Part I.--POLLINATION STUDIES OF SEED PRODUCTION.

UNSATISFACTORY YIELDS OF SWEET-CLOVER SEED.

In some sections of the country much trouble has been experienced for

a few years past in obtaining satisfactory yields of sweet-clover

seed. This difficulty has been due for the most part to the following

causes: (1) To cutting the plants at an improper stage of development,

(2) to the use of machinery not adapted to the handling of the crop,

(3) to the shedding of immature pods, and (4) possibly to the lack of

pollination. As the first two have been overcome, mainly because of a

better understanding of the requirements for handling this crop, the

subject matter of this bulletin is concerned primarily with the factors

which produce the third and fourth causes.

Where the production of seed was disappointing although the plants

produced an abundance of flowers, it has been observed that many

apparently were not fertilized, or if fertilized the pods aborted. In

order to obtain data in regard to the causes of the failure of sweet

clover to produce a normal seed yield, a study was made of the insects

which were most active in pollinating the flowers, the source of the

pollen necessary to effect fertilization, and the conditions under

which the flowers must be pollinated in order to become fertilized.

The relation of environmental conditions to the shedding of immature

pods was also investigated. In order to overcome local environmental

factors as much as possible, the experiments were conducted on the

Government Experiment Farm at Arlington, Va., and in cooperation with

the botanical department of the Iowa State College at Ames, Iowa.

PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS OF THE POLLINATION OF SWEET CLOVER.

Since Darwin (4, p. 360)[1] published the statement that a plant of

_Melilotus officinalis_ protected from insect visitation produced but

a very few seeds, while an unprotected plant produced many, other

scientists have investigated this subject. Knuth (19, v. 1, p. 37),

in giving a list of the best known cases of self-sterility in plants,

mentions _Melilotus officinalis_. The same author (19, v. 2, p. 282)

states that since the stigma projects beyond the anthers, automatic

self-pollination is difficult, and for the same reasons Müller (29, p.

180) believes that self-fertilization is not apt to occur.

[1] The serial numbers in parentheses refer to "Literature cited,"

pages 36-38.

In 1901 Kirchner (18, p. 7) covered a number of _Melilotus alba_

racemes with nets. On one of the plants 12 protected racemes produced

187 seeds and on another plant only one seed was obtained from

10 covered racemes. This experiment was duplicated in 1904, with

the result that 40 netted racemes produced an average of 38 seeds

each. Kirchner concluded from this experiment that spontaneous

self-pollination occurs regularly even though the stigma projects above

the anthers. He (18, p. 8) also performed an experiment with _Melilotus

officinalis_ in 1901. At this time 16 isolated racemes produced a total

of 11 seeds. This experiment was repeated in 1904, with the result

that 16 protected racemes produced an average of 14 seeds each. As

the racemes on one of the plants that was protected in 1904 died,

Kirchner concluded that the flowers of _M. officinalis_ were especially

sensitive to inclosure in nets and that the failures to obtain more

than a very few seeds on protected racemes in Darwin's experiment and

in his first experiment were due to this cause.

According to Kerner (17, v. 2, p. 399) the peas and lentils (Pisum and

Ervum) and the different species of horned clover and stone clover

(Lotus and Melilotus) as well as the numerous species of the genus

Trifolium and also many others produce seeds when insects are excluded

from the plants, and only isolated species of these genera gave poor

yields without insect visitation.

OUTLINE OF POLLINATING EXPERIMENTS.

The yield of sweet-clover seed varies greatly from year to year in many

parts of the United States. It has been assumed that this variation

was due to climatic conditions, as excellent seed crops were seldom

harvested in seasons of excessive rainfall or of prolonged drought just

preceding or during the flowering period. The lack of a sufficient

number of suitable pollinating insects also was thought to be an

important factor in reducing seed production. This was especially true

where the acreage of sweet clover was large and where few, if any,

honeybees were kept.

In order to obtain data upon the factors influencing the yield of

seed, a series of experiments was outlined to determine (1) whether

the flowers are able to set seed without the assistance of outside

agencies, (2) whether cross-pollination is necessary, (3) the different

kinds of insects which are active agents in pollinating sweet clover,

and (4) whether a relation exists between the quantity of moisture in

the soil and the production of seed.

The racemes containing the flowers which were to be pollinated by hand

were covered with tarlatan before any of the flowers opened and were

kept covered except while being pollinated until the seeds were nearly

mature. This cloth has about twice as many meshes to the linear inch as

ordinary mosquito netting and served to exclude all insects that are

able to pollinate the flowers. When entire plants were to be protected

from all outside agencies, cages covered with cheesecloth, glass

frames, or wire netting were used.

A preliminary study of the pollination of _Melilotus alba_ and _M.

officinalis_ showed that both were visited by the same kinds of insects

and that both required the same methods of pollination in order to set

seed. On this account _M. alba_ was used in most of the experiments

reported in this bulletin. Where _M. officinalis_ was employed it is so

stated.

STRUCTURE OF THE FLOWERS OF MELILOTUS ALBA.

[Illustration: Fig. 1.--Different parts of the flower of

_Melilotus alba_: 1, Side view of the flower; 2, side view of the

flower with the carina and alæ slightly depressed; 3, side view of the

flower, showing the carina and alæ depressed sufficiently to expose

the staminal tube and the tenth free stamen; 4, ala; 5, ate and carina

spread apart to show their relative position and shape; 6, flower after

the petals have been removed, showing in detail the calyx and staminal

tube; 7, the staminal tube split open to show the relative size and

position of the pistil, _a_, Alæ; _b_, vexillum; _c_, carina; _d_,

calyx; _c_, stigma; _b_, anthers: _g_, tenth free stamen; _h_, digitate

process of the superior basal angle of an ala; _i_, depressions in the

ala; _j_, staminal tube; _k_, pistil.]

The racemes of _Melilotus alba_ contain from 10 to 120 flowers with

an average of approximately 50 per raceme for all of the racemes of a

plant growing under cultivation in a field containing a good stand.

The flower consists of a green, smooth, or slightly pubescent calyx

with 5-pointed lobes and with an irregular white corolla of five

petals. (Fig. 1.) The claws of the petals are not united nor are they

attached to the staminal tube which is formed by the union of the

filaments of the nine inferior stamens. As the claws of the alæ and

carina are not attacked to the staminal tube; the petals may be bent

downward sufficiently far so that many different kinds of insects may

secure without difficulty the nectar secreted around the base of the

ovary.

The fingerlike processes of the alæ are appressed closely to the

carina, therefore the alæ are bent downward with the carina by insects.

These processes grasp the staminal tube superiorly and tightly when

the carina and alæ are in their natural positions, but when the carina

is pressed downward by insects the fingerlike processes open slightly

but not so far that they do not spring back to their original position

when the pressure is removed. The staminal tube splits superiorly to

admit the tenth free stamen. The filament of this superior stamen lies

along the side of this staminal tube. The filaments of the nine stamens

which compose the staminal tube separate in the hollow of the carina.

All stamens bear fertile anthers. The pistil is in the staminal tube,

the upper part of the style and stigma of which is inclosed with the

anthers in the carina. The stigma is slightly above the stamens.

