Maxwell hesitated. He could not prevaricate with those clear

[Illustration:

CHAMBERS’S JOURNAL

OF

POPULAR

LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART

Fifth Series

ESTABLISHED BY WILLIAM AND ROBERT CHAMBERS, 1832

CONDUCTED BY R. CHAMBERS (SECUNDUS)

NO. 150.—VOL. III. SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1886. PRICE 1½_d._]

THE PORTABLE THEATRE.

A few wagon-loads of large and square wooden shutters; numerous poles

of various lengths; a quantity of seat-planks and their supports; some

scene-painted canvas wrapped around long rollers, some nailed and glued

upon framework; a collection of ropes and pulleys; various ‘stage

properties;’ two open coke-fire grates; an amount of dark and soiled

drapery and cheap carpeting, and a mass of other things—meet these on

the highway, and you may know that a portable theatre is shifting its

quarters.

Soon after the wagons reach their destination, the work of building

commences. The town chosen is no doubt a small one, with interests

which may be manufacturing, mineral, or agricultural. The theatre

had arranged for its stance before moving—some waste ground let at

a nominal rent, or a field bordering the town. Then beardless men,

dressed in stained and ragged cloth garments, start hacking up the

ground, digging narrow holes wherein to erect uprights. While some

erect the framework, others build at one end a gallery, at the other

a stage; and so bit by bit. After an adornment of the interior by

draping the walls with some material and giving a scant covering to

the best seats, and a sawdust carpet to the whole concern, the labour

of erection is about at an end, and the actor-builders are at liberty

to cleanse—and shave themselves if they have time, and throw off their

working clothes. If they perform the same night and are late, they

will have little time for rest; and in the impersonator of Hamlet,

who enters the stage at a quarter to eight to a flourish on brass and

string, you may recognise the man who, forty-five minutes before, had

been walking to his lodgings in a state of grime and weariness and with

a stubbly chin. When he appears as the Prince, he is clean shaven, all

but the heavy moustache—for that is his pride, and is never sacrificed.

The portable theatre is generally ‘run’ by the proprietor, who is often

also stage-manager and leading man or comedian. The usual method of

fixing the amount of payment to employees is by share. In this way

every individual worker is a sort of partner, and so feels an interest

in the welfare of the business; and if the receipts are large, he,

and she, participate in the benefit. This method is favourable to the

manager and proprietor too, even when business is not brisk, though

he is never heard to admit as much. The mode of procedure is very

simple, and may be worthy the attention of those who admire simplicity

and promptitude in business. The sharing takes place nightly after

performance, when the audience have dispersed and the curtain has been

drawn up, and all the company are dressed for home and assembled on

the stage. The proprietor sits at a table in the centre, the receipts

in cash and a slip of paper before him. ‘The “house” is three pounds

and fourpence,’ the manager proceeds to explain; ‘and from that is to

be taken two shillings for ground-rent; that leaves two-eighteen-four.

Now, twenty-five shares into that is two shillings and fourpence a

share. It’s very bad, especially for an opening night; but the show

went well, so we may hope business’ll pick up, now they know what

we are like. I hope it will, for all our sakes.’ And then does the

gentleman proceed to give to each member his one share, which on this

night amounts to two shillings and fourpence; but to the low comedian

is given an extra half-share, according to agreement, for his services

are very valuable to the firm, and he is expected to sing humorous

songs during the interval between drama and farce.

Now, all this looks very fair on the face of it; but much may be

learned by an analysis of the arrangement. The proprietor has given

twelve and a half shares among twelve people, in which are included the

small orchestra; the remainder he has put in his pocket. For his own

services as leading man and stage-manager, and for his wife, who plays

the feminine leading parts—when they are good—he takes up four shares

each night; for supplying the wardrobe!—which is scanty and worn—he

takes another share; he has another to recoup him for that night’s

outlay in stage properties; a half-share to pay for the coke the fires

have burned; and lastly, he takes six shares as rent of the theatre,

which is his property. So, of the twenty-five shares into which the

receipts are nightly divided, the proprietor receives altogether twelve

and a half. Much of this he would tell you is but the return of money

previously laid out, and the melancholy sigh with which he accompanies

the ceremony of division is meant to indicate the fact that he is

losing money rapidly.

His wife, when not in the cast, or his offspring, or a decrepit father,

are generally assigned to the post of money-taker at the theatre door.

The company are supposed to have a check against them by appointing as

their representatives those who collect the tickets. The person who

receives the cash from the public as they enter is familiarly known to

the fraternity by the name of ‘first robber.’

Now, many who know the business have been heard to declare that the

manager seldom loses—if ever—and generally gains, however slack

business may be, and even while his fellow-actors are pinched for

necessities. If it is asked, ‘Why do the workers agree to such an

arrangement?’ it may be replied: ‘The proprietor and manager is master

in his own establishment; and those who won’t conform to the rules of

the theatre may go and make way for those who will.’

Altogether, portable actors, or, as many of the labouring classes

prefer to call them, showfolk, make but a precarious living, and they

have often many troubles, for which they receive little sympathy.

