FORMER STATE OF MEDICINE IN IRELAND.

Remarks on Sir Charles Morgan’s account of the Former State of Medicine

in Italy—The author’s studies in the Anatomical Theatre of Dublin

University—Dr. Burdet—Former importance of farriers and colloughs—Jug

Coyle, and her powers of soliloquy—Larry Butler, the family farrier,

described—Luminous and veritable account of the ancient colloughs—The

_faculty_ of the present day—Hoynhymms and Yahoos—Hydrophobia in

Ireland, and its method of cure.

Doctor Sir Charles Morgan has given us, at the conclusion of his

lady’s excellent work “Italy,” the state of “medicine” in that

country. Our old cookery books, in like manner, after exquisite

receipts for all kinds of dainties, to suit every appetite, generally

finished a luxurious volume with _remedies_ for the “bite of a mad

dog—for scald heads—ague—burns—St. Anthony’s fire—St. Vitus’s

dance—the tooth-ache,” &c. &c. Now, though the Doctor certainly did

not take the cooks by way of precedent, that is no reason why I should

not indulge my whim by citing both examples, and garnishing this

volume with “the state of medicine in Ireland” fifty years ago.

I do not, however, mean to depreciate the state of medicine in these

days of “new lights” and novelties, when old drugs and poisons are

_nicknamed_, and every recipe is a rebus to an old apothecary. Each son

of Galen now strikes out his own system; composes his own syllabus; and

_finishes_ his patients according to his own proper fancy. When a man

dies after a consultation (which is generally the case—the thing being

often decided by _experiment_)—there is no particular necessity for any

explanation to widows, legatees, or heirs-at-law; the death alone of any

testator being a sufficient apology to his nearest and dearest relatives

for the failure of a consultation—that is, if the patient left

sufficient property behind him.

My state of Irish medicine, therefore, relates to those “once on a time”

days, when sons lamented their fathers,[4] and wives could weep over

expiring husbands; when every root and branch of an ancient family

became as black as rooks for the death of a blood relation, though of

almost incalculable removal. In those times the medical old woman and

the surgeon-farrier—the bone-setter and the bleeder—were by no means

considered contemptible practitioners among the Christian

population—who, in common with the dumb beasts, experienced the

advantages of their miscellaneous practice.

-----

Footnote 4:

In these times it may not, perhaps, be fully credited when I tell—that

four of my father’s sons carried his body _themselves_ to the grave:

that his eldest son was in a state bordering on actual distraction at

his death; and in the enthusiastic paroxysms of affection which we all

felt for our beloved parent at that cruel separation, I do even now

firmly believe there was not one of us who would not, on the impulse

of the moment, have sprung into, and supplanted him in his grave, to

have restored him to animation. But we were all a family of nature and

of heart, and decided enemies to worldly objects.

-----

An anatomical theatre being appended to the University of Dublin,

whenever I heard of a _fresh_ subject, or remarkable corpse, being

obtained for dissection, I frequently attended the lectures, and many

were the beauteous women and fine young fellows then carved into scraps

and joints _pro bono publico_.[5] I thereby obtained a smattering of

information respecting our corporeal clockwork; and having, for

amusement, skimmed over “Cullen’s First Lines,” “Every Man his Own

Doctor,” “Bishop Berkeley on Tar Water,” and “Sawny Cunningham on the

Virtues of Fasting Spittle,” I almost fancied myself qualified for a

diploma. A Welsh aunt of mine, also, having married Doctor Burdet, who

had been surgeon of the Wasp sloop of war, and remarkable for leaving

the best stumps of any naval practitioner, he explained to me the use of

his various instruments for tapping, trepanning, raising the

shoulder-blades, &c. &c.: but when I had been a short time at my

father’s in the country, I found that the farriers and old women

performed, either on man or beast, twenty cures for one achieved by the

doctors and apothecaries. I had great amusement in conversing with these

people, and perceived some reason in their arguments.

-----

Footnote 5:

I never saw a young woman brought into the dissecting-room but my

blood ran cold, and I was immediately set a-moralising. The old song

of “Death and the Lady” is a better lecture for the fair sex than all

the sermons that ever were preached, including Mr. Fordyce’s. ’Tis a

pity that song is not _melodised_ for the use of the fashionables

during their campaigns in London.

-----

As to the farriers, I reflected, that as man is only a mechanical

animal, and a horse one of the same description, there was no reason why

a drug that was good for a pampered gelding might not also be good for

the hard-goer mounted on him. In truth, I have seen instances where, in

point both of intellect and endurance, there was but very little

distinction between the animals—save that the beverage of the one was

_water_, and that of the other was _punch_—and, in point of _quantity_,

there was no great difference between them in this matter either.