An insect inserts its head into a sweet-clover flower between the

vexillum and carina, the stigma, therefore, comes into direct contact

with the head of the insect and cross-pollination is effected. At the

same time the anthers brush against the insect, so that its head is

dusted with pollen, to be carried to other flowers.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE FLORAL ORGANS OF SWEET CLOVER.

[Illustration: Fig. 2.--Lengthwise sectional view of a very

young flower of _Melilotus alba_, showing the relative development of

the stamens and pistil. In the upper set of stamens the divisions of

the mother cells are completed, while division is just beginning in

the lower set of stamens. In the ovules the outer integuments are well

started on their development, _a_, Anther; _o_, ovule; _p_, pistil. ×

38.]

The stamens of _Melilotus alba_ and _M. officinalis_ may be divided

into two sets, according to their length and time of development.

(Fig. 2.) The longer set extends about the length of the anthers

above the shorter set, and the pollen mother cells in the longer set

divide to form pollen grains at least two days earlier than those

in the shorter set. At the time the pollen mother cells divide, the

longer set of stamens is approximately three-eighths of a millimeter

in length and the pistil about half a millimeter long. The stigma and

a portion of the style project beyond the stamens, and this relative

position is maintained to maturity. The pollen mother cells undergo the

reduction division while the megaspore mother cells are just being

differentiated and while the outer integuments are barely prominent at

the base of the nucellus. The pollen grains are formed while the embryo

sac is beginning to develop. The division of the megaspore mother cell

does not occur until a number of days later, and the embryo sac is

not mature until the flower is nearly ready to open. Thus, the pollen

grains are formed a week to 10 days before the embryo sac is ready for

fertilization. The pollen grains increase in size and undergo internal

changes after their formation. These changes, which are not completed

until the flower is one-half or more of its mature length, may be

regarded as the ripening processes, and they are undoubtedly necessary

before the pollen is capable of functioning. For this reason it is

probable that the pollen grains are not able to function much before

the embryo sac is mature.

[Illustration: Fig. 3.--Stigma at the time of pollination,

showing its papillate character and the position of the pollen in

reference to the papillæ in pollination. × 175.]

The pistils of _Melilotus alba_ and _M. officinalis_ are straight for

the greater part of their length, but curve rather abruptly toward

the keel just below the capitate stigma. The surface of the stigma is

papillate. (Fig. 3.) In their reaction with Sudan III, alkanin, and

safranin the Walls of the papillæ of the stigma show that some fatlike

substances are present. Aside from water, the contents of the papillæ

consist chiefly of a fine emulsion of oil.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE OVULES.

The number of ovules in the ovary of _Melilotus alba_ varies from

two to five; however, most commonly, three or four ovules occur. In

_Melilotus officinalis_ the number in each ovary ranges from three to

six. In both species the ovules are campylotropous at maturity with the

micropylar end turned toward the base of the ovary.

Mature ovules contain two integuments, but the inner one does not close

entirely around the end of the nucellus. The outer integument develops

considerably ahead of the inner one. The outer integument is much

thickened at the micropylar end, the seed coat is formed from it, and

the inner integument is used as nourishment by the endosperm and embryo.

The number of megaspore mother cells in an ovule varies from one to

many. Two or more embryo sacs often start to develop in the same ovule,

but seldom more than one matures. (Pl. I, figs. 1, 2, and 3.) In

general, the development of the embryo sac proceeds in the ordinary

way, as described by Young (44, p. 133), with the inner megaspore

functioning. (Text fig. 4 and Pl. II, fig. 1.) In its development

the nucellus is destroyed rapidly, the destruction being most rapid

first at the micropylar end proceeding backward. The nucellus is

completely destroyed at the micropylar end by the time the embryo sac

is mature, and consequently the embryo sac comes in contact with the

outer integument in this region. (Pl. II, fig. 1.) As the destruction

of the nucellus extends toward the chalazal end the embryo sac becomes

much elongated and tubelike. The antipodals disappear early, so that

a mature embryo sac consists of the egg, the synergids, and the two

polars. The two polars lie in contact in the micropylar end of the sac

near the egg until fertilization.

STERILITY OF THE OVULES.

In _Melilotus alba_ and _M. officinalis_ there is very little tendency

toward sterility of ovules. In an extended study of ovules developing

under normal and under excessive moisture conditions only an occasional

one was found in which no reproductive cells were differentiated, and

no ovaries were found in which all of the ovules were sterile.

[Illustration: Fig. 4.--Median section through an ovule,

showing the embryo sac with four nuclei and the position of the

integuments. × 150.]

DEVELOPMENT OF THE POLLEN.

The pollen mother cells do not separate, but previous to the reduction

division the protoplasm shrinks from the walls, thus forming a dense

globular mass which often occupies less than half the lumen of the

mother cell. (Pl. I, fig. 4.) Nuclear division occurs while they are

in this contracted condition, and four nuclei are formed from two

successive divisions. The cytoplasm is equally distributed around each

nucleus. The four masses of protoplasm separate, and as they enlarge

a number of times and develop into mature pollen grains they become

binucleate, and a wall is gradually formed around each. (Pl. I, figs. 5

and 6.) At first the cytoplasm is quite dense and contains some starch

but no fatty oils. However, the cytoplasm of mature pollen grains is

vacuolate, and it contains a fatty oil in the form of an emulsion.

Soon after the pollen grains are formed, the walls of the mother cells

disappear, thus permitting the pollen grains to lie loose in the anther.

FERTILIZATION IN MELILOTUS ALBA.

The time intervening between pollination and fertilization was

investigated with both self-pollinated and cross-pollinated flowers.

In cross-pollination the parents were separate plants. This point was

investigated with plants out of doors during the summer of 1916 and

with plants in the greenhouse during the following winter. The time

elapsing between pollination and fertilization ranged from 50 to 55

hours and was not longer in the case of self-pollinated than with

cross-pollinated flowers. Furthermore, the rate of the development of

the embryo in each kind of pollination was studied and was found to

be as rapid in self-pollination as in cross-pollination. Therefore,

self-pollination is apparently as effective as cross-pollination in

_Melilotus alba_ so far as the vigor of pollen tubes and the rate at

which embryos develop are concerned. _Melilotus officinalis_ was not

studied in reference to this point.

Considerable difference often exists in the size of the young embryos

in the ovules of the same pod. This is due in part to a difference in

the time of fertilization, although some of it is due to a difference

in nourishment. It was observed that the ovule first fertilized might

be an upper one, lower one, or any one between these. Occasionally one

or more ovules are not fertilized.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE SEED.

A proembryo with a rather long suspensor is developed from the

fertilized egg. (Pl. II, fig. 2). The endosperm, which quite early

forms a peripheral layer around the entire embryo sac, develops most

rapidly about the embryo, which soon becomes thoroughly embedded in it.

(Pl. III, figs. 1 and 2.) After the embryo has used up the endosperm in

the micropylar end and has enlarged so much as to occupy nearly all of

the space in this region, the development of the endosperm becomes more

active in the chalazal end, and when the embryo is mature there is very

little endosperm left.

The seed coat begins to form about the time of fertilization,

although it apparently does not depend upon it, for in ovules where

fertilization is prevented the outer integument undergoes the early

modifications in the development of the seed coat before the ovule

breaks down. The development of the seed coat is apparent first at

the micropylar and chalazal ends, where the outer cells of the outer

integument become much elongated and their outer walls thicken very

soon after fertilization. The modifications in the development of

the seed coat extend around the ovule from these points, involving

at first only the outer or epidermal layer of cells which form the

malpighian layer. Later, the cells just beneath the malpighian layer

form the osteosclerid layer. Accompanying or closely following the

formation of the osteosclerid cells, the remaining cell layers of the

outer integument become modified into the nutritive and aleurone layer,

and the seed coat is fully formed. Meantime the inner integument is

practically all used as food.