At times they are heard speaking of how some years ago, during the

fair at a certain town, they performed five times during the day,

and individually amassed three pounds seven shillings for the day’s

work. But that was a rare occurrence, and they dwell with pleasure

upon the memory of it. The usual share in ordinary times rises to five

shillings nightly during good business, and perhaps as much as seven

or eight on the Saturday, and very often it drops to the amount of

but a few coppers. There is all the excitement of chance in this mode

of remuneration, and that may offer an inducement to some speculative

minds. If trade is bad, or the people are too poor or anti-theatrical,

the strolling Thespian may find that his reward after work is something

less than a shilling, and upon that he may have to feed and lodge

himself until the next night brings a further supply.

Many who dwell in towns think that the portable theatre is now little

more than a remnant of a bygone age, that the drama has cast off this

itineracy; and such thinkers would doubtless be surprised if they

were shown a list of the playhouses that move about the country. They

are certainly very numerous. These buildings seldom look well in the

morning light; there is a dissipated look about them, as though they

kept bad hours. This more particularly applies to the interior, to

whose good appearance the glare of gas is very essential. When the

actors assemble for rehearsal, which is generally at eleven o’clock,

the drapery looks dull and tawdry, the woodwork seems rough, the

sawdust over the earth-floor is dirty, and the scenes appear daubs. If

there be a little breeze astir, the canvas roofing overhead will flap

with a sound like that of the sails of a ship at sea. The curtain and

scene-cloths are rolled up, that the dust may not settle upon them.

When the players have gathered together, rehearsal commences. They

seem a motley group. There is the proprietor and manager, a portly

man, who is troubled with occasional rheumatism—which he calls gout;

he wears a heavy moustache and a heavy gold albert, and has much

power of voice—which at times is decidedly throaty. There is the low

comedian, who is small of stature, with an expansive face deeply lined;

his legs are misshapen, and he walks with the gait of one who suffers

the affliction of many corns and bunions. Naturally, his countenance

has the most serious aspect of any one in the company; but usage has

trained it otherwise; he would be a melancholy man were it not that he

gained his living by provoking mirth, and has a reputation to keep up.

In his youth, his soul aspired to tragedy, but his legs were against

it. Within his quaint figure he holds more sentiment than many of his

companions of more symmetrical mould, and he professes to be a diligent

and critical reader. He values ‘low comedy’ now, because it has many

advantages; it gains an extra half-share, makes him popular with the

audience, and secures him the best benefit in each town.

The middle-aged man with the stiff carriage, and with the hair grown

long and well oiled and curved, so that at the bottom it lies like a

roll upon the neck, is the ‘heavy man,’ who claims the chief-villain

parts; he glories in his deep tones and in his dark scowl. It seems

he does not much admire the smooth-faced scoundrels of the drama; you

cannot mistake the villainy _he_ portrays; directly he enters the

stage, you say, ‘That is the villain of the piece.’ And he is not

without a speciality in his particular line of business; to use his own

words—‘He likes his scoundrel’s “game;” no chicken-hearted repentance

at the end of the last act.’ His favourite final exit speech is thus:

‘Ah! soh, you have counterplotted and balked me. But I-a haave played

a bold and desper-rat game, and now I leave you with contempt-a! My

curses light-a ’pon ye!’ If, however, he is killed when villainy has

done its allotted work, he makes the most of his death, and invariably

dies with a terrific backward fall. He has been heard to complain that

in his stage career he receives small encouragement; ‘for,’ argues he,

‘after my heavy night’s work, anybody may come on with a stuffed stick

and knock me down, and they’ll get all the applause.’

One of the company is a young man whose face has already lost its

pristine freshness; he wears his hat with an inclination to the right,

and looks to be a knowing, wayward, idle, and thriftless wanderer. A

great amount of cheap beer enters into his idea of life. He drinks this

liquor at any hour; and when counting his cash, calculates it not by

pence, but by the half-pints it represents. He is a weed who benefits

nobody, not even himself. Enough has been said about him.

The man who throughout his life has never ceased to do his best,

honestly and cheerfully, and has failed through no fault of his own,

must be worthy of some respect. This has been the way of the old

gentleman—he may be called that—whose age is more than any other of

the company. In his work he is painstaking, even amid the inartistic

surroundings of a portable theatre. He now possesses an extensive stage

wardrobe, gathered for his own private use; it is the collection of

years, and he is proud of it. You won’t hear him speak so often of

his own future now, but he is always chattering about what he thinks

his daughter will do. She is a darling girl, he says, and will be the

blessing of his old age.

His daughter matches well with the morning sunshine. A fresh,

rosy-faced girl, with shining hair and laughing eyes, in great contrast

to these yellow women and blue-chinned men. She always shows neatness

and good taste. Her father has often told her that they are merely

‘birds of passage’ in this cheap playhouse, and she is anxiously

anticipating their migration. If that indulgent old dad of hers isn’t

careful, she’ll become a vain young woman.

As this girl is now, so was at one time that blear-eyed, bedraggled

woman, who seems to prefer sitting to standing and idling to working.

She is untidy and careless, and walks out with her boots unbrushed.

Her rising this morning is yet quite a recent affair; traces of sleep

still cling to her eyes. Not many years ago, she was as fair and modest

as the old man’s daughter is now, and not a soul anticipated such a

change. Who can answer that the other may not alter likewise?