At that time there was seldom more than one regular doctor in a circuit

of twenty miles, and a farrier never came to physic a gentleman’s horse

that some boxes of pills were not deducted from his balls, for the

general use of the ladies and gentlemen of the family; and usually

succeeded vastly better than those of the apothecary.

The class of old women called colloughs were then held in the highest

estimation, as understanding the cure (that is if God pleased) of all

disorders. Their _materia medica_ did not consist of gums, resins,

minerals, and hot iron,—as the farriers’ did; but of leaves of bushes,

bark of trees, _weeds_ from _churchyards_, and mushrooms from _fairy

grounds_; rue, garlic, rosemary, birds’-nests, foxglove, &c.: in

desperate cases they sometimes found it advisable to put a _charm_ into

the bolus or stoop, and then it was sure to be “firm and good.” I never

could find out what either of their charms were. They said they should

die themselves if they disclosed them to any body. No collough ever

could be a _doctor_ whilst she had one tooth remaining in her head, as

the remedy was always reduced to a pulp or paste by her own mumbling of

its materials, and the contact of an old grinder would destroy the

purity of the charms and simples, and leave the cure, they would say, no

better than a farrier’s.

Our old collough, Jug Coyle, as she sat in a corner of the hob, by the

great long turf fire in the kitchen, exactly in the position of the

Indian squaws, munching and mumbling for use an apron-full of her

morning’s gatherings in the fields, used to talk at intervals very

_sensibly_ of her art. “Ough! then, my dear sowl, (said she one

evening,) what would the poor Irishers have done in owld times but for

their colloughs? Such brutes as you!” continued she, (looking at Butler,

the farrier of the family, who was seated fast asleep on a bench at the

opposite end of the hearth,) “’tis you, and the likes of you, a curse on

you, root and branch! that starved the colloughs by giving your poisons

to both cows and quality. Sure its the farriers’ and pothecaries’ drugs

that kills all the people-ay, and the horses and cattle too,” and she

shook her claw-like fist at the unconscious farrier.

“Jug Coyle,” said I, “why are you so angry?”

Jug:—“Sure it’s not for myself, it’s for my calling,” said she: “a

thousand years before the round towers were built (and nobody can tell

_that_ time), the colloughs were greater nor any lady in the country. We

had plenty of charms in those days, Master Jonah, till the farriers

came, bad luck to the race! Ough! may the curse of Crummell light on

yees all, breed, seed, and generation, Larry Butler! not forgetting Ned

Morrisy of Clapook, the villanous cow-doctor, that takes the good from

the colloughs likewise, and all—”

Here Jug Coyle stopped short, as the farrier opened his eyes, and she

knew well that if Larry Butler had a sup in, he would as soon beat an

old woman as any body else. She therefore resumed munching her herbs,

but was totally silenced.

Larry Butler was one of the oldest and most indispensable _attachés_ of

our family. Though nobody remembered him a _boy_, he was as handy, as

fresh, and as _rational_, perhaps more so, than half a century before.

Short, broad, and bow-legged, bone and muscle kept his body together—for

flesh was absent. His face, once extremely handsome, still retained its

youthful colouring—though broken and divided: his sharp eye began to

exhibit the dimness of age: the long white hair had deserted his high

forehead, but fell, in no scanty locks, down each side of his animated

countenance. He is before my eye at this moment—too interesting, and, at

the same time, odd a figure ever to be forgotten.

I had a great respect for old Butler: he was very passionate, but

universally licensed: he could walk any distance, and always carried in

his hand a massive firing-iron. I have thus particularly described the

old man, as being one of the most curious characters of his class I ever

met in Ireland.

Larry soon showed signs of relapsing into slumber; but Jug, fearing it

was a _fox’s sleep_ (an old trick of his), did not recommence her

philippic on the farriers, but went on in her simple praise of the

collough practice. “Sure,” said she, “God never sent any disorder into a

country that he did not likewise send something to cure it with.”

“Why, certainly, Jug,” said I, “it would be rather bad treatment if we

had no cures in the country.”

“Ough! that saying is like your dear father,” said she, “and your

grandfather before you, and your great-grandfather who was before him

agin. Moreover,” pursued Jug, “God planted our cures in the fields

because there was no pothecaries.”

“Very true, Jug,” said I.

“Well, then, Master Jonah,” resumed she, “if God or the Virgin, and I’m

sure I can’t say which of them, planted the cures, sure they must have

made people who knew how to pick them up in the fields, or what good is

their growing there?”