Plate I.

[Illustration]

Development of the Ovules and Pollen in Sweet Clover.

Fig. 1.--Section through the nucellus of an ovule of

_Melilotus alba_, showing two megaspore mother cells. × 360. Fig.

2.--Median section through an ovule of _Melilotus alba_, showing the

two cells resulting from the first division of the megaspore mother

cell, and the relative development of the different parts of the ovule.

× 300. Fig. 3.--Section through the nucellus of an ovule of _Melilotus

alba_, showing two embryo sacs, one being more advanced than the other.

× 360. Fig. 4.--Protoplasm of the pollen mother cell of _Melilotus

alba_ contracted and ready to undergo division. × 560. Fig. 5.--Pollen

grains of _Melilotus alba_ just formed, showing their dense cytoplasm

and the presence of the mother-cell wall. × 560. Fig. 6.--_a_, Mature

pollen grain of _Melilotus alba_, showing the binucleate condition at

the time of shedding; _b_, surface view. × 560.

Plate II.

[Illustration]

Fig. 1.--Median Section through an Ovule of Melilotus alba.

The embryo sac is shown ready for fertilization. The egg and synergids

are in contact with the outer integument at the micropylar end. The

remains of the antipodals may be seen at the chalazal end. × 180.

[Illustration]

Fig. 2.--Section through an Ovule of Melilotus alba, about Three

Days After Fertilization.

The proembryo, the endosperm, and modifications of the integuments are

shown. At this stage the suspensor prominent part of the proembryo, and

the endosperm is most abundant around the embryo. The inner integument

is being rapidly destroyed, and the outer integument is beginning to

form the seed coat, as is indicated by the modifications in the outer

layer of its cells, which are elongating and thickening their outer

walls. × 33.

Plate III.

[Illustration]

Fig. 1.--Section of an Ovule of Melilotus alba after

Fertilization.

The stage of development is a little later than that shown in Plate II,

figure 2. The embryo is embedded deeply in endosperm tissue. × 45.

[Illustration]

Fig. 2.--Section through an Ovule of Melilotus alba after the

Embryo is Nearly Half Mature.

But little endosperm remains except in the chalazal end, and very

little remains of either the nucellus or inner integument. The

modifications which transform the outer integument into a seed coat are

well under way. Not only the outer layer of cells which becomes the

Malpighian layer is quite well modified, but also the layer beneath is

being transformed into the osteosclerid layer. × 30.

Plate IV.

[Illustration]

Stubble of Melilotus alba.

These plants, which were cut 12 inches above the ground during rainy

weather, had made a 40 to 42 inch growth. The stubble became infected

at the top and the light-colored portions of them were killed by

disease, thus checking the water supply to the growing branches above

the infection.

MATURE POLLEN OF SWEET CLOVER.

The pollen grains of _Melilotus alba_ and of _M. officinalis_ are quite

similar. Each grain contains three germ pores, and when viewed so

that the pores are visible they present a slightly angled appearance.

The average dimensions of the pollen of _Melilotus alba_ and of _M.

officinalis_ are 26 by 32 microns and 24 by 30 microns, respectively,

when measured in the positions shown in _b_ in Plate I, figure 6.

The walls of the pollen grains have cutin deposited in them, as shown

by their reactions with Sudan III, alkanin, safranin, and chloriodid of

zinc. The contents of the pollen grains give a distinct reaction when

tested for fat, and Millon's reagent shows that also some protein is

present. Tests for sugars and starch showed that these substances are

not present in perceptible quantities in mature pollen grains, although

some starch is present in immature pollen.

GERMINATION OF THE POLLEN.

The germination of the pollen of _Melilotus alba_ permits considerable

variation in moisture, as is illustrated in Table I.

Table I.--_Germination of the pollen of Melilotus alba in water and in

solutions of cane sugar of different strengths._

---------------+--------+---------------------------------------

| | Cane sugar in solution (per cent).

| Pure +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----

Melilotus alba.| water. | 8 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 30 | 35 | 45 | 55

---------------+--------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----

Germination | | | | | | | | |

of pollen | 33 | 23 | 64 | 46 | 60 | 46 | 31 | 22 | 0

per cent | | | | | | | | |

---------------+--------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----

The results given in Table I represent the average of 12 tests. Some

of the pollen grains burst in pure water and in the weak cane sugar

solutions, the percentage of bursting being greatest in pure water and

decreasing as the percentage of sugar in the solution was increased.

There was considerable variation in the percentages of germination in

both water and in the solutions of different strengths, and at times

there was very little bursting which was not accompanied by a high

percentage of germination. The pollen tubes grew as rapidly in water as

in any of the sugar solutions, some reaching a length of 100 microns

in six hours. As the pollen tubes made no more growth in the solutions

of sugar than in water, it is evident that the sugar is not used as

food, but helps in germination by reducing the rate at which water is

absorbed.

To judge from Table I, the pollen of sweet clover can be effective not

only under ordinary conditions but also when the flowers are wet with

rain or dew or when the stigma is so dry that in order to obtain water

from the papillæ the pollen must overcome a high resistance offered by

the sap of the papillæ, a resistance that may be equal to the osmotic

pressure of a 45 per cent solution of cane sugar. This is in accord

with results obtained under field conditions; as flowers that were

pollinated while rain was falling set seed satisfactorily, indicating

that a high percentage of humidity in the atmosphere does not check the

germination of the pollen sufficiently to interfere with fertilization.

Neither was the setting of seed affected when the soil about the roots

of plants was kept saturated with water, showing that the excessive

quantity of water in the stigmas resulting from an abundance of water

in the soil did not interfere with the fertilization of the flowers.

No definite counts were made of the germination of the pollen of

_Melilotus officinalis_ in the solutions of cane sugar of different

strengths, but observations show that the moisture requirement of the

pollen of this species is approximately the same as that of _Melilotus

alba_.

CROSS-POLLINATION AND SELF-POLLINATION OF SWEET CLOVER.

Results published by previous investigators on the cross-pollination

and self-pollination of sweet clover do not agree. The experiments of

Darwin (4) show that the flowers are self-pollinated to only a small

extent. On the other hand, Kirchner (18) and Kerner (17) find that

self-pollination occurs generally and that cross-pollination is not

necessary for the production of seed. However, all investigators agree

that many different kinds of insects are able to pollinate sweet clover.

Because of the diverse opinions as to the pollination of sweet clover,

a number of experiments were conducted to determine (1) whether insect

visitation was necessary to pollinate the flowers, (2) if necessary,

whether the flowers must be cross-pollinated, and (3) what insects are

active agents as pollinators of sweet clover.

ARTIFICIAL MANIPULATION OF SWEET-CLOVER FLOWERS.[2]

[2] The writers wish to acknowledge their indebtedness to Mr. Carl

Kurtzweil for assistance in conducting part of the field experiments at

Ames.