The man who is hammering at some repair to the building is the

degenerated female’s husband, and candour must confess that he looks

it. He has many of his wife’s characteristics; the same dissipated

face, impolite manner at times, and general attitude of discontent. But

these parallel ways of theirs are not productive of concord; quite the

contrary, for, as one of their acquaintance tersely observes, ‘They

quarrel like old boots,’ a simile which must be more fantastic than

correct.

Among the company is an old woman who only needs the sugar-loaf-shaped

hat to resemble the familiar pictures of a witch. She is indigenous

to the portable theatre, was cradled in one, and knows little of any

life beyond it. Her daughter is that scraggy, uncanny-looking young

female, whose dominant passion at present is jealousy of the old man’s

daughter, whom she never ceases to malign.

The rehearsal here is not generally a long ceremony. A partial or

complete repetition of the words, and a comparing of notes respecting

the various entrances, exits, and general business of the play, and

that is all. Then the healthy-minded people do their marketing, and go

off for a short walk. The others continue to ‘hang about.’

The audience that comes here likes its dramatic food strong—no parlour

comedies and talky dramas, but plenty of incident, of action, passions,

stirring speeches, combats, and a little coloured fire burned off the

wings. The probability of the sequence of events as here dramatically

represented, or the possibility of their occurrence at all, are not

matters which trouble the mind of either the actor or his audience.

In the matter of denouements the author’s published idea is quite

regularly departed from in the portable theatre, and of greatest

playwrights’ masterpieces it is frequently said: ‘Oh, we can bring the

curtain down better than that.’ So, directly vice is unmasked with

a taste of punishment, the virtuous gather together—perhaps without

explanation of why they were so near—and the hero spouts a short speech

in a victorious spirit, and thus—finale.

At one travelling theatre where the manager followed the usual custom

of announcing during each evening the succeeding night’s programme, the

drama in question had been billed. In the managerial speech occurred

the following words: ‘I have very great pleasure in announcing for next

Thursday night the production, for the first time during our visit, of

the favourite play, entitled _Maria Martin, or the Murder at the Red

Barn_. I have further pleasure in stating that the version we play has

_never_ been performed in this town; and was written expressly for this

company by a relative of the Martin family, and has been secured by me

at great expense.’

This information was received with much satisfaction and applause; that

it had had the desired effect was proved conclusively by a view of the

Thursday night’s house. And the gentleman faithfully kept his promise,

for he played a version that had certainly never been performed in that

town; he introduced into the drama as usually given, a part of a gypsy

family of vengeful proclivities, and so got two sets of murders, and

as both were constantly repeated in visions, it may be supposed the

audience had a fair dose of dramatic crime for its money.

But there is many a good performance to be seen in a portable theatre;

and extremely good, when the surroundings are considered. The writer

remembers a very creditable performance of the play of _Hamlet_—given

one dreadfully wild night in a portable that was not the best of

its kind. The rain had penetrated the roof in many places before

the performance began, and the wind had been all day threatening to

blow off the tilt. With the combined damp and cold, it was a very

undesirable task to don long hose and thin velvet shirts, and to wear

them for three hours in such a draughty and rain-sodden place. But this

discomfort was necessary there, as a slight mitigation of a state of

poverty. Perhaps there was a want of repose in the acting that night,

for it was advisable to dodge those places where the water found the

roof weakest, and so descended as from a spout. The Ghost, who had a

cold, coughed during his scenes in a most unspectral manner. In the

‘play-scene’ there was a crash, and it was feared the tilt was gone,

and one of the courtiers ran out to see what had given way. Two of the

rope-fastenings were loose and flying about wildly. They were secured

during the performance, but not without some trouble, each male actor

throwing a coat over his shoulders, and giving a hand when the scene in

progress did not require him. But as these were fastened, others broke,

and it was altogether a night of trouble. Before the last act was

reached, there was little to be gained by dodging; the rain penetrated

steadily all over, and would fall on heads and run down backs and

disturb projecting noses, wherever their owners stood. Hamlet died on

a damp couch that night, for the stage carpet was soaked and flooded,

but he would be artistic and die lying full length. I can testify that

the Horatio, who had to kneel and support the Prince’s head, wished

he would die quicker. But ‘The rest is silence,’ came at last; and

Hamlet jumped up again, and then looked radiantly happy; for just as

the curtain was descending, one of the audience stood and threw to the

actor a rose. It was a pretty compliment, and the recipient deserved it.

When the audience had dispersed, the actors received their

reward—fifteenpence each. They deserved it. But their labour was not

yet ended for the day. The rain had abated, but the wind lashed with

greater force and blew with louder voice. ‘Nothing short of a miracle

will save that roof to-night,’ said somebody. So its safety had to be

guarded; that is, the company were to attend in turns and keep watch,

two or three at a time. One of the coke-fires in the auditorium was

replenished, and round it the men sat, talking of absent acquaintances,

recounting the peculiarities of some, and giving anecdotes; while

above their heads the swaying of the canvas sounded loud, and the wind

whirled in fury round the creaking shutters. And thus, as they drowsily

sit, wishing for rest, we will leave them.

BY ORDER OF THE LEAGUE.

CHAPTER XIII.

For a time, Enid stood looking at the sufferer sadly, and wondering

where the friends of the poor girl might be. Gradually, as the scene

came back to her, she remembered the words of Lucrece, and turned to

her. ‘Lucrece, did I hear you say you knew this poor woman?’

