

water colours. The kind of miniature stage I mean is probably familiar

to every one; it is never more than a development of the stage which

Skelt made and Stevenson celebrated.

But though I have worked much harder at the toy theatre than I ever

worked at any tale or article, I cannot finish it; the work seems

too heavy for me. I have to break off and betake myself to lighter

employments; such as the biographies of great men. The play of “St.

George and the Dragon,” over which I have burnt the midnight oil (you

must colour the thing by lamplight because that is how it will be seen),

still lacks most conspicuously, alas! two wings of the Sultan’s Palace,

and also some comprehensible and workable way of getting up the curtain.

All this gives me a feeling touching the real meaning of immortality.

In this world we cannot have pure pleasure. This is partly because

pure pleasure would be dangerous to us and to our neighbours. But it is

partly because pure pleasure is a great deal too much trouble. If I am

ever in any other and better world, I hope that I shall have enough

time to play with nothing but toy theatres; and I hope that I shall have

enough divine and superhuman energy to act at least one play in them

without a hitch.

.....

Meanwhile the philosophy of toy theatres is worth any one’s

consideration. All the essential morals which modern men need to learn

could be deduced from this toy. Artistically considered, it reminds us

of the main principle of art, the principle which is in most danger

of being forgotten in our time. I mean the fact that art consists of

limitation; the fact that art is limitation. Art does not consist in

expanding things. Art consists of cutting things down, as I cut down

with a pair of scissors my very ugly figures of St. George and the

Dragon. Plato, who liked definite ideas, would like my cardboard dragon;

for though the creature has few other artistic merits he is at least

dragonish. The modern philosopher, who likes infinity, is quite welcome

to a sheet of the plain cardboard. The most artistic thing about the

theatrical art is the fact that the spectator looks at the whole thing

through a window. This is true even of theatres inferior to my own; even

at the Court Theatre or His Majesty’s you are looking through a window;

an unusually large window. But the advantage of the small theatre

exactly is that you are looking through a small window. Has not every

one noticed how sweet and startling any landscape looks when seen

through an arch? This strong, square shape, this shutting off of

everything else is not only an assistance to beauty; it is the essential

of beauty. The most beautiful part of every picture is the frame.

This especially is true of the toy theatre; that, by reducing the scale

of events it can introduce much larger events. Because it is small it

could easily represent the earthquake in Jamaica. Because it is small it

could easily represent the Day of Judgment. Exactly in so far as it is

limited, so far it could play easily with falling cities or with falling

stars. Meanwhile the big theatres are obliged to be economical because

they are big. When we have understood this fact we shall have understood

something of the reason why the world has always been first inspired by

small nationalities. The vast Greek philosophy could fit easier into

the small city of Athens than into the immense Empire of Persia. In the

narrow streets of Florence Dante felt that there was room for Purgatory

and Heaven and Hell. He would have been stifled by the British Empire.

Great empires are necessarily prosaic; for it is beyond human power to

act a great poem upon so great a scale. You can only represent very big

ideas in very small spaces. My toy theatre is as philosophical as the

drama of Athens.

Tremendous Trifles · 第 28 / 46 题