The hard conditions of the lonely New England life, with its religious

theories as sombre as its forests, its rigid notions of duty as difficult

to make bloom into sweetness and beauty as the stony soil, would have

been unendurable if they had not been touched with the ideal created by

the poet. There was in creed and purpose the virility that creates a

state, and, as Menander says, the country which is cultivated with

difficulty produces brave men; but we leave out an important element in

the lives of the Pilgrims if we overlook the means they had of living

above their barren circumstances. I do not speak only of the culture

which many of them brought from the universities, of the Greek and Roman

classics, and what unworldly literature they could glean from the

productive age of Elizabeth and James, but of another source, more

universally resorted to, and more powerful in exciting imagination and

emotion, and filling the want in human nature of which we have spoken.

They had the Bible, and it was more to them, much more, than a book of

religion, than a revelation of religious truth, a rule for the conduct of

life, or a guide to heaven. It supplied the place to them of the

Mahabharata to the Hindoo, of the story-teller to the Arab. It opened to

them a boundless realm of poetry and imagination.

What is the Bible? It might have sufficed, accepted as a book of

revelation, for all the purposes of moral guidance, spiritual

consolation, and systematized authority, if it had been a collection of

precepts, a dry code of morals, an arsenal of judgments, and a treasury

of promises. We are accustomed to think of the Pilgrims as training their

intellectual faculties in the knottiest problems of human responsibility

and destiny, toughening their mental fibre in wrestling with dogmas and

the decrees of Providence, forgetting what else they drew out of the

Bible: what else it was to them in a degree it has been to few peoples

many age. For the Bible is the unequaled record of thought and emotion,

the reservoir of poetry, traditions, stories, parables, exaltations,

consolations, great imaginative adventure, for which the spirit of man is

always longing. It might have been, in warning examples and commands,

all-sufficient to enable men to make a decent pilgrimage on earth and

reach a better country; but it would have been a very different book to

mankind if it had been only a volume of statutes, and if it lacked its

wonderful literary quality. It might have enabled men to reach a better

country, but not, while on earth, to rise into and live in that better

country, or to live in a region above the sordidness of actual life. For,

apart from its religious intention and sacred character, the book is so

written that it has supremely in its history, poetry, prophecies,

promises, stories, that clear literary quality that supplies, as

certainly no other single book does, the want in the human mind which is

higher than the want of facts or knowledge.

The Bible is the best illustration of the literature of power, for it

always concerns itself with life, it touches it at all points. And this

is the test of any piece of literature--its universal appeal to human

nature. When I consider the narrow limitations of the Pilgrim households,

the absence of luxury, the presence of danger and hardship, the harsh

laws--only less severe than the contemporary laws of England and

Virginia--the weary drudgery, the few pleasures, the curb upon the

expression of emotion and of tenderness, the ascetic repression of

worldly thought, the absence of poetry in the routine occupations and

conditions, I can feel what the Bible must have been to them. It was an

open door into a world where emotion is expressed, where imagination can

range, where love and longing find a language, where imagery is given to

every noble and suppressed passion of the soul, where every aspiration

finds wings. It was history, or, as Thucydides said, philosophy teaching

by example; it was the romance of real life; it was entertainment

unfailing; the wonder-book of childhood, the volume of sweet sentiment to

the shy maiden, the sword to the soldier, the inciter of the youth to

heroic enduring of hardness, it was the refuge of the aged in failing

activity. Perhaps we can nowhere find a better illustration of the true

relation of literature to life than in this example.

Let us consider the comparative value of literature to mankind. By

comparative value I mean its worth to men in comparison with other things

of acknowledged importance, such as the creation of industries, the

government of States, the manipulation of the politics of an age, the

achievements in war and discovery, and the lives of admirable men. It

needs a certain perspective to judge of this aright, for the near and the

immediate always assume importance. The work that an age has on hand,

whether it be discovery, conquest, the wars that determine boundaries or

are fought for policies, the industries that develop a country or affect

the character of a people, the wielding of power, the accumulation of

fortunes, the various activities of any given civilization or period,

assume such enormous proportions to those engaged in them that such a

modest thing as the literary product seems insignificant in comparison;

and hence it is that the man of action always holds in slight esteem the

man of thought, and especially the expresser of feeling and emotion, the

poet and the humorist. It is only when we look back over the ages, when

civilizations have passed or changed, over the rivalries of States, the

ambitions and enmities of men, the shining deeds and the base deeds that

make up history, that we are enabled to see what remains, what is

permanent. Perhaps the chief result left to the world out of a period of

heroic exertion, of passion and struggle and accumulation, is a sheaf of

poems, or the record by a man of letters of some admirable character.