‘Indeed, yes, miss. Three years ago, in Paris, Linda and I were great

friends—what you English call “chums.” She was an actress at the

“Varieties”—a clever player; but she could not rise. Jealousy and a bad

husband prevented that. Poor Linda, she has all the talent!’

‘Strange that you should know her; but still fortunate. Perhaps,

through you, we may be able to discover where her friends are.’

‘Poor child! she has no friends.—But hush! See! she has opened her

eyes.’

The sufferer was looking wildly around. She tried to rise, but the pain

and weakness were too great, and she sank back with a deep fluttering

sigh. As she collected her senses—‘Where am I?’ she asked faintly. ‘How

did I come here?’

‘Do not distress yourself,’ Enid said softly. ‘You are quite safe. You

had an accident, and they brought you here.’

For a moment the girl closed her eyes. ‘I remember now. I was knocked

down by a cab. But I am better now. Let me get up. Where is my boy?’

she continued—‘what has become of my boy?’

‘Do not trouble yourself about your child,’ Enid said soothingly,

marvelling that one apparently so young should be a mother. ‘He shall

be well cared for. Tell us where he is, and he shall be brought to

you.’

‘You are so good—so good and beautiful! You will find a card in my

jacket-pocket where to send for him. Tell me, bright angel of goodness,

what is the name they know you by?’

‘My name is Enid Charteris,’ she replied, smiling a little at the

theatrical touch, earnest though it was.—‘I must not let you talk any

longer. The doctor was very strict about that.’

At the mention of the name, the sick woman became strangely agitated,

so much so that Enid was alarmed. ‘Am I in Grosvenor Square? Are you

the daughter of Sir Geoffrey Charteris?’

‘Yes, yes. But you really must be quiet now.’

But instead of complying with this request, the stranger burst into a

fit of hysterical crying, weeping and sobbing as if her heart would

break. ‘Miserable woman that I am!’ she cried, ‘what have I done? Oh,

what have I done? O that I could have known before!’

Enid looked at Lucrece in alarm. The outbreak was so sudden, so

unexpected, that for a moment they were too startled to speak.

‘She is unhinged by the shock,’ Enid whispered. ‘Perhaps if you were to

speak to her, it would have a good effect.’

‘Yes, madam. But if I may be allowed to make a suggestion—I should say

it was better if you left the room for a time. She sees some likeness

to you, or fancies she does, to some one. She knows me; and if you will

leave for a short time, I will try and soothe her.’

‘I think you are right, Lucrece. I will come in again presently, when

she has become quieter.’

Directly Enid quitted the apartment, Lucrece’s whole manner changed

from the subdued domestic to the eager sympathetic friend. She bent

over the bed and looked down in the suffering woman’s eyes. ‘Linda! do

you not know me? It is I, Lucrece!’

‘You—and here? What is the meaning of this, and in the dress of a

servant? Tell me,’ she continued eagerly. ‘You are not one of his

friends in his pay, to help his vile schemes?’

‘I do not know who _he_ is. I am here for a good purpose—to protect my

mistress from a great harm.’

‘Ah, then, you are no friend of Le Gautier’s.—Do you ever see him? Does

he come here often? Do you know what he is after?’

Lucrece started. ‘What do you know of Le Gautier?’

‘What do I know of him? Everything that is bad, and bitter, and

fiendish! But he will not succeed, if I have to sacrifice my life to

aid the beautiful lady who has been so kind to me.’

‘You are not the only one who would,’ Lucrece quietly answered. ‘Tell

me what you know.’

‘I did not know then how good and noble she is.—My head is queer and

strange, Lucrece; I cannot tell you now. To-morrow, perhaps, if I am

better, I will tell you everything. I am glad now that they brought me

here.’

Meanwhile, Maxwell was pacing about the drawing-room, having entirely

forgotten the unfortunate woman in his own perplexity. He had been

there perhaps half an hour, when Enid entered. She was not too occupied

to notice the moody, thoughtful frown upon his face.

‘What a sad thing for her, poor woman!’ she said.—‘How did it happen,

Fred?’

‘Poor woman?’ Maxwell asked vaguely. ‘How did what happen?’

‘Why, Fred, what is the matter with you?’ Enid exclaimed with vague

alarm. ‘How strange you look! Surely you have not forgotten the poor

creature you brought here not more than half an hour ago?’

Maxwell collected himself by a violent effort. ‘I had actually

forgotten. I was thinking of something else.—Enid, dear, I am going

away!’

‘Going away! Any one would think, from the expression of your face and

the tone of your voice, you were never going to return. Where are you

going?’

There was a very considerable chance of his not returning, he felt, and

he smiled at the grim idea. ‘I am not going far—at least not very far,

in this age of express trains and telegraphs. I wish I could take you

with me, darling; for I am going to a place you have often longed to

see—I am going to Rome.’

‘To Rome? Is it not very sudden? You never told me before.’

‘Well, it is rather sudden. I have not known it long. You see, I could

not tell you a thing I was ignorant of myself.’

‘I wish you were not going,’ Enid said reflectively. ‘I have a feeling

that some evil will come of this. And yet I suppose you must go. Is it

business of your own, Fred?’