Experiments were conducted to determine, if possible, the effect of

various types of artificial manipulation of sweet-clover flowers when

in full bloom on the production of seed. Only healthy, vigorous plants

growing on well-drained soil were selected for these experiments.

Before any of the flowers were open, the individual racemes were

covered with tarlatan and labeled. (Fig. 5.) As soon as part of the

flowers opened, the racemes were uncovered and after removing all

flowers that were not open the open flowers were pollinated and the

racemes re-covered. If the flowers of sweet clover are not fertilized

they will remain open for two to three days, then wither, and in a

short time drop. But after being fertilized the ovules enlarge very

rapidly, and the corollas usually drop in about seven or eight days.

Therefore, all fertilized flowers can be distinguished a few days after

fertilization has taken place. Counts were made of the number of pods

which formed in 10 to 12 days after pollination. An outline of the

experiments is given in Table II.

[Illustration: Fig. 5.--Individual racemes of white sweet

clover covered with cheesecloth to protect them from insect visitation.]

Table II.--_Treatment of sweet-clover flowers in the

artificial-manipulation experiments._

------------+---------------------------------------------------------

Experiment. | Method of pollinating the flowers.

------------+---------------------------------------------------------

A | Check--covered.

|

B | Check--open to insect visitation at all times.

|

C | A separate toothpick was used to spring the keel of each

| flower on the raceme.

|

D | One toothpick was used to spring the keels of all the

| flowers on a raceme.

|

E | Cross-pollinated.

|

F | Raceme rolled several times between thumb and finger.

------------+---------------------------------------------------------

As insects, and especially honeybees, usually visit all recently

opened flowers on a raceme, experiments C and D were conducted to

determine whether more seed would be produced when pollen from other

flowers on the same raceme was placed on the stigmas of the flowers

than when only the pollen produced by each flower was placed on its

own stigma. The effect of pollination when only the pollen produced by

an individual flower was placed on its own stigmas was also obtained

in experiment F, as by this method of pollination no pollen was

transferred from one flower to another. It can not be stated definitely

that the seed produced by the cross-pollinated flowers was the result

of fertilization with foreign pollen, as the anthers were not removed

from the flowers pollinated because it would be necessary to remove

the anthers when the flowers were not more than two-thirds mature, and

in doing this the flowers would be so mutilated that only occasionally

would pollination at this time or at a later date be effective. The

flowers listed in experiment E were pollinated a short time before they

opened, and in each case pollen taken from flowers of other plants

was placed on the stigmas. The petals of the cross-pollinated flowers

were not mutilated, and in each case they returned to their original

positions soon after pollination. The results obtained in experiment B,

where the racemes were simply labeled and left open to the action of

insects at all times, serve for comparison with other experiments where

the flowers were protected from insect visitation and were artificially

manipulated.

Martin (25) found the setting of alfalfa seed and Westgate (40)

found the setting of red-clover seed to be affected by an excessive

quantity of moisture in the soil or atmosphere. In order to overcome

the possible effect of this or of other detrimental factors, in each

experiment only the flowers on a certain number of racemes were

pollinated at one time. All of the experiments were repeated a number

of times during the months of July and August, 1916, and the results

given in Table III show the total number of flowers pollinated and the

number of pods that formed during the two months.

The results presented in Table III show that flowers fertilized with

pollen transferred from another plant produced a higher percentage

of pods than any of the other treatments. The results obtained in

experiment D, where the same toothpick was used to spring the keels

of all the flowers on a raceme, show that this method of pollination

produced an average of 7.24 pods per raceme more than the racemes in

experiment C. where a separate toothpick was used for each flower.

These results indicate that pollen transferred from one flower to

another on the same raceme is more effective than when the pollen

produced by an individual flower is used to fertilize its own stigma.

However, the results of experiment C prove that self-pollination

is effective in _Melilotus alba_. In experiment B. which was the

open check, 4.3 per cent more flowers set seed than on the racemes

where the same toothpick was used to spring all the keels, but 11.57

per cent more seed was obtained than in experiment C. Spontaneous

self-pollination occurs to only a very small extent, as will be seen

from the results of experiment A, in which an average of only 2.9 per

cent of the flowers set seed.

Table III.--_Effect of different types of artificial

manipulation on the seed production of sweet clover at Arlington, Va.,

and at Ames, Iowa, in 1916._

----------+--------+---------------------------+-------------------

| | Total number of-- | Flowers that set

| | | seed (per cent).

| Experi-+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------

Location. | ment. |Racemes.|Flowers.|Pods set.| At each |

| | | | | station.| Average.

----------+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------

| | | | | |

Arlington | A | 49 | 3,510 | 144 | 4.1 |} 2.9

Ames | A | 84 | 4,536 | 92 | 2.0 |}

| | | | | |

Arlington | B | 100 | 5,599 | 3,973 | 70.95 |} 66.51

Ames | B | 196 | 1,276 | 600 | 47.02 |}

| | | | | |

Arlington | C | 50 | 1,229 | 701 | 57.03 |} 54.94

Ames | C | 75 | 289 | 133 | 46.02 |}

| | | | | |

Arlington | D | 50 | 1,480 | 936 | 63.24 |} 62.18

Ames | D | 88 | 575 | 342 | 59.47 |}

| | | | | |

Arlington | E | 31 | 377 | 307 | 81.43 |} 70.10

Ames | E | 48 | 175 | 80 | 45.71 |}

| | | | | |

Arlington | F | 30 | 933 | 524 | 56.16 |.........

----------+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------

SEED PRODUCTION OF MELILOTUS ALBA UNDER ORDINARY FIELD CONDITIONS.

The production of seed of _Melilotus alba_ under ordinary field

conditions varies considerably, not only in different parts of the

country but also on different fields in the same region. A number

of factors contribute to this variation, one of the most important

of which appears to be the inability of the plant to supply all the

developing seed with sufficient moisture, causing some of them to

abort. As pointed out on page 22 this condition was very marked in

certain parts of the country in 1916. However, poor seed production

is not always correlated with lack of moisture, for the seed crop

was a failure in 1915, where cloudy and rainy weather prevailed much

of the time the plants were in bloom. It is believed that the lack

of pollination by insects was the principal cause for the failure of

seed to set, as very few insects visit sweet-clover flowers when such

conditions prevail. As sweet-clover pollen will germinate in pure

water and as plants which have their roots submerged in water set seed

abundantly when pollinated, the failure of the seed crop in 1915 was

not due to excessive moisture.

As a rule, thin stands of sweet clover produce more seed to the acre

than thick stands and isolated plants more seed than those growing

in either a thick or thin stand. The correlation of seed production

with the thickness of stand is probably due to the shading and partial

prevention of insect visitation to part of the racemes on the lower

branches. Most of the flowers upon the lower branches of isolated

plants are directly exposed to sunlight and to insect visits: therefore

the racemes on these branches produce as large a percentage of seed as

the racemes on the upper branches. In a thick stand, little seed is

produced by racemes on the lower branches.

A plant approximately 3 feet high growing close to the center of

a field at Arlington. Va., in which was an average stand of four

sweet-clover plants to the square foot was selected in order to

determine the number of racemes produced and the average number of

seeds to the raceme. This plant produced 196 racemes, which contained

an average of 20.4 pods each. The racemes varied from 2 to 10 cm. in

length, and the number of pods to the raceme ranged from to 75. The

racemes on the upper and most exposed portions of the plants were

larger and the flowers produced a much higher percentage of pods than

the racemes close to the bases of the larger branches. Many of the

small racemes on the lower branches produced less than five pods each.