Spain filled a large place in the world in the sixteenth century, and its

influence upon history is by no means spent yet; but we have inherited

out of that period nothing, I dare say, that is of more value than the

romance of Don Quixote. It is true that the best heritage of generation

from generation is the character of great men; but we always owe its

transmission to the poet and the writer. Without Plato there would be no

Socrates. There is no influence comparable in human life to the

personality of a powerful man, so long as he is present to his

generation, or lives in the memory of those who felt his influence. But

after time has passed, will the world, will human life, that is

essentially the same in all changing conditions, be more affected by what

Bismarck did or by what Goethe said?

We may without impropriety take for an illustration of the comparative

value of literature to human needs the career of a man now living. In the

opinion of many, Mr. Gladstone is the greatest Englishman of this age.

What would be the position of the British empire, what would be the

tendency of English politics and society without him, is a matter for

speculation. He has not played such a role for England and its neighbors

as Bismarck has played for Germany and the Continent, but he has been one

of the most powerful influences in molding English action. He is the

foremost teacher. Rarely in history has a nation depended more upon a

single man, at times, than the English upon Gladstone, upon his will, his

ability, and especially his character. In certain recent crises the

thought of losing him produced something like a panic in the English

mind, justifying in regard to him, the hyperbole of Choate upon the death

of Webster, that the sailor on the distant sea would feel less safe--as

if a protecting providence had been withdrawn from the world. His mastery

of finance and of economic problems, his skill in debate, his marvelous

achievements in oratory, have extorted the admiration of his enemies.

There is scarcely a province in government, letters, art, or research in

which the mind can win triumphs that he has not invaded and displayed his

power in; scarcely a question in politics, reform, letters, religion,

archaeology, sociology, which he has not discussed with ability. He is a

scholar, critic, parliamentarian, orator, voluminous writer. He seems

equally at home in every field of human activity--a man of prodigious

capacity and enormous acquirements. He can take up, with a turn of the

hand, and always with vigor, the cause of the Greeks, Papal power,

education, theology, the influence of Egypt on Homer, the effect of

English legislation on King O'Brien, contributing something noteworthy to

all the discussions of the day. But I am not aware that he has ever

produced a single page of literature. Whatever space he has filled in his

own country, whatever and however enduring the impression he has made

upon English life and society, does it seem likely that the sum total of

his immense activity in so many fields, after the passage of so many

years, will be worth to the world as much as the simple story of Rab and

his Friends? Already in America I doubt if it is. The illustration might

have more weight with some minds if I contrasted the work of this great

man--as to its answering to a deep want in human nature--with a novel

like 'Henry Esmond' or a poem like 'In Memoriam'; but I think it is

sufficient to rest it upon so slight a performance as the sketch by Dr.

John Brown, of Edinburgh. For the truth is that a little page of

literature, nothing more than a sheet of paper with a poem written on it,

may have that vitality, that enduring quality, that adaptation to life,

that make it of more consequence to all who inherit it than every

material achievement of the age that produced it. It was nothing but a

sheet of paper with a poem on it, carried to the door of his London

patron, for which the poet received a guinea, and perhaps a seat at the

foot of my lord's table. What was that scrap compared to my lord's

business, his great establishment, his equipages in the Park, his

position in society, his weight in the House of Lords, his influence in

Europe? And yet that scrap of paper has gone the world over; it has been

sung in the camp, wept over in the lonely cottage; it has gone with the

marching regiments, with the explorers--with mankind, in short, on its

way down the ages, brightening, consoling, elevating life; and my lord,

who regarded as scarcely above a menial the poet to whom he tossed the

guinea--my lord, with all his pageantry and power, has utterly gone and

left no witness.

The Relation of Literature to Life · 第 4 / 4 段