Maxwell hesitated. He could not prevaricate with those clear truthful

eyes looking up so earnestly to his own. The soul of honour himself,

he could not forgive the want of it in others; but he temporised now.

‘Well, not exactly my own,’ he stammered, trying to make the best of a

bad case, ‘or I would not go. It is a secret, which I cannot tell even

you; but I shall not be long away.’

‘A secret which you cannot tell even me,’ Enid repeated mechanically.

‘Then it must be something you are very much ashamed of.’

‘Indeed, it is not,’ Maxwell began eagerly, hesitated, and stopped.

After all, she was right. It was a secret, a terrible, shameful secret,

against which all the manliness in him revolted. For a time he was

silent, hanging down his head for very shame, as the whole force of

his position came upon him. For the first time, he realised where his

rashness had led him, and what he was about to lose.

Enid looked at him in amazement, strangely mixed with a terrible and

nameless fear. ‘Fred!’ she cried at length, white and trembling, ‘you

are going away upon the mission of that awful League! You cannot deny

it.—O Fred! Fred!’

He tried to soothe her as she lay sobbing in his arms, but to no avail.

The most fervent promises and the most endearing words she heeded not,

crying that he was going from her never to return; and her fears were

strengthened when he mournfully but firmly declined to speak of his

mission. Presently, when she grew a little calmer, she raised her wet

cheeks to him and kissed him. She was pale now, but confident, and

striving with all the artifices in her power to persuade him from his

undertaking; but tears and prayers, threats even, could not avail.

He shook his head sadly. ‘I would that I could stay with you, Enid,’

he said at length, holding her close in his arms; ‘but this much I can

tell you—that I dare not disobey. It is as much as my life is worth.’

‘And as much as your life is worth to go,’ echoed the sobbing girl.

‘What is life to me without you? And now this thing has come between

us, parting us perhaps for ever!’

‘I hope not,’ Maxwell smiled cheerfully. ‘I trust not, darling. My time

away is very short; and doubtless I shall not be called upon again for

a time—perhaps never.’

Enid dried her eyes bravely and tried to smile. ‘Good-bye, Fred,’ she

said brokenly; ‘and heaven grant that my fears are groundless! If

anything happened to you, I believe I should die.’

‘I shall come back, darling.—And now, good-bye, and God bless you.’

After he was gone, Enid threw herself down upon the lounge and wept.

* * * * *

Le Gautier’s star was in the ascendant. His only dangerous rival would

soon be hundreds of miles away on a hazardous mission, out of which, in

all human probability, he could not come unscathed, even if he escaped

with life; a prospective father-in-law wholly in his power; and a bride

_in posse_, upon whose fears he could work by describing graphically

her father’s danger, with the moral, that it would be her duty to her

parent to wed his preserver, Le Gautier. This, in fine, was the pretty

scheme the wily adventurer had sketched out in his busy brain, a scheme

which at present looked like being brought to a successful issue.

Another source of congratulation to this inestimable young man was the

progress he was making with the fair stranger, known to him as Marie St

Jean. By the time a fortnight had passed, he had been in Ventnor Street

more than once, and quite long enough to feel a passion stronger than

he had ever experienced before. It was absolutely dangerous to him, he

knew, to be with her so often; but like the moth and the candle, the

attraction was so great that he found it impossible to keep away—not

that he lost his head for a moment, though he well knew that Marie St

Jean could turn him round her finger; but he had formed his plans even

here. The first step was to betray the League—the scheme was not quite

ripe yet, and the news of Maxwell uncertain—and then take Marie St Jean

for a tour upon the continent. There would be plenty of time to return

and marry Enid afterwards without any unnecessary bother; for he had

already made up his mind that Miss St Jean was too proud to show her

wrongs to the world.

On the Monday afternoon following Maxwell’s departure, Le Gautier

turned his steps in the direction of Grosvenor Square, feeling on good

terms with himself and all mankind. His schemes were prospering hugely.

It was clearly useless, he determined, now to hesitate any longer;

the blow must be struck, and the sooner the better for all parties

concerned. With this intention upmost in his mind, he trippingly

ascended the steps of Sir Geoffrey’s house and knocked.

He found the baronet in the library, engaged as usual over some volume

of deep spiritualistic research; the thing had become a passion with

him now, and every spare moment was spent in this morbid amusement. He

was getting thin and haggard over it, and Le Gautier thought he looked

very old and careworn as he watched him now.

‘You have come just in time,’ he cried, placing a paper-knife in the

book and turning eagerly to Le Gautier. ‘I have a passage here that I

am unable to understand. Listen to this.’

‘I have something more important to speak of,’ Le Gautier interrupted.

‘I have something more pressing on hand than that attractive subject.

Sir Geoffrey, next week I am summoned to Warsaw.’

The baronet began to feel anxious; he knew perfectly well what was

coming, and, like all weak men, he dreaded anything like evil. The part

that he had to play was a despicable one, and he feared his daughter’s

angry scorn. Like a recalcitrant debtor, he began to cry for time, the

time that never comes. ‘So you informed me last week,’ he replied,

twisting a paper-knife in his hands uneasily. ‘I hope you will have a

pleasant journey. How long do you expect to be detained there?’