The data obtained from the two plants at Arlington that were protected

from night-flying insects may also be cited here, as the results of

that experiment show that night-flying insects are not an important

factor in the production of sweet-clover seed, and, further. because

they were growing under the same conditions, in the same plat, and were

approximately of the same size. These two plants produced a total of

544 racemes, with an average of 20.9 pods each. The number of pods to

the raceme varied from to 86.

EFFICIENCY OF CERTAIN KINDS OF INSECTS AS POLLINATORS OF SWEET CLOVER.

In order further to test the self-sterility of sweet clover and to

determine the relative efficiency of night-flying and of different

kinds of day-flying insects as pollinators of the flowers, a number

of cages covered with cheesecloth, glass, or wire screen having 14

meshes to the linear inch were placed over plants at Arlington. Va.,

and at Ames. Iowa, in July and August. 1916. The bases of the cages

were buried several inches in the ground, so that insects could not

pass under them. Cheesecloth was used to cover most of the cages and

was made into sacks of such a size that they could be put on or removed

from the frames of the cages without difficulty. It was stretched

tightly over the frames and fastened to their bases with laths.

A cage having two sides and the top of glass but with ends covered with

cheesecloth to permit ventilation was used at Ames to protect a number

of plants from insect visitation at all times. The purpose of this

cage was to determine whether the partial shading of the plants in the

cages covered with cheesecloth would have any effect upon the setting

of seed.

The cage covered with wire netting having 14 meshes to the linear inch

was used to determine the efficiency as pollinators of sweet clover of

insects so small that they could pass through openings of this size.

The plants used in the experiments at Arlington were growing close to

the center of a field of sweet clover. Volunteer plants in a field

that contained only a scattering stand were used at Ames. The cages

were placed over the plants in all of these experiments before any of

the flowers opened, and the work was continued until they were through

blooming.

PLANTS SUBJECT TO INSECT VISITATION AT ALL TIMES.

A plant subject to insect visits at all times and growing in the same

plat as those inclosed in the cages at Arlington was selected as a

check to those inclosed in the cages during their entire flowering

period or for only a portion of it. This plant, which was in bloom at

the same time as those inclosed in the cages, produced 196 racemes with

an average of 20.4 pods each. As all of the racemes were collected and

as those on the lower portions of the plant were smaller than those

on the upper branches, the average number of seeds per raceme is much

lower than it would have been if only the larger racemes had been

collected.

An isolated plant that was subject to insect visits at all times was

selected for a check to the cage work conducted at Ames. This was

necessary in order to get results that would be comparable with those

obtained from the plants inclosed in the cages, as the cage experiments

at Ames were conducted with isolated plants. The plant produced 239

racemes, with an average of 41.6 pods.

PLANTS PROTECTED FROM INSECT VISITATION DURING THEIR ENTIRE FLOWERING

PERIOD.

On July 3, 1916, a cage 3 feet square and 3½ feet high, covered with

cheesecloth, was placed over three sweet-clover plants at Arlington.

(Fig. 6.) This cage was not opened until August 3, when practically

all of the racemes had passed the flowering stage and the few seeds

that formed on some of them were practically mature. The three plants

inclosed in the cage produced 904 racemes, with an average of 0.63 pod

each. No pods were produced on 594 racemes, while 150 produced but one

each. None of the racemes produced more than five pods.

This experiment was duplicated at Ames in August, 1916, with the result

that the three protected plants produced a total of 776 racemes, with

an average of 0.19 pod each.

[Illustration: Fig. 6.--Cage covered with cheesecloth to

protect plants from insect visitation.]

The plants inclosed at Arlington produced 0.44 pod to the raceme more

than the plants inclosed at Ames, and the average for the six plants

at Arlington and at Ames is only 0.42 pod to the raceme. Results given

below for nine plants inclosed in the glass-covered cage show that the

pods produced per raceme by different plants varied from 0.1 to 0.45,

which is slightly less than the variation in the two cages covered with

cheese-cloth.

In order to determine whether the shading of the plants in the

cheesecloth-covered cages had caused the production of seed to be

reduced, a cage 4 feet wide, 4 feet high, and 10 feet long, having

glass sides and top, but with ends covered with cheesecloth to permit

ventilation, was placed over nine plants at Ames in August, 1916. The

results obtained in this experiment are presented in Table IV.

Table IV.--_Production of sweet-clover seed by plants

protected from insect visitation during their entire flowering period

at Ames, Iowa, in 1916._

| Racemes | Pods produced | Average number of

Plant. | per plant.| by all racemes. | pods to the raceme.

----------+-----------+-----------------+-------------------

| | |

No. 1 | 84 | 17 | 0.20

No. 2 | 130 | 58 | .44

No. 3 | 166 | 30 | .18

No. 4 | 199 | 88 | .44

No. 5 | 243 | 35 | .27

No. 6 | 131 | 36 | .27

No. 7 | 119 | 13 | .10

No. 8 | 182 | 83 | .45

No. 9 | 340 | 142 | .41

+-----------+-----------------+-------------------

Total | 1,594 | 592 | .......

Average | | | .31

----------+-----------+-----------------+-------------------

The results given in Table IV show that an average of 0.31 of a pod

to the raceme was obtained from 1,594 racemes and that the variation

in seed production of the different plants was from 0.1 to 0.45 to

the raceme. The average seed production for the nine plants is 0.11

seed to the raceme less than the average results obtained from the six

plants that were covered with cheesecloth. As this difference is well

within the limit of variation for individual plants, it may be stated

that the shading of the plants in the cheesecloth-covered cages did not

reduce the production of seed. The results of this experiment show that

spontaneous self-pollination does not occur regularly, as stated by

Kirchner.

FLOWERS POLLINATED ONLY BY NIGHT-FLYING INSECTS.

In order to determine the importance of night-flying insects as

pollinators, two cheesecloth-covered cages 3 feet square and 3½

feet high were placed over sweet-clover plants at Arlington on July

10, 1916. The covers of the cages were removed each evening at 7:30

and replaced each morning at 4:30 o'clock. Practically all the flowers

on these plants had bloomed by August 2, and the seed produced was

nearly mature. The few racemes that contained opened flowers or buds

were discarded. The three plants in one cage produced 723 racemes,

with an average of 3.76 pods each, while the one plant in the other

cage produced 227 racemes, with an average of 3.58 pods to the raceme.

The four plants, therefore, produced a total of 950 racemes, with an

average of 3.71 pods each. The only night-flying insect found working

on sweet clover while these plants were in bloom was _Diacrisia

virginica_ Fabr.

This experiment was duplicated at Ames in August, 1916, with the result

that one plant subject to visitation only by night-flying insects

produced 486 racemes, with an average of 16.5 pods each.

The results obtained in these experiments show that night-flying

insects were much more active in pollinating sweet clover at Ames than

at Arlington. However, as the results obtained from the plants subject

to visitation by day-flying insects only were practically the same as

those obtained from plants which were subject to insect visitation at

all times, it is concluded that night-flying insects were not a factor

in the pollination of sweet clover at Arlington or at Ames in 1916.

FLOWERS POLLINATED ONLY BY DAY-FLYING INSECTS.