“There’s no gainsaying that, Jug,” gravely observed I.

“Well, then, it was to the colloughs, sure enough, God gave the

knowledge of picking the cures up—because he knew well that they were

owld and helpless, and that it would be a charity to employ them. When

once they learned the herbs, they were welcome every where; and there

was not _one_ man died in his bed (the people say) in owld times for

_twenty_ now-a-days.”

“Of that there is no doubt, Jug,” said I, “though there may be other

reasons for it.”

“Ough! God bless you agin, avourneen! any how,” said Jug. “Well, then,

they say it was Crummell and his troopers, bad luck to their sowls, the

murdering villains! that brought the first farriers (and no better luck

to _them_!) to Ireland, and the colloughs were kilt with the hunger. The

craturs, as the owld people tell, eat grass like the beasts when the

cows were all kilt by the troopers and farriers—avourneen, avourneen!”

Modern practitioners will perceive, by these two specimens of our

ancient _doctors_, that the state of medicine in Ireland was totally

different from that in Italy. Surgery being likewise a branch of the

healing art, no doubt also differed in the two countries, in a similar

degree. I shall therefore give a few _instances_ of both medico-surgical

and surgico-medical practice fifty years ago in Ireland; and if my

talented friend, Lady Morgan, will be so good as to inquire, she will

find, that though she has left medicine so entirely to her lord, she may

get an admirable _doctor_ or two to introduce into her next Irish

_imaginations_—which I hope will be soon forthcoming—certainly not

sooner than agreeable and welcome.

I must here notice a revolution; namely, that of late, since farriers

have got a “step in the peerage,” and are made commissioned officers in

the army, they think it proper to refine their pharmacopeia so as to

render it more congenial to their new rank and station, and some horses

are now not only theoretically but practically placed on more than a

level with the persons who mount them.

The practice of horse medicine is indeed so completely revolutionised,

that gas, steam, and the chemistry of Sir Humphrey Davy, are resorted to

for the morbid affections of that animal in common with those of a

nobleman. The horse, now, regularly takes his hot bath like my lord and

lady, James’ powders, refined liquorice, musk, calomel, and laudanum,

with the most “elegant extracts” and delicate infusions. As if

_Gulliver_ were a prophet, he literally described, in the reign of Queen

Anne, both the _English horse_ and the _Irish peasant_ as they exist at

the present moment. If the lodging, clothing, cleaning, food, medicine,

and attendance of the modern Hoynhymm, be contrasted with the pig-sty,

rags, filth, neglect, and hunger of the Yahoo, it must convince any

honest neutral that Swift (that greatest of Irishmen) did not overcharge

his satire. The sum lavished upon the care of one Hoynhymm for _a single

day_, with little or nothing to do, is more (exclusive of the farrier)

than is now paid to five Irish Yahoos for _twelve hours’_ hard labour,

with to feed, clothe, lodge, and nourish _themselves_, and probably five

wives and twenty or thirty children, for the same period, into the

bargain.

A few very curious cases may elucidate our ancient practice of cure—a

practice, I believe, never even heard of in any other part of Europe.

The bite of a mad dog was to the Irish peasantry of all things the most

puzzling and terrific; and I am sure I can scarcely guess what Doctor

Morgan will think of my veracity when I state the two modes by which

that horrible mania was neutralised or finally put an end to.

When the bite of a dog took place, every effort was made to kill the

beast, and if they succeeded, it was never inquired whether he actually

_was_, or (as the colloughs used to say) _pretended to be_ mad: his

liver was immediately taken out, dried by the fire till quite hard, then

reduced to powder, and given in frequent doses with a draught of holy or

blessed water, to the patient for seven days. If it happened that the

saliva did not penetrate the sufferer’s clothes, or if the dog was _not_

actually mad, it was then considered that the patient was _cured_ by

drinking the dog’s liver and holy water;—and if it so happened that the

bite set him barking, then the priest and farrier told them it was the

will of God that he should bark, and they were contented either to let

him die at his leisure, or send him to heaven a little sooner than was

absolutely necessary.

The herbs of the colloughs were sometimes successfully resorted to;

whether accidental or actual preventives or antidotes, it is not easy to

determine: but when I detail the ulterior remedy to cure the hydrophobia

in Ireland, or at least to render it _perfectly innoxious_, I am well

aware that I shall stand a good chance of being honoured by the

periodicals with the appellation of a “bouncer,” as on occasion of the

former volumes: but the ensuing case, as I can personally vouch for the

fact, I may surely give with tolerable confidence.

Personal sketches of his own times, Vol. 3 (of 3) · 第 50 / 81 题