‘I cannot tell; it depends upon the amount of business to be done. I

may be away six weeks; but, at the very least, I do not see how I can

get back to England under the month.’

Sir Geoffrey’s face lighted, in spite of his air of regret. Le Gautier

noticed this; nothing escaped the ken of those keen black eyes.

‘And when you return, we will complete our little arrangements,’ Sir

Geoffrey exclaimed cheerfully. ‘No hurry, you know, no haste in such

matters as these; and, referring to our previous conversation, we

cannot be too careful in treading such uncertain ground. Enid’——

‘Precisely,’ Le Gautier interrupted. ‘With all due deference to your

opinion, there is need of action, which is a very different matter from

that raw haste which your poet tells us is half-sister to delay. I must

have something definite settled before I leave England.’

‘’Pon my honour, you know, you young men are very hasty,’ the baronet

fidgeted; ‘there is no controlling you. In my time, things were quite

different; men professed a certain deference to women, and did not take

so much for granted as you do now’——

‘Sir Geoffrey,’ Le Gautier interrupted again, ‘things change; men

alter; but perfect love is the same for all time. I love your daughter,

and would make her my wife.’

In spite of the baronet’s feeble-mindedness, there was always something

in the Frenchman’s higher flights which jarred upon his nerves, a sense

of insincerity, a certain hollow, grotesque mockery, which pained him.

The last word struck upon him like some chords played out of tune.

Still the spell was upon him; he had nought to do but obey.

‘We perfectly understand that,’ he replied, ‘and therefore need say no

more about it. You have my promise; indeed, how can it be otherwise

with the memory of that awful manifestation before me? And the word of

a Charteris is always sufficient. But I do think, Le Gautier, that you

are pushing this thing too far.’

‘Let the depth of my love excuse my impetuosity;’ and again the words

struck harshly on the listener’s ears. ‘Surely the excuse is a good

one. I am leaving England shortly; and before I go, I must—nay, I will

have an answer to the question which affects my happiness so deeply. It

is only fair, only just that I should know my fate.’

Sir Geoffrey speculated feebly what he was to do with a man like this.

‘But have a little patience; let me prepare her for your proposal.’

‘Which you will promise to do, and put off day after day, as a man does

who has an unpleasant task to perform. No, Sir Geoffrey; I do not wish

to conduct my wooing second-hand. There is no time like the present; my

motto is “Now.” I do not ask you to help me; but before I leave this

house, it is my intention to speak to your daughter.’

In sheer desperation, not unmixed with a little irritation, Sir

Geoffrey rang the bell, and desired the servant to conduct Le Gautier

up-stairs. The thing must come sooner or later, he knew; and so long

as he was not asked personally to interfere, he did not so much mind,

though he was not unconscious of sundry twinges of conscience as his

arbitrary visitor disappeared.

RACING ROGUERIES.

To a man not infected with the disease, Turf-mania must appear the

blindest of all infatuations. The gambler who trusts to the fall of

the cards, arguing that in the natural fitness of things he is certain

to be a winner some day, and spends all his time in calculating the

doctrine of chances, is a rational person to the gull who, knowing what

a mass of roguery leavens the Turf, will yet stake money, honour, and

life upon its eventualities. Yet this is done every day, not only by

greenhorns, but by men who are quite alive to the mysterious workings

of the betting ring, who are fully aware that the ability of the horse

or the jockey is the last factor to be taken into consideration; who

can amuse you for hours with stories of the swindles practised by

owners, trainers, jockeys, ‘rings,’ and who yet go on putting their

money on the horse ‘that must win’—and never wins—in utter defiance of

their foregathered knowledge. The racing ‘prophet’ who is behind the

scenes, who makes ‘the turf’ the business of his life, not only fools

the readers of the newspaper to which he sells his vaticinations, but

himself as well, and often returns from a race as penniless as the

silly ones who pin their faith upon his oracular utterances. Even the

bookmaker has his ‘fancies,’ upon which he stakes, and loses, the money

that fools have put into his purse, with a blind confidence that is

almost incredible.

A certain horse has acquitted himself well in his trial gallops; there

is not one in the race can beat him; and _if_ he were allowed to do his

best, would undoubtedly be the winner. But, as Touchstone says, ‘There

is much virtue in an if.’ In the first place, the owner may not intend

him to win, and may have actually made arrangements for laying against

his own horse. Or if the owner be ‘straight,’ the jockey may have been

bribed to check the horse’s speed as he nears the winning-post by some

one whose interest it is that the horse shall not win. All these may

work together, or each may have different interests in the event. And

even should the animal be meant in all honesty to win, a stable lad

for a five-pound note may secretly physic the horse, and good-bye the

chances of the favourite on the morrow. Or some lurking ruffian in the

pay of another owner or bookmaker may contrive to gain admission into

the stable unknown to the animal’s guardians, and ‘nobble’ for himself.

But even after every form of knavery has been set aside, there are

contingencies that still render the risks of backing horses enormous.

The jockey may spend the night before the race in dissipation, and

mount with swimming head and nerveless hands; or in his cups he may

betray some secret of the stable that will give the advantage to a

rival; or the horse himself may become sick, or be out of form, or

stumble, or be thrown out by a cur running across the course, or other

accidents easy of occurrence; and yet, knowing all this, men will madly

risk large sums upon the supposition that no such _contretemps_ will

happen.