A cheesecloth-covered cage, 3 feet square and 3½ feet high, was

placed on July 7, 1916, over two sweet-clover plants at Arlington,

before any of the flowers opened. As the cover of this cage was

removed at 7.30 a. m. and replaced at 4.30 p. m. each day during the

experiment, the plants were subject to visitation by day-flying insects

only. As soon as all of the flowers on most of the racemes had bloomed,

and before any mature pods shattered, the racemes were removed from the

plants and the pods produced by each raceme counted. The two plants

produced a total of 544 racemes, with an average of 20.9 pods each.

This experiment was also conducted at Ames. One plant was protected

from insect visitation at night in August, 1916, with the result that

it produced 418 racemes, with an average of 41.11 pods each.

PLANTS PROTECTED FROM ALL INSECTS THAT COULD NOT PASS THROUGH A WIRE

SCREEN HAVING 14 MESHES TO THE LINEAR INCH.

It is well known that many small insects, and especially those

belonging to the family Syrphidæ and to the genus Halictus, frequent

sweet-clover flowers, but no records have been noted that show how

important these insects are as pollinators of this plant. In order to

obtain data on this subject a cage 12 feet square and 6½ feet high,

made of wire screen having 14 meshes to the linear inch, was placed

over a few plants at Ames, in July, 1916, before they began to bloom.

The base of the cage was buried several inches in the soil, so that

no insects could get into it. As these plants were growing in a field

where there was a sufficient supply of moisture at all times, they

made a growth of 5 to 6 feet. For this reason all the racemes were

collected from only a portion of one of the plants instead of from

the entire plant, as was done with the smaller ones inclosed in the

cheesecloth-covered cages. The branches selected contained 224 racemes,

with an average of 24.53 pods each. Many insects that were able to pass

through the wire netting were observed working on the flowers of the

inclosed plants.

A check plant, subject to visitation by all insects and growing within

a few yards of the cage, contained 264 racemes, with an average of

28.23 pods each.

This experiment shows that small insects are efficient pollinators

of sweet clover and that the plant to which all insects had access

produced an average of only 3.7 pods to the raceme more than the

one inclosed in the cage. As these plants were growing close to a

strip of timber and some distance from a field of sweet clover, it

is probable that more small insects worked on the flowers than would

have been the case if the cage had been located in the center of a

field of sweet clover. Though these results show that small insects

are able to pollinate sweet-clover flowers freely, it is very doubtful

whether insects of this kind would be numerous enough to pollinate

sufficient flowers in a large field of sweet clover for profitable

seed production. The honeybee is the most efficient pollinator of this

plant, and it is believed that in many sections it is responsible for

the pollination of more than half of the flowers.

SUMMARY OF INSECT-POLLINATION STUDIES.

The data secured in the different experiments where sweet-clover

flowers were subject to insect visitation at one time or another are

presented in detail in Table V.

Table V.--_Summary of the insect pollination studies conducted

at Arlington, Va., and Ames, Iowa, in 1916._

----------+-------+-------------------------+----------------------------

| | | Number of--

|Number | +--------+---------+---------

Location. | of | Method of treatment. |Racemes.| Pods |Pods per

|plants.| | |produced.| raceme,

| | | | | average.

----------+-------+-------------------------+--------+---------+---------

Arlington.| 1 |Check--subject to insect | 196 | 4,013 | 20.47

| | visitation at all times.| | |

Ames. | 1 | do. | 239 | 9,943 | 41.60

Arlington.| 3 |Protected from all | 904 | 577 | .63

| | insects. | | |

Ames. | 12 | do. | 2,370 | 653 | .27

Arlington.| 3 |Visited by night-flying | 723 | 2,720 | 3.76

| | insects only (cage 1). | | |

Do. | 1 |Visited by night-flying | 227 | 152 | .67

| | insects only (cage 2). | | |

Ames. | 1 |Visited by night-flying | 486 | 8,024 | 16.51

| | insects only. | | |

Arlington.| 2 |Visited by day-flying | 544 | 11,397 | 20.95

| | insects only. | | |

Ames. | 1 | do. | 418 | 17,186 | 41.11

Do. | 9 |Protected from all | 1,594 | 502 | .31

| | insects. | | |

----------+-------+-------------------------+--------+---------+---------

The results in Table V show that an average of 0.37 pod to the raceme

was obtained from the plants protected from visitation by all insects

during the flowering period. As the racemes of _Melilotus alba_ will

average approximately 50 flowers each, less than 1 per cent of them

set seed without being pollinated by insects. The results obtained in

the cages in which only night-flying insects had access to the flowers

show that these insects pollinate sweet clover to a slight extent,

but that the number of pods produced by them is so few that it may be

assumed that these flowers would have been pollinated by day-flying

insects. This assumption is borne out by the results obtained in the

cages where only day-flying insects had access to the flowers, as the

results obtained in these cages at Arlington and Ames, respectively,

are approximately the same as those obtained on the plants subject

to insect visitation at all times. It will be noted that the yield

of seed on the plants visited by insects at Ames is much higher than

that of the plants subjected to insect visits during the same period

at Arlington. This difference in seed yield may be attributed to the

fact that isolated plants were used in the experiments at Ames, and

at Arlington the experiments were conducted with plants growing under

field conditions.

RELATION OF THE POSITION OF THE FLOWERS ON MELILOTUS ALBA PLANTS TO

SEED PRODUCTION.

Observations of sweet-clover plants grown under cultivation, and

especially when the stands were thick, showed that the flowers of the

racemes on the upper and exposed branches produced a larger percentage

of seed than those on the lower branches which were less exposed. It is

thought by some that the failure of the flowers on the lower racemes

to be fertilized is due to shading; but the results obtained in the

cheesecloth and glass covered cages do not warrant this belief, as it

is doubtful whether the shading of the flowers on the lower racemes is

more than that caused by the cheesecloth. It is probably the lack of

pollination that causes this decrease in seed production on the lower

branches of plants growing close together, as a vast number of flowers

open each day on portions of the plants which are exposed directly to

visitation by insects and are therefore more accessible to them.

In order to obtain information upon the number of flowers that produce

seed on the upper and lower portions, respectively, of sweet-clover

plants when grown under field conditions and where the stand contained

four to five plants to the square foot, a number of racemes were

labeled on different portions of the plants at Ames in 1915 and 1916.

When the pods were partly mature, records were made of the number of

flowers that produced pods. The results obtained are given in Table VI.

Table VI.--_Relation of the position of sweet-clover flowers

on the plants to seed production, at Ames, Iowa, in 1915 and 1916._

-----+------------------------+---------+------------------------------

| | | Pods formed.

| |Number of+--------+------------+--------

Year.|Position of the flowers.| flowers.| Number.| Percentage.| Average.

-----+------------------------+---------+--------+------------+--------

| | | | |

1915 | Upper half of plants | 812 | 357 | 43.9 } |

1916 | do | 261 | 101 | 38.7 } | 42.6

| | | | |

1915 | Lower half of plants | 344 | 44 | 12.7 } |

1916 | do | 216 | 59 | 27.3 } | 18.3

-----+------------------------+---------+--------+------------+--------

The flowers on the upper racemes of the plants produced 31.2 per cent

more pods than those on the lower racemes in 1915. and 11.4 per cent

more in 1916. These results prove that insects more frequently visit

the flowers that are directly exposed and are therefore more accessible.

INFLUENCE OF THE WEATHER AT BLOSSOMING TIME UPON SEED PRODUCTION.

The seed production of sweet clover is seldom satisfactory when rainy

or muggy weather prevails during the flowering period. In order to

obtain data as to the relation existing between the visits of insects

and the prevailing weather conditions, a record of insect visits and

of the number of flowers that opened each day was kept for a period of

nine days at Ames in August, 1915.

In this experiment the racemes were marked early each morning just

above the last flowers which had opened the previous day, and early

the following morning the number of flowers which had opened the

previous day was noted. The number of flowers that were pollinated was

determined by the number of pods that formed. Table VII gives in detail

the results obtained.

Table VII.--_Influence of the weather at blossoming time upon

the yield of sweet -clover seed, at Ames. Iowa, in 1915._

-------+-------------------------+---------+-------+-------+-----------

| | |Number | |

| | | of | | Percentage

Date, | Weather conditions. | Insect |flowers| Pods | of flowers

1915. | |visitors.| that |formed.| that

| | |opened.| | matured.

-------+-------------------------+---------+-------+-------+-----------

Aug. 16|Cloudy and showery | Very few| 102 | 18 | 17.6

Aug. 17|Rain all day | None | 69 | 4 | 5.7

Aug. 18|Cloudy most of the day | Very few| 60 | 20 | 33.3

Aug. 19|Clear and cool | Numerous| 94 | 53 | 56.3

Aug. 20|Mostly clear and warm | do | 61 | 38 | 62.2

Aug. 21|Clear and warm | do | 81 | 44 | 54.3

Aug. 22|Partly cloudy and warm |} | | |

Aug. 23| do |} do | 181 | 100 | 55.2

Aug. 24|Cloudy till mid-afternoon| Few | 37 | 12 | 32.4

-------+-------------------------+---------+-------+-------+-----------

The data given in Table VII show that the percentage of effective

pollination is much higher in clear weather, when insects are active,

than in cloudy or rainy weather, when but few insects visit the flowers.

INSECT POLLINATORS OF SWEET CLOVER.

On account of the ease with which the heavy flow of nectar of

sweet-clover flowers may be obtained many insects visit the flowers,

thereby pollinating them. While the useful insect visitors of flowers

of red clover are limited to a few species of Hymenoptera, those

pollinating sweet-clover blossoms are many and belong to such orders as

Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera, as well as to the Hymenoptera.

However, in the United States the honeybee is the most important

pollinator of sweet clover. In many parts of the country the different

species of Halictus, commonly known as sweat bees, rank next in

importance. The margined soldier beetles (_Chauliognathus marginatus_

Fabr.) were very active pollinators at Arlington, Va., in the latter

part of June and first part of July, 1916, but the woolly bear

(_Diacrisia virginica_ Fabr.) was the only night-flying insect found

working on sweet clover at Arlington.

Insects belonging to the genera Halictus, Syritta, and Paragus were

very active pollinators at Ames, Iowa, in 1916, and ranked next in

importance to the honeybee. In fact, the results obtained in the

cage where the plants were protected from visitation by insects that

could not pass through a screen having 14 meshes to the linear inch

showed that these small insects were able under the conditions of that

experiment to pollinate practically as many flowers as larger insects.

The insects listed below were collected while visiting _Melilotus alba_

and _M. officinalis_ flowers in 1916.

AT ARLINGTON, VA.

_Neuroptera._--_Perithemis domitia_ Dru., _Enallagma_ sp.

_Hemiptera._--_Adelphocoris rapidus_ Say, _Lygus pratensis_ Linn,

(tarnished plant bug).

_Coleoptera._--_Chauliognathus marginatus_ Fabr. (margined soldier

beetle), _Diabrotica 12-punctata_ Oliv. (southern corn rootworm).

_Lepidoptera._--_Pieris protodice_ Bd. (imported cabbage butterfly),

_Heodes hypophleas_ Bd., _Lycaena comyntas_ Gdt., _Hylephila

campestris_ Bd., _Scepsis fulvicollis_ Hubn., _Ancyloxypha numitor_

Fabr., _Pholisora catullus_ Fabr., _Pyraustid_ sp., _Loxostege

similalis_ Gn. (garden webworm), _Thecla melinus_ Hubn., _Colias

philodice_ Gdt. (the common sulphur butterfly), _Tarachidia

caudefactor_ Hubn., _Pyrameis atalanta_ Linn., Drasteria (2 species),

_Diacrisia virginica_ Fabr. (the woolly bear).

_Hymenoptera._--_Halictus lerouxi_ Lep., _H. provancheri_ (sweat

bee), _H. pectoralis_ Sm. (sweat bee), Halictus (3 unidentified

species), _H. legatus_ Say, _Bombus affinis_ Cr., _B. impatiens_

Harris (bumblebee), _Melissodes bimaculata_ Lep., _Polistes pallipes_

Lep. (paper wasp), _Megachile_ sp. (leaf-cutter bee), _Coelioxys

octodentata_ Say, _Xylocopa virginica_ Drury (common carpenter bee),

_Pompiloides_ sp., _Apis mellifica_ Linn, (honeybee), _Philanthus

punctatus_ Say, _Sphex nigricans_ Dahlb. (caterpillar hawk), _S.

pictipennis_ Walsh (caterpillar hawk).

_Diptera._--_Archytas analis_ Fabr., _Chrysomyia macellaria_ Fabr.

(screw-worm fly),. _Pollenia rudis_ Fabr. (cluster fly), _Ocyptera

carolinae_ Desv., _Trichophora ruficauda_ V. D. W., _Eristalis

arbustorum_ Linn., _Physocephala tibialis_ Say.

AT AMES, IOWA.

_Hemiptera._--_Lygus pratensis_ Linn., _Adelphocoris rapidus_ Say,

_Coleoptera._--_Coccinella transversoguttata_ Fabr.

_Lepidoptera._--_Eurymus eurytheme_ Bdv., _Chrysophanus_ sp., Lycaena

(2 species),. _Libythea bachmani_ Kirtland, _Pieris rapae_ Linn.

_Hymenoptera._--_Angochlora_ sp., _Apis mellifica_ Linn., _Colletes_

sp., _Halictus lerouxi_ Lep., _H. provancheri_ D. J., _Halictus_ sp.,

_Elis_ sp., _Calliopsis andreniformis_ Smith, _Polistes_ sp., _Sphex_

sp., _Eumenes fraterna_ Say, _Sceliphron_ sp., _Isodontia harrisi_,

Fern., _Cerceris_ sp., _Oxybelus_ sp.

_Diptera._--_Syritta_ sp., _Paragus_ sp., _Chrysomyia macellaria_

Desv., Syrphidæ (2 unidentified specimens).

EFFECT OF MOISTURE UPON THE PRODUCTION OF MELILOTUS ALBA SEED.

Careful inspection of a number of sweet-clover fields in Iowa and

Illinois in the autumn of 1916 indicated that many plants were unable

to obtain sufficient moisture for the proper development of their

flowers. Examination of flowers that aborted shortly after reaching

their mature size showed that the anther sacs had not burst, even

though the pollen grains were mature. Apparently for the same reason

many immature pods aborted. The precipitation for July, 1916, in

Livingston County, Ill., where the sweet-clover seed crop suffered

materially for lack of moisture, was 3.2 inches less than normal, while

the temperature was 4.5° F. above normal. In August the precipitation

was 0.96 of an inch below normal and the temperature 4.2° F. above

normal. At Ames, Iowa, the precipitation was 3.54 inches below

normal and the temperature 5.4° F. above normal in July. Both the

precipitation and temperature were about normal at Ames in August, but

most of the precipitation fell before the experiments were commenced.