A few anecdotes, however, of undeniable authenticity will better

illustrate the tricks of the Turf than would pages of reflections and

generalisations.

About half a century ago, at Newmarket, several horses who stood high

in the betting, at different times suddenly went off sick just before

the race for which they were entered; some died, others recovered,

but all were disabled for the time being, and favourites that a few

hours previously outstripped every rival, would come straggling yards

behind the field. Every one knew they had been ‘nobbled;’ but for a

long time the perpetrator remained undiscovered; at last, however, a

notorious scoundrel, one Dan Dawson, was caught red-handed poisoning

the troughs. During the trial, it came out that he had made a regular

trade of these nefarious practices, and it was more than suspected

that not a few of the biggest men on the Turf were his employers. But

although he was condemned to death, whether from the hope that some

among his influential patrons would intercede for a reprieve, or from

that hatred which certain men of his class have against ‘peaching,’ he

never betrayed them, and remained silent to the end. The most minute

precautions are taken to guard the racehorse from such dangers, yet the

cunning or daring of his enemies frequently proves more than a match

for the care of his owners.

In 1842, Lanercost was regarded as the certain victor for the Ascot

Cup. While he was being conveyed to the course in a van, the grooms

in charge stopped at an inn between Leatherhead and Sunninghill to

refresh, leaving one to keep watch. Just after they had gone into

the house, two sailors came out of it. ‘Hillo,’ cried one, ‘here’s

Lanercost; let’s have a peep at him;’ and he sprang up on the side of

the van, while his companion at the same time diverted the attention of

the man on guard. A moment afterwards, the first jumped down again,

and then the two disappeared into a copse: it was all done so quickly

that the groom had no time to interpose; and before he could summon

his mates, the men were out of sight. When the race came on, instead

of achieving the anticipated victory, poor Lanercost came in last. In

the course of the ensuing month, he entirely changed colour, and was

never fit to run again. There is no doubt that the pretended sailor had

contrived to administer some powerful drug to the animal during the few

seconds he hung over his box.

Somewhere about the same time, a horse named Marcus was the favourite

for the St Leger. The day before the race, while he and some other

horses were standing at the _Doncaster Arms_, an ill-looking fellow

entered the kitchen of that tavern and seated himself beside a boiler

from which the stable lads were every now and then drawing water for

their charges. There was no one in the kitchen save a maid-servant,

whom the stranger sent out to bring him a pot of beer. When she

returned, the girl was going to fill her tea-kettle from the boiler,

but the fellow stopped her by saying: ‘I wouldn’t take my tea-water

from there if I was you, it looks so yellow and greasy.’

‘All right; I’ll get it outside,’ she answered. When she came back the

second time, the man had gone.

The next morning two horses were found dead in their stalls; while

Marcus, who was just able to run, came in last, and also died during

the day. Upon the bodies being opened, arsenic was found in their

stomachs. The girl then remembered the incident of the loafer, who had

no doubt poisoned the water in the copper; and had she been as stubborn

as most of her kind, several human victims would have been added to

the equine list. By the defeat of Marcus, the owner of a horse named

Chorister won seven thousand pounds.

Sometimes the defeat of the favourite is brought about by less bold but

more subtle means; and occasionally the tables are turned in a very

unexpected manner, as in the following instance. For the Doncaster

of 1824, Jerry—a horse belonging to a well-known sporting man named

Gascoigne—was the favourite. A little before the event came off,

however, George Payne, a noted Turfite, got ‘the tip’ from John Gully,

the ex-prizefighter, that Jerry would not win; and the day before

the race, these two worthies, doubtless well knowing _why_, laid six

thousand against him. Gascoigne could not understand how it was that

the more he backed his horse, which was in magnificent condition,

the less it advanced in favour. He felt sure there was a screw loose

somewhere, but he could not tell in what direction to look for it.

Two nights before the race, as he was taking a walk in the outskirts

of Doncaster, he paused at a turnpike gate, and just at that moment

a postchaise stopped to pay toll. By the light of the lamp which the

toll-keeper held in his hand, Gascoigne observed the jockey who was to

ride Jerry next day seated within, almost helplessly drunk, between

two of the most notorious blacklegs of the time. In a moment he saw it

all. Hurrying away, lest he should be recognised, he went back to his

hotel, and set about concocting measures to counteract the plot that

he perceived had been formed against him. Without making known his

discovery to any one, he secured the services of another jockey, bound

the man down to silence; and at the last moment, just as the traitor

was going to mount, his substitute slipped into the saddle, and won the

race, to the discomfiture and well-merited loss of the conspirators,

who had betted all they possessed upon the event.

Men called ‘Touts’ are employed by bookmakers and others to watch

racehorses at exercise and report upon their condition; these spies are

abhorred by trainers and owners, and have to pursue their espionage

under many difficulties, sometimes lying in a dry or a damp ditch,

or a hole covered over with brambles, or on the roof of a stable, to

be ready to witness the morning gallop. When detected, they do not

often escape under a horsewhipping or a ducking. On one bitterly cold

night, a fellow had crawled upon the roof of a stall to listen if the

favourite had a cough. Aware of his presence, though pretending to

be ignorant of it, the trainer ordered the stable boys to throw up

pails of water upon the spot where he was ensconced until the very

clothes froze upon the poor wretch’s back; but he had the consolation

of hearing the horse stabled beneath cough several times, and next

morning the odds were heavy against the favourite. Unfortunately for

the rogues, however, the favourite on the previous night had been moved

into another stable, and a horse with a cough had been substituted, to

deceive the tout, with the result that those who ventured their money

on his information, lost.

A much cleverer ruse was the following. An owner named Wilson was about

to try a two-year-old colt. ‘We shall be watched, and his white right

fore-leg will be sure to be noticed,’ remarked the trainer.—‘Leave that

to me,’ said Mr Wilson. Next morning, he was at the stable at daybreak,

and with some black paint soon changed the colour of the leg; while

a brush dipped in white transferred the distinguishing mark to a far

inferior horse, which showed but poorly beside the other. The tout on

the watch naturally took one for the other, and reported accordingly.

The next day, a certain nobleman gave fifteen hundred for the falsified

animal, which was worth about four.

We have purposely omitted the more celebrated Turf swindles, such as

the ‘Running Rein’ fraud, and others that made a sensation in their

day, confining ourselves to the less known affairs, which were not

found out until reparation to the victims was impossible, our principal

desire being to make clear to ‘the outsiders’ the enormous odds against

which they stake their money.

Those who are not behind the scenes may suppose that the bookmakers

(pencillers) and the ‘knowing ones’ generally, enjoy a perfect immunity

from the perils and dangers, pitfalls and temptations, of horseracing;

but that is not the case. Not unfrequently they walk blindly into

the trap they set for others; the biter is frequently bitten; and

many an ingenious fraud has been put upon the ‘pencillers’ by outside

betting-men, as the two following stories will show. For obvious

reasons, all data are suppressed, but the truth of the anecdotes can be

vouched for.

One day a City man, who was given to betting, and whom we shall call

A, received a visit from a friend addicted to the same weakness, who

shall be designated B. Locking the room door and sinking his voice to

a whisper, B announced that he had made a wonderful discovery by which

betting could be reduced to a system of all prizes and no blanks, and

consequently a fortune very quickly realised. ‘Now is your chance,’

he said, ‘if you like to join me. I shall give no explanation of the

method; come and see for yourself.’

An appointment was made for the next morning, the date of the X races,

at the Z (betting) Club.

‘Have you anything on this race?’ was the first inquiry made by B as A

came into the room.

The answer was in the negative.

‘Now, listen to me,’ said B, drawing him into a corner, for the place,

as usual at such times, was crowded with betting-men; ‘the final list

for the twelve o’clock race will be telegraphed here in a few minutes.’

(The Z, it need scarcely be said, had its private tape.) ‘Lay all the

money you like, at any odds, upon the horse I shall select, and I will

guarantee that it shall be the winner. But mind, you must not lose a

second after I have given you the hint. Go to the nearest bookmaker in

the room and make your bet on the instant.’

A minute or two afterwards, the electric bell gave the signal, and

there was a general rush to the machine. B was one of the first to

scan the list: there were five runners. He passed his finger down the

names until he paused almost imperceptibly upon Y, and looked at his

companion, who, although it was the very last horse he would have

thought of backing, boldly called out: ‘I’ll take the odds against Y.’

Y being a rank outsider, a bookmaker laid the odds on the instant. One

minute afterwards came the announcement that Y was the winner.

After they left the club together, B unfolded the mystery. ‘When the

list of runners was telegraphed,’ he said, ‘the race was already won.’

‘But how could that be?’ asked A. ‘The race was run at twelve, and the

time on the telegram was three minutes to twelve.’

‘The time was falsified,’ was the reply. ‘The message was not wired

until past the hour, nor until the winner was declared.’

‘And how could you fix upon the right one?’ demanded A.

‘There was the minutest dash on the tape against the name of the

winner, only noticeable by one in the secret. You see, the clerks are

in the pay of an Association. There are three or four other clubs

beside this where we get the telegrams in the same manner, so that we

vary our times. Here, for instance, we put upon the twelve o’clock

race; at another, upon the one; at a third, upon the two, and so on.’

We may add that the fraud was ultimately discovered, and the clerks who

worked it severely punished.

The next trick we shall relate could not be practised now, in

consequence of an alteration in the Turf customs. It was worked in

this fashion by two confederates. Let us suppose it to be the Lewes

races. One of the two goes down to Lewes on the previous day, and by

the last post sends a letter addressed _in pencil_ and unsealed to

his brother-rogue in London. Inside the envelope is a note addressed

to a bookmaker, simply containing the words, ‘Please back ____ for so

much.—Yours truly, JONES’—a blank being left for the horse’s name. This

missive arrives in town by the morning post, and the instant the race

is run the name of the winner is telegraphed to rogue number two, who

then inserts the name of the horse, rubs out his own name and address

from the envelope, writes that of the bookmaker instead, and seals

it up. Everything is now perfect in appearance: there are the Lewes

postmark of the previous night, the London of the morning, and the seal

untampered with. We need scarcely say that the handwriting appears to

be the same, and, according to the rules of racing at that time, if a

letter be delayed in transmission through the post, the bookmaker is

still made answerable for its contents.

Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 150, Vol. III, November 13, 1886 · 第 1 / 3 段