In north-central Illinois the seed production of sweet clover was

very irregular. Some fields produced an abundance of seed, while a

large percentage of the pods on the plants in other fields near by,

where the thickness of the stand, size of the plants, and conditions

in general were approximately the same, aborted. It was evident that

all stands producing a good seed crop were growing on well-drained

soil and that those which were not yielding satisfactorily were on

poorly drained land. It is well known that sweet clover will produce

deep taproots only when the plants are growing in well-drained soil

and that a much-branched surface root system will be formed on poorly

drained land, and especially when there is an excess of moisture or a

high water table during the first season's growth. During this droughty

period in 1916 the upper layer of soil became so depleted of moisture

that the plants with surface root systems were unable to obtain

sufficient water to mature their seed. On the other hand, the lack of

precipitation and the high temperatures did not affect the moisture

content of the subsoil sufficiently to interfere with the normal seed

production of deep-rooted plants. According to Lutts (22, p. 47) this

same condition was found to be true in Ohio in 1916.

As a rule, under droughty conditions the second crop of sweet clover

will produce a higher yield of seed than the first crop, as the second

growth of the plants is seldom more than half as much as the first,

thereby requiring less moisture. However, if showery hot weather

prevails when the first crop is cut, the end of each stub is very apt

to become infected, usually with a species of Fusarium, which kills all

the cortex as far back as the upper bud or young shoot and that part

of it on the opposite side of this bud to the bud below. If the second

bud from the top of a stub is not directly opposite the upper one the

decay may extend nearly to the ground. (Pl. IV.) The destruction of

half to two-thirds of the cortex from 2 to 4 inches below the upper bud

materially reduces the quantity of water that can be conveyed to the

branch above the base of the dead area. Plants thus infected obtain

sufficient moisture for seed production only under the most favorable

conditions. When the first crop is cut during warm dry weather, and

especially when the first crop has not been permitted to make more than

a 30 to 32 inch growth, the stubble seldom decays, and in no instance

have the plants been observed to decay as far back as the upper buds.

An experiment was conducted at Ames in the latter part of August and

first part of September, 1916, to determine the effect of watering

plants that were aborting a large percentage of their flowers and

immature pods. For this purpose several volunteer plants growing in

a meadow were selected. A hole 12 inches square and 14 inches deep

was dug 8 inches from the crown of one plant, and each evening during

the experiment 2 gallons of water were poured into the hole. The top

of the hole was kept covered, so as to check evaporation from it as

much as possible. Another plant of the same size and growing about 15

yards from the watered plant served as a check. On both plants many

of the flowers and immature buds were aborting at the beginning of

the experiment. The soil in this field was so depleted of moisture

that the leaves of the plants wilted during the hottest part of the

days preceding the experiment. The foliage on the check plant wilted

each day for the first five days of the experiment. On the sixth day

0.96 of an inch of rain fell and four days later 0.23 of an inch

more. The dropping of the flowers was temporarily checked by these

precipitations, but owing to the dry, compact condition of the soil

the rain was not sufficient to check entirely the fall of flowers and

immature pods. At the beginning of the experiment the racemes on both

plants were divided into three classes, according to the development of

the flowers, and labeled. They were collected and the seeds counted as

soon as the pods at the bases of the racemes commenced to turn brown.

Table VIII presents the results obtained.

Table VIII.--_Effect of water upon the seed production of

sweet clover when growing under droughty conditions at Ames, Iowa, in

1916._

------------------------+-------------------------------------+---------

|Plant not watered.| Plant watered. |

+--------+---------+--------+---------+

| | Average | | Average |

Stage of development | Number |number of| Number |number of|Increase

when labeled. | of |pods per | of |pods per | from

|racemes | raceme |racemes | raceme |watering.

|labeled.| that |labeled.| that |

| | matured.| | matured.|

------------------------+--------+---------+--------+---------+---------

Flowers at the base of | | | | |

the racemes just ready| 49 | 27.39 | 110 | 55.63 | 28.24

to open. | | | | |

| | | | |

Pods 3 to 6 days old | 30 | 21.13 | 112 | 39.81 | 18.68

| | | | |

Pods 9 to 12 days old | 35 | 15.23 | 50 | 29.86 | 14.63

| | | | |

------------------------+--------+---------+--------+---------+---------

The effect of the water was noticeable soon after the first

application, as the leaves and flowers on this plant became turgid and

the anther sacs burst at the proper stage of their development. Very

few flowers fell after the second day. The water decidedly checked

the aborting of immature pods, as is shown by the results obtained on

the racemes which were labeled after the pods had formed. The racemes

which contained pods 3 to 6 days old when labeled matured 9.95 pods to

the raceme more than those which contained older pods at the beginning

of the experiment, but this was expected, as most of the aborting

which caused this difference had taken place before the racemes were

labeled. As very few pods aborted before they were 3 to 6 days old, the

difference of 9.95 pods to the raceme in favor of the ones labeled

when the flowers at their bases were just ready to open was largely

due to the dropping of the flowers on the older racemes before the

experiment was begun.

It will be seen that the production of mature pods on the plant not

watered was much greater on the racemes that were labeled before

the flowers opened than on the older racemes. This difference is

undoubtedly due to the precipitation which fell on the sixth and tenth

days of the experiment. It is believed that the yield of 15.23 pods

to the raceme on the ones labeled when the pods were 9 to 12 days old

is representative of the production of pods per raceme previous to

the precipitation and that the other racemes on this plant would have

yielded proportionately if conditions had remained the same.

In the early spring of 1916, _Melilotus alba_ was planted in several

large pots in the greenhouse of the Department of Agriculture at

Washington, D. C. These pots were placed outside the greenhouse in

the late spring, where they remained until the following January,

when they were taken into the greenhouse. The plants grew rapidly and

began to flower during the latter part of April, 1917. At this time

two pots were placed in a large cage made of screen having 20 meshes

to the linear inch. One pot was submerged in a tub of water, so that

the soil was saturated at all times, while the plant in the other pot

was given only sufficient water to keep it from wilting. The pods on a

few racemes were self-pollinated and the results obtained are given in

Table IX.

Table IX.--_Effect of moisture on the seed production of

Melilotus alba at Washington, D. C, in 1917._

-------------------------+------------------+---------+--------+--------

|Total number of-- | Flowers that matured

| | (per cent).

+--------+---------+---------+--------+--------

Soil treatment. | | | Pods | |

|Racemes.| Flowers.| formed. | Total. |Increase.

-------------------------+--------+---------+---------+--------+--------

| | | | |

Soil given only a limited| 12 | 227 | 65 | 28.63 | ......

quantity of water. | | | | |

Soil saturated. | 17 | 425 | 235 | 55.03 | 26.22

-------------------------+--------+---------+---------+--------+--------

The results of this experiment compare favorably with those obtained

under field conditions at Ames in 1916.

Sweet-Clover Seed · 第 9 / 